Previous Article in Journal
SLC30A3 as a Zinc Transporter-Related Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target in Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Psychosocial Factors Involved in Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Plot Twist: When RNA Yields Unexpected Findings in Paired DNA-RNA Germline Genetic Testing

Ambry Genetics, 1 Enterprise Drive, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(11), 1382; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111382 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 October 2025 / Revised: 6 November 2025 / Accepted: 11 November 2025 / Published: 13 November 2025

Abstract

Background: Germline genetic variants impacting splicing are a frequent cause of disease. The clinical interpretation of such variants is challenging for many reasons including the immense complexity of splicing mechanisms. While recent advances in splicing algorithms have improved the accuracy of splice prediction, predicting the nature and abundance of aberrant splicing remains challenging. As RNA testing becomes more mainstream in the clinical diagnostic setting, the complexities of interpretation are coming to light. Methods: Data from patients undergoing concurrent DNA and RNA testing were retrospectively reviewed for unusual splicing impacts to underscore some of these complexities and serve as exemplars in how to avoid pitfalls in the interpretation of sequence variants. Results: Seven rare variants with unusual splicing impacts are presented: a variant at a consensus donor nucleotide position lacking a splice impact (NF1 c.888+2T>C); a mid-exonic missense variant creating a novel donor site and a cryptic acceptor site resulting in pseudo-intronization (BRIP1 c.727A<G p.Ile243Val); one variant creating a spliceosome switch from U12 to U2 (LZTR1 c.2232G>A p.Ala744Ala); two variants that would be expected to result in nonsense-mediated-mRNA-decay triggering splicing impacts that obviated nonsense-mediated-decay (APC c.1042C>T p.Arg348Ter and BRCA2 c.6762del; c.6816_6841+1534del); and two variants causing splicing impacts through pyrimidine tract optimization (NF1 c.5750-184_5750-178dup and ATM c.3480G>T p.Val1160Val). Conclusions: Paired DNA and RNA testing revealed unexpected splice events altering variant interpretation, expanding our knowledge of clinically important splicing mechanisms and highlighting the benefit of RNA testing.
Keywords: RNA; splicing; genetic testing; spliceosome; aberrant splicing; alternative splicing; variant interpretation RNA; splicing; genetic testing; spliceosome; aberrant splicing; alternative splicing; variant interpretation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zimmermann, H.; Brannan, T.; Young, C.; Ramirez Castano, J.; Horton, C.; Richardson, A.; Molparia, B.; Richardson, M.E. A Plot Twist: When RNA Yields Unexpected Findings in Paired DNA-RNA Germline Genetic Testing. Genes 2025, 16, 1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111382

AMA Style

Zimmermann H, Brannan T, Young C, Ramirez Castano J, Horton C, Richardson A, Molparia B, Richardson ME. A Plot Twist: When RNA Yields Unexpected Findings in Paired DNA-RNA Germline Genetic Testing. Genes. 2025; 16(11):1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zimmermann, Heather, Terra Brannan, Colin Young, Jesus Ramirez Castano, Carolyn Horton, Alexandra Richardson, Bhuvan Molparia, and Marcy E. Richardson. 2025. "A Plot Twist: When RNA Yields Unexpected Findings in Paired DNA-RNA Germline Genetic Testing" Genes 16, no. 11: 1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111382

APA Style

Zimmermann, H., Brannan, T., Young, C., Ramirez Castano, J., Horton, C., Richardson, A., Molparia, B., & Richardson, M. E. (2025). A Plot Twist: When RNA Yields Unexpected Findings in Paired DNA-RNA Germline Genetic Testing. Genes, 16(11), 1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop