Next Article in Journal
Labeling Water Transport Efficiencies
Next Article in Special Issue
The Story of Water in Windhoek: A Narrative Approach to Interpreting a Transdisciplinary Process
Previous Article in Journal
Four Decades of Estuarine Wetland Changes in the Yellow River Delta Based on Landsat Observations Between 1973 and 2013
Previous Article in Special Issue
Informal Settlements and Flooding: Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses in Local Governance for Water Management
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Knowing Me, Knowing You—Capturing Different Knowledge Systems for River Landscape Planning and Governance

1
Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany
2
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(7), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070934
Received: 30 April 2018 / Revised: 12 June 2018 / Accepted: 10 July 2018 / Published: 13 July 2018
Navigating the evolution of river landscapes towards more sustainable pathways requires transdisciplinary research including diverse stakeholders. A thorough understanding of stakeholder interests, including potential conflicts and options for convergence, is critical for the design and implementation of such transdisciplinary research. So far, only a few studies have conducted in-depth stakeholder analyses. The aim of this paper is to elucidate and characterize the interests of the relevant actors in a case study for sustainable river landscape development in Germany. The research questions concern the (i) commonalities and differences as manifested in the structures of thought and action of the actors, and the (ii) potential points of conflict or convergence of interests, as relevant for further transdisciplinary research. Our methods include participating in observations in three meetings of the actors, and conducting twelve individual interviews, as well as a focus group discussion. Our results identify major conflicts between the actors’ perspectives regarding navigation interests and the demands for nature conservation. Potential issues for convergence are ecological river restoration and enhancing recreation opportunities. The findings shed light on the diversity of the stakeholder perspectives around river landscape development. We recommend that future projects capture this diversity through a triangulation approach. View Full-Text
Keywords: transdisciplinary water research; knowledge co-production; stakeholder interaction; stakeholder analysis; knowledge systems; thought style transdisciplinary water research; knowledge co-production; stakeholder interaction; stakeholder analysis; knowledge systems; thought style
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Henze, J.; Schröter, B.; Albert, C. Knowing Me, Knowing You—Capturing Different Knowledge Systems for River Landscape Planning and Governance. Water 2018, 10, 934.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop