Next Article in Journal
Gaseous and Particulate Pollution in the Wu-Chang-Shi Urban  Agglomeration on the Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains from 2017 to 2021
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial Patterns in the Extreme Dependence of Ozone Pollution between Cities in China’s BTH Region
Previous Article in Journal
Application of New Modified Genetic Algorithm in Inverse Calculation of Strong Source Location
Previous Article in Special Issue
Atmospheric Conditions for Uplift and Dust Transport in the Latitudinal 10° North–20° North Band in Africa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Air Pollution Exposure and Daily Outpatient Visits for Dry Eye Disease: A Time-Series Study in Urumqi, China

1
Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei 230601, China
2
Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
3
Department of Clinical Medicine, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
4
Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
5
Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle (Anhui Medical University), Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
6
Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Population Health and Aristogenics, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
7
Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 Liyu Shan Road, Urumqi 830011, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Atmosphere 2023, 14(1), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010090
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 31 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Statistical Methods in Atmospheric Research)

Abstract

:
The potential effects of air pollution on the ocular surface environment have not been fully evaluated, and even fewer studies have been conducted on the lagged effects of air pollution on dry eye disease (DED). The data of 9970 DED outpatients between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2020, and data for six air pollutants, including PM10, PM2.5, carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3), were obtained from 11 standard urban background stationary air quality monitors in Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. Time series analysis design and quasi-Poisson generalized linear regression models combined with distributed lagged nonlinear models (DLNM) were used. Single- and multi-pollutant model results suggest that each additional per 10 μg/m3 of PM10, NO2, and SO2 is associated with an increased risk of outpatient DED on lag day 0 and PM2.5, NO2, and SO2 with other cumulative lag days; R software version 4.0.4 (15 February 2021) was used for the analysis. We conducted first time series analysis with a large sample size in northwest China (Xinjiang) and confirmed, for the first time, the impact of air pollution including particulate pollutants (PM10, PM2.5) and acidic gasses (SO2, NO2) on DED risk in the Urumqi region, and suggested the potential lagged effects of PM2.5, SO2, and NO2.

1. Introduction

Air pollution is known to be associated with cardiovascular disease, stroke [1], asthma [2], and some ocular diseases [3,4,5]. These diseases have attracted significant societal attention. However, the potential effects of air pollution on the ocular surface environment are often overlooked. At the same time, studies on the lagged effects of air pollution on ocular diseases are limited, with insufficient sample size and time span.
Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular surface disorder with clinical manifestations, such as redness, increased discharge, and visual fatigue. Clinical manifestations are exacerbated in environments such as high winds and is thought to be related to ocular surface damage and impaired tear film stability [6,7]. DED prevalence has increased every year in recent years, with approximately 7.8% (3.23 million) of American women and 4.7% (1.68 million) of American men over 50 years of age reported to be affected [8], and it is even higher in Asia [9]. Another survey in Canada that included all age groups found that approximately 60.7% of DED patients were women, and women also made up most of the severe DED population [10]. The prevalence of DED in China is 17–21% [11], and it is even higher in outpatients (61.57%) [11,12]. Yu Donghui et al. published a new national survey on the prevalence of outpatient DED in China in 2019. They surveyed 23,922 eligible patients with DED registered in outpatient ophthalmology clinics in 32 cities in China and discovered that the prevalence of DED among outpatients was 61.57%, with 57.64% in men and 65.32% in women [12]. A systematic review and meta-analysis reported that the prevalence in western and northern China was significantly higher than in the southeastern area, which strongly suggests the potential importance of regional factors. DED has become a growing public health problem worldwide, particularly in China, due to its impact on daily activities and quality of life [6,13].
Previous research has linked some risk factors with DED, such as age, gender, and smoking status, as well as the prevalence of electronic devices, such as smartphones and computers. Chronic lack of sleep and fatigued eye use also contribute to the development of DED [13,14]. However, research on air pollution is still limited [11,15,16] because the corneal and conjunctival epithelia are separated from the air by a superficial tear film. Penetrating air pollutants can cause conjunctival dysfunction and imbalance in the ocular environment through this specific structure, and recent studies have also supported that air pollution can cause subclinical changes in the ocular surface [17,18,19]. There has been evidence suggesting that air pollution appears to be strongly associated with DED; this may be related to the type of pollutant as well as the lagged effect. However, until now, there have been relatively few relevant studies [17,18,20,21].
Urumqi is the capital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (hereinafter referred to as “Xinjiang”), which is in northwest China. Urumqi is characterized by large temperature differences between day and night, dryness, and extreme weather, such as sand-dust storms. The harsh climatic conditions have resulted in Urumqi covering a vast area, but with few habitable sites, showing a dotted distribution and a vast uninhabited area. In recent decades, as the world’s farthest inland city from the ocean and the political, economic, cultural, scientific, educational, and transportation center of Xinjiang, Urumqi has become one of the most rapidly growing large cities in western China. The high proportion of road transport and local industrial pollution has significantly increased in Urumqi, exacerbating the region’s poor air quality. To our knowledge, there have been no studies examining the relationship between air pollution and eye health in Urumqi, not to mention DED. The limited research evidence has been mainly concentrated on eastern cities, but the central and western regions should receive more attention due to their special climatic conditions and population distribution characteristics [22].
In this study, we aimed to systematically investigate the relationship between six major air pollutants and DED outpatient visits in the Urumqi region. We investigated the types of different air pollutants and their lagged effects of DED over a long period of time. We also analyzed the effects of individual characteristics through a time-series design with separate tests of the distribution of factors, such as patient gender, age, and season. We conducted these researches in order to further understand and address this growing public health problem.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

This study was conducted in the city of Urumqi, in the central part of Xinjiang province in northwest China and the center of the Asia-Europe continent. There are seven districts and one county with a total area of 13,800 square kilometers. With a resident population of 4.07 million in 2021, Urumqi has a medium-temperate continental arid climate. The hottest months are July and August, when the average temperature is 25.7 °C, and the coldest month is January, when the average temperature is −15.2 °C. Coal carbon energy utilization and high proportions of road transport are the main sources of local air pollution.

2.2. Study Population

We conducted this retrospective time-series analysis study in the ophthalmology department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Urumqi, Xinjiang, China), which is the largest and most popular medical institution in Xinjiang. We obtained clinical outpatient data from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020 in this hospital. The hospital has the largest and most modern ophthalmology clinic in Xinjiang province. As a hospital under the supervision of the Chinese Ministry of Health, it is considered “one of the top ten in China and the first in Northwest China” and has received many awards and general recognition from medical colleagues. It is the leader in the treatment of ocular surface diseases such as DED in Xinjiang province, and it has conducted many epidemiological surveys of eye diseases in the province. As a result, it has become the preferred and most favored medical institution for patients with eye diseases in Xinjiang and surrounding areas, including Urumqi.
Outpatient visit information was extracted from the electronic medical record system, including date of visit, diagnosis, and basic details such as gender, age, and current and permanent residence (zip codes). We prioritized the inclusion of the current address for follow-up studies when there were discrepancies in the above location information. Our study only focused on primary care patients, excluding emergency patients and those who had lived in Urumqi for less than 6 months, to reduce potential bias.
The International Classification of Diseases standard code [ICD-10] ophthalmology section was used for diagnosis, and H11.103 represents DED. In addition, we examined the diagnostic entries for DED in the outpatient medical records and the corresponding chief complaints, as well as ophthalmologic examinations. The final diagnostic information included was reviewed by physicians with intermediate or higher qualifications in the department or by the corresponding attending physicians to ensure the accuracy of the diagnosis and data classification. The geographical location of the hospital is shown in Figure 1 and Supplementary Material B.

2.3. Atmospheric Pollutants and Meteorological Data

All public meteorological data including daily average temperature (°C), relative humidity (%), and atmospheric pressure (hPa) were obtained from the China Meteorological Data Sharing Service (http://data.cma.cn, accessed on 10 December 2022). PM2.5 (daily 24-h average), PM10 (daily 24-h average), CO (daily 24-h average), NO2 (daily 24-h average), SO2 (daily 24-h average), and O3 (maximum daily 8-h average) were obtained from 11 standard urban background fixed-point air quality monitoring stations in Urumqi. Shoufisho (SFS), Sanshi Yizhong (SHYZ), Wenquan (WQ), Hongguang Mountain (HGS), Green Valley (LG), Xinjiang Nongken (XJNK), Jianshishan (JCZ), Railway Residence (TLJ), and Midong Baohuju (MDBHJ). Daban Baoju (DBBHJ), Peixun Jidi (PXJD), and the latitude, longitude, and distribution of each site are shown in Figure 1 and Supplementary Material B.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Correlation analysis between air pollutants and meteorological factors in the Urumqi region was performed by Spearman correlation coefficient analysis with the R package. The “seasons” package was used to set alternative values for the control groups in the model. “Day of the week (DOW)” was used as an indicator variable to reconcile long-term trends, seasonal pattern effects, and day-of-the-week effects. To assess potential lagged effects of air pollutants, lags of up to 7 days were included in the model for cumulative and non-cumulative exposures, similar to the methodology of similar previously published studies. For example, cumulative effects were the average concentration effect for lags 0-n days and non-cumulative effects defined as the exposure effect for lags 0 to lags n days before [22,23]. The maximum value of relative risk (RR) and the minimum value of p were used to calculate the optimal lag date for each lag model.
Considering that daily outpatient visits for DED are considered rare events that approximate a quasi-Poisson distribution, we used a quasi-Poisson generalized linear regression model with a distributed lagged nonlinear model (DLNM) to fit the effect of exposure to air pollutants on DED visits. Our research hypothesis is based on a few similar studies of the same type that have been published, in which the type and level of air pollution were associated with the onset of DED. Increased levels of six major air pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, O3, and CO) may increase the risk of DED outpatient visits, and this correlation has lag effects, while meteorological factors were one of the important confounding factors. Previous studies have suggested that meteorological factors such as temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) influence the stability of the tear film and the incidence of DED, so the effect of confounding variables of meteorological factors (T, RH, AP) was controlled by smoothing the natural cubic spline curve (ns) with three degrees of freedom (df). The choice of df was determined as the minimum of the sum of the absolute values of the partial autocorrelation function (PACF), which were based on the residuals of the underlying model consistent with the residual independence principle [22,24].
DED diagnostic records with no missing information (n = 64,613) were screened first, followed by those with permanent residents living within 20 km of the nearest air quality monitoring site on average (n = 64,613), according to the Baidu Map 0.2 package in the R software. The meteorological factors were used as covariates and the final model is shown below:
Yt ~ quasiPoisson   ( μ t )
Log [ E ( Yt ) ] = & β Z t + factor ( DOW ) + ns ( time , df = 7 / year ) + ns ( T , df = 3 ) + ns ( RH , df = 3 ) + ns ( AP , df = 3 ) + ns ( NO 2 , df = 3 ) + ns ( O 3 , df = 3 ) + ns ( SO 2 , df = 3 ) + ns ( CO , df = 3 ) + ns ( PM 2.5 , df = 3 ) + ns ( PM 10 , df = 3 ) + intercept
where E(Yt) denotes the expected number of DED outpatients on day t, Zt is the concentration of certain pollutants on day t, and β is the exposure coefficient; ns is the natural cubic spline function; df is the degree of freedom; DOW denotes the day of the week, RH, and AP represent the mean air temperature, relative humidity, and atmospheric pressure, respectively. We report the RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous exposure (per 10 units increase compared to the average background exposure level).
Furthermore, we performed subgroup analyses for sex (male, female) and age (0–1, 2–5, 6–18, 19–64, and ≥65 years) to further explore potential moderating factors. Differences between the warm season (April to September) and the cool season (January to March and October to December) were statistically analyzed by using packages including “season”, “dlnm”, and “splines” in R software version 4.0.4 (15 February 2021). Statistical tests were all two-sided, and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University approved and supervised the study in its entirety, and the process was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (No. K202205-08).

3. Results

Final data from 9970 eligible cases were included in the current study, and Table 1 describes the basic characteristics of patients with DED included from 2013 to 2020, similar to the results of previous studies. Final data described that the number of female patients remained in the majority, approximately three times the number of males (72.63%), and patients aged 19–64 years (78.13%) made up the majority of the total age group; the prevalence of DED was as well slightly higher in the warm season than in the cold season (50.84%). In general, during this eight-year period, there appears to be an annual cyclical trend for the six regional air pollutants and DED outpatient visits, with CO, SO2, and O3 falling below China’s national ambient air quality standards, but NO2, PM2.5, and PM10 exceeding these standards. Please see Table 1 for more information. The main meteorological factors also presented cyclical variations during the period 2013–2020, with temperature variations ranging from −26.0 to 35.1 °C, humidity from 6.0 to 100.0%, air pressure from 842.0 to 934.0 hPa, and wind speed from 0.0 to 14.8 m/s, with mean values of 8.4 °C, 55.5%, 912.7 hPa, and 2 m/s, respectively. Details of the remaining descriptive analysis indicators (standard deviation (SD), minimum, 25th and 75th percentiles, median, and maximum) and cycle variation characteristics are shown in Figure 2 and Figure S1.
As shown in Figure 3, we reported correlations between the four main meteorological factors and six air pollutants by Spearman analysis, with the strongest correlation between PM2.5 and CO (r = 0.86, p-value < 0.0001) and a high correlation with NO2 (r = 0.82, p-value < 0.0001). The results showed that correlations between particulate matter and other gaseous pollutants or between different air pollutants were also present to varying degrees (p-value < 0.0001).
In the single-day lagged effects model for exposure to single pollutants, we reported RRs with 95% CIs for each 10-unit increase in six air pollutants with the risk of DED. CO and O3 were not significantly associated with the risk of DED outpatient visits, while the remaining four air pollutants were revealed to have a weak positive association with the risk of DED. Specifically, on day 0 increases in PM10, SO2, and NO2 per 10 units were statistically significantly correlated with rising DED outpatient visits (1.01, 1.09, and 1.08, respectively). Cumulative lagged results suggested that increases in DED outpatient visits from lag 0–1 day to 0–7 days were positively and statistically correlated with increased NO2 per 10 μg/m3 increase (RR values range from a minimum of 1.06 to a maximum of 1.07, and all were statistically significant correlations). Similar results were found for PM2.5; RR values ranged from a minimum of 1.04 to a maximum of 1.06 at lags 0–4 to 0–7 days, and all were statistically significant correlations. For SO2 (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19), it was statistically significantly associated with DED at lags 0–2 days. In addition, there appeared to be no detectable correlation between other pollutants and DED outpatient visits in the single pollutant model (Table 2).
Combining the results of the multi-pollutant model (Table 3), we failed to find significant correlations between CO and O3 and the risk of DED outpatient visits, but NO2, SO2, and PM2.5 showed statistically significant correlations between per 10 μg/m3 increase and outpatient visits of DED patients. Furthermore, because the findings in single and multi-pollutant models were inconsistent, it was unclear whether there was a statistically significant correlation between increased PM10 exposure and DED outpatient visits. In addition, we conducted a sensitivity analysis on the data for different years (2013–2017, 2013–2018, and 2013–2019), the results suggest that these findings remained stable (Supplementary Materials B).
Results of subgroup analysis based on individual patient characteristics showed no gender differences between air pollutants except NO2 and increased DED outpatient visits. In the age subgroup, the ≥65 years age group did not correlate with any air pollutant, while NO2 showed statistically significant correlations in the DED age groups 0–5 years, 6–18 years, and 19–64 years. Similar results were found for PM2.5. However, it was noteworthy that per 10-unit increase in SO2 showed the strongest correlation (RR = 2.57, 1.17–5.65) with a statistically significant rise in DED outpatient visits at age 0–5 years. In addition, O3 also showed a statistically significant correlation in DED in 6–18 years (RR = 1.09, 1.02–1.15) and the opposite effect was found in CO (19–64 years) versus PM2.5 (6–18 years). Moreover, increased DED outpatient visits during the warm season exhibited significant positive correlations with PM10 and CO per 10-unit increase, while significant correlations were found with all other air pollutants except for SO2 during the cold season, and the opposite effect was found in O3 (cold season). Details are shown in Table 4.
Considering the evidence of health effects of the association between long-term O3 concentrations and total mortality, 2021 WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines (AQG 2021) provided seasonal average O3 peak recommendations (60 µg/m3) [25]. Our results suggested that the annual average value of O3 in Urumqi (68.2 µg/m3) was slightly above this criterion, and our results failed to find a significant correlation between O3 and DED in both the single-pollutant and multi-pollutant models, but a significant correlation between O3 and the decline in DED outpatient visits during the cold season can be seen in the results of the subgroup analysis. This may be explained by the decrease in O3 levels during the cold season and the specific “U”-shaped dose response in the 5% to 95% dose range of O3 that we found in Figure 4.

4. Discussion

In this study, significant associations were found between air pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2) and outpatient visits for DED, with NO2 exhibiting the most significant effect in both the single-pollutant and multi-pollutant models, which was consistent with previous findings from similar studies on DED and air pollution in other regions [21]. Subgroup analysis results suggested stronger effects, with SO2 demonstrating the strongest effect in children aged 0–5 years; O3 only impacted the DED population aged 6–18 years. The most susceptible group was females (72.6% of the total number of patients were female). For PM10 and CO, the association between air pollutants and the number of DED outpatient visits was stronger in the warm season than in the cold season, while it was reversed for NO2 and PM2.5.
There was growing evidence indicating that air pollution was associated with DED [17,18,21]. Mu et al. reported that RRs for DED increased with levels of pollutants PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, SO2, and O3 in a time-series study investigating the relationship between air pollution exposure and daily pediatric visits for DED in Shenzhen [20]. Hwang et al., on the other hand, conducted a population-based cross-sectional study with 16,824 participants from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012, and discovered that symptoms and diagnosis of DED were significantly associated with increased O3 and NO2 exposure [21]. This was consistent with the results of a prospective observational study conducted between 2016 and 2018 by Kim et al. [26], which found no correlation between increased PM10 exposure and DED. Furthermore, Galor et al. discovered that environmental factors influenced DED risk in the U.S. veteran population, with air pollution emerging as the most influential predictor [27]. Similarly, in a case-crossover design and data from 25,818 eligible DED subjects in Taiwan from 2004 to 2013, Zhong et al. demonstrated that CO and NO2 were positively associated with DED visits (p < 0.05) [17]. Different study sites, air pollution levels, and study populations limited our integration of these findings. However, as the first study conducted in the largest city in northwest China, our findings provided new evidence in the field. We confirmed for the first time the effects of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NO2 on DED risk in Urumqi, and pointed out the potential lagged effects of PM2.5, SO2, and NO2. Sensitivity analyses for different years checked this conclusion. However, limitations due to the lack of validation must be considered.
As previously stated, the Urumqi region’s unique geographical characteristics of being far from the coast and climatic characteristics of frequent extreme weather, particularly the arid climate and coal-based energy consumption, have caused air pollutants to be poorly dispersed in the natural environment [28,29]. Therefore, it was critical to investigate local air-pollution-related health issues, considering policy development and disease prevention, etc. According to the Chinese Ministry of Ecology and Environment 2022’s interannual spatial distribution trends of six major air pollutants for 2013–2020 in 74 key cities, including Urumqi, all five air pollutants were higher in the northwest than in other regions (east and southwest), except for O3, and our results confirmed this (Table 1 and Figure 2). However, studies on the health risks of air pollution in this region, particularly ocular surface diseases, were scarce. A time-series study published in 2017 by China’s National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control investigated the effects of major air particulate pollution in 38 of the largest cities (total population >200 million) in 27 Chinese provinces, revealing that Urumqi, Xinjiang (with daily average PM10 concentrations as high as 136.0 g/m3), was the most polluted city [30]. Particulate pollutant concentrations had decreased in most parts of China as a result of environmental and energy-saving policies, but PM10 pollution remained a major issue in the northwest, particularly in Xinjiang [31]. Our results similarly confirm that the average PM10 value in Urumqi (120.2 μg/m3) was much higher than the average value in northwest China (67.73 μg/m3). Considering the correlation between PM10 and DED risk was observed, further PM10 detection and environmental cleanup and protection measures should be carried out in the region.
Long-term high concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 may be attributed to high tailpipe emissions from the developed local transportation industry, or to the suspended accumulation of particulate matter caused by frequent dust storm weather [32]. Kenji Kashiwagi et al. and Zihan Xu et al. both found that the strong association between short-term exposure to PM10 and DED diagnosis may be attributed to the direct reaction of small molecules of particulate matter with ocular surface tissues, impairing tear film function [33,34]. A large amount of dust and particulate matter can also enter the eye with tears to produce the subsequent chain reaction, as reflected in the cumulative lag effect of PM2.5 (cumulative lag of 0–4 to 0–7 days), which was consistent with the results of a previously published study from Taiwan [17].
In addition, NO2 has been widely demonstrated in other time-series studies to be significantly associated with an increasing incidence of ocular diseases, such as conjunctivitis [23]. Our results suggested that NO2 (48. 5 μg/m3) concentrations in the Urumqi region are still higher than in other regions (38.1 μg/m3 in Hefei, Anhui; 47.9 μg/m3 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang; and 21 μg/m3 in Taiwan), not to mention being higher than the WHO annual average NO2 target (10 μg/m3) during most of the year. Significant associations of NO2 with the cumulative lags of DED from 0–1 to 0–7 days were observed in both single-pollution and multi-pollution models, and the results of our correlation analysis suggested that NO2 is highly correlated with particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10). It was probably because they both derive from road traffic pollution generated by incomplete combustion of fuel inside engines [17]; it is worth noting that traffic emissions in Urumqi are mainly diesel exhaust containing potent oxidants, which may mediate the production of stress inflammation on the ocular surface. Usually, high concentrations of NO2 in direct contact with the ocular surface can acidify tears, and thus, lead to the reduction of tears, all of which are typical symptoms of DED [35].
Notably, our research found that the annual average SO2 concentration in Urumqi had been decreasing for eight consecutive years (Figure 1), with an annual decrease of more than 40%, possibly due to the local industrial desulfurization and “coal to gas” projects that began in 2010 [36]. However, our findings showed that SO2 was significantly associated with the risk of DED and had a cumulative lag effect of 0–2 days, which was strongest for children aged 0–5 years; this may be related to children’s increased exposure to outdoor air pollution [37], implying that additional local pollution control measures, such as coal combustion, are still needed.
Subgroup analysis suggested that the effect of air pollution on DED was influenced by gender, age, and cold and warm season, which were reflected to varying degrees in different types of air pollutants (see Table 4). It has been reported that the incidence of DED is significantly higher in women than in men [38]. DED affected women twice as much as men over the age of 50; in addition, it was diagnosed 6 years earlier in women than in men, which may be due to some female-specific factors unrelated to tear production, but the mechanism was unknown [39]. Estrogen may play a role in effectively inducing DED by antagonizing androgens’ protective effect on levator gland function [40]. Furthermore, it may be related to women’s lower resistance to external stimuli compared to men, as well as the type and composition of their different air exposure (e.g., cooking fumes) [41]. High sensitivity to NO2 in infants and young adults may be related to the excessive use of electronic devices in modern society [42], or the habit of wearing contact lenses in youths [43]. In addition, during the cold season, more frequent use of fuel combustion, such as coal, led to increased emissions of harmful substances, such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), and may cause high concentrations of environmental pollutants and increased DED cases [44].
Regarding the mechanism of effects of different air pollutants on DED, previous studies have reported a variety of potential mechanisms. NO2 and O3 were both oxidants with strong oxidizing properties, which can lead to a massive increase of some inflammatory cytokines in the tear fluid, such as IL-6, IL-1β, IFN-γ, and IL-17, and further cause an inflammatory response in the ocular surface [21,45]. This was also considered to be the core mechanism of DED [46]. In addition, some animal studies have shown that particulate matter (including PM2.5 and PM10) had similar properties, which caused ocular surface damage through oxidative stress and destabilization of the tear film [47]. Furthermore, SO2 and NO2, which are acidic gasses, can cause acidification of tears and alter the pH environment of the inner epidermal cells when they enter the eye, thereby irritating the ocular surface and causing inflammation [48,49]. Air pollutants also possessed the ability to alter the anterior corneal tear film, especially NO2 and CO, which are combustion products with aerosol properties that can invade the outermost lipid layer of the anterior corneal tear film; PM2.5 and PM10, which interfere with the structure of the anterior corneal tear film on direct contact, can easily cause ocular discomfort [50]. Moreover, previous animal experiments and clinical studies have shown that O3 and PM2.5 can reduce the density of conjunctival cupped cells [51]. The increase in PM2.5 concentration can also increase tear osmolarity and cause apoptosis of corneal epithelial cells, which can lead to dysfunction of ocular surface cells and eventually develop into dry eye disease [52,53].
In summary, this study has several strengths. First, we conducted the first time-series analysis design with a large-scale sample size in the largest city in northwest China. Second, our study provided new evidence in the field, confirming, for the first time, the effect of air pollution including PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NO2 on DED risk in Urumqi, and suggesting the potential lagged effect of PM2.5, SO2, and NO2. Third, we analyzed the effects of different types of air pollutants on DED in detail and detected the differences in the effects of gender and age, as well as cold and warm seasonal factors among local DED patients in Urumqi by subgroup analysis.
There were undeniably some limitations of our study:
First, although the Ophthalmology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University is the largest ophthalmology clinic in Xinjiang, and it attracted more than 50% of outpatient visits for DED patients as the preferred provider for patients with ophthalmic diseases in the surrounding area, it must be taken into account that there were several other ophthalmology clinics in the city, and, therefore, the omission of patients who visited other hospitals for proximity or other reasons must be taken into account.
Second, although we used both current and permanent postal addresses in the medical records to determine exposure addresses, and multiple procedures were also used to screen as many patients as possible who lived in the major areas of Urumqi, the data from fixed monitoring stations were closest to the individual’s residence. However, due to misregistration of information, there may still be postal address zip codes that differ from the actual area of residence and other occurrences that may undermine the validity of the study, and individual-level exposure and indoor contamination cannot be examined in detail. In addition, given the inherent limitations of the perspective retrospective ecological time-series design in investigating causality, especially since estimates of air pollutants and other measured parameters were not based on precise individual exposures, a time-to-event (TTE) study design may be a better alternative, because it not only takes into account the occurrence of the event but can also include the time of the event. Future designs based on mobile monitoring systems will be expected to provide accurate individual-level exposures, as well as indoor pollution, which are currently unavailable for detailed examination.
Third, the diagnosis of DED relied on electronic medical record information systems, and although appropriate review procedures were adopted, these data may be associated with misclassification bias due to errors when entering the data into the system. On the other hand, electronic medical record systems lacked some valuable information, such as socioeconomic status, education level or occupation, and DED subtypes, thus preventing us from further analyzing those effects of individual differences.
Fourth, multiple lifestyle factors, such as sleep status and electronic device use, as well as some occupational exposures, such as night shift workers and visual display terminal workers, may affect the estimated effect sizes. In addition, UV exposure, allergens such as pollen, atmospheric suspended particles or solvents (e.g., volatile chemicals) may also act as potential confounders in this study. As a result, future studies should take these difficult-to-measure confounding factors into full account.
Fifth, as previously stated, the quasi-Poisson generalized linear regression model with DLNM that we utilized allows the application of numerous parameters to account for effects at different lags, thus it flexibly characterizes the relationship of potential nonlinearities and lagged effects in time series data. Although this method is widely accepted and used in environmental-related health studies, different statistical models may influence the results. For example, as described in Zhang et al. [54], generalized linear regression can provide a simple relationship between single chemicals and outcomes, thus distributing the effects of individual exposure events over specific time periods. WQS models can explore the effects of mixed exposure burdens on outcomes in one direction at a time. The BKMR model can explore the exposure-response function of each chemical at a certain level and investigate the interaction between any two chemicals. Therefore, different models can assess different aspects. Further research should consider the collaborative use and interpretation of appropriate models to fully reveal their strengths and limitations in order to achieve functional complementarity.
Sixth, as previously discussed, although limited studies on air pollution and DED have been published, since our study was the first research conducted in Urumqi, there was a lack of validation based on this region. Furthermore, large-scale and long-term multi-center studies are still needed to analyze in detail the association in different populations in the wider region.

5. Conclusions

We conducted the first large sample size time series analysis in northwest China (Xinjiang), covering 9970 DED patients in Urumqi from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020, and analyzed in detail the association of six major air pollutants with DED outpatient visits, as well as single-day lag and cumulative lag effects in Urumqi by constructing single-pollutant and multi-pollutant models. Our study confirmed, for the first time, the effect of air pollution, including PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NO2, on the risk of DED in Urumqi, and suggested the potential lag effect of PM2.5, SO2, and NO2, which provided new evidence for research in this area. The results of the subgroup analysis suggested that the effects of air pollution on DED were influenced by gender, age, and cold/warm seasons. Considering the impact of particulate pollutants and acid gasses (SO2, NO2) in this rapidly growing economic and industrial region, it highlights the persistence of further implementation of local pollution control measures, related to the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal, as well as the need for special population protection policies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/atmos14010090/s1. Supplementary Materials A: Figure S1 shows the dose concentration distribution over time for meteorological conditions in Urumqi, Xinjiang. Supplementary Materials A: Figures S2–S192 show the exposure-response association between dry eye disease outpatient visits and six air pollutants exposure, the relative risks (RRs) of per 10 μg/m3 increase on dry eye disease outpatient visits at various lag days, 3D graph and contour map of their exposure on dry eye disease outpatient visits. Supplementary Material B shows the location of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Urumqi, Xinjiang, China) and the location of 11 monitoring stations.

Author Contributions

Methodology, K.L., S.-Y.G., J.-C.Q. and X.-C.W.; Software, S.-Y.G.; Validation, S.-Y.G.; Resources, X.-L.Y. and Z.-X.J.; Data curation, K.L., F.-B.T., X.-L.Y. and Z.-X.J.; Writing—original draft, J.-C.Q., X.-C.W. and F.Y.; Writing—review and editing, K.L. and J.-C.Q.; Visualization, K.L. and S.-Y.G.; Supervision, K.L. and F.-B.T.; Project administration, F.-B.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Key Projects of Natural Science Research of Anhui Provincial Department of Education (KJ2020A0163) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070986, 82171043).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University approved and supervised the whole process of the study, and the process was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (No. K202205-08).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Access to any dataset used can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ophthalmology Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University and the Ophthalmology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University for their collaborative and logistical work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Tian, Y.; Xiang, X.; Wu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Song, J.; Sun, K.; Liu, H.; Hu, Y. Fine Particulate Air Pollution and First Hospital Admissions for Ischemic Stroke in Beijing, China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zheng, X.Y.; Ding, H.; Jiang, L.N.; Chen, S.W.; Zheng, J.P.; Qiu, M.; Zhou, Y.X.; Chen, Q.; Guan, W.J. Association between Air Pollutants and Asthma Emergency Room Visits and Hospital Admissions in Time Series Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lu, C.W.; Fu, J.; Liu, X.F.; Chen, W.W.; Hao, J.L.; Li, X.L.; Pant, O.P. Air pollution and meteorological conditions significantly contribute to the worsening of allergic conjunctivitis: A regional 20-city, 5-year study in Northeast China. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mimura, T.; Ichinose, T.; Yamagami, S.; Fujishima, H.; Kamei, Y.; Goto, M.; Takada, S.; Matsubara, M. Airborne particulate matter (PM2.5) and the prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis in Japan. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 487, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hong, J.; Zhong, T.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Ye, X.; Mu, Z.; Lu, Y.; Mashaghi, A.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, M.; et al. Ambient air pollution, weather changes, and outpatient visits for allergic conjunctivitis: A retrospective registry study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Al-Saedi, Z.; Zimmerman, A.; Bachu, R.D.; Dey, S.; Shah, Z.; Baugh, R.; Boddu, S.H. Dry Eye Disease: Present Challenges in the Management and Future Trends. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 4470–4490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Um, S.B.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, H.K.; Song, J.S.; Kim, H.C. Spatial epidemiology of dry eye disease: Findings from South Korea. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2014, 13, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Albdaya, N.A.; Binyousef, F.H.; Alrashid, M.H.; Alajlan, A.A.; Alsharif, F.A.; Alfouzan, S.K.; Alhuthail, R.R. Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease and Its Association With the Frequent Usage of Eye Cosmetics Among Women. Cureus 2022, 14, e27142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuang, T.M.; Tsai, S.Y.; Liu, C.J.; Lee, S.M.; Chou, P. Association between dry eye and depressive symptoms in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: The Shihpai Eye Study. Eye 2021, 35, 2826–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caffery, B.E.; Richter, D.; Simpson, T.; Fonn, D.; Doughty, M.; Gordon, K. CANDEES. The Canadian Dry Eye Epidemiology Study. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1998, 438, 805–806. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, N.N.; Liu, L.; Li, J.; Sun, Y.Z. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye symptom in mainland china: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 2014, 748654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, D.; Deng, Q.; Wang, J.; Chang, X.; Wang, S.; Yang, R.; Yu, J.; Yu, J. Air Pollutants are associated with Dry Eye Disease in Urban Ophthalmic Outpatients: A Prevalence Study in China. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ehret, M.; Sauer, A.; Speeg-Schatz, C.; Bourcier, T. Ocular surface and outdoor air pollution: A systematic review. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 2022, 45, 784–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Deng, L.; Huang, X. Prevalence of dry eye disease in the elderly: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020, 99, e22234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Najafi, L.; Malek, M.; Valojerdi, A.E.; Aghili, R.; Khamseh, M.E.; Fallah, A.E.; Tokhmehchi, M.R.; Behrouz, M.J. Dry eye and its correlation to diabetes microvascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2013, 27, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Qian, L.; Wei, W. Identified risk factors for dry eye syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhong, J.Y.; Lee, Y.C.; Hsieh, C.J.; Tseng, C.C.; Yiin, L.M. Association between Dry Eye Disease, Air Pollution and Weather Changes in Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mo, Z.; Fu, Q.; Lyu, D.; Zhang, L.; Qin, Z.; Tang, Q.; Yin, H.; Xu, P.; Wu, L.; Wang, X.; et al. Impacts of air pollution on dry eye disease among residents in Hangzhou, China: A case-crossover study. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 246, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. An, Y.; Kim, H. Sleep disorders, mental health, and dry eye disease in South Korea. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mu, J.; Zeng, D.; Fan, J.; Liu, M.; Yu, S.; Ding, W.; Zhang, S. Associations Between Air Pollution Exposure and Daily Pediatric Outpatient Visits for Dry Eye Disease: A Time-Series Study in Shenzhen, China. Int. J. Public Health 2021, 66, 1604235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hwang, S.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Paik, H.J.; Wee, W.R.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, D.H. Potential Importance of Ozone in the Association Between Outdoor Air Pollution and Dry Eye Disease in South Korea. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bao, N.; Lu, Y.; Huang, K.; Gao, X.; Gui, S.Y.; Hu, C.Y.; Jiang, Z.X. Association between short-term exposure to ambient nitrogen dioxide and the risk of conjunctivitis in Hefei, China: A time-series analysis. Environ. Res. 2021, 195, 110807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, R.; Yang, J.; Chen, D.; Liu, W.J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, H.; Li, B.; Xiong, P.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; et al. Air pollution and hospital outpatient visits for conjunctivitis: A time-series analysis in Tai’an, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 15453–15461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cheng, P.; Liu, C.; Tu, B.; Zhang, X.; Chen, F.; Xu, J.; Qian, D.; Wang, X.; Zhou, W. Short-Term effects of ambient ozone on the risk of conjunctivitis outpatient visits: A time-series analysis in Pudong New Area, Shanghai. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2022, 27, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goshua, A.; Akdis, C.A.; Nadeau, K.C. World Health Organization global air quality guideline recommendations: Executive summary. Allergy 2022, 77, 1955–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kim, Y.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, M.K.; Paik, H.J.; Kim, D.H. Different adverse effects of air pollutants on dry eye disease: Ozone, PM2.5, and PM10. Environ. Pollut 2020, 265, 115039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mandell, J.T.; Idarraga, M.; Kumar, N.; Galor, A. Impact of Air Pollution and Weather on Dry Eye. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yin, P.; Brauer, M.; Cohen, A.J.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Burnett, R.T.; Stanaway, J.D.; Causey, K.; Larson, S.; Godwin, W.; et al. The effect of air pollution on deaths, disease burden, and life expectancy across China and its provinces, 1990–2017: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Planet Health 2020, 4, e386–e398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rupakheti, D.; Yin, X.; Rupakheti, M.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P.; Rai, M.; Kang, S. Spatio-temporal characteristics of air pollutants over Xinjiang, northwestern China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yin, P.; He, G.; Fan, M.; Chiu, K.Y.; Fan, M.; Liu, C.; Xue, A.; Liu, T.; Pan, Y.; Mu, Q.; et al. Particulate air pollution and mortality in 38 of China’s largest cities: Time series analysis. BMJ 2017, 356, j667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Jiskani, I.M.; Ding, X.; Luo, H. Dust pollution in cold region Surface Mines and its prevention and control. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moryani, H.T.; Kong, S.; Du, J.; Bao, J. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals Accumulated on PM2.5 Fractioned Road Dust from Two Cities of Pakistan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kashiwagi, K.; Iizuka, Y. Effect and underlying mechanisms of airborne particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) on cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiang, P.; Liu, R.Y.; Sun, H.J.; Han, Y.H.; He, R.W.; Cui, X.Y.; Ma, L.Q. Molecular mechanisms of dust-induced toxicity in human corneal epithelial cells: Water and organic extract of office and house dust. Environ. Int. 2016, 92, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hao, R.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, L.; Liu, Y.; Sun, M.; Dong, J.; Xu, Y.; Wu, F.; Wei, J.; Xin, X.; et al. Impact of Air Pollution on the Ocular Surface and Tear Cytokine Levels: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 909330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Song, W.; Chang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, K.; Gong, Y.; He, G.; Wang, X.; Christie, P.; Zheng, M.; Dore, A.J.; et al. A multiyear assessment of air quality benefits from China’s emerging shale gas revolution: Urumqi as a case study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 2066–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Mu, J.; Zeng, D.; Zeng, H. Effects of nitrogen dioxide exposure on the risk of eye and adnexa diseases among children in Shenzhen, China: An assessment using the generalized additive modeling approach. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2022, 32, 840–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ferrero, A.; Alassane, S.; Binquet, C.; Bretillon, L.; Acar, N.; Arnould, L.; Muselier-Mathieu, A.; Delcourt, C.; Bron, A.M.; Creuzot-Garcher, C. Dry eye disease in the elderly in a French population-based study (the Montrachet study: Maculopathy, Optic Nerve, nuTRition, neurovAsCular and HEarT diseases): Prevalence and associated factors. Ocul. Surf. 2018, 16, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Clayton, J.A.; Davis, A.F. Sex/gender disparities and women’s eye health. Curr. Eye Res. 2015, 40, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Korpole, N.R.; Kurada, P.; Korpole, M.R. Gender Difference in Ocular Diseases, Risk Factors and Management with Specific Reference to Role of Sex Steroid Hormones. J. Midlife Health 2022, 13, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ezzati, M.; Saleh, H.; Kammen, D.M. The contributions of emissions and spatial microenvironments to exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion in Kenya. Environ. Health Perspect 2000, 108, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Man, R.E.K.; Veerappan, A.R.; Tan, S.P.; Fenwick, E.K.; Sabanayagam, C.; Chua, J.; Leong, Y.Y.; Wong, T.Y.; Lamoureux, E.L.; Cheng, C.Y.; et al. Incidence and risk factors of symptomatic dry eye disease in Asian Malays from the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 742–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bakkar, M.M.; Shihadeh, W.A.; Haddad, M.F.; Khader, Y.S. Epidemiology of symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in Jordan: A cross-sectional non-clinical population-based study. Cont. Lens. Anterior. Eye 2016, 39, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pope, C.A., 3rd; Burnett, R.T.; Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Shi, Y.; Calle, E.E.; Thun, M.J. Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure-response relationship. Circulation 2009, 120, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Leonardi, A.; Lanier, B. Urban eye allergy syndrome: A new clinical entity? Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2008, 24, 2295–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wei, Y.; Asbell, P.A. The core mechanism of dry eye disease is inflammation. Eye Contact Lens. 2014, 40, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Li, J.; Tan, G.; Ding, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, A.; Yang, Q.; Ye, L.; Shao, Y. A mouse dry eye model induced by topical administration of the air pollutant particulate matter 10. Biomed Pharm. 2017, 96, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Malerbi, F.K.; Martins, L.C.; Saldiva, P.H.; Braga, A.L. Ambient levels of air pollution induce clinical worsening of blepharitis. Environ. Res. 2012, 112, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Torricelli, A.A.; Novaes, P.; Matsuda, M.; Braga, A.; Saldiva, P.H.; Alves, M.R.; Monteiro, M.L. Correlation between signs and symptoms of ocular surface dysfunction and tear osmolarity with ambient levels of air pollution in a large metropolitan area. Cornea 2013, 32, e11–e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wolkoff, P. Ocular discomfort by environmental and personal risk factors altering the precorneal tear film. Toxicol. Lett. 2010, 199, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, H.; Kim, E.K.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, T.I. Effects of Exposure to Ozone on the Ocular Surface in an Experimental Model of Allergic Conjunctivitis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Torricelli, A.A.; Matsuda, M.; Novaes, P.; Braga, A.L.; Saldiva, P.H.; Alves, M.R.; Monteiro, M.L. Effects of ambient levels of traffic-derived air pollution on the ocular surface: Analysis of symptoms, conjunctival goblet cell count and mucin 5AC gene expression. Environ. Res. 2014, 131, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tan, G.; Li, J.; Yang, Q.; Wu, A.; Qu, D.Y.; Wang, Y.; Ye, L.; Bao, J.; Shao, Y. Air pollutant particulate matter 2.5 induces dry eye syndrome in mice. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zhang, Y.; Dong, T.; Hu, W.; Wang, X.; Xu, B.; Lin, Z.; Hofer, T.; Stefanoff, P.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Association between exposure to a mixture of phenols, pesticides, and phthalates and obesity: Comparison of three statistical models. Environ. Int. 2019, 123, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location of environmental monitoring stations and hospital in Urumqi, Xinjiang. The location of each air quality monitor is marked with a pink dot; the location of the hospital is marked with a red cross; the home address of each recruited patient is marked with a green dot.
Figure 1. Location of environmental monitoring stations and hospital in Urumqi, Xinjiang. The location of each air quality monitor is marked with a pink dot; the location of the hospital is marked with a red cross; the home address of each recruited patient is marked with a green dot.
Atmosphere 14 00090 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of exposure to NO2 (a), PM2.5 (b), PM10 (c), SO2 (d), O3 (e), CO (f), and outpatient visits for dry eye disease (DED) (g) over time in Urumqi, Xinjiang, 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020. Different colors represent different types of air pollutants/number of DED outpatient visits, gray (NO2), bright yellow (PM2.5), brown (PM10), rufous (SO2), purple (O3), blue (CO) and red (DED outpatient visits).
Figure 2. Distribution of exposure to NO2 (a), PM2.5 (b), PM10 (c), SO2 (d), O3 (e), CO (f), and outpatient visits for dry eye disease (DED) (g) over time in Urumqi, Xinjiang, 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020. Different colors represent different types of air pollutants/number of DED outpatient visits, gray (NO2), bright yellow (PM2.5), brown (PM10), rufous (SO2), purple (O3), blue (CO) and red (DED outpatient visits).
Atmosphere 14 00090 g002
Figure 3. Spearman correlation between different air pollutants and meteorological factors. T: Mean temperature; RH: Relative humidity; AP: Atmospheric pressure; WS: Wind speed; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Spearman correlation between different air pollutants and meteorological factors. T: Mean temperature; RH: Relative humidity; AP: Atmospheric pressure; WS: Wind speed; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Atmosphere 14 00090 g003
Figure 4. Overall exposure-response association for outpatient visits for DED and air pollutants: PM2.5 (a), PM10 (b), CO (c), NO2 (d), SO2 (e), O3 (f) in single-pollutant model.
Figure 4. Overall exposure-response association for outpatient visits for DED and air pollutants: PM2.5 (a), PM10 (b), CO (c), NO2 (d), SO2 (e), O3 (f) in single-pollutant model.
Atmosphere 14 00090 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of outpatients for dry eye disease (DED) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020).
Table 1. Characteristics of outpatients for dry eye disease (DED) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020).
VariablesNumber of MeasurementsMean ± SDMinP25MedianP75Max
Air pollutant concentration
PM2.5 (μg/m3)292164.5 ± 61.96233984397
PM10 (μg/m3)2921120.2 ± 90.81062981531766
SO2 (μg/m3)292116 ± 15.2281017177
NO2 (μg/m3)292148.5 ± 217334460141
CO (mg/m3)29211.2 ± 10.010.60.91.56
O3 (μg/m3)292168.2 ± 37.72356799182
Meteorological factors
Mean temperature (°C)29218.4 ± 13.7−26−4.510.720.635.1
Relative humidity (%)292155.5 ± 21.36375474100
Wind speed (m/s)29212 ± 1.101.41.92.414.8
Atmospheric pressure (hpa)2921912.7 ± 7.8842908913918934
Number of dry eye disease outpatient visits (n)
Total99703.4 ± 3.6012524
Gender
Male27291 ± 1.300019
Female72412.5 ± 2.7002420
Age (years)
0–5680 ± 0.200002
6–182110 ± 0.300003
19–6477902.7 ± 2.8002420
≥6519010.7 ± 1.1000116
Season
Warm (April to September)50693.5 ± 3.7012524
Cold (October to March)49013.4 ± 3.4012521
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum, P25, 25th percentile; P75, 75th percentile; Max, maximum. PM10, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 10 mm; PM2.5, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 2.5 mm; SO2, sulfur dioxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; CO, carbon monoxide; O3, ozone. Mean temperature represents the daily mean air temperature. Please refer to the figure/table before presenting the data/writeup.
Table 2. The relative risks (RRs) of per 10 units increase in air pollutants on DED outpatient visits at various lag days: Single-pollutant model.
Table 2. The relative risks (RRs) of per 10 units increase in air pollutants on DED outpatient visits at various lag days: Single-pollutant model.
Lag EffectsPM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)CO (mg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)O3 (μg/m3)
Single lag effects RRs (95% CI)
Lag 01.02 (0.99–1.04)1.01 (1.00–1.02) *1.08 (0.93–1.25)1.09 (1.01–1.18) *1.08 (1.04–1.13) **1.00 (0.96–1.04)
Lag 11.01 (0.98–1.04)1.00 (0.99–1.01)1.04 (0.89–1.22)1.00 (0.92–1.08)0.99 (0.95–1.03)0.99 (0.96–1.03)
Lag 21.00 (0.98–1.02)1.00 (0.99–1.00)0.96 (0.86–1.08)1.01 (0.95–1.06)0.99 (0.97–1.02)1.00 (0.97–1.02)
Lag 31.01 (0.99–1.02)1.00 (0.99–1.00)0.99 (0.92–1.06)0.99 (0.95–1.02)1.00 (0.98–1.02)1.00 (0.98–1.02)
Lag 41.01 (1.00–1.02)1.00 (1.00–1.01)1.03 (0.95–1.1)0.97 (0.94–1.01)1.00 (0.98–1.02)1.00 (0.98–1.02)
Lag 51.01 (1.00–1.02)1.00 (0.99–1.01)1.03 (0.96–1.10)0.97 (0.94–1.00)1.00 (0.99–1.02)1.00 (0.98–1.02)
Lag 61.01 (1.00–1.02)1.00 (0.99–1.00)1.00 (0.96–1.05)0.98 (0.95–1.00)1.00 (0.99–1.01)1.00 (0.99–1.01)
Lag 71.00 (0.98–1.02)1.00 (0.99–1.01)0.97 (0.87–1.08)0.99 (0.94–1.05)1.00 (0.97–1.03)1.00 (0.97–1.02)
Cumulative lag effects RRs (95% CI)
Lag 0–11.02 (1.00–1.05)1.01 (1.00–1.02)1.12 (0.96–1.32)1.09 (1.00–1.18)1.07 (1.02–1.11) **0.99 (0.94–1.03)
Lag 0–21.02 (1.00–1.05)1.01 (1.00–1.01)1.08 (0.93–1.26)1.09 (1.01–1.19) *1.06 (1.02–1.11) **0.98 (0.94–1.03)
Lag 0–31.03 (1.00–1.06)1.01 (1.00–1.02)1.07 (0.91–1.26)1.08 (0.99–1.18)1.06 (1.01–1.11) *0.98 (0.93–1.03)
Lag 0–41.04 (1.01–1.07) *1.01 (1.00–1.02)1.10 (0.93–1.3)1.05 (0.96–1.15)1.06 (1.01–1.11) *0.98 (0.93–1.04)
Lag 0–51.05 (1.02–1.09) **1.01 (1.00–1.02)1.13 (0.94–1.35)1.02 (0.92–1.12)1.06 (1.01–1.12) *0.99 (0.93–1.04)
Lag 0–61.06 (1.02–1.09) **1.01 (1.00–1.02)1.13 (0.95–1.35)0.99 (0.90–1.10)1.06 (1.01–1.12) *0.99 (0.93–1.04)
Lag 0–71.06 (1.02–1.10) **1.01 (1.00–1.02)1.10 (0.92–1.30)0.98 (0.89–1.09)1.06 (1.01–1.13) *1.06 (1.01–1.13) *
*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01. PM10, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 10 mm; PM2.5, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 2.5 mm; SO2, sulfur dioxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; CO, carbon monoxide; O3, ozone.
Table 3. Correlation of per 10 units increase in air pollutants and outpatients for DED: Multipollutant model.
Table 3. Correlation of per 10 units increase in air pollutants and outpatients for DED: Multipollutant model.
.PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)CO (mg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)O3 (μg/m3)
Lag effectLag effectLag effectLag effectLag effectLag effect
Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative
Adjusted for PM2.5 1.00
(1.00–1.01)
1.01
(0.99–1.02)
1.03
(0.96–1.10)
1.04
(0.85–1.28)
1.08
(1.03–1.13) **
1.06
(1.01–1.12) *
0.97
(0.94–1.01)
1.05
(0.96–1.15)
1.00
(0.97–1.02)
0.98
(0.94–1.03)
Adjusted for PM101.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.04
(1.00–1.08)
1.02
(0.96–1.10)
1.06
(0.88–1.27)
1.07
(1.02–1.12) **
1.05
(1.00–1.10) *
0.97
(0.94–1.00)
1.05
(0.96–1.15)
0.99
(0.95–1.03)
0.98
(0.94–1.03)
Adjusted for CO1.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.05
(1.01–1.09) **
1.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.09
(1.04–1.15) **
1.08
(1.03–1.14) **
0.97
(0.93–1.00)
1.06
(0.97–1.15)
0.99
(0.96–1.03)
0.98
(0.92–1.03)
Adjusted for NO21.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.04
(1.00–1.08) *
1.00
(1.00–1.01)
1.00
(0.99–1.02)
0.96
(0.87–1.07)
0.95
(0.77–1.15)
0.97
(0.93–1.00)
0.91
(0.81–1.02)
0.99
(0.97–1.02)
0.99
(0.94–1.04)
Adjusted for SO21.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.05
(1.02–1.09) **
1.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.03
(0.96–1.10)
1.09
(0.91–1.31)
1.07
(1.02–1.12)
1.05
(1.00–1.11) *
0.99
(0.95–1.03)
0.98
(0.94–1.03)
Adjusted for O31.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.06
(1.02–1.10) **
1.00
(1.00–1.01)
1.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.03
(0.96–1.11)
1.10
(0.92–1.31)
1.07
(1.02–1.11)
1.08
(1.02–1.15) **
1.07
(0.99–1.16)
1.11
(1.02–1.20)*
Adjusted for the other 5 pollutants1.01
(1.00–1.02)
0.97
(0.94–1.01)
1.00
(1.00–1.01)
1.01
(1.00–1.03)
0.84
(0.70–1.01)
0.84
(0.70–1.01)
1.07
(1.02–1.11) **
1.10
(1.03–1.18) **
0.97
(0.94–1.01)
1.06
(0.96–1.17)
0.99
(0.95–1.03)
0.98
(0.92–1.04)
*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01. PM10, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 10 mm; PM2.5, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 2.5 mm; SO2, sulfur dioxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; CO, carbon monoxide; O3, ozone.
Table 4. Correlation of per 10 units increase in air pollutants and outpatients for DED, and effect modification through stratified by patients’ characteristics.
Table 4. Correlation of per 10 units increase in air pollutants and outpatients for DED, and effect modification through stratified by patients’ characteristics.
CharacteristicsPM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)CO (mg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)O3 (μg/m3)
Lag effectLag effectLag effectLag effectLag effectLag effect
Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative Single Cumulative
Sex
Male1.04
(1.00–1.08)
1.03
(0.97–1.10)
1.01
(1.00–1.02)
1.02
(1.00–1.05)
1.14
(0.91–1.42)
0.93
(0.69–1.24)
1.01
(0.99–1.03)
1.15
(1.05–1.27) **
0.98
(0.93–1.03)
0.96
(0.81–1.13)
0.98
(0.94–1.02)
0.98
(0.92–1.05)
Female1.01
(1.00–1.03)
1.03
(0.98–1.07)
1.00
(1.00–1.01)
1.01
(0.99–1.03)
1.04
(0.96–1.12)
0.83
(0.67–1.02)
1.09
(1.03–1.15) **
1.08
(1.01–1.16) *
0.97
(0.94–1.01)
1.08
(0.97–1.20)
0.99
(0.95–1.03)
0.98
(0.92–1.04)
Age (years)
0–51.09
(1.02–1.17)*
1.17
(0.89–1.56)
1.02
(1.00–1.05)
1.03
(0.92–1.15)
1.77
(0.59–5.34)
0.75
(0.15–3.65)
1.16
(1.04–1.30) **
1.56
(0.95–2.54)
2.08
(1.00–4.33)
2.57
(1.17–5.65) *
0.94
(0.83–1.06)
0.77
(0.52–1.16)
6–180.95
(0.90–1.01)
0.77
(0.63–0.95) *
--0.84
(0.59–1.18)
0.75
(0.26–2.20)
1.29
(1.01–1.64) *
1.50
(1.06–2.13) *
0.83
(0.54–1.28)
0.72
(0.45–1.15)
1.09
(1.02–1.15)**
0.86
(0.70–1.07)
19–641.01
(1.00–1.03) *
1.04
(0.99–1.08)
1.00
(1.00–1.01)
1.01
(0.99–1.03)
0.83
(0.69–0.99) *
0.80
(0.66–0.97)*
1.08
(1.02–1.14) **
1.10
(1.02–1.17) **
0.98
(0.95–1.01)
1.05
(0.95–1.16)
0.99
(0.96–1.02)
0.97
(0.92–1.03)
≥651.04
(1.00–1.07)
1.04
(0.96–1.12)
1.01
(1.00–1.01)
1.02
(0.99–1.05)
1.18
(0.86–1.61)
1.20
(0.79–1.82)
1.06
(0.96–1.17)
1.10
(0.98–1.24)
0.93
(0.87–1.00)
1.14
(0.93–1.38)
0.96
(0.90–1.03)
0.97
(0.89–1.05)
Season
Warm
(April to September)
0.98
(0.95–1.01)
1.03
(0.92–1.15)
1.03
(0.99–1.06)
1.05
(1.00–1.11) *
1.19
(1.01–1.4)*
1.75
(1.01–3.03) *
0.98
(0.94–1.01)
1.03
(0.92–1.15)
0.95
(0.89–1.02)
0.84
(0.62–1.14)
0.98
(0.95–1.02)
1.02
(0.95–1.11)
Cold
(October to March)
1.01
(1.00–1.02) **
1.03
(0.99–1.07)
1.00
(1.00–1.01) *
1.02
(1.00–1.04) *
1.07
(1.02–1.12) ***
0.87
(0.74–1.02)
1.09
(1.02–1.17) *
1.16
(1.07–1.26) **
1.05
(1.01–1.09)
0.91
(0.81–1.01)
0.92
(0.86–0.98) **
0.87
(0.81–0.93)**
*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001. PM10, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 10 mm; PM2.5, fine particulate matter with a median aerometric diameter of less than 2.5 mm; SO2, sulfur dioxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; CO, carbon monoxide; O3, ozone.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, K.; Gui, S.-Y.; Qiao, J.-C.; Wang, X.-C.; Yang, F.; Tao, F.-B.; Yi, X.-L.; Jiang, Z.-X. Association between Air Pollution Exposure and Daily Outpatient Visits for Dry Eye Disease: A Time-Series Study in Urumqi, China. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010090

AMA Style

Liang K, Gui S-Y, Qiao J-C, Wang X-C, Yang F, Tao F-B, Yi X-L, Jiang Z-X. Association between Air Pollution Exposure and Daily Outpatient Visits for Dry Eye Disease: A Time-Series Study in Urumqi, China. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Kun, Si-Yu Gui, Jian-Chao Qiao, Xin-Chen Wang, Fan Yang, Fang-Biao Tao, Xiang-Long Yi, and Zheng-Xuan Jiang. 2023. "Association between Air Pollution Exposure and Daily Outpatient Visits for Dry Eye Disease: A Time-Series Study in Urumqi, China" Atmosphere 14, no. 1: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010090

APA Style

Liang, K., Gui, S. -Y., Qiao, J. -C., Wang, X. -C., Yang, F., Tao, F. -B., Yi, X. -L., & Jiang, Z. -X. (2023). Association between Air Pollution Exposure and Daily Outpatient Visits for Dry Eye Disease: A Time-Series Study in Urumqi, China. Atmosphere, 14(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop