Next Article in Journal
Modified Hiltner Dew Balance to Re-Estimate Dewfall Accumulation as a Reliable Water Source in the Negev Desert
Previous Article in Journal
Stochastic Modelling of Small-Scale Perturbation
Open AccessArticle

River Water Salinity Prediction Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models

1
Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
2
Department of Watershed Management, Sari Agricultural and Natural Resources University, Sari 48181-68984, Iran
3
Department of Geography, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
4
Laboratory of Research in Biodiversity Interaction Ecosystem and Biotechnology, University 20 Août 1955, Route El Hadaik, BP 26, Skikda 21000, Algeria
5
Department of Railroad Construction and Safety Engineering, Dongyang University, Yeongju 36040, Korea
6
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
7
School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1430 As, Norway
8
Thuringian Institute of Sustainability and Climate Protection, 07743 Jena, Germany
9
Institute of Automation, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary
10
Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(10), 2951; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102951
Received: 8 August 2020 / Revised: 15 October 2020 / Accepted: 15 October 2020 / Published: 21 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology and Hydrogeology)
Electrical conductivity (EC), one of the most widely used indices for water quality assessment, has been applied to predict the salinity of the Babol-Rood River, the greatest source of irrigation water in northern Iran. This study uses two individual—M5 Prime (M5P) and random forest (RF)—and eight novel hybrid algorithms—bagging-M5P, bagging-RF, random subspace (RS)-M5P, RS-RF, random committee (RC)-M5P, RC-RF, additive regression (AR)-M5P, and AR-RF—to predict EC. Thirty-six years of observations collected by the Mazandaran Regional Water Authority were randomly divided into two sets: 70% from the period 1980 to 2008 was used as model-training data and 30% from 2009 to 2016 was used as testing data to validate the models. Several water quality variables—pH, HCO3, Cl, SO42−, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, river discharge (Q), and total dissolved solids (TDS)—were modeling inputs. Using EC and the correlation coefficients (CC) of the water quality variables, a set of nine input combinations were established. TDS, the most effective input variable, had the highest EC-CC (r = 0.91), and it was also determined to be the most important input variable among the input combinations. All models were trained and each model’s prediction power was evaluated with the testing data. Several quantitative criteria and visual comparisons were used to evaluate modeling capabilities. Results indicate that, in most cases, hybrid algorithms enhance individual algorithms’ predictive powers. The AR algorithm enhanced both M5P and RF predictions better than bagging, RS, and RC. M5P performed better than RF. Further, AR-M5P outperformed all other algorithms (R2 = 0.995, RMSE = 8.90 μs/cm, MAE = 6.20 μs/cm, NSE = 0.994 and PBIAS = −0.042). The hybridization of machine learning methods has significantly improved model performance to capture maximum salinity values, which is essential in water resource management. View Full-Text
Keywords: water salinity; machine learning; bagging; random forest; random subspace; data science; hydrological model; big data; hydroinformatics; electrical conductivity water salinity; machine learning; bagging; random forest; random subspace; data science; hydrological model; big data; hydroinformatics; electrical conductivity
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Melesse, A.M.; Khosravi, K.; Tiefenbacher, J.P.; Heddam, S.; Kim, S.; Mosavi, A.; Pham, B.T. River Water Salinity Prediction Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models. Water 2020, 12, 2951.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop