Next Article in Journal
Porous Medium Typology Influence on the Scaling Laws of Confined Aquifer Characteristic Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Rural Water Collection Patterns: Combining Smart Meter Data with User Experiences in Tanzania
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Ascending and Fading of a Progressive Policy Instrument: The Climate Change Factor in Southern Germany
Open AccessArticle

Impact of Scientific Scrutiny after the 2016 Braunsbach Flash Flood on Flood-Risk Management in the State of Baden-Württemberg, Germany

1
Center for Applied Geoscience, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
2
Department of Politics & Public Administration, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany
3
NRW-Forschungskolleg Future Water, Rhein Ruhr Institute for Social Research and Policy Consulting (RISP), University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(4), 1165; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041165
Received: 28 January 2020 / Revised: 9 April 2020 / Accepted: 10 April 2020 / Published: 18 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Attention and Water Governance: An Agenda-Setting Perspective)
This paper presents interdisciplinary research focusing on the municipality of Braunsbach in the German state of Baden-Württemberg, where, in May 2016, a flash flood attracted media attention and scientific scrutiny that highlighted the fact that certain aspects of flood risk were overlooked during earlier assessments conducted by the municipality, such as sediment transport. Using a network analysis and a focus-group discussion, we traced the flow of knowledge through the reported interactions between governmental, private, and academic actors in the two and a half years after the event. From our analysis, we learned that the extreme event attracted scientists to the formal and informal assessment of the hazard and the associated damages. Most importantly, we found conditions under which scientific scrutiny is not detached from but becomes integrated in a governance setting. While it is through this process that sediment transport has become an integral part of flood-risk management in Baden-Württemberg, with an evident impact on the measures already implemented, the impact of morphological changes, as well as large wood and sediment transport, have not been factored into the risk assessment as of yet. These variations in scientific impact on the assessment can be explained by decision biases that can occur when decision makers are under pressure to tackle vulnerabilities and thus lack the time to deliberate in a way that uses all the available evidence. View Full-Text
Keywords: water governance; flood-risk management; agenda setting; public attention water governance; flood-risk management; agenda setting; public attention
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Witting, A.; Brandenstein, F.; Zarfl, C.; Lucía, A. Impact of Scientific Scrutiny after the 2016 Braunsbach Flash Flood on Flood-Risk Management in the State of Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Water 2020, 12, 1165.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop