Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Methods
2.1. Accounting for CH4 Emissions in China
2.1.1. Coal Industry
- (1)
- CH4 emissions during underground mining. CBM is continuously released into coal mine tunnels and caverns during underground coal mining and then emitted to the atmosphere through the ventilation and air extraction systems.
- (2)
- CH4 emissions during open-pit mining. CH4 is released from coal mined in open pits and from adjacent exposed coal seams.
- (3)
- CH4 emissions during post-mining activities. Before coal is combusted, CH4 is generated during activities such as coal cleaning, storage, transportation, and crushing.
- (4)
- CH4 emissions from abandoned mines. CMM will be slowly released into a mine and to the atmosphere for a certain period after the mine has been abandoned.
2.1.2. Oil and Gas Industry
2.2. Study Methods
3. Research Results
3.1. Overall CH4 Emissions
3.2. CH4 Emissions by the Coal Industry
3.3. CH4 Emissions by the Oil and Gas Industry
3.4. Comparison of the Different Scenarios
4. Conclusions
4.1. Methane Emissions from China’s Energy Sector Are Likely to Have Stabilised and Can Be Peaking with CO2 Emissions
4.2. Methane Emissions from Energy Sector will Be Reduced in the near Term by Controlling the Level of Production Activity, but in the Long Term it Will Still Require the Deployment of Abatement Technologies to Achieve Deeper Reductions
4.3. Emissions Accounting System for Energy Methane Emissions Still Needs to Be Improved
5. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Emissions Gap Report 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.unep.org/interactive/emissions-gap-report/2020/ (accessed on 1 January 2020).
- IPCC Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. 2018. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/ (accessed on 1 January 2021).
- IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2030. 2012. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/epa_global_nonco2_projections_dec2012.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.K.; Tignor, M.M.; Allen, S.K.; Boschung, J.; Nauels, A.; Xia, Y.; Bex, V.; Midgley, P.M. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Alley, R.B.; Berntsen, T.; Bindoff, N.L.; Chen, Z.; Chidthaisong, A.; Gregory, J.M.; Hegerl, G.C.; et al. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2007, The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Weyant, J.P. EMF-EMF 22, Climate Change Control Scenarios. In Energy Modeling Forum; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- IEA. Methane Tracker 2021, IEA, 2021, Paris. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/methane-tracker-2021 (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Hyman, R.C.; Reilly, J.M.; Babiker, M.H.; De Masin, A.; Jacoby, H.D. Modeling non-CO2 greenhouse gas abatement. Environ. Model. Assess. 2002, 8, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manne, A.S.; Richels, R.G. An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gasses. Nature 2001, 5, 675–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- What Are the Gains from a Multigas Strategy? Available online: https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=350017064003086122074097109082100119065014088087016004031105065000091024062039106127044022037031009085124106064103004047030065085027079098020017068009126007081021018025075116120068118114090026121118084078076069069086092097002029109075089118110&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Greenblatt, J.; Long, J. California’s Energy Future: Portraits of Energy Systems for Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets; California Council on Science and Technology: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Greenblatt, J.B. Estimating Policy-Driven Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trajectories in California: The California Greenhouse Gas Inventory Spreadsheet (GHGIS) Model; Report Number LBNL-6451E; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, USA.
- Yang, C.; Yeh, S.; Ramea, K.; Zakerinia, S.; McCollum, D.; Bunch, D.; Ogden, J. Modeling Optimal Transition Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy in California: California TIMES (CA-TIMES) Model; Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-14-04; Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California: Davis, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, M.; Nelson, J.H.; Ting, M.; Yang, C.; Kammen, D.; Jones, C.; Mileva, A.; Johnston, J.; Bharvirkar, R. California’s Carbon Challenge (CCC): Scenarios for Achieving 80% Emissions Reduction in 2050; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, M.; Nelson, J.H.; Greenblatt, J.B.; Mileva, A.; Johnston, J.; Ting, M.; Yang, C.; Jones, C.; McMahon, J.E.; Kammen, D.M. Deep carbon reductions in California require electrification and integration across economic sectors. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 014038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Resource Institute. Opportunities of Enhance Non-Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in China. 2016. Available online: https://www.wri.org.cn/Opportunities-To-Enhance-Non-Carbon-Dioxide-Greenhouse-Gas-Mitigation-in-China (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Yao, B.; Ross, K.; Zhu, J.; Igusky, K.; Song, R.; Damassa, T. Opportunities to Enhance Non-carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in China. World Resources Institute. 2016. Available online: https://www.wri.org/publication/greenhouse-gas-mitigation-in-china (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Lin, J.; Khanna, N.; Liu, X.; Teng, F.; Wang, X. China’s Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Future Trajectories and Mitigation Options and Potential. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Teng, F.; Su, X.; Wang, X. Can China Peak Its Non-CO2 GHG Emissions before 2030 by Implementing Its Nationally Determined Contribution? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 12168–12176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, R. Opportunities to Advance Mitigation Ambition in China: Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Working Paper; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA; Available online: https://www.wri.org/publication/opportunities-advance-mitigation-ambition (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Wang, X.; Teng, F.; Zhang, J.; Khanna, N.; Lin, J. Challenges to addressing non-CO2 greenhouse gases in China’s long-term climate strategy. Clim. Policy 2017, 18, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Vuuren, D.P.; Eickhout, B.; Lucas, P.L.; Den Elzen, M.G.J. Long-term multi-gas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing: Exploring costs and benefits within an integrated assessment framework. Energy J. 2006, 3, 201–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shindell, D.T.; Faluvegi, G.; Bell, N.; Schmidt, G.A. An emissions-based view of climate forcing by methane and tropospheric ozone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayhoe, K.; Jain, A.; Pitcher, H.; MacCracken, C.; Gibbs, M.; Wuebbles, D.; Harvey, R.; Kruger, D. Costs of multi greenhouse gas reduction targets for the USA. Science 1999, 286, 905–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swart, R.; Amann, M.; Raes, F.; Tuinstra, W. A Good Climate for Clean Air: Linkages between Climate Change and Air Pollution. An Editorial Essay. Clim. Change 2004, 66, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennekamp, M.; Carey, M. Air quality and chronic disease: Why action on climate change is also good for health. New South Wales Public Health Bull. 2010, 21, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Anenberg, S.C.; Schwartz, J.; Shindell, D.; Amann, M.; Faluvegi, G.; Klimont, Z.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; Pozzoli, L.; Van Dingenen, R.; Vignati, E.; et al. Global Air Quality and Health Co-benefits of Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change through Methane and Black Carbon Emission Controls. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014, Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014.
- World Health Organization and Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Reducing Global Health Risks through Mitigation of Short-Lived Climate Pollutants. 2015. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/reducing-climate-pollutants/en/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Ren, C.; Tong, S. Temperature modifies the health effects of particulate matter in Brisbane, Australia. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2006, 51, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, K.R.; Jerrett, M.; Anderson, H.R.; Burnett, R.T.; Stone, V.; Derwent, R.; Atkinson, R.W.; Cohen, A.; Shonkoff, S.B.; Krewski, D.; et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants. Lancet 2009, 374, 2091–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sitch, S.; Cox, P.M.; Collins, W.J.; Huntingford, C. Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. Nature 2007, 448, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munnings, C.; Krupnick, A. Comparing Policies to Reduce Methane Emissions in the Natural Gas Sector. 2017. Available online: http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-Rpt-Methane.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Natural Gas STAR Program. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/natural-gas-star-program/natural-gas-star-program (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Global Methane Initiative. European Commission Global Methane Reduction Actions. Available online: https://www.globalmethane.org/documents/EC_GMI_reduction_actions.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- The CCAC Oil & Gas Methane Partnership. Available online: http://www.ccacoalition.org/en/activity/ccac-oil-gas-methane-partnership (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- White House. Fact Sheet: Administration Takes Steps Forward on Climate Action Plan by Announcing Actions to Cut Methane Emissions; Office of the Press Secretary: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- European Union. 2020 Climate & Energy Package. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2020_en (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- OIL AND GAS, As House Moves to Kill Methane Regs, Colo. Asks Why. Available online: https://www.eenews.net/climatewire/2017/01/30/stories/1060049171 (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Sheng, J.; Song, S.; Zhang, Y.; Prinn, R.G.; Janssens-Maenhout, G. Bottom-Up estimates of coal mine methane emissions in China: A gridded inventory, emission factors, and trends. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Guan, C.; Zhang, B.; Li, K. Decreasing methane emissions from China’s coal mining with rebounded coal production. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 124037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X. China’s Long-term Low-carbon Development Strategies and Pathways; Springer: Berlin, Germany; China Environment Publishing Group: Beijing, China, 2021; Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-16-2524-4#toc (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- National Development and Reform Commission. The First Biennial Update Report of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: http://qhs.ndrc.gov.cn/dtjj/201701/W020170123346264208002.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data Explorer. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/#energy/coalmining/allgas/subcategory/current (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- The People’s Republic of China First Biennial Update Report on Climate Change. 2016. Available online: https://www.ccchina.org.cn/archiver/ccchinacn/UpFile/Files/Default/20170124155928346053.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- China’s Achievements, New Goals and New Measures for Nationally Determined Contributions and China’s Mid-Century Long-Term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategy. 2021. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/cover%20letter.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
Activity | Equation | Activity Level | Emission Factor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Coal industry | Underground mining | Amount of coal mined × emission factor per unit of coal mined | Amount of coal mined | 10.59 m3/t |
Post-mining activities | Raw coal output of underground coal mines × emission factor | Post-mining activities should be arranged based on the raw coal outputs of outburst mines, high gas mines, and gas mines nationwide. |
| |
Oil and gas industry | Oil and gas exploitation-related steps: extraction, processing, and transmission | Facility/equipment × emission factor for the facility/equipment unit | For example, the numbers of well-head assemblies, compressor stations, transmission pipelines, and refineries | Mean emission factor based on output or a factor for a specific emission source |
Scenario | Assumptions | |
---|---|---|
Activity | Emission Factor | |
BAU | Keep the current development, coal production keeps increasing by 3.9 billion tons in 2020 and then decreases by 2.9 billion tons by 2050. The annual decrease rate for the period from 2020–2030 will be −1%, and double from 2030–2050. | keep current methane recovery and utilization level of annual 20 billion cubic meters |
Oil and gas consumption will peak by 2035, holding at 1.6 billion tce, oil consumption will peak earlier than gas consumption. | Freeze, keep the current national inventory factors | |
NDC scenario | Coal production keeps increasing by 3.9 billion tons in 2020 and then decreases by 1.5 billion tons by 2050. The annual decrease rate for the period from 2020–2030 will be −3% and remain 4% from 2030–2050. | encourage the recovery and utilization of low concentration methane after 2020, increase the utilized rate by more than 60% |
Oil and gas consumption will peak about 2030, holding at 1.5 billion tce. | lag five years compared with the same period in US | |
Extreme scenario | Coal production keeps increasing by 3.9 billion tons in 2020 and then decreases by 0.7 billion tons by 2050. The annual decrease rate for the period from 2020–2030 will be −8%, and −5% from 2030–2050. | encourage the recovery and utilization of low concentration methane after 2020, increase the utilized rate by more than 65% |
Oil and gas consumption will peak about 2025, holding at 1.4 billion tce. | lag three years compared with the same period in US |
Year | 2020 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
Activity | |||||||
Coal production (Billion tons) | |||||||
BAU | 3.90 | 3.90 | 3.90 | 3.73 | 3.30 | 3.10 | 2.90 |
NDC | 3.90 | 3.53 | 3.00 | 2.71 | 2.05 | 1.76 | 1.46 |
Extreme Scenario | 3.90 | 2.80 | 1.86 | 1.27 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.66 |
Oil production (Million tons) | |||||||
BAU/NDC/Extreme Scenario | 195 | 195 | 200 | 199 | 197 | 189 | 180 |
Gas Production (Billion cubic meters) | |||||||
BAU/NDC/Extreme Scenario | 192 | 203 | 247 | 300 | 328 | 345 | 350 |
Main Emission Factor | |||||||
Coal mining emission factors (m3/ton) | |||||||
BAU | 10.59 | 10.59 | 10.59 | 10.59 | 10.59 | 10.59 | 10.59 |
NDC | 10.59 | 10.36 | 10.13 | 9.67 | 9.21 | 8.98 | 8.75 |
Extreme Scenario | 10.59 | 10.2 | 9.78 | 9.2 | 8.505 | 8.16 | 7.81 |
Oil exploration emission factors (t CH4/million tons) | |||||||
BAU | 586 | 746 | 781 | 942 | 795 | 648 | 600 |
NDC | 586 | 746 | 781 | 942 | 795 | 648 | 600 |
Extreme Scenario | 586 | 580 | 483 | 386 | 149 | 25 | 25 |
Oil production emission factor (t CH4/million tons) | |||||||
BAU | 4063 | 4106 | 4097 | 3900 | 3821 | 3708 | 3593 |
NDC | 4063 | 4097 | 4137 | 3821 | 3708 | 3593 | 3095 |
Extreme Scenario | 4063 | 3821 | 3295 | 2768 | 2579 | 2550 | 2550 |
Oil transportation (t CH4/million tons) | |||||||
BAU/NDC | 16.6 | 16.5 | 16.8 | 16.7 | 15.3 | 15.0 | 15.2 |
Extreme Scenario | 16.6 | 15.3 | 15.2 | 15.7 | 14.8 | 13.4 | 13.4 |
Gas production emission factors (t CH4/Billion cubic meters) | |||||||
BAU | 7311 | 7520 | 7420 | 7513 | 7342 | 7177 | 6860 |
NDC | 7311 | 7420 | 7513 | 7342 | 7177 | 6860 | 6647 |
Extreme Scenario | 7311 | 7342 | 6860 | 6156 | 5880 | 5904 | 5904 |
Gas transportation and storage (t CH4/Billion cubic meters) | |||||||
BAU | 1900 | 1900 | 1900 | 1900 | 1900 | 1900 | 1900 |
NDC | 1900 | 1900 | 1801 | 1801 | 1801 | 1801 | 1801 |
Extreme Scenario | 1900 | 1900 | 1838 | 1848 | 1763 | 1763 | 1763 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gu, A.; Zhou, S.; Xu, S.; Tong, Q. Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989
Gu A, Zhou S, Xu S, Tong Q. Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(12):1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989
Chicago/Turabian StyleGu, Alun, Sheng Zhou, Shuangqing Xu, and Qing Tong. 2022. "Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050" Atmosphere 13, no. 12: 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989
APA StyleGu, A., Zhou, S., Xu, S., & Tong, Q. (2022). Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050. Atmosphere, 13(12), 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989