Next Article in Journal
Polymeric Delivery System for mRNA Therapeutics: Design Principles and Recent Advances
Previous Article in Journal
The Correlation Between the Presence of BRAFV600E and TERT Promoter Mutation and the Response to Treatment with Iodine 131 in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Next-Generation Sequencing and Variant Cataloguing for Screening and Diagnosis of Mucolipidoses and Other Lysosome-Related Organelle Disorders, Including Lysosomal Membrane or Transport Disorders

by
Irina Vlasova-St. Louis
1,* and
Svetlana Khaiboullina
2
1
Vinnana AI LLC, Sheridan, WY 82601, USA
2
Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2026, 17(6), 643; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17060643
Submission received: 23 March 2026 / Revised: 18 April 2026 / Accepted: 30 April 2026 / Published: 31 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Bioinformatics)

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has transformed the diagnostic landscape for inherited metabolic diseases by enabling high-resolution detection of pathogenic variants across genetically heterogeneous lysosomal pathways. This is particularly impactful for lysosomal diseases (LDs), including the mucolipidoses (ML I–IV), and for disorders involving lysosomal membranes, transporters, and lysosome-related organelles (LROs). These conditions often present with overlapping biochemical and clinical features that historically complicated accurate diagnosis. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies in the detection and interpretation of variants underlying mucolipidoses types I-IV and selected LRO and lysosomal membrane transport disorders. We summarize expanded variant catalogues, genotype–phenotype correlations, and functional evidence informing pathogenicity classification. In addition, we discuss the integration of NGS into newborn screening and population-level genomics. Collectively, these advances have refined disease definitions, resolved diagnostically challenging cases, and reshaped clinical workflows across the LD and LRO disease spectra.

1. Introduction

Inherited metabolic diseases involving lysosome metabolism, storage pathways, and lysosome-related organelles encompass a broad and expanding spectrum of disorders unified by disruptions in intracellular degradation, trafficking, or membrane transport. Historically, diagnosis relied heavily on biochemical testing and clinical pattern recognition—methods that were often insufficient for diseases with extensive allelic heterogeneity, variable phenotypes, or overlapping clinical features [1,2]. Over the past decade, NGS has fundamentally reshaped this landscape by enabling the simultaneous evaluation of hundreds to thousands of gene variants, with high analytical sensitivity [3,4]. Targeted NGS panels are widely used as a cost-effective first-line approach in clinically well-defined cases [5]. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) extends analysis to coding regions and is also useful for population screening and carrier detection, particularly in populations with high rates of consanguinity [6,7,8]. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) enables more comprehensive detection of structural variants, intronic changes, and regulatory elements that may be missed by WES [9]. In addition, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) provides functional insight by identifying aberrant splicing, exon skipping, and mRNA transcript-level effects that cannot be reliably inferred from DNA-based approaches alone. In diagnostically challenging cases, long-read sequencing technologies, including Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), further improve variant detection by resolving complex rearrangements, repetitive regions, and allele phasing. In clinical practice, a tiered diagnostic strategy is often most efficient. Targeted panels or WES with copy-number variant analysis are appropriate for patients with a clear clinical suspicion of lysosomal disease, while WGS, RNA-seq, or long-read sequencing may be more effective in cases with atypical, late-onset, or nonspecific presentations, when WES yields negative results, or when the functional impact of identified variants remains unclear. The clinical interpretation of variants identified through NGS is largely guided by standardized frameworks, most notably the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria, under which the majority of reported variants are classified into pathogenicity categories to support diagnostic decision-making [10].
Lysosomes and their associated organelles play a central role in cellular homeostasis by mediating macromolecular degradation, membrane turnover, and vesicular transport. Defects in lysosomal enzymes, trafficking machinery, ion channels, or membrane transporters give rise to a diverse group of nearly 90 LD and LRO disorders [3,11]. Among these, the mucolipidoses (ML I-IV) occupy a key position, representing a combination of defects in lysosomal enzyme processing, trafficking, and membrane function [12]. NGS has been transformative for LDs, including the mucolipidoses (ML I-IV), where multiple genes (e.g., NEU1, GNPTAB, GNPTG, MCOLN1) converge on shared cellular pathways but produce markedly variable phenotypes. The discovery of novel missense, nonsense, frameshifts, splice-altering, and structural variants through large-scale sequencing has refined genotype–phenotype correlations and expanded recognized disease boundaries. Beyond classical LDs, NGS has elucidated the molecular basis of disorders involving lysosomal membranes and transporters (e.g., CTNS, SCARB2, SLC17A5) and biogenesis defects affecting lysosome-related organelles such as melanosomes and platelet dense granules (e.g., HPS genes, which are briefly overviewed below). Many of these disorders lie at the interface between LDs and organelle biogenesis defects, reinforcing the importance of NGS in gene-disease pathogenicity assessments, reducing diagnostic odysseys, updating variant catalogues and clarification of variants’ pathogenicity, and implications for clinical diagnostics, newborn screening, and precision medicine initiatives.

2. Mucolipidoses

MLs are a group of rare, autosomal recessive lysosomal diseases characterized by impaired lysosomal enzyme function, processing, or intracellular trafficking. As a consequence, undegraded lipids, glycoproteins, and oligosaccharides accumulate within lysosomes in multiple tissues, leading to progressive multisystem pathology. Based on their molecular etiology, four classical forms are recognized: ML I (sialidosis), ML II (I-cell disease), ML III (pseudo-Hurler polydystrophy), and ML IV (MCOLN1-related disease) [13,14,15].
Although mucolipidoses share several overlapping clinical features (among themselves and with other LDs), including coarse facial features, dysostosis multiplex, joint stiffness, psychomotor delay, and organomegaly, the severity, onset, and clinical course vary widely. This variability largely reflects the degree of residual lysosomal enzyme activity and the molecular nature of the underlying pathogenic variants. The introduction of NGS has substantially expanded the known pathogenic variant spectrum of NEU1, GNPTAB, GNPTG, and MCOLN1, enabling the identification of numerous previously unrecognized alleles, including intronic splice-altering variants, deep intronic variants, copy-number changes, and population-specific founder mutations. Comprehensive molecular studies have revealed clear genotype–phenotype correlations across many ML subtypes and underscored the critical role of NGS-based molecular confirmation for accurate diagnosis, subclassification, and genetic counseling [16].

2.1. Mucolipidosis Type I (ICD-11: 5C71.3)

2.1.1. Pathophysiology and Clinical Features

ML I, also known as sialidosis, is caused by deficient activity of neuraminidase 1 (NEU1), a lysosomal exoglycosidase responsible for removing terminal sialic acid residues from sialoglycoconjugates (Figure 1). NEU1 protein functions as part of a lysosomal multienzyme complex that includes β-galactosidase and protective protein/cathepsin A (PPCA), which is essential for NEU1 stability and catalytic activity [17]. Loss of NEU1 activity destabilizes this complex and results in the intralysosomal accumulation of sialylated glycoproteins and oligosaccharides, leading to widespread cellular dysfunction. Beyond its canonical lysosomal role, NEU1 has emerged as a regulator of neuroimmune homeostasis. Recent studies demonstrate that NEU1 modulates microglial activation through regulation of TREM2 stability and signaling, implicating NEU1 deficiency in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes observed in sialidosis [18].
Clinically, sialidosis is classified into two major phenotypic subtypes:
  • Type I (late-onset sialidosis): Typically presents in adolescence or adulthood with progressive myoclonus, generalized seizures, ataxia, cherry-red macular spots, and relatively preserved early neurodevelopment [13,19,20].
  • Type II (early-onset sialidosis): Presents in infancy or childhood with coarse facial features, hepatosplenomegaly, dysostosis multiplex, developmental delay, and early-onset neurodegeneration, often with a rapidly progressive course [21]. The differential diagnostic significance of ocular manifestations, particularly cherry-red macular spots as a pathognomonic finding for ML I or ML II, remains debated, as these findings have been reported inconsistently across both type I and type II ML phenotypes [20,21].

2.1.2. Pathogenic Variants in NEU1

Pathogenic variants in NEU1 include missense, nonsense, frameshift, splice-site, and copy-number alterations, most commonly occurring in compound heterozygous configurations (ClinVar_NEU1). Disease severity correlates strongly with residual neuraminidase activity, with levels above ~15% consistently associated with attenuated, late-onset phenotypes, while null or functionally null variants result in severe early-onset disease [22,23,24]. Isolated type I sialidosis is most frequently associated with compound heterozygous hypomorphic missense variants that preserve partial enzymatic activity. Recurrent variants linked to this phenotype include p.Ser182Gly, p.Arg294Cys, p.Gly277Arg, p.Pro80Leu, p.Val143Glu, p.Asp177Val, p.His337Arg, p.Arg280Gln, p.Ser233Arg, p.Asp135Asn, p.Tyr268Cys, as well as p.Tyr186Cys and p.Arg267Trp, observed across multiple cohorts and ethnic backgrounds. These genotypes are typically associated with adolescent or adult onset, progressive myoclonus, seizures, ataxia, and variable or absent ocular involvement [19,20,22,24,25,26]. Homozygous hypomorphic missense variants, and rarely, intronic variants (e.g., c.1021+4A>T) may also result in type I disease, particularly in consanguineous families [27]. Variants such as p.Asp135Asn, p.Arg294Cys and p.Arg305Pro have been identified in homozygous states and are associated with non-neuronopathic or attenuated phenotypes when residual enzymatic activity of the protein is preserved. Population-specific enrichment of certain alleles has been documented, most notably p.Ser182Gly in East Asian populations, and p.Asp135Asn in Turkish families, consistent with founder effects influencing regional mutational spectra [26,28,29]. Variants disrupting catalytic or structurally critical domains of NEU1 protein are associated with severe early-onset type II sialidosis, including nonsynonymous changes. Examples include p.Arg341Gly and p.Tyr370Cys, which directly impair catalytic function and behave as functionally null alleles. Severe infantile phenotypes are also consistently associated with truncating variants, including nonsense and frameshift mutations such as p.Arg206Ter, p.Arg341Ter, p.Glu209SerfsTer94, and p.Pro316fs, as well as multi-exon deletions, reflecting complete loss of enzyme activity [21,23,24,26,30]. The structural organization of the NEU1 protein and the distribution of pathogenic variants within the NEU1 gene, together with their functional and phenotypic consequences, have been comprehensively characterized in prior studies [31], providing established frameworks for genotype–phenotype interpretation.
No approved enzyme replacement therapy or gene therapy is available yet for sialidoses, underscoring the importance of comprehensive NGS-based approaches for accurate diagnosis, prognosis, and genetic counseling.

2.2. Mucolipidosis II (ICD-11: 5C71.0)

2.2.1. Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation

ML II is a rare, severe, and typically fatal lysosomal trafficking disorder caused by pathogenic variants in GNPTAB, which encodes the α/β precursor subunits of N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase (GlcNAc-1-PTase) (Figure 1). This enzyme catalyzes the first step in the synthesis of the mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) signal required for proper lysosomal targeting of acid hydrolases. Near-complete loss of GlcNAc-1-PTase activity results in misrouting and extracellular secretion of lysosomal enzymes, leading to secondary lysosomal deficiency and intracellular accumulation of undegraded substrates, accompanied by elevated plasma lysosomal enzyme activities [32,33]. Clinically, ML II presents in early infancy with severe skeletal dysplasia, coarse facial features, gingival hypertrophy, progressive joint contractures, cardiopulmonary disease, and profound global developmental arrest. Disease progression is rapid, and prognosis is poor, with most affected individuals dying in early childhood [34]. ML II represents the severe end of the GNPTAB-related disease spectrum, which also includes ML IIIα/β and intermediate phenotypes. Because clinical overlap between these forms is substantial, molecular diagnosis using NGS is essential and represents the first-line diagnostic approach [35].

2.2.2. Pathogenic Variants in GNPTAB

GNPTAB encodes the precursor of α/β subunits, essential for the Golgi localization and catalytic activity of GlcNAc-1-PTase. Classical ML II is most commonly caused by biallelic truncating variants, including nonsense, frameshift, and canonical splice-site mutations, which abolish enzyme activity. Recurrent truncating variants associated with severe infantile phenotypes include p.Gln104Ter, p.Trp894Ter, p.Ser1058Ter, p.Arg1189Ter, p.Arg225Ter, p.Arg364Ter, p.Arg587Ter, and frameshift variants such as p.His1158fsTer15, p.Leu1168ProfsTer5, p.Lys898SerfsTer13 observed across multiple ethnic cohorts [33,36,37,38]. Recent cohort studies further demonstrate that combinations of truncating and splice-site variants consistently result in classical ML II. Examples include compound heterozygotes p.Gly508AspfsTer39 and c.3335+5G>A, p.Thr30HisfsTer24 and Lys850AsnfsTer10, p.Cys528Arg and c.2715+1G>A, p.Lys545SerfsTer16 and c.2715+1G>A, p.Thr1032HisfsTer11 and c.571+4A>G, and homozygous p.Gln802Ter, all of which are associated with severe early-onset disease [39]. Several novel pathogenic splice site variants c.3335+5G>A, c.571+4A>G, c.1284+1G>A, and c.1284+1G>T have been discovered by WGS in these studies [39,40]. The splicing mutation c.2715+1G>A has been identified as one of the most frequent pathogenic variants in GNPTAB, particularly in the Chinese population [41].
The frameshift variant p.Leu1168fs represents one of the most frequently reported GNPTAB pathogenic alleles worldwide and has been identified in both homozygous and compound heterozygous states in multiple populations [42,43,44]. Owing to its high prevalence and consistent association with classical ML II, this variant has become a widely used reference allele in preclinical gene therapy studies [45]. The missense p.Lys4Gln variant has been identified in compound heterozygous states with truncating alleles, including p.Leu655Serfs and p.Phe730fs, and is associated with intermediate ML II/III phenotypes reflecting partial preservation of GlcNAc-1-PTase activity [43,46]. Mechanistically, N-terminal missense variants impair Golgi retention of GlcNAc-1-PTase, leading to its aberrant lysosomal degradation rather than complete loss of synthesis. Additional conserved missense variants, including p.Ala387Val, p.Arg364Cys, and p.Arg986Ser have been reported in patients with residual enzymatic activity and intermediate disease severity; however, the full phenotype depends on the pathogenicity of the variant on the other allele [33,37,47,48]. Large deletions, duplications, and complex rearrangements involving GNPTAB represent an important but often underrecognized cause of ML II. Increasing evidence from curated databases (e.g., ClinVar_GNPTAB) highlights a broad spectrum of structural and complex variants, including intragenic duplications affecting splice regions (e.g., c.3250-10_3335+112dup, c.3250-16_3335+104dup), complex indels such as c.780_895delinsTTTTTATTATGGGAT (p.Leu260fs), as well as large genomic rearrangements and copy-number changes, including multi-exon deletions and duplications (e.g., NC_000012.11:g.(102155542_102157979) (102190541_102224336)del and NC_000012.11:g.(?102190445)(102190550?)dup), all contributing to disease pathogenesis [49]. Earlier NGS studies of Brazilian patients (clinically and biochemically diagnosed with ML II or III α/β) identified six novel mutations: p.Asp76Gly, p.Ser385Leu, p.Gln278LysfsTer3, p.His588GlnfsTer27, p.Asn642LeufsTer10, and p.Tyr1111Ter, allowing this cohort to be stratified by genotype [50]. These findings are supported by functional studies demonstrating that missense mutations in GNPTAB can impair GlcNAc-1-PTase enzyme activity through distinct mechanisms, including protein mislocalization and defective processing, thereby contributing to disease severity and phenotypic variability [50].
Rare cases of dual genetic pathology have been reported, such as combined GNPTAB frameshift variants (e.g., c.732_733delAA) with a pathogenic variant in an unrelated gene (NDUFA12, p.Arg60Ter), resulting in unusually severe infantile phenotypes [51]. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been explored experimentally in ML II, with limited case-based evidence suggesting potential modest prolongation of survival or partial stabilization of disease progression. However, due to small sample sizes, heterogeneous protocols, and short follow-up durations, the therapeutic benefit of HSCT in ML II remains uncertain, and controlled longitudinal studies are required before clinical recommendations can be made [37].

2.3. Mucolipidosis III (ICD-11: 5C71.1)

2.3.1. Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation

ML III results from a partial deficiency of N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase (GlcNAc-1-PTase), leading to reduced, but not absent, mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) tagging of lysosomal hydrolases and preservation of residual lysosomal targeting (Figure 1). This partial enzymatic activity underlies the attenuated clinical course compared with ML II. Disease onset typically occurs between early childhood and adolescence and is characterized by progressive joint stiffness and pain, short stature, mild coarsening of facial features, valvular heart disease, and largely preserved cognitive function [32,42,52]. NGS-based cohort studies have demonstrated that ML III α/β is caused by hypomorphic variants in GNPTAB, whereas ML III γ is associated with pathogenic variants in GNPTG—both subtypes exhibiting similar phenotypes, despite distinct genetic etiologies [53]. Therefore, ML II and ML III α/β, or ML III γ represent a biochemical continuum defined by residual GlcNAc-1-PTase activity. Severe truncating variants typically abolish enzyme function and result in ML II, whereas moderate to hypomorphic variants that preserve partial enzyme activity lead to ML III, producing a spectrum of phenotypes that correlate with the degree of residual enzyme activity [35].

2.3.2. Pathogenic Variants in GNPTG

Pathogenic variants in GNPTG, responsible for ML III γ, typically include combinations of splice-site and truncating alleles. An uncommon early-onset ML III γ phenotype has been associated with compound heterozygous GNPTG variants comprising a canonical splice mutation (c.110+1G>A) and a frameshift deletion p.Asp219fsTer9, presenting with early hand stiffness and progressive joint involvement that can mimic rheumatologic disease, thereby expanding the recognized phenotypic spectrum of ML III γ [52]. Missense variants that permit partial assembly of the GlcNAc-1-PTase complex are preferentially associated with ML III rather than ML II. Examples include GNPTAB p.Arg587Pro and GNPTG p.Cys142Arg, which disrupt protein function without complete loss of enzymatic activity and are consistently linked to milder, non-neuronopathic phenotypes [54].
Genome-wide approaches have also enabled the detection of rare and complex variants not identifiable by earlier methods, with curated pathogenic variants deposited in ClinVar (ClinVar_GNPTG) Recent studies suggest that NGS-based newborn screening, combined with biochemical assays such as elevated circulating lysosomal enzyme activity, may improve early recognition of ML II or III in presymptomatic or atypical cases, supporting the feasibility of population-based newborn screening [42,55]. Collectively, molecular data support re-conceptualizing mucolipidoses II and III as a continuous spectrum of gene-variant-defined disorders rather than vaguely separated clinical entities, facilitating accurate diagnosis, prognostication, and future therapeutic stratification [35].

2.4. Mucolipidosis IV (ICD-11: 5C71.2)

2.4.1. Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation

ML IV is genetically and mechanistically distinct from ML II/III. It results from pathogenic variants in the MCOLN1 gene, encoding the mucolipin-1 protein (TRPML1), a lysosomal cation channel involved in calcium release, regulation of membrane trafficking, and autophagosome-lysosome fusion (Figure 1) [56,57]. Loss of TRPML1 disrupts autophagic flux, causes accumulation of lipofuscin and phospholipids, and selectively impairs neuronal and retinal cell survival. Clinically, ML IV presents in infancy with hypotonia, global psychomotor delay, corneal clouding, retinal degeneration, achlorhydria with secondary iron-deficiency anemia, and progressive visual impairment [15]. Neuroimaging in ML IV typically reveals corpus callosum hypoplasia, diffuse white-matter attenuation, and cerebellar atrophy [58].

2.4.2. Pathogenic Variants in MCOLN1

Pathogenicity of MCOLN1 variants varies widely ranging from hypomorphic variants that preserve up to 40% of channel function and correlate with milder or slowly progressive phenotypes to severe deficiency and null variants. Some variants are particularly prevalent in Ashkenazi Jewish or Middle-Eastern populations and frequently diagnosed by NGS in clinical laboratories, including c.237+5G>A, p.Thr232Pro, p.Phe465Leu, p.Arg322Ter, p.Phe408del [59,60]. Dozens of canonical splice-site variants have recently been identified by WES in individuals with ML IV (e.g., c.405+1G>A, c.406-2A>G, c.680+1G>A), as well as biallelic pathogenic missense variants such as p.Tyr436His, p.Gly319Asp, p.Asp362Tyr, p.Thr121Met (ClinVar_MCOLN1) [15,61,62,63]. Moreover, heterozygous pathogenic variants in MCOLN1 have recently been associated with Lisch epithelial corneal dystrophy (LECD) through studying multiple affected families carrying pathogenic nonsense variants p.Arg172Ter and p.Cys192Ter over several generations [64]. LECD is widely underdiagnosed, and establishing a definitive genetic diagnosis is essential. Novel gene therapy approaches to treat MCOLN1-related pathologies with systemic delivery of a newer-generation adeno-associated virus vectors (AAV-CPP16) are currently under development [65].
Meta-analyses of NGS studies and natural history studies across mucolipidoses demonstrate distinctive genotype–phenotype correlations: severe loss of lysosomal enzyme or trafficking function correlates with early-onset and increased mortality (as in classic ML II), while partial residual protein activity is associated with attenuated forms and patient survival into adolescence or adulthood (described in ML III) [16,24,66]. Similar phenotype gradients are reported in ML I cohorts with NEU1 missense variants linked to milder late-onset disease, and ML IV patient series that document variable neurological progression over the lifespan in MCOLN1-related diseases.

3. Other Lysosome-Related Organelle Disorders, Including Lysosomal Membrane or Transport

Lysosomes do not function in isolation. They operate within an extended family of specialized vesicular compartments collectively termed LROs. Although LROs share many molecular features with lysosomes, they are structurally and functionally adapted to carry out distinct physiological roles: melanosomes regulate pigmentation, platelet dense granules facilitate hemostasis, and lamellar bodies manage pulmonary surfactant homeostasis [67,68]. When any component of the trafficking machinery or membrane apparatus necessary for LRO function is disrupted, highly tissue-specific disorders arise that blur the boundaries between classic LDs and defects of organelle biogenesis. NGS has been instrumental in elucidating these conditions [69]. Variants in LRO-associated genes often manifest with subtle or pleiotropic phenotypes, making unbiased genome-wide approaches essential for distinguishing pathogenic variants from benign polymorphisms. Comprehensive genomic characterization of these networks also enhances clinical diagnostic accuracy for all LDs by providing well-curated variant reference sets, thereby reducing misclassification in clinical variant interpretation pipelines.

3.1. Pathogenic Variants in CTNS Are Causative for Cystinosis (ICD-11: 5C74.0)

3.1.1. Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation

Cystinosis is the prototype disorder of lysosomal membrane transport. The CTNS gene encodes cystinosin, a proton-driven lysosomal exporter that translocates cystine from the lysosomal lumen into the cytoplasm (Figure 1). Loss or dysfunction of cystinosin results in progressive intra-lysosomal accumulation of cystine and formation of crystals, triggering cellular injury across multiple tissues [70]. Several types of cystinosis have been described (see Table 1) [71,72].
Because cystinosis has early-onset and effective targeted therapy options, it is a strong candidate for newborn genomic screening. WES and WGS performed from dried blood spots have demonstrated feasibility for early identification and genotype-guided management.

3.1.2. Pathogenic Variants in CTNS

More than 150 pathogenic variants have been identified in the CTNS, including missense, nonsense, frameshift, splice-site, and large structural variants. NGS-based cohort studies demonstrate a strong correlation between variant class, predicted impact on cystinosin function, and clinical severity, making cystinosis one of the best-characterized lysosomal membrane transport disorders in terms of genotype–phenotype relationships.
Missense variants are frequently associated with residual cystinosin activity and milder or atypical presentations, such as juvenile or ocular cystinosis, although clinical expression depends on the allelic configuration. Recurrent and novel missense alleles include p.Gly308Arg, p.Leu158Pro, p.Gly339Arg, p.Gln88Lys, p.Ser139Tyr, and p.Ser141Phe [72,73,74,75]. Variants such as p.Tyr173Cys have been repeatedly associated with later-onset disease, particularly when paired with another hypomorphic allele [76]. These variants preserve partial transporter function, and generally correlate with slower renal progression and delayed extrarenal manifestations, although protein domain involvement and allelic combination may influence severity.
Truncating variants, including frameshift and nonsense mutations, are strongly associated with classic infantile nephropathic cystinosis due to near-complete loss of cystinosin function. Examples include p.Thr334Profs65, p.Gly258SerfsTer30, p.Gly258SerfsTer30, p.Gln108ArgfsTer10, p.Ser86Phefs38, and p.Thr7Phefs7 [73,74,77]. These alleles result in early-onset renal Fanconi syndrome and rapid progression to end-stage kidney disease. Similarly, nonsense variants introduce premature termination codons, phenocopying null alleles. Pathogenic splice-site variants, such as c.681+7delC and c.971-1G>C, disrupt normal transcript processing and are generally associated with moderate-to-severe disease depending on the extent of residual protein production [73]. Long-read NGS and WGS have been particularly informative in resolving complex CTNS structural variants, including the recurrent ~57 kb deletion spanning exons 1–10, a 20.3 kb deletion, several >1 kb insertions, and repetitive-region breakpoint rearrangements, which are not reliably detected by short-read sequencing [78,79]. Such large structural variants are consistently associated with severe infantile phenotypes. Notably, a recent clinical trial of an investigational gene therapy (self-inactivating lentiviral vector) included five patients carrying the recurrent ~57 kb deletion either in homozygous form or in compound heterozygosity with a second pathogenic CTNS variant [80]. Computational analyses integrating NGS datasets have additionally predicted 19 novel missense variants with high pathogenicity scores, expanding the candidate mutational spectrum and highlighting the need for functional validation to refine genotype–phenotype correlations [81]. Lifelong cysteamine therapy remains the standard of care for cystinosis. By converting lysosomal cystine into a mixed disulfide, capable of exiting the lysosome via alternative transport pathways, cysteamine significantly slows renal deterioration and improves growth when initiated early. NGS-based studies indicate that residual cystinosin activity exceeding ~40%, often seen in individuals with missense or hypomorphic splice variants, predicts improved long-term survival, preserved motor function, and delayed extrarenal complications [72,82]. Finally, NGS-based carrier screening and genetic counseling remain best practices for disease prevention in high-risk populations, enabling informed reproductive decision-making and reduction in disease incidence [83].

3.2. Pathogenic Variants in SCARB2 Are Causative for Action Myoclonus Renal Failure Syndrome (ICD-11: 5C74.4)

3.2.1. Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation

SCARB2 encodes lysosomal integral membrane protein type 2 (LIMP2), a pivotal receptor mediating the trafficking of β-glucocerebrosidase (GBA) from the Golgi to lysosomes, where the enzyme is required for sphingolipid degradation (Figure 1). The enzyme β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase) depends on LIMP2 for lysosomal trafficking [84]. When LIMP2 is defective or null, GBA fails to reach its destination, impairing lipid catabolism within neurons and renal proximal tubular cells, which causes lysosomal dysfunction, membrane instability (or even lysosomal membrane rupture, as was shown in a Caenorhabditis elegans model) [85]. Biallelic loss-of-function variants in SCARB2 result in Action Myoclonus–Renal Failure (AMRF) syndrome, the classical phenotype. It presents in late adolescence with progressive myoclonic epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural hearing loss, and renal failure due to glomerulosclerosis [86].

3.2.2. Pathogenic Variants in SCARB2

Biallelic SCARB2 variants (predominantly missense and frameshifts) have been reported by NGS, including truncating and splice variants like p.Trp178Ter, c.1239+1G>T, c.1116-2A>C, c.995-1G>A, c.435_436insAG, p.Gln288Ter, p.Glu420ArgfsTer5, p.Tyr222Ter, p.Leu14ProfsTer35, p.Asn45MetfsTer?, c.1187+5G>T, etc., which are associated with phenotypic variability in the severity and progression of neurological and renal manifestations (ClinVar_SCARB2) [87,88,89]. The above-mentioned mutations were often reported in several generations of consanguineous families with varying degrees of neuropathy, seizures, and renal involvement [90].
Multiple recent NGS reports have expanded the variant catalogue with greater than 50 new alleles, strengthening not only the SCARB2-AMRF gene disease relationship, but also an intricate GBA molecular crosstalk within Gaucher and Parkinson’s disease pathogeneses [91]. Heterozygous SCARB2 variants may lead to haploinsufficiency of LIMP2, with consequent impairment of GBA trafficking and a possible contribution to susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease, although more studies are required to confirm this [92]. Miglustat, an inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, has been used in some patients, with mild improvement of symptoms [86].

3.3. Pathogenic Variants in SLC17A5 Are Causative for Sialic Acid Storage Disease (SASD) (ICD-11: 5C74.6)

3.3.1. Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation

The SLC17A5 gene encodes solute carrier family 17 member 5 (sialin), a lysosomal membrane transporter responsible for exporting free sialic acid, predominantly N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), from the lysosomal lumen into the cytoplasm following degradation of glycoproteins and glycolipids (Figure 1) [93]. Sialin functions as a proton-coupled transporter, and loss of its activity disrupts the normal efflux of sialic acid from lysosomes, leading to its intracellular accumulation and impairment of cellular homeostasis, particularly in neurons [93]. Deficiency of sialin causes SASD, a spectrum of autosomal recessive lysosomal disorders that includes a severe infantile form (infantile free sialic acid storage disease, IFSD) and a milder, later-onset phenotype historically referred to as Salla disease. These are now generally considered part of a continuous clinical spectrum rather than distinct entities [94]. In sialin-deficient cells, free sialic acid accumulates within lysosomes, leading to progressive cellular dysfunction, particularly affecting the central nervous system.
The severe infantile form typically presents in early infancy with developmental delay, coarse facial features, hepatosplenomegaly, and marked hypotonia, followed by rapid neurological deterioration. In contrast, milder SASD phenotypes present with early hypotonia and delayed motor development, followed by progressive neurological manifestations such as ataxia, nystagmus, and, in some cases, epilepsy. Neuroimaging commonly demonstrates hypomyelination and cerebral and cerebellar atrophy. Affected individuals often develop persistent ataxia and varying degrees of intellectual disability [95].
Biochemical confirmation may involve detection of elevated free sialic acid levels in urine or cultured cells; however, such specialized assays are not widely available in routine clinical laboratories [96]. Consequently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become the primary diagnostic approach for confirming SLC17A5-related disease, particularly in individuals presenting with nonspecific neurodevelopmental phenotypes.

3.3.2. Pathogenic Variants in SLC17A5

The SLC17A5 gene demonstrates substantial allelic heterogeneity, with reported pathogenic variants including missense substitutions, nonsense (truncating) variants, frameshift mutations, splice-site alterations, and larger structural variants detectable by genomic sequencing approaches. Data from ClinVar indicate that loss-of-function variants—particularly nonsense and frameshift mutations—are prominent, alongside copy number variants such as deletions and duplications, although the exact distribution may be influenced by reporting bias (ClinVar_SLC17A5). Representative truncating variants include p.Glu15Ter, p.Trp246Ter, p.Leu193fs, p.Tyr223fs, and p.Met1Ter. The missense variant p.Arg39Cys is a well-established founder mutation, particularly enriched in Finnish populations, and is strongly associated with the milder end of the SASD spectrum. Additional missense variants, such as p.Gly313Ala and p.Gly328Glu, have been identified through NGS studies and are predicted to affect functionally important luminal regions of sialin [94]. WGS has also revealed complex mutational mechanisms. For example, Tarailo-Graovac et al. described a homozygous ~6 kb LINE-1 retrotransposon insertion in intron 9 of SLC17A5, which introduces cryptic splice sites and leads to aberrant splicing of the transcript. This splicing defect results in the incorporation of intronic sequence, causing a frameshift and subsequent premature termination of the encoded protein [95]. These findings highlight the importance of approaches capable of detecting structural and noncoding variants. Because SASD shares overlapping clinical features with other lysosomal disorders, inclusion of SLC17A5 in targeted NGS panels is essential for timely diagnosis and for avoiding misclassification with phenotypically similar conditions.
At present, treatment for free sialic acid storage disease remains largely supportive. Due to the absence of disease-modifying therapies, the disorder does not currently meet the primary criteria for inclusion in the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) for newborn screening in the United States. Therefore, NGS-based carrier screening and molecular diagnosis remain the most effective strategies for identifying affected individuals and preventing recurrence within at-risk families.

3.4. Genes Affected in Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome (HPS) (ICD-11: 5C74.8)

HPS subtypes comprise a group of autosomal recessive disorders caused by defective biogenesis and trafficking of LROs, including melanosomes, platelet dense granules, and lamellar bodies (Figure 2). The clinical phenotype typically begins in infancy with hypopigmentation and bleeding manifestations, while additional systemic complications may develop later in childhood or adulthood. Platelets from individuals with HPS show a characteristic defect in the secretion of dense (δ)-granules, reflecting the absence or dysfunction of platelet dense (δ)-granules, which are CD63-positive organelles. Various molecular defects disrupt intracellular trafficking pathways mediated by the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complexes (BLOC-1, BLOC-2, and BLOC-3) and the adaptor protein complex AP-3. Impaired function of these complexes alters vesicular transport and cargo delivery to specialized organelles, resulting in the hallmark clinical features of oculocutaneous albinism and bleeding diathesis [97].
Additional complications, including progressive pulmonary fibrosis, granulomatous colitis, reduced visual acuity, immunodeficiency, neurodevelopmental abnormalities, and occasionally, impaired renal function, are increasingly recognized as genotype-dependent and subtype-specific, as described below. In particular, pulmonary fibrosis represents a major source of morbidity and mortality and occurs predominantly in HPS1, HPS2, and HPS4, whereas other subtypes more commonly exhibit milder phenotypes without significant pulmonary involvement [98,99]. Furthermore, the distribution of HPS subtypes reflects population-specific genetic architectures, including allelic heterogeneity and founder effects, resulting in distinct mutational spectra across different ethnic groups, for example, the high prevalence of HPS1 in Puerto Rican populations and the predominance of HPS1 and HPS6 variants, including multiple novel alleles, in East Asian cohorts such as Chinese patients [100,101].
The BLOC complexes play a central role in the biogenesis and maintenance of LROs, and pathogenic variants in genes encoding their subunits define distinct HPS subtypes. These complexes operate within a broader network of lysosomal trafficking regulators, including proteins associated with the BLOC-one-related complex (BORC), which governs lysosome positioning and membrane dynamics. Functional and structural overlap among these pathways contributes to partial phenotypic convergence across related trafficking disorders [102]. A key challenge in clinical genomics remains distinguishing pathogenic variants from benign findings in HPS-associated genes.
Recent advances in structural biology, including cryo-electron microscopy, have begun to resolve the architecture of BLOC complexes, providing insights into their assembly and interactions (Figure 2). Integration of structural data with genomic findings from patient sequencing allows prediction of how specific mutations disrupt protein binding, subcellular localization, and complex stability [103]. Complementary functional studies using cellular and in vitro models have further defined the coordinated roles of BLOC-1, BLOC-2, BLOC-3, AP-3, and the homotypic fusion and protein sorting complex in regulating vesicle formation, targeting, and fusion during LRO maturation. Together, these approaches have significantly advanced understanding of HPS molecular pathogenesis and genotype–phenotype correlations [104,105].

3.4.1. Pathogenic Variants in HPS1

Pathogenic variants in HPS1, encoding a subunit of the BLOC-3 complex, represent the most common cause of HPS worldwide and account for the largest number of pathogenic variants identified to date. Loss-of-function variants impair endosomal trafficking pathways required for melanosome maturation and platelet dense granule biogenesis (Figure 2). Clinically, individuals affected with HPS type 1 present with severe hypopigmentation and bleeding diathesis, together with a high risk of progressive pulmonary fibrosis and impaired renal function that usually manifests in adulthood [106,107].
Since the introduction of NGS, numerous additional pathogenic variants have been identified globally, including several founder alleles, and both the protein structure and the distribution of HPS1 variants are now well described (ClinVar_HPS1) [108]. These include primarily frameshift variants, as well as nonsense and missense variants: p.Met325HisfsTer128, p.Trp146Ter, p.Met325TrpfsTer6, p.Cys3TrpfsTer26, p.Arg493GlyfsTer22, p.Asp292AlafsTer38, p.Asp427GlyfsTer27, p.Gln686Ter, p.Glu616Lys, p.Leu585Pro [109,110,111,112,113]. The availability of NGS-based diagnostic approaches has enabled large cohort studies and longitudinal analyses, improving differential diagnosis, characterization of mutational spectra, and assessment of pulmonary fibrosis-related morbidity and mortality [114,115,116]. Advanced sequencing strategies have revealed pathogenic mechanisms that are difficult to detect using DNA-based approaches alone. While WGS can identify deep intronic variants, their impact on splicing is often uncertain, as they lie outside canonical splice sites and are not reliably predicted by in silico tools. RNA-seq allows direct evaluation of mRNA transcript structure and splicing alterations. In HPS1, this combined approach identified a deep intronic variant, c.1397+135C>T, which was not predicted to affect splicing but was shown by RNA-seq to activate a pseudoexon, leading to aberrant transcript inclusion and a premature termination codon. These findings underscore the value of RNA-seq in confirming the functional effects of noncoding variants that may remain unresolved by DNA-based analyses alone [117]. Such findings illustrate the importance of integrated genomic and transcriptomic approaches for identifying noncoding variants that disrupt gene expression. Recent studies further suggest that disease progression in HPS1 may involve inflammatory and immune-mediated mechanisms. A regulatory network associated with age-related neutrophil activation, characterized by increased inflammatory cytokines, neutrophil granule proteins, and enhanced neutrophil extracellular trap formation, has been linked to the development and progression of pulmonary fibrosis in individuals with pathogenic variants in HPS1 [118].
Because albinism can result from mutations in genes beyond those associated with HPS, differential diagnosis using NGS is essential [111]. In some reported cases, an initial clinical suspicion of HPS1-related disease was later revised following genetic testing that identified variants in other pigmentation genes. For instance, four hypomorphic variants in the tyrosinase gene (TYR) were detected in a patient initially suspected of having HPS1, leading to a final diagnosis of oculocutaneous albinism type 1B [119].

3.4.2. Pathogenic Variants in AP3B1

Pathogenic variants in AP3B1 cause HPS type 2 by disrupting the AP-3, which mediates the sorting of proteins destined for lysosomes and lysosome-related organelles (Figure 2). In addition to oculocutaneous albinism and platelet dense (δ)-granule deficiency, AP3B1 deficiency is distinguished by immunodeficiency, chronic neutropenia, platelet dysfunction, and ceroid deposition. The disorder therefore combines defects in pigmentation, hemostasis, and immune function. Clinical presentation associated with pathogenic variants in AP3B1 shows variable onset and expressivity. Reported manifestations range from neonatal interstitial lung disease to recurrent infections during childhood and periodontal inflammation in adolescence, reflecting impaired vesicular trafficking and granule formation in immune cells [120,121].
Multiple compound heterozygous variants have been reported in patients, including nonsense, frameshift, splice-site variants, and large deletions that lead to severe reduction or absence of AP-3 complex function (ClinVar_AP3B1). Examples include c.[177delA];[1839-1842delTAGA], p.[Gln255 Leu];[Glu19AspfsTer21], p.[Met63Lys];[Leu849Ter], p.[Phe375SerfsTer11];[p.Leu849Ter], and the compound heterozygotes c.205-1G>C and p.Asn4LysfsTer6 [120,121,122,123]. Functional studies confirmed that these variants disrupt lysosomal targeting and trafficking of granule proteins, providing a mechanistic explanation for the combined hematologic and immunologic phenotype. Several consanguineous multigenerational families have also been described carrying homozygous deletions, missense or truncating variants, including p.Val128Ala, p.Val640GlyfsTer29, p.Glu693fsTer13, p.Glu52fsTer11 [124,125].
Beyond classical HPS2, heterozygous variants in AP3B1 have also been associated with immune dysregulation. Germline variants in AP3B1 and UNC13D were reported to be enriched in patients with severe COVID-19-associated cytokine storm, suggesting that defects in cytotoxic granule trafficking pathways may contribute to hyperinflammatory responses [126]. Gao et al. described an adult patient with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) carrying heterozygous variants in both UNC13D (c.1232G>A) and AP3B1 (c.1075A>G), supporting a synergistic effect of double heterozygosity in genes involved in lymphocyte cytotoxicity and vesicle trafficking [127]. Similarly, Yin et al. reported a pediatric HLH case with heterozygous variants in AP3B1 (c.3197C>T) and ATM (c.8077G>T), presenting with severe cytokine storm, distributive shock, and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, further implicating AP3B1 as a contributor to digenic immune dysregulation [128].

3.4.3. Pathogenic Variants in HPS3

Pathogenic variants in HPS3, which encodes a component of the BLOC-2 complex, cause a relatively mild HPS subtype (HPS type 3) (Figure 2). Affected individuals typically show moderate hypopigmentation and a bleeding tendency, without the severe systemic complications, particularly pulmonary fibrosis, seen in other subtypes. The phenotype includes oculocutaneous albinism, reduced visual acuity, nystagmus (sometimes with compensatory head movements), and occasional gastrointestinal involvement such as enterocolitis. Immune dysfunction is not a consistent feature, further supporting the mild systemic nature of this subtype.
HPS3 is notable for the presence of recurrent founder variants in certain populations, contributing to increased prevalence in specific geographic and ancestral groups [129]. Expanded NGS studies have demonstrated that residual BLOC-2 activity correlates with reduced systemic manifestations, providing a mechanistic explanation for the milder phenotype observed in many affected individuals. However, recent reports describing gastrointestinal inflammation and inflammatory bowel disease-like features suggest broader phenotypic variability than previously recognized [130]. High-throughput sequencing approaches have identified a wide spectrum of pathogenic variants in HPS3, including missense, nonsense, frameshift, splice-site variants, and large deletions (ClinVar_HPS3). Recurrently reported variants include c.1163+1G>A, p.Pro22Arg, p.Cys398Tyr, p.Tyr922Ter, p.Arg822Ter, p.Gln3Ter, p.Asp411GlyfsTer32, p.Ser613Ter, p.Leu333Ter, p.Glu963Ter, and p.Leu533PhefsTer10 [112,129,131,132,133,134,135,136,137]. In addition, a 14,761-bp pathogenic deletion involving the 5′ untranslated region has been reported, further expanding the mutational landscape of HPS3 [135]. The persistence of HPS3 founder variants (like p.Ser613Ter in the Chinese population, and c.1163+1G>A, c.2621-2A>G, c.1831+2T>G in the Ashkenazi Jewish population) underscores the role of population history in shaping the distribution of rare disease alleles, and highlights the importance of ancestry-informed NGS diagnostics and community-engaged genomic medicine [135,138].

3.4.4. Pathogenic Variants in HPS4

Pathogenic variants in HPS4, which encodes the second subunit of the BLOC-3 complex, cause a clinical phenotype that is largely indistinguishable from HPS1-related disease (Figure 2). Individuals affected with HPS type 4 typically present with oculocutaneous albinism, platelet dense granule deficiency, and a high risk of progressive pulmonary fibrosis and granulomatous colitis. Early mutation studies identified truncating and missense variants in diverse populations, establishing HPS4 as a major non-Puerto Rican cause of severe Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome [139]. Functional analyses demonstrated that the integrity of the BLOC-3 complex is essential for late endosomal trafficking and lysosome-related organelle biogenesis. Multiple patients have been reported carrying homozygous pathogenic variants in HPS4 (in familial cases) that result in frameshift, nonsense, splice-site, or missense alterations (ClinVar_HPS4). Reported variants include p.Pro685LeufsTer17, p.Val394Pro395fsTer23, p.Ser280ProfsTer34, c.1713+1delG, p.Leu91Pro, p.Ala211fsTer, and p.Trp139Ter [112,131,134,137,140,141]. These variants disrupt BLOC-3 complex stability and impair vesicular trafficking pathways required for proper maturation of lysosome-related organelles.
Recent genomic and transcriptomic studies have also identified HPS4 as a lysosome-related gene with potential biomarker value. Experimental knockdown of HPS4 in liver cancer cell models suppressed tumor cell proliferation and induced apoptosis. Prognostic prediction models incorporating HPS4 expression further highlighted its potential value as a biomarker and therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma [142]. These findings suggest that regulation of HPS4 may provide novel strategies for precision treatment in liver cancer, and further investigation of HPS4-associated pathways may also provide insights into lysosome-related mechanisms in non-germline disease contexts.

3.4.5. Pathogenic Variants in HPS5

Pathogenic variants in HPS5, which encodes a subunit of the BLOC-2 complex, cause HPS type 5 (Figure 2). HPS5 associates with HPS3 as part of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex-2 (BLOC-2), which is required for trafficking processes involved in lysosome-related organelle formation. Identified pathogenic variants include missense and truncating alleles that lead to partial destabilization of the BLOC-2 complex (Figure 2). Clinical series and case reports indicate a low incidence of pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications as compared with BLOC-3-related disease, and many patients present with mild hypopigmentation and bleeding tendency without additional major complications [143]. Reported variants include homozygous p.Val254Phe and compound heterozygous variants, such as p.[Glu634Ter];[Trp246Ter] and p.[Gly50Asp];[Cys360Arg] (ClinVar_HPS5) [133,144]. In some cases, patients exhibit mild bleeding symptoms that do not substantially affect quality of life and maintain a normal life span. For example, individual carrying the homozygous p.Lys654Ter variant who was diagnosed with platelet dense granule storage pool deficiency (DG-SPD) at the age of 38 years, after presenting with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage [145]. During the subsequent two decades of follow-up the patient did not develop severe bleeding, pulmonary or gastrointestinal complications.
Complex genetic findings have also been described. A combination of a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance in HPS5 (p.Tyr956His) together with a homozygous nonsense variant (p.Arg47Ter) in the HPS6 gene was reported in a 24-year-old patient with renal failure and an atypical HPS presentation, suggesting potential interactions between components of the BLOC-2 complex and interconnected molecular mechanisms [146].

3.4.6. Pathogenic Variants in HPS6

Pathogenic variants in HPS6, another BLOC-2 component, result in HPS type 6, with a phenotype similar to HPS type 5. HPS6 is required for proper trafficking to lysosome-related organelles, particularly melanosomes and platelet dense granules (Figure 2). Functional studies demonstrate defective melanosome maturation and impaired platelet dense granule formation, underlying the characteristic hypopigmentation and bleeding diathesis. While lysosome-related organelles such as Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs) in endothelial cells share related biogenesis pathways, the specific role of HPS6 in their maturation remains less well defined. Additionally, HPS6 is likely to be involved in the maturation of WPB, which is one of the LROs in endothelial cells, whose primary cargo is von Willebrand factor (vWF) [104]. HPS6 deficiency has been reported to result in misshapen, immature WPBs and reduced storage of vWF, impairing primary hemostasis and contributing to bleeding disorders.
Pathogenic HPS6 variants classified as PVS1 (ACMG criteria [10,146]) are typically loss-of-function alleles, including p.Arg667Ter, p.Trp112Ter, p.Arg578Ter, p.Gln341Ter, p.Gly382GlyfsTer13, p.Asn559fsTer, p.Asn559GlnfsTer8, p.Gly519ValfsTer1, and p.Leu22ArgfsTer33 [109,133,134,147,148]. Some variants have been observed in a double homozygous state, such as c.1789delG, p.Ser379Ter, and p.Ala597GlnfsTer16, in members of consanguineous families presenting with severe oculocutaneous albinism [149]. Recently, novel homozygous missense variants in HPS6 (p.Val128Ala, p.Ala81Ser, p.Leu378Arg) were reported to markedly reduce HPS6 mRNA or protein expression (ClinVar_HPS6). These variants correlated with the absence of platelet δ-granules on whole-mount electron microscopy, confirming a significant platelet storage pool defect despite a clinically mild HPS phenotype [117,150].
A very rare and unusual case combining hemophilia B and HPS6 was reported, demonstrating the absence of platelet δ-granules on electron microscopy, oculocutaneous albinism, abnormal secondary wave in platelet aggregation studies, and a homozygous p.Arg372Ter variant [151]. This case highlights the potential for atypical presentations and overlapping hematologic disorders in patients with HPS6 pathogenic variants.

3.4.7. Pathogenic Variants in DTNBP1

Pathogenic variants in DTNBP1 (also known as BLOC1S8, OMIM: 607145), which encodes the protein dysbindin, a component of the BLOC-1 complex, cause HPS type 7 (Figure 2). This subtype is extremely rare and remains poorly characterized due to the limited number of reported cases. Affected individuals typically present with oculocutaneous albinism and bleeding diathesis. Reported pathogenic variants include frameshift and nonsense alleles that result in complete loss of dysbindin expression, often associated with an early-onset inflammatory bowel disease [152]. NGS studies have confirmed these variants, with the nonsense variant p.Gln103Ter in DTNBP1 being the one of the most frequently reported [134,152,153]. A complex homozygous deletion of exon 6 in DTNBP1 c.(355+1_356-1)_(488+1_489-1)del resulted in complete loss of dysbindin expression and additional phenotypic features, including recurrent bacterial infections and reduced natural killer (NK) cell degranulation [144]. To date, over 30 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in DTNBP1 have been reported in ClinVar (DTNBP1_ClinVar). The rarity of these cases underscores the ultra-rare status of HPS7 and highlights the need for continued genomic studies to define the full spectrum of clinical and molecular features associated with this subtype.

3.4.8. Pathogenic Variants in BLOC1S3

Pathogenic variants in BLOC1S3 cause HPS type 8 (HPS8) by disrupting a subunit of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 (BLOC-1) (Figure 2). Reported patients exhibit classic HPS features of moderate severity. At least four consanguineous families with HPS8 have been described, each carrying distinct homozygous pathogenic variants in BLOC1S3, including c.385_403del, c.338_341del, c.444_467del, and p.Gln150ArgfsTer75. Affected individuals consistently present with moderate oculocutaneous albinism and bleeding diathesis. Additional ocular manifestations reported include nystagmus, iris transillumination, foveal hypoplasia, reduced visual acuity, and evidence of optic pathway misrouting [154,155]. Rare additional complications have also been described. For example, one reported patient with HPS8 developed lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma [155].
Aside from these cases, very limited information is available regarding the pathogenicity of variants in BLOC1S3. In ClinVar, only four pathogenic variants have been submitted in association with HPS8, including p.Gln150_Ala157del, p.Ser129fs, p.Leu113fs, and p.Ser44fs, and BLOC1S3 has also been reported within large multigenic copy number gains on chromosome 19q (ClinVar_BLOC1S3).

3.4.9. Pathogenic Variants in BLOC1S6

Pathogenic variants in BLOC1S6 (also known as PLDN) were initially identified through candidate gene sequencing and functional studies demonstrating impaired BLOC-1 complex stability (Figure 2). Individuals with HPS type 9 (HPS9) present with oculocutaneous albinism and platelet dense granule deficiency. The rarity of reported cases suggests that the condition is underdiagnosed; this limitation is increasingly addressed through NGS-based gene panels, WES, and WGS (ClinVar_BLOC1S6). Novel compound heterozygous variants have been reported, including p.[Glu50Ter];[Ile118TyrfsTer10] and p.[Ser67Ter];[Glu107Met], identified by whole-exome sequencing [156,157]. Homozygous variants are predominantly observed in consanguineous families, such as a deletion of exon 1 in BLOC1S6, p.His96LeufsTer22, and c.224+1G>A [117,158,159].
A number of common heterozygous variants in BLOC1S6 have been reported in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and appear to modulate melanin levels and pigmentation in various populations. These variants may contribute to pigmentation differences in the general population without necessarily causing HPS [160].

3.4.10. Pathogenic Variants in AP3D1

Pathogenic variants in AP3D1, which encodes the δ subunit of the AP-3 complex, cause HPS type 10 (HPS10) (Figure 2), a syndromic form characterized by oculocutaneous albinism, bleeding diathesis, immunodeficiency, increased susceptibility to infection, neutropenia, seizures, and severe neurodevelopmental delay [161]. Homozygous truncating variants have been reported, with functional studies demonstrating global AP-3 dysfunction affecting both neuronal and immune pathways (ClinVar_AP3D1). Examples of such pathogenic variants include p.Val1189LeufsTer8, c.1859+1G>T, and p.Ala660ArgfsTer54 [162,163,164]. In addition, homozygous pathogenic missense variants, such as p.Val711Ile and p.Val1064Ile, segregate with severe phenotypes including sensorineural hearing loss, early-onset epilepsy, and early childhood mortality, suggesting that these residues may reside within functionally critical domains of AP3D1 protein [165,166].
Animal models, including zebrafish (Danio rerio) and murine model of HPS10, have been recently developed to study AP3D1 function and the molecular pathogenesis of this rare disease, providing platforms for mechanistic and therapeutic studies [167,168].
Aside from its role in HPS10, AP3D1 has been implicated in the regulation of interferon-γ and MHC-I signaling in cancer-related contexts. Specifically, AP3D1 facilitates the lysosomal trafficking of IFNGR1, promoting its degradation. Under normal conditions, optineurin interacts with AP3D1 and restrains this process. However, loss of optineurin in cancer enhances AP3D1-mediated lysosomal sorting of IFNGR1 and has been associated with reduced antitumor T-cell responses and resistance to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer [169]. Additionally, AP-3 complex subunit δ has been identified as an atherosclerosis-associated antigen, with elevated anti-AP3D1 serum IgG levels correlating with increased risk of acute ischemic stroke, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. These findings suggest its potential utility as a biomarker for atherosclerotic disease progression and stroke risk [170].

3.4.11. Pathogenic Variants in BLOC1S5

Pathogenic variants in BLOC1S5 (formerly known as Muted) were formally recognized as a distinct HPS type (HPS11) following NGS-based discovery (ClinVar_BLOC1S5). BLOC1S5 encodes the muted subunit of the obligate multisubunit BLOC-1 complex (Figure 2). Variants in this gene disrupt BLOC-1 assembly, leading to defective biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles. Reported patients present with typical HPS features, including oculocutaneous albinism and platelet dense granule deficiency, but without consistent pulmonary involvement [171].
Pennamen et al. screened 230 unresolved HPS patients using NGS and identified a deletion encompassing exon 3 of BLOC1S5 (c.196-678_384+3483del) in one patient, and a homozygous p.Val116SerfsTer19 variant in another, thereby ending the diagnostic odyssey and establishing the molecular diagnosis of HPS11 in both cases [171]. Newly identified homozygous variants in BLOC1S5, including c.113-1G>A and p.Val61Ter, were associated with severely impaired platelet δ-granule secretion, as indicated by reduced CD63 expression [172,173].
In addition, a novel IRF4-BLOC1S5 fusion gene was reported in a patient with TEMPI syndrome (telangiectasias, elevated erythropoietin and erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections, and intrapulmonary shunting), raising the possibility of a digenic contribution and further expanding the spectrum of multisystem phenotypes associated with this rare disorder [174].
In summary, HPS spectrum disorders are defined by defects in lysosome-related organelle biogenesis, with hallmark features of oculocutaneous albinism, bleeding diathesis, and variable systemic involvement. Clinical presentation and severity are highly heterogeneous, reflecting differences in the affected gene, variant type, and molecular complex. Currently, no curative therapy exists for HPS, and clinical care remains supportive, focusing on symptom-directed management. This includes prevention and treatment of complications such as bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, and pulmonary fibrosis (including lung transplantation) [175]. Ongoing research into vesicle trafficking and lysosome-related organelle biology continues to inform potential future therapeutic strategies, including gene- and molecular pathway-targeted approaches. Carrier screening in at-risk populations should be considered to prevent these debilitating disorders.
The continued application of NGS is expected to identify additional genes and pathogenic variants in HPS and related LRO disorders. Of particular interest are genes shared between early- and late- endosomal/lysosomal biogenesis, such as BLOC1S1 (OMIM: 601444), BLOC1S2 (OMIM: 609768), and BLOC1S4 (OMIM: 605695), where new genotype–phenotype correlations in humans may emerge. However, some shared subunits, such as SNAPIN (also known as BLOC1S7, OMIM: 607007), have been associated with autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorders with structural brain and craniofacial abnormalities (OMIM: 621393), and more resemble a BORC-complex phenotype rather than classical HPS. Additionally, CD63 (TSPAN30; OMIM: 155740), although not yet assigned an official HPS subtype, represents a candidate gene for emerging lysosome-related organelle disorders.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

NGS-enabled clinical, carrier, and newborn screening have begun to incorporate molecular confirmation for selected lysosomal storage and transport disorders, highlighting the emerging role of genomics in population-level early detection [138]. Genomic testing expands diagnostic and screening opportunities but also identifies variants of uncertain significance. Strategies to mitigate the potential challenges of VUS include testing protocols that limit their identification or reporting, subclassifying VUS according to predicted pathogenicity, routine family-based variant evaluation, and enhanced genetic counseling [176].
Artificial intelligence is increasingly applied to comprehensive genome interpretation, enabling nomination of candidate diagnoses for rare genetic diseases. Analysis of previously unsolved cases using AI has led to novel findings that have resolved diagnostic odysseys [177]. Several commercial and academic genomic laboratories now offer periodic genome re-evaluation using AI-driven data mining to identify novel causative variants, further enhancing the diagnostic yield for rare lysosomal disorders.

Author Contributions

I.V.-S.L.: conceptualized manuscript content, wrote the original draft, and S.K. reviewed and edited the manuscript submissions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This study is a review of previously published literature. No new datasets were generated or analyzed. All data supporting the findings are available in the 177 cited references.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Irina Vlasova-St. Louis was employed by the company Vinnana AI LLC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ACMGAmerican College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
AMRFAction myoclonus-renal failure syndrome
AP3B1Adaptor-related protein complex 3 subunit beta 1
AP-3Adaptor protein complex
AP3D1Adaptor-related protein complex 3 subunit delta 1
BLOC-1Biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1
BLOC1S3Biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 3
BLOC-2Biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 2
BLOC-3Biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 3
BORCBLOC-one-related complex
BLOC1S6Biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 6
BLOC1S5Biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5
CD63Cluster of differentiation 63
CTNSCystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter
DTNBP1Dystrobrevin binding protein 1
GNPTABN-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase subunits alpha and beta
GNPTGN-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase subunit gamma
GlcNAc-1-PTaseN-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase
GBAβ-glucocerebrosidase
GCaseβ-glucocerebrosidase
HPSHermansky–Pudlak Syndrome
HPS1HPS1 biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 3 subunit 1
HPS2Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome type 2
HPS3Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome type 3
HPS4Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome type 4
HPS5Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome type 5
HPS6Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome type 6
HPS7Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome type 7
HPS8Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome type 8
IFSDInfantile free sialic acid storage disease
IRF4Interferon regulatory factor 4
LSDsLysosomal storage diseases
LROsLysosome-related organelles
LDsLysosomal diseases
LIMP2Lysosomal integral membrane protein type 2
MLMucolipidoses
MCOLN1Mucolipin-1
M6pMannose-6-phosphate
NGSNext-generation sequencing
NEU1Neuraminidase 1
Neu5AcN-acetylneuraminic acid
NKNatural killer
RUSPRecommended Uniform Screening Panel
RNA-seqRibonucleic acid sequencing
SCARB2Scavenger Receptor Class B Member 2
SASDSialic Acid Storage Disease
SLC17A5Solute Carrier Family 17 Member 5
TEMPITelangiectasias, elevated erythropoietin and erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections, and intrapulmonary shunting
TREM2Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells 2
TRPML1mucolipin-1 protein
TYRTyrosinase gene
WESWhole-exome sequencing
WGSWhole-genome sequencing

References

  1. Vlasova-St. Louis, I. Introductory Chapter: Advances in Prenatal and Neonatal Diagnostics. In Selected Topics in Prenatal and Neonatal Diagnoses; Amarin, Z., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2025; pp. 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang, S.; Zhan, X.; Liu, Y.; Song, H.; Gong, Z.; Han, L.; Maegawa, G.H.B.; Gu, X.; Zhang, H. Newborn Screening for 6 Lysosomal Storage Disorders in China. JAMA Netw. Open 2024, 7, e2410754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Vlasova-St. Louis, I.; Barak, U.; Khaiboullina, S. Perspective Chapter: Next-Generation Sequencing and Variant Cataloging for Screening and Diagnosis of Sphingolipidoses and Mucopolysaccharidoses. In Selected Topics in Prenatal and Neonatal Diagnoses; Amarin, Z., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2025; pp. 47–101. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ding, S.; Han, L. Newborn screening for genetic disorders: Current status and prospects for the future. Pediatr. Investig. 2022, 6, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. La Cognata, V.; Cavallaro, S. A Comprehensive, Targeted NGS Approach to Assessing Molecular Diagnosis of Lysosomal Storage Diseases. Genes 2021, 12, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Akter, H.; Hossain, M.S.; Dity, N.J.; Rahaman, M.A.; Furkan Uddin, K.M.; Nassir, N.; Begum, G.; Hameid, R.A.; Islam, M.S.; Tusty, T.A.; et al. Whole exome sequencing uncovered highly penetrant recessive mutations for a spectrum of rare genetic pediatric diseases in Bangladesh. npj Genom. Med. 2021, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Engel, A.; Summer, R.; Roman, J. Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome in the United States. Chest 2025, 168, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Sakai, E.; Yamada, T.; Hamazaki, T.; Tajima, G.; Seto, T. A Nationwide Survey Investigating the Current Status of Genetic Counseling in Newborn Screening in Japan. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. La Cognata, V.; Cavallaro, S. Detection of Structural Variants by NGS: Revealing Missing Alleles in Lysosomal Storage Diseases. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Platt, F.M.; d’Azzo, A.; Davidson, B.L.; Neufeld, E.F.; Tifft, C.J. Lysosomal storage diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Xu, H.; Ren, D. Lysosomal Physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2015, 77, 57–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Franceschetti, S.; Canafoglia, L. Sialidoses. Epileptic Disord. 2016, 18, S89–S93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Alegra, T.; Sperb-Ludwig, F.; Guarany, N.R.; Ribeiro, E.M.; Lourenço, C.M.; Kim, C.A.; Valadares, E.R.; Galera, M.F.; Acosta, A.X.; Horovitz, D.D.G.; et al. Clinical Characterization of Mucolipidoses II and III: A Multicenter Study. J. Pediatr. Genet. 2019, 8, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Jezela-Stanek, A.; Ciara, E.; Stepien, K.M. Neuropathophysiology, Genetic Profile, and Clinical Manifestation of Mucolipidosis IV—A Review and Case Series. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Dogterom, E.J.; Wagenmakers, M.A.E.M.; Wilke, M.; Demirdas, S.; Muschol, N.M.; Pohl, S.; Meijden, J.C.v.d.; Rizopoulos, D.; Ploeg, A.T.v.d.; Oussoren, E. Mucolipidosis type II and type III: A systematic review of 843 published cases. Genet. Med. 2021, 23, 2047–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Bonten, E.J.; Annunziata, I.; d’Azzo, A. Lysosomal multienzyme complex: Pros and cons of working together. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 2017–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Fremuth, L.E.; Hu, H.; van de Vlekkert, D.; Annunziata, I.; Weesner, J.A.; d’Azzo, A. Neuraminidase 1 regulates neuropathogenesis by governing the cellular state of microglia via modulation of Trem2 sialylation. Cell Rep. 2025, 44, 115204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Cao, L.; Liu, Y.; Song, Z.; Zhang, B.; Long, W.; Zhao, G. Compound heterozygous mutations in the neuraminidase 1 gene in type 1 sialidosis: A case report and review of literature. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Mohammad, A.N.; Bruno, K.A.; Hines, S.; Atwal, P.S. Type 1 sialidosis presenting with ataxia, seizures and myoclonus with no visual involvement. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2018, 15, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Arora, V.; Setia, N.; Dalal, A.; Vanaja, M.C.; Gupta, D.; Razdan, T.; Phadke, S.R.; Saxena, R.; Rohtagi, A.; Verma, I.C.; et al. Sialidosis type II: Expansion of phenotypic spectrum and identification of a common mutation in seven patients. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2020, 22, 100561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Caciotti, A.; Melani, F.; Tonin, R.; Cellai, L.; Catarzi, S.; Procopio, E.; Chilleri, C.; Mavridou, I.; Michelakakis, H.; Fioravanti, A.; et al. Type I sialidosis, a normosomatic lysosomal disease, in the differential diagnosis of late-onset ataxia and myoclonus: An overview. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2020, 129, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, R.; Ao, R.; Xiang, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Yu, S. Clinical and Structural Characteristics of NEU1 Variants Causing Sialidosis Type 1. J. Mov. Disord. 2024, 17, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Du, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, Q.; Ma, Y.; Dong, Y.; Wu, Z. Genotype-phenotype correlation and founder effect analysis in southeast Chinese patients with sialidosis type I. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2024, 19, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Mütze, U.; Bürger, F.; Hoffmann, J.; Tegetmeyer, H.; Heichel, J.; Nickel, P.; Lemke, J.R.; Syrbe, S.; Beblo, S. Multigene panel next generation sequencing in a patient with cherry red macular spot: Identification of two novel mutations in NEU1 gene causing sialidosis type I associated with mild to unspecific biochemical and enzymatic findings. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2017, 10, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Kılıç, M.; İcil, S.; Sezer, A.; Kaya-Güneş, Ö.; Comoğlu, S.S. Sialidosis type 1 in a Turkish family: A case report and review of literatures. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 38, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Sahoo, L.K.; Kota, V.; Panigrahi, P.K.; Pattnaik, S.; Mishra, A.P.; Sahoo, S.K. Novel Pathogenic Variant in the NEU1 Gene in a Patient with Sialidosis with Progressive Myoclonus Ataxia with Cherry-Red Spot. Neurology 2023, 101, 861–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Neeraja, K.; Holla, V.V.; Prasad, S.; Surisetti, B.K.; Rakesh, K.; Kamble, N.; Yadav, R.; Pal, P.K. Sialidosis Type I without a Cherry Red Spot—Is There a Genetic Basis? J. Mov. Disord. 2021, 14, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Han, X.; Wu, S.; Wang, M.; Li, H.; Huang, Y.; Sui, R. Genetic and clinical characterization of mainland Chinese patients with sialidosis type 1. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2020, 8, e1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Hassan, M.; Alharbi, M.A.; Alhassani, R.Y.; Hussain, A.A.; Kamfar, R.Y. A Case of Type 2 Sialidosis with Deletion of a Single Nucleotide at Position c.947 of the Neuraminidase 1 (NEU1) Gene. Cureus 2021, 13, e20389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Peng, M.; Chau, S.; Chien, J.; Woon, P.; Chen, Y.; Cheang, W.; Tsai, H.; Huang, S. Genetic Insights and Clinical Implications of NEU1 Mutations in Sialidosis. Genes 2025, 16, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Khan, S.A.; Tomatsu, S.C. Mucolipidoses Overview: Past, Present, and Future. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Monteagudo-Vilavedra, E.; Rodrigues, D.; Vella, G.; Bravo, S.B.; Pena, C.; Lopez-Valverde, L.; Colon, C.; Sanchez-Pintos, P.; Otero Espinar, F.J.; Couce, M.L.; et al. Novel Phenotypical and Biochemical Findings in Mucolipidosis Type II. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Ammer, L.S.; Täuber, K.; Perez, A.; Dohrmann, T.; Denecke, J.; Santer, R.; Blümlein, U.; Ozga, A.; Pohl, S.; Muschol, N.M. CNS Manifestations in Mucolipidosis Type II-A Retrospective Analysis of Longitudinal Data on Neurocognitive Development and Neuroimaging in Eleven Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Velho, R.V.; Harms, F.L.; Danyukova, T.; Ludwig, N.F.; Friez, M.J.; Cathey, S.S.; Filocamo, M.; Tappino, B.; Güneş, N.; Tüysüz, B.; et al. The lysosomal storage disorders mucolipidosis type II, type III alpha/beta, and type III gamma: Update on GNPTAB and GNPTG mutations. Hum. Mutat. 2019, 40, 842–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Paik, K.H.; Song, S.M.; Ki, C.S.; Yu, H.; Kim, J.S.; Min, K.H.; Chang, S.H.; Yoo, E.J.; Lee, I.J.; Kwan, E.K.; et al. Identification of mutations in the GNPTA (MGC4170) gene coding for GlcNAc-phosphotransferase α/β subunits in Korean patients with mucolipidosis type II or type IIIA. Hum. Mutat. 2005, 26, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. He, S.; Li, D.; Lv, W.; Tang, W.; Sun, S.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J.; Lu, X. Outcomes after HSCT for mucolipidosis II (I-cell disease) caused by novel compound heterozygous GNPTAB mutations. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1199489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Essawi, M.L.; Fateen, E.M.; Atia, H.A.; Eissa, N.R.; Aboul-Ezz, E.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Hassan, H.A. Quaternary diagnostics scheme for mucolipidosis II and detection of novel mutation in GNPTAB gene. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Feng, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Sheng, H.; Su, X.; Yin, X.; Li, L.; Zhang, W. Clinical and molecular characteristics of 20 Chinese probands with Mucolipidosis type II and III alpha/beta. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 24, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Mao, S.; Zu, Y.; Dai, Y.; Zou, C. Case Report: Mucolipidosis II and III Alpha/Beta Caused by Pathogenic Variants in the GNPTAB Gene (Mucolipidosis). Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 852701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Liu, S.; Zhang, W.; Shi, H.; Yao, F.; Wei, M.; Qiu, Z. Mutation Analysis of 16 Mucolipidosis II and III Alpha/Beta Chinese Children Revealed Genotype-Phenotype Correlations. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Erdem, F.; Canda, E.; Yazıcı, H.; Eser, R.; Yoldaş Çelik, M.; Keşan, S.; Saka Güvenç, M.; Atik, T.; Tamsel, İ.; Onay, H.; et al. Mucolipidosis type II and III: Clinical spectrum, genetic landscape, and longitudinal outcomes in a pediatric cohort with six novel mutations. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 38, 1286–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Ammer, L.S.; Oussoren, E.; Muschol, N.M.; Pohl, S.; Rubio-Gozalbo, M.; Santer, R.; Stuecker, R.; Vettorazzi, E.; Breyer, S.R. Hip Morphology in Mucolipidosis Type II. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Pekgül, F.; Eroğlu-Ertuğrul, N.G.; Bekircan-Kurt, C.; Erdem-Ozdamar, S.; Çetinkaya, A.; Tan, E.; Konuşkan, B.; Karaağaoğlu, E.; Topçu, M.; Akarsu, N.A.; et al. Comprehensive clinical, biochemical, radiological and genetic analysis of 28 Turkish cases with suspected metachromatic leukodystrophy and their relatives. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2020, 25, 100688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Moutinho, M.E.; Gonçalves, M.; Duarte, A.J.; Encarnação, M.; Coutinho, M.F.; Matos, L.; Santos, J.I.; Ribeiro, D.; Amaral, O.; Gaspar, P.; et al. Establishment of a Human iPSC Line from Mucolipidosis Type II That Expresses the Key Markers of the Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Leroy, J.G.; Sillence, D.; Wood, T.; Barnes, J.; Lebel, R.R.; Friez, M.J.; Stevenson, R.E.; Steet, R.; Cathey, S.S. A novel intermediate mucolipidosis II/IIIαβ caused by GNPTAB mutation in the cytosolic N-terminal domain. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 22, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Khan, M.A.; Zubaida, B.; Karim, N.; Cheema, H.A.; Naeem, M. Identification of two novel variants in GNPTAB underlying mucolipidosis II in a Pakistani family. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 33, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Lee, W.; Jennings, B.C.; Doray, B.; Kornfeld, S. Disease-causing missense mutations within the N-terminal transmembrane domain of GlcNAc-1-phosphotransferase impair endoplasmic reticulum translocation or Golgi retention. Hum. Mutat. 2020, 41, 1321–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Yang, J.; Liu, C.; Geng, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Wu, W. Two GNPTAB Variations Caused Mucolipidosis II Alpha/Beta in a Chinese Family. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2025, 44, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Ludwig, N.F.; Velho, R.V.; Sperb-Ludwig, F.; Acosta, A.X.; Ribeiro, E.M.; Kim, C.A.; Gandelman Horovitz, D.D.; Boy, R.; Rodovalho-Doriqui, M.; Lourenço, C.M.; et al. GNPTAB missense mutations cause loss of GlcNAc-1-phosphotransferase activity in mucolipidosis type II through distinct mechanisms. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2017, 92, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Speer, R.R.; Ezeanya, U.C.; Beaudoin, S.J.; Glass, K.M.; Oji-Mmuo, C. Term Neonate Presenting with the Combined Occurrence of Mucolipidosis Type II and Leigh Syndrome. J. Pediatr. Genet. 2020, 9, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. La Rosa, A.; Pepe, A.; Tappino, B.; Corsolini, F.; Chiaro, A.; Madeo, A. Hand stiffness not only a rheumatological sign: A case of early onset mucolipidosis III-gamma with literature review. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2025, 44, 101246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Di Lorenzo, G.; Westermann, L.M.; Yorgan, T.A.; Stürznickel, J.; Ludwig, N.F.; Ammer, L.S.; Baranowsky, A.; Ahmadi, S.; Pourbarkhordariesfandabadi, E.; Breyer, S.R.; et al. Pathogenic variants in GNPTAB and GNPTG encoding distinct subunits of GlcNAc-1-phosphotransferase differentially impact bone resorption in patients with mucolipidosis type II and III. Genet. Med. 2021, 23, 2369–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Kudo, M.; Brem, M.S.; Canfield, W.M. Mucolipidosis II (I-Cell Disease) and Mucolipidosis IIIA (Classical Pseudo-Hurler Polydystrophy) Are Caused by Mutations in the GlcNAc-Phosphotransferase α/β–Subunits Precursor Gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 78, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Hong, X.; Pollard, L.; He, M.; Gelb, M.H.; Wood, T.C. Multiplex tandem mass spectrometry enzymatic activity assay for the screening and diagnosis of Mucolipidosis type II and III. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2023, 35, 100978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Miller, A.; Schafer, J.; Upchurch, C.; Spooner, E.; Huynh, J.; Hernandez, S.; McLaughlin, B.; Oden, L.; Fares, H. Mucolipidosis Type IV Protein TRPML1-Dependent Lysosome Formation. Traffic 2015, 16, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Wahl-Schott, C.; Freichel, M.; Hennis, K.; Philippaert, K.; Ottenheijm, R.; Tsvilovskyy, V.; Varbanov, H.; Wahl-Schott, C.; Biel, M. Characterization of Endo-Lysosomal Cation Channels Using Calcium Imaging; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 277–304. [Google Scholar]
  58. Boudewyn, L.C.; Walkley, S.U. Current concepts in the neuropathogenesis of mucolipidosis type IV. J. Neurochem. 2019, 148, 669–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Bargal, R.; Avidan, N.; Olender, T.; Ben Asher, E.; Zeigler, M.; Raas-Rothschild, A.; Frumkin, A.; Ben-Yoseph, O.; Friedlender, Y.; Lancet, D.; et al. Mucolipidosis type IV: Novel MCOLN1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish patients and the frequency of the disease in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Hum. Mutat. 2001, 17, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Al-Alawi, B.; Harikrishna, B.; Al-Thihli, K.; Al Zuhabi, S.; Ganesh, A.; Al Hashami, Z.; Al Dhamhmani, Z.; Zadjali, R.; Al Riyami, N.B.; Zadjali, F. Mucolipidosis Type IV in Omani Families with a Novel MCOLN1 Mutation: Search for Evidence of Founder Effect. Genes 2022, 13, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Meloche, J.; Brunet, V.; Gagnon, P.; Lavoie, M.; Bouchard, J.; Nadaf, J.; Majewski, J.; Morin, C.; Laprise, C. Exome sequencing study of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum in men with developmental delay, epilepsy, and microcephaly. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2020, 8, e992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Mohsenipour, M.; Nejati, P.; Khosravi, T.; Alimoradi, E.; Salehi, M.; Oladnabi, M.; Alibakhshi, R. A novel Bi-Allelic pathogenic MCOLN1 variant underlying mucolipidosis type IV in an Iranian family: Clinical, genetic, and molecular dynamics-based structural analysis. BMC Med. Genom. 2025, 18, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Ghasemi, A.; Eslami Ardakani, M.; Togha, M.; Yazdi, N.; Lang, A.E.; Amini, E.; Rohani, M.; Alavi, A. A Novel Homozygous Variant in the MCOLN1 Gene Associated with Severe Oromandibular Dystonia and Parkinsonism. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2025, 52, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Patterson, K.; Chong, J.X.; Chung, D.D.; Lisch, W.; Karp, C.L.; Dreisler, E.; Lockington, D.; Rohrbach, J.M.; Garczarczyk-Asim, D.; Müller, T.; et al. Lisch Epithelial Corneal Dystrophy Is Caused by Heterozygous Loss-of-Function Variants in MCOLN1. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2024, 258, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Snyder, B.; Bailey, R.M. Toward a translational gene therapy for mucolipidosis IV. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2024, 32, 101345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Misko, A.L.; Wood, L.B.; DeBono, M.; Oberman, R.; Raas-Rothschild, A.; Grishchuk, Y.; Eichler, F. Cross-sectional Observations on the Natural History of Mucolipidosis Type IV. Neurol. Genet. 2022, 8, e662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Barral, D.C.; Delevoye, C.; Larue, L.; Seabra, M.C.; Raposo, G.; Setty, S.R.G. Insights into lysosome-related organelle biogenesis: Melanosome as a model organelle. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2026, 13, 1758081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Yang, C.; Wang, X. Lysosome biogenesis: Regulation and functions. J. Cell Biol. 2021, 220, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. del Castillo, F.J.; Muñoz, G.; García-Seisdedos, D.; Sánchez-Herranz, A.; Morado, M.; Valles, A.; Piris, M.; Martín-Moro, F.; Sanz-Rupérez, A.; López-Jiménez, J.; et al. Fast genetic diagnosis of lysosomal disorders by means of a novel NGS-based resequencing gene panel. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2018, 123, S38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Jamalpoor, A.; Othman, A.; Levtchenko, E.N.; Masereeuw, R.; Janssen, M.J. Molecular Mechanisms and Treatment Options of Nephropathic Cystinosis. Trends Mol. Med. 2021, 27, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Hohenfellner, K.; Elenberg, E.; Ariceta, G.; Nesterova, G.; Soliman, N.A.; Topaloglu, R. Newborn Screening: Review of its Impact for Cystinosis. Cells 2022, 11, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Fleige, T.; Burggraf, S.; Czibere, L.; Häring, J.; Glück, B.; Keitel, L.M.; Landt, O.; Harms, E.; Hohenfellner, K.; Durner, J.; et al. Next generation sequencing as second-tier test in high-throughput newborn screening for nephropathic cystinosis. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 2020, 28, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. El Younsi, M.; Trabelsi, M.; Ben Youssef, S.; Ouertani, I.; Hammi, Y.; Achour, A.; Maazoul, F.; Kharrat, M.; Gargah, T.; M’rad, R. Clinical and genetic characteristics of Tunisian children with infantile nephropathic cystinosis. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2023, 38, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Heroor, A.; Verma, A.; Achanta, D.S.; Edward, D.P.; Ramappa, M. Unveiling cystinosis in India. J. Rare Dis. 2024, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Dev, V.; Bhatt, G.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Malik, S.; Kumar, A.; Maheshwari, M.; Dhingra, B.; Sharma, T.; Pakhare, A.; Kumar, A.; et al. WCN25-2709 Mutational Spectrum of CTNS Gene in Indian Children with Nephropathic Cystinosis. Kidney Int. Rep. 2025, 10, S358–S359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Anastasiya, K.A.; Elena, O.G.; Natalia, B.V.; Anna, K.Y.; Kirill, T.Y.; Olesya, K.I.; Tatiana, N.A.; Inessa, F.D.; Ekaterina, S.I.; Peter, S.A.; et al. Atypical onset of nephropathic infantile cystinosis in a Russian patient with rare CTNS mutation. Clin. Case Rep. 2018, 6, 1871–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Gholami Yarahmadi, S.; Sarlaki, F.; Morovvati, S. Cystinosis and two rare mutations in CTNS gene: Two case reports. J. Med. Case Rep. 2022, 16, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Lee, H.; Lau, N.; Yeung, C.; Ng, S.; Yau, K.; Mak, C. Successful Adaptation of Targeted Gene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing in Regional Hospital in Hong Kong: Genomic Diagnosis of SCN2A-Related Seizure Disorder. Chin. Med. J. 2018, 131, 2262–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Najafi, M.; Tamandani, D.M.K.; Azarfar, A.; Bakey, Z.; Behjati, F.; Antony, D.; Schüle, I.; Sadeghi-Bojd, S.; Karimiani, E.G.; Schmidts, M. A 57 kB Genomic Deletion Causing CTNS Loss of Function Contributes to the CTNS Mutational Spectrum in the Middle East. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Barshop, B.A.; Ball, E.D.; Benador, N.; Trauner, D.; Phillips, S.; Dohil, R.; Afshari, N.A.; Roy, S.; Campo Fernandes, B.; Kohn, D.; et al. Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Gene Therapy for Cystinosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2026, 394, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  81. Adda Neggaz, L.; Dahmani, A.C.; Derriche, I.; Adda Neggaz, N.; Boudjema, A. Computational prediction of deleterious nonsynonymous SNPs in the CTNS gene: Implications for cystinosis. BMC Genom. Data 2025, 26, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Santoro, A.; Ferrara, Y.V.; De Angelis, A. Therapeutic strategies in cystinosis: A focus on cysteamine and beyond. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2025, 144, 104995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  83. Ouhenach, M.; Zrhidri, A.; Jaouad, I.C.; Smaili, W.; Sefiani, A. Application of next generation sequencing in genetic counseling a case of a couple at risk of cystinosis. BMC Med. Genet. 2020, 21, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Dobert, J.P.; Schäfer, J.; Dal Maso, T.; Ravindran, P.; Huard, D.J.E.; Socher, E.; Schildmeyer, L.A.; Lieberman, R.L.; Versées, W.; Moeller, A.; et al. Cryo-TEM structure of β-glucocerebrosidase in complex with its transporter LIMP-2. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Li, Y.; Chen, B.; Zou, W.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, D.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Miao, L.; et al. The lysosomal membrane protein SCAV-3 maintains lysosome integrity and adult longevity. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 215, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Quraishi, I.H.; Szekely, A.M.; Shirali, A.C.; Mistry, P.K.; Hirsch, L.J. Miglustat Therapy for SCARB2-Associated Action Myoclonus–Renal Failure Syndrome. Neurol. Genet. 2021, 7, e614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Atasu, B.; Acarlı, A.N.O.; Bilgic, B.; Baykan, B.; Demir, E.; Ozluk, Y.; Turkmen, A.; Hauser, A.; Guven, G.; Hanagasi, H.; et al. Genotype–Phenotype correlations of SCARB2 associated clinical presentation: A case report and in-depth literature review. BMC Neurol. 2022, 22, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. He, J.; Lin, H.; Li, J.; Su, H.; Wang, D.; Lin, Y.; Wang, N.; Chen, W. Identification of a Novel Homozygous Splice-Site Mutation in SCARB2 that Causes Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy with or without Renal Failure. Chin. Med. J. 2018, 131, 1575–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Hotait, M.; Dirani, M.; El Halabi, T.; Beydoun, A. Case Report: Distinctive EEG Patterns in SCARB-2 Related Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 581253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Ekmekci, H.; Qutob, O.; Babayev, H.; Şahin, A. Action Myoclonus-Renal Failure Syndrome: Case Report with Bioinformatic Annotations. Cureus 2023, 15, e41261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Smolders, S.; Van Broeckhoven, C. Genetic perspective on the synergistic connection between vesicular transport, lysosomal and mitochondrial pathways associated with Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Thomas, R.; Moloney, E.B.; Macbain, Z.K.; Hallett, P.J.; Isacson, O. Fibroblasts from idiopathic Parkinson’s disease exhibit deficiency of lysosomal glucocerebrosidase activity associated with reduced levels of the trafficking receptor LIMP2. Mol. Brain 2021, 14, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Huizing, M.; Hackbarth, M.E.; Adams, D.R.; Wasserstein, M.; Patterson, M.C.; Walkley, S.U.; Gahl, W.A.; Adams, D.R.; Dobrenis, K.; Foglio, J.; et al. Free sialic acid storage disorder: Progress and promise. Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 755, 135896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  94. Cappozzo, F.; Severino, M.; Gennaro, E.; Faravelli, F.; Martinez Popple, M.; Schiaffino, M.C.; Madeo, A.; La Rosa, A. A novel SLC17A5 variant in infantile sialic acid storage disease with hyporegenerative anemia: Neuroimaging insights and literature review. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2025, 45, 101284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Tarailo-Graovac, M.; Drögemöller, B.I.; Wasserman, W.W.; Ross, C.J.D.; van den Ouweland, A.M.W.; Darin, N.; Kollberg, G.; van Karnebeek, C.D.M.; Blomqvist, M. Identification of a large intronic transposal insertion in SLC17A5 causing sialic acid storage disease. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Sabir, M.S.; Pollard, L.; Wolfe, L.; Adams, D.R.; Ciccone, C.; Leoyklang, P.; Platt, F.M.; Huizing, M.; Gahl, W.A.; Malicdan, M.C.V. Investigating the Utility of Leukocyte Sialic Acid Measurements in Lysosomal Free Sialic Acid Storage Disorder. JIMD Rep. 2025, 66, e70029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Tondi, F.; Cirsmaru, R.A.; Conti, C.; Follenzi, A.; Gresele, P.; Olgasi, C.; Bury, L. Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome: From Molecular Pathogenesis to Targeted Therapies. IUBMB Life 2025, 77, e70025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Cavounidis, A.; Pandey, S.; Capitani, M.; Friedrich, M.; Cross, A.; Gartner, L.; Aschenbrenner, D.; Kim-Schulze, S.; Lam, Y.K.; Berridge, G.; et al. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 1 causes impaired anti-microbial immunity and inflammation due to dysregulated immunometabolism. Mucosal Immunol. 2022, 15, 1431–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  99. Gupta, A.; Utpat, K.; Desai, U.; Joshi, J. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome with interstitial lung disease: A holistically worked up couplet. Lung India 2019, 36, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Du, D.; Yang, T.; Wan, H.; Luo, F. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome with or without pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2025, 19, 17534666251374241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  101. Wei, A.; Yuan, Y.; Qi, Z.; Liu, T.; Bai, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J.; Yang, L.; Yang, X.; Li, W. Instability of BLOC-2 and BLOC-3 in Chinese patients with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2019, 32, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  102. De Pace, R.; Ghosh, S.; Williamson, C.D.; Bonifacino, J.S. BLOC-1 and BORC: Complex regulators of endolysosomal dynamics. Cell Chem. Biol. 2025, 32, 1106–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Yong, X.; Jia, G.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, S.; Deng, H.; Billadeau, D.D.; Su, Z.; Jia, D. Cryo-EM structure of the BLOC-3 complex provides insights into the pathogenesis of Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  104. Lu, J.; Ma, J.; Hao, Z.; Li, W. HPS6 Regulates the Biogenesis of Weibel–Palade Body in Endothelial Cells Through Trafficking v-ATPase to Its Limiting Membrane. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 9, 743124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  105. Yuan, Y.; Liu, T.; Huang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, T.; Yang, L.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wei, A.; et al. A zinc transporter, transmembrane protein 163, is critical for the biogenesis of platelet dense granules. Blood 2021, 137, 1804–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Yokoyama, T.; O’Brien, K.J.; Franklin, T.M.; Zuo, B.L.G.; Zuo, M.X.G.; Merideth, M.A.; Introne, W.J.; Gochuico, B.R. Impairment of Renal Function in Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome. Am. J. Nephrol. 2025, 56, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  107. Ghincea, A.; Herzog, E.L. Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Pulmonary Fibrosis: Monogenic Disorder, Multi-Omics Discovery. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2026, 74, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Huizing, M.; Malicdan, M.C.V.; Wang, J.A.; Pri-Chen, H.; Hess, R.A.; Fischer, R.; O’Brien, K.J.; Merideth, M.A.; Gahl, W.A.; Gochuico, B.R. Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome: Mutation update. Hum. Mutat. 2020, 41, 543–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  109. Wang, C.; Shi, P.; Li, Q.; Chen, C.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, R.; Kong, X. Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome: Five Chinese patients with novel variants in HPS1 and HPS6. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2021, 64, 104228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  110. Lansdon, L.A.; Chen, D.; Rush, E.T.; Engleman, K.; Zhang, L.; Saunders, C.J.; Oroszi, G. A novel likely pathogenic variant in a patient with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2021, 7, a006110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Shakil, M.; Akbar, A.; Aisha, N.M.; Hussain, I.; Ullah, M.I.; Atif, M.; Kaul, H.; Amar, A.; Latif, M.Z.; Qureshi, M.A.; et al. Delineating Novel and Known Pathogenic Variants in TYR, OCA2 and HPS-1 Genes in Eight Oculocutaneous Albinism (OCA) Pakistani Families. Genes 2022, 13, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Power, B.; Ferreira, C.R.; Chen, D.; Zein, W.M.; O’Brien, K.J.; Introne, W.J.; Stephen, J.; Gahl, W.A.; Huizing, M.; Malicdan, M.C.V.; et al. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome and oculocutaneous albinism in Chinese children with pigmentation defects and easy bruising. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2019, 14, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Bahadoran, E.; Ramezani, M.; Moghbelinejad, S. Homozygous HPS1 variant in an Iranian sibling pair with Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2025, 26, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  114. Lasseaux, E.; Plaisant, C.; Michaud, V.; Pennamen, P.; Trimouille, A.; Gaston, L.; Monfermé, S.; Lacombe, D.; Rooryck, C.; Morice-Picard, F.; et al. Molecular characterization of a series of 990 index patients with albinism. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2018, 31, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  115. Doubková, M.; Trizuljak, J.; Vrzalová, Z.; Hrazdirová, A.; Blaháková, I.; Radová, L.; Pospíšilová, Š.; Doubek, M. Novel genetic variant of HPS1 gene in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome with fulminant progression of pulmonary fibrosis: A case report. BMC Pulm. Med. 2019, 19, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Okamura, K.; Hayashi, M.; Abe, Y.; Kono, M.; Nakajima, K.; Aoyama, Y.; Nishigori, C.; Ishimoto, H.; Ishimatsu, Y.; Nakajima, M.; et al. NGS-based targeted resequencing identified rare subtypes of albinism: Providing accurate molecular diagnosis for Japanese patients with albinism. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2019, 32, 848–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Bobreshova, A.M.; Ionova, S.A.; Kadyshev, V.V.; Sukhanova, N.V.; Viakhireva, I.V.; Filatova, A.Y.; Zhurkova, N.V.; Sparber, P.A.; Marakhonov, A.V.; Vasilyeva, T.A.; et al. Masks of Albinism: Clinical Spectrum of Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  118. Caro-Rivera, L.; Malavez-Cajigas, S.; Lacourt-Ventura, M.; Rivera-Torres, A.; Marcano-Jiménez, D.E.; López-Colon, P.; Muñiz-Hernández, J.; Rivera-Jiménez, E.; Egozcue-Dionisi, M.; Román-Carlo, R.; et al. Age-related neutrophil activation in Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Type-1. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2025, 20, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  119. Serrano-González, J.; Montes-Rodríguez, I.; Renta, J.Y.; Rojas, R.; Cadilla, C.L. After an initial Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome clinical diagnosis, molecular testing reveals variants for oculocutaneous albinism type 1B: A case report. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2024, 12, e2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  120. Matsuyuki, K.; Ide, M.; Houjou, K.; Shima, S.; Tanaka, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Tomino, H.; Egashira, T.; Takayanagi, T.; Tashiro, K.; et al. Novel AP3B1 mutations in a Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome type2 with neonatal interstitial lung disease. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2022, 33, e13748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Chen, J.; Yang, Y.; Liu, B.; Xie, X.; Li, W. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 2: A rare cause of severe periodontitis in adolescents—A case study. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 914243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Aarts, C.E.M.; Karampini, E.; Wüst, T.; Webbers, S.; Varga, E.; Geissler, J.; Voorberg, J.; von Lindern, M.; Bierings, R.; van den Akker, E.; et al. Generation and characterization of a control and patient-derived human iPSC line containing the Hermansky Pudlak type 2 (HPS2) associated heterozygous compound mutation in AP3B1. Stem Cell Res. 2021, 54, 102444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Nazir, H.F.; AL Sukaiti, N.; Khater, D.; Elbeshlawy, I.; Hassanein, N. Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome: Spectrum in Oman. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2023, 45, e389–e394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  124. Jung, J.; Bohn, G.; Allroth, A.; Boztug, K.; Brandes, G.; Sandrock, I.; Schäffer, A.A.; Rathinam, C.; Köllner, I.; Beger, C.; et al. Identification of a homozygous deletion in the AP3B1 gene causing Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, type 2. Blood 2006, 108, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Wenham, M.; Grieve, S.; Cummins, M.; Jones, M.L.; Booth, S.; Kilner, R.; Ancliff, P.J.; Griffiths, G.M.; Mumford, A.D. Two patients with Hermansky Pudlak syndrome type 2 and novel mutations in AP3B1. Haematologica 2010, 95, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Luo, H.; Liu, D.; Liu, W.; Wang, G.; Chen, L.; Cao, Y.; Wei, J.; Xiao, M.; Liu, X.; Huang, G.; et al. Germline variants in UNC13D and AP3B1 are enriched in COVID-19 patients experiencing severe cytokine storms. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 2021, 29, 1312–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Gao, L.; Zhu, L.; Huang, L.; Zhou, J. Synergistic defects of UNC13D and AP3B1 leading to adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Int. J. Hematol. 2015, 102, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  128. Yin, G.; Lu, Y.; Pan, H.; Deng, B.; Wu, S.; Peng, Z.; Ye, X. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Associated with Synergistic Defects of AP3B1 and ATM Genes: A Case Report and Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  129. Chouman, C.; Salhab, S.; Martella, S.; Mousawi, Z.; Assi, A.; Chebly, A.; El Shamieh, S. A novel HPS3 pathogenic nonsense variant associated with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 3 and a platelet dysfunction. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2026, 53, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  130. Mai, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, B.; Liu, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, S. Case report: Inflammatory bowel disease in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 3 due to novel variant in HPS3. Front. Genet. 2025, 16, 1465527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  131. Zaman, Q.; Sadeeda; Anas, M.; Rehman, G.; Khan, Q.; Iftikhar, A.; Ahmad, M.; Owais, M.; Ahmad, I.; Muthaffar, O.; et al. Report of Hermansky–Pudlak Syndrome in Two Families with Novel Variants in HPS3 and HPS4 Genes. Genes 2023, 14, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Lecchi, A.; La Marca, S.; Femia, E.A.; Lenz, A.; Boeckelmann, D.; Artoni, A.; Peyvandi, F.; Zieger, B. Novel variant in HPS3 gene in a patient with Hermansky Pudlak syndrome (HPS) type 3. Platelets 2020, 31, 960–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  133. Chen, C.; Wang, R.; Yuan, Y.; Li, J.; Yu, X. Clinical Features and Novel Genetic Variants Associated with Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome. Genes 2022, 13, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  134. Bastida, J.M.; Morais, S.; Palma-Barqueros, V.; Benito, R.; Bermejo, N.; Karkucak, M.; Trapero-Marugan, M.; Bohdan, N.; Pereira, M.; Marin-Quilez, A.; et al. Identification of novel variants in ten patients with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome by high-throughput sequencing. Ann. Med. 2019, 51, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Marek-Yagel, D.; Abudi-Sinreich, S.; Macarov, M.; Veber, A.; Shalva, N.; Philosoph, A.M.; Pode-Shakked, B.; Malicdan, M.C.V.; Anikster, Y. Oculocutaneous albinism and bleeding diathesis due to a novel deletion in the HPS3 gene. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 936064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Dong, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, T.; Fan, L.; Gallone, S. Whole-Exome Sequencing Identified a Novel Homozygous Frameshift Mutation of HPS3 in a Consanguineous Family with Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 4535349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  137. Bastida, J.M.; Morais, S.; Palma-Barqueros, V.; Benito, R.; Bermejo, N.; Karkucak, M.; Trapero-Marugan, M.; Bohdan, N.; Pereira, M.; Marín-Quílez, A.; et al. Ten New Cases of Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome in the Iberian Peninsula: Identification of Novel Genetic Variants in HPS3, HPS4, HPS6 and DTNBP1 Associated with Significant Clinical Complications. Blood 2018, 132, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  138. Hu, X.; Guo, R.; Qi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Hao, C. Genetic screening reveals hotspot variants and prevalence rates of Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome in the Chinese population. Clin. Chim. Acta 2024, 561, 119813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. Anderson, P.D.; Huizing, M.; Claassen, D.A.; White, J.; Gahl, W.A. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 4 (HPS-4): Clinical and molecular characteristics. Hum. Genet. 2003, 113, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  140. Liu, Q.; Qing, W.; Guo, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J. A novel homozygous HPS4 mutation in Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome: Case report and literature review. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2025, 19, 17534666251383677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  141. Wu, W.; Lin, K.; Yang, Y.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, T.; Lei, W.; Yang, W.; Yang, Z. A novel mutation causes Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 4 with pulmonary fibrosis in 2 siblings from China. Medicine 2019, 98, e16899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. He, K.; Nie, Z. System analysis based on the lysosome-related genes identifies HPS4 as a novel therapy target for liver hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1221498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Michaud, V.; Lasseaux, E.; Plaisant, C.; Verloes, A.; Perdomo-Trujillo, Y.; Hamel, C.; Elcioglu, N.H.; Leroy, B.; Kaplan, J.; Jouk, P.; et al. Clinico-molecular analysis of eleven patients with Hermansky–Pudlak type 5 syndrome, a mild form of HPS. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2017, 30, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  144. Boeckelmann, D.; Wolter, M.; Neubauer, K.; Sobotta, F.; Lenz, A.; Glonnegger, H.; Käsmann-Kellner, B.; Mann, J.; Ehl, S.; Zieger, B. Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome: Identification of Novel Variants in the Genes HPS3, HPS5, and DTNBP1 (HPS-7). Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 12, 786937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  145. Botero, J.P.; Chen, D.; Majerus, J.A.; Coon, L.M.; He, R.; Warad, D.M.; Pruthi, R.K.; Nichols, W.L. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome subtype 5 (HPS-5) novel mutation in a 65 year-old with oculocutaneous hypopigmentation and mild bleeding diathesis: The importance of recognizing a subtle phenotype. Platelets 2018, 29, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  146. Abou Tayoun, A.N.; Pesaran, T.; DiStefano, M.T.; Oza, A.; Rehm, H.L.; Biesecker, L.G.; Harrison, S.M. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion. Hum. Mutat. 2018, 39, 1517–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  147. Zhou, B.; Yang, J.; Bai, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, N.; Cao, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Y. Novel Variants of HPS6 Cause Suspected Ocular Albinism: A Report of 2 Cases and the Profile of HPS6 Variants. Ophthalmic Res. 2024, 67, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Alhozali, H. Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Type 6 and Renal Failure: A Rare Genetic Disease. Curēus 2023, 15, e47970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Karim, S.; Saharti, S.; Alganmi, N.; Mirza, Z.; Alfares, A.; Turkistany, S.; Al-Attas, M.; Noureldin, H.; Al Sakkaf, K.; Abusamra, H.; et al. Two Novel Homozygous HPS6 Mutations (Double Mutant) Identified by Whole-Exome Sequencing in a Saudi Consanguineous Family Suspected for Oculocutaneous Albinism. Life 2021, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  150. Han, C.G.; O’Brien, K.J.; Coon, L.M.; Majerus, J.A.; Huryn, L.A.; Haroutunian, S.G.; Moka, N.; Introne, W.J.; Macnamara, E.; Gahl, W.A.; et al. Severe bleeding with subclinical oculocutaneous albinism in a patient with a novel HPS6 missense variant. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2018, 176, 2819–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. O’Brien, K.J.; Lozier, J.; Cullinane, A.R.; Osorio, B.; Nghiem, K.; Speransky, V.; Zein, W.M.; Mullikin, J.C.; Neff, A.T.; Simon, K.L.; et al. Identification of a novel mutation in HPS6 in a patient with hemophilia B and oculocutaneous albinism. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2016, 119, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  152. Rodrigues, R.; Quental, R.; Santos Silva, R.; Costa, L.; Estrela-Silva, S. Unraveling Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome type 7: A case report and comprehensive literature review on the identification of DTNBP1 variants. Ophthalmic Genet. 2024, 45, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  153. Bryan, M.M.; Tolman, N.J.; Simon, K.L.; Huizing, M.; Hufnagel, R.B.; Brooks, B.P.; Speransky, V.; Mullikin, J.C.; Gahl, W.A.; Malicdan, M.C.V.; et al. Clinical and molecular phenotyping of a child with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome-7, an uncommon genetic type of HPS. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2017, 120, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  154. Morgan, N.V.; Pasha, S.; Johnson, C.A.; Ainsworth, J.R.; Eady, R.A.J.; Dawood, B.; McKeown, C.; Trembath, R.C.; Wilde, J.; Watson, S.P.; et al. A Germline Mutation in BLOC1S3/Reduced Pigmentation Causes a Novel Variant of Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome (HPS8). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 78, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  155. Pennamen, P.; Tingaud-Sequeira, A.; Michaud, V.; Morice-Picard, F.; Plaisant, C.; Vincent-Delorme, C.; Giuliano, F.; Azarnoush, S.; Capri, Y.; Marçon, C.; et al. Novel variants in the BLOC1S3 gene in patients presenting a mild form of Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021, 34, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  156. Liu, T.; Yuan, Y.; Bai, D.; Yao, X.; Zhang, T.; Huang, Q.; Qi, Z.; Yang, L.; Yang, X.; Li, W.; et al. The first Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome type 9 patient with two novel variants in Chinese population. J. Dermatol. 2021, 48, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  157. Michaud, V.; Fiore, M.; Coste, V.; Huguenin, Y.; Bordet, J.; Plaisant, C.; Lasseaux, E.; Morice-Picard, F.; Arveiler, B. A new case with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 9, a rare cause of syndromic albinism with severe defect of platelets dense bodies. Platelets 2021, 32, 420–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  158. Kahani, S.M.; Saray, A.R.; Kahaei, M.S.; Dehghani, A.; Mohammadi, P.; Garshasbi, M. A novel deletion in the BLOC1S6 Gene Associated with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 9 (HPS-9). BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  159. Okamura, K.; Abe, Y.; Araki, Y.; Wakamatsu, K.; Seishima, M.; Umetsu, T.; Kato, A.; Kawaguchi, M.; Hayashi, M.; Hozumi, Y.; et al. Characterization of melanosomes and melanin in Japanese patients with Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome types 1, 4, 6, and 9. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2018, 31, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  160. Feng, Y.; Xie, N.; Inoue, F.; Fan, S.; Saskin, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, F.; Hansen, M.E.B.; Nyambo, T.; Mpoloka, S.W.; et al. Integrative functional genomic analyses identify genetic variants influencing skin pigmentation in Africans. Nat. Genet. 2024, 56, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  161. Montoliu, L.; Marks, M.S. A new type of syndromic albinism associated with mutations in AP3D1. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2017, 30, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  162. Ammann, S.; Schulz, A.; Krägeloh-Mann, I.; Dieckmann, N.M.G.; Niethammer, K.; Fuchs, S.; Eckl, K.M.; Plank, R.; Werner, R.; Altmüller, J.; et al. Mutations in AP3D1 associated with immunodeficiency and seizures define a new type of Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. Blood 2016, 127, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  163. Balaraddi, V.; Nawlakhe, K.; Shilpa, K.; Bandiya, P. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome—Rare type 10 with AP3D1 mutation. Oxf. Med. Case Rep. 2025, 2025, omaf184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  164. Mohammed, M.; Al-Hashmi, N.; Al-Rashdi, S.; Al-Sukaiti, N.; Al-Adawi, K.; Al-Riyami, M.; Al-Maawali, A. Biallelic mutations in AP3D1 cause Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 10 associated with immunodeficiency and seizure disorder. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2019, 62, 103583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  165. Frohne, A.; Koenighofer, M.; Cetin, H.; Nieratschker, M.; Liu, D.T.; Laccone, F.; Neesen, J.; Nemec, S.F.; Schwarz-Nemec, U.; Schoefer, C.; et al. A homozygous AP3D1 missense variant in patients with sensorineural hearing loss as the leading manifestation. Hum. Genet. 2022, 142, 1077–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  166. Alizadeh, P.; Babadi, A.J.; Ghadiri, N.; Neissi, M.; Zeinali, M. Gene variant analysis in pediatrics with early-onset epilepsy: Identification of novel variants. Pract. Lab. Med. 2025, 45, e00462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  167. Neuffer, S.J.; Beltran-Cardona, D.; Jimenez-Perez, K.; Clancey, L.F.; Brown, A.; New, L.; Cooper, C.D. AP-3 complex subunit delta gene, ap3d1, regulates melanogenesis and melanophore survival via autophagy in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2022, 35, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  168. Fang, L.; Xu, X.; Lu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, J. Long noncoding RNA SNHG8 accelerates acute gouty arthritis development by upregulating AP3D1 in mice. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 9803–9815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  169. Du, W.; Hua, F.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Wang, W.; Zhou, J.; Wang, W.; Liao, P.; Yan, Y.; et al. Loss of Optineurin Drives Cancer Immune Evasion via Palmitoylation-Dependent IFNGR1 Lysosomal Sorting and Degradation. Cancer Discov. 2021, 11, 1826–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  170. Li, S.; Yoshida, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Kubota, M.; Matsutani, T.; Mine, S.; Machida, T.; Maezawa, Y.; Takemoto, M.; Yokote, K.; et al. Serum anti-AP3D1 antibodies are risk factors for acute ischemic stroke related with atherosclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  171. Pennamen, P.; Le, L.; Tingaud-Sequeira, A.; Fiore, M.; Bauters, A.; Van Duong Béatrice, N.; Coste, V.; Bordet, J.; Plaisant, C.; Diallo, M.; et al. BLOC1S5 pathogenic variants cause a new type of Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome. Genet. Med. 2020, 22, 1613–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  172. Boeckelmann, D.; Wolter, M.; Käsmann-Kellner, B.; Koehler, U.; Schieber-Nakamura, L.; Zieger, B. A Novel Likely Pathogenic Variant in the BLOC1S5 Gene Associated with Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Type 11 and an Overview of Human BLOC-1 Deficiencies. Cells 2021, 10, 2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  173. Zhong, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J. A novel BLOC1S5-related HPS-11 patient and zebrafish with bloc1s5 disruption. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021, 34, 1112–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  174. Zhao, M.; Liu, J.; Yu, Q.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, Z.; Jia, M.; Zeng, X.; Wu, C.; Ye, C.; et al. IRF4-BLOC1S5: The first rearrangement gene identified in TEMPI syndrome. Haematologica 2024, 109, 2701–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  175. Benvenuto, L.; Qayum, S.; Kim, H.; Robbins, H.; Shah, L.; Dimango, A.; Magda, G.; Grewal, H.; Lemaitre, P.; Stanifer, B.P.; et al. Lung Transplantation for Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated with Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome. A Single-center Experience. Transplant. Direct 2022, 8, e1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  176. Burke, W.; Parens, E.; Chung, W.K.; Berger, S.M.; Appelbaum, P.S. The Challenge of Genetic Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance: A Narrative Review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2022, 175, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  177. De La Vega, F.M.; Chowdhury, S.; Moore, B.; Frise, E.; McCarthy, J.; Hernandez, E.J.; Wong, T.; James, K.; Guidugli, L.; Agrawal, P.B.; et al. Artificial intelligence enables comprehensive genome interpretation and nomination of candidate diagnoses for rare genetic diseases. Genome Med. 2021, 13, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of intracellular trafficking of lysosomal components and associated disease pathways. This figure is designed with Gemini 2.0.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of intracellular trafficking of lysosomal components and associated disease pathways. This figure is designed with Gemini 2.0.
Genes 17 00643 g001
Figure 2. Simplified diagram of the role of BLOC complexes in endosome and melanosome biogenesis. Dashed arrows represent interaction of BLOC complexes with endosome or melanosome. HPS types are depicted next to corresponding defective LRO genes. This figure is designed with ChatGPT 5.0.
Figure 2. Simplified diagram of the role of BLOC complexes in endosome and melanosome biogenesis. Dashed arrows represent interaction of BLOC complexes with endosome or melanosome. HPS types are depicted next to corresponding defective LRO genes. This figure is designed with ChatGPT 5.0.
Genes 17 00643 g002
Table 1. Genotype–Phenotype Correlation of CTNS Variants in Cystinosis Subtypes.
Table 1. Genotype–Phenotype Correlation of CTNS Variants in Cystinosis Subtypes.
SubtypeClinical FeaturesKey Variant Types *Severity
Infantile nephropathic cystinosisMost severe form. Presents in infancy (typically 6–12 months) with Fanconi syndrome, growth retardation, and progressive proximal tubular dysfunction. Without treatment, progresses to end-stage kidney disease in childhood.CTNS loss-of-function variants including large deletions, nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site variants, and severe missense variants affecting functionally important domains. Biallelic (homozygous or compound heterozygous).Severe
Juvenile (intermediate) cystinosisLater onset in childhood or adolescence with slower progression of renal dysfunction. Less aggressive than infantile form but still leads to chronic kidney disease.Biallelic CTNS variants with residual protein function, commonly missense or splice-region variants, including some combinations of one severe + one milder allele. May or may not involve functionally important domains.Moderate
Ocular (non-nephropathic) cystinosisPrimarily corneal cystine crystal deposition causing photophobia and ocular discomfort. No clinically significant renal disease.Hypomorphic CTNS variants that preserve partial function; often missense variants outside key functional regions or mild regulatory/splice variants in biallelic form.Mild
* This table was compiled based on data from (ClinVar_CTNS) and the referenced literature.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vlasova-St. Louis, I.; Khaiboullina, S. Next-Generation Sequencing and Variant Cataloguing for Screening and Diagnosis of Mucolipidoses and Other Lysosome-Related Organelle Disorders, Including Lysosomal Membrane or Transport Disorders. Genes 2026, 17, 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17060643

AMA Style

Vlasova-St. Louis I, Khaiboullina S. Next-Generation Sequencing and Variant Cataloguing for Screening and Diagnosis of Mucolipidoses and Other Lysosome-Related Organelle Disorders, Including Lysosomal Membrane or Transport Disorders. Genes. 2026; 17(6):643. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17060643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vlasova-St. Louis, Irina, and Svetlana Khaiboullina. 2026. "Next-Generation Sequencing and Variant Cataloguing for Screening and Diagnosis of Mucolipidoses and Other Lysosome-Related Organelle Disorders, Including Lysosomal Membrane or Transport Disorders" Genes 17, no. 6: 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17060643

APA Style

Vlasova-St. Louis, I., & Khaiboullina, S. (2026). Next-Generation Sequencing and Variant Cataloguing for Screening and Diagnosis of Mucolipidoses and Other Lysosome-Related Organelle Disorders, Including Lysosomal Membrane or Transport Disorders. Genes, 17(6), 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17060643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop