Next Article in Journal
Economic Impact of Overtopping and Adaptation Measures in Catalan Ports Due to Sea Level Rise
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Multi-Scale Coupled Ecological Dispatching Model Based on the Decomposition-Coordination Principle
Previous Article in Journal
Batch and Column Scale Removal of Cadmium from Water Using Raw and Acid Activated Wheat Straw Biochar
Previous Article in Special Issue
Local Scour of Armor Layer Processes around the Circular Pier in Non-Uniform Gravel Bed
Open AccessArticle

Internal Stability Evaluation of Soils

1
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2
Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
3
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo-Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0116, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(7), 1439; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071439
Received: 18 May 2019 / Revised: 9 July 2019 / Accepted: 9 July 2019 / Published: 12 July 2019
Suffusion constitutes a major threat to the foundation of a dam, and the likelihood of suffusion is always determined by the internal stability of soils. It has been verified that internal stability is closely related to the grain size distribution (GSD) of soils. In this study, a numerical model is developed to simulate the suffusion process. The model takes the combined effects of GSD and porosity (n) into account, as well as Wilcock and Crowe’s theory, which is also adopted to quantify the inception and transport of soils. This proposed model is validated with the experimental data and shows satisfactory performance in simulating the process of suffusion. By analyzing the simulation results of the model, the mechanism is disclosed on how soils with specific GSD behaving internally unstable. Moreover, the internal stability of soils can be evaluated through the model. Results show that it is able to distinguish the internal stability of 30 runs out of 36, indicating a 83.33% of accuracy, which is higher than the traditional GSD-based approaches. View Full-Text
Keywords: suffusion; internal stability; grain size distribution (GSD) suffusion; internal stability; grain size distribution (GSD)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, Q.; Ho, H.-C.; Man, T.; Wen, J.; Jie, Y.; Fu, X. Internal Stability Evaluation of Soils. Water 2019, 11, 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071439

AMA Style

Feng Q, Ho H-C, Man T, Wen J, Jie Y, Fu X. Internal Stability Evaluation of Soils. Water. 2019; 11(7):1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Qingfeng; Ho, Hao-Che; Man, Teng; Wen, Jiaming; Jie, Yuxin; Fu, Xudong. 2019. "Internal Stability Evaluation of Soils" Water 11, no. 7: 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071439

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop