Next Article in Journal
Tools for Communicating Agricultural Drought over the Brazilian Semiarid Using the Soil Moisture Index
Previous Article in Journal
Automated Floodway Determination Using Particle Swarm Optimization
Open AccessTechnical Note

Verification and Correction of the Hydrologic Routing in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool

1
Institute of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Universität Hannover, Appelstraße 9A, 30167 Hannover, Germany
2
Thuy Loi University, 175 Tay Son, Hanoi, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(10), 1419; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101419
Received: 10 September 2018 / Revised: 4 October 2018 / Accepted: 9 October 2018 / Published: 10 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology and Hydrogeology)
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is one of the most widely used eco-hydrological models. SWAT has been undergoing constant changes since its development. However, compartment review and testing of SWAT, especially the hydrologic routing functions, are comparably limited. In this study, the daily hydrologic routing subroutines of different SWAT versions were reviewed and tested using a well observed segment of the Weser River located in Germany. Results show several problems with the routing subroutines of SWAT. The variable storage subroutine of SWAT (Revision 664) does not transform the stream flow. Unphysical results could be obtained with the variable storage routing of SWAT (Revision 528). The Muskingum subroutine of SWAT (Revisions 664 and 528) overestimates daily channel evaporation (resulting in a bias of up to 6.3% in streamflow in our case studies) and underestimates daily transmission losses. Simulated results show that the timing and shape of flood waves, as well as the volume of low flows, could be improved with a corrected Muskingum subroutine. Based on the results of this study, we suggest that the SWAT user community review their existing SWAT models to see how the aforementioned issues will affect their methods, findings, and conclusions. View Full-Text
Keywords: SWAT; hydrologic routing; flood routing; low flow; Muskingum; variable storage SWAT; hydrologic routing; flood routing; low flow; Muskingum; variable storage
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, V.T.; Dietrich, J.; Uniyal, B.; Tran, D.A. Verification and Correction of the Hydrologic Routing in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Water 2018, 10, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101419

AMA Style

Nguyen VT, Dietrich J, Uniyal B, Tran DA. Verification and Correction of the Hydrologic Routing in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Water. 2018; 10(10):1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Van T.; Dietrich, Jörg; Uniyal, Bhumika; Tran, Dang A. 2018. "Verification and Correction of the Hydrologic Routing in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool" Water 10, no. 10: 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101419

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop