Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Runoff Components Simulated by GLDAS against UNH–GRDC Dataset at Global and Hemispheric Scales
Next Article in Special Issue
Flood Routing in River Reaches Using a Three-Parameter Muskingum Model Coupled with an Improved Bat Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling the Runoff Reduction Effect of Low Impact Development Installations in an Industrial Area, South Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving the Muskingum Flood Routing Method Using a Hybrid of Particle Swarm Optimization and Bat Algorithm
Open AccessArticle

Flood Hydrograph Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods

Department Civil Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir 35430, Turkey
Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering & Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, 321 Scoates Hall, 2117 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA
IRPI, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, via Madonna Alta 126, 06128 Perugia, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(8), 968;
Received: 28 June 2018 / Revised: 19 July 2018 / Accepted: 20 July 2018 / Published: 24 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Forecasting Using Machine Learning Methods)
Machine learning (soft) methods have a wide range of applications in many disciplines, including hydrology. The first application of these methods in hydrology started in the 1990s and have since been extensively employed. Flood hydrograph prediction is important in hydrology and is generally done using linear or nonlinear Muskingum (NLM) methods or the numerical solutions of St. Venant (SV) flow equations or their simplified forms. However, soft computing methods are also utilized. This study discusses the application of the artificial neural network (ANN), the genetic algorithm (GA), the ant colony optimization (ACO), and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) methods for flood hydrograph predictions. Flow field data recorded on an equipped reach of Tiber River, central Italy, are used for training the ANN and to find the optimal values of the parameters of the rating curve method (RCM) by the GA, ACO, and PSO methods. Real hydrographs are satisfactorily predicted by the methods with an error in peak discharge and time to peak not exceeding, on average, 4% and 1%, respectively. In addition, the parameters of the Nonlinear Muskingum Model (NMM) are optimized by the same methods for flood routing in an artificial channel. Flood hydrographs generated by the NMM are compared against those obtained by the numerical solutions of the St. Venant equations. Results reveal that the machine learning models (ANN, GA, ACO, and PSO) are powerful tools and can be gainfully employed for flood hydrograph prediction. They use less and easily measurable data and have no significant parameter estimation problem. View Full-Text
Keywords: machine learning methods; St. Venant equations; rating curve method; nonlinear Muskingum model; hydrograph predictions machine learning methods; St. Venant equations; rating curve method; nonlinear Muskingum model; hydrograph predictions
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tayfur, G.; Singh, V.P.; Moramarco, T.; Barbetta, S. Flood Hydrograph Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods. Water 2018, 10, 968.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop