Next Article in Journal
Unusual Profile of Germline Genetic Variants in Unselected Colorectal Cancer Patients from a High-Prevalence Region in Panama
Previous Article in Journal
Panel-Based Genetic Testing in a Consecutive Series of Individuals with Inherited Retinal Diseases in Australia: Identifying Predictors of a Diagnosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eight New Sedum Plastomes: Comprehensive Analyses and Phylogenetic Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Expression Analysis of β-Glucosidase Gene Under Abiotic Stresses in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2025, 16(8), 889; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080889
Submission received: 30 June 2025 / Revised: 23 July 2025 / Accepted: 25 July 2025 / Published: 27 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Adaptation and Evolutionary Genetics in Plants)

Abstract

Background: Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is highly susceptible to various abiotic stresses during their growth and development, leading to severe reductions in both yield and quality. β-Glucosidase (BGLU) is widely involved in plant growth and development, as well as in the response to abiotic stress. Methods: We performed a genome-wide identification of pepper BGLU (CaBGLU) genes. Phylogenetic analysis included BGLU proteins from Arabidopsis, tomato, and pepper. Gene structures, conserved motifs, and promoter cis-elements were analyzed bioinformatically. Synteny within the pepper genome was assessed. Protein-protein interaction potential was predicted. Gene expression patterns were analyzed across tissues and under abiotic stresses using transcriptomic data and qRT-PCR. Subcellular localization of a key candidate protein CaBGLU21 was confirmed experimentally. Results: We identified 32 CaBGLU genes unevenly distributed across eight chromosomes. Phylogenetic classification of 99 BGLU proteins into 12 subfamilies revealed an uneven distribution of CaBGLUs across six subfamilies. Proteins within subfamilies shared conserved motifs and gene structures. CaBGLU promoters harbored abundant light-, hormone- (MeJA, ABA, SA, GA), and stress-responsive elements (including low temperature). A duplicated gene pair (CaBGLU19/CaBGLU24) was identified. 27 CaBGLU proteins showed potential for interactions. Expression analysis indicated CaBGLU5 and CaBGLU30 were mesophyll-specific, while CaBGLU21 was constitutively high in non-leaf tissues. CaBGLU21 was consistently upregulated by cold, heat, and ABA. Subcellular localization confirmed CaBGLU21 resides in the tonoplast. Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis characterizes the pepper BGLU gene family. CaBGLU21, exhibiting constitutive expression in non-leaf tissues, strong upregulation under multiple stresses, and tonoplast localization, emerges as a prime candidate gene for further investigation into abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms in pepper. The findings provide a foundation for future functional studies and stress-resistant pepper breeding.

1. Introduction

Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), a member of the Solanaceae family, is a widely cultivated annual or short-lived perennial plant globally. Its fruits are used not only as fresh vegetables and spices but also serve as raw materials for the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [1]. However, pepper production is frequently confronted with various abiotic stresses, such as drought, soil salinization, and high temperatures, which significantly reduce both yield and quality. Therefore, identifying stress-resistant genes in pepper and investigating its stress tolerance mechanisms are crucial.
β-Glucosidase (BGLU), also known as β-D-glucoside glucohydrolase, was first discovered in bitter almonds [2,3]. In higher plants, BGLU genes exist as multigene families and extensively participate in defense responses [4], cell wall lignification [5,6], and key physiological processes including plant hormone signaling activation and secondary metabolism [7,8,9]. The glycoside hydrolase (GH) family comprises 166 subfamilies, classified into GH1, GH3, GH5, and GH116 [10]. Among these, GH1 represents the largest subfamily, with the majority of identified plant BGLUs belonging to this group [11]. To date, BGLU gene families have been systematically characterized in several plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana (47 members) [12], Oryza sativa (40) [13], Medicago truncatula (51) [14], Zea mays (26) [15], and Brassica rapa (64) [16]. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Arabidopsis AtBGLU45, AtBGLU46, and AtBGLU47 cluster with the coniferin β-glucosidase gene from Pinus contorta, suggesting their potential involvement in lignification through monolignol glucoside hydrolysis [17]. Functional studies demonstrate that suppression of OsBGLU6 in rice leads to multiple phenotypic consequences: dwarfism, reduced leaf ABA content, enhanced drought sensitivity, decreased photosynthetic rate, and elevated intercellular CO2 concentration, collectively impairing drought tolerance [18]. SrBGLU16 is substantially upregulated in response to dark treatment [19]. Beyond their established roles in cell wall metabolism and phytohormone activation, members of the BGLU gene family are crucial players in plant stress defense responses.
The BGLU gene family in pepper has not yet been systematically characterized, significantly hindering the functional investigation of its members. This study performed genome-wide identification of the pepper BGLU gene family using its complete genome sequence and comparative genomic data from the characterized BGLU families of A. thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum. We comprehensively characterized the identified BGLU members through analyses of their physicochemical properties, gene structures, phylogenetic relationships, chromosomal distributions, cis-acting elements, and syntenic relationships. Expression patterns of pepper BGLU genes in various tissues and under stress treatments were analyzed using qRT-PCR. Subcellular localization of CaBGLU21 was also determined. This study provides valuable insights into the roles of the pepper BGLU gene family in growth, development, and stress responses, establishing a foundation for breeding stress-resistant pepper cultivars.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Seeds of the heat-tolerant pepper cultivar ‘17CL30’ were surface-sterilized with 55 °C hot water for 15 min, germinated at 28 °C until radicle emergence, and subsequently grown in climate-controlled growth chambers under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod with day/night temperatures of 28 °C and 24 °C, respectively.
At the six-true-leaf stage, pepper plants were subjected to various treatments including low temperature (10 °C), high temperature (42 °C), ABA (30 μM), IAA (2 μM), GA (2 μM), H2O2 (30 mM), NaCl (200 mM), and JA (10 μM), with plants under normal growth conditions serving as the control. For temperature treatments, whole plants were transferred to climate-controlled chambers. For chemical treatments (ABA, IAA, GA, H2O2, NaCl, JA), plants were removed from soil, their roots were gently washed with deionized water, and then carefully transferred to Hoagland nutrient solution for 24 h acclimation. After adaptation, the chemical agents were directly supplemented into the existing nutrient solution at specified concentrations. The concentrations of the tested agents and time windows were determined based on Pepper Hub database protocols (http://pepperhub.hzau.edu.cn/, accessed on 20 March 2024). Leaf samples were collected from each treatment at 1, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h post-treatment, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C. Three biological replicates were included per treatment.
Roots, stems, leaves (at the six-leaf one-heart stage), flowers (adult plant stage), and fruits (green mature stage) of pepper were collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for tissue-specific expression analysis.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. The Identification of the CaBGLU Gene Family

To identify potential members of the BGLU family in pepper, protein sequences of the Zunla-1 cultivar were retrieved from the Pepper Genome Platform (https://plantgarden.jp/en/list/t4072/genome/t4072.G002, accessed on 1 November 2024). Concurrently, BGLU protein sequences from tomato (S. lycopersicum) and A. thaliana were obtained from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 1 November 2024) to construct a local protein database. Three complementary approaches were employed to identify pepper BGLU genes. First, the β-glucosidase domain Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile (PF00232) was acquired from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 1 November 2024). Second, a custom HMM was built using hmmbuild (Ubuntu environment), followed by screening the Zunla-1 proteome with HMMER’s hmmsearch program (v.3.2.1) to identify putative BGLU proteins (E < 1 × 10−5). Third, BLASTP analysis was performed using BioEdit (v7.0.5.3), aligning Arabidopsis and tomato BGLU sequences against the pepper proteome to detect homologous genes. Candidate proteins from all three methods were consolidated, and redundancies were removed. Finally, conserved domains were validated using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 2 November 2024) and CDD (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/, accessed on 2 November 2024). Only sequences containing the Glyco_hydro_1 domain were retained as bona fide members of the BGLU family in pepper.

2.2.2. Physicochemical Characterization and Subcellular Localization Prediction of the CaBGLU Gene Family

The physicochemical properties of pepper BGLU family members—including amino acid count, molecular weight, isoelectric point (pI), instability index, aliphatic index, and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY)—were analyzed using ExPASy (https://www.expasy.org/, accessed on 4 November 2024). Subcellular localization was predicted using Cell-PLoc 2.0 (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/, accessed on 4 November 2024).

2.2.3. Chromosomal Localization and Phylogenetic Analysis of the CaBGLU Gene Family

Chromosomal localization was analyzed using the MG2C online tool (http://mg2c.iask.in/mg2c_v2.0/, accessed on 6 November 2024). To investigate evolutionary relationships among BGLU genes, protein sequences from A. thaliana, S. lycopersicum, and C. annuum were aligned using Clustal X (v1.83). A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was then constructed with MEGA-X (v10.2.6) using default parameters. The resulting tree was visualized and annotated using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 6 November 2024).

2.2.4. Prediction of Conserved Motifs, Gene Structures, and Cis-Acting Elements in the CaBGLU Gene Family

Conserved motif analysis of pepper BGLU proteins was performed using MEME Suite (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 7 November 2024) with 10 output motifs and default parameters.
Promoter regions (2000 bp upstream of transcription start sites) were extracted from pepper BGLU genes using TBtools (v2.210). Cis-regulatory elements were predicted using the PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 7 November 2024), followed by visualization with TBtools (v2.210).

2.2.5. Collinearity Analysis of CaBGLU Gene Family

Genome-wide synteny analysis of BGLU family members was performed using TBtools (v2.210), employing both intraspecific (within C. annuum) and interspecific (across related species) comparisons through the “One Step MCScanX” and “Advanced Circos” plugins.

2.2.6. Protein–Protein Interaction Network Analysis of the CaBGLU Gene Family

Protein–protein interaction networks of the CaBGLU family were predicted using the STRING database (https://string-db.org/, accessed on 8 November 2024).

2.2.7. Expression Profile Analysis of CaBGLU Gene Family Members

Expression profiles of C. annuum across leaf, flower, and fruit developmental stages, plus abiotic stress and phytohormone treatments, were retrieved from PepperHub (http://pepperhub.hzau.edu.cn/, accessed on 20 November 2024). Data were preprocessed (normalization, filtering) using Microsoft Excel (v16.85) and visualized as hierarchical clustered heatmaps through TBtools (v2.210), distinguishing tissue-specific and stress-responsive expression patterns.

2.2.8. qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from C. annuum leaves using the Polysaccharide-Polyphenol Plant RNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using the UnionScript First Strand cDNA Synthesis Mix for qPCR (with dsDNase; Genesand Biotech, Beijing, China) and stored at −20 °C. Gene-specific primers (Table S1) were designed with Primer Premier 6.0, with β-Actin as the reference gene. Quantitative PCR was performed in 20 μL reactions containing 10 μL AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 0.4 μM of each primer, and 2 μL cDNA template. Thermal cycling conditions on a QuantStudio 5 system (Applied Biosystems) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were 95 °C for 30 s; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s; and 60 °C for 30 s. Three biological replicates, each with technical triplicates, were analyzed per sample. Relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Statistical significance (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05) was determined using SPSS Statistics v27.0 (IBM), with data visualized in Origin 2021.

2.2.9. Subcellular Localization of CaBGLU21

The subcellular localization vector for CaBGLU21 was constructed as follows. The target gene was amplified from cDNA of heat-stressed (42 °C, 24 h) C. annuum seedling leaves using primers pART-CAM-eGFP-CaBGLU21-F/R. The purified PCR product was cloned into the pART-CAM-eGFP expression vector via homologous recombination using XhoI/EcoRI restriction sites. The recombinant plasmid pART-CAM-eGFP-CaBGLU21 was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells. Positive clones were selected on LB/kanamycin plates (37 °C, 16 h), verified by colony PCR, and sequenced. For transient expression, both recombinant and empty vectors were electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. Bacterial suspensions were infiltrated into the abaxial surfaces of fully expanded leaves from 40-day-old Nicotiana benthamiana plants. After overnight incubation at 22 °C in darkness, plants were maintained under normal growth conditions for 2–3 days. Fluorescence signals were ultimately visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP8; Wetzlar, Germany). GFP was excited at 488 nm and emission collected at 500–550 nm; mCherry was excited at 561 nm and emission collected at 570–620 nm. Chloroplast autofluorescence was detected at 640 nm under 675 nm excitation.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Physicochemical Characterization of the CaBGLU Gene Family

This study systematically identified 32 BGLU family genes in pepper, which were designated as CaBGLU1 through CaBGLU32 according to their chromosomal locations. Comprehensive physicochemical characterization revealed considerable diversity in the molecular properties of these CaBGLU proteins (Table S2). Protein lengths vary from 127 to 631 amino acids, corresponding to molecular weights ranging between 14.65 and 71.72 kDa. pI points span from 5.09 to 9.64, classifying the proteins into 17 acidic (pI < 7) and 15 alkaline (pI > 7) groups. Instability index analysis showed that 29 members are stable proteins (index < 40), while CaBGLU25, CaBGLU26, and CaBGLU29 are predicted to be unstable (index > 40). The aliphatic indices (67.83–101.54) suggest good thermostability, and the GRAVY values for all members except CaBGLU29 indicate predominant hydrophilicity. Subcellular localization predictions indicated that 27 members (84.4% of the total) were exclusively localized to the vacuole, while 5 members (CaBGLU11, CaBGLU14, CaBGLU15, CaBGLU20, and CaBGLU29) were predicted to localize to both the chloroplast and vacuole, though the predictions did not specify their exact suborganellar positions, implicating their potential roles in organelle-specific metabolic processes.

3.2. Chromosomal Localization and Phylogenetic Analysis

The 32 CaBGLU genes were unevenly distributed across eight chromosomes of C. annuum (Figure 1), with significant clustering observed. Chromosome 0 contained the highest density (12 genes), followed by chromosome 1 (5 genes). Chromosomes 3 and 7 each harbored four genes, while chromosomes 2, 8, and 12 contained two genes each. Chromosome 4 possessed only a single CaBGLU member. This distribution pattern suggests chromosomal hotspots for gene duplication events, particularly on chromosome 0, potentially driving the expansion of this gene family in pepper.
To investigate the evolutionary relationships of the pepper BGLU family, we constructed a phylogenetic tree comprising BGLU proteins from three species: A. thaliana (47 members), S. lycopersicum (20 members), and C. annuum (32 members) (Figure 2). Based on the clustering patterns observed in the Arabidopsis and tomato BGLU families, the 99 BGLU proteins were classified into twelve subfamilies (I–XII). The analysis revealed that CaBGLU proteins are unevenly distributed across six subfamilies: Subfamily I contains the largest number of CaBGLUs (9 members); Subfamilies VIII and IX each include 4 CaBGLU proteins; Subfamilies X and XI each contain 6 CaBGLU proteins; and Subfamily XII comprises 3 CaBGLU members. Notably, Subfamilies II–VII lack any CaBGLU representatives.

3.3. Analysis of Conserved Motifs and Exon-Intron Structures

Analysis of conserved motif distribution among BGLU proteins revealed that each member contained 1 to 10 motifs, with differential conservation across the family (Figure 3). Motif 1 was the most prevalent, present in 26 CaBGLU proteins (81.3% of family members), followed by Motif 10 (24 proteins; 75%). Motifs 2, 3, 6, and 7 exhibited intermediate conservation (21–23 proteins; 65.6–71.9%), whereas Motifs 4, 5, and 8 occurred in 17–20 members (53.1–62.5%). Notably, Motif 9 demonstrated the lowest frequency, appearing in only 11 CaBGLU proteins (34.4%). Six proteins—CaBGLU4, CaBGLU5, CaBGLU8, CaBGLU19, CaBGLU27, and CaBGLU28—contained the complete set of 10 motifs, suggesting they may represent ancestral forms with comprehensive functional domains. In stark contrast, CaBGLU16 possessed only a single motif (Motif 1), indicating either extreme functional specialization or potential degradation of ancestral domains during evolution.
Genomic annotation of the C. annuum genome revealed substantial variation in exon-intron architecture among CaBGLU family members (Figure 3). The exon number ranged from 3 to 13. CaBGLU5, CaBGLU8, CaBGLU28, and CaBGLU31 exhibited the highest number of exons (13 each), indicating complex structural organization. Conversely, CaBGLU7 and CaBGLU11 possessed the simplest structures, with only 3 exons, suggesting potential evolutionary streamlining or alternative splicing variants.

3.4. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements in the Promoter Region

Analysis of cis-acting elements within the 2000 bp promoter regions upstream of CaBGLU genes identified eight major functional categories: light-responsive, MeJA-responsive, abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive, salicylic acid (SA)-responsive, gibberellin (GA)- responsive, circadian control, low-temperature responsive, and defense/stress-responsive elements (Figure 4). Notably, light-responsive elements were the most abundant, present in all CaBGLU promoters with the exception of CaBGLU24, suggesting photoregulation as a central regulatory mechanism for this gene family. The co-enrichment of stress- and hormone-related elements—particularly MeJA-, ABA-, and defense-responsive motifs—indicates that pepper BGLU genes participate in plant–pathogen interactions and adaptation to environmental stresses, including low temperature and biotic stressors.

3.5. Collinearity Analysis of the CaBGLU Gene Family

Intraspecific collinearity analysis of pepper CaBGLU genes revealed a duplication event between CaBGLU19 (chromosome 2) and CaBGLU24 (chromosome 4) (Figure 5). Interspecies collinearity analysis of BGLU genes in C. annuum, A. thaliana, S. lycopersicum, and O. sativa demonstrated extensive genomic homology (Figure 6). CaBGLU genes showed the highest number of homologous pairs with A. thaliana (eight pairs), followed by S. lycopersicum (6 pairs), and the lowest with O. sativa (two pairs).

3.6. Protein–Protein Interaction Network Analysis of the CaBGLU Family

Protein–protein interaction network analysis of CaBGLU family members revealed that CaBGLU5, CaBGLU12, CaBGLU17, CaBGLU29, and CaBGLU32 showed no detectable interactions, whereas CaBGLU8, CaBGLU9, and CaBGLU30 exhibited the highest connectivity (13) (Figure 7), suggesting functional divergence within the family.

3.7. Expression Profiling of CaBGLU Genes Across Pepper Tissues and Stress Treatments

Transcriptomic analysis of 32 CaBGLU genes across five pepper tissues—leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, and placenta—revealed distinct expression patterns (Figure 8). Only CaBGLU5 and CaBGLU30 were detected in leaves, with potential involvement in leaf-specific processes such as photosynthetic metabolism or defense-related activities in mesophyll cells. CaBGLU21 exhibited constitutively high expression in all non-leaf tissues, indicating potential housekeeping roles. CaBGLU6, CaBGLU10, and CaBGLU27 showed elevated expression in fruits and placenta, potentially associated with defense compound biosynthesis A. CaBGLU2, CaBGLU8, CaBGLU15, CaBGLU18, CaBGLU19, CaBGLU20, CaBGLU23, and CaBGLU24 displayed flower-specific expression, supporting roles in reproductive development. CaBGLU26 was predominantly expressed in fruits, suggesting the regulation of ripening processes.
Transcriptomic analysis of CaBGLU gene expression under multiple abiotic stresses—cold, heat, ABA, IAA, GA, H2O2, NaCl, and JA—revealed distinct regulatory patterns (Figure 9). CaBGLU21 was upregulated under all treatments, peaking at 12 h post-induction, suggesting function as a possible stress adaptation regulator. CaBGLU3, CaBGLU4, CaBGLU5, CaBGLU6, CaBGLU10, CaBGLU13, CaBGLU15, CaBGLU19, CaBGLU25, CaBGLU26, CaBGLU27, and CaBGLU29 exhibited sustained high expression across most stresses, indicating involvement in broad-spectrum stress adaptation. From 12 to 24 h post-treatment, the expression levels of most CaBGLU genes (e.g., CaBGLU3, CaBGLU4, CaBGLU21) exhibited a significant decline under all stress conditions (Figure 9). Notably, CaBGLU21, despite its initial upregulation, showed a >50% reduction in transcript abundance by 24 h in response to cold, heat, and ABA treatments. The remaining CaBGLU genes showed minimal transcriptional changes, potentially maintaining basal physiological functions.

3.8. Relative Expression Levels of CaBGLU Genes in Pepper

To investigate the expression profiles of CaBGLU genes, four randomly selected members (CaBGLU4, CaBGLU13, CaBGLU21, and CaBGLU26) were analyzed via qRT-PCR under NaCl and ABA treatments. The results demonstrated a biphasic response in relative expression levels (Figure 10). The expression dynamics of CaBGLU genes revealed a biphasic response. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differential expression (p > 0.05) for these genes during the early stress response phase (1–3 h post-treatment). However, significant upregulation (p < 0.05) was detected at 6 h for CaBGLU4 and at 12 h for CaBGLU13, CaBGLU21, and CaBGLU26 (Figure 10). This suggests that the selected CaBGLU genes might function in the middle-to-late phases of stress response, thus potentially being involved in adaptation processes.

3.9. Subcellular Localization of CaBGLU21

To validate subcellular localization predictions, the CaBGLU21-eGFP fusion construct (pART-CAM-eGFP vector) and empty eGFP control were transiently expressed in tobacco epidermal cells. Tonoplast marker mCherry (TP-mCherry) confirmed organelle positions. Confocal microscopy revealed tonoplast localization of CaBGLU21 (Figure 11).

4. Discussion

Pepper, as a widely cultivated vegetable crop in China, is vulnerable to both biotic and abiotic stresses that limit yield and quality, and faces escalating threats from extreme heat events under climate change. While β-glucosidases (BGLUs) are known to regulate plant physiological processes—particularly in secondary metabolism and stress responses—and have been extensively studied in Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and maize, they remain uncharacterized in pepper. In this study, we systematically identified pepper BGLU genes, analyzed their phylogenetic relationships, promoter cis-elements, and collinearity patterns, and compared their expression profiles across different tissues, stress treatments, and hormone treatments. Additionally, we conducted subcellular localization assays.
Bioinformatics analysis identified 32 BGLU family genes in pepper, all predicted to localize to vacuoles or chloroplasts, consistent with findings in Dendrobium catenatum [20] and Z. mays [21]. Given the vacuole’s critical roles in nutrient storage, stress response, and metabolic turnover, coupled with prior evidence that the Arabidopsis vacuolar-localized BGLU10 enhances drought tolerance [22], we hypothesize that these genes significantly influence pepper development and stress adaptation. These 32 CaBGLU genes are unevenly distributed across eight chromosomes, with most located near telomeres, and encode proteins containing 10 conserved motifs. Most genes were identified in homologous pairs, indicating potential functional redundancy. Phylogenetic analysis grouped them unevenly into six subfamilies, each containing orthologs from tomato, supporting Solanaceae-specific evolutionary conservation.
Cis-acting element prediction revealed that BGLU gene promoters are enriched with light-responsive, exogenous ABA- and GA-associated regulatory motifs, suggesting their potential roles in photosynthesis, photomorphogenesis, and hormone signaling. Collinearity analysis further identified 16 syntenic gene pairs between pepper CaBGLUs and their orthologs in A. thaliana and S. lycopersicum, reflecting evolutionary conservation across these species and indicating potential functional similarity in associated biological processes.
Expression of BGLU genes exhibits pronounced tissue specificity, as demonstrated in the AtBGLU and OsBGLU families where specific members (e.g., OsBGLU10, OsBGLU24, and OsBGLU33) play specialized roles in processes such as seed germination, root elongation, and drought tolerance [23]. Similarly, we observed distinct expression patterns of CaBGLU genes across various pepper tissues, indicating their functional diversification in plant growth and development. CaBGLU5 and CaBGLU30 exhibited leaf-specific expression, but their precise biological roles require further investigation. Given the functional diversity of leaf cell types—including photosynthesis in mesophyll, stomatal regulation in guard cells, and auxin biosynthesis in vascular tissues—future studies should determine whether these genes localize to specific cell types and participate in defined physiological processes such as carbon metabolism or stress-induced defense responses.
The evolutionary significance of β-glucosidases in plant stress adaptation is underscored by their conservation across diverse plant species. The expansion of the BGLU gene family through gene duplication events, such as the CaBGLU19/CaBGLU24 pair identified in this study, has likely contributed to functional diversification, allowing plants to fine-tune their responses to various environmental stresses. Notably, the retention of stress-responsive cis-elements in CaBGLU promoters and the up-regulation of specific members (e.g., CaBGLU21) under multiple stresses suggest evolutionary selection for stress adaptation. This functional conservation highlights the fundamental role of BGLU enzymes in hydrolyzing stress-related compounds to activate defense responses, a mechanism that has been evolutionarily optimized to enhance survival in fluctuating environments. BGLU genes play crucial roles in plant responses to abiotic stress and hormone signaling [24]. Evidence demonstrates that overexpression of specific Arabidopsis genes, such as AtBGLU10 [22] and AtBGLU18 [25], enhances tolerance to abiotic stresses like drought and salinity, concomitant with increased ABA levels. Mechanistically, AtBGLU18 [25] and AtBGLU33 [26] hydrolyze glucose-conjugated ABA, thereby elevating free ABA levels and activating downstream ABA responses, including drought tolerance. Similarly, ABA treatment significantly upregulates specific MsBGLUs (MsBGLU99, MsBGLU63, MsBGLU62, MsBGLU78, MsBGLU49) in Medicago sativa [27]. In maize, ZmBGLU1 enhances salt stress tolerance, potentially via defense responses or phytohormone activation [15]. FtBGLU34 and FtBGLU38 in Tartary buckwheat are markedly stress-induced, with FtBGLU29 exhibiting the strongest upregulation under ABA treatment. The decline in CaBGLU transcript levels from 12 to 24 h post-induction may reflect a feedback regulation mechanism to prevent prolonged metabolic costs under stress. Similar transient expression patterns have been reported for AtBGLU18 in Arabidopsis under ABA treatment, where rapid mRNA turnover limits sustained hormone activation [25].
The BGLU gene family enhances plant stress resilience primarily by activating phytohormone crosstalk, while also modulating cell wall remodeling and secondary metabolism [28]. Further supporting this conserved role, MtBGLU21, MtBGLU22, MtBGLU28, and MtBGLU30 in M. truncatula are strongly induced by both abiotic stress and hormonal treatments [14]. Consistent with these findings in other species, our study identified that CaBGLU4/13/21/26 reached peak expression at 6–12 h post-treatment, indicating roles in sustained stress adaptation rather than immediate signaling. Early response genes (1–3 h) may require further investigation.
While this study provides insights into CaBGLU stress responses, certain technical limitations warrant acknowledgment. The initial protocol involving root washing and transfer may introduce transient stress artifacts. Although our optimized hydroponic acclimation procedure minimized this effect, future studies should employ non-invasive agent application methods. Additionally, while agent concentrations followed database protocols, dose response assays including IC50 determination could further refine treatment precision.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we systematically identified 32 CaBGLU genes within the pepper (C. annuum) genome. Comprehensive analyses were conducted to characterize these genes, including their physicochemical properties, genomic organization (chromosomal distribution, gene structure, collinearity), evolutionary relationships (phylogenetics), regulatory potential (cis-acting elements), protein interaction networks, and expression dynamics (tissue-specificity and responses to NaCl and ABA stress). Notably, subcellular localization assays confirmed that CaBGLU21 resides in the tonoplast. Furthermore, qRT-PCR analysis revealed a characteristic transcriptional response pattern for CaBGLU genes under NaCl and ABA treatments, typically involving an initial decrease followed by an increase in expression. Collectively, these findings provide a crucial foundation for elucidating the functional roles and molecular mechanisms of the BGLU gene family in pepper growth, development, and stress adaptation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes16080889/s1, Table S1: The primer sequences used in this study; Table S2: Information of BGLU gene family members in pepper.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W.; methodology, J.W. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W. and J.H.; writing—review and editing, J.W., J.H. and X.J.; visualization, J.W., J.H., X.J., Z.H. and Y.Y.; supervision, R.T. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Shanxi Science and Technology Innovation Talent Team (202304051001018), Key Project of the Key Research and Development Program of Shanxi Province (202202140601006), and the Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths (202203021212451).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used for the analysis in this study are available in the article and the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BGLUβ-Glucosidase
GHglycoside hydrolase

References

  1. Kim, S.; Park, M.; Yeom, S.-I.; Kim, Y.-M.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, H.-A.; Seo, E.; Choi, J.; Cheong, K.; Kim, K.-T.; et al. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodrigues, P.D.O.; Santos, B.V.D.; Costa, L.; Henrique, M.A.; Baffi, M.A. Xylanase and β-glucosidase production by Aspergillus fumigatus using commercial and lignocellulosic substrates submitted to chemical pre-treatments. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 95, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. González-Pombo, P.; Fariña, L.; Carrau, F.; Batista-Viera, F.; Brena, B.M. A novel extracellular β-glucosidase from Issatchenkia terricola: Isolation, immobilization and application for aroma enhancement of white Muscat wine. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Duroux, L.; Delmotte, F.M.; Lancelin, J.-M.; KÉRavis, G.; Jay-Allemand, C. Insight into naphthoquinone metabolism: β-glucosidase-catalysed hydrolysis of hydrojuglone β-d-glucopyranoside. Biochem. J. 1998, 333, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dharmawardhana, D.P.; Ellis, B.E.; Carlson, J.E. A β-Glucosidase from lodgepole pine xylem specific for the lignin precursor coniferin. Plant Physiol. 1995, 107, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morant, A.V.; Bjarnholt, N.; Kragh, M.E.; Kjærgaard, C.H.; Jørgensen, K.; Paquette, S.M.; Piotrowski, M.; Imberty, A.; Olsen, C.E.; Møller, B.L.; et al. The β-Glucosidases responsible for bioactivation of hydroxynitrile glucosides in Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1072–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ketudat Cairns, J.R.; Mahong, B.; Baiya, S.; Jeon, J.-S. β-Glucosidases: Multitasking, moonlighting or simply misunderstood? Plant Sci. 2015, 241, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sampedro, J.; Valdivia, E.R.; Fraga, P.; Iglesias, N.; Revilla, G.; Zarra, I. Soluble and membrane-bound β-glucosidases are involved in trimming the xyloglucan backbone. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, H.; Xue, Y.; Lin, Y. Enhanced catalytic efficiency in quercetin-4′-glucoside hydrolysis of thermotoga maritima β-Glucosidase A by site-directed mutagenesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6763–6770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lombard, V.; Golaconda Ramulu, H.; Drula, E.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids. Res. 2014, 42, D490–D495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Henrissat, B. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem. J. 1991, 280, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, Z.; Escamilla-Treviño, L.; Zeng, L.; Lalgondar, M.; Bevan, D.; Winkel, B.; Mohamed, A.; Cheng, C.-L.; Shih, M.-C.; Poulton, J.; et al. Functional genomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana glycoside hydrolase family 1. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 55, 343–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Opassiri, R.; Pomthong, B.; Onkoksoong, T.; Akiyama, T.; Esen, A.; Ketudat Cairns, J.R. Analysis of rice glycosyl hydrolase family 1 and expression of Os4bglu12 β-glucosidase. BMC Plant Biol. 2006, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, J.; Ma, L.; Jiang, W.; Yao, Y.; Tang, Y.; Pang, Y. Comprehensive identification and characterization of abiotic stress and hormone responsive glycosyl hydrolase family 1 genes in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2021, 158, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gómez-Anduro, G.; Ceniceros-Ojeda, E.A.; Casados-Vázquez, L.E.; Bencivenni, C.; Sierra-Beltrán, A.; Murillo-Amador, B.; Tiessen, A. Genome-wide analysis of the beta-glucosidase gene family in maize (Zea mays L. var B73). Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77, 159–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dong, X.; Jiang, Y.; Hur, Y. Genome-wide analysis of glycoside hydrolase family 1 β-glucosidase genes in Brassica rapa and their potential role in pollen development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Escamilla-Treviño, L.L.; Chen, W.; Card, M.L.; Shih, M.-C.; Cheng, C.-L.; Poulton, J.E. Arabidopsis thaliana β-Glucosidases BGLU45 and BGLU46 hydrolyse monolignol glucosides. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1651–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.; Chen, S.; Dong, Y.; Ren, R.; Chen, D.; Chen, X. Chloroplastic Os3BGlu6 contributes significantly to cellular ABA pools and impacts drought tolerance and photosynthesis in rice. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1042–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xu, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, M.; Huang, S.; Yuan, H.; Tong, H. Identification of GH1 gene family fgt members in Stevia rebaudiana and their expression when grown in darkness. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 8739–8746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, X.; Deng, X.; Li, J.; Wang, M. Genome-wide identification and characterization of active ingredients related β-Glucosidases in Dendrobium catenatum. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kristoffersen, P.; Brzobohaty, B.; Höhfeld, I.; Bako, L.; Melkonian, M.; Palme, K. Developmental regulation of the maize Zm-p60.1 gene encoding a β-glucosidase located to plastids. Planta 2000, 210, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, P.; Liu, H.; Hua, H.; Wang, L.; Song, C.-P. A vacuole localized β-glucosidase contributes to drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2011, 56, 3538–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, R.; Li, D.; Zhen, C.; Chen, D.; Chen, X. Specific roles of Os4BGlu10, Os6BGlu24, and Os9BGlu33 in seed germination, root elongation, and drought tolerance in rice. Planta 2019, 249, 1851–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bian, Z.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y.; Xi, Y.; Wang, X.; Meng, S. Analysis of Populus glycosyl hydrolase family I members and their potential role in the ABA treatment and drought stress response. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2021, 163, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, K.H.; Piao, H.L.; Kim, H.-Y.; Choi, S.M.; Jiang, F.; Hartung, W.; Hwang, I.; Kwak, J.M.; Lee, I.-J.; Hwang, I. Activation of glucosidase via stress-induced polymerization rapidly increases active pools of abscisic acid. Cell 2006, 126, 1109–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, Z.-Y.; Lee, K.H.; Dong, T.; Jeong, J.C.; Jin, J.B.; Kanno, Y.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Seo, M.; Bressan, R.A.; et al. A vacuolar β-glucosidase homolog that possesses glucose-conjugated abscisic acid hydrolyzing activity plays an important role in osmotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2184–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kong, H.; Song, J.; Ma, S.; Yang, J.; Shao, Z.; Li, Q.; Li, Z.; Xie, Z.; Yang, P.; Cao, Y. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the glycosyl hydrolase family 1 genes in Medicago sativa revealed their potential roles in response to multiple abiotic stresses. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, H.; Yao, X.; Wu, W.; He, A.; Ma, C.; Yang, S.; Ruan, J. Genome-wide identification and gene expression pattern analysis of the glycoside hydrolase family 1 in Fagopyrum tataricum. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of the CaBGLU gene family on 8 chromosomes in pepper.
Figure 1. Distribution of the CaBGLU gene family on 8 chromosomes in pepper.
Genes 16 00889 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of BGLU family members of A. thaliana (At), S. lycopersicum (Sl), and C. annuum (Ca).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of BGLU family members of A. thaliana (At), S. lycopersicum (Sl), and C. annuum (Ca).
Genes 16 00889 g002
Figure 3. Prediction of BGLU family protein structure in pepper.
Figure 3. Prediction of BGLU family protein structure in pepper.
Genes 16 00889 g003
Figure 4. Cis-acting elements of the pepper BGLU family.
Figure 4. Cis-acting elements of the pepper BGLU family.
Genes 16 00889 g004
Figure 5. The inter-genomic collinearity of CaBGLU genes in pepper. Circos plot structure: Innermost ring (Chr00–12) represents chromosomes; yellow band indicates gene density; outermost ring shows chromosomal positions of 32 CaBGLU genes. Collinearity relationships: Gray lines denote genome-wide duplication events; red lines indicate CaBGLU-specific duplication events.
Figure 5. The inter-genomic collinearity of CaBGLU genes in pepper. Circos plot structure: Innermost ring (Chr00–12) represents chromosomes; yellow band indicates gene density; outermost ring shows chromosomal positions of 32 CaBGLU genes. Collinearity relationships: Gray lines denote genome-wide duplication events; red lines indicate CaBGLU-specific duplication events.
Genes 16 00889 g005
Figure 6. Synteny analyses of the BGLU genes between C. annuum and three representative plants (A. thaliana, S. lycopersicum, and O. sativa). Gray background lines indicate synteny blocks across all genomes. Blue lines highlight syntenic C. annuum BGLU gene pairs with A. thaliana, S. lycopersicum, and O. sativa.
Figure 6. Synteny analyses of the BGLU genes between C. annuum and three representative plants (A. thaliana, S. lycopersicum, and O. sativa). Gray background lines indicate synteny blocks across all genomes. Blue lines highlight syntenic C. annuum BGLU gene pairs with A. thaliana, S. lycopersicum, and O. sativa.
Genes 16 00889 g006
Figure 7. Predicted protein–protein interaction network of the BGLU gene family. Nodes represent gene products, with color intensity indicating interaction degree (darker = higher connectivity). Line thickness corresponds to interaction strength (thicker = stronger associations). Edge saturation scales with confidence scores.
Figure 7. Predicted protein–protein interaction network of the BGLU gene family. Nodes represent gene products, with color intensity indicating interaction degree (darker = higher connectivity). Line thickness corresponds to interaction strength (thicker = stronger associations). Edge saturation scales with confidence scores.
Genes 16 00889 g007
Figure 8. Expression analysis of CaBGLU in different tissues in pepper.
Figure 8. Expression analysis of CaBGLU in different tissues in pepper.
Genes 16 00889 g008
Figure 9. Expression analysis of CaBGLU in different treatments in pepper.
Figure 9. Expression analysis of CaBGLU in different treatments in pepper.
Genes 16 00889 g009
Figure 10. Relative expression of four representative CaBGLU genes under NaCl and ABA treatments. (A) Expression patterns under NaCl treatment. (B) Expression patterns under ABA treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to one-way ANOVA.
Figure 10. Relative expression of four representative CaBGLU genes under NaCl and ABA treatments. (A) Expression patterns under NaCl treatment. (B) Expression patterns under ABA treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to one-way ANOVA.
Genes 16 00889 g010
Figure 11. Subcellular localization analysis of CaBGLU21 in tobacco leaves. Panels show (left to right): GFP fluorescence, TP-mCherry, chloroplast autofluorescence, bright-field, and merged channels. Scale bar = 25 μm.
Figure 11. Subcellular localization analysis of CaBGLU21 in tobacco leaves. Panels show (left to right): GFP fluorescence, TP-mCherry, chloroplast autofluorescence, bright-field, and merged channels. Scale bar = 25 μm.
Genes 16 00889 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Huang, J.; Jia, X.; Hao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Tian, R.; Liang, Y. Characterization and Expression Analysis of β-Glucosidase Gene Under Abiotic Stresses in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Genes 2025, 16, 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080889

AMA Style

Wang J, Huang J, Jia X, Hao Z, Yang Y, Tian R, Liang Y. Characterization and Expression Analysis of β-Glucosidase Gene Under Abiotic Stresses in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Genes. 2025; 16(8):889. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080889

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jing, Jiaxin Huang, Xu Jia, Zhenxin Hao, Yuancai Yang, Ruxia Tian, and Yanping Liang. 2025. "Characterization and Expression Analysis of β-Glucosidase Gene Under Abiotic Stresses in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)" Genes 16, no. 8: 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080889

APA Style

Wang, J., Huang, J., Jia, X., Hao, Z., Yang, Y., Tian, R., & Liang, Y. (2025). Characterization and Expression Analysis of β-Glucosidase Gene Under Abiotic Stresses in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Genes, 16(8), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080889

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop