Next Article in Journal
Condition Assessment of Water Infrastructures: Application to Segura River Basin (Spain)
Next Article in Special Issue
Interplays between State and Flux Hydrological Variables across Vadose Zones: A Numerical Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
Extreme Precipitation in China in Response to Emission Reductions under the Paris Agreement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity of Potential Groundwater Recharge to Projected Climate Change Scenarios: A Site-Specific Study in the Nebraska Sand Hills, USA
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Study of Methods for Delineating the Wellhead Protection Area in an Unconfined Coastal Aquifer

1
School of Civil Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
2
Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, Midreshet Ben-Gurion 84990, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(6), 1168; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061168
Received: 6 May 2019 / Revised: 30 May 2019 / Accepted: 31 May 2019 / Published: 4 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Flow, Solute and Heat Transfer in Groundwater)
Various delineation methods, ranging from simple analytical solutions to complex numerical models, have been applied for wellhead protection area (WHPA) delineation. Numerical modeling is usually regarded as the most reliable method, but the uncertainty of input parameters has always been an obstacle. This study aims at examining the results from different WHPA delineation methods and addressing the delineation uncertainty of numerical modeling due to the uncertainty from input parameters. A comparison and uncertainty analysis were performed at two pumping sites—a single well and a wellfield consisting of eight wells in an unconfined coastal aquifer in Israel. By appointing numerical modeling as the reference method, a comparison between different methods showed that a semi-analytical method best fits the reference WHPA, and that analytical solutions produced overestimated WHPAs in unconfined aquifers as regional groundwater flow characteristics were neglected. The results from single well and wellfield indicated that interferences between wells are important for WHPA delineation, and thus, that only semi-analytical and numerical modelling are recommended for WHPA delineation at wellfields. Stochastic modeling was employed to analyze the uncertainty of numerical method, and the probabilistic distribution of WHPAs, rather a deterministic protection area, was generated with considering the uncertain input hydrogeological parameters. View Full-Text
Keywords: groundwater protection; wellhead protection area (WHPA); uncertainty analysis groundwater protection; wellhead protection area (WHPA); uncertainty analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Weisbrod, N.; Yakirevich, A. Comparative Study of Methods for Delineating the Wellhead Protection Area in an Unconfined Coastal Aquifer. Water 2019, 11, 1168.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop