Next Article in Journal
Dissolved Carbon Transport and Processing in North America’s Largest Swamp River Entering the Northern Gulf of Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Relationships between Spatial and Temporal Variations in Precipitation, Climatic Indices, and the Normalized Differential Vegetation Index in the Upper and Middle Reaches of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Roughness Effect of Submerged Groyne Fields with Varying Length, Groyne Distance, and Groyne Types
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Water-Worked Bedload: Hydrodynamics and Mass Transport

by
Paweł M. Rowiński
1,* and
Subhasish Dey
2
1
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ks. Janusza 64, 01-452 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(7), 1396; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071396
Submission received: 5 July 2019 / Accepted: 5 July 2019 / Published: 7 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water-Worked Bedload: Hydrodynamic and Mass Transport)
Turbulent flow over a natural streambed is complex in nature, especially in the near-bed flow zone, because a natural water-worked bed exhibits a spatially complex, three-dimensional structure [1,2,3]. This echoes the organization of the bed particles by transport processes. The orientation, imbrication, sorting, and layering of the deposited bed particles are governed by the continual deposition and reworking by several flood cycles. Besides, the bedload transport rate is often predicted from the flow induced bed shear stress with respect to the threshold shear stress, which represents the bed shear stress required for particle entrainment by the flow [4]. Our knowledge on how sediment is transported under such a complex situation is still insufficient, which triggers a good deal of experimental, theoretical, and computational efforts. The near-bed flow is greatly affected by a complex, colossal, fluid–sediment interface giving rise to a spatial flow heterogeneity together with a significant temporal intermittency in the vicinity of the bed. In a natural stream, such a complex flow plays a decisive role in developing its morphological environment. In this process, a so-called water-worked bed is formed in a natural stream. By contrast, in laboratory scale experimental studies, a simulated streambed in a flume is generally created by arbitrarily dumping the sediment particle mixture to a given thickness. The sediment bed surface is then worn and levelled, preparing a screeded bed. Even though if the distribution of sediment particle size used in the laboratory experimental study is same as that of the particle size in a natural streambed, the simulated streambed (bed surface characteristics) cannot be deemed to be acceptable as analogous to that in the natural streambed. To be specific, the screeded bed is essentially a mixture of randomly sorted sediment particles and its statistical distribution in terms of bed surface topography is incompetent to mimic a water-worked bed. The bed surface topography and the flow characteristics in water-worked and screeded gravel beds were explored by several researchers [1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, a series of recent studies by Padhi et al. [13,14,15] indicated a clear distinction in turbulence characteristics in water-worked and screeded gravel bed flows. Therefore, the research on water-worked beds, in addition to the related hydrodynamics and transport processes, being the topic of this Special Issue, demands further attention.
The application of the water-worked bed concept to fluvial hydraulics is developing rapidly and it has already been successful in a number of laboratory scale model studies, including data analysis and interpretation, and supervising conceptual framework and parameterizations by a number of research groups around the world. To be specific, the impact of water-work on transporting sediment, especially as a bedload, is of primary importance. Moreover, sediment transport by the modification of flow at a river protection structure, such as a groyne or a spur dike, has a detrimental effect of forming a scour hole around it. Therefore, the topic of scours at a river protection structure has been a continued interest of research over several decades. Furthermore, investigators have not been restricted to the laboratory scale model studies. They have been, on several occasions, more interested in conducting field studies in natural streambeds, where the beds are water-worked. This tendency in the current research trend is reflected in this Special Issue. It includes nine papers, which can be classified into four categories. The first category is comprised of two review papers from Mrokowska and Rowiński [16] on bedload transport by unsteady flow and Padhi et al. [17] on water-worked gravel beds. These papers deliver an excellent background that is useful for understanding and modeling bedload transport under unsteady flow conditions and for the morphological and flow characteristics in water-worked beds. Both studies are mostly based on experimental investigations. The second category includes studies on river protection structures by Möws and Koll [18] on groynes (one paper) and by Zhang et al. [19,20] on spur dikes (two papers). The former focuses on backwater effect and resistance to flow, and the latter two on scours at spur dikes. Both studies are important from the perspective of designing river protection structures. One paper, by Antico et al. [21], is dedicated to the velocity law in hydraulically rough flow over mobile granular beds, which falls into the third category. The fourth category presents important field studies by Radecki-Pawlik et al. [22] on the Mlynne and Lososina streams in the Polish Carpathians; Huang et al. [23] on the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) in China; and Przyborowski et al. [24] on the Jeziorka River and Swider River in Poland.
The Editors finally hope that this Special Issue will be beneficial to advance future research studies and to further develop the water-worked bed concept, including other related issues in laboratory scale models and field studies, and its applications in sedimentology, geophysics, fluvial hydraulics, and environmental and hydraulic engineering.

References

  1. Hardy, R.J.; Best, J.L.; Lane, S.N.; Carbonneau, P.E. Coherent flow structures in a depth-limited flow over a gravel surface: The role of near-bed turbulence and influence of Reynolds number. J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114, F01003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McLean, S.R.; Nelson, J.M.; Wolfe, S.R. Turbulence structure over two-dimensional bed forms: Implications for sediment transport. J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 12729–12747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maddahi, M.R.; Afzalimehr, H.; Rowiński, P.M. Flow characteristics over a gravel bedform: Kaj River case study. Acta Geophys. 2016, 64, 1779–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dey, S. Fluvial Hydrodynamics: Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Phenomena; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kirchner, J.W.; Dietrich, W.E.; Iseya, F.; Ikeda, H. The variability of critical shear stress friction angle, and grain protrusion in water-worked sediments. Sedimentology 1990, 37, 647–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nikora, V.; Goring, D.; Biggs, B.J.F. On gravel-bed roughness characterization. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marion, A.; Tait, S.J.; McEwan, I.K. Analysis of small-scale gravel bed topography during armoring. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aberle, J.; Nikora, V. Statistical properties of armored gravel bed surfaces. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42, W11414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Buffin-Bélanger, T.; Rice, S.; Reid, I.; Lancaster, J. Spatial heterogeneity of near-bed hydraulics above a patch of river gravel. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42, W04413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cooper, J.R.; Tait, S.J. The spatial organisation of time-averaged streamwise velocity and its correlation with the surface topography of water-worked gravel beds. Acta Geophys. 2008, 56, 614–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cooper, J.R.; Tait, S.J. Water-worked gravel beds in laboratory flumes: A natural analogue? Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 2009, 34, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cooper, J.R.; Tait, S.J. Spatially representative velocity measurement over water-worked gravel beds. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46, W11559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Padhi, E.; Penna, N.; Dey, S.; Gaudio, R. Hydrodynamics of water-worked and screeded gravel beds: A comparative study. Phys. Fluids 2018, 30, 085105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Padhi, E.; Penna, N.; Dey, S.; Gaudio, R. Spatially-averaged dissipation rate in flows over water-worked and screeded gravel beds. Phys. Fluids 2018, 30, 125106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Padhi, E.; Penna, N.; Dey, S.; Gaudio, R. Near-bed turbulence structures in water-worked and screeded gravel-bed flows. Phys. Fluids 2019, 31, 045107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mrokowska, M.M.; Rowiński, P.M. Impact of unsteady flow events on bedload transport: A review of laboratory experiments. Water 2019, 11, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Padhi, E.; Dey, S.; Desai, V.; Penna, N.; Gaudio, R. Water-worked gravel bed: State-of-the-art review. Water 2019, 11, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Möws, R.; Koll, K. Roughness effect of submerged groyne fields with varying length, groyne distance, and groyne types. Water 2019, 11, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.; Wang, P.; Yang, W.; Zuo, W.; Gu, X.; Yang, X. Geometric characteristics of spur dike scour under clear-water scour conditions. Water 2018, 10, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, B.; Chen, J. The 3-D morphology evolution of spur dike scour under clear-water scour conditions. Water 2018, 10, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Antico, F.; Ricardo, A.M.; Ferreira, R.M.L. The logarithmic law of the wall in flows over mobile lattice-arranged granular beds. Water 2019, 11, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Radecki-Pawlik, A.; Kuboń, P.; Radecki-Pawlik, B.; Plesiński, K. Bed-load transport in two different-sized mountain catchments: Mlynne and Lososina Streams, Polish Carpathians. Water 2019, 11, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, L.; Fang, H.; Ni, K.; Yang, W.; Zhao, W.; He, G.; Han, Y.; Li, X. Distribution and potential risk of heavy metals in sediments of the Three Gorges Reservoir: The relationship to environmental variables. Water 2018, 10, 1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Przyborowski, Ł.; Łoboda, A.M.; Bialik, R.J. Experimental investigations of interactions between sand wave movements, flow structure, and individual aquatic plants in natural rivers: A case study of Potamogeton Pectinatus L. Water 2018, 10, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rowiński, P.M.; Dey, S. Water-Worked Bedload: Hydrodynamics and Mass Transport. Water 2019, 11, 1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071396

AMA Style

Rowiński PM, Dey S. Water-Worked Bedload: Hydrodynamics and Mass Transport. Water. 2019; 11(7):1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rowiński, Paweł M., and Subhasish Dey. 2019. "Water-Worked Bedload: Hydrodynamics and Mass Transport" Water 11, no. 7: 1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071396

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop