Next Article in Journal
A Data-Driven Surrogate Modelling Approach for Acceleration of Short-Term Simulations of a Dynamic Urban Drainage Simulator
Next Article in Special Issue
Behavior of Organic Micropollutants During River Bank Filtration in Budapest, Hungary
Previous Article in Journal
Hydro-Geochemical Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Quality Monitoring in Northern India for an Evaluation of the Efficiency of Bank Filtration Sites
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Flow Analysis through Collector Well Laterals: A Case Study from Sonoma County Water Agency, California

1
Nebraska Water Center, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-6204, USA
2
ERM, Inc., 1277 Treat Boulevards, Walnut Creek, CA 94597, USA
3
Bennet & Williams Environmental Consultants, Inc., 98 County Line Road West, Westerville, OH 43082, USA
4
Sonoma County Water Agency, 404 Aviation Blvd, Santa Rosa, CA 95403, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(12), 1848; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121848
Received: 3 November 2018 / Revised: 27 November 2018 / Accepted: 1 December 2018 / Published: 13 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Efficiency of Bank Filtration and Post-Treatment)
  |  
PDF [4723 KB, uploaded 13 December 2018]
  |  

Abstract

The Sonoma County Water Agency (SWCA) uses six radial collector wells along the Russian River west of Santa Rosa, to provide water for several municipalities and water districts in north-western California. Three collector wells (1, 2, and 6) are located in the Wohler area, and three collector wells (3, 4, and 5) are located in the Mirabel area. The objective of this paper is to highlight the performance of the three collector wells located in the Mirabel area since their construction. The 2015 investigation showed a lower performance of Collectors 3 and 4 compared to their original performances after construction in 1975, while the performance of Collector 5 was relatively stable since 1982. The potential change in capacity could be due to the increase in encrustation observed during the visual inspection of laterals in all three collector wells. Overall, the three collectors are still within the optimal design parameters (screen entrance velocity < 0.305 m min−1 and axial flow velocity of lateral screens < 1.524 m s−1). View Full-Text
Keywords: riverbank filtration; collector wells; performance; entrance velocity riverbank filtration; collector wells; performance; entrance velocity
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

D’Alessio, M.; Lucio, J.; Williams, E.; Warner, J.; Seymour, D.; Jasperse, J.; Ray, C. Flow Analysis through Collector Well Laterals: A Case Study from Sonoma County Water Agency, California. Water 2018, 10, 1848.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top