Next Article in Journal
Monitoring and Modeling the Long-Term Rainfall-Runoff Response of the Jacob K. Javits Center Green Roof
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Analysis of Sensitivity of Structure of the Stratification in Lake Biwa, Japan by Changing Meteorological Elements
Open AccessArticle

A Multi-Criteria Assessment of Water Supply in Ugandan Refugee Settlements

1
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet, Building 115, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
2
Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet, Building 372, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(10), 1493; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101493
Received: 21 September 2018 / Revised: 12 October 2018 / Accepted: 15 October 2018 / Published: 22 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management and Governance)
Water supply challenges in emergency situations have increased in recent years and there is a need for analyses targeting economic and environmental sustainability. Our study investigated the end-user water demand, the capital and operational costs, the carbon footprint, the freshwater availability and the risks surrounding water quality for several groundwater supply alternatives in Ugandan refugee settlements. We compared hand pumps, motorised pumps (solar, diesel and hybrid) and water trucking. The end-users’ survey highlighted the significant variability of water access. The economic evaluation showed that the breakeven year for solar and diesel pumps was greatly affected by the length of the water distribution systems (e.g., pipes, storage tanks), the chosen timeframe and the daily working hours of the diesel engine. When excluding capital investment, most alternatives were economically viable at the existing water fee (0.8 USD/m3), and solar driven pumps were down to 0.09 USD/m3. Finally, the combustion of diesel caused the highest CO2-eq emissions per m3. Water trucking is the worst option in both the economic and environmental analysis at 7–8 USD/m3 and >1 kg CO2-eq/m3. The methodology and the results of this paper will support decision-makers to build and finance sustainable water provision solutions in refugee settlements. View Full-Text
Keywords: humanitarian emergencies; solar pumps; water pumps; cost-benefit analysis; carbon footprint; sustainability assessment humanitarian emergencies; solar pumps; water pumps; cost-benefit analysis; carbon footprint; sustainability assessment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Andreasi Bassi, S.; Tange, I.; Holm, B.; Boldrin, A.; Rygaard, M. A Multi-Criteria Assessment of Water Supply in Ugandan Refugee Settlements. Water 2018, 10, 1493.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop