Next Article in Journal
Experimental and Numerical Study of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Gullies for Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Scale Baroclinic Simulation of the Effect of Channel Dredging in an Estuarine Setting
Review

A Systematic Review of Quantitative Resilience Measures for Water Infrastructure Systems

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
2
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA
3
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
4
Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(2), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020164
Received: 21 November 2017 / Revised: 19 January 2018 / Accepted: 1 February 2018 / Published: 7 February 2018
Over the past few decades, the concept of resilience has emerged as an important consideration in the planning and management of water infrastructure systems. Accordingly, various resilience measures have been developed for the quantitative evaluation and decision-making of systems. There are, however, numerous considerations and no clear choice of which measure, if any, provides the most appropriate representation of resilience for a given application. This study provides a critical review of quantitative approaches to measure the resilience of water infrastructure systems, with a focus on water resources and distribution systems. A compilation of 11 criteria evaluating 21 selected resilience measures addressing major features of resilience is developed using the Axiomatic Design process. Existing gaps of resilience measures are identified based on the review criteria. The results show that resilience measures have generally paid less attention to cascading damage to interrelated systems, rapid identification of failure, physical damage of system components, and time variation of resilience. Concluding the paper, improvements to resilience measures are recommended. The findings contribute to our understanding of gaps and provide information to help further improve resilience measures of water infrastructure systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: resilience; reliability; water infrastructure system; water resources system; water distribution network; water supply resilience; reliability; water infrastructure system; water resources system; water distribution network; water supply
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, S.; Lee, S.; Judi, D.R.; Parvania, M.; Goharian, E.; McPherson, T.; Burian, S.J. A Systematic Review of Quantitative Resilience Measures for Water Infrastructure Systems. Water 2018, 10, 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020164

AMA Style

Shin S, Lee S, Judi DR, Parvania M, Goharian E, McPherson T, Burian SJ. A Systematic Review of Quantitative Resilience Measures for Water Infrastructure Systems. Water. 2018; 10(2):164. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Sangmin, Seungyub Lee, David R. Judi, Masood Parvania, Erfan Goharian, Timothy McPherson, and Steven J. Burian. 2018. "A Systematic Review of Quantitative Resilience Measures for Water Infrastructure Systems" Water 10, no. 2: 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020164

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop