Next Article in Journal
Genetic Lesions in Russian CLL Patients with the Most Common Stereotyped Antigen Receptors
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Insights of Alnus-Infective Frankia Strains Reveal Unique Genetic Features and New Evidence on Their Host-Restricted Lifestyle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/genes14020531
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of phi112, a Molecular Marker Tightly Linked to the o2 Gene of Maize, and Its Utilization in Multiplex PCR for Differentiating Normal Maize from QPM

by
Alla Singh
1,*,
Chikkappa Karjagi
2,
Sehgeet Kaur
3,
Gagan Jeet
3,
Deepak Bhamare
1,
Sonu Gupta
1,
Sunil Kumar
1,
Abhijit Das
1,
Mamta Gupta
1,
D. P. Chaudhary
1,
Bharat Bhushan
1,
B. S. Jat
1,
Ramesh Kumar
1,
M. C. Dagla
1 and
Manoj Kumar
4
1
ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, P.A.U. Campus, Ludhiana 141004, India
2
ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Pusa Campus, Delhi 110012, India
3
School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India
4
ICAR—Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(2), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020531
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 17 February 2023 / Published: 20 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Quality Protein Maize (QPM) contains higher amounts of essential amino acids lysine and tryptophan. The QPM phenotype is based on regulating zein protein synthesis by opaque2 transcription factor. Many gene modifiers act to optimize the amino acid content and agronomic performance. An SSR marker, phi112, is present upstream of the opaque2 DNA gene. Its analysis has shown the presence of transcription factor activity. The functional associations of opaque2 have been determined. The putative transcription factor binding at phi112 marked DNA was identified through computational analysis. The present study is a step towards understanding the intricate network of molecular interactions that fine-tune the QPM genotype to influence maize protein quality. In addition, a multiplex PCR assay for differentiation of QPM from normal maize is shown, which can be used for Quality Control at various stages of the QPM value chain.

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important global crop that finds applications in various sectors, including food, feed and energy [1,2,3]. Maize is considered a potential solution for crop diversification of rice-based cropping systems to bring ecological sustainability into farming models. Cereal crops are the only source of nutrition for the vast majority of the world’s population. In South-East Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, the most important grains are wheat, rice, and maize. Cereals have a low protein content. As a result, communities that rely primarily on grains for their nutritional requirements suffer from protein deficiency. Maize contributes around 15% to global protein consumption; however, maize proteins have a low nutritional value [4]. Maize proteins are deficient in essential amino acids such as lysine, tryptophan, and methionine. The main proteins in maize grain include zeins and glutelins, together with relatively small quantities of albumins and globulins. Zein proteins are involved in the formation of protein bodies in the endosperm of maize seeds. These protein bodies provide hardness to the endosperm, resulting in hard flint and dent grains, which are liked by farmers due to excellent post-harvest storage properties. Zein proteins are divided into four classes based on their function: α, β, γ and δ. Zein proteins do not contain any lysine, with the exception of δ-zeins, which contains one lysine codon. In the 1920s, a naturally occurring mutant of maize, opaque-2, was found in the USA that had soft endosperm [5]. In 1961, it was found that homozygous o2 maize has higher levels of lysine and tryptophan [6]. Since then, many more mutants have been found such as floury-2, Mucronate, Defective Endosperm 30, etc., but opaque-2 was taken further with great enthusiasm. The increase in protein quality that includes high lysine and tryptophan content resulted from an increase in the proportion of non-zein proteins concomitant with a decrease in the proportion of zein proteins in the opaque-2 endosperm. However, selection for maize mutants containing high lysine and high tryptophan content has resulted in negative pleiotropic effects, of which the most significant is the formation of a soft maize endosperm, prone to various diseases and poor yield and agronomic performance. In opaque mutants of maize, the o2 function is compromised, leading to less zein synthesis, especially α-zein synthesis, followed by simultaneous synthesis of higher nutritional quality non-zein proteins that raise the nutritional status. The absence of particular zein proteins leads to smaller protein bodies, thus affecting the starch packing, which together leads to soft kernels and renders the kernel prone to post-harvest infections.
The discovery of the nutritional superiority of opaque2 (o2) maize mutants due to elevated levels of lysine and tryptophan has opened a new opportunity to improve the cereal protein quality [7]. Since then, extensive studies on opaque2 (O2) gene have led to an understanding of the genetic, molecular and biochemical basis of the O2 gene. One of the finest outcomes of the several efforts directed towards the improvement of protein quality in maize is the hard endosperm o2 genotypes, most commonly referred to as Quality Protein Maize (QPM) [8]. The nutritional superiority of QPM over normal wild-type maize can alleviate childhood malnutrition in maize-consuming, low-income countries. Apart from higher protein quality, based on sensory characteristics also, QPM has good consumer acceptance and, in some cases, is preferred over normal maize [9]. The QPM phenotype (increased lysine and tryptophan coupled change with change in kernel traits) is controlled by the molecular function of o2 transcription factor. It regulates the synthesis of zein proteins, which impart hardness to the maize kernel and several other genes involved in protein folding, stress response, etc.
To solve the problems associated with opaque-2 maize, research efforts were pioneered at CIMMYT. A conservative approach was followed to maintain protein and grain quality simultaneously. The work was undertaken on two genetic systems, opaque-2 and endosperm modifier genes. Focus was directed on selecting endosperm modifications in opaque-2 maize to restore grain quality with the help of plant breeding. The new, improved varieties of opaque-2 were called Quality Protein Maize (QPM). In QPM, the increased amino acid content and kernel hardness are in balance, offering higher nutrition and good agronomic performance. Thereafter, quantitative trait loci associated with endosperm modification were located and molecular mechanisms behind improved protein quality were deciphered [10,11]. Protocols for the assessment of grain quality and the progress of breeding efforts were standardized. The endosperm modifiers were found to primarily influence the synthesis and spatial distribution of α-zein [12]. Holding [13] studied the organization of zein proteins at different stages of protein body formation in the endosperm. Li et al. [14] revealed structural variations in the genome of a South African QPM line K0326Y through long-read sequencing. Molecular studies to characterize the genetic systems concerning protein quality have been carried out in the last decade. Hunter and coworkers performed a microarray analysis of the changes brought about by the opaque-2 mutations [15]. They have reported alterations in gene regulation of around 236 genes. These genes span various pathways and cell structures, such as amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, cytoskeleton, membrane transport, protein turnover and oil metabolism, etc. Many factors involved in transcription and translation, molecular chaperones, signal transduction and secondary metabolism have also been reported in the above microarray analysis. Li et al. [14] have provided a comprehensive overview of the cellular changes during QPM development. The authors demonstrated that ATP availability is an important parameter in endosperm development. Inside the maize endosperm, glycolysis is the main pathway for the generation of ATP. Normal functioning of starch biosynthesis, normal zein function, endoplasmic reticulum and ATP availability result in vitreous endosperm. However, in o2, the above functions are disrupted. The enzymatic activity of Pyruvate Phosphate dikinase is reduced, which affects glycolysis and limits the availability of ATP. Together with this, starch biosynthesis activity also reduces. This impacts the complexation of starch and protein bodies, resulting in soft endosperm in o2 maize. In QPM, the starch biosynthesis and glycolysis pathway are rescued, leading to a relatively hard kernel with improved amino acid characteristics. Gibbon and Larkins [16] have reviewed molecular genetic approaches for improvement in maize protein quality. Zhan et al. [17] analyzed the 186 putative direct and 1677 indirect targets of O2 transcription activity. These include genes involved in nutrient reservoir activity, transcription and translation-related functions, protein serine/threonine kinase activation and protein phosphorylation.
Transgenic techniques have also been used to improve maize protein quality. Monsanto developed the LY038 transgenic maize line, which has higher amounts of lysine in the grain. This maize line contains a dihydrodipicolinate synthase enzyme (DHDPS) derived from Corynebacterium glutamicum. The bacterial DHDPS has reduced feedback inhibition in lysine synthesis, allowing lysine to accumulate in the cellular amino acid pool. Huang and team [18] have used an RNAi approach to reduce the levels of α-zeins, leading to an increase in lysine and tryptophan content. The porcine α-lactalbumin was used to increase protein quality in maize [19]. Yu et al. [20] have used a high lysine-rich protein, sb401, from potato to make maize transgenics. The transgenics displayed higher proportions of lysine and tryptophan. Yue et al. [21] used cotton protein GhLRP, Chang et al. [22] used AtMAP18 of Arabidopsis thaliana and Liu et al. [23] used microtubule-associated protein SBgLR to enhance maize protein quality. The agronomic performance of transgenic maize was similar to normal maize. Wang et al. [24] transformed SBgLR from potato and TSRF1 from tomato to make transgenic maize that displayed increased nutritive quality and resistance to salt stress. However, QPM is a naturally biofortified product and hence, its reach covers non-GM areas as well. In addition, it is a potential candidate for hidden hunger eradication in many parts of the world, where maize is already a staple diet.
Several QPM hybrids have been released commercially. However, it is realized that commercialization of QPM produce requires its rapid differentiation from normal maize. Many physiological and biochemical processes influence the plant type and traits during development and senescence [25,26]. Rapid detection protocols have been designed for several traits in plants, including amylose [27], photosynthetic parameters [28], plant viruses [29], prediction of nitrogen use efficiency [30], etc. The protein-level differences of QPM from normal maize have been elucidated [31,32]. An optimized protocol for measuring the protein quality of maize was described [33], which measures tryptophan and protein in a shorter period. To enable commercialization, it is envisaged that an alternative test that supplements the protocol described by [33] will be useful. The advances in understanding the molecular basis of the o2 gene have identified the key sequence differences in wild-type genes and the molecular markers that co-segregate with the o2 gene. Three molecular markers that differentiate QPM (o2) from normal maize (O2) are umc1066, phi057 and phi112. These are sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers. Out of the three markers, umc1066 and phi057 are codominant, and phi112 is dominant (present in normal and absent in QPM/opaque genotypes). The presence/absence variation of phi112 can be exploited to fabricate molecular tests for differentiating QPM from normal maize. The gross polymorphism, in the form of presence/absence variation, makes phi112 an interesting candidate for further analysis. In the present study, the phi112 marked DNA in maize was characterized and used to determine the genetic nature of one of the differences between QPM and normal maize. This study also shows the computational functional characterization of the DNA and its putatively interacting protein. This is important to decipher the intricate molecular network that governs the QPM phenotype and maintains a balance between nutrition and agronomy in maize. Its understanding is essential to devise breeding strategies based on gene modifier function, along with introgression of opaque2 alleles in elite maize germplasm.
Since maize is a cross-pollinated crop and protein quality mediated by o2 is a recessive trait, it is important to conduct Quality Control of the QPM produce. The development of a genetic differentiation assay is expected to help segregate QPM from normal maize, thus enabling higher remuneration of the QPM produce and objectivity in various steps of the value chain. A multiplex PCR assay based on phi112 has been developed to differentiate QPM from normal maize in the present study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sequence Retrieval

The sequences of Zea mays opaque2 and prolamine-box binding factor (PBF1) transcription factors were retrieved from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Basic local alignment was performed using the BLASTN module. Forward and Reverse primer sequences for phi112 STMS were taken from the MaizeGDB database [34]. The expression profiles of Pbf1 and Dof1 were also taken from the MaizeGDB database.

2.2. DNA Motif Discovery

The motifs in phi112 marked DNA were predicted using the MEME suite of search algorithms [35,36]. Gene ontology identification was performed using the Arabidopsis thaliana (Plant) database through the Gene Ontology for Motifs (GOMo) module.

2.3. Protein Interaction Analysis

Functional associations in the form of interacting proteins were identified using the STRING web server [37].

2.4. Generation of a Homology Model of Zea Mays PBF1

The homology model of Zea mays PBF1 transcription factor was generated using the SWISS-MODEL program [38].

2.5. Elucidation of Protein–DNA Interaction

The interaction of the PBF1 partial sequence with target DNA was elucidated using a hybrid algorithm of template-based modeling and ab initio-free docking, employed in the HDOCK program [39,40]. Polar contacts between protein and DNA were determined using the PyMol program (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.2r3pre, Schrödinger, LLC).

2.6. PCR Amplification

The DNA of normal maize line MIL 10-378 and QPM line MIL 10–63 was extracted by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method [41]. A total of 1 µL of two concentrations of genomic DNA, viz., 10 and 20 ng/µL, each of normal and QPM genomic DNA, were used in a 20 µL PCR for amplification using 2X premix containing Ta Polymerase, dNTP mixture and buffer. The primers phi112 and phi217698 were used individually and in combination in multiplex reactions on normal maize and QPM DNA. The PCR cycle conditions for amplification were as follows: denaturation at 95 °C, annealing at 58 °C and extension at 72 °C, for a total of 30 cycles. The PCR product was loaded on 2% agarose gel and visualized using Gel Documentation System.

3. Results and Discussion

The presence/absence variation provided by the phi112 marker, which differentiates normal maize from QPM, makes it a good candidate for designing molecular tests to understand the underlying mechanism. Being close to the opaque2 gene, a transcription factor involved in the QPM phenotype, analysis of phi112 marked DNA is important to determine the mechanism of its influence over maize phenotype. Using phi112 Forward and Reverse sequence, the intervening DNA sequence was retrieved using Zea mays genome (taxid: 4577). This intervening DNA, along with phi112 primer sequences, was termed ‘phi112 marked DNA’, which is 152 base pairs long (Figure 1A). The phi112-marked DNA was scanned for DNA motifs using the MEME Motif Discovery module [33,34]. Three motifs were discovered, out of which Gene Ontology identification using the Arabidopsis thaliana (Plant) database revealed transcription factor activity in one motif TCTTCTTT (shown in green in Figure 1A). This indicated that TCTTCTTT could be one of the regions associated with a transcription factor. However, as the discovered motif was identified based on the A. thaliana database, it was necessary to confirm if it also functions in maize. Thus, interaction analysis of the motif-containing DNA with its putative transcription factor protein is desired.
To find the putative transcription factor of the tightly regulated opaque2 system, functional associations of the opaque2 transcription factor were elucidated using the STRING database (Figure 1B). The database predicts functional associations based on experimental techniques such as co-expression or text-mining. A transcription factor, PBF1, was found to be functionally associated with opaque2 with a high probability (score = 0.780) as shown in Figure 1C. PBF1 is also associated with proteins such as δ-zein and ribosome-inactivating protein b-32 (Figure 1B).
PBF1 is a prolamin box-binding factor-1 protein. It has been found to bind to P-box DNA sequences in the promoter regions of 19 kDa and 22 kDa zein proteins [42]. It also binds to 27 kDa zein protein, albeit with lower affinity. In the later stages of seed development, PBF1 is thought to interact with other proteins and has been proposed as a ‘recruiter’ of the Opaque2 transcription factor [42]. We wanted to ascertain if PBF1 can bind to the transcription factor associated motif in phi112-marked DNA. Apart from the PBF1 protein, a class of proteins referred to as Dof, containing zinc-finger motifs, has been found to bind the Pbox region of zeins [43]. Dof-domain proteins play a role in transcription activation or repression in diverse plant phenomena [44]. However, the STRING server results denote the Pbf1 gene as Dof zinc finger protein PBF. It has been shown that PBF1 does not contain Dof motifs as it does not bind zinc [42]. To remove any ambiguity, we searched the MaizeGDB database for expression profiling of Dof1 and PBF1 proteins (Figure 2). Therefore, we used the Pbf1 sequence for further DNA–protein interaction analysis.
To further characterize the PBF1 protein, it was modeled via an automated homology algorithm. It showed a 17.39% sequence identity with endothelial transcription factor GATA-2, deposited as 509B entry in Protein Data Bank [45]. The structure has a Global Model Quality Estimation (GMQE) and QMEAN score of 0.34 and −3.98, respectively. Though the modeled structure is partial, its identity with transcription factor confirmed the possibility of DNA binding activity. To find the possibility of Zea mays PBF1 binding to the phi112 marked DNA and to elucidate the potential binding site in DNA, a longer sequence of 48 nucleotides, spanning 20 nucleotides on the sides of TCTTCTTT DNA sequence (marked in yellow in Figure 1A) was taken further for analysis. The PBF1–DNA interaction was analyzed via a hybrid docking algorithm utilizing template-based modeling and ab initio free docking (Figure 3A). It was found that PBF1 binds partially with the computationally discovered motif TCTTCTTT. The DNA motif that interacts with PBF1 is CTTCTTT (Figure 3B). Both the sense and antisense strand nucleotides interact with amino acids in PBF1. The region of the PBF1 transcription factor that interacts with DNA is a helix, and its position is shown in Figure 3C. The protein motif that interacts with DNA is Lys-Ala-Cys-Arg-Arg-TyrTrp-Thr-His-Gly-Gly-Leu (amino acids). Tyrosine 93 and Threonine 99 interact with the sense strand of DNA, while Lysine 81, Arginine 91, Threonine 95 and Histidine 96 interact with nucleotides on the antisense DNA strand.
The use of a longer DNA sequence as a query for DNA–protein interaction and the localization of interaction in the discovered motif indicate that the PBF1 transcription factor can bind the phi112 marked DNA at motif CTTCTTT. Therefore, phi112 marked DNA has transcription factor activity. The presence/absence variation of phi112 marked DNA implicates its strong role in determining the normal versus QPM phenotype.
To design an alternative protocol for determining the genetic makeup of the sample, a multiplex PCR was designed. Firstly, the normal maize and QPM were amplified using phi213984, phi112 and phi057 (Figure 4A). While phi213984 resulted in an identical amplicon of size 306 bp in both normal maize and QPM, phi112 amplified only the normal maize (size 155 bp), and phi057 resulted in size polymorphism (145 bp in normal maize and 165 bp in QPM). Then, both the phi213984 and phi112 were used together in multiplex format (Figure 4B). In normal maize, the phi213984 and phi112 resulted in respective products, whereas in QPM, only phi213984 resulted in the amplicon.
Given that protein quality is a commercial trait with immense financial implications, it is imperative to design standards and Quality Control parameters for high protein quality. As depicted in Figure 5A, two stages are critical in the case of maize. One is at the stage of planting, where it is important to ensure the absence of seed counterfeiting and that the QPM genotype is authentic. Due to the recessive nature of the trait, the authentication of seed at the genotype level is essential. Figure 5B provides a schematic representation of the models arising from information generated in the present work. PBF1 appears to be the master regulator for protein quality in maize by influencing the expression of the O2 transcription factor, which in turn is known to influence the expression of zein proteins and the overall nutritional status. In addition to this, the second critical stage is flowering. Pollen dispersal from nearby fields of normal maize can downgrade the quality of the presumed QPM produce. Therefore, it is necessary to check the quality of grain also. Figure 5C depicts the two commonly used tests, viz., colorimetry and high-performance liquid chromatography. These tests can take 2-5 days for laboratory analysis depending on different features of the protocol [46,47,48]. Recently, we designed a rapid protocol for differentiating normal maize from QPM at the grain stage. The developed protocol is under application for patent protection. This rapid protocol was successfully deployed to differentiate food products made from normal maize from those prepared from QPM [49]. The multiplex PCR assay based on the use of phi112 as a dominant marker for protein quality differentiation can be used as a supplement or a standalone test to screen for high protein quality material to enable differentiation of the bulk samples and aggregation of the QPM material. In case of any ambiguity in ascertaining the nature of the material being tested, its genetic makeup can be confirmed using the described PCR assay, in addition to its purity. Hence, the multiplex PCR for maize protein quality differentiation demonstrated here is a step towards ensuring higher remuneration for the QPM growers, which in turn would result in the supply of nutritious food products for health-aware consumers. The PCR assay, along with rapid protocols for grain-based testing can be incorporated into Standard Operating Protocols of farmers/Farmer Producer Organizations for end-to-end Quality Control of the QPM production chain. Given the well-defined protocols for conversion of elite germplasm to o2 and its subsequent development as QPM [50,51], it is expected that the market of biofortified maize will increase manifold in the coming times. SSR markers have been demonstrated to be a more cost-effective method than conventional methods for breeding, which, however, must be determined on a case-to-case basis [52]. The developed assay and the understanding of the mechanism reported herein will pave the way for further research in this direction.

4. Conclusions

The present study is the computational characterization of the phi112 marked DNA and its putative transcription factor protein. Based on the results obtained, the ‘recruiting’ function of PBF1 may include protein–protein interactions as well as transcription of the o2 gene. The insight generated in this study can be taken forward to unravel the molecular network governing opaque2 function and its exploitation for increasing maize’s essential amino acid content. Further, it will also help to envisage the possible use of gene editing techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 to selectively modify the precise region to bring desirable changes in the phenotype without many associated undesirable effects. Given the documented benefits of QPM [53] and its potential market in the nutrition and health sector, it is imperative that enabling technologies are defined to allow its unambiguous differentiation for developing premium seed supply chains.

Author Contributions

A.S. and C.K. conceptualized the idea. A.S., S.K. (Sunil Kumar), G.J. and M.G. performed the bioinformatics analysis. D.B., S.G., A.S., A.D. and R.K. standardized the multiplex PCR. A.S., B.B. and B.J. wrote the original draft. M.K., S.K. (Sehgeet Kaurand), D.C. and M.D. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.S. acknowledges the funding received from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (Grant No.: SP/YO/217/2018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

All the authors acknowledge the support received from ICAR for the above work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Rouf Shah, T.; Prasad, K.; Kumar, P. Maize—A potential source of human nutrition and health: A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2016, 2, 1166995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kaul, J.; Jain, K.; Olakh, D. An Overview on Role of Yellow Maize in Food, Feed and Nutrition Security. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2019, 8, 3037–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Choudhary, M.; Singh, A.; Gupta, M.; Rakshit, S. Enabling technologies for utilization of maize as a bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2020, 14, 402–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nuss, E.T.; Tanumihardjo, S.A. Maize: A Paramount Staple Crop in the Context of Global Nutrition. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 417–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vietmeyer, N.D. A drama in three long acts: The story behind the story of the development of quality-protein maize. Diversity 2000, 16, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mertz, E.T.; Bates, L.S.; Nelson, O.E. Mutant Gene That Changes Protein Composition and Increases Lysine Content of Maize Endosperm. Science 1964, 145, 279–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Azevedo, R.A.; Arruda, P. High-lysine maize: The key discoveries that have made it possible. Amino Acids 2010, 39, 979–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vasal, S.K. The Quality Protein Maize Story. Food Nutr. Bull. 2000, 21, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. De Groote, H.; Gunaratna, N.S.; Okuro, J.O.; Wondimu, A.; Chege, C.K.; Tomlins, K. Consumer acceptance of quality protein maize (QPM) in East Africa. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 3201–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Li, C.; Qiao, Z.; Qi, W.; Wang, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, X.; Tang, Y.; Mei, B.; Lv, Y.; Zhao, H.; et al. Genome-Wide Characterization of cis-Acting DNA Targets Reveals the Transcriptional Regulatory Framework of Opaque2 in Maize. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lopes, M.A.; Takasaki, K.; Bostwick, D.E.; Helentjaris, T.; Larkins, B.A. Identification of two opaque2 modifier loci in Quality Protein Maize. Mol. Genet. Genom. 1995, 247, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Geetha, K.B.; Lending, C.R.; Lopes, M.A.; Wallace, J.C.; Larkins, B.A. Opaque-2 modifiers increase α-zein synthesis and alter its spatial distribution in maize endosperm. Plant Cell. 1991, 3, 1207–1219. [Google Scholar]
  13. Holding, D.R. Recent advances in the study of prolamin storage protein organization and function. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Li, C.; Xiang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; An, D.; Dong, J.; Zhao, C.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; et al. Long-read sequencing reveals genomic structural variations that underlie creation of quality protein maize. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hunter, B.G.; Beatty, M.K.; Singletary, G.W.; Hamaker, B.R.; Dilkes, B.P.; Larkins, B.A.; Jung, R. Maize Opaque Endosperm Mutations Create Extensive Changes in Patterns of Gene Expression. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2591–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gibbon, B.C.; Larkins, B.A. Molecular genetic approaches to developing quality protein maize. Trends Genet. 2005, 21, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhan, J.; Li, G.; Ryu, C.H.; Ma, C.; Zhang, S.; Lloyd, A.; Hunter, B.G.; Larkins, B.A.; Drews, G.N.; Wang, X.; et al. Opaque-2 regulates a complex gene network associated with cell differentiation and storage functions of maize endosperm. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2425–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Huang, S.; Frizzi, A.; Florida, C.A.; Kruger, D.E.; Luethy, M.H. High Lysine and High Tryptophan Transgenic Maize Resulting from the Reduction of Both 19- and 22-kD α-zeins. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bicar, E.H.; Woodman-Clikeman, W.; Sangtong, V.; Peterson, J.M.; Yang, S.S.; Lee, M.; Scott, M.P. Transgenic maize endosperm containing a milk protein has improved amino acid balance. Transgenic Res. 2008, 17, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yu, J.; Peng, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Zhy, D.; Sun, X.; Liu, J.; Ao, G. Seed-specific expression of a lysine rich protein sb401 gene significantly increases both lysine and total protein content in maize seeds. Mol. Breed. 2004, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yue, J.; Li, C.; Zhao, Q.; Zhu, D.; Yu, J. Seed-specific expression of a lysine-rich protein gene, GhLRP, from cotton significantly increases the lysine content in maize seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 5350–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chang, Y.; Shen, E.; Wen, L.; Yu, J.; Zhu, D.; Zhao, Q. Seed-Specific Expression of the Arabidopsis AtMAP18 Gene Increases both Lysine and Total Protein Content in Maize. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, C.; Li, S.; Yue, J.; Xiao, W.; Zhao, Q.; Zhu, D.; Yu, J. Microtubule-Associated Protein SBgLR Facilitates Storage Protein Deposition and Its Expression Leads to Lysine Content Increase in Transgenic Maize Endosperm. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 29772–29786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, M.; Liu, C.; Li, S.; Zhu, D.; Zhao, Q.; Yu, J. Improved nutritive quality and salt resistance intransgenic maize by simultaneously overexpression of a natural lysine-rich protein gene, SBgLR, and an ERF transcription factor gene, TSRF1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9459–9474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Nerling, D.; Coelho, C.M.M.; Brümmer, A. Biochemical profiling and its role in physiological quality of maize seeds. J. Seed Sci. 2018, 40, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yadava, P.; Singh, A.; Kumar, K.; Sapna; Singh, I. Plant Senescence and Agriculture. In Senescence Signalling and Control in Plants, 1st ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2019; pp. 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dhir, A.; Kaur, C.; Devi, V.; Singh, A.; Das, A.K.; Rakshit, S.; Chaudhary, D.P. A Rapid Single Kernel Screening Method for Preliminary Estimation of Amylose in Maize. Food Anal. Methods 2022, 15, 2163–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Meacham-Hensold, K.; Fu, P.; Wu, J.; Serbin, S.; Montes, C.M.; Ainsworth, E.; Guan, K.; Dracup, E.; Pederson, T.; Driever, S.; et al. Plot-level rapid screening for photosynthetic parameters using proximal hyperspectral imaging. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2312–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tembo, M.; Adediji, A.O.; Bouvaine, S.; Chikoti, P.C.; Seal, S.E.; Silva, G. A quick and sensitive diagnostic tool for detection of Maize streak virus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Tao, X.; Chen, X.; Li, X. Rapid prediction of winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency using consumer-grade unmanned aerial vehicles multispectral imagery. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1032170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sethi, M.; Kumar, S.; Singh, A.; Chaudhary, D.P. Temporal profiling of essential amino acids in developing maize kernel of normal, opaque-2 and QPM germplasm. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sethi, M.; Singh, A.; Kaur, H.; Phagna, R.K.; Rakshit, S.; Chaudhary, D.P. Expression profile of protein fractions in the developing kernel of normal, Opaque-2 and quality protein maize. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaur, C.; Singh, A.; Sethi, M.; Devi, V.; Chaudhary, D.P.; Phagna, R.K.; Langyan, S.; Bhushan, B.; Rakshit, S. Optimization of Protein Quality Assay in Normal, opaque-2, and Quality Protein Maize. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 6, 743019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Harper, L.; Gardiner, J.; Andorf, C.; Lawrence, C.J. MaizeGDB: The Maize Genetics and Genomics Database. Plant Bioinform. Methods Protoc. 2016, 1374, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Suppl. S2), w202–w208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39–W49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Snel, B.; Lehmann, G.; Bork, P.; Huynen, M.A. STRING: A web-server to retrieve and display the repeatedly occurring neighbourhood of a gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 3442–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Waterhouse, A.; Bertoni, M.; Bienert, S.; Studer, G.; Tauriello, G.; Gumienny, R.; Heer, F.T.; De Beer, T.A.P.; Rempfer, C.; Bordoli, L.; et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W296–W303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Yan, Y.; Wen, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.Y. Addressing recent docking challenges: A hybrid strategy to integrate template-based and free protein-protein docking. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2017, 85, 497–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, P.; Li, B.; Huang, S.-Y. HDOCK: A web server for protein–protein and protein–DNA/RNA docking based on a hybrid strategy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W365–W373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Doyle, J.J. A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, Z.; Ueda, T.; Messing, J. Characterization of the maize prolamin box-binding factor-1 (PBF-1) and its role in the developmental regulation of the zein multigene family. Gene 1998, 223, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yanagisawa, S. A novel DNA-binding domain that may form a single zinc finger motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 3403–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yanagisawa, S. Dof Domain Proteins: Plant-Specific Transcription Factors Associated with Diverse Phenomena Unique to Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hernandez, H.; Bates, L.S. A Modified Method for Rapid Tryptophan Analysis of Maize; CIMMYT: Mexico City, Mexico, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nurit, E.; Tiessen, A.; Pixley, K.V.; Palacios-Rojas, N. Reliable and Inexpensive Colorimetric Method for Determining Protein-Bound Tryptophan in Maize Kernels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 7233–7238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Çevikkalp, S.A.; Löker, G.B.; Yaman, M.; Amoutzopoulos, B. A simplified HPLC method for determination of tryptophan in some cereals and legumes. Food Chem. 2016, 193, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kaur, N.; Kumar, R.; Singh, A.; Shobha, D.; Das, A.K.; Chaudhary, D.; Kaur, Y.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, P.; Singh, B. Improvement in nutritional quality of traditional unleavened flat bread using Quality Protein Maize. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 963368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Magulama, E.E.; Sales, E.K. Marker-assisted introgression of opaque 2 gene into elite maize inbred lines. USM R D 2009, 17, 131–135. [Google Scholar]
  51. Babu, R.; Nair, S.; Kumar, A.; Venkatesh, S.; Sekhar, J.C.; Singh, N.N.; Srinivasan, G.; Gupta, H.S. Two-generation marker-aided backcrossing for rapid conversion of normal maize lines to quality protein maize (QPM). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 888–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Dreher, K.; Khairallah, M.; Ribaut, J.-M.; Morris, M. Money matters (I): Costs of field and laboratory procedures associated with conventional and marker-assisted maize breeding at CIMMYT. Mol. Breed. 2003, 11, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jilo, T. Nutritional benefit and development of quality protein maize (QPM) in Ethiopia. Cereal Res. Commun. 2021, 50, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 14 00531 g001 550
Figure 1. phi112 marked DNA and opaque2 functional associations. (A). ph112 marked DNA. The primer sequences are shown in red. The discovered motifs are underlined. The motif discovery associated with transcription factor activity is boxed. The green region marks the DNA sequence used to perform protein–DNA interaction analysis. (B). Functional associations of opaque2 protein (numbers denote proteins mentioned in the Table). PBF1 transcription factor is marked with an arrow. (C). List of interacting proteins with the score indicating the association’s likelihood.
Figure 1. phi112 marked DNA and opaque2 functional associations. (A). ph112 marked DNA. The primer sequences are shown in red. The discovered motifs are underlined. The motif discovery associated with transcription factor activity is boxed. The green region marks the DNA sequence used to perform protein–DNA interaction analysis. (B). Functional associations of opaque2 protein (numbers denote proteins mentioned in the Table). PBF1 transcription factor is marked with an arrow. (C). List of interacting proteins with the score indicating the association’s likelihood.
Genes 14 00531 g001
Genes 14 00531 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression profile of Dof1 and Pbf1 genes. Gene expression of Dof1 and Pbf1 in seed at various Days after Pollination (DAP) is depicted, data being retrieved from the MaizeGDB database. The expression scale is shown on the right, with dark red indicating the highest expression.
Figure 2. Expression profile of Dof1 and Pbf1 genes. Gene expression of Dof1 and Pbf1 in seed at various Days after Pollination (DAP) is depicted, data being retrieved from the MaizeGDB database. The expression scale is shown on the right, with dark red indicating the highest expression.
Genes 14 00531 g002
Genes 14 00531 g003 550
Figure 3. DNA–protein interaction. (A). PBF1 partial structure (green) interacting with DNA (orange double helix with nucleotides in cyan). (B). Nucleotides and amino acids involved in the interaction. Nucleotides and amino acids are shown in one- and three-letter codes. 5′ and 3′ ends of the sense strand of DNA have been marked. (C). The region of PBF1 that binds phi112 marked DNA has been underlined in red. The amino acids that make polar contact with DNA have been highlighted in red.
Figure 3. DNA–protein interaction. (A). PBF1 partial structure (green) interacting with DNA (orange double helix with nucleotides in cyan). (B). Nucleotides and amino acids involved in the interaction. Nucleotides and amino acids are shown in one- and three-letter codes. 5′ and 3′ ends of the sense strand of DNA have been marked. (C). The region of PBF1 that binds phi112 marked DNA has been underlined in red. The amino acids that make polar contact with DNA have been highlighted in red.
Genes 14 00531 g003
Genes 14 00531 g004 550
Figure 4. Standardization of primers and designing of multiplex PCR. (A). PCR using primers phi217698, phi112 and phi057. (B). Multiplex PCR using primers phi217698 and phi112. A total of 1 µL of two concentrations of genomic DNA, viz., 10 and 20 ng/µL, each of normal and QPM genomic DNA, were used in a 20 µL PCR for amplification.
Figure 4. Standardization of primers and designing of multiplex PCR. (A). PCR using primers phi217698, phi112 and phi057. (B). Multiplex PCR using primers phi217698 and phi112. A total of 1 µL of two concentrations of genomic DNA, viz., 10 and 20 ng/µL, each of normal and QPM genomic DNA, were used in a 20 µL PCR for amplification.
Genes 14 00531 g004
Genes 14 00531 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the key stages and concerns in protein quality in maize. (A). Both the planting of authenticated seeds and maintenance of appropriate distance are necessary to ensure high protein quality in maize. (B). The authenticity of the planting material can be verified through the use of the dominant marker phi112 in a multiplex format for unambiguity. Pbf1 appears to master-regulate the high protein quality phenotype. (C). Analysis of the produced grain through available methods.
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the key stages and concerns in protein quality in maize. (A). Both the planting of authenticated seeds and maintenance of appropriate distance are necessary to ensure high protein quality in maize. (B). The authenticity of the planting material can be verified through the use of the dominant marker phi112 in a multiplex format for unambiguity. Pbf1 appears to master-regulate the high protein quality phenotype. (C). Analysis of the produced grain through available methods.
Genes 14 00531 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, A.; Karjagi, C.; Kaur, S.; Jeet, G.; Bhamare, D.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, S.; Das, A.; Gupta, M.; Chaudhary, D.P.; et al. Characterization of phi112, a Molecular Marker Tightly Linked to the o2 Gene of Maize, and Its Utilization in Multiplex PCR for Differentiating Normal Maize from QPM. Genes 2023, 14, 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020531

AMA Style

Singh A, Karjagi C, Kaur S, Jeet G, Bhamare D, Gupta S, Kumar S, Das A, Gupta M, Chaudhary DP, et al. Characterization of phi112, a Molecular Marker Tightly Linked to the o2 Gene of Maize, and Its Utilization in Multiplex PCR for Differentiating Normal Maize from QPM. Genes. 2023; 14(2):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020531

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Alla, Chikkappa Karjagi, Sehgeet Kaur, Gagan Jeet, Deepak Bhamare, Sonu Gupta, Sunil Kumar, Abhijit Das, Mamta Gupta, D. P. Chaudhary, and et al. 2023. "Characterization of phi112, a Molecular Marker Tightly Linked to the o2 Gene of Maize, and Its Utilization in Multiplex PCR for Differentiating Normal Maize from QPM" Genes 14, no. 2: 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020531

APA Style

Singh, A., Karjagi, C., Kaur, S., Jeet, G., Bhamare, D., Gupta, S., Kumar, S., Das, A., Gupta, M., Chaudhary, D. P., Bhushan, B., Jat, B. S., Kumar, R., Dagla, M. C., & Kumar, M. (2023). Characterization of phi112, a Molecular Marker Tightly Linked to the o2 Gene of Maize, and Its Utilization in Multiplex PCR for Differentiating Normal Maize from QPM. Genes, 14(2), 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020531

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop