Next Article in Journal
MB0 and MBI Are Independent and Distinct Transactivation Domains in MYC that Are Essential for Transformation
Previous Article in Journal
A Genetic Population Isolate in The Netherlands Showing Extensive Haplotype Sharing and Long Regions of Homozygosity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systematic Identification and Assessment of Therapeutic Targets for Breast Cancer Based on Genome-Wide RNA Interference Transcriptomes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 8
Issue 5
10.3390/genes8050135
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Combination of RNA Interference and Stem Cells for Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases

by
Xue-Qin Hou
1,
Lei Wang
1,
Fu-Gang Wang
1,
Xiao-Min Zhao
1 and
Han-Ting Zhang
1,2,*
1
Institute of Pharmacology, Taishan Medical University, Taian 271016, Shandong, China
2
Departments of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry and Physiology & Pharmacology, Blanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2017, 8(5), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8050135
Submission received: 22 February 2017 / Revised: 27 April 2017 / Accepted: 28 April 2017 / Published: 6 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RNA Interference 2016)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
RNA interference (RNAi), including microRNAs, is an important player in the mediation of differentiation and migration of stem cells via target genes. It is used as a potential strategy for gene therapy for central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Stem cells are considered vectors of RNAi due to their capacity to deliver RNAi to other cells. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in studies of RNAi pathways in controlling neuronal differentiation and migration of stem cells. We also highlight the utilization of a combination of RNAi and stem cells in treatment of CNS diseases.

1. Introduction

Central nervous system (CNS) diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and spinal cord injury (SCI) are characterized by neuronal loss in the brain or spinal cord, which cause corresponding impairments in neural functions [1,2,3]. The discovery of stem cells incited expectation for the treatment of these diseases. Stem cells have the ability to renew themselves and differentiate into neurons [4,5] with no immunogenicity [6]. Moreover, stem cells have the capacity of migration towards the sites of injury [7,8,9]. Thus, neuronal loss could be remedied to a certain extent when stem cell therapy is employed, and cell-based therapy is becoming increasingly attractive in the study of CNS diseases. However, stem cells could differentiate into other cell types (such as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes) besides neurons [10]. This disadvantage could limit the application of stem cells in treatment of CNS diseases. Therefore, controlling lineage-specific genes in stem cells has been considered to be a strategy to direct stem cell differentiation. Conventionally, the strategy is regulating the lineage-specific inductive factors [11,12,13,14]. However, the signaling cascades are complex since they include not only inductive factors, but also repressive regulators. Thus, it is possible that controlling the negative genes in stem cells could promote the differentiation of specific lineage commitment [15]. RNA interference (RNAi) is considered an important approach for controlling gene expression [16], as well as for gene therapy [17]. However, the safety and efficiency of RNAi therapy still needs to be considered. The interaction between stem cells and other cells could lead to a more effective delivery of RNAi from stem cells to target tissues [18]. Therefore, the combination of RNAi and stem cells has therapeutic potential for neurological diseases. This brief review focuses on the RNAi pathways in governing the behavior of stem cells by targeting lineage-specific genes. We will also discuss the combination of RNAi and stem cells as a potential therapeutic approach in CNS diseases.

2. Endogenous RNAi Pathways in Governing the Neuronal Differentiation and Migration of Stem Cells

RNAi is a mechanism to inhibit gene expression by double-strand RNA (dsRNA) [19]. Gene-silencing can be mediated by small RNAs, including small interfering RNA (siRNA), short hairpin RNA (shRNA), and microRNA (miRNA) [20,21]. RNAi has been used as a possible therapeutic strategy, and efforts have been made to translate RNAi into clinical applications [20,22,23,24,25]. Additionally, recent studies have identified some miRNAs and their target genes as crucial players in self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells. Therefore, understanding how RNAi pathways are mediated by miRNAs in stem cells may help in discovering more target genes.
Stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and neural stem cells (NSCs), are a potentially promising source for cell-based therapy. MSCs can be easily derived from bone marrow [26], umbilical cord [27], and adipose [28]; they can differentiate into various cells, such as neurons [29], chondrocytes [30], and adipocytes [31]. Bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) were reported to downregulate miR-124, one of the neuron-specific miRNAs abundantly expressed in the brain [32]. On the other hand, upregulation of miR-124 in BMSCs increases expression of neuronal markers, including β-III tubulin, MAP-2, and synaptophysin, and the rate of differentiation of the transplanted BMSCs into neurons in the injured site of spinal cord in rats [33]. Interestingly, miR-124 was regulated by the transcriptional repressor REST (RE1-silencing transcription factor) [34], which could prevent precocious neuronal differentiation and maintain neural stem cells (NSCs) self-renewal in cultured adult NSCs [35]. These studies suggest that the REST-miR-124 pathway may play an important role in mediating neuronal production. Moreover, some of the miR-124 downstream targets have been reported, including Sox 9 [36], PTBP-1 [37], and small C-terminal domain phosphatase 1 (SCP-1) [38]. Sox 9 may determine the glial fate due to its capability of switching neural stem cells from neurogenesis to gliogenesis [39]. Delivery of exogenous miR-124 decreases expression of Sox 9 by targeting its 3′-UTR and increases neuronal differentiation of human neural progenitor cells (NPCs) [40]. In addition, it has been found that Sox 9 controls the induction of nuclear factor-I A (NFIA), which then forms a complex with Sox 9 to co-regulate a set of genes induced following glial initiation [41]. NFIA is also essential for inhibition of neurogenesis and facilitation of glial-fate specification in embryonic spinal cord progenitors [42]. Most recently, it has been found that NFIA is a target of miR-153, inhibition of which in early neurogenic neural stem/progenitor cells induces precocious gliogenesis [43]. In addition, NFIA is also a target of miR-223, which suppresses the proliferation of glial precursors via repression of NFIA in the CNS development [44]; the miR-223/NFIA axis inhibits tumorigenesis in a human glioma cell line. Further, overexpression of miR-223 reduces neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells [45]. PTBP1, also known as PTB or hnRNP I, is considered a repressor of nervous system-specific splicing, and is downregulated by miR-124 during neuronal differentiation [37]. SCP-1, a member of SCPs family, is expressed in non-neuronal tissues. As neurons differentiate, REST/NRSF are reduced (neuron-restrictive silencer factor). While the presence of SCP-1 is not able to disrupt neuronal differentiation of P19 mouse embryonic stem cells, recruitment of SCP-1 by REST/NRSF regulates the neuronal gene silencing in non-neuronal cells [46].
Other miRNAs, such as miR-29a and miR-9, are also involved in enhancing the neural differentiation of BMSCs. Similar to miR-124, miR-29a also regulates neurogenic markers in BMSCs through targeting REST [47]. It is said that miR-29a upregulation results in decreases in REST [47]. Thus, neuronal differentiation is mediated through the miR-29a-REST pathway. MiR-9 promotes the neural differentiation of mouse BMSCs via targeting zinc finger protein 521 [48], which is enriched in most immature cells and reduced with differentiation [49].
There are many other miRNAs that modulate neuronal differentiation in various types of stem cells. miR-125b, one of the brain-enriched miRNAs, has been identified as a player in regulating neuronal differentiation [50,51]. In neural stem/progenitor cells (NS/PCs), miR-125b mediates proliferation, differentiation, and migration, through suppressing Nestin expression [52]. Additionally, miR-125b regulates synapse structure and function via targeting the NMDA receptor subunit NR2A, which is associated with a translational repressor fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) [53]. miR-20 promotes neural progenitor cell differentiation through inactivation of the REST-Wnt pathway [54], while overexpression of miR-128 reduces doublecortin levels in differentiating adult neural progenitors [55].
MiR-506-3p negatively regulates the expression of the transcription factor T-cell factor-3 (TCF3) [56], which was proved to be an integral component of the core regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells [57]. It has been shown that overexpression of miR-506-3p increases NSC proliferation and differentiation via targeting TCF3 [56]. In proliferating NPCs, the level of miR-19 is highly expressed, and decreased upon differentiation. Furthermore, miR-19 regulates cell migration by targeting Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2 (Rapgef2) [58]. Overexpression of miR-7 promotes neural lineage determination and increases synapsin in human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons [59]. Recent studies also have identified some miRNAs that influence neuronal differentiation of human Wharton’s Jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs), including miR-1290, miR-26b, miR-194, miR-124a, miR-4521, and miR-543; while the first four of which were upregulated, the last two were downregulated [60].
It has been demonstrated that different miRNAs could target the same gene and produce synergistic effects. For example, miR-124, -128, and -137 synergistically regulate the overlapping gene Sp1, whose level is decreased as cells differentiate. Silencing Sp1 reduces neuronal differentiation of NSCs and affects their viability and proliferation [61]. Taken together, the mechanism of differentiation and migration of stem cells is complex and involves various miRNAs and their target genes.

3. Combination of RNAi and Stem Cells for Treatment of CNS Diseases

RNAi is considered as an important approach to controlling gene expression [16]. However, one of the problems we confront is the enhancement of the safety and efficiency of RNAi therapy. Recently, combinations of gene therapy and stem cells have been considered to be a promising approach to the treatment of diseases [62]. Stem cells can be utilized as vectors for RNAi delivery as they have been shown to be able to deliver RNAi to other cells [18]. One of the critical barriers for stem cells though is to develop an easy, effective, and safe method to direct cell lineage-specific differentiation [16]. In order to do this, target genes are transfected into stem cells for overexpression. It should be noted that the RNAi signaling pathways play an important role in regulating differentiation, migration, and proliferation of stem cells. Therefore, a combination of RNAi and stem cells are of therapeutic potential for neurologic diseases.

3.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most devastating, age-related neurodegenerative disorders [63]. The amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its product amyloid-β (Aβ) play central roles in AD pathogenesis. Additionally, the accumulation of APP products is associated with β-secretase (BACE1) activity. APP is cleaved by BACE1 and α-secretase to produce APP-C99 and APP-C83, and further produce Aβ and p3, respectively, by γ-secretase [64]. Therefore, reducing the cleavage of APP and the activity of BACE1 has great therapeutic potential for treatment of AD. It has been reported that decreased BACE1 levels using lentiviral vectors expressing BACE1 siRNA reduce Aβ production and AD-like alterations in APP transgenic mice [65]. Xie and co-workers [64] investigated the effects of APP adaptor proteins with phosphotyrosine-binding domains (ShcA, ShcC, and Fe65) expression on APP processing and Aβ production by using RNAi. Their study showed that the silencing of ShcC decreased the levels of APP-C-terminal fragments (APP-CTFs), Aβ, and BACE1 in H4 human neuroglioma cells stably overexpressing full-length APP (H4-FL-APP cells), while silencing of the homolog ShcA had no effect. RNAi silencing of Fe65 increased APP-CTF levels, while it also decreased Aβ levels in H4-FL-APP cells. These studies demonstrate that blocking APP processing, BACE1 activity, or Aβ production may provide therapeutic strategies against AD. Interestingly, the abnormally high levels of BACE1 protein expression appear negatively correlated with the expression of miR-29a/b-1/c cluster in AD [66,67]. Thus, miR-29 could be a potential target for intervention of AD. This is supported by a recent study [68] proving that recombinant pre-miR-29b using polyplexes decreases the BACE1 (around 80%) and Aβ42 (approximately 40–50%) expression levels in N2a695 cells, which is expected to improve the methodologies of miRNA-based therapeutics. In addition, it has been shown that downregulation of miR-98-5p decreases sorting nexin 6-dependent levels of Aβ in vitro, suggesting that miR-98-5p may be a therapeutic target for AD [69].
Neuronal loss is involved in the pathologies of AD and progressively promotes cognitive and memory impairment [1]. An in vitro study using MSCs to treat AD has shown enhancement of autophagy and clearance of amyloid-β (Aβ) in AD models [70]. Interestingly, transplantation of NSCs in APP/PS1 transgenic mice, an animal model of AD, does not alter amyloid pathology, but improves cognition [71]. When NSCs are genetically modified to express neprilysin (sNEP), the Aβ-degrading enzyme, amyloid pathology is reduced and the synaptic density is increased [72]. These results indicate that genetically-modified stem cells may hold great promise for the treatment of AD.
Since neuronal loss is an important feature of AD, one problem is figuring out how to induce neuronal differentiation of stem cells by genetic modification. As stated above, the transcription factor SOX9 is an important regulator in neuronal differentiation of stem cells. Knockdown of SOX9 in stem cells via nanotopography-mediated siRNA induces differentiation of NSCs into neurons more than into glial cells [16], leading to suppression of glial traits. This study demonstrated that SOX9 suppression in stem cells promotes neuronal differentiation. There are many other factors known to play a role in stem cell behaviors. As the principal active ingredient of vitamin A, retinoic acid (RA) exerts biological activities that promote neuronal differentiation of NSCs [73,74]. The RA-encapsulating poly (e-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofiber enhances mRNA expression of neural markers and contributes to MSC phenotypic changes towards the neural lineage [75]. Notably, the neuronal promoting effect of RA was found to be counteracted by the SOX9 protein in NSCs [76]. Therefore, inhibition of SOX9 expression may avoid the negative effect of SOX9 on RA. Recently, traceable PHEMA-RA-PCB-CPP/SPIONs/siSOX9 nanoparticles (ABC/SPIONs/siSOX9 NPs) have been developed for treatment of AD. The complex NPs control siSOX9 delivery, which is faster than RA, leading to downregulation SOX9 protein expression [77]. Therefore, ABC/SPIONs/siSOX9 NPs can efficiently control the differentiation of NSCs into neurons. Moreover, after transplantation of NSCs treated with ABC/SPIONs/siSOX9 NPs, APPswe/PS1dE9 transgenic AD mice display enhanced spatial learning and memory in the Morris water-maze test and increased neurons in the hippocampus as indicated by Nissl staining analysis [77]. The results from these studies suggest that SOX9 RNAi, together with RA, may enhance the neuronal differentiation of stem cells and replace degenerated neurons.

3.2. Huntington’s Disease

Huntington disease (HD) is a hereditary, progressive autosomal-dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by an exon 1 CAG trinucleotide-repeat-expansion mutation in the huntingtin (htt) gene [78,79]. HD is characterized by motor disturbance, cognitive dysfunction, and psychiatric features [80]. The pathological process is associated with neuronal loss [2]. Htt plays a crucial role in neuronal fate. It was reported that NSCs with expanded expression of CAG repeats causes neuronal deaths, while silencing the htt gene decreases neurons and increases astrocytes [81]. shRNA-mediated RNAi of mutant human htt in the animal model of HD improves behavioral and neuropathological abnormalities [82]. Additionally, nonallele-specific silencing of both mutant and wild-type htt via RNAi could improve motor coordination and survival in HD mice [83]. By examining the effects of post-symptomatic RNAi treatment in the HD model mice, it was found that silencing of the htt gene successfully ameliorated the neuropathological abnormalities (insoluble protein accumulation and downregulation of DARPP-32 expression) [84]. However, patients with HD might express both mutant and wild-type htt alleles. It seems necessary to allele-selectively inhibit mutant htt expression. Recently, another study demonstrated that [85] RNAi by single-stranded silencing RNAs (ss-siRNAs) potently (100-fold more than unmodified RNA) and allele-selectively (>30-fold) inhibited mutant htt expression in cells derived from HD patients; it also selectively reduced mutant htt allele throughout the brain in a mouse HD model. In addition, allele-selective silencing was induced by targeting the heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs362331 in exon 50 and total htt silencing by miH12 both in vitro and in vivo [86]. To further clarify the extent of htt mRNA lowering in individual neurons, Keeler AM et al. [87] investigated the effect of miRhtt on htt mRNA levels in striatal neurons of Q140/Q140 knock-in mice, another HD model. They found that intrastriatal infusions of AAV9-GFP-miRhtt vectors reduced htt mRNA in striatum through a partial reduction in mutant htt mRNAs per cell in medium spiny neurons. Recently, miRNAs such as miR-10b-5p, miR-128a, and miR-34b-a have been proven to be associated with HD [88,89,90]. Htt gene expression is regulated by miRNAs and certain heterogeneous miRNA variants are functional and regulate the same target as canonical miRNAs [91]. Taken together, these studies demonstrate the feasibility of treating HD by using RNAi approaches. However, further problems are the poor uptake of RNAi and the transient effects when delivered systemically [92]. Stem cells can help solve these issues because they have been proven to deliver exogenous RNAi materials to other cells. It has been shown that fluorescent-labeled miR-124 and miR-145 mimics are efficiently delivered from MSCs to co-cultured NPCs and astrocytes [40]. To explore a cell-based platform for treating HD, a combination of RNAi and stem cells was employed in a recent investigation. The results showed that MSCs expressing shRNA antisense to htt transferred RNAi to the co-culture U87 cells (previously transduced with mutant htt fragment) and SH-SY5Y cells, leading to decreased levels of mutant htt expressed in the co-culture cells [18].

3.3. Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) impacts a patient’s physical, psychological, and social well-being due to the traumatic event [93]. Approximately 1.7 million individuals worldwide suffer from SCI each year [94], with increases health care and living expenses [95]. It has been suggested that miRNAs regulate gene expression and are associated with the pathogenic processes of SCI, such as inflammation, oxidation, demyelination, and apoptosis [96]. Thus, miRNAs may become potential targets for the therapeutic intervention following SCI. Theis et al. [97] found that transfection of miR-133b into hippocampal neurons stimulated neurite outgrowth in vitro, and injections of lentivirus encoding miR-133b into the lesion site improved locomotor recovery after SCI in mice. Louw et al. [98] developed chitosan/miR-124 polyplex particles and showed that it could inhibit neuronal inflammation after microinjections into injured rat spinal cords.
Currently, standard therapies only have limited effects on secondary neuronal injury [94]. Thus, strategies for treatment and prevention of secondary neuronal damage are necessary. It has been known that neuronal loss is characteristic of SCI and that transplantation of stem cells affects proliferation and differentiation of endogenous stem and progenitor cells [3]. Stem cell-based therapy has been demonstrated to have therapeutic potential in SCI [99]. Given that miRNAs play an important role in the differentiation of stem cells [33], BMSCs were examined for the effect of miR-124 overexpression, which showed that transplantation of miR-124-transfected BMSCs into the injured rat spinal cord increased the number of neuronal cells and substantially improved the motor function of the hind limb of rats with SCI. These findings encourage targeting miRNAs for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of stem cell transplantation for SCI. In addition, the proliferation, differentiation, and migration of stem cells are mediated by various factors and genes, including REST [35], Nogo receptors [100,101], and Leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein (LINGO)-1 [102]. Thus, development of genetically engineered stem cells targeting these genes may enhance the therapeutic efficacy of stem cell-based therapy.
As mentioned previously, some miRNAs are involved in REST signaling pathways and play a negative role in regulating behavior of stem cells. Therefore, silencing of the REST gene increases expression of mesendoderm differentiation markers [103] and enhances neural stem/progenitor cell (NPC) neuronal commitment [15,104]. When the expression of REST is decreased, the transcription of TAC1, a neurotransmitter gene, is induced in human MSCs [105]. Moreover, the induction of TAC1 regulates neuronal differentiation of MSCs, and promotes neural regeneration and functional recovery in a model of SCI in zebrafish after transplantation with neural-induced MSCs [106].
Nogo-66 receptors (NgR) bind to three myelin-associated neurite outgrowth inhibitors (Nogo, myelin-associated glycoprotein, and oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein), causing inhibition of axon regeneration after injury in the adult mammalian CNS [107,108,109]. Deleting one or all of the three inhibitors does not enhance axon regeneration after spinal cord injury [110]. Interestingly, RNAi-mediated silence of the NgR gene in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells before transplantation increases the growth of nerve fibers, improves morphology and behavioral performance, and reduces mortality in rats with spinal cord injury [111]. It has been demonstrated that p75 and LINGO-1 interact with NgR as co-receptors for the three myelin-associated neurite outgrowth inhibitors [112,113]. LINGO-1 is a nervous system-specific transmembrane protein expressed in neurons with high levels in the brain and low levels in the spinal cord, but is not detectable in non-neural tissues [113]. Additionally, recent studies have shown that LINGO-1 is expressed in NSCs, and its neutralization regulates NSCs maturation to neurons [114]. Moreover, inhibition of LINGO-1 via shRNAs increases differentiation of NSCs into neurons [115] and improves functional recovery and nerve regeneration in SCI rats [116]. These results indicate that inhibition of LINGO-1 is a potential treatment approach for SCI. Most recently, it has been shown that transplantation of LINGO-1-RNAi-treated NSCs increases tissue repair and functional recovery in rats subjected to SCI [102].
The high proportion of cell apoptosis is one of the main problems in cell transplantation. P75, a neurotrophin receptor, has been proven to induce apoptosis of neurons [117]. P75-suppressed BMSC decreases the level of apoptosis during neural differentiation in vitro [118]. Furthermore, transplanting p75 siRNA transfected BMSC in SCI rats could promote functional recovery [119]. These studies provide a clear indication that specific genes modified by RNAi can regulate differentiation of stem cells into neurons and increase the survival rate after neural differentiation; genetically modified stem cells can be a source of cells for treatment of SCI.
In addition to neuronal loss, oligodendrocyte cell death and demyelination are also important pathological characteristics of SCI [120]. Oligodendroglial precursor cells (OPCs) are considered the main source for differentiating into mature myelinating oligodendrocytes [121]. Thus, promoting differentiation and remyelination of OPCs could be a target for repair after SCI. TROY, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF), is broadly expressed in postnatal and adult neurons. TROY can replace p75 in the p75/NgR1/LINGO-1 complex to activate RhoA in the presence of myelin inhibitors [122]. Notably, myelin mediates inhibition of OPC differentiation and impairs CNS remyelination [123,124]. It has been shown recently that TROY is expressed in the oligodendrocyte lineage on various differentiation stages, and negatively regulates OPC differentiation and myelination [125]. Transplantation of OPCs treated with TROY-RNAi for 72 h in rats with SCI significantly improves the therapeutic efficacy, resulting in evident morphological and neurological recovery.

4. Conclusions

Based on the findings summarized above, we propose that stem cells can be used as vectors for transferring RNAi-mediated genetic materials and that RNAi-modified stem cells have potential for treating CNS diseases through various pathways after transplantation (Figure 1). There are at least three different pathways involved in these processes. (1) The RNAi-targeted genes are those that inhibit differentiation of stem cells into neurons. Silencing these genes via RNAi triggers intracellular signaling to direct neural differentiation and increase the number of neurons, i.e., neuronal regeneration which compensates neuron loss following neurological disorders; (2) The targeted genes of RNAi are involved in the migration of stem cells toward the injured sites. Combination of the RNAi with stem cells increases residing of stem cells in injured tissues in traumatic diseases such as spinal cord injury and stroke; (3) The RNAi transfers from stem cells to other cells directly or indirectly, where the RNAi subsequently inhibits the expression of targeted genes. The direct way is through cell–cell contact, while the indirect way includes the release of RNAi from the stem cells and the uptake by other cells.
There are multiple pathways affecting the combination of RNAi and stem cells therapies. A better understanding of stem cell biology is needed to help discover different relative genes and develop targeted gene therapies. It has been noted that RNAi can sometimes produce nonspecific, off-target effects, leading to unpredicted phenotypes; this is attributed to miRNA-like binding in the 32 UTRs [20]. For instance, shRNA-mediated doublecortin knockdown produces untoward neuronal migration, which is associated with the disruption of endogenous let7 miRNA or Dicer [126]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop novel, safe, and effective RNAi delivery approaches. Transplantation of RNAi-modified stem cells may represent a promising treatment for neurological disorders in the future.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Foundation of Overseas Distinguished Taishan Scholars of Shandong Province, Collaborative Innovation Center for Research and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Mount Tai, The Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. ZR2013HL062 and ZR2016HB56).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Ager, R.R.; Davis, J.L.; Agazaryan, A.; Benavente, F.; Poon, W.W.; LaFerla, F.M.; Blurton-Jones, M. Human neural stem cells improve cognition and promote synaptic growth in two complementary transgenic models of Alzheimer’s disease and neuronal loss. Hippocampus 2015, 25, 813–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Singh-Bains, M.K.; Tippett, L.J.; Hogg, V.M.; Synek, B.J.; Roxburgh, R.H.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L. Globus pallidus degeneration and clinicopathological features of huntington disease. Ann. Neurol. 2016, 80, 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rossi, S.L.; Nistor, G.; Wyatt, T.; Yin, H.Z.; Poole, A.J.; Weiss, J.H.; Gardener, M.J.; Dijkstra, S.; Fischer, D.F.; Keirstead, H.S. Histological and functional benefit following transplantation of motor neuron progenitors to the injured rat spinal cord. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Klaric, T.S.; Thomas, P.Q.; Dottori, M.; Leong, W.K.; Koblar, S.A.; Lewis, M.D. A reduction in NPAS4 expression results in delayed neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014, 5, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Gutkind, J.S.; Srivatsan, A.; Zhang, G.; Liao, H.S.; Fu, X.; Jin, A.; et al. Polymeric nanovehicle regulated spatiotemporal real-time imaging of the differentiation dynamics of transplanted neural stem cells after traumatic brain injury. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 6683–6695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guha, P.; Morgan, J.W.; Mostoslavsky, G.; Rodrigues, N.P.; Boyd, A.S. Lack of immune response to differentiated cells derived from syngeneic induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yan, S.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Yu, W.; Qin, A.; Liu, M.; Xiang, A.P.; Zhang, W.; Li, W. Nestin regulates neural stem cell migration via controlling the cell contractility. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 78, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Song, M.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, Y.H.; Roh, J.; Kim, E.C.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, S.U.; Yoon, B.W. Long-term effects of magnetically targeted ferumoxide-labeled human neural stem cells in focal cerebral ischemia. Cell Transplant. 2015, 24, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Darsalia, V.; Kallur, T.; Kokaia, Z. Survival, migration and neuronal differentiation of human fetal striatal and cortical neural stem cells grafted in stroke-damaged rat striatum. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Blurton-Jones, M.; Kitazawa, M.; Martinez-Coria, H.; Castello, N.A.; Muller, F.J.; Loring, J.F.; Yamasaki, T.R.; Poon, W.W.; Green, K.N.; LaFerla, F.M. Neural stem cells improve cognition via bdnf in a transgenic model of Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13594–13599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Park, D.; Joo, S.S.; Kim, T.K.; Lee, S.H.; Kang, H.; Lee, H.J.; Lim, I.; Matsuo, A.; Tooyama, I.; Kim, Y.B.; et al. Human neural stem cells overexpressing choline acetyltransferase restore cognitive function of kainic acid-induced learning and memory deficit animals. Cell Transplant. 2012, 21, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, M.F.; Zhang, S.Q.; Gu, R.; Liu, J.B.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Q.S. Transplantation of erythropoietin gene-modified neural stem cells improves the repair of injured spinal cord. Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 1483–1490. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Dong, Y.; Yang, L.; Yang, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, C.; Wu, D. Transplantation of neurotrophin-3-transfected bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for the repair of spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2014, 9, 1520–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Feng, S.Q.; Kong, X.H.; Liu, Y.; Ban, D.X.; Ning, G.Z.; Chen, J.T.; Guo, S.F.; Wang, P. Regeneration of spinal cord with cell and gene therapy. Orthop. Surg. 2009, 1, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Low, W.C.; Yau, W.W.; Stanton, L.W.; Marcy, G.; Goh, E.; Chew, S.Y. Directing neuronal differentiation of primary neural progenitor cells by gene knockdown approach. DNA Cell Biol. 2012, 31, 1148–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Solanki, A.; Shah, S.; Yin, P.T.; Lee, K.B. Nanotopography-mediated reverse uptake for sirna delivery into neural stem cells to enhance neuronal differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Barik, S.; Lu, P. Therapy of respiratory viral infections with intranasal sirnas. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1218, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Olson, S.D.; Kambal, A.; Pollock, K.; Mitchell, G.M.; Stewart, H.; Kalomoiris, S.; Cary, W.; Nacey, C.; Pepper, K.; Nolta, J.A. Examination of mesenchymal stem cell-mediated RNAi transfer to Huntington’s disease affected neuronal cells for reduction of huntingtin. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2012, 49, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Murashov, A.K. A brief introduction to RNAi and micrornas in stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 650, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Deng, Y.; Wang, C.C.; Choy, K.W.; Du, Q.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Li, L.; Chung, T.K.; Tang, T. Therapeutic potentials of gene silencing by rna interference: Principles, challenges, and new strategies. Gene 2014, 538, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sioud, M. Rna interference: Mechanisms, technical challenges, and therapeutic opportunities. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1218, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Zou, G.M. RNAI in stem cells: Current status and future perspectives. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 650, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Schultheis, B.; Strumberg, D.; Santel, A.; Vank, C.; Gebhardt, F.; Keil, O.; Lange, C.; Giese, K.; Kaufmann, J.; Khan, M.; et al. First-in-human phase I study of the liposomal RNA interference therapeutic atu027 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 4141–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Moreno-Montanes, J.; Sadaba, B.; Ruz, V.; Gomez-Guiu, A.; Zarranz, J.; Gonzalez, M.V.; Paneda, C.; Jimenez, A.I. Phase I clinical trial of syl040012, a small interfering RNA targeting beta-adrenergic receptor 2, for lowering intraocular pressure. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2014, 22, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fitzgerald, K.; Frank-Kamenetsky, M.; Shulga-Morskaya, S.; Liebow, A.; Bettencourt, B.R.; Sutherland, J.E.; Hutabarat, R.M.; Clausen, V.A.; Karsten, V.; Cehelsky, J.; et al. Effect of an rna interference drug on the synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and the concentration of serum ldl cholesterol in healthy volunteers: A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial. Lancet 2014, 383, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kakabadze, Z.; Kipshidze, N.; Mardaleishvili, K.; Chutkerashvili, G.; Chelishvili, I.; Harders, A.; Loladze, G.; Shatirishvili, G.; Kipshidze, N.; Chakhunashvili, D.; et al. Phase 1 trial of autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in patients with spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 6768274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, H.; Xie, Z.; Wei, L.; Yang, H.; Yang, S.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, P.; Zhao, C.; Bi, J. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived neuron-like cells rescue memory deficits and reduce amyloid-beta deposition in an abetapp/ps1 transgenic mouse model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013, 4, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Camilleri, E.T.; Gustafson, M.P.; Dudakovic, A.; Riester, S.M.; Garces, C.G.; Paradise, C.R.; Takai, H.; Karperien, M.; Cool, S.; Sampen, H.J.; et al. Identification and validation of multiple cell surface markers of clinical-grade adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells as novel release criteria for good manufacturing practice-compliant production. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cho, S.E.; Kim, Y.M.; Jeong, J.S.; Seo, Y.K. The effect of ultrasound for increasing neural differentiation in HBM-MSCS and inducing neurogenesis in ischemic stroke model. Life Sci. 2016, 165, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dzobo, K.; Turnley, T.; Wishart, A.; Rowe, A.; Kallmeyer, K.; van Vollenstee, F.A.; Thomford, N.E.; Dandara, C.; Chopera, D.; Pepper, M.S.; et al. Fibroblast-derived extracellular matrix induces chondrogenic differentiation in human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wang, Y.L.; Lin, S.P.; Hsieh, P.C.; Hung, S.C. Concomitant beige adipocyte differentiation upon induction of mesenchymal stem cells into brown adipocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 478, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Krichevsky, A.M.; King, K.S.; Donahue, C.P.; Khrapko, K.; Kosik, K.S. A microrna array reveals extensive regulation of micrornas during brain development. RNA 2003, 9, 1274–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zou, D.; Chen, Y.; Han, Y.; Lv, C.; Tu, G. Overexpression of microrna-124 promotes the neuronal differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Neural Regen. Res. 2014, 9, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Gao, Z.; Ding, P.; Hsieh, J. Profiling of rest-dependent micrornas reveals dynamic modes of expression. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gao, Z.; Ure, K.; Ding, P.; Nashaat, M.; Yuan, L.; Ma, J.; Hammer, R.E.; Hsieh, J. The master negative regulator REST/NRSF controls adult neurogenesis by restraining the neurogenic program in quiescent stem cells. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 9772–9786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Laine, S.K.; Alm, J.J.; Virtanen, S.P.; Aro, H.T.; Laitala-Leinonen, T.K. Micrornas mir-96, mir-124, and mir-199a regulate gene expression in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 113, 2687–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Makeyev, E.V.; Zhang, J.; Carrasco, M.A.; Maniatis, T. The microRNA mir-124 promotes neuronal differentiation by triggering brain-specific alternative pre-mrna splicing. Mol. Cell 2007, 27, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Visvanathan, J.; Lee, S.; Lee, B.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, S.K. The microrna mir-124 antagonizes the anti-neural REST/SCP1 pathway during embryonic CNS development. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Stolt, C.C.; Lommes, P.; Sock, E.; Chaboissier, M.C.; Schedl, A.; Wegner, M. The SOX9 transcription factor determines glial fate choice in the developing spinal cord. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1677–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lee, H.K.; Finniss, S.; Cazacu, S.; Xiang, C.; Brodie, C. Mesenchymal stem cells deliver exogenous mirnas to neural cells and induce their differentiation and glutamate transporter expression. Stem Cells Dev. 2014, 23, 2851–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kang, P.; Lee, H.K.; Glasgow, S.M.; Finley, M.; Donti, T.; Gaber, Z.B.; Graham, B.H.; Foster, A.E.; Novitch, B.G.; Gronostajski, R.M.; et al. SOX9 and NFIA coordinate a transcriptional regulatory cascade during the initiation of gliogenesis. Neuron 2012, 74, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Deneen, B.; Ho, R.; Lukaszewicz, A.; Hochstim, C.J.; Gronostajski, R.M.; Anderson, D.J. The transcription factor NFIA controls the onset of gliogenesis in the developing spinal cord. Neuron 2006, 52, 953–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tsuyama, J.; Bunt, J.; Richards, L.J.; Iwanari, H.; Mochizuki, Y.; Hamakubo, T.; Shimazaki, T.; Okano, H. MicroRNA-153 regulates the acquisition of gliogenic competence by neural stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 5, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Glasgow, S.M.; Laug, D.; Brawley, V.S.; Zhang, Z.; Corder, A.; Yin, Z.; Wong, S.T.; Li, X.N.; Foster, A.E.; Ahmed, N.; et al. The mir-223/nuclear factor I-A axis regulates glial precursor proliferation and tumorigenesis in the CNS. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 13560–13568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Harraz, M.M.; Xu, J.C.; Guiberson, N.; Dawson, T.M.; Dawson, V.L. Mir-223 regulates the differentiation of immature neurons. Mol. Cell. Ther. 2014, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yeo, M.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, B.; Ruiz, E.C.; Pfaff, S.L.; Gill, G.N. Small CTD phosphatases function in silencing neuronal gene expression. Science 2005, 307, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Duan, P.; Sun, S.; Li, B.; Huang, C.; Xu, Y.; Han, X.; Xing, Y.; Yan, W. Mir-29a modulates neuronal differentiation through targeting rest in mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Han, R.; Kan, Q.; Sun, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, G.; Peng, T.; Jia, Y. Mir-9 promotes the neural differentiation of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via targeting zinc finger protein 521. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 515, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bond, H.M.; Mesuraca, M.; Amodio, N.; Mega, T.; Agosti, V.; Fanello, D.; Pelaggi, D.; Bullinger, L.; Grieco, M.; Moore, M.A.; et al. Early hematopoietic zinc finger protein-zinc finger protein 521: A candidate regulator of diverse immature cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 40, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Le, M.T.; Xie, H.; Zhou, B.; Chia, P.H.; Rizk, P.; Um, M.; Udolph, G.; Yang, H.; Lim, B.; Lodish, H.F. MicroRNA-125b promotes neuronal differentiation in human cells by repressing multiple targets. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 5290–5305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Boissart, C.; Nissan, X.; Giraud-Triboult, K.; Peschanski, M.; Benchoua, A. Mir-125 potentiates early neural specification of human embryonic stem cells. Development 2012, 139, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cui, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Han, J.; Sun, J.; Ding, W.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, B.; Li, X.; Dai, J. Mir-125b orchestrates cell proliferation, differentiation and migration in neural stem/progenitor cells by targeting nestin. BMC Neurosci. 2012, 13, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Edbauer, D.; Neilson, J.R.; Foster, K.A.; Wang, C.F.; Seeburg, D.P.; Batterton, M.N.; Tada, T.; Dolan, B.M.; Sharp, P.A.; Sheng, M. Regulation of synaptic structure and function by fmrp-associated micrornas mir-125b and mir-132. Neuron 2010, 65, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cui, Y.; Han, J.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, T.; Wang, B.; Chen, B.; Liu, S.; Han, S.; Fang, Y.; Wei, J.; et al. The mir-20-rest-wnt signaling axis regulates neural progenitor cell differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cernilogar, F.M.; Di Giaimo, R.; Rehfeld, F.; Cappello, S.; Lie, D.C. Rna interference machinery-mediated gene regulation in mouse adult neural stem cells. BMC Neurosci. 2015, 16, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, Y.; Chen, J.Q.; Chen, Z.Y.; Chen, H.M. MicroRNA-506-3p regulates neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation through targeting TCF3. Gene 2016, 593, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Cole, M.F.; Johnstone, S.E.; Newman, J.J.; Kagey, M.H.; Young, R.A. TCF3 is an integral component of the core regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 746–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Han, J.; Kim, H.J.; Schafer, S.T.; Paquola, A.; Clemenson, G.D.; Toda, T.; Oh, J.; Pankonin, A.R.; Lee, B.S.; Johnston, S.T.; et al. Functional implications of mir-19 in the migration of newborn neurons in the adult brain. Neuron 2016, 91, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liu, J.; Githinji, J.; McLaughlin, B.; Wilczek, K.; Nolta, J. Role of mirnas in neuronal differentiation from human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2012, 8, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhuang, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, S.; Shu, Q.; Zhang, D.; Xu, G. Altered expression of micrornas in the neuronal differentiation of human wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 600, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Santos, M.C.; Tegge, A.N.; Correa, B.R.; Mahesula, S.; Kohnke, L.Q.; Qiao, M.; Ferreira, M.A.; Kokovay, E.; Penalva, L.O. Mir-124, -128, and -137 orchestrate neural differentiation by acting on overlapping gene sets containing a highly connected transcription factor network. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Myers, T.J.; Granero-Molto, F.; Longobardi, L.; Li, T.; Yan, Y.; Spagnoli, A. Mesenchymal stem cells at the intersection of cell and gene therapy. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2010, 10, 1663–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Marei, H.E.; Althani, A.; Suhonen, J.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Albanna, M.A.; Cenciarelli, C.; Wang, T.; Caceci, T. Common and rare genetic variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 231, 1432–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xie, Z.; Dong, Y.; Maeda, U.; Xia, W.; Tanzi, R.E. RNA interference silencing of the adaptor molecules SHCC and FE65 differentially affect amyloid precursor protein processing and abeta generation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 4318–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Singer, O.; Marr, R.A.; Rockenstein, E.; Crews, L.; Coufal, N.G.; Gage, F.H.; Verma, I.M.; Masliah, E. Targeting bace1 with siRNAs ameliorates Alzheimer disease neuropathology in a transgenic model. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8, 1343–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hebert, S.S.; Horre, K.; Nicolai, L.; Papadopoulou, A.S.; Mandemakers, W.; Silahtaroglu, A.N.; Kauppinen, S.; Delacourte, A.; De Strooper, B. Loss of microrna cluster mir-29a/b-1 in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease correlates with increased bace1/beta-secretase expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6415–6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, G.; Song, Y.; Zhou, X.; Deng, Y.; Liu, T.; Weng, G.; Yu, D.; Pan, S. Microrna-29c targets beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 and has a neuroprotective role in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 3081–3088. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Pereira, P.A.; Tomás, J.F.; Queiroz, J.A.; Figueiras, A.R.; Sousa, F. Recombinant pre-mir-29b for Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Li, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L. Mir-98–5p acts as a target for Alzheimer’s disease by regulating abeta production through modulating SNX6 expression. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2016, 60, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Shin, J.Y.; Park, H.J.; Kim, H.N.; Oh, S.H.; Bae, J.S.; Ha, H.J.; Lee, P.H. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance autophagy and increase beta-amyloid clearance in Alzheimer disease models. Autophagy 2014, 10, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, W.; Wang, P.J.; Sha, H.Y.; Ni, J.; Li, M.H.; Gu, G.J. Neural stem cell transplants improve cognitive function without altering amyloid pathology in an app/ps1 double transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2014, 50, 423–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Blurton-Jones, M.; Spencer, B.; Michael, S.; Castello, N.A.; Agazaryan, A.A.; Davis, J.L.; Muller, F.J.; Loring, J.F.; Masliah, E.; LaFerla, F.M. Neural stem cells genetically-modified to express neprilysin reduce pathology in Alzheimer transgenic models. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014, 5, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Castelo-Branco, G.; Lilja, T.; Wallenborg, K.; Falcao, A.M.; Marques, S.C.; Gracias, A.; Solum, D.; Paap, R.; Walfridsson, J.; Teixeira, A.I.; et al. Neural stem cell differentiation is dictated by distinct actions of nuclear receptor corepressors and histone deacetylases. Stem Cell Rep. 2014, 3, 502–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wu, C.Y.; Persaud, S.D.; Wei, L.N. Retinoic acid induces ubiquitination-resistant rip140/lsd1 complex to fine-tune pax6 gene in neuronal differentiation. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jiang, X.; Cao, H.Q.; Shi, L.Y.; Ng, S.Y.; Stanton, L.W.; Chew, S.Y. Nanofiber topography and sustained biochemical signaling enhance human mesenchymal stem cell neural commitment. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1290–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shah, S.; Solanki, A.; Sasmal, P.K.; Lee, K.B. Single vehicular delivery of sirna and small molecules to control stem cell differentiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15682–15685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhang, R.; Li, Y.; Hu, B.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Traceable nanoparticle delivery of small interfering RNA and retinoic acid with temporally release ability to control neural stem cell differentiation for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6345–6352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Crunkhorn, S. Huntington disease: Boosting ppardelta blocks neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Huntington Study Group; Frank, S.; Testa, C.M.; Stamler, D.; Kayson, E.; Davis, C.; Edmondson, M.C.; Kinel, S.; Leavitt, B.; Oakes, D.; et al. Effect of deutetrabenazine on chorea among patients with huntington disease: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016, 316, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Paulsen, J.S.; Zhao, H.; Stout, J.C.; Brinkman, R.R.; Guttman, M.; Ross, C.A.; Como, P.; Manning, C.; Hayden, M.R.; Shoulson, I.; et al. Clinical markers of early disease in persons near onset of Huntington’s disease. Neurology 2001, 57, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Conforti, P.; Camnasio, S.; Mutti, C.; Valenza, M.; Thompson, M.; Fossale, E.; Zeitlin, S.; MacDonald, M.E.; Zuccato, C.; Cattaneo, E. Lack of huntingtin promotes neural stem cells differentiation into glial cells while neurons expressing huntingtin with expanded polyglutamine tracts undergo cell death. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013, 50, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Harper, S.Q.; Staber, P.D.; He, X.; Eliason, S.L.; Martins, I.H.; Mao, Q.; Yang, L.; Kotin, R.M.; Paulson, H.L.; Davidson, B.L. RNA interference improves motor and neuropathological abnormalities in a Huntington’s disease mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 5820–5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Boudreau, R.L.; McBride, J.L.; Martins, I.; Shen, S.; Xing, Y.; Carter, B.J.; Davidson, B.L. Nonallele-specific silencing of mutant and wild-type huntingtin demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in Huntington’s disease mice. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2009, 17, 1053–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Machida, Y.; Okada, T.; Kurosawa, M.; Oyama, F.; Ozawa, K.; Nukina, N. RAAV-mediated shRNA ameliorated neuropathology in huntington disease model mouse. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 343, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yu, D.; Pendergraff, H.; Liu, J.; Kordasiewicz, H.B.; Cleveland, D.W.; Swayze, E.E.; Lima, W.F.; Crooke, S.T.; Prakash, T.P.; Corey, D.R. Single-stranded RNAs use RNAi to potently and allele-selectively inhibit mutant huntingtin expression. Cell 2012, 150, 895–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Miniarikova, J.; Zanella, I.; Huseinovic, A.; van der Zon, T.; Hanemaaijer, E.; Martier, R.; Koornneef, A.; Southwell, A.L.; Hayden, M.R.; van Deventer, S.J.; et al. Design, characterization, and lead selection of therapeutic miRNAs targeting huntingtin for development of gene therapy for Huntington’s disease. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2016, 5, e297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Keeler, A.M.; Sapp, E.; Chase, K.; Sottosanti, E.; Danielson, E.; Pfister, E.; Stoica, L.; DiFiglia, M.; Aronin, N.; Sena-Esteves, M. Cellular analysis of silencing the Huntington’s disease gene using AAV9 mediated delivery of artificial micro RNA into the striatum of q140/q140 mice. J. Huntingt. Dis. 2016, 5, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Hoss, A.G.; Labadorf, A.; Latourelle, J.C.; Kartha, V.K.; Hadzi, T.C.; Gusella, J.F.; MacDonald, M.E.; Chen, J.F.; Akbarian, S.; Weng, Z.; et al. Mir-10b-5p expression in Huntington’s disease brain relates to age of onset and the extent of striatal involvement. BMC Med. Genom. 2015, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kocerha, J.; Xu, Y.; Prucha, M.S.; Zhao, D.; Chan, A.W. MicroRNA-128a dysregulation in transgenic Huntington’s disease monkeys. Mol. Brain 2014, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Parekh, V. Mir-34b-a novel plasma marker for huntington disease? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011, 7, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kozlowska, E.; Krzyzosiak, W.J.; Koscianska, E. Regulation of huntingtin gene expression by miRNA-137, -214, -148a, and their respective isomirs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 16999–17016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Dykxhoorn, D.M.; Palliser, D.; Lieberman, J. The silent treatment: siRNAs as small molecule drugs. Gene Ther. 2006, 13, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Fehlings, M.; Singh, A.; Tetreault, L.; Kalsi-Ryan, S.; Nouri, A. Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014, 6, 309–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kraft, J.; Karpenko, A.; Rincon, F. Intraoperative targeted temperature management in acute brain and spinal cord injury. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2016, 16, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2011, 34, 620–621. [Google Scholar]
  96. Ning, B.; Gao, L.; Liu, R.H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.S.; Chen, Z.Y. MicroRNAs in spinal cord injury: Potential roles and therapeutic implications. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 10, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Theis, T.; Yoo, M.; Park, C.S.; Chen, J.; Kugler, S.; Gibbs, K.M.; Schachner, M. Lentiviral delivery of mir-133b improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Louw, A.M.; Kolar, M.K.; Novikova, L.N.; Kingham, P.J.; Wiberg, M.; Kjems, J.; Novikov, L.N. Chitosan polyplex mediated delivery of miRNA-124 reduces activation of microglial cells in vitro and in rat models of spinal cord injury. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2016, 12, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sandner, B.; Prang, P.; Rivera, F.J.; Aigner, L.; Blesch, A.; Weidner, N. Neural stem cells for spinal cord repair. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 349, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ramasamy, S.; Yu, F.; Hong Yu, Y.; Srivats, H.; Dawe, G.S.; Ahmed, S. Nogor1 and pirb signaling stimulates neural stem cell survival and proliferation. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1636–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Rolando, C.; Parolisi, R.; Boda, E.; Schwab, M.E.; Rossi, F.; Buffo, A. Distinct roles of nogo-a and nogo receptor 1 in the homeostatic regulation of adult neural stem cell function and neuroblast migration. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 17788–17799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chen, N.; Cen, J.S.; Wang, J.; Qin, G.; Long, L.; Wang, L.; Wei, F.; Xiang, Q.; Deng, D.Y.; Wan, Y. Targeted inhibition of leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 1 in transplanted neural stem cells promotes neuronal differentiation and functional recovery in rats subjected to spinal cord injury. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 44, e146–e157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Thakore-Shah, K.; Koleilat, T.; Jan, M.; John, A.; Pyle, A.D. REST/NRSF knockdown alters survival, lineage differentiation and signaling in human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Low, W.C.; Rujitanaroj, P.O.; Lee, D.K.; Messersmith, P.B.; Stanton, L.W.; Goh, E.; Chew, S.Y. Nanofibrous scaffold-mediated rest knockdown to enhance neuronal differentiation of stem cells. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 3581–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Greco, S.J.; Smirnov, S.V.; Murthy, R.G.; Rameshwar, P. Synergy between the re-1 silencer of transcription and nfkappab in the repression of the neurotransmitter gene tac1 in human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 30039–30050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Patel, N.; Klassert, T.E.; Greco, S.J.; Patel, S.A.; Munoz, J.L.; Reddy, B.Y.; Bryan, M.; Campbell, N.; Kokorina, N.; Sabaawy, H.E.; et al. Developmental regulation of tac1 in peptidergic-induced human mesenchymal stem cells: Implication for spinal cord injury in zebrafish. Stem Cells Dev. 2012, 21, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wang, Y.T.; Lu, X.M.; Zhu, F.; Huang, P.; Yu, Y.; Zeng, L.; Long, Z.Y.; Wu, Y.M. The use of a gold nanoparticle-based adjuvant to improve the therapeutic efficacy of HNGR-FC protein immunization in spinal cord-injured rats. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 7988–7998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Liu, B.P.; Fournier, A.; GrandPre, T.; Strittmatter, S.M. Myelin-associated glycoprotein as a functional ligand for the nogo-66 receptor. Science 2002, 297, 1190–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Wang, K.C.; Koprivica, V.; Kim, J.A.; Sivasankaran, R.; Guo, Y.; Neve, R.L.; He, Z. Oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is a nogo receptor ligand that inhibits neurite outgrowth. Nature 2002, 417, 941–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lee, J.K.; Geoffroy, C.G.; Chan, A.F.; Tolentino, K.E.; Crawford, M.J.; Leal, M.A.; Kang, B.; Zheng, B. Assessing spinal axon regeneration and sprouting in nogo-, mag-, and omgp-deficient mice. Neuron 2010, 66, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Wang, S.; Shen, Y. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with nogo-66 receptor gene silencing for repair of spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2014, 9, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Wang, K.C.; Kim, J.A.; Sivasankaran, R.; Segal, R.; He, Z. P75 interacts with the nogo receptor as a co-receptor for nogo, mag and omgp. Nature 2002, 420, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Mi, S.; Lee, X.; Shao, Z.; Thill, G.; Ji, B.; Relton, J.; Levesque, M.; Allaire, N.; Perrin, S.; Sands, B.; et al. Lingo-1 is a component of the nogo-66 receptor/p75 signaling complex. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Loov, C.; Fernqvist, M.; Walmsley, A.; Marklund, N.; Erlandsson, A. Neutralization of lingo-1 during in vitro differentiation of neural stem cells results in proliferation of immature neurons. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Wang, J.; Ye, Z.; Zheng, S.; Chen, L.; Wan, Y.; Deng, Y.; Yang, R. Lingo-1 shRNA and notch signaling inhibitor dapt promote differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells into neurons. Brain Res. 2016, 1634, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wu, H.F.; Cen, J.S.; Zhong, Q.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Deng, D.Y.; Wan, Y. The promotion of functional recovery and nerve regeneration after spinal cord injury by lentiviral vectors encoding lingo-1 shrna delivered by pluronic f-127. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 1686–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tanaka, K.; Kelly, C.E.; Goh, K.Y.; Lim, K.B.; Ibanez, C.F. Death domain signaling by disulfide-linked dimers of the p75 neurotrophin receptor mediates neuronal death in the CNS. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 5587–5595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Edalat, H.; Hajebrahimi, Z.; Movahedin, M.; Tavallaei, M.; Amiri, S.; Mowla, S.J. P75ntr suppression in rat bone marrow stromal stem cells significantly reduced their rate of apoptosis during neural differentiation. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 498, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Edalat, H.; Hajebrahimi, Z.; Pirhajati, V.; Movahedin, M.; Tavallaei, M.; Soroush, M.R.; Mowla, S.J. Transplanting p75-suppressed bone marrow stromal cells promotes functional behavior in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Iran. Biomed. J. 2013, 17, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Plemel, J.R.; Keough, M.B.; Duncan, G.J.; Sparling, J.S.; Yong, V.W.; Stys, P.K.; Tetzlaff, W. Remyelination after spinal cord injury: Is it a target for repair? Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 117, 54–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Kremer, D.; Gottle, P.; Hartung, H.P.; Kury, P. Pushing forward: Remyelination as the new frontier in CNS diseases. Trends Neurosci. 2016, 39, 246–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Shao, Z.; Browning, J.L.; Lee, X.; Scott, M.L.; Shulga-Morskaya, S.; Allaire, N.; Thill, G.; Levesque, M.; Sah, D.; McCoy, J.M.; et al. Taj/troy, an orphan TNF receptor family member, binds nogo-66 receptor 1 and regulates axonal regeneration. Neuron 2005, 45, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Baer, A.S.; Syed, Y.A.; Kang, S.U.; Mitteregger, D.; Vig, R.; Ffrench-Constant, C.; Franklin, R.J.; Altmann, F.; Lubec, G.; Kotter, M.R. Myelin-mediated inhibition of oligodendrocyte precursor differentiation can be overcome by pharmacological modulation of FYN-RHOA and protein kinase C signalling. Brain J. Neurol. 2009, 132, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kotter, M.R.; Li, W.W.; Zhao, C.; Franklin, R.J. Myelin impairs CNS remyelination by inhibiting oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Sun, L.; Liu, S.; Sun, Q.; Li, Z.; Xu, F.; Hou, C.; Harada, T.; Chu, M.; Xu, K.; Feng, X.; et al. Inhibition of troy promotes OPC differentiation and increases therapeutic efficacy of OPC graft for spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2014, 23, 2104–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Baek, S.T.; Kerjan, G.; Bielas, S.L.; Lee, J.E.; Fenstermaker, A.G.; Novarino, G.; Gleeson, J.G. Off-target effect of doublecortin family shRNA on neuronal migration associated with endogenous microrna dysregulation. Neuron 2014, 82, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 08 00135 g001 550
Figure 1. Use of stem cells as vectors for transfer of RNAi in treatment of CNS diseases. There are three possible pathways for the purpose of treatment: (1) RNAi-targeted genes inhibit neuronal differentiation of stem cells; (2) the targeted genes of RNAi regulate the migration of stem cells toward the injured sites; (3) the RNAi transfers from the stem cells to other cells directly or indirectly, leading to inhibition of targeted genes.
Figure 1. Use of stem cells as vectors for transfer of RNAi in treatment of CNS diseases. There are three possible pathways for the purpose of treatment: (1) RNAi-targeted genes inhibit neuronal differentiation of stem cells; (2) the targeted genes of RNAi regulate the migration of stem cells toward the injured sites; (3) the RNAi transfers from the stem cells to other cells directly or indirectly, leading to inhibition of targeted genes.
Genes 08 00135 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hou, X.-Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, F.-G.; Zhao, X.-M.; Zhang, H.-T. Combination of RNA Interference and Stem Cells for Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases. Genes 2017, 8, 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8050135

AMA Style

Hou X-Q, Wang L, Wang F-G, Zhao X-M, Zhang H-T. Combination of RNA Interference and Stem Cells for Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases. Genes. 2017; 8(5):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8050135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hou, Xue-Qin, Lei Wang, Fu-Gang Wang, Xiao-Min Zhao, and Han-Ting Zhang. 2017. "Combination of RNA Interference and Stem Cells for Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases" Genes 8, no. 5: 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8050135

APA Style

Hou, X.-Q., Wang, L., Wang, F.-G., Zhao, X.-M., & Zhang, H.-T. (2017). Combination of RNA Interference and Stem Cells for Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases. Genes, 8(5), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8050135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop