Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Stroke Genetics—Unraveling the Complexity of Cerebral Infarction: A Brief Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Heterozygous p.A684V Variant in the WFS1 Gene Is a Mutational Hotspot Causing a Severe Hearing Loss Phenotype
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Suppression of Nodule Formation by RNAi Knock-Down of Bax inhibitor-1a in Lotus japonicus

1
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China
2
College of Life Sciences & Institute for Conservation and Utilization of Agro-Bioresources in Dabie Mountains, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16010058
Submission received: 20 November 2024 / Revised: 28 December 2024 / Accepted: 5 January 2025 / Published: 6 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: The balanced regulation of innate immunity plays essential roles in rhizobial infection and the establishment and maintenance of symbiosis. The evolutionarily conserved cell death suppressor Bax inhibitor-1 plays dual roles in nodule symbiosis, providing a valuable clue in balancing immunity and symbiosis, while it remains largely unexplored in the legume Lotus japonicus. Methods/Results: In the present report, the BI-1 gene family of L. japonicus was identified and characterized. We identified 6 BI-1 genes that translate into peptides containing 240–255 amino acids with different structural characteristics and isoelectric points. We performed phylogenetic analyses and detected evolutionary conservation and divergence among BI-1 proteins from L. japonicus, Glycine max, Medicago truncatula, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa. Expression profiles among different roots indicated that the inoculation of MAFF303099 significantly increased the expression of most of the L. japonicus BI-1 family genes. We down-regulated the transcripts of LjBI-1a by RNA interference and observed that LjBI-1a promotes nodulation and nodule formation. Conclusions: These discoveries shed light on the functions of BI-1 genes in L. japonicus, and simultaneously emphasize the potential application of LjBI-1a in enhancing the symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability of legumes.

1. Introduction

In agricultural production, nitrogen is a core element determining biomass and yield [1], while excessive use of nitrogen fertilizers not only raises production expenses but also leads to soil and water pollution, causing adverse environmental impacts [2,3]. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) is capable of transforming atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia that can be absorbed and utilized by plants and subsequently participate in the material cycle of ecosystems [4,5], thereby reducing dependence on industrial nitrogen fertilizers and minimizing the environmental impact of agricultural production. With continuous in-depth research into the mechanisms of symbiotic nitrogen fixation and technological innovations, there is potential to apply this technology to a wider range of crop species and agricultural production models [6]. This will contribute to enhancing the productivity of agricultural operations, reducing production expenses, mitigating environmental pollution, and promoting the development of agriculture toward a greener and more sustainable direction.
The establishment of SNF systems between legumes and soil rhizobia requires precise interaction between the two genomic backgrounds [7,8]. When soil rhizobia encounter phenolic compounds secreted by legume roots, they will respond to these signals by synthesizing and releasing nodulation factor (NF), surface polysaccharides, secreted proteins, and other host-specific determinants [9,10]. These rhizobial signal molecules are subsequently recognized by the root hair cells of legumes, triggering a series of host responses [11]. At the outset of nodule development, legumes need to recognize and accommodate specific rhizobia, and this process involves the initial recognition mechanisms of the plant defense system [12]. Under the action of the NFs of compatible rhizobia, the root hairs of host plants curl to form a sheath, providing conditions for rhizobia invasion. Rhizobia infiltrate the root hair sheath via root hair formation, preparing for further infection. Within the root hair sheath, rhizobia stimulate the development of a tube-like structure referred to as the infection thread (IT) [13,14,15]. The IT elongates through the root hair sheath towards the root’s cortical cells, providing a pathway for deeper rhizobial infection [16,17]. Once rhizobia successfully invade, the plant immune system needs to be moderately suppressed to allow rhizobia to proliferate within the plant and form nodules [12,18]. The plant immune system not only plays an important role in nodule formation but also finely regulates nodule development by modulating the activity of immune cells and the transmission of signaling molecules [19], which helps ensure stable reproduction of rhizobia within the plant and the normal development of nodules.
Lotus japonicus is a perennial herb belonging to the genus Lotus in the Fabaceae family. It possesses nitrogen-fixing capabilities, which make it an important model for studying plant–microbe symbiotic relationships [20]. As a model legume, L. japonicus not only has a small genome with a simple structure but also has a short lifecycle, which can improve the research efficiency of scientists [21]. At present, research on L. japonicus has mainly focused on the molecular biological characteristics, genetic improvements, and mechanisms of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. These studies offer strong support for agriculture, animal husbandry, and ecological environmental protection [22].
Bax inhibitor-1 (BI-1) is a highly conserved endoplasmic-reticulum-resident protein that acts as a cell death suppressor [23,24] and can suppress programmed cell death (PCD) in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants [25,26], such as those from drought [27], high salinity [27,28], or pathogen infection [29]. BI-1 not only participates in plant stress tolerance but also plays critical roles in the growth and development of plants, such as can be seen in research showing that overexpressing BI-1 in Arabidopsis thaliana may lead to growth retardation and changes in leaf morphology [30,31]. Currently, studies have shown the dual role of BI-1 in the symbiotic relationship between legumes and rhizobia. Research indicates that significant changes in BI-1 expression levels occur during the nascent stages of the symbiotic relationship between legumes and rhizobia, similar to changes in the expression of certain defense-related proteins [32,33].
In this report, we identified and characterized six L. japonicus BI-1 family genes. The potential functions of these L. japonicus BI-1 genes in nodulation or nodule formation were explored by using expression profiles among different roots. The function analysis of LjBI-1a (Lj0g3v0072129) revealed that LjBI-1a promotes nodulation and nodule formation. These studies provide valuable insights for the exploration of the symbiotic roles of L. japonicus BI-1 genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of the LjBI-1 Gene Family

To identify the genes belonging to the Bax inhibitor-1 family in L. japonicus, we searched the L. japonicus database (https://www.kazusa.or.jp/lotus/) accessed on 6 July 2024 using the GmBI-1a gene sequence as the template sequence and identified six candidate BI-1 genes. The protein sequences of these six genes were downloaded and validated by searching the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) accessed on 6 July 2024 and Phytozome databases (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/) accessed on 6 July 2024. SignalP—4.1 (https://services.Healthtech.dtu.Dk/services/SignalP-4.1/) accessed on 6 July 2024 and ExPasy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam) accessed on 6 July 2024 were used to analyze the protein signal peptide, molecular weight, amino acid number, isoelectric point, and other information of these six BI-1 genes.

2.2. Phylogenetic Relationship Analysis and Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

Using Clustal W, a multiple sequence alignment tool, a comparative analysis was conducted on BI-1 proteins from L. japonicus, Oryza sativa, Glycine max, A. thaliana, and Medicago truncatula. Following this alignment, a neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGAX64 [34], with a Bootstrap value set at 1000 to ensure the robustness and reliability of the resulting phylogenetic tree. Lastly, the phylogenetic tree was visually enhanced and improved using the Evolview online tool accessible at (https://evolgenius.info/evolview-v2/#login) accessed on 7 July 2024, providing a more intuitive and aesthetically pleasing representation of the evolutionary relationships among the species.
The conserved amino acid sequences of the six LjBI-1 genes were aligned using the NCBI Online Comparison Tool. Three conserved motifs were identified, including the Bax inhibitor (BI)-1 protein family motif, the Integral membrane protein YbhL motif, and the Conjugal transfer coupling protein TraG motif.

2.3. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The wild-type or transgenic L. japonicus ‘MG-20’ seedlings were grown in a chamber under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 22 °C. Following a week of acclimatization, the plants were inoculated with the M. loti strain MAFF303099 and cultivated in the same medium without ammonium nitrate.

2.4. Generation of Transgenic Hairy Roots

The hairy root transformation method of L. japonicus currently used in research has the characteristics of high efficiency, simple cultivation conditions, and strong genetic stability, and has important value in plant gene function research and genetic analysis [35]. The ‘MG-20’ wild-type L. japonicus was employed to generate transgenic hairy roots via a process mediated by A. rhizogenes, a method documented in previous studies [34,35]. Aseptically cultivated seedlings on agar were severed at their hypocotyl bases and marinated in a broth of A. rhizogenes LBA1334 carrying plasmids for a 30 min duration within a Petri dish. Subsequently, cotyledon-attached seedlings were positioned on MS medium agar plates fortified with 1.5% (w/v) sucrose and nurtured in a growth chamber for a span of five days. Following this, they were relocated to agar plates infused with 250 μg/mL cefotaxime to develop further for an additional ten days, promoting the proliferation of hairy roots from the hypocotyl base. A short tip (2 to 3 mm) from each hairy root was excised and subjected to a GUS activity test in a staining solution (including 1 mm K3Fe(CN)6, 1 mm K4Fe(CN)6, 10 mm Na2EDTA, 0.1% (w/v) N-laurylsarcosine, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, and 100 mm sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.0) at 37 °C in the dark overnight. Each hairy root was marked, and the tips of hairy roots that did not exhibit GUS activity were excised, whereas those that displayed GUS activity were preserved to continue their growth. Each seedling was permitted to retain one or two transgenic hairy roots. The seedlings equipped with transgenic hairy roots were then transferred to pots containing a blend of vermiculite and sand in equal proportions with a half-strength Broughton and Dilworth (B&D) medium [36]. They were cultivated in a chamber under the conditions of a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at a temperature of 22 °C. Following a week of acclimatization, the plants were inoculated with the M. loti strain MAFF303099 and grown in the same medium without ammonium nitrate.

2.5. LjBI-1-Specific RNAi

Two specific RNAi constructs were designed for LjBI-1a, aiming to silence a 135 bp sequence within the 5′-untranslated region (labeled as RNAi-1) and a 199 bp sequence within the 3′-untranslated region (labeled as RNAi-2), respectively. For comparison, control hairy roots were produced using the cloning vector CAM-BIA1301-35S-int-T7. Transgenic hairy roots were inoculated with M. loti strain MAFF303099 for nodulation, and nodulation phenotypes were scored after 4 weeks.

2.6. qPCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted using TRIpure reagent (Aidlab, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The quality and quantity of the RNA were checked using agarose gel electrophoresis and a nanophotometer. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using HiScript IV RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) from Vazyme (Nanjing, China). The specific primers for the tested genes were synthesized by tsingke Biotech (Beijing, China). and are listed in Table S1. The qPCR reactions were conducted in a 20 μL volume, with a cycling protocol that included initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 39 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 20 s, and were run on a Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR system, using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). The relative expression levels of the tested genes were analyzed using the 2−∆∆Ct method, and Lj-Actin7 (Lj1g0015665) was selected as the internal control gene to normalize the expression levels of the tested genes. Additionally, all of the qPCR analyses were repeated over three times.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The relative experiments were repeated more than three times. The presented values are the means ± SDs. Asterisks represent significant differences, as determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01, * 0.01 < p < 0.05, ns: p > 0.05).

2.8. Rhizobial Infection Assay

For the rhizobial infection experiment, the transgenic hairy roots were infected with the M. loti strain MAFF303099, which stably expresses the lacZ reporter gene, and were cultivated in pots filled with a 1:1 mixture of sand and vermiculite. Ten days post-inoculation, the transgenic hairy roots were subjected to β-galactosidase activity staining based on the protocols outlined in previous studies [37,38] and then examined under bright-field illumination using an Olympus BX51 microscope.

3. Results

3.1. Genome-Wide Identification of LjBI-1 Genes in L. japonicus

To identify the BI-1 genes in L. japonicus, we searched the L. japonicus database (https://www.kazusa.or.jp/lotus/) accessed on 6 July 2024, using the GmBI-1a gene sequence as the template sequence, and identified six candidate BI-1 genes; then, these genes were validated by searching the NCBI and the Phytozome databases (L. japonicus Lj1.0v1). These genes were named LjBI-1a~LjBI-1f based on their positions in chromosomes. Detailed information is listed in Table 1. These identified L. japonicus BI-1 genes encode peptides with 240 (LjBI-1b) ~255 amino acid residues (LjBI-1f), an isoelectric point (pI) of 6.41 (LjBI-1f) ~9.26 (LjBI-1c), and a proportion of SignalIP of 0.021% (LjBI-1a) ~0.228% (LjBI-1f). The exon and intron structures of the six LjBI-1 genes were analyzed by comparing their cDNA sequences with their genomic sequences. The results showed that most of the LjBI-1 family genes contained four exons and three introns; only LjBI-1c contained six exons and five introns. It was found that only LjBI-1c has two transcripts; the rest of the genes have only one transcript.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of BI-1 Genes from L. japonicus, M. truncatula, G. max, A. thaliana, and O. sativa

To study the phylogenetic relationships of BI-1 genes in L. japonicus, M. truncatula, G. max, A. thaliana, and O. sativa, we performed a phylogenetic analysis based on alignments of the 53 full-length BI-1 protein sequences, with the results shown in Figure 1. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed using MEGA version 11.0 divided these BI-1 proteins into three major groups (Group A to Group C), and each group featured its own distinct and highly conserved amino acid sequences (Figures S1–S3). Among them, Group A was identified as the smallest group, composed of six BI-1 genes. Group B was recognized as the largest group, composed of six O. sativa BI-1 genes, four A. thaliana BI-1 genes, five G. max BI-1 genes, seven M. tarantula BI-1 genes, and three L. japonicus BI-1 genes. Group C was formed by 13 BI-1 genes, including a specific sub branch of legumes consisting of 9 legume plant BI-1 genes (subgroup C1, Figure 1). This result indicates that the potential biological functions of some BI-1 genes are conserved in legume plants. We further conducted a sequence alignment analysis of these nine BI-1 genes in subgroup C1, and the results demonstrated that these deduced peptides, containing a Bax inhibitor (BI)-1 protein family motif, an Integral membrane protein YbhL motif, and a Conjugal transfer coupling protein TraG motif [39], represented potential symbiosis-related BI-1 proteins (Figure 2).

3.3. Expression Profile of LjBI-1 Genes in L. japonicus Roots with and Without Inoculation of MAFF303099

To determine whether LjBI-1 genes participate in symbiotic signal transduction and nodule formation, we conducted qPCR analysis to compare the expression levels of the six LjBI-1 genes in different roots (the control and those inoculated with MAFF303099) at 6 h, 30 h, and 3 days post-inoculation (Figure 3). The inoculation of MAFF303099 significantly increased the expression of LjBI-1a (Lj0g3v0072129) and LjBI-1e (Lj5g3v2183610) (>2 fold) at 6 hR and 30 hR post-inoculation (Figure 3A,E). In the roots, at 3 days after inoculation with MAFF303099, the expression levels of LjBI-1b (Lj1g3v4447000) and LjBI-1f (Lj6g3v1888050) significantly increased (>2 fold) (Figure 3B,F). No change was observed in the expression levels of LjBI-1c (Lj2g3v1989060) and LjBI-1d (Lj5g3v1003620) (Figure 3C,D).

3.4. Suppression of Nodulation by LjBI-1a RNAi

As described above, both LjBI-1a (Lj0g3v0072129) and LjBI-1c (Lj2g3v1989060) were in the specific sub branch of legumes (Figure 1), and the expression of LjBI-1a was inducted by rhizobial inoculation (Figure 3A), suggesting that LjBI-1a may participate in nodulation. To validate this tentative result, two LjBI-1a-specific RNAi constructs were prepared to target a 135 bp fragment containing the 5′-untranslated region (RNAi-1) and a 199 bp fragment containing the 3′-untranslated region (RNAi-2), respectively. Control and transgenic hairy roots were inoculated with the M. loti strain MAFF303099 for nodulation. The cloning vector CAMBIA1301-35S-int-T7 was used to generate control hairy roots. In the results of qPCR analysis, the LjBI-1a transcript was reduced to 60% in RNAi-1 and 80% in RNAi-2, as compared with that in the control hairy roots (Figure 4E). At 30 days after rhizobial inoculation, the nodulation phenotypes were scored, and the results are shown in Figure 4A–D. Nodule numbers (Figure 4A,B), root length (Figure 4C), and root fresh weight (Figure 4D) in LjBI-1a RNAi hairy roots were significantly lower than those in the control. The expressions of two early nodulin genes, NIN and ENOD40 [40,41,42], as well as a typical nodulin gene, Lb (leghemoglobin) [43], were decreased in LjBI-1a RNAi hairy roots, as compared to those in the control hairy roots (Figure 4C). These results suggest that LjBI-1a acts as a positive regulator in the nodulation of L. japonicus.

3.5. Suppression of Rhizobial Infection by LjBI-1a RNAi

To study rhizobial infection in LjBI-1a RNAi hairy roots, we divided the infection threads [30] into four groups based on the locations of the cells at their growing tips: (1) from curled root hairs, (2) from elongated root hairs to the root epidermis, (3) through the root cortex to the nodule primordium, and (4) nodules [33]. A lacZ-labeled strain of M. loti [38] was used to inoculate the LjBI-1a RNAi hairy roots of L. japonicus, and the IT numbers were recorded 10 days after inoculation (Figure 5). In LjBI-1a RNAi hairy roots, the average number of ITs emerging from (3) and (4) was decreased compared to those in the control, and the average number of ITs emerging from (1) and (2) did not change. These data indicate that LjBI-1a plays a positive role in rhizobial infection in the earlier stages of nodulation.

4. Discussion

The SNF system between legumes and soil rhizobia provides an environmentally friendly and sustainable source of nitrogen fertilizer, reducing dependence on industrial nitrogen fertilizers and environmental pollution, and helps drive agriculture toward a green and sustainable direction [44,45]. The balanced regulation of innate immunity plays an important role in the establishment and maintenance of an SNF system [46]. BI-1, an evolutionarily conserved cell death suppressor, participates in balancing immunity and symbiosis [47], while research on the symbiotic function of the BI-1 family genes in L. japonicus is still lacking. In this report, we identified and characterized L. japonicus BI-1 genes and, firstly, systematically studied the L. japonicus BI-1 family genes in nodulation. We also analyzed the expression patterns of these LjBI-1 genes in roots with and without inoculation of MAFF303099, and the results provided insights into the putative roles of these LjBI-1 genes in nodulation and nodule formation. The symbiotic function analysis of LjBI-1a provides useful genetic resources for improving the symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability of legumes.
BI-1 is an important apoptosis inhibitor gene that has gradually garnered attention for its role in regulating cellular apoptosis since its cloning and identification in 1998 [23]. BI-1 family genes play critical roles in cellular apoptosis regulation and plant stress tolerance, tumorigenesis, and development, as well as biological evolution and conservatism [26,30,32,47]. Despite the wide recognition of the importance of BI-1 family genes in both animals and plants, there are still relatively few studies on BI-1 family genome-wide analysis in plants [48]. This may be due to the complexity of BI-1 family genes and the differences in BI-1 genes among different species. In the present report, the entire LjBI-1 gene family was first identified and characterized in the L. japonicus genome. The peptides encoded by the 6 L. japonicus BI-1 genes contain 240–255 amino acid units, have different isoelectric points (pIs), and possess unique structural properties (Table 1). As described in the phylogenetic analysis, all three groups contain BI-1 proteins from legume plants and non-legume plants. Group C1 BI-1 genes are in a specific sub branch of legumes (Figure 1), and they have the Bax inhibitor (BI)-1 protein family motif, Integral membrane protein YbHL motif, and Conjugal transfer coupling protein TraG motif (Figure 2). These results suggest that the BI-1 genes in this special branch may be specific genes for legume nodulation and nitrogen fixation.
Previous research has indicated that BI-1 genes could participate in rhizobial infection and nodule development [32,33]. However, in L. japonicus, the specific BI-1 genes involved in nodulation and nodule development remain largely unknown. In the present work, we first comprehensively analyzed the expression profiles of LjBI-1 genes in inoculated and un-inoculated roots, and the results showed that the expressions of four genes (LjBI-1a, LjBI-1b, LjBI-1e, and LjBI-1f) were induced by rhizobial inoculation (Figure 3). These results are similar to PvBI-1a in Phaseolus vulgaris roots [32] and GmBI-1α in soybean roots [33], suggesting that these LjBI-1 genes may play roles in nodulation. Among the four above-mentioned LjBI-1 genes, LjBI-1a is also in the specific sub branch of legumes (Figure 1). We then down-regulated the transcripts of LjBI-1a by RNAi and observed that LjBI-1a promotes nodulation and nodule formation (Figure 4 and Figure 5), similar to PvBI-1a [32] and GmBI-1α [33]. The roles of LjBI-1a in nodule senescence and plant immunity and the regulation mechanism of LjBI-1a in RNS need further in-depth research.

5. Conclusions

In summary, six BI-1 family genes were identified in L. japonicus. The special characteristics of LjBI-1 genes mainly reflected in their gene sequences, pI values, protein structures, and phylogenetic analysis. The expression patterns of LjBI-1 genes in roots with and without inoculation of MAFF303099 indicated that four LjBI-1 genes might participate in nodulation. The nodulation experiment revealed that the candidate gene LjBI-1a is likely to act as a positive regulatory factor in nodulation and nodule formation. These findings provide new ideas for studying the symbiotic function of all L. japonicus BI-1 family genes, and provide useful genetic resources for improving the symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability of legumes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes16010058/s1. Figure S1. Alignments of conserved motifs of the 6 BI-1 genes in subgroup A; Figure S2. Alignments of conserved motifs of the 25 BI-1 genes in subgroup B; Figure S3. Alignments of conserved motifs of the 13 BI-1 genes in subgroup C; Table S1. Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y. and H.C.; methodology, C.L. and W.L.; software, L.L. and C.L.; validation, F.J. and D.K.; formal analysis, L.L., Q.H., C.Z. and W.L.; investigation, F.J., D.K. and S.Y.; resources, Q.H. and C.Z.; data curation, F.J., D.K. and S.Y.; writing—original draft, F.J.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.; visualization, F.J. and S.Y.; supervision, S.Y.; project administration, S.Y. and H.C.; funding acquisition, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32071964), the Key Research and Development Plan Projects of Hubei Province (2022BBA0036), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of CAAS (CAAS-0CRI-ZDRW-202402), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: U1904102). The funding body played no role in the study design, sample collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript drafting.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kopittke, P.M.; Dalal, R.C.; Finn, D.; Menzies, N.W. Global changes in soil stocks of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur as influenced by long-term agricultural production. Glob. Change Biol. 2016, 23, 2509–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, R.; Zou, J.; Han, Z.; Yu, K.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, S.; Niu, S.; Horwath, W.R.; Zhu-Barker, X. Global soil-derived ammonia emissions from agricultural nitrogen fertilizer application: A refinement based on regional and crop-specific emission factors. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 27, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tyagi, J.; Ahmad, S.; Malik, M. Nitrogenous fertilizers: Impact on environment sustainability, mitigation strategies, and challenges. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 11649–11672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, P.; Wang, E. Diversity and regulation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in plants. Curr. Biol. 2023, 33, R543–R559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Maitra, S.; Praharaj, S.; Brestic, M.; Sahoo, R.K.; Sagar, L.; Shankar, T.; Palai, J.B.; Sahoo, U.; Sairam, M.; Pramanick, B.; et al. Rhizobium as Biotechnological Tools for Green Solutions: An Environment-Friendly Approach for Sustainable Crop Production in the Modern Era of Climate Change. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 80, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, W.F.; Wang, E.T.; Ji, Z.J.; Zhang, J.J. Recent development and new insight of diversification and symbiosis specificity of legume rhizobia: Mechanism and application. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Udvardi, M.; Poole, P.S. Transport and Metabolism in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 781–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawaharada, Y.; Nielsen, M.W.; Kelly, S.; James, E.K.; Andersen, K.R.; Rasmussen, S.R.; Füchtbauer, W.; Madsen, L.H.; Heckmann, A.B.; Radutoiu, S.; et al. Differential regulation of the Epr3 receptor coordinates membrane-restricted rhizobial colonization of root nodule primordia. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Deakin, W.J.; Broughton, W.J. Symbiotic use of pathogenic strategies: Rhizobial protein secretion systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Broghammer, A.; Krusell, L.; Blaise, M.; Sauer, J.; Sullivan, J.T.; Maolanon, N.; Vinther, M.; Lorentzen, A.; Madsen, E.B.; Jensen, K.J.; et al. Legume receptors perceive the rhizobial lipochitin oligosaccharide signal molecules by direct binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13859–13864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Catoira, R.; Galera, C.; de Billy, F.; Penmetsa, R.V.; Journet, E.P.; Maillet, F.; Rosenberg, C.; Cook, D.; Gough, C.; Dénarié, J. Four genes of controlling components of a nod factor transduction pathway. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1647–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cao, Y.; Halane, M.K.; Gassmann, W.; Stacey, G. The Role of Plant Innate Immunity in the Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 535–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, J.-P.; Liang, W.; Liu, C.-W.; Xie, F.; Murray, J.D.; Chiurazzi, M. Unraveling the rhizobial infection thread. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 2235–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Quilbé, J.; Montiel, J.; Arrighi, J.-F.; Stougaard, J. Molecular Mechanisms of Intercellular Rhizobial Infection: Novel Findings of an Ancient Process. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 922982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsyganova, A.V.; Brewin, N.J.; Tsyganov, V.E. Structure and Development of the Legume-Rhizobial Symbiotic Interface in Infection Threads. Cells 2021, 10, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Montiel, J.; Reid, D.; Grønbæk, T.H.; Benfeldt, C.M.; James, E.K.; Ott, T.; Ditengou, F.A.; Nadzieja, M.; Kelly, S.; Stougaard, J. Distinct signaling routes mediate intercellular and intracellular rhizobial infection in Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol. 2021, 185, 1131–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Acosta-Jurado, S.; Rodríguez-Navarro, D.N.; Kawaharada, Y.; Perea, J.F.; Gil-Serrano, A.; Jin, H.; An, Q.; Rodríguez-Carvajal, M.A.; Andersen, S.U.; Sandal, N.; et al. Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 Invades Lotus burttii by Crack Entry in a Nod Factor–and Surface Polysaccharide–Dependent Manner. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016, 29, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grundy, E.B.; Gresshoff, P.M.; Su, H.; Ferguson, B.J. Legumes Regulate Symbiosis with Rhizobia via Their Innate Immune System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, K.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Berendsen, R.L. Beneficial microbes going underground of root immunity. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 2860–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sato, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Kaneko, T.; Asamizu, E.; Kato, T.; Nakao, M.; Sasamoto, S.; Watanabe, A.; Ono, A.; Kawashima, K.; et al. Genome Structure of the Legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2008, 15, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Guether, M.; Neuhauser, B.; Balestrini, R.; Dynowski, M.; Ludewig, U.; Bonfante, P. A Mycorrhizal-Specific Ammonium Transporter from Lotus japonicus Acquires Nitrogen Released by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lorite, M.J.; Videira e Castro, I.; Muñoz, S.; Sanjuán, J. Phylogenetic relationship of Lotus uliginosus symbionts with bradyrhizobia nodulating genistoid legumes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 79, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, Q.L.; Reed, J.C. Bax inhibitor-1, a mammalian apoptosis suppressor identified by functional screening in yeast. Mol. Cell 1998, 1, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ishikawa, T.; Watanabe, N.; Nagano, M.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Lam, E. Bax inhibitor-1: A highly conserved endoplasmic reticulum-resident cell death suppressor. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 1271–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Watanabe, N.; Lam, E. BAX Inhibitor-1 Modulates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-mediated Programmed Cell Death in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 3200–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Watanabe, N.; Lam, E. Bax Inhibitor-1, a Conserved Cell Death Suppressor, Is a Key Molecular Switch Downstream from a Variety of Biotic and Abiotic Stress Signals in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3149–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Isbat, M.; Zeba, N.; Kim, S.R.; Hong, C.B. A BAX inhibitor-1 gene in Capsicum annuum is induced under various abiotic stresses and endows multi-tolerance in transgenic tobacco. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1685–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, X.; Guo, N.; Li, S.; Duan, M.; Wang, G.; Zong, M.; Han, S.; Wu, Z.; Liu, F.; Zhang, J. Characterization of the Bax Inhibitor-1 Family in Cauliflower and Functional Analysis of BobBIL4. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, X.; Tang, C.; Huang, X.; Li, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, G.; Sun, Y.; Han, D.; Kang, Z. Wheat BAX inhibitor-1 contributes to wheat resistance to Puccinia striiformis. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 4571–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nagano, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Ogawa, Y.; Iwabuchi, M.; Nakasone, A.; Shimamoto, K.; Uchimiya, H.; Kawai-Yamada, M. Arabidopsis Bax inhibitor-1 promotes sphingolipid synthesis during cold stress by interacting with ceramide-modifying enzymes. Planta 2014, 240, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nagano, M.; Kakuta, C.; Fukao, Y.; Fujiwara, M.; Uchimiya, H.; Kawai-Yamada, M. Arabidopsis Bax inhibitor-1 interacts with enzymes related to very-long-chain fatty acid synthesis. J. Plant Res. 2019, 132, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hernández-López, A.; Díaz, M.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Guillén, G.; Sánchez, F.; Díaz-Camino, C. Uncovering Bax inhibitor-1 dual role in the legume–rhizobia symbiosis in common bean roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yuan, S.; Ke, D.; Liu, B.; Zhang, M.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Sun, S.; Shen, J.; et al. The Bax inhibitor GmBI-1α interacts with a Nod factor receptor and plays a dual role in the legume–rhizobia symbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 5820–5839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kumagai, H.; Kouchi, H. Gene Silencing by Expression of Hairpin RNA in Roots and Root Nodules. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, T.; Zhu, H.; Ke, D.X.; Cai, K.; Wang, C.; Gou, H.L.; Hong, Z.L.; Zhang, Z.M. A MAP Kinase Kinase Interacts with SymRK and Regulates Nodule Organogenesis in. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 823–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dilworth, B. Control of Leghaemoglobin Synthesis in Snake Beans. Biochem. J. 1971, 125, 4. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tansengco, M.L.; Hayashi, M.; Kawaguchi, M.; Imaizumi-Anraku, H.; Murooka, Y. crinkle, a novel symbiotic mutant that affects the infection thread growth and alters the root hair, trichome, and seed development in. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1054–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yuan, S.; Zhu, H.; Gou, H.; Fu, W.; Liu, L.; Chen, T.; Ke, D.; Kang, H.; Xie, Q.; Hong, Z.; et al. A Ubiquitin Ligase of Symbiosis Receptor Kinase Involved in Nodule Organogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gunton, J.E.; Gilmour, M.W.; Baptista, K.P.; Lawley, T.D.; Taylor, D.E. Interaction between the co-inherited TraG coupling protein and the TraJ membrane-associated protein of the H-plasmid conjugative DNA transfer system resembles chromosomal DNA translocases. Microbiology 2007, 153, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Charon, C.; Johansson, C.; Kondorosi, E.; Kondorosi, A.; Crespi, M. enod40 induces dedifferentiation and division of root cortical cells in legumes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 8901–8906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Schauser, L.; Roussis, A.; Stiller, J.; Stougaard, J. A plant regulator controlling development of symbiotic root nodules. Nature 1999, 402, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, J.Y.; Bisseling, T. Evolution of NIN and NIN-like Genes in Relation to Nodule Symbiosis. Genes 2020, 11, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kundu, S.; Hargrove, M.S. Distal heme pocket regulation of ligand binding and stability in soybean leghemoglobin. Proteins 2003, 50, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Broughton, W.J.; Zhang, F.; Perret, X.; Staehelin, C. Signals exchanged between legumes and agricultural uses and perspectives. Plant Soil 2003, 252, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Le Roux, J.J.; Mavengere, N.R.; Ellis, A.G. The structure of legume-rhizobium interaction networks and their response to tree invasions. Aob Plants 2016, 8, plw038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yuan, S.; Leng, P.; Feng, Y.; Jin, F.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Shan, Z.; Yang, Z.; Hao, Q.; et al. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses provide new insight into symbiotic host specificity. iScience 2024, 27, 110207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Babaeizad, V.; Imani, J.; Kogel, K.-H.; Eichmann, R.; Hückelhoven, R. Over-expression of the cell death regulator BAX inhibitor-1 in barley confers reduced or enhanced susceptibility to distinct fungal pathogens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 118, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Henke, N.; Lisak, D.A.; Schneider, L.; Habicht, J.; Pergande, M.; Methner, A. The ancient cell death suppressor BAX inhibitor-1. Cell Calcium 2011, 50, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the BI-1 gene family in L. japonicus, Glycine max, Oryza sativa, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Medicago truncatula. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA version 11.0 with a JTT + G model and 1000 bootstrap replicates. The tree divided these BI-1 proteins into three major groups (Group A to Group C) with different colors. The green, pink, and cyan colors represent the A–C groups, respectively. The different shapes in blue indicate different species. The red font represents subgroup C1: 9 legume plant BI-1 genes.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the BI-1 gene family in L. japonicus, Glycine max, Oryza sativa, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Medicago truncatula. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA version 11.0 with a JTT + G model and 1000 bootstrap replicates. The tree divided these BI-1 proteins into three major groups (Group A to Group C) with different colors. The green, pink, and cyan colors represent the A–C groups, respectively. The different shapes in blue indicate different species. The red font represents subgroup C1: 9 legume plant BI-1 genes.
Genes 16 00058 g001
Figure 2. Alignments of the conserved motifs of the 9 BI-1 genes in subgroup C1. The red, green, and blue boxes are the main retention patterns. The red line represents the Bax inhibitor (BI)-1 protein family motif; the green dashed line represents the Integral membrane protein YbhL motif; and within the blue box is the Conjugal transfer coupling protein TraG motif.
Figure 2. Alignments of the conserved motifs of the 9 BI-1 genes in subgroup C1. The red, green, and blue boxes are the main retention patterns. The red line represents the Bax inhibitor (BI)-1 protein family motif; the green dashed line represents the Integral membrane protein YbhL motif; and within the blue box is the Conjugal transfer coupling protein TraG motif.
Genes 16 00058 g002
Figure 3. Expression profile of LjBI-1 genes in L. japonicus roots with and without Rhizobium MAFF303099 inoculation at three post-inoculation time points. (A) LjBI-1a (B) LjBI-1b (C) LjBI-1c (D) LjBI-1d (E) LjBI-1e (F) LjBI-1f. The control (un-inoculated) and inoculated roots at 6 h, 30 h, and 3 d post-inoculation were used to extract RNA, and the specific primers of the six LjBI-1 genes were utilized to perform qPCR. The expression levels of 6 LjBI-1 genes were detected using three biological replicate samples. qPCR was used to obtain the relative expression levels of each LjBI-1 gene, which were then normalized to the average expression level of the L. japonicus reference gene QACT. The expression levels in un-inoculated roots at the same time point were used as the controls for calculation. These results represent the mean ± SD of three independent biological repetitions. Asterisks represent significant differences, as determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01; * 0.01 < p < 0.05; ns: p > 0.05).
Figure 3. Expression profile of LjBI-1 genes in L. japonicus roots with and without Rhizobium MAFF303099 inoculation at three post-inoculation time points. (A) LjBI-1a (B) LjBI-1b (C) LjBI-1c (D) LjBI-1d (E) LjBI-1e (F) LjBI-1f. The control (un-inoculated) and inoculated roots at 6 h, 30 h, and 3 d post-inoculation were used to extract RNA, and the specific primers of the six LjBI-1 genes were utilized to perform qPCR. The expression levels of 6 LjBI-1 genes were detected using three biological replicate samples. qPCR was used to obtain the relative expression levels of each LjBI-1 gene, which were then normalized to the average expression level of the L. japonicus reference gene QACT. The expression levels in un-inoculated roots at the same time point were used as the controls for calculation. These results represent the mean ± SD of three independent biological repetitions. Asterisks represent significant differences, as determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01; * 0.01 < p < 0.05; ns: p > 0.05).
Genes 16 00058 g003
Figure 4. Nodulation phenotype of LjBI-1a RNAi in L. japonicus. (A) Photographed images representing the hairy root systems expressing the empty vector (control), LjBI-1a RNAi-1, and LjBI-1a RNAi-2. Photographs were taken 30 days after inoculation with M. loti MAFF303099, and plants were grown without nitrogen fertilizer. Bars = 10 mm. Mean number of nodules (B), mean root length (C), and mean root fresh weight (D) per plant with standard deviation (SD) of L. japonicus expressing the empty vector (control), LjBI-1a RNAi-1, and LjBI-1a RNAi-2 at 30 days post-inoculation with M. loti. (E) qPCR analysis of transcript levels of LjBI-1a, NIN, Enod40, and Lb in the control, LjBI-1a RNAi-1, and LjBI-1a RNAi-2 hairy roots. These results represent the mean ± SD of three independent biological repetitions. Asterisks represent significant differences, as determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01; * 0.01 < p < 0.05; ns: p > 0.05).
Figure 4. Nodulation phenotype of LjBI-1a RNAi in L. japonicus. (A) Photographed images representing the hairy root systems expressing the empty vector (control), LjBI-1a RNAi-1, and LjBI-1a RNAi-2. Photographs were taken 30 days after inoculation with M. loti MAFF303099, and plants were grown without nitrogen fertilizer. Bars = 10 mm. Mean number of nodules (B), mean root length (C), and mean root fresh weight (D) per plant with standard deviation (SD) of L. japonicus expressing the empty vector (control), LjBI-1a RNAi-1, and LjBI-1a RNAi-2 at 30 days post-inoculation with M. loti. (E) qPCR analysis of transcript levels of LjBI-1a, NIN, Enod40, and Lb in the control, LjBI-1a RNAi-1, and LjBI-1a RNAi-2 hairy roots. These results represent the mean ± SD of three independent biological repetitions. Asterisks represent significant differences, as determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01; * 0.01 < p < 0.05; ns: p > 0.05).
Genes 16 00058 g004
Figure 5. IT numbers at each infection stage in hairy roots ten days after Rhizobium inoculation. Empty vector served as control. Each root system was analyzed using twenty roots with lengths of 4–6 cm.
Figure 5. IT numbers at each infection stage in hairy roots ten days after Rhizobium inoculation. Empty vector served as control. Each root system was analyzed using twenty roots with lengths of 4–6 cm.
Genes 16 00058 g005
Table 1. Detailed information on Lotus japonicus Bax inhibitor-1 (BI-1) family genes.
Table 1. Detailed information on Lotus japonicus Bax inhibitor-1 (BI-1) family genes.
NameGene IDChromosome Location Transcript NumbersProtein Size (aa) MW (kDa)PISignal PeptideExonIntron
LjBI-1aLj0g3v0072129chr4:34395727-34398462124927651.198.85 0.0210%43
LjBI-1bLj1g3v4447000chr1:10917466-10919589124026873.158.90 0.1240%43
LjBI-1cLj2g3v1989060chr2:1184961-1187596224627291.959.26 0.0390%65
LjBI-1dLj5g3v1003620chr5:24312170-24315258124227075.236.55 0.1410%43
LjBI-1eLj5g3v2183610chr5:2502444-2504025124027101.317.65 0.0210%43
LjBI-1fLj6g3v1888050chr6:52345422-52347607125528373.346.41 0.2280%43
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, F.; Ke, D.; Lu, L.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Liang, W.; Yuan, S.; Chen, H. Suppression of Nodule Formation by RNAi Knock-Down of Bax inhibitor-1a in Lotus japonicus. Genes 2025, 16, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16010058

AMA Style

Jin F, Ke D, Lu L, Hu Q, Zhang C, Li C, Liang W, Yuan S, Chen H. Suppression of Nodule Formation by RNAi Knock-Down of Bax inhibitor-1a in Lotus japonicus. Genes. 2025; 16(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16010058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Fuxiao, Danxia Ke, Lu Lu, Qianqian Hu, Chanjuan Zhang, Chao Li, Wanwan Liang, Songli Yuan, and Haifeng Chen. 2025. "Suppression of Nodule Formation by RNAi Knock-Down of Bax inhibitor-1a in Lotus japonicus" Genes 16, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16010058

APA Style

Jin, F., Ke, D., Lu, L., Hu, Q., Zhang, C., Li, C., Liang, W., Yuan, S., & Chen, H. (2025). Suppression of Nodule Formation by RNAi Knock-Down of Bax inhibitor-1a in Lotus japonicus. Genes, 16(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16010058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop