Next Article in Journal
Climatic Factors in Relation to Diarrhoea Hospital Admissions in Rural Limpopo, South Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Cloud Processing of Aerosol Particles in Marine Stratocumulus Clouds
Open AccessArticle

A Methodology for Verifying Cloud Forecasts with VIIRS Imagery and Derived Cloud Products—A WRF Case Study

1
Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78759, USA
2
Cloud Systems Research, Austin, TX 78748, USA
3
Institute for Meteorology, Universität Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2019, 10(9), 521; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090521
Received: 7 August 2019 / Revised: 7 August 2019 / Accepted: 3 September 2019 / Published: 5 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cloud Forecasts from NWP and Climate Models)
A methodology is presented to evaluate the accuracy of cloud cover fraction (CCf) forecasts generated by numerical weather prediction (NWP) and climate models. It is demonstrated with a case study consisting of simulations from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. In this study, since the WRF CCf forecasts were initialized with reanalysis fields from the North American Mesoscale (NAM) Forecast System, the characteristics of the NAM CCf products were also evaluated. The procedures relied extensively upon manually-generated, binary cloud masks created from VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imager Radiometry Suite) imagery, which were subsequently converted into CCf truth at the resolution of the NAM and WRF gridded data. The initial results from the case study revealed biases toward under-clouding in the NAM CCf analyses and biases toward over-clouding in the WRF CCf products. These biases were evident in images created from the gridded NWP products when compared to VIIRS imagery and CCf truth data. Thus, additional simulations were completed to help assess the internal procedures used in the WRF model to translate moisture forecast fields into layered CCf products. Two additional sets of WRF CCf 24 h forecasts were generated for the region of interest using WRF restart files. One restart file was updated with CCf truth data and another was not changed. Over-clouded areas in the updated WRF restart file that were reduced with an update of the CCf truth data became over-clouded again in the WRF 24 h forecast, and were nearly identical to those from the unchanged restart file. It was concluded that the conversion of WRF forecast fields into layers of CCf products deserves closer examination in a future study. View Full-Text
Keywords: clouds; VIIRS; WRF; NAM; cloud forecasting; climate modeling clouds; VIIRS; WRF; NAM; cloud forecasting; climate modeling
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hutchison, K.D.; Iisager, B.D.; Dipu, S.; Jiang, X.; Quaas, J.; Markwardt, R. A Methodology for Verifying Cloud Forecasts with VIIRS Imagery and Derived Cloud Products—A WRF Case Study. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 521.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop