Next Article in Journal
The Dynamical Linkage of Atmospheric Blocking to Drought, Heatwave and Urban Heat Island in Southeastern US: A Multi-Scale Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimate of Hurricane Wind Speed from AMSR-E Low-Frequency Channel Brightness Temperature Data
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement in the Modeled Representation of North American Monsoon Precipitation Using a Modified Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization Scheme
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of a Spectral Nudging Technique to Determine the Impact of Environmental Factors on the Track of Typhoon Megi (2010)
Open AccessArticle

Decision Science Perspectives on Hurricane Vulnerability: Evidence from the 2010–2012 Atlantic Hurricane Seasons

1
Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
2
Abess Center for Ecosystem Science and Policy and RSMAS, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA
3
School for International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
4
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2018, 9(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010032
Received: 1 September 2017 / Revised: 12 January 2018 / Accepted: 17 January 2018 / Published: 20 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tropical Cyclones and Their Impacts)
Although the field has seen great advances in hurricane prediction and response, the economic toll from hurricanes on U.S. communities continues to rise. We present data from Hurricanes Earl (2010), Irene (2011), Isaac (2012), and Sandy (2012) to show that individual and household decisions contribute to this vulnerability. From phone surveys of residents in communities threatened by impending hurricanes, we identify five decision biases or obstacles that interfere with residents’ ability to protect themselves and minimize property damage: (1) temporal and spatial myopia, (2) poor mental models of storm risk, (3) gaps between objective and subjective probability estimates, (4) prior storm experience, and (5) social factors. We then discuss ways to encourage better decision making and reduce the economic and emotional impacts of hurricanes, using tools such as decision defaults (requiring residents to opt out of precautions rather than opt in) and tailoring internet-based forecast information so that it is local, specific, and emphasizes impacts rather than probability. View Full-Text
Keywords: tropical cyclone impact on humans; natural hazards; decision making; choice architecture; hurricanes tropical cyclone impact on humans; natural hazards; decision making; choice architecture; hurricanes
MDPI and ACS Style

Milch, K.; Broad, K.; Orlove, B.; Meyer, R. Decision Science Perspectives on Hurricane Vulnerability: Evidence from the 2010–2012 Atlantic Hurricane Seasons. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 32.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop