Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Biomass Activated Carbon Supported Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron (Nzvi) and Its Application in Decolorization of Methyl Orange from Aqueous Solution
Next Article in Special Issue
Engaging with Flows: Embodied Cognition in Water Provision
Previous Article in Journal
How Are Various Surrogate Indicators Consistent with Mechanical Reliability of Water Distribution Systems: From a Perspective of Many-Objective Optimization
Correction published on 25 February 2020, see Water 2020, 12(3), 624.
Open AccessArticle

Attention to Sociotechnical Tinkering with Irrigation Infrastructure as a Way to Rethink Water Governance

1
Integrated Water Systems and Governance Department, IHE Delft, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands
2
Governance and Inclusive Development Group, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15718, 1001 NE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
Department of Land and Water Resources Management, Midlands State University, Bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe
4
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
5
SILVANOVOA Consultores S.A.C., Jr. Tarapacá 131, Barranco, Lima 04, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(8), 1670; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081670
Received: 20 June 2019 / Revised: 17 July 2019 / Accepted: 29 July 2019 / Published: 12 August 2019
Inspired by the proposal of political scientists and anthropologists to focus on “practice” as the smallest unit of analysis for understanding politics, as well as the renewed scholarly attention to materiality, this paper sets out to show that detailed ethnographic attention to processes and acts of sociotechnical tinkering provides a useful entry-point for understanding water governance. This is so methodologically, because infrastructural forms of tinkering are very visible, and therefore researchable, manifestations of agency and change in water governance. Attention to sociotechnical tinkering helps shift the basis for understanding water realities from official norms, designs and laws to everyday practices. This in turn allows questioning, rather than assuming, how expertise and agency are exercised and distributed in water governance, thereby also providing useful information for re-thinking water politics. In addition, by explicitly engaging with the contingency and capriciousness of actual water flows, a sociotechnical tinkering approach entails a much-needed re-appreciation of the materiality of water, infrastructure and other matter, a re-appreciation that extends to those who design, construct, operate and use water infrastructure. View Full-Text
Keywords: irrigation; smallholder farmers; water infrastructure; practices; materiality irrigation; smallholder farmers; water infrastructure; practices; materiality
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kemerink-Seyoum, J.S.; Chitata, T.; Domínguez Guzmán, C.; Novoa-Sanchez, L.M.; Zwarteveen, M.Z. Attention to Sociotechnical Tinkering with Irrigation Infrastructure as a Way to Rethink Water Governance. Water 2019, 11, 1670.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop