Next Article in Journal
Decadal-Scale Variations of Thalweg Morphology and Riffle–Pool Sequences in Response to Flow Regulation in the Lowermost Mississippi River
Next Article in Special Issue
Unfolding the Water Framework Directive Implementation at the River Basin District Scale: An Italian Case Study on Irrigation Measures
Previous Article in Journal
A New Scenario-Based Framework for Conflict Resolution in Water Allocation in Transboundary Watersheds
Open AccessArticle

Integrated Water Resources Management and Policy Integration: Lessons from 169 Years of Flood Policies in Switzerland

by Florence Metz 1,2,* and Anik Glaus 2,3
1
Natural Resource Policy Group, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 22, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
2
Institute of Political Science, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3013 Bern, Switzerland
3
Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Hochschulstrasse 4, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(6), 1173; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061173
Received: 18 April 2019 / Revised: 28 May 2019 / Accepted: 30 May 2019 / Published: 5 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Public Policy Analysis of Integrated Water Resource Management)
In times of increasing pressures on water resources, the integrated management of the resource is a central policy objective. While there exists encompassing research about the concept of integrated water resources management (IWRM), much remains to be studied regarding the integration of water-related policies. Water resources management profits when policy actors coordinate their demands and actions across policy sectors, territorial entities, and decision-making levels within a water basin. However, actors are bound by the policy framework, which organizes water resources management in defined sectors and, over time, develop into independent and specialized policy pillars. A growing number of policies increases the need to integrate those policies over time following the institutional resources regime (IRR) framework. However, an increasing number of policies also proves challenging in establishing an integrated, coherent regime compliant with IWRM. In this study, we analyze flood risk management policies and find an almost exponential increase in policies over time, while flood risks and damage have not decreased in parallel. We address this empirical puzzle with an in-depth analysis of the design of Swiss flood risk management policies over time. To this end, we survey the opinion of 146 flood experts on the importance of ten policy design indicators in three flood-prone regions in Switzerland. Flood risk management experts attribute particular importance to policy designs characterized by integration, a sufficient budget for policy implementation, and coercive instruments and sanctions. We then compare survey results to the ways in which Swiss policies have been designed in legislation across policy sectors related to flood risk management over the last 169 years. We find that policy designs follow a national policy style. Placing these results in local contexts, we explain why the design of policies represents both a challenge and opportunity for policy-makers involved in flood risk management. View Full-Text
Keywords: IWRM; policy integration; policy design over time; policy design preferences; policy indicators; flood risk management IWRM; policy integration; policy design over time; policy design preferences; policy indicators; flood risk management
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Metz, F.; Glaus, A. Integrated Water Resources Management and Policy Integration: Lessons from 169 Years of Flood Policies in Switzerland. Water 2019, 11, 1173.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop