Next Article in Journal
miR-23b-3p Modulating Cytoprotective Autophagy and Glutamine Addiction in Sorafenib Resistant HepG2, a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line
Next Article in Special Issue
Status and Prospects of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Automation—A Survey among Laboratory Directors and Their Designates
Previous Article in Journal
New Insights into the Regulatory Role of Ferroptosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis via Consensus Clustering of Ferroptosis-Related Genes and Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
PPP1R7 Is a Novel Translocation Partner of CBFB via t(2;16)(q37;q22) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/genes13081374
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Commonly Assessed Markers in Childhood BCP-ALL Diagnostic Panels and Their Association with Genetic Aberrations and Outcome Prediction

by
Jan Kulis
1,*,
Łukasz Sędek
2,
Łukasz Słota
1,
Bartosz Perkowski
1 and
Tomasz Szczepański
1
1
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. 3 Maja 13-15, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. Jordana 19, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(8), 1374; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081374
Submission received: 8 July 2022 / Revised: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Aberrations in Hematologic Malignancies)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Immunophenotypic characterization of leukemic cells with the use of flow cytometry (FC) is a fundamental tool in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) diagnostics. A variety of genetic aberrations underlie specific B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) subtypes and their identification is of great importance for risk group stratification. These aberrations include: ETV6::RUNX1 fusion gene, Philadelphia chromosome (BCR::ABL1 fusion gene), rearrangements of the KMT2A, TCF3::PBX1 fusion gene and changes in chromosome number (hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy). Diagnostic panels for BCP-ALL usually include B-cell lineage specific antigens: CD19, CD10, CD20, maturation stage markers: CD34, CD10, CD38, TdT, IgM and other markers useful for possible genetic subtype indication. Some genetic features of leukemic cells (blasts) are associated with expression of certain antigens. This review comprehensively summarizes all known research data on genotype-immunophenotype correlations in BCP-ALL. In some cases, single molecules are predictive of particular genetic subtypes, i.e., NG2 with KMT2A gene rearrangements or CD123 with hyperdiploidy. However, much more information on possible genotype or prognosis can be obtained with wider (≥8-color) panels. In several studies, a quantitative antigen expression scale and advanced statistical analyses were used to further increase the specificity and sensitivity of genotype/immunophenotype correlation detection. Fast detection of possible genotype/immunophenotype correlations makes multicolor flow cytometry an essential tool for initial leukemia diagnostics and stratification.

1. Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most frequent childhood neoplasm, accounting for more than 20% of all childhood cancers. It develops by malignant transformation of immature lymphocyte precursors in the bone marrow (BM) or thymus [1,2]. Of the two types of ALL, the one that originates from B-cell lineage—B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) is more common than the T-cell ALL (T-ALL) and accounts for > 80% of childhood ALL [3]. In recent years, the therapy effectiveness has been improved and the treatment protocols have been adjusted based on risk stratification resulting in raising the survival rates up to 80–90% [1,4]. However, relapses and therapy related complications still occur in 20% of cases [5].
Immunophenotype characterization with the use of flow cytometry (FC) is an essential tool for ALL diagnostics. It allows determination of the ALL subtype—one of the characteristics associated with disease outcome [1,2,6,7,8]. Diagnostic panels for BCP-ALL should include B-cell lineage specific antigens (CD19, CD10, CD20) and other markers useful for ALL subclassification and indicating clinically important abnormalities [9]. EuroFlow consortium have proposed an optimized diagnostic panel for BCP-ALL that consists of maturation stage markers: CD34, CD20, CD10, CD38, Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) and IgM (heavy M/μ immunoglobulin chain); leukemia associated immunophenotype (LAIP) markers: CD33, CD13, CD9, CD81, and markers useful for possible genetic subtype indication: CD15, CD66c, CD123, NG2 [10,11]. Based on expression of CD10, IgM and cyIgK/cyIgL (cytoplasmic Kappa/Lambda light chain) the European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL) identifies three BCP-ALL subtypes: BI - BIII (Table 1). The most mature B-IV subtype is now recognized as leukemic variant of Burkitt lymphoma—mature B-ALL [12,13].
In addition to immunophenotyping, a variety of genetic aberrations underlie the specific BCP-ALL subtypes and their identification is of great importance for risk group stratification. Quick detection of potential genetic aberrations is beneficial for the patients, as it enables appropriate therapeutic decisions to be taken [3,6,14]. While flow cytometry as a technique is historically older than modern cytogenetic and molecular genetic methods, it is still considered very useful and has many advantages, such as lower cost and faster results availability (within the same working day). Some genetic features of leukemic cells (blasts) are associated with expression of certain antigens. Therefore, immunophenotyping of blasts can provide information about genotype before the results of cytogenetic and/or molecular tests are obtained [6,10,15].
Commonly assessed genetic aberrations underlying BCP-ALL that have evidenced prognostic significance include:
  • The ETV6::RUNX1 gene fusion (previously known as TEL-AML1) is a result of chromosomal translocation t(12;21)(p13;q22) that is present in 22–25% of BCP-ALL, and correlates with good outcome in children [3,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
  • Philadelphia chromosome is the result of a reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11) that results with a fusion gene named BCR::ABL1 and is associated with poor prognosis for BCP-ALL patients [3,19,21,22].
  • Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-like ALL or BCR::ABL1-like ALL (Ph-positive ALL without BCR::ABL1 fusion protein) is a subgroup of patients that do not have the BCR::ABL1 fusion protein expressed from the Philadelphia chromosome but have a gene-expression profile similar to that of patients with BCR::ABL1 ALL [19,23,24].
  • Rearrangements of the KMT2A (previously named MLL) gene as a result of translocations within q23 region of chromosome 11 (t(11q23)) [6]. These aberrations are associated with an adverse clinical course of BCP-ALL, particularly in infant ALL [3,19,25,26].
  • TCF3::PBX1 fusion gene produced by t(1;19)(q23;p13.3) translocation [3,6,19]. Initially associated with poor outcome but recent therapies are improving the patient’s prognosis. However, the risk of CNS relapse appears to be higher in this genetic subgroup [19,20].
  • Hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy as a result of increase or decrease in chromosome number. Hyperdiploidy patients tend to have more favorable outcome [3] in contrary to patients with hypodiploidy [19,27].
Based on these features, BCP-ALL can be divided into corresponding genotypic subtypes. BCP-ALL that cannot be characterized by any of the above aberrations is often referred to as “B-other” subtype [3].
This review highlights the importance and meaning of specific markers commonly used for BCP-ALL diagnostics focusing on prognostic role. Although there are many studies on genotype- immunophenotype correlations, the majority of these studies focus on a single or few antigens. We wanted to sum up all known research data and present it in comprehensive form. We also wanted to highlight the utility of flow cytometry in BCP-ALL diagnostics.

2. Materials and Methods

For this review, the databases (including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were systematically searched for all relevant reports. The last search update was on 1 July 2022. Search terms included “acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” “BCP-ALL,” “immunophenotype,” “correlation” and all of the markers included in the study independently. The review also included the references from the identified papers. Because of the varying details of the methodology among cited studies, this review does not describe the methodological details of every study. In flow cytometric immunophenotyping, the most commonly used parameter describing the expression of a marker is the percentage of positive cells. The standard cutoff to consider the expression of an antigen as “positive” is 20%. Therefore, if the source literature did not state otherwise, >20% expression was noted as “+” in Table 2 in the Results section. In some cases, the expression was defined using median of fluorescence intensity (MFI). MFI allows for more precise interpretation and defines the expression gradually (from “low” to “bright”). The majority of studies transform the expression data into easy-to-understand terms, such as “positive”, “negative” (noted as “+” or “−“, respectively), “low” or “bright” (Table 2). If the source literature contained figures with dot-plots, we used our own cytometry experience to define the expression if it was not already stated by the authors.

3. Results

  • CD19
CD19 is a B lineage specific marker first identified as B4 antigen. It has a homogenous expression on the surface of hematogones, mature B lymphocytes and neoplastic B-cells. CD19 is present in almost every BCP-ALL case; it is a key component of both diagnostic and minimal residual disease monitoring panels in BCP-ALL [10,28]. Its expression is activated by the transcription factor Paired Box 5 (PAX5). The CD19 molecule is involved in B-cell receptor signaling (BCR). Its function is crucial for B-cell development and it may also have a critical role in the survival and maintenance of malignant human B lineage cells. Homogenous structure, high specificity to the B-cell lineage and the fact that it is a surface (easy to access) antigen make this molecule a good target for immunotherapy [28].
  • CD10
The CD10 antigen is expressed by normal B-cell precursor cells (also known as hematogones) found in bone marrow of healthy person. The highest levels of CD10 are visible on the earliest B-cell precursors. Following the maturation path, one can see that the CD10 expression slightly decreases on older hematogones and completely disappears on mature B-cells [9,29].
CD10 is also expressed on a subset of mature neutrophils but its expression is lower as compared to hematogones [9,29,30].
In BCP-ALL the CD10 is one of the most important markers that determine the BCP-ALL subtype. In the most frequent one—common-ALL—CD10 is strongly expressed on blast cells, exceeding the usual level of expression seen on normal hematogones. On the other hand, in pro-B subtype, blasts are CD10 negative [13,31].
CD10 negative subtype of BCP-ALL (pro-B) is often strongly correlated with rearrangements in the KMT2A gene—a feature considered as a poor risk factor [10,32,33].
In patients with the common BCP-ALL subtype with high expression of CD10 on blasts there is a higher chance for t(9;22)(chromosome Philadelphia) to occur [22,34]. In addition, these patients have a higher chance to manifest the t(12;21) ETV6::RUNX1 fusion gene [33] but these relationships are considered as weak by most [32,35].
  • CD66c
CD66c is a heavily glycosylated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-related glycoprotein that is involved in adhesion to another surface glycoprotein - E-selectin [36]. Its expression is usually limited to granulocytes and their precursors [37]; however, CD66c can also be expressed on blasts in BCP-ALL and is the most frequently expressed myeloid antigen in BCP-ALL. CD66c is associated with chromosome Philadelphia [21,32,37,38,39]. There are also some reports of CD66c positive cases in patients with hyperdiploidy [32,33]. Commonly assessed in BCP-ALL genetic aberrations: ETV6::RUNX1 fusion gene, PBX and KMT2A rearrangement are more frequent in patients without CD66c expression. Therefore, with exclusion of t(9;22), high expression of CD66c could be considered as a good prognosis factor [32,38]. An example of overexpression of CD66c on blast cells is shown on Figure 1 as well as aberrant overexpression of NG2, TSLPR and CD123 molecules described below.
  • NG2
The neuron-glial antigen 2 (NG2) molecule was first discovered on oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in the mammalian central nervous system [25,26,40]. NG2 is often expressed on the surface of blast cells in pro-B (CD10 negative) BCP-ALL subtype. Studies show that NG2 expression is strongly associated with KMT2A rearrangement (Figure 1). Using the monoclonal antibody for cell surface NG2 recognition in a BCP-ALL immunophenotyping diagnostic panel can predict KMT2A before obtaining cytogenetic results [10,26,32,33]. Accuracy values for predicting KMT2A rearrangement reported by Emerenciano et al. vary from 0.67 to 0.93 for qualitative methods and 0.72–1.00 for quantitative methods, depending on time from sample collection to staining and testing [25]. Schwartz et al., calculated specificity and sensitivity equal as 0.89 (both) and positive prediction value as 0.93 for NG2 on a group of 120 adult patients [26].
  • TSLPR/CRLF2
Overexpression of thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR) on BCP-ALL blasts is the result of the mutation in the gene encoding the cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2) molecule—CRLF2 gene (Figure 1). This mutation leads to activation of STAT3 and STAT5 pathways mediated by JAK2 and has an impact on cell proliferation and development in the hematopoietic system [41,42]. This molecule is associated with Ph-like ALL genotypic subgroup [24]. TSLPR expression is correlated with IKZF1 deletion and is associated with poor prognosis for BCP-ALL patients. Patients with high expression of TSLPR are candidates for targeted therapy using inhibitors of molecules involved in JAK/STAT pathway [19,42,43].
  • CD123
CD123 molecule, also known as the interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain (IL-3Rα) is normally expressed by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Various studies have shown that CD123 is often aberrantly overexpressed on BCP-ALL blasts in comparison to normal B cells (Figure 1) [44,45]. Therefore, CD123 is useful in monitoring the minimal residual disease (MRD). High expression of CD123 on blasts is known to be strongly correlated with hyperdiploid karyotypes [1,33,45,46]. The sensitivity and specificity of high CD123 expression for hyperdiploidy are 81.5% and 91.5%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 78.6% [45]. Moreover, low CD123 is associated with ETV6::RUNX1 genotype [45]. Additional studies have shown that CD123 is also associated with t(9;22)—BCR::ABL1 genotype and that the CD123 molecule could also be a potential target for the immunotherapy in some cases [44].
  • CD9
CD9 belongs to the transmembrane tetraspanin 4 (TM4) protein family. Its biological functions include regulation of apoptosis, adhesion and motility. This molecule is expressed by B-cell precursors, mature lymphocytes, monocytes, megakaryocytes and other cells [14,47].
Some studies have shown that CD9 positive BCP-ALL cases have greater tumorigenic potential and drug resistance. It has been also observed that low or lack of CD9 expression is correlated with ETV6::RUNX1 genotype—a molecular subtype with generally favorable prognosis [6,14,32,47]. Tsagarakis et al. have concluded that expression of CD9 shows direct correlation with BCR::ABL1, KMT2A (also confirmed by others [32]) and TCF3::PBX1 genotypes [6].
  • CD38
Most characteristically, the highest expression of CD38 is observed on plasma cells [10,48]. CD38 is also strongly and consistently expressed by B-cell precursors. Other cell populations in bone marrow have a heterogenous and lower expression of this marker [10]. BCP-ALL blasts have often lower and heterogenous expression of CD38 which is useful in distinguishing these populations in MRD assessment [7,32,49].
CD38 has been found useful in outcome prediction. According to Chulian et. al., high CD38 expression shows significant direct correlation with the presence of ETV6::RUNX1 gene fusion and significant inverse correlation with hyperdiploid karyotype. Lower levels of CD38 could be associated with a worse outcome in terms of survival [1]. However, other studies show that high CD38 expression among Ph negative patients is an indicator for early relapse risk [50].
  • CD45
CD45 antigen (the leukocyte common antigen—LCA) is a glycoprotein with a heavily glycosylated extracellular domain a transmembrane segment and a cytoplasmic fragment with tyrosine phosphatase activity. This molecule belongs to the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family. CD45 is a regulator of T-and B-cell-receptor signaling. CD45 is expressed on all cells in bone marrow except erythroblasts, erythrocytes and platelets, with the strongest expression on lymphocytes and moderate on neutrophils [4,36].
BCP-ALL blasts have often dimmer expression of CD45 than mature lymphocytes [51]. CD45 low and negative patients tend to have more favorable outcomes [51,52] and high expression is associated with worse event-free survival rate [4]. Studies show that low and negative CD45 can be associated with hyperdiploidy [11] and t(9;22)—BCR::ABL1 genotype [32].
  • CD20
CD20 is a lineage specific antigen of B-cells with increasing expression level along their maturation from the lowest on B-cell precursors to the highest on mature B-lymphocytes [9,53].
CD20 is involved in B cell activation and regulation of their growth. This molecule also acts as a cell membrane calcium channel [36].
Strong expression of CD20 is more typical for B-cell lymphomas and Burkitt lymphomas than ALL [9,54]. In BCP-ALL blasts have often only partial or low expression of CD20 which, however, may increase during the treatment (particularly in the steroid therapy stage) [36].
In adult BCP-ALL cases, the expression of CD20 is associated with poor prognosis and higher risk of relapse. However, in pediatric BCP-ALL there is no clear evidence of CD20 impacting the disease outcome [54]. Still, some researchers report that (over)expression of CD20 could be associated with t(9;22)—BCR::ABL1 genotype and can be useful to exclude KMT2A gene rearrangement even when expressed at low levels [32].
A chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody—Rituximab targets the CD20 molecule and is useful for treatment CD20 positive BCP-ALL patients [36].
  • CD24
CD24 is a glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-linked sialoglycoprotein and is encoded by a gene that is mapped to the long arm of chromosome 6. CD24 appears during B-cell maturation in BM at the stage of pre-B-I cells and is upregulated until mature B-cell stage [55]. The expression of CD24 disappears when B-cells transform to plasma cells. Apart from B-cells, the expression of CD24 is observed on neutrophils. CD24 is also a sensitive marker of most mature B-cell malignancies; however, its expression may be variable [56,57]. Studies show that CD24 is usually expressed on blast cells despite the patient’s genotype [32] but lack of CD24 can be associated with KMT2A gene rearrangement [26,32].
  • CD22
CD22 is another B-cell-associated marker [58], expressed from the early stages of B-cell (pro-B-cell) maturation in BM; it precedes CD19 which appears at the stage of pre-B-I cells. Its expression is usually dim/moderate on all stages of hematogones and is upregulated on peripheral mature B-cells [53]. Leukemic blasts in BCP-ALL usually exhibit low expression levels, similar to those of normal hematogones [9,13]. This antigen became already a widely used target in patients undergoing immunotherapy. Moxetumomab (anti-CD22 immunotoxin) is an example of a promising monoclonal antibody-based drug for patients with a poor response to standard chemotherapy-based treatment [58]. Other anti-CD22 antibodies that can be useful in immunotherapy are Epratuzumab and Inotuzumab Ozogamycin [36]. Studies show that low positive expression of CD22 can be associated with BCR::ABL1, TCF3::PBX1 and ETV6::RUNX1 genotypes, bright with hyperdiploidy [32]. CD22 is usually absent in cases with KMT2A gene rearrangement [32,59].
  • CD13
A marker normally associated with myeloid cell lineages, involved in the alteration of target cell specificity and acting to activate or inhibit bioactive proteins. CD13 also controls the chemotactic response of neutrophils to IL-8 and is involved in tumor migration as it supports cell adhesion [30].
Blast cells in BCP-ALL can have aberrant expression of molecules specific to other than B-cells lineage such as CD13, which is normally associated with myeloid lineage or early hematopoietic stem cells [60,61]. CD13 positive BCP-ALL cases are more likely to have ETV6::RUNX1 or BCR::ABL1 genotype [16,22,34,39,62]. Hrusak et al. suggest that CD13 is usually absent in TCF3::PBX1, KMT2A and hyperdiploidy genotypes [32].
  • Cytoplasmic IgM (cIgM)
As a component of normal B-cell receptors, cytoplasmic expression of this heavy immunoglobulin chain receptor starts at the stage of late pre-B-I cell and is upregulated along further maturation of B-cells in BM. Immature B-cells exhibit at least partial surface expression of IgM while in mature B-cell IgM is only present on the cell surface membrane. Expression of cytoplasmic IgM in BCP-ALL determines the pre-B subtype [13,31,63,64]. Studies show that cIgM can be associated with TCF3::PBX1 gene rearrangement and is usually absent in patients with other common genetic aberrations [6,10,15,32].
  • CD15
CD15 is expressed by monocytes and granulocytes and is involved in carbohydrate interactions and phagocytosis. CD15 is expressed in high levels on mature granulocytes [30,65,66].
CD15 can also be detected on the surface of BCP-ALL blasts in pro-B (CD10 negative) subtype. Therefore, like NG2, this molecule is associated with KMT2A gene rearrangement and is often absent in other genetic subtypes [6,10,32].
  • CD33
CD33 is a transmembrane sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-type lectin (SIGLEC) receptor which is involved in negative selection of human self-regenerating stem cells [30,67]. Other known functions of CD33 include: apoptosis induction and cytokine secretion modulation [36]. CD33 is expressed on mature myeloid cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells (but with low or negative expression on early normal hematopoietic stem cells), with the highest expression on mature monocytes. Its expression is commonly found on blasts in AML, however it may also be aberrantly expressed by blasts in BCP-ALL [10,32,61,67,68].
  • TdT
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl tranferase (TdT) is an intracellular and intranuclear DNA polymerase that catalyzes the template-independent addition of deoxynucleotides to the 3’-hydroxyl terminus of oligonucleotide primers. TdT is strongly expressed in lymphoid precursor cells (both T and B-cells) and usually is present on blast cells in ALL, with the exception of very immature subtypes of T- and B-lineage ALL (ETP-ALL and pro-B-ALL, respectively) [13]. Low expression of TdT can be associated with KMT2A gene rearrangement [33]. This marker is also useful in distinguishing ALL from mature B-cell malignancies (including Burkitt lymphoma, BL) which typically are TdT-negative [9,69,70].
  • CD81
CD81 is an integral surface membrane protein with 4 transmembrane domains, is involved in carrying out signal transduction and is crucial for B-cell development and the humoral response. CD81 has the highest expression on normal lymphocytes. On the other hand, CD81 is expressed with lower intensity and greater variability on granulocytes, monocytes, basophils, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs). CD81 is not expressed on erythrocytes and platelets. CD81 is aberrantly decreased in B lymphoblastic leukemia blasts, particularly in CD34-positive cases [10,49,71]. High expression of CD81 lowers the chance for ETV6::RUNX1, KMT2A and hyperdiploidy to occur [33].
  • CD34
In the bone marrow, CD34 is primarily expressed in stem cells and their malignant counterparts. This marker is a cell surface glycoprotein that functions as a cell–cell adhesion factor [69]. B-cell hematogones have CD34 on their surface at the earliest stage of development. It is also commonly present on blasts in BCP-ALL but the expression is often heterogenous [10,29,62,72]. Lack of CD34 can be associated with the rearrangements of the KMT2A gene and TCF3::PBX1 fusion gene [6,32,33].
The table does not include CD19 antigen because it is expressed in virtually every case of BCP-ALL. For some markers the prognostic significance cannot be determined. There are no reports about TSLPR molecule being associated with genetic aberrations included in the table. However, it is associated with Ph-like ALL and unfavorable outcomes.
Table
Table 2. Immunophenotypic features of studied genetic subtypes.
Table 2. Immunophenotypic features of studied genetic subtypes.
AntigenETV6::RUNX1BCR::ABL1KMT2ATCF3::PBX1Hyper-DiploidyPrognosis if +EGIL Subtype if +
CD10+ [32,33,35,47,62]+ [6,22,32,34]− [10,13,32,33,59]+/− [13,32]+ [11,32]Good [26]B-II [13,31]
CD66c− [13,32,38,73]+ [13,21,32,37,38,39]− [6,32,38]− [32,38]+ [11,32,33]InconclusiveIrrelevant
NG2− [32]− [32]+ [10,25,26,32,33]− [32] [32]Poor [3,25,26]B-I [10,26,32]
TSLPRNDNDNDNDNDPoor [24,42,43]Irrelevant
CD123Low + [45]+ [44]+ [6]− [6]+ [1,33,44,45,46,74]Good [3,45]B-II [45]
CD9− [6,13,14,32,47]+ [6]+ [6,32]+ [6,32]NDPoor [14,47]Irrelevant
CD38+ [1,33]− [6,34]+ [6]+ [6]− [1]Inconclusive [1,50]Irrelevant
CD45Low+ [16,32,33,62]−/Low+ [32]Low+ [32]Low + [32]− [11,32,53]Poor [4,51,52]Irrelevant
CD20− [13,16,32,62]+ [32]− [6,13,32,59]Low + [13,32]Low+ [32]Inconclusive [39,54]Irrelevant
CD24+ [13,32]+ [13,32]− [13,26,32,33]+ [32]+ [32]InconclusiveB-IV [56,57]
CD22Low+ [32]Low+ [32]− [32,59]+ [32]+ [32]InconclusiveAll [13,31]
CD13+ [13,22,32]+ [16,32,34,39,62]− [32]− [32]− [32]InconclusiveIrrelevant
cIgM− [32]− [32]− [6,32]+ [6,10,15,32]− [32]PoorB-III [13,31,63,64]
CD15− [32,62]− [6,32,39]+ [6,10,13,26,32,59]− [32]− [32]PoorB-I [13]
CD33+ [13,32]+ [13,22,39]− [32]− [32]− [32]Poor [1]Irrelevant
TdT+ [13,32]+ [13,32]Low+ [33]/ + [13,32]+[32]+[32]InconclusiveB-I, II, III [13,31]
CD81Low+/−[33]ND− [33]ND− [33]GoodIrrelevant
CD34Low+ [33]/ + [6,13,32,62]+ [6,13,34]− [6,32,33]− [6,13,32]+ [32,33]InconclusiveIrrelevant

4. Discussion

Single antigen expression can rarely predict a molecular genetic subtype. Only some exceptional molecules appear to have strong prediction value. For example, NG2 antigen was associated with KMT2A gene rearrangement in one of the first reports about immunophenotype-genotype correlations. It was confirmed by other researchers in later studies and is still considered a useful feature for KMT2A rearrangement prediction [10,25,26,32]. Overexpression of CD123 is another example of single molecule that can be strongly associated with genotype. Many studies have confirmed a decent sensitivity and specificity for this marker to predict the hyperdiploidy [1,44,45,74].
Some markers have been studied more frequently than others and are well known to be associated with specific genotypes. CD66c [1,21,32,37,38,39] and CD13 [16,32,34,39,62], for example, are associated by many with BCR::ABL1. Lack of CD9 is often correlated with ETV6::RUNX1 genotype [6,14,32,47]. Expression of a well described marker such as CD10 can be instantly associated with good prognosis. Similarly, NG2 can be instantly identified as a poor prognosis feature. On the other hand, markers like CD66c can be associated with few genotypes that are either favorable or not. Therefore, finding CD66c expression remains inconclusive in terms of prognosis (see Table 2 for details). Unfortunately, some markers, such as CD24 or CD33, have been studied only rarely or were only mentioned in a review paper [32].
Instead of a single marker analysis, a whole immunophenotype of blast cells should be assessed to obtain optimal genotype prediction values. Proposed immunophenotypes for corresponding genotypes can be found in Table 2. In majority of cases, the obtained results are consistent.
Different study groups have been using different methods for reporting a “+” expression. The usual cutoff for considering a population to have expression of given marker is set to 20%. However, FC immunophenotyping is difficult to standardize. Using different reagents on different machines can produce inconsistent results. Considering how old are some studies reported here and how the technology has developed over time, the 20% cutoff appears to be prone for misinterpretation and neglects the expression intensity. For antigens that have a heterogenous expression, using the percentage may be the correct way but overall, using the median of fluorescence intensity (MFI) better represents the actual expression level. Furthermore, studies presented in this paper have been conducted on various groups of patients in terms of age.
A majority of papers describe the expression of antigens measured qualitatively (as “+”, low or negative) and the prediction is based on one-dimensional statistical analysis. In a few instances, specificity and sensitivity of the molecular aberration prediction is provided. Given the mutually exclusive nature of the four major cytogenetic translocations, a straightforward correlation study might be sufficient in some cases. There are a few review-type studies collecting the genotype/immunophenotype correlation data and clinical outcome results, either focusing on one marker or a whole immunophenotype. It is worthwhile mentioning that a study by Hrusak et al., from 2002, provides highly detailed information that was not provided by others.
There are only few studies with more advanced statistical analysis [25,26,33,45] and with expression level measured quantitatively (with gradual expression assessment) [6,33,34,62].
Taberneo et al. used MFI and coefficient of variation (CV) to assess the intensity and homogeneity of expression of antigens. They presented the scoring system and concluded that a specific pattern of expression (homogenous + CD34, homogenous + CD10, intermediate or low CD38 and intermediate + CD13) is useful for predicting the BCR::ABL1 in adult BCP-ALL patients [34].
De Zen et al. proposed an original approach where the absolute levels of antigen expression were transformed from fluorescence channels into “molecules equivalent to soluble fluorochrome” (MESF). This method permitted accurate results with coefficient of variation (CV) and intensity of expression taken to account [62].
Tsagarakis et al. proposed the scoring system (SS) for predicting four genetic aberrations in patients with BCP-ALL. The system is based on the percentage of expression of particular antigens. The points are added or subtracted for expression of given marker and the calculated score is used to accurately predict a respective genetic rearrangement. The described method appears to be highly specific and significantly sensitive [6].
Kulis et al. developed a system based on the median of fluorescence intensity with a gradual antigen expression scale. Machine learning methods were applied for the genotype/immunophenotype correlation analysis. This approach enabled the researcher to expand and specify the meaning of particular expression levels of markers. The study also made an application tool for prediction studied aberrations, open to use by other researchers. Specific antigenic patterns were proposed that were strongly associated with respective aberrations. Due to the high complexity of immunophenotype description, most features cited in the results section (Table 2) were simplified for the sake of readability [33].

5. Conclusions

Since the development of multidimensional flow cytometry, much work has been undertaken to characterize the immunophenotypic features of BCP-ALL genetic categories. A wide panel of markers routinely applied for BCP-ALL diagnosis can provide substantial information about patient’s prognosis and the likely course of a disease. Overall, well established knowledge about genotype/immunophenotype correlations makes the multicolor flow cytometry an essential tool for initial leukemia diagnostics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.K., Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek) and T.S. Methodology: J.K. and Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek); Formal analysis: J.K., Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek) and T.S.; Investigation: J.K., Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek), Ł.S. (Łukasz Słota) and B.P.; Data curation: J.K.; Validation: J.K. and Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek); Writing—Original Draft Preparation: J.K. and Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek); Writing—Review and Editing: J.K., Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek), Ł.S. (Łukasz Słota), B.P. and T.S.; Visualization: J.K.; Supervision: T.S.; Funding acquisition: T.S. and Ł.S. (Łukasz Sędek); Project administration: T.S. and J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by Scientific Grant from the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland Nr. PCN-1-075/K/1/K.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chulián, S.; Martínez-Rubio, Á.; Pérez-García, V.M.; Rosa, M.; Blázquez Goñi, C.; Rodríguez Gutiérrez, J.F.; Hermosín-Ramos, L.; Molinos Quintana, Á.; Caballero-Velázquez, T.; Ramírez-Orellana, M.; et al. High-Dimensional Analysis of Single-Cell Flow Cytometry Data Predicts Relapse in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. Cancers 2020, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rezaei, M.S.; Esfandiari, N.; Refoua, S.; Shamaei, M. Characterization of Immunophenotypic Aberrancies in Adult and Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Lessons from Regional Variation. Iran. J. Pathol. 2020, 15, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, D.; Zheng, J.; Gerasimcik, N.; Lagerstedt, K.; Sjögren, H.; Abrahamsson, J.; Fogelstrand, L.; Mårtensson, I.-L. The Expression Pattern of the Pre-B Cell Receptor Components Correlates with Cellular Stage and Clinical Outcome in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, e0162638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Balasubramanian, P.; Singh, J.; Verma, D.; Kumar, R.; Bakhshi, S.; Tanwar, P.; Singh, A.R.; Chopra, A. Prognostic Significance of CD45 Antigen Expression in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2021, 89, 102562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cui, L.; Gao, C.; Wang, C.-J.; Zhao, X.-X.; Li, W.-J.; Li, Z.-G.; Zheng, H.-Y.; Wang, T.-Y.; Zhang, R.-D. Combined Analysis of IKZF1 Deletions and CRLF2 Expression on Prognostic Impact in Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2021, 62, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tsagarakis, N.J.; Papadhimitriou, S.I.; Pavlidis, D.; Marinakis, T.; Kostopoulos, I.V.; Stiakaki, E.; Polychronopoulou, S.; Paterakis, G. Flow Cytometric Predictive Scoring Systems for Common Fusions ETV6/RUNX1, BCR/ABL1, TCF3/PBX1 and Rearrangements of the KMT2A Gene, Proposed for the Initial Cytogenetic Approach in Cases of B-acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2019, 41, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Demina, I. Heterogeneity of Childhood Acute Leukemia with Mature B-Cell Immunophenotype. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 145, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cardoso, C.C.; Auat, M.; Santos-Pirath, I.M.; Rudolf-Oliveira, R.C.M.; da Silva, J.P.; Lange, B.G.; Siegel, D.; de Moraes, A.C.R.; Del Moral, J.A.G.; Santos-Silva, M.C. The Importance of CD39, CD43, CD81, and CD95 Expression for Differentiating B Cell Lymphoma by Flow Cytometry: CD39, CD43, CD81, AND CD95 FOR LYMPHOMA DIAGNOSIS. Cytom. B Clin. Cytom. 2018, 94, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Al-Shieban, S.; Byrne, E.; Trivedi, P.; Morilla, R.; Naresh, K.N. Immunohistochemical Distinction of Haematogones from B Lymphoblastic Leukaemia/Lymphoma or B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (B-ALL) on Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsies: A Study on 62 Patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2011, 154, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van Dongen, J.J.M.; Lhermitte, L.; Böttcher, S.; Almeida, J.; van der Velden, V.H.J.; Flores-Montero, J.; Rawstron, A.; Asnafi, V.; Lécrevisse, Q.; Lucio, P.; et al. Antibody Panels for Standardized N-Dimensional Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Normal, Reactive and Malignant Leukocytes. Leukemia 2012, 26, 1908–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Szczepański, T.; van der Velden, V.H.J.; van Dongen, J.J.M. Flow-Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Normal and Malignant Lymphocytes. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. CCLM 2006, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bene, M.; Castoldi, G.; Knapp, W.; Ludwig, W.; Matutes, E.; Orfao, A.; van’t Veer, M. Proposals for the Immunological Classification of Acute Leukemias. Leukemia 1995, 9, 1783–1786. [Google Scholar]
  13. Szczepański, T.; van der Velden, V.H.J.; van Dongen, J.J.M. Classification Systems for Acute and Chronic Leukaemias. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2003, 16, 561–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Blunck, C.B.; Terra-Granado, E.; Noronha, E.P.; Wajnberg, G.; Passetti, F.; Pombo-de-Oliveira, M.S.; Emerenciano, M. CD9 Predicts ETV6-RUNX1 in Childhood B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Hematol. Transfus. Cell Ther. 2019, 41, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alessandri, A.J.; Reid, G.S.D.; Bader, S.A.; Massing, B.G.; Sorensen, P.H.B.; Schultz, K.R. ETV6 (TEL)-AML1 Pre-B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Cells Are Associated with a Distinct Antigen-Presenting Phenotype: Antigen-Presentation Molecules in ETV6-AML1 Leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2002, 116, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Borowitz, M.; Rubnitz, J.; Nash, M.; Pullen, D.; Camitta, B. Surface Antigen Phenotype Can Predict TEL-AML1 Rearrangement in Childhood B-Precursor ALL: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study. Leukemia 1998, 12, 1764–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. van der Weyden, L.; Giotopoulos, G.; Rust, A.G.; Matheson, L.S.; van Delft, F.W.; Kong, J.; Corcoran, A.E.; Greaves, M.F.; Mullighan, C.G.; Huntly, B.J.; et al. Modeling the Evolution of ETV6-RUNX1–Induced B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Mice. Blood 2011, 118, 1041–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rubnitz, J.E.; Downing, J.R.; Pui, C.H.; Shurtleff, S.A.; Raimondi, S.C.; Evans, W.E.; Head, D.R.; Crist, W.M.; Rivera, G.K.; Hancock, M.L.; et al. TEL Gene Rearrangement in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A New Genetic Marker with Prognostic Significance. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997, 15, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hakeem, A.; Shiekh, A.A.; Bhat, G.M.; Lone, A.R. Prognostification of ALL by Cytogenetics. Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus. 2015, 31, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Burmeister, T.; Gokbuget, N.; Schwartz, S.; Fischer, L.; Hubert, D.; Sindram, A.; Hoelzer, D.; Thiel, E. Clinical Features and Prognostic Implications of TCF3-PBX1 and ETV6-RUNX1 in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Haematologica 2010, 95, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Owaidah, T.M.; Rawas, F.I.; Al khayatt, M.F.; Elkum, N.B. Expression of CD66c and CD25 in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia as a Predictor of the Presence of BCR/ABL Rearrangement. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Ther. 2008, 1, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Corrente, F.; Bellesi, S.; Metafuni, E.; Puggioni, P.L.; Marietti, S.; Ciminello, A.M.; Za, T.; Sorà, F.; Fianchi, L.; Sica, S.; et al. Role of Flow-Cytometric Immunophenotyping in Prediction of BCR/ABL1 Gene Rearrangement in Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: FLOW-CYTOMETRY IN BCR/ABL1 ADULT B-ALL. Cytom. B Clin. Cytom. 2018, 94, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Roberts, K.G.; Li, Y.; Payne-Turner, D.; Harvey, R.C.; Yang, Y.-L.; Pei, D.; McCastlain, K.; Ding, L.; Lu, C.; Song, G.; et al. Targetable Kinase-Activating Lesions in Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1005–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Arber, D.A.; Orazi, A.; Hasserjian, R.; Thiele, J.; Borowitz, M.J.; Le Beau, M.M.; Bloomfield, C.D.; Cazzola, M.; Vardiman, J.W. The 2016 Revision to the World Health Organization Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia. Blood 2016, 127, 2391–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Emerenciano, M.; Renaud, G.; Sant’Ana, M.; Barbieri, C.; Passetti, F.; Pombo-de-Oliveira, M.S. Challenges in the Use of NG2 Antigen as a Marker to Predict MLL Rearrangements in Multi-Center Studies. Leuk. Res. 2011, 35, 1001–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schwartz, S.; Rieder, H.; Schläger, B.; Burmeister, T.; Fischer, L.; Thiel, E. Expression of the Human Homologue of Rat NG2 in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Close Association with MLL Rearrangement and a CD10−/CD24−/CD65s+/CD15+ B-Cell Phenotype. Leukemia 2003, 17, 1589–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jarosova, M.; Volejnikova, J.; Porizkova, I.; Holzerova, M.; Pospisilova, D.; Novak, Z.; Vrbkova, J.; Mihal, V. Chromosomal Aberrations in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: 15-Year Single Center Experience. Cancer Genet. 2016, 209, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weiland, J.; Elder, A.; Forster, V.; Heidenreich, O.; Koschmieder, S.; Vormoor, J. CD19: A Multifunctional Immunological Target Molecule and Its Implications for Blineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: CD19 in Blineage ALL. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2015, 62, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Theunissen, P.M.J.; Sedek, L.; De Haas, V.; Szczepanski, T.; Van Der Sluijs, A.; Mejstrikova, E.; Nováková, M.; Kalina, T.; Lecrevisse, Q.; Orfao, A.; et al. The EuroFlow Consortium. Detailed Immunophenotyping of B-Cell Precursors in Regenerating Bone Marrow of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Patients: Implications for Minimal Residual Disease Detection. Br. J. Haematol. 2017, 178, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cruse, J.M.; Lewis, R.E.; Sanders, C.M.; Webb, R.N.; Beason, K.L.; Lam, J.; Koehler, J. Diminished CD10, CD13, and CD15 Expression in a Differentiated Granulocyte Population in CML. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2007, 83, 274–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chiaretti, S.; Zini, G.; Bassan, R. DIAGNOSIS AND SUBCLASSIFICATION OF ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 6, e2014073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hrušák, O.; Porwit-MacDonald, A. Antigen Expression Patterns Reflecting Genotype of Acute Leukemias. Leukemia 2002, 16, 1233–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kulis, J.; Wawrowski, Ł.; Sędek, Ł.; Wróbel, Ł.; Słota, Ł. Machine Learning Based Analysis of Relations between Antigen Expression and Genetic Aberrations in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tabernero, M.; Bortoluci, A.; Alaejos, I.; López-Berges, M.; Rasillo, A.; García-Sanz, R.; García, M.; Sayagués, J.; González, M.; Mateo, G.; et al. Adult Precursor B-ALL with BCR/ABL Gene Rearrangements Displays a Unique Immunophenotype Based on the Pattern of CD10, CD34, CD13 and CD38 Expression. Leukemia 2001, 15, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Takahashi, Y.; Horibe, K.; Kiyoi, H.; Miyashita, Y.; Fukuda, M.; Mori, H.; Nozaki, C.; Hasegawa, S.; Kawabe, T.; Kato, K.; et al. Prognostic Significance of TEL/AML1 Fusion Transcript in Childhood B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 1998, 20, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Morris, J.C.; Waldmann, T.A. Antibody-Based Therapy of Leukaemia. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2009, 11, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guillaume, N.; Penther, D.; Vaida, I.; Gruson, B.; Harrivel, V.; Claisse, J.F.; Capiod, J.C.; Lefrere, J.J.; Damaj, G. CD66c Expression in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Strength and Weakness: CD66C IN B-ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2011, 33, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kiyokawa, N.; Iijima, K.; Tomita, O.; Miharu, M.; Hasegawa, D.; Kobayashi, K.; Okita, H.; Kajiwara, M.; Shimada, H.; Inukai, T.; et al. Significance of CD66c Expression in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2014, 38, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jaso, J.; Thomas, D.A.; Cunningham, K.; Jorgensen, J.L.; Kantarjian, H.M.; Medeiros, L.J.; Wang, S.A. Prognostic Significance of Immunophenotypic and Karyotypic Features of Philadelphia Positive B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Cancer 2011, 117, 4009–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bueno, C.; Montes, R.; Martín, L.; Prat, I.; Hernandez, M.C.; Orfao, A.; Menendez, P. NG2 Antigen Is Expressed in CD34+ HPCs and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Precursors: Is NG2 Expression in Leukemia Dependent on the Target Cell Where Leukemogenesis Is Triggered? Leukemia 2008, 22, 1475–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Vetter, T.; Borowski, A.; Wohlmann, A.; Ranjan, N.; Kuepper, M.; Badura, S.; Ottmann, O.G.; Friedrich, K. Blockade of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP) Receptor Inhibits TSLP-Driven Proliferation and Signalling in Lymphoblasts from a Subset of B-Precursor ALL Patients. Leuk. Res. 2016, 40, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pastorczak, A.; Sedek, L.; Braun, M.; Madzio, J.; Sonsala, A.; Twardoch, M.; Fendler, W.; Nebral, K.; Taha, J.; Bielska, M.; et al. Surface Expression of Cytokine Receptor-Like Factor 2 Increases Risk of Relapse in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Harboring IKZF1 Deletions. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 25971–25982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sarno, J.; Savino, A.M.; Buracchi, C.; Palmi, C.; Pinto, S.; Bugarin, C.; Jager, A.; Bresolin, S.; Barber, R.C.; Silvestri, D.; et al. SRC/ABL Inhibition Disrupts CRLF2-Driven Signaling to Induce Cell Death in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 22872–22885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bras, A.E.; Haas, V.; Stigt, A.; Jongen-Lavrencic, M.; Beverloo, H.B.; Marvelde, J.G.; Zwaan, C.M.; Dongen, J.J.M.; Leusen, J.H.W.; Velden, V.H.J. CD123 Expression Levels in 846 Acute Leukemia Patients Based on Standardized Immunophenotyping. Cytom. B Clin. Cytom. 2019, 96, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Djokic, M.; Bjorklund, E.; Blennow, E.; Mazur, J.; Soderhall, S.; Porwit, A. Overexpression of CD123 Correlates with the Hyperdiploid Genotype in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Haematologica 2009, 94, 1016–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Adnan Awad, S.; Kamel, M.M.; Ayoub, M.A.; Kamel, A.M.; Elnoshokaty, E.H.; El Hifnawi, N. Immunophenotypic Characterization of Cytogenetic Subgroups in Egyptian Pediatric Patients With B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016, 16, S19–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gandemer, V.; Aubry, M.; Roussel, M.; Rio, A.-G.; de Tayrac, M.; Vallee, A.; Mosser, J.; Ly-Sunnaram, B.; Galibert, M.-D. CD9 Expression Can Be Used to Predict Childhood TEL/AML1-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Proposal for an Accelerated Diagnostic Flowchart. Leuk. Res. 2010, 34, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jakab, K.; Gopcsa, L.; Adam, E.; Domjan, G.; Sarkadi, B.; Paloczi, K. Application of Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping and Multidrug Resistance Assay in B-Cell Acute Lymphoid Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma. Neoplasma 2005, 52, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsitsikov, E.; Harris, M.H.; Silverman, L.B.; Sallan, S.E.; Weinberg, O.K. Role of CD81 and CD58 in Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Pediatric B Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2018, 40, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, X.-M.; Zhang, L.-P.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Lu, A.-D.; Chang, Y.; Zhu, H.-H.; Qin, Y.-Z.; Lai, Y.-Y.; Kong, Y.; Huang, X.-J.; et al. CD38+ CD58− Is an Independent Adverse Prognostic Factor in Paediatric Philadelphia Chromosome Negative B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Patients. Leuk. Res. 2016, 43, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ratei, R.; Sperling, C.; Karawajew, L.; Schott, G.; Schrappe, M.; Harbott, J.; Riehm, H.; Ludwig, W.-D. Immunophenotype and Clinical Characteristics of CD45-Negative and CD45-Positive Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Ann. Hematol. 1998, 77, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Behm, F.G.; Raimondi, S.C.; Schell, M.J.; Look, A.T.; Rivera, G.K.; Pui, C.-H. Lack of CD45 Antigen on Blast Cells in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Associated With Chromosomal Hyperdiploidy and Other Favorable Prognostic Features. Blood 1992, 79, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Mckenna, R.W.; Asplund, S.L.; Kroft, S.H. Immunophenotypic Analysis of Hematogones (B-Lymphocyte Precursors) and Neoplastic Lymphoblasts by 4-Color Flow Cytometry. Leuk. Lymphoma 2004, 45, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ou, D.-Y.; Luo, J.-M.; Ou, D.-L. CD20 and Outcome of Childhood Precursor B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2015, 37, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elghetany, M.T.; Patel, J. Assessment of CD24 Expression on Bone Marrow Neutrophilic Granulocytes: CD24 Is a Marker for the Myelocytic Stage of Development. Am. J. Hematol. 2002, 71, 348–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Raife, T.J.; Lager, D.J.; Kemp, J.D.; Dick, F.R. Expression of CD24 (BA-1) Predicts Monocytic Lineage in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1994, 101, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fischer, G.F.; Knapp, W. Signal transduction in lymphocytic and myeloid cells via cd24, a newmember of phosphoinositol-anchored membrane-molecules. J. Immunol. 1990, 144, 638–641. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kinjyo, I.; Matlawska-Wasowska, K.; Chen, X.; Monks, N.R.; Burke, P.; Winter, S.S.; Wilson, B.S. Characterization of the Anti-CD22 Targeted Therapy, Moxetumomab Pasudotox, for B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2017, 64, e26604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Borkhardt, A.; Wuchter, C.; Viehmann, S.; Pils, S.; Teigler-Schlegel, A.; Stanulla, M.; Zimmermann, M.; Ludwig, W.-D.; Janka-Schaub, G.; Schrappe, M.; et al. Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia – Combined Cytogenetic, Immunophenotypical and Molecular Analysis of 77 Cases. Leukemia 2002, 16, 1685–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Matarraz, S.; Hernandez-Campo, P.; Rivas, J.H.; Salvador, C.; Fernandez-Mosteirın, N.; Giralt, M.; Perdiguer, L.; Orfao, A. The Immunophenotype of Different Immature, Myeloid and B-Cell Lineage-Committed CD34 þ Hematopoietic Cells Allows Discrimination between Normal/Reactive and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Precursors. Leukemia 2008, 22, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lucio, P.; Gaipa, G.; van Lochem, E.; van Wering, E.; Porwit-MacDonald, A.; Faria, T.; Bjorklund, E.; Biondi, A. BIOMED-I Concerted Action Report: FLow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Precursor B-ALL with Standardized Triple-Stainings. Leukemia 2001, 15, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. De Zen, L.; Orfao, A.; Cazzaniga, G.; Masiero, L.; Cocito, M.; Spinelli, M.; Rivolta, A.; Biondi, A.; Zanesco, L.; Basso, G. Quantitative Multiparametric Immunophenotyping in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Correlation with Specific Genotype. I. ETV6/AML1 ALLs Identification. Leukemia 2000, 14, 1225–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. ten Hacken, E.; Sivina, M.; Kim, E.; O’Brien, S.; Wierda, W.G.; Ferrajoli, A.; Estrov, Z.; Keating, M.J.; Oellerich, T.; Scielzo, C.; et al. Functional Differences between IgM and IgD Signaling in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 2522–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. ten Hacken, E.; Gounari, M.; Ghia, P.; Burger, J.A. The Importance of B Cell Receptor Isotypes and Stereotypes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Leukemia 2019, 33, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dunphy, C.H.; Polski, J.M.; Evans, H.L.; Gardner, L.J. Evaluation of Bone Marrow Specimens With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia for CD34, CD15, CD117, and Myeloperoxidase. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2001, 125, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ball, E.D.; Schwarz, L.M.; Bloomfield, C.D. Expression of the CD15 Antigen on Normal and Leukemic Myeloid Cells: Effects of Neuraminidase and Variable Detection with a Panel of Monoclonal Antibodies. Mol. Immunol. 1991, 28, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Willier, S.; Rothamel, P.; Hastreiter, M.; Wilhelm, J.; Stenger, D.; Blaeschke, F.; Rohlfs, M.; Kaeuferle, T.; Schmid, I.; Albert, M.H.; et al. CLEC12A and CD33 Co-Expression as Preferential Target on Pediatric AML for Combinatorial Immunotherapy. Blood 2021, 138, 1037–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Campana, D.; Coustan-Smith, E.; Janossy, G. The Immunologic Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Leukemia. Blood 1990, 76, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yasmeen, S.; Rajkumar, A.; Grossman, H.; Szallasi, A. Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase (TdT)-Negative Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Pediatric Patients: Incidence and Clinical Significance. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2017, 20, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yoon, J.; Yun, J.W.; Jung, C.W.; Ju, H.Y.; Koo, H.H.; Kim, S.; Kim, H. Molecular Characteristics of Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase Negative Precursor B-cell Phenotype Burkitt Leukemia with IGH -MYC Rearrangement. Genes. Chromosomes Cancer 2020, 59, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pelák, O.; Kužílková, D.; Thürner, D.; Kiene, M.-L.; Stanar, K.; Stuchlý, J.; Vášková, M.; Starý, J.; Hrušák, O.; Stadler, H.; et al. Lymphocyte Enrichment Using CD81-Targeted Immunoaffinity Matrix: Lymphocyte Enrichment via CD81 Selection. Cytom. A 2017, 91, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Uckun, F.; Song, C. Lack of CD24 Antigen Expression in B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Associated with Intrinsic Radiation Resistance of Primary Clonogenic Blasts. Blood 1993, 81, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hrušák, O.; Trka, J.; Zuna, J.; Housková, J.; Bartůňková, J.; Starý, J. Aberrant Expression of KOR-SA3544 Antigen in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Predicts TEL-AML1 Negativity. Leukemia 1998, 12, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Coustan-Smith, E.; Song, G.; Clark, C.; Key, L.; Liu, P.; Mehrpooya, M.; Stow, P.; Su, X.; Shurtleff, S.; Pui, C.-H.; et al. New Markers for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Blood 2011, 117, 6267–6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 13 01374 g001 550
Figure 1. 2-dimendional dot-plots obtained with Flow Cytometry. Examples of immunophenotypic features of patients with BCP-ALL. Red population represents blast cells. Highlighted in green are the normal B-cells. (a) patient with Philadelphia chromosome. (b) patient with KMT2A gene rearrengement. (c) patient with TSLPR/CRLF2 antigen overexpression (Ph-like associated feature). (d) patient with hyperdiploidy.
Figure 1. 2-dimendional dot-plots obtained with Flow Cytometry. Examples of immunophenotypic features of patients with BCP-ALL. Red population represents blast cells. Highlighted in green are the normal B-cells. (a) patient with Philadelphia chromosome. (b) patient with KMT2A gene rearrengement. (c) patient with TSLPR/CRLF2 antigen overexpression (Ph-like associated feature). (d) patient with hyperdiploidy.
Genes 13 01374 g001
Table
Table 1. Immunophenotypic subtypes of BCP-ALL according to European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL) [12,13].
Table 1. Immunophenotypic subtypes of BCP-ALL according to European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL) [12,13].
BCP-ALL SubtypeCD10cyIgMsIgM and/or cyIgK or cyIgL
B-I (pro-B) ALL−−−
B-II (common) ALL+−−
B-III (pre-B)++−
B-IV (mature)−/+++
cyIgM—cytoplasmic IgM; sIgM—surface IgM; cyIgK—cytoplasmic Kappa light chain; cyIgL—cytoplasmic Lambda light chain. Additional subtype of BCP-ALL—Transitional pre-B-ALL subtype is characterized by presence of surface and cytoplasmic IgM but lack of cyIgK or cyIgL light chains [13].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulis, J.; Sędek, Ł.; Słota, Ł.; Perkowski, B.; Szczepański, T. Commonly Assessed Markers in Childhood BCP-ALL Diagnostic Panels and Their Association with Genetic Aberrations and Outcome Prediction. Genes 2022, 13, 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081374

AMA Style

Kulis J, Sędek Ł, Słota Ł, Perkowski B, Szczepański T. Commonly Assessed Markers in Childhood BCP-ALL Diagnostic Panels and Their Association with Genetic Aberrations and Outcome Prediction. Genes. 2022; 13(8):1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulis, Jan, Łukasz Sędek, Łukasz Słota, Bartosz Perkowski, and Tomasz Szczepański. 2022. "Commonly Assessed Markers in Childhood BCP-ALL Diagnostic Panels and Their Association with Genetic Aberrations and Outcome Prediction" Genes 13, no. 8: 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop