Next Article in Journal
Assessing Future Impacts of Climate Change on Water Supply System Performance: Application to the Pozzillo Reservoir in Sicily, Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Measuring and Modelling Soil Evaporation in an Irrigated Olive Orchard to Improve Water Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Large Scale Flood Hazard Analysis by Including Defence Failures on the Dutch River System
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Systemic Flood Risk Management: The Challenge of Accounting for Hydraulic Interactions

Department of Flood Risk Management, Deltares, 2600 MH Delft, The Netherlands
Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(12), 2530;
Received: 14 October 2019 / Revised: 17 November 2019 / Accepted: 27 November 2019 / Published: 29 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Risk Analysis and Management from a System's Approach)
Rivers typically flow through multiple flood-protected areas which are clearly interconnected, as risk reduction measures taken at one area, e.g., heightening dikes or building flood storage areas, affect risk elsewhere. We call these interconnections ‘hydraulic interactions’. The current approach to flood risk management, however, neglects hydraulic interactions for two reasons: They are uncertain and, furthermore, considering them would require the design of policies not only striving for risk reduction, but also accounting for risk transfers across flood-protected areas. In the present paper, we compare the performance of policies identified according to the current approach with those of two alternative formulations: One acknowledging hydraulic interactions and the other also including an additional decision criterion to account for equity in risk distribution across flood-protected areas. Optimal policies are first identified under deterministic hydraulic interactions, and, next, they are stress-tested under uncertainty. We found that the current approach leads to a false sense of equal risk distribution. It does, however, perform efficiently when a risk-averse approach towards uncertain hydraulic interactions is taken. Accounting for hydraulic interactions in the design of policies, instead, increases efficiency and both efficiency and equity when hydraulic interactions are considered deterministically and as uncertain, respectively. View Full-Text
Keywords: flood risk management; uncertain hydraulic interactions; equity flood risk management; uncertain hydraulic interactions; equity
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ciullo, A.; De Bruijn, K.M.; Kwakkel, J.H.; Klijn, F. Systemic Flood Risk Management: The Challenge of Accounting for Hydraulic Interactions. Water 2019, 11, 2530.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop