Next Article in Journal
7Be, 210Pbatm and 137Cs in Snow Deposits in the Arctic Part of Western Siberia (Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District)
Next Article in Special Issue
Resolution Dependence of Turbulent Structures in Convective Boundary Layer Simulations
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction Skill of Extended Range 2-m Maximum Air Temperature Probabilistic Forecasts Using Machine Learning Post-Processing Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Wind Shear in the Decay of Convective Boundary Layers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reconciling Chord Length Distributions and Area Distributions for Fields of Fractal Cumulus Clouds

1
Department of Physics, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, Penn State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.
Atmosphere 2020, 11(8), 824; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080824
Submission received: 27 May 2020 / Revised: 29 July 2020 / Accepted: 30 July 2020 / Published: 5 August 2020

Abstract

While the total cover of broken cloud fields can in principle be obtained from one-dimensional measurements, the cloud size distribution normally differs between two-dimensional (area) and one-dimensional retrieval (chord length) methods. In this study, we use output from high-resolution Large Eddy Simulations to generate a transfer function between the two. We retrieve chord lengths and areas for many clouds, and plot the one as a function of the other, and vice versa. We find that the cloud area distribution conditional on the chord length behaves like a gamma distribution with well-behaved parameters, with a mean μ=1.1L and a shape parameter β=L0.645. Using this information, we are able to generate a transfer function that can adjust the chord length distribution so that it comes much closer to the cloud area distribution. Our transfer function improves the error in predicting the mean cloud size, and is performs without strong biases for smaller sample sizes. However, we find that the method is still has difficulties in accurately predicting the frequency of occurrence of the largest cloud sizes.
Keywords: cumulus clouds; cloud size distributions; Large Eddy Simulations; fractals cumulus clouds; cloud size distributions; Large Eddy Simulations; fractals

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barron, N.R.; Ryan, S.D.; Heus, T. Reconciling Chord Length Distributions and Area Distributions for Fields of Fractal Cumulus Clouds. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080824

AMA Style

Barron NR, Ryan SD, Heus T. Reconciling Chord Length Distributions and Area Distributions for Fields of Fractal Cumulus Clouds. Atmosphere. 2020; 11(8):824. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080824

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barron, Nicholas R., Shawn D. Ryan, and Thijs Heus. 2020. "Reconciling Chord Length Distributions and Area Distributions for Fields of Fractal Cumulus Clouds" Atmosphere 11, no. 8: 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080824

APA Style

Barron, N. R., Ryan, S. D., & Heus, T. (2020). Reconciling Chord Length Distributions and Area Distributions for Fields of Fractal Cumulus Clouds. Atmosphere, 11(8), 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080824

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop