Influence of Decarbonization on Selected Parameters of ICE
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Methods of Experimental Measurements
- Carry out measurements of the technical, emission and fuel consumption of the ICE before decarbonization, which consisted of the following parts:
- (a)
- to perform a test of the emission state of an ICE using the free acceleration method in accordance with the Decree of the Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic No. 38/2022 Coll. on details of emission control [24],
- (b)
- measure ICE power while monitoring emissions and fuel consumption.
- Carry out decarbonization of the ICE.
- Carry out measurements of the technical, emission condition and fuel consumption of the ICE after decarbonization, which consisted of the following parts:
- (a)
- to perform a test of the emission state of an ICE using the free acceleration method in accordance with the Decree of the Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic No. 38/2022 Coll. on details of emission control,
- (b)
- measure ICE power while monitoring emissions and fuel consumption.
- Equipment preparation: The CCS 1000 includes a hydraulic vent and a hose connected to the engine intake manifold.
- Engine starting: The vehicle engine is started and warmed up to operating temperature.
- Hydrogen–oxygen mixing gas consumption: After engine warm-up, the hose from the CCS 1000 is connected to the intake manifold, allowing the hydrogen–oxygen mixture gas to flow into the combustion chamber.
- Hydrogen–oxygen mixture gas injection: A small amount of hydrogen–oxygen mixture of gas is injected into the combustion chamber. As the air mixture enters the combustion chamber, its components react with the carbon and coke that accumulate in the engine.
- Process completion: After decarbonization, the engine is shut down and disconnected from its CCS 1000.
3. Results
3.1. Monitoring of the Emission State by the Free Acceleration Method before the Decarbonization Process
3.2. Measurement of Technical Parameters, Emission Parameters and Fuel Consumption When Loading an ICE before the Decarbonization Process
3.3. Decarbonization of the ICE
3.4. Monitoring of the Emission State by the Free Acceleration Method after the Decarbonization Process
3.5. Measurement of Technical Parameters, Emission Parameters and Fuel Consumption When Loading an ICE after the Decarbonization Process
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sloboda, A.; Pil’a, J.; Sloboda, O.; Korba, P.; Hovanec, M.; Rácek, B. Vibrodiagnostic of aircraft hydraulic emergency hydrogenerator NP 27T. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 138, 106337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janoško, I.; Kuchar, P. Evaluation of the fuel commercial additives effect on exhaust gas emissions, fuel consumption and performance in diesel and petrol engine. Agron. Res. 2018, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niezawodność, A.K.-E. Exhaust Emission Test Performance with the Use of the Signal from Air Flow Meter. Eksploat. I Niezawodn. 2015, 17, 129–134. [Google Scholar]
- Pourdarbani, R.; Ardabili, S.; Akbarpouran, E.; Hernandez-Hernandez, J.L. Exergo-Environmental Optimization of a Diesel Engine. Acta Technol. Agric. 2022, 25, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leach, F.; Kalghatgi, G.; Stone, R.; Miles, P. The scope for improving the efficiency and environmental impact of internal combustion engines. Transp. Eng. 2020, 1, 100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Valencia, L.; Camenzind, D.; Wigmosta, M.; Garcia-Perez, M.; Wolcott, M. Biomass supply chain equipment for renewable fuels production: A review. Biomass-Bioenergy 2021, 148, 106054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, J.; Brito, F.P. Alternative Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines. Energies 2020, 13, 4086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulski, M.; Wierzbicki, S.; Niezawodność, A.P.-E. Zero-Dimensional 2-Phase Combustion Model in a Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Engine Fed with Gaseous Fuel and a Divided Diesel Fuel Charge. Eksploat. I Niezawodn. 2015, 17, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelovič, M.; Jablonický, J.; Tkáč, Z.; Angelovič, M. Comparison of Smoke Emissions in Different Combustion Engine Fuels. Acta Technol. Agric. 2020, 23, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Čedík, J.; Pexa, M.; Peterka, B.; Holůbek, M.; Mader, D.; Pražan, R. Effect of Biobutanol-Sunflower Oil-Diesel Fuel Blends on Combustion Characteristics of Compression Ignition Engine. Acta Technol. Agric. 2018, 21, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nadykto, V.; Findura, P.; Kyurchev, V.; Orel, O. Influence of Biodiesel on Performance of Machine-Tractor Units. Acta Technol. Agric. 2022, 25, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemi, F.; Pourdarbani, R.; Ardabili, S.; Hernandez-Hernandez, J.L. Life Cycle Assessment of a Hybrid Self-Power Diesel Engine. Acta Technol. Agric. 2023, 26, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebos, I. Fossil Fraction of CO2 Emissions of Biofuels. Carbon Manag. 2022, 13, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annual European Union Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2019 and Inventory Report 2021—European Environment Agency. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/annual-european-union-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2021 (accessed on 5 October 2022).
- International Energy Outlook 2019 with Projections to 2050. Available online: https://slidetodoc.com/international-energy-outlook-2019-with-projections-to-2050-2/ (accessed on 5 October 2022).
- Kalghatgi, G. Is It Really the End of ICEs and Petroleum in Transport? Appl. Energy 2018, 225, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senecal, P.K.; Leach, F. Diversity in Transportation: Why a Mix of Propulsion Technologies Is the Way Forward for the Future Fleet. Results Eng. 2019, 4, 100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuinhas, J.A.; Koengkan, M.; Leitão, N.C.; Nwani, C.; Uzuner, G.; Dehdar, F.; Relva, S.; Peyerl, D. Effect of Battery Electric Vehicles on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 29 European Union Countries. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MaMa, H.; Balthasar, F.; Tait, N.; Riera-Palou, X.; Harrison, A. A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles. Energy Policy 2012, 44, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merkisz, J.; Rymaniak, Ł. The Assessment of Vehicle Exhaust Emissions Referred to CO2 Based on the Investigations of City Buses under Actual Conditions of Operation. Eksploat. I. Niezawodn. 2017, 19, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gill, S.S.; Chatha, G.S.; Tsolakis, A.; Golunski, S.E.; York, A.P.E. Assessing the effects of partially decarbonising a diesel engine by co-fuelling with dissociated ammonia. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 6074–6083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, M.L.; Lewis, A.C. Decarbonisation of heavy-duty diesel engines using hydrogen fuel: A review of the potential impact on NOx emissions. Environ. Sci. Atmos. 2022, 2, 852–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devalekar, P.; Bagkar, M.; Jadhav, A.; Manchikatla, K.; Rawool, S. Review on Engine Decarbonisation Process. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Technol. 2016, 3, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
- Methodological Instruction no. 38/2022, Amending Methodological Instruction no. 2/2020 for Carrying Out Regular Emission Control of Motor Vehicles with a Petrol Engine with an Unimproved Emission System, with a Petrol Engine with an Improved Emission System and with Diesel Engine as Amended. Available online: https://www.seka.sk/storage/app/media/stranky/legislativa/metodiky/2023/mp-38-2022.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Okay Energy. Available online: https://www.okayenergy.com/oxyhydrogen/hho-engine-carbon-cleaning-machine.html (accessed on 3 August 2023).
- Abdelhameed, E.; Tashima, H. EGR and Emulsified Fuel Combination Effects on the Combustion, Performance, and NOx Emissions in Marine Diesel Engines. Energies 2023, 16, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Engine Code | ALH |
---|---|
Number of cylinders | 4 |
Valve distribution | OHC |
Cylinder capacity, cm3 | 1896 |
Fuel injection pump | VE/BOSCH |
Maximum torque | 210 Nm |
Speed at max. torque | 1900 rpm |
Maximum power | 66 kW |
Speed at max. performance | 3750 rpm |
Measurement Conditions | |
---|---|
Idle Speed | 910 ± 30 rpm |
Limiting speed | 4900–5100 rpm |
Oil temperature | 80 °C |
Idle speed when measuring smoke | 880–9440 rpm |
Limiting speed when measuring smoke | 4900–5100 rpm |
Max. time at limiting speed | 0.5 s |
A/B measurement mode | B |
Measuring probe 1/2 | 1 |
Technical Data of Carbon Cleaner System CCS 1000 | |
---|---|
AC voltage requirement | 220~240 V, single phase |
AC current | <15 A |
Rated power | 3.5 kW |
Max. gas flow | 1000 ± 10% dm3 h−1 |
Max. working pressure | 2 MPa |
Max. water consumption | 0.6 dm3 h−1 |
Weight | 80 kg |
Measured Gases | HC, CO, CO2, O2, NO, NO2, NOx |
---|---|
Flow | 3.5 dm3 rpm |
CO—Measuring range/measured value resolution (max.) | 0–15% Vol./0.01 |
CO2—Measuring range/resolution of measured values (max.) | 0–20% Vol./0.01 |
HC—Measuring range/measured value resolution (max.) | 0–9999 ppm/0.1 |
HC—Measuring range/measured value resolution (max.) | 0–25% Vol./0.01 |
Lambda (calculated) | 0.5–9.99/0.01 |
Measurement principle | Absorption measurement |
Measuring chamber heating time approx. | 150 s |
Particle concentration measuring range | 1–1100 mg m−3 |
Particle concentration resolution | 1 |
Turbidity of the measuring range | 0–100% |
Absorption coefficient of the measuring range | 0–9.99 m−1 |
Resolution absorption coefficient | 9.99 m−1 |
Measurement Principle | Volumetric, Oscillating Piston, with Microprocessor Controlled Transmitter |
---|---|
Measuring range | 1 to 120 dm3 h−1 |
The accuracy of measuring | 1% |
Repeatability | 0.2% |
Permissible pressure | −1–6 bar |
Mounting position | horizontal |
Operating temperature | −30…90 °C |
Coverage | IP 67 |
Power supply | 8–28 VDC |
Pulse signal | Rectangular NPN, open collector, pulse width 0.7 ms |
Pulse rate | 2000 ppl |
Max. viscosity | 100 mPa s |
Designed for engines | do 522 kW or 120 dm3 h−1 |
Cylinder diameter | 205 mm |
Rolling circumference | 1538 mm |
Length of cylinders | 750 mm |
Wheelbase (min … max.) | 700–2200 mm |
Total weight of the roller set | 4130 kg |
Mech. inertia mass | 2 × 800 kg |
Permissible axle load | 2500 kg |
Top speed | 300 km h−1 |
Top speed of the next non-driven axle | cca 200 km h−1 |
Electric motor power | 2 × 22 kW |
Wheel power front axle static/dynamic | 260/1000 kW |
Wheel power rear axle static/dynamic | 260/1000 kW |
Traction force front axle | approx. 7000 N |
Traction force rear axle | approx. 7000 N |
Protection with/without drive | 63 A |
Voltage supply | 3 × 400 V + N + PE |
Measurement | Value k, m−1 | Idle Speed nv, rpm | Control Speed nr, rpm | Engine Oil Temperature tm, °C | Acceleration Time ta, s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 0.60 | 902 | 4770 | 83 | 1.34 |
2. | 0.48 | 902 | 4950 | 84 | 1.48 |
3. | 0.49 | 904 | 5030 | 85 | 1.59 |
Dispersion R, m−1 | 0.12 | ||||
Average value of absorption coefficient k, m−1 | 0.52 |
Measurement | Value k, m−1 | Idle Speed nv, rpm | Control Speed nr, rpm | Engine Oil Temperature tm, °C | Acceleration Time ta, s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 0.39 | 905 | 5040 | 84 | 1.40 |
2. | 0.18 | 906 | 5030 | 86 | 1.68 |
3. | 0.7 | 905 | 4990 | 87 | 1.83 |
Dispersion R, m−1 | 0.22 | ||||
Average value of absorption coefficient k, m−1 | 0.25 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jablonický, J.; Tulík, J.; Bártová, S.; Tkáč, Z.; Kosiba, J.; Kuchar, P.; Čorňák, Š.; Kollárová, K.; Kaszkowiak, J.; Tomić, M.; et al. Influence of Decarbonization on Selected Parameters of ICE. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081271
Jablonický J, Tulík J, Bártová S, Tkáč Z, Kosiba J, Kuchar P, Čorňák Š, Kollárová K, Kaszkowiak J, Tomić M, et al. Influence of Decarbonization on Selected Parameters of ICE. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(8):1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081271
Chicago/Turabian StyleJablonický, Juraj, Juraj Tulík, Simona Bártová, Zdenko Tkáč, Ján Kosiba, Peter Kuchar, Štefan Čorňák, Katarína Kollárová, Jerzy Kaszkowiak, Milan Tomić, and et al. 2023. "Influence of Decarbonization on Selected Parameters of ICE" Atmosphere 14, no. 8: 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081271
APA StyleJablonický, J., Tulík, J., Bártová, S., Tkáč, Z., Kosiba, J., Kuchar, P., Čorňák, Š., Kollárová, K., Kaszkowiak, J., Tomić, M., & Paumer, M. (2023). Influence of Decarbonization on Selected Parameters of ICE. Atmosphere, 14(8), 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081271