Next Article in Journal
Temperature-Phased Biological Hydrolysis and Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment for Anaerobic Digestion Performance Enhancement
Previous Article in Journal
Projected Changes in Hydrological Variables in the Agricultural Region of Alberta, Canada
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2018, 10(12), 1811; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121811

ScoRE—A Simple Approach to Select a Water Quality Model

1
MARETEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
2
AQUALOGUS, Rua do Mar da China N° 1 Escritório 2.4, Parque das Nações, 1990-137 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 October 2018 / Revised: 30 November 2018 / Accepted: 6 December 2018 / Published: 9 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management and Governance)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2038 KB, uploaded 9 December 2018]   |  

Abstract

Over the past decades, water quality models have become unique tools in the management of aquatic resources. A consequence of their widespread application is the significant number of models now available. Available methodologies to compare models provide limited support for their choice in the first place, especially to end-users or modelers with limited experience. Here we propose a method to assist in the selection of a particular model from a set of apparently similar models. The method is termed ScoRE, as it grades models according to three main aspects: Scope (aim, simulated processes, constituents, etc.), Record (reference to the model in publications, its range of applications, etc.), and the Experience of using the model from the user perspective (support material, graphical user interface, etc.). End-users define the criteria to be evaluated and their relative importance, as well as the conditions for model exclusion. The evaluation of models is still performed by the modelers, in open discussion with end-users. ScoRE is a complete approach, as it provides guidance not only to exclude models but also to select the most appropriate model for a particular situation. An application of this method is provided to illustrate its use in the choice of a model. The application resulted in the definition of 18 criteria, where 6 of these were defined exclusively by the end-users. Based on these and the relative importance of each criterion, ScoRE produced a ranking of models, facilitating model selection. The results illustrate how the contributions from modelers and end-users are integrated to select a model for a particular task. View Full-Text
Keywords: water-quality modeling; model choice; CE-QUAL-W2; MIKE HYDRO River; MOHID Water; SIMCAT; SisBaHIA; TOMCAT; QUAL2Kw; WASP7 water-quality modeling; model choice; CE-QUAL-W2; MIKE HYDRO River; MOHID Water; SIMCAT; SisBaHIA; TOMCAT; QUAL2Kw; WASP7
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mateus, M.; Vieira, R.S.; Almeida, C.; Silva, M.; Reis, F. ScoRE—A Simple Approach to Select a Water Quality Model. Water 2018, 10, 1811.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top