Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Dynamic Influence of Hydrological Model Parameters on Runoff Simulation Using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting-2-Based Multilevel-Factorial-Analysis Method
Previous Article in Journal
Symbolic Regression-Based Genetic Approximations of the Colebrook Equation for Flow Friction
Article

Evaluation of Water-Storage and Water-Saving Potential for Paddy Fields in Gaoyou, China

by 1,2, 1,2,*, 1,2,3, 1,2, 1,2 and 1,2
1
State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China
2
National Center of Efficient Irrigation Engineering and Technology Research, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China
3
Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan 430079, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(9), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091176
Received: 30 July 2018 / Revised: 24 August 2018 / Accepted: 27 August 2018 / Published: 2 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Water Use and Scarcity)
In China, the stress on agricultural water resources is becoming increasingly severe. In response, a range of water-saving irrigation (WSI) policies and practices have been promoted to improve irrigation efficiency. In this study, a water-balance model in paddy fields was calibrated and validated using a 2-year field experimental dataset collected from an irrigated area in Gaoyou, China, in 2014–2015. The model was used to assess the effects of WSI practices and provides options for implementing water-price reforms. Results show that paddy fields effectively retain rainfall with utilization rates greater than 70% for both shallow wet irrigation (SWI) and shallow humidity-regulated irrigation (SHRI) scenarios. The estimated average water-saving rates from 1960 to 2015 using SWI and SHRI are 33.7% and 43%, respectively, which represent considerable reductions in water consumption. The benefits of WSI practices combined with water management policies are also evident. For example, conversion of irrigation water to industrial water yields a 3-year average water fee of 205.2 yuan/ha using SWI and 20.6 yuan/ha using SHRI, considerably reducing farmers’ financial burden for agricultural water supplies. In conclusion, we recommend the adoption of SWI and SHRI practices in southern China as a means of partially alleviating China’s water-shortage problem. View Full-Text
Keywords: paddy fields; paddy water balance; water-saving irrigation practices; agricultural water price reform paddy fields; paddy water balance; water-saving irrigation practices; agricultural water price reform
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Tao, Y.; Liu, J. Evaluation of Water-Storage and Water-Saving Potential for Paddy Fields in Gaoyou, China. Water 2018, 10, 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091176

AMA Style

Wang C, Wang S, Chen H, Wang J, Tao Y, Liu J. Evaluation of Water-Storage and Water-Saving Potential for Paddy Fields in Gaoyou, China. Water. 2018; 10(9):1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chuanjuan, Shaoli Wang, Haorui Chen, Jiandong Wang, Yuan Tao, and Jing Liu. 2018. "Evaluation of Water-Storage and Water-Saving Potential for Paddy Fields in Gaoyou, China" Water 10, no. 9: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091176

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop