Next Article in Journal
Seasonal Variability and Evolution of Glaciochemistry at An Alpine Temperate Glacier on the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Rainfall Concentration Using the Gini Index and PCI
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Security in Times of Climate Change and Intractability: Reconciling Conflict by Transforming Security Concerns into Equity Concerns
Open AccessReview

Evolving Governance and Contested Water Reforms in Australia’s Murray Darling Basin

1
Alexandra and Associates, 16 Homestead Road Eltham, Melbourne, VIC 3095, Australia
2
RMIT University, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Water 2018, 10(2), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020113
Received: 8 December 2017 / Revised: 14 January 2018 / Accepted: 16 January 2018 / Published: 29 January 2018
This paper explores the ways water governance adapts to changing social values and political imperatives by examining the case of water policy reforms in Australia’s Murray Darling Basin. Over more than two decades, Australia’s water reforms have explicitly aimed to promote ecological sustainability and economic efficiency, attempting to balance pro-market, micro-economic reforms with broader social and sustainability goals. Despite the formality of Australia’s intergovernmental agreements, water reforms have been expensive and heavily contested, experiencing many implementation challenges. However, water market reforms have generally been regarded as successful, enabling the reallocation of water for environmental and extractive uses, contributing to flexibility and adaptive capacity. Recognising that discursive contestation is central to policy development, the paper documents the way the reform processes have attempted to broker compromises between three competing policy paradigms—national development, economic rationalism and environmentalism. These inherent tensions resulted in prolonged contests for influence over policy directions long after formal statements of policy intent by Governments. Given that climate change is driving the need for water governance reforms, the paper looks to what lessons can be learnt about the redesigns of meta-governance arrangements, including through structured commitments to independent audits and evaluations that can provide the feedback needed for adaptive governance and policy learning. View Full-Text
Keywords: water policy reform; irrigation; water markets; institutional re-design; enforcement innovation; climate adaptation; adaptive water governance; Murray Darling Basin; Australia water policy reform; irrigation; water markets; institutional re-design; enforcement innovation; climate adaptation; adaptive water governance; Murray Darling Basin; Australia
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Alexandra, J. Evolving Governance and Contested Water Reforms in Australia’s Murray Darling Basin. Water 2018, 10, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020113

AMA Style

Alexandra J. Evolving Governance and Contested Water Reforms in Australia’s Murray Darling Basin. Water. 2018; 10(2):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020113

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alexandra, Jason. 2018. "Evolving Governance and Contested Water Reforms in Australia’s Murray Darling Basin" Water 10, no. 2: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020113

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop