Next Article in Journal
Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Stimulation through Acetyl-11-Keto-Beta-Boswellic Acid (AKBA) Provides Neuroprotection in Ethidium Bromide-Induced Experimental Model of Multiple Sclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Potential Candidate Genes, Transcription Factors, and Biosynthetic Pathways for Phosphite Response in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Previous Article in Journal
State of the Art for Microhaplotypes
Previous Article in Special Issue
WGCNA Analysis Identifies the Hub Genes Related to Heat Stress in Seedling of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/genes13081323
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Source-To-Sink Transport of Sugar and Its Role in Male Reproductive Development

by
Jingbin Li
1,
Yu-Jin Kim
2 and
Dabing Zhang
1,3,*
1
Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea
3
School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(8), 1323; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081323
Submission received: 15 May 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 7 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Diversity of Plant Tolerance to Environmental Restraints)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sucrose is produced in leaf mesophyll cells via photosynthesis and exported to non-photosynthetic sink tissues through the phloem. The molecular basis of source-to-sink long-distance transport in cereal crop plants is of importance due to its direct influence on grain yield—pollen grains, essential for male fertility, are filled with sugary starch, and rely on long-distance sugar transport from source leaves. Here, we overview sugar partitioning via phloem transport in rice, especially where relevant for male reproductive development. Phloem loading and unloading in source leaves and sink tissues uses a combination of the symplastic, apoplastic, and/or polymer trapping pathways. The symplastic and polymer trapping pathways are passive processes, correlated with source activity and sugar gradients. In contrast, apoplastic phloem loading/unloading involves active processes and several proteins, including SUcrose Transporters (SUTs), Sugars Will Eventually be Exported Transporters (SWEETs), Invertases (INVs), and MonoSaccharide Transporters (MSTs). Numerous transcription factors combine to create a complex network, such as DNA binding with One Finger 11 (DOF11), Carbon Starved Anther (CSA), and CSA2, which regulates sugar metabolism in normal male reproductive development and in response to changes in environmental signals, such as photoperiod.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa), the monocot model plant, is a major crop, meeting the food demands of more than 50% of the global population [1,2]. Reproductive development, which connects the dominant diploid sporophytic and short haploid gametophytic stages, is a critical element in grain production [3]. The male reproductive organ, the stamen, consists of a filament and an anther containing multiple specialized tissues that generate mature male gametophytes, the pollen grains, via a series of developmental events such as meristem specification, cell differentiation, meiosis, mitosis, and starch accumulation [4,5]. Research on anther development is essential to increase our understanding of developmental biology and boost agricultural production reviewed by [4,5,6,7,8].
Sugars are the constituents of main anther, and play essential roles in cell structure formation, energy supply, and male fertility in response to environmental conditions [9]. In rice, the expression of Cell Wall Invertase 3 (OsCWIN3/OsINV4) correlates with sucrose accumulation and pollen sterility depending on temperature [10], while two MYB domain proteins, Carbon Starved Anther (CSA) and CSA2, regulate sugar partitioning and male fertility in response to photoperiod [11,12,13,14]. The sugar transporter OsXa13/OsSWEET11 plays essential roles in pollen development and disease resistance against bacterial blight [15,16].
Sugar transport processes from source leaves to anther sinks are thus directly involved in male fertility. This review aims to provide an overview of sugar transport and its role in anther development, focusing on the molecular basis of sugar partitioning from source to sink, and recent findings on how sugar metabolism impacts anther development.

2. Strategies of Source-to-Sink Sugar Partitioning

Carbon is fixed from carbon dioxide into carbohydrate in chloroplasts of leaf tissues, primarily mesophyll cells, and accumulated in the cytosol of the same cells. The energy demands of sink tissues, such as roots, flowers, and seeds, drive the export of sugars from the leaf, mainly in the form of sucrose, via long-distance transport in plant vasculature, the phloem [17]. Over half of the photo-assimilates (50–80%) are exported from source leaves to maintain non-photosynthetic sink tissues [18]. Carbohydrate partitioning from source-to-sink tissues comprises three elements [19]: phloem loading of sugars from source tissues; transportation in the sieve element of the phloem; phloem unloading of sugars to sink tissues [20].
Phloem is composed of several cell types, including parenchyma cells, sieve elements (SEs), and companion cells (CCs) [21,22]. Phloem loading is the first vital step in sugar’s long-distance transport—transferring the sugars from mesophyll cells to the SEs and CCs of the phloem [23,24,25]. Three different strategies are used for phloem loading by different plants according to the abundance of plasmodesmata, SUT activity, and the concentration gradient of photosynthates (Figure 1) [26].
The symplastic pathway is a passive loading process, driven by concentration gradients between mesophyll cells and phloem tissue (Figure 1A) [24,27], whereby the sucrose accumulated in mesophyll cells diffuses through plasmodesmata to reach phloem CCs [24,27]. Most tree species employ passive loading in the mesophyll cells, which meets the anatomical feature with high plasmodesmatal frequencies in the phloem of minor veins [26,28,29]. In most herbaceous plants, the apoplastic pathway is the main strategy for phloem loading [22]. Sucrose from mesophyll cells is actively exported to the apoplast by SWEET proteins (consuming energy), diffuses within the apoplast, and is actively loaded to phloem CCs via SUTs against a concentration gradient (Figure 1B) [22,28]. Polymer trapping, the third phloem-loading strategy, is an energy-consuming symplastic process adopted by a small number of specific plants (Figure 1C) [29]. For example, in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), and bugleweed (Ajuga reptans), sucrose diffuses into phloem CCs along the concentration gradient and is synthesized into raffinose-family oligosaccharides (RFOs); thus, larger sugars are retained in SE/CC complex due to the size of plasmodesmata [30,31]. In Verbascum phoenicum, RNA interference experiments demonstrate that the reduced expression of two GAS genes that drive RFO synthesis inhibits phloem transport and results in growth retardation [25].

3. Proteins Involved in Sugar Partitioning

3.1. Sucrose Transporters (SUTs)

Sucrose transporters (SUTs) act as symporters to import the sucrose from the apoplasm into phloem CCs against the concentration gradient, driven by the motive force generated by H+-ATPases (Figure 1B) [28,32]. The 12 transmembrane domains of the SUT protein forms a pore to transport sucrose across the plasma membrane [33].
The first sucrose transporter (SoSUT) was found in spinach (Spinacea oleracea) by an elegant yeast complementation strategy [34]. Nine and five SUTs have been found in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively [35,36]. Based on sequence, sub-cellular location, and activity, SUTs have been classified into three types: type I (specific to eudicots, plasma membrane–localized); type II (present in all plants, plasma membrane–localized); and type III (present in all plants, vacuolar membrane–localized) [37]. In rice, OsSUT1, OsSUT3, OsSUT4, and OsSUT5 are type II SUTs, and OsSUT2 is a type III tonoplast SUT (Table 1) [37].

3.2. Sugars Will Eventually Be Exported Transporters (SWEETs)

SWEETs are a group of evolutionally conserved genes expressed in eukaryotes, prokaryotes, and archaea [52,53]. These genes, encoding MtN3/saliva domain proteins, were initially found to encode glucose transporters [54], and have since been found to be capable of transporting a variety of mono- and di-saccharides [42,55,56,57]. According to their protein structures, SWEET proteins encode either one or two MtN3/saliva domains [58].
Rice encodes 21 SWEET proteins that are involved in multiple biological processes (Table 1) [58]. OsSWEET11, containing two MtN3/saliva domains, acts as a glucose uniporter in panicles and anthers [15]. Its knockdown mutant reveals defects in microspore development, suggesting a function in male development [15]. OsSWEET11 is also upregulated in response to bacterial infection by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [15]. OsSWEET14 has a similar disease response, and its knockout mutant showed growth retardation, reduced plant size, and insensitivity to bacterial infection [16]. An overexpressing OsSWEET5 line shows significant changes in leaf sugar levels, which indicates the function of OsSWEET5 in sugar metabolism and transport [42]. This transgenic line also showed low expression of genes involved in auxin signal transduction, suggesting a function for SWEETs in regulating the crosstalk between auxin and sugar in rice [42]. In addition, five SWEET genes, including OsSWEET1a, OsSWEET2a, OsSWEET4, OsSWEET11, OsSWEET15, are highly expressed in panicles, indicating a putative function in sugar transport during rice reproductive development [59].

3.3. Invertases (INVs)

Invertases (INVs) encode proteins that hydrolyze sucrose into glucose and fructose [60], classified according to sub-cellular location into vacuolar (VIN), cell wall (CWIN), or cytoplasmic (CIN) invertases (Table 1) [61,62]. CINs prefer a neutral pH of 7.0–7.8 in the cytosol, while VINs and CWINs have an optimal pH of 4.5–5.5 [61]. Rice has 19 invertase genes, including nine CWINs, two VINs, and eight VINs (Table 1) [63]. CWIN proteins bind to the cell wall and play essential roles in sugar transmembrane transport during phloem unloading [61].

3.4. Monosaccharide Transporters (MSTs)

Monosaccharide transporters (MSTs) are membrane proteins involved in the transmembrane transport of hexoses, hydrolyzed from sucrose by INVs, in sink tissues in the apoplastic pathway (Figure 1B) [64]. An Arabidopsis phylogeny of 53 MST proteins suggests seven subfamilies—AZT, XTPH, ERD, pGlcT, PLT, INT, and STP (Table 1)—many of whose expression patterns or function have not yet been characterized [65]. Among the seven subfamilies of MST proteins, AZT and XTPH proteins localize on the tonoplast and play essential roles in sugar transport to the tonoplast [66,67,68]. AtERD6, a member of ERD proteins, was proved to be involved in the transport of monosaccharides, whose expression was induced by abiotic stress [69]. pGlcT proteins are transporters of glucose, and PLT proteins are symporters of polyols and monosaccharides [70,71]. AtINT4, the first identified member of the INT proteins, exhibits H+ symporter activities for myoinositol in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Xenopus laevis oocytes [72]. MST members of the STP sub-family are H+/hexose cotransporters locating on plasma membranes, which transport a series of hexoses, including glucose, fructose, galactose, xylose, mannose, pentose, and ribose [64].
A slightly larger family of 64 MSTs has been found in rice; these proteins split into the same seven clades upon phylogenetic analysis [64]. Several members of the STP subfamily were reported to have monosaccharide transport functions (Table 1). OsMST3 is required to accumulate monosaccharides, the substrate for cellulose synthesis, during cell wall synthesis [46]. OsMST5, highly expressed in panicles, is associated with pollen growth [47]. Moreover, OsMST8 is directly regulated by CSA, suggesting a function for OsMST8 during anther development [11].

4. Roles of Sugar Transporters in Phloem Loading and Unloading

Photosynthesis—“source activity”—and sink energy utilization—“sink strength”—combine to raise plant productivity [20,73]. Understanding the processes of phloem loading in source leaves and unloading in sink tissues can improve source activity and sink strength, leading to higher grain yields (Figure 2). After long-distance phloem transport from source tissues, sugar (mainly sucrose) is unloaded in sink organs; however, this process will lead to sucrose accumulation in sink tissues (reduced sink strength), resulting in reduced efficiency in sugar transport and source activity (Figure 2) [74].
In Arabidopsis, AtSUC2 is expressed in phloem CCs of minor leaf veins, which are supposed to be involved in the source-to-sink transition [75,76]. An AtSUT2 T-DNA insertion mutant line exhibits decreased sucrose exports from leaves, resulting in sucrose accumulation in leaves, and delayed root growth and flowering [77]. OsSUT1, a type II SUT like AtSUC2, is highly expressed in leaves, stems, and grains; however, knockdown lines of OsSUT1 do not show sucrose accumulation in source leaves [38,39]. OsSUT3, another type II SUT, is preferentially expressed in pollen, suggesting a function in pollen development and maturity rather than phloem loading in source leaves [41]. OsSUT2, a type III SUT, is involved in sucrose transfer across the tonoplast from the vacuole lumen to the cytosol in rice [40].
SWEETs transport mono- or di-saccharides across membranes for phloem transport [78]. In Arabidopsis, AtSWEET11/12 localizes in the plasma membrane of vascular tissues and participates in phloem transport [55]. Maize ZmSWEET4c functions in hexose transport during seed development, and its mutation demonstrates a lack of hexose transport and defect in seed filling [79]. In rice, OsSWEET11 and OsSWEET14, two response factors to bacterial infection, also show essential roles in grain filling, whose mutants reveal defective in grain filling, resulting in increased starch accumulation in the pericarp [16,80,81]. OsSWEET15, another symporter highly expressed in rice caryopses, is necessary for sucrose efflux from caryopses to grains during seed filling [45]. OsSWEET5 encodes a galactose transporter, whose overexpression causes growth retardation and precocious senescence in rice seedlings [42]. These SWEET proteins showed important roles in grain filling, demonstrating their biological function of sucrose transfer from caryopses (source) to grains (sink).
Cell wall invertases (CWINs) play important roles in apoplasmic unloading, decreasing the concentration of sucrose in sink tissues to improve sink strength [61,82]. In rice, grain yield significantly decreased when the expression of OsCWIN2 (GIF1) was suppressed [83], and a similar phenotype is observed in ZmCWIN2 (Incw2) mutants in maize (Zea mays) [80]. VfCWIN1 in Vicia faba, a dicot species, is also reported to impact seed size [81]. Moreover, OsCWIN3 (INV4) has high expression in rice anthers, and affects male fertility in response to temperature variations [10].
During the apoplasmic unloading, sucrose is hydrolyzed into hexoses by CWINs, which results in monosaccharides accumulation in unloading tissues. Plasma membrane-localized MSTs are transporters of monosaccharides, which are responsible for hexoses partitioning to sink tissues [84]. In rice, monosaccharides transport by OsMST1–8 has been demonstrated [46,47,85,86,87,88]. Among them, OsMST5, OsMST7, and OsMST8 have been shown to be involved in rice anther development [11,49,89].

5. Sugar Balance and Signaling Transduction

Plants photosynthesize carbohydrates by converting carbon dioxide into glucose during daylight, with sugar accumulation restricted by CO2 and light density [89,90]. Carbohydrates accumulate in leaves linearly through the day, peaking at dusk, but plants require energy throughout the nighttime hours as well. The plant circadian cycle regulates photosynthate partitioning to maintain energy balances in all plant tissues throughout the day and night [91]. In Arabidopsis, ~50% of the photosynthate accumulates as starch in the leaves during the day for degrading, to supply the sugar demands of non-photosynthetic tissues at night [92]. The rate of starch degradation at night is approximately linear, and ~95% of starch is utilized at the end of the night [93].
Further studies found that the circadian clock regulates the rates of starch degradation to coordinate the sugar supply and growth in Arabidopsis [91]. For example, three circadian-controlled transcription factors, PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 3, 4, and 5 (PIF3, PIF4, and PIF5), precisely regulate the hypocotyl growth at the end of the night, which is an apparent energy-consuming process [94].The clock sets the pace of degradation to govern the starch exhausted at dawn, and this mechanism adjusts to photoperiod changes: when dark periods are extended from 12 h to 16 h, starch degradation occurs more slowly to reach the same minimum sugar levels at the end of the night [95,96]. A circadian-controlled gene, SIGMA FACTOR5 (SIG5), encodes a transcription factor that controls the expression of several chloroplast genes, revealing the influence of core clock on the photosynthesis [97].
In addition to their fundamental functions in carbon and energy metabolism and polymer biosynthesis, sugars have feedback effects on the circadian clock [98]. In Arabidopsis, sugars gradually accumulate after sunrise at dawn, then repress the expression of PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 7 (AtPRR7) and relieve repression on CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1), modulating the phase of the circadian clock [98].
Sugars also act as signal transducers in a range of biological processes that are also modulated by hormones, such as seed germination, growth and development, and flowering [99,100]. Glucose has been shown to regulate genes involved in abscisic acid (ABA) hormone biosynthesis and signaling, which is antagonistic with the phytohormone ethylene [101]. An excess of sucrose can rescue a late-flowering phenotype as well as leaf morphogenesis and flowering in the dark. Sucrose, rather than auxin, levels play a vital role in apical dominance by suppressing the key regulator for bud dormancy, BRC1 [102]. Sugar accumulation also influences the juvenile–adult transition by suppressing the negative regulator miR156 and relieving repression on the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) genes, the promoting factor of miR172 [103,104].

6. Sugar Regulatory Network

Phloem loading is a complex process, achieved by a variety of pathways in different plants under different conditions; while the precise mechanisms in rice are not yet clear, a better understanding of this process may lead to improvements in grain production. Electron microscopy on rice leaf has revealed that xylem parenchyma cells are well-connected by plasmodesmata, suggesting the use of the symplastic pathway in rice phloem transport (Figure 1A) [105]. However, a later study suggests use of the apoplastic pathway (Figure 1B), as the expression of AtSUC2 under control of the Arabidopsis Phloem Protein 2 promoter (AtpPP2) in rice enhances phloem loading and boosts grain yield by 16% compared with the wild-type [106]. OsSUT1 is highly expressed in the phloem companion cells of source leaves, and the ossut1 mutant shows defects in growth and grain filling [43]. Blocking sugar transmembrane loading in rice by overexpressing a yeast invertase limits normal growth and grain filling, proving that the apoplastic pathway plays an essential role in rice phloem loading [43]. In summary, the symplastic and apoplastic pathways both appear to play a role in rice phloem loading, and the relative importance of the two pathways and their specific mechanisms of action, specifically under different environmental conditions, would benefit from further study.
Several regulators of sugar transporters involved in the apoplastic pathway in rice have been identified, and suggest a complex network of regulation that responds to environmental conditions. Rice DNA BINDING WITH ONE FINGER 11 (OsDOF11) modulates sugar transport by regulating the expression of several sugar transporter genes, including OsSUT1, OsSUT3, OsSUT4, OsSUT5, OsSWEET11 and OsSWEET14, and its mutant has defects in plant height and panicle development (Figure 3) [107]. Carbon Starved Anther (CSA) is reported to be a R2R3 MYB transcription factor regulating sugar transport during anther development, and also regulates OsSWEET14 expression (Figure 3) [11,44]. The csa mutant reveals a photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterile phenotype due to the disruption of sugar supply to the anther under different photoperiods: male-sterile under short-day conditions but only semi-sterile under long-day conditions [11,12]. Interestingly, CSA2, another MYB transcription factor, reveals the reverse phenotypes, being fertile under short-day and semi-sterile under long-day conditions [13]. A further study suggests that CSA2 shares common downstream genes involved in sugar metabolism with CSA including OsSWEET6a, OsINV4, OsAZT3, OsSPT17, and OsSPT27 (Figure 3) [13,44].
In plants, fluctuations in daylength are received in the leaves, and then a downstream signal, for instance, florigen, can be activated and move to other organs through vascular bundles [108]. Rice is a facultative short-day flowering plant, which can also flower under long-day conditions with a delayed flowering time [109,110]. CSA has a higher expression level in rice anthers under short-day conditions than long-day conditions, while the expression of CSA2 reveals the opposite variations under different day-length conditions [12,13]. Transcriptome data reveal that core components of the circadian clock, CCA1 and PRR95, play vital roles in sensing the photoperiod signals, and are then transduced to anthers [13,44]. CSA and CSA2 are likely to be regulated by these photoperiod signals, then control the source-to-sink transport via downstream sugar transporters to influence anther development (Figure 3) [13,44]. These results suggest the importance of these transcription factors in sensing environmental signals and regulating normal growth, especially anther development.

7. Conclusions

Hybrid rice has made great contributions to the increase in rice yield, meeting the food demands of expanding populations [111]. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of rice male reproductive development is crucial for hybrid rice breeding [4,5]. In this paper, we reviewed the source-to-sink transport processes of photosynthetic accumulation and the roles that sugar transporters play in the energy supply of the anthers during the male reproductive stages. While the overview of the regulatory network is limited, it provides new sights into how environmental signals influence sugar translocation via a series of transcription factors and proteins. In the future, new tools, including single-cell sequencing and hormone reporters, will provide new opportunities to elucidate the linkage of environmental clues, sugar transport and signaling, and male reproductive development [112,113]. The development of gene editing technology and crop breeding technology, such as CRISPR/Cas9 and Haploid-Inducer Mediated Genome Editing, will improve the understanding of the mechanisms and accelerate improvements in crop traits [114,115]. Research on the regulatory processes of sugar transport and their functions in male fertility have important implications for developmental biology and agricultural production.

Author Contributions

D.Z. conceived this paper. J.L. wrote the original draft. Y.-J.K. helped to revise the manuscript. D.Z. supervised and completed the writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970803), the Innovative Research Team, Ministry of Education, and 111 Project (B14016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Natalie Betts for providing advice on manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Izawa, T.; Shimamoto, K. Becoming a model plant: The importance of rice to plant science. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Delseny, M.; Salses, J.; Cooke, R.; Sallaud, C.; Regad, F.; Lagoda, P.; Guiderdoni, E.; Ventelon, M.; Brugidou, C.; Ghesquière, A. Rice genomics: Present and future. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, D.; Yang, L. Specification of tapetum and microsporocyte cells within the anther. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 17, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, D.; Luo, X.; Zhu, L. Cytological analysis and genetic control of rice anther development. J. Genet. Genom. 2011, 38, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, D.; Wilson, Z.A. Stamen specification and anther development in rice. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 2342–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Scott, R.J.; Spielman, M.; Dickinson, H. Stamen structure and function. Plant Cell 2004, 16 (Suppl. S1), S46–S60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, H. Molecular genetic analyses of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 393–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mercier, R.; Grelon, M. Meiosis in plants: Ten years of gene discovery. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 120, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stanley, R.G. Pollen Chemistry and Tube Growth. Pollen 1971, 131–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oliver, S.N.; van Dongen, J.; Alfred, S.C.; Mamun, E.A.; Zhao, X.; Saini, H.S.; Fernandes, S.F.; Blanchard, C.; Sutton, B.G.; Geigenberger, P.; et al. Cold-induced repression of the rice anther-specific cell wall invertase gene OSINV4 is correlated with sucrose accumulation and pollen sterility. Plant, Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1534–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, H.; Liang, W.; Yang, X.; Luo, X.; Jiang, N.; Ma, H.; Zhang, D. Carbon Starved Anther Encodes a MYB Domain Protein That Regulates Sugar Partitioning Required for Rice Pollen Development. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 672–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, H.; Xu, C.; He, Y.; Zong, J.; Yang, X.; Si, H.; Sun, Z.; Hu, J.; Liang, W.; Zhang, D. Mutation in CSA creates a new photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterile line applicable for hybrid rice seed production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, D.; Li, J.; Sun, L.; Hu, Y.; Yu, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, F.; Hou, H.; Liang, W.; Zhang, D. Two rice MYB transcription factors maintain male fertility in response to photoperiod by modulating sugar partitioning. New Phytol. 2021, 231, 1612–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, L.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, D.; Li, J.; Shi, J.; Hu, Y.; Yu, J.; Chen, X.; Chen, S.; Liang, W.; et al. Carbon Starved Anther modulates sugar and ABA metabolism to protect rice seed germination and seedling fitness. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 2405–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chu, Z.; Yuan, M.; Yao, J.; Ge, X.; Yuan, B.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Fu, B.; Li, Z.; Bennetzen, J.L.; et al. Promoter mutations of an essential gene for pollen development result in disease resistance in rice. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 1250–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Antony, G.; Zhou, J.; Huang, S.; Li, T.; Liu, B.; White, F.; Yang, B. Rice xa13 Recessive Resistance to Bacterial Blight Is Defeated by Induction of the Disease Susceptibility Gene Os-11N3. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3864–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lemoine, R.; La Camera, S.; Atanassova, R.; Dédaldéchamp, F.; Allario, T.; Pourtau, N.; Bonnemain, J.L.; Laloi, M.; Coutos-Thévenot, P.; Maurousset, L.; et al. Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kalt-Torres, W.; Kerr, P.S.; Usuda, H.; Huber, S.C. Diurnal changes in maize leaf photosynthesis: I. Carbon exchange rate, assimilate export rate, and enzyme activities. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Turgeon, R.; Wolf, S. Phloem Transport: Cellular Pathways and Molecular Trafficking. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Osorio, S.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Fernie, A.R. An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. White, P.J. Long-distance transport in the xylem and phloem. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 49–70. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, C.; Turgeon, R. Mechanisms of phloem loading. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 43, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lalonde, S.; Tegeder, M.; Throne-Holst, M.; Frommer, W.B.; Patrick, J.W. Phloem loading and unloading of sugars and amino acids. Plant, Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Turgeon, R.; Ayre, B.G. Pathways and Mechanisms of Phloem Loading. In Vascular Transport in Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 45–67. [Google Scholar]
  25. McCaskill, A.; Turgeon, R. Phloem loading in Verbascum phoeniceum L. depends on the synthesis of raffinose-family oligosaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19619–19624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rennie, E.A.; Turgeon, R. A comprehensive picture of phloem loading strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14162–14167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Turgeon, R.; Medville, R. The absence of phloem loading in willow leaves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 12055–12060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bush, D.R. Proton-coupled sugar and amino acid transporters in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 44, 513–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Turgeon, R. Phloem loading and plasmodesmata. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Haritatos, E.; Medville, R.; Turgeon, R. Minor vein structure and sugar transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2000, 211, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Comtet, J.; Turgeon, R.; Stroock, A.D. Phloem Loading through Plasmodesmata: A Biophysical Analysis. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 904–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ruan, Y.-L. Sucrose Metabolism: Gateway to Diverse Carbon Use and Sugar Signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 33–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Braun, D.M.; Slewinski, T.L. Genetic Control of Carbon Partitioning in Grasses: Roles of Sucrose Transporters and Tie-dyed Loci in Phloem Loading. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Riesmeier, J.W.; Willmitzer, L.; Frommer, W.B. Isolation and characterization of a sucrose carrier cDNA from spinach by functional expression in yeast. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 4705–4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aoki, N.; Hirose, T.; Scofield, G.N.; Whitfeld, P.R.; Furbank, R.T. The Sucrose Transporter Gene Family in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kühn, C. A Comparison of the Sucrose Transporter Systems of Different Plant Species. Plant Biol. 2003, 5, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lim, J.D.; Cho, J.-I.; Park, Y.-I.; Hahn, T.-R.; Choi, S.-B.; Jeon, J.-S. Sucrose transport from source to sink seeds in rice. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 126, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ishimaru, K.; Hirose, T.; Aoki, N.; Takahashi, S.; Ono, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Wu, J.; Saji, S.; Baba, T.; Ugaki, M.; et al. Antisense Expression of a Rice Sucrose Transporter OsSUT1 in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 1181–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Scofield, G.N.; Hirose, T.; Aoki, N.; Furbank, R.T. Involvement of the sucrose transporter, OsSUT1, in the long-distance pathway for assimilate transport in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 3155–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Eom, J.S.; Cho, J.I.; Reinders, A.; Lee, S.W.; Yoo, Y.; Tuan, P.Q.; Choi, S.B.; Bang, G.; Park, Y.I.; Cho, M.H.; et al. Impaired function of the tonoplast-localized sucrose transporter in rice, OsSUT2, limits the transport of vacuolar reserve sucrose and affects plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Eom, J.-S.; Choi, S.-B.; Ward, J.; Jeon, J.-S. The mechanism of phloem loading in rice (Oryza sativa). Mol. Cells 2012, 33, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, Y.; Liu, L.; Huang, W.; Yuan, M.; Zhou, F.; Li, X.; Lin, Y. Overexpression of OsSWEET5 in Rice Causes Growth Retardation and Precocious Senescence. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, G.; Wu, Y.; Ma, L.; Lin, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, W.; Ding, Y.; Chen, L. Phloem loading in rice leaves depends strongly on the apoplastic pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 3723–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, J.; Wang, D.; Sun, S.; Sun, L.; Zong, J.; Lei, Y.; Yu, J.; Liang, W.; Zhang, D. The regulatory role of CARBON STARVED ANTHER-mediated photoperiod-dependent male fertility in rice. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 955–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, J.; Luo, D.; Yang, B.; Frommer, W.B.; Eom, J. SWEET 11 and 15 as key players in seed filling in rice. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Toyofuku, K.; Kasahara, M.; Yamaguchi, J. Characterization and Expression of Monosaccharide Transporters (OsMSTs) in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ngampanya, B.; Sobolewska, A.; Takeda, T.; Toyofuku, K.; Narangajavana, J.; Ikeda, A.; Yamaguchi, J. Characterization of rice functional monosaccharide transporter, OsMST5. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Monfared, H.H.; Chew, J.K.; Azizi, P.; Xue, G.-P.; Ee, S.-F.; Kadkhodaei, S.; Hedayati, P.; Ismail, I.; Zainal, Z. Overexpression of a Rice Monosaccharide Transporter Gene (OsMST6) Confers Enhanced Tolerance to Drought and Salinity Stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 38, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, X.; Ren, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, F.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Zheng, T.; Cai, M.; Zeng, Z.; et al. OsVIN2 encodes a vacuolar acid invertase that affects grain size by altering sugar metabolism in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 1273–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jia, L.; Zhang, B.; Mao, C.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Wu, P.; Wu, Z. OsCYT-INV1 for alkaline/neutral invertase is involved in root cell development and reproductivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 2008, 228, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, E.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Lin, L.; Wang, Q.; Li, Q.; Ge, S.; Lu, B.R.; Wang, W.; et al. Research article Duplication and independent selection of cell-wall invertase genes GIF1 and OsCIN1 during rice evolution and domestication. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Saier, M.H. TCDB: The Transporter Classification Database for membrane transport protein analyses and information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D181–D186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hamada, M.; Wada, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Satoh, N. Ci-Rga, a gene encoding an MtN3/saliva family transmembrane protein, is essential for tissue differentiation during embryogenesis of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Differentiation 2005, 73, 364–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, L.-Q.; Hou, B.-H.; Lalonde, S.; Takanaga, H.; Hartung, M.L.; Qu, X.-Q.; Guo, W.-J.; Kim, J.-G.; Underwood, W.; Chaudhuri, B.; et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 2010, 468, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Chen, L.-Q.; Qu, X.-Q.; Hou, B.-H.; Sosso, D.; Osorio, S.; Fernie, A.R.; Frommer, W.B. Sucrose Efflux Mediated by SWEET Proteins as a Key Step for Phloem Transport. Science 2012, 335, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lin, I.W.; Sosso, D.; Chen, L.-Q.; Gase, K.; Kim, S.-G.; Kessler, D.; Klinkenberg, P.M.; Gorder, M.K.; Hou, B.-H.; Qu, X.-Q.; et al. Nectar secretion requires sucrose phosphate synthases and the sugar transporter SWEET9. Nature 2014, 508, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, L.-Q.; Lin, I.W.; Qu, X.-Q.; Sosso, D.; McFarlane, H.; Londoño, A.; Samuels, A.L.; Frommer, W.B. A Cascade of Sequentially Expressed Sucrose Transporters in the Seed Coat and Endosperm Provides Nutrition for the Arabidopsis Embryo. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Yuan, M.; Zhao, J.; Huang, R.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S. Rice MtN3/saliva/SWEET gene family: Evolution, expression profiling, and sugar transport. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yuan, M.; Wang, S. Rice MtN3/Saliva/SWEET Family Genes and Their Homologs in Cellular Organisms. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ruan, Y.L.; Jin, Y.; Huang, J. Capping invertase activity by its inhibitor: Roles and implications in sugar signaling, carbon allocation, senescence and evolution. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 983–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ruan, Y.-L.; Jin, Y.; Yang, Y.-J.; Li, G.-J.; Boyer, J.S. Sugar Input, Metabolism, and Signaling Mediated by Invertase: Roles in Development, Yield Potential, and Response to Drought and Heat. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 942–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shen, S.; Ma, S.; Liu, Y.; Liao, S.; Li, J.; Wu, L.; Kartika, D.; Mock, H.-P.; Ruan, Y.-L. Cell Wall Invertase and Sugar Transporters Are Differentially Activated in Tomato Styles and Ovaries During Pollination and Fertilization. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Ji, X.; Ende, W.V.D.; Van Laere, A.; Cheng, S.; Bennett, J. Structure, Evolution, and Expression of the Two Invertase Gene Families of Rice. J. Mol. Evol. 2005, 60, 615–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Deng, X.; An, B.; Zhong, H.; Yang, J.; Kong, W.; Li, Y. A Novel Insight into Functional Divergence of the MST Gene Family in Rice Based on Comprehensive Expression Patterns. Genes 2019, 10, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Johnson, D.A.; Hill, J.P.; Thomas, M.A. The monosaccharide transporter gene family in land plants is ancient and shows differential subfamily expression and expansion across lineages. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Schulz, A.; Beyhl, D.; Marten, I.; Wormit, A.; Neuhaus, E.; Poschet, G.; Büttner, M.; Schneider, S.; Sauer, N.; Hedrich, R. Proton-driven sucrose symport and antiport are provided by the vacuolar transporters SUC4 and TMT1/2. Plant J. 2011, 68, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wormit, A.; Trentmann, O.; Feifer, I.; Lohr, C.; Tjaden, J.; Meyer, S.; Schmidt, U.; Martinoia, E.; Neuhaus, H.E. Molecular Identification and Physiological Characterization of a Novel Monosaccharide Transporter from Arabidopsis Involved in Vacuolar Sugar Transport. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3476–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Aluri, S.; Buttner, M. Identification and functional expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar glucose transporter 1 and its role in seed germination and flowering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2537–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Yamada, K.; Osakabe, Y.; Mizoi, J.; Nakashima, K.; Fujita, Y.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Functional Analysis of an Arabidopsis thaliana Abiotic Stress-inducible Facilitated Diffusion Transporter for Monosaccharides. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 1138–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Cho, M.-H.; Lim, H.; Shin, D.H.; Jeon, J.-S.; Bhoo, S.H.; Park, Y.-I.; Hahn, T. Role of the plastidic glucose translocator in the export of starch degradation products from the chloroplasts in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Klepek, Y.-S.; Volke, M.; Konrad, K.R.; Wippel, K.; Hoth, S.; Hedrich, R.; Sauer, N. Arabidopsis thaliana POLYOL/MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORTERS 1 and 2: Fructose and xylitol/H+ symporters in pollen and young xylem cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schneider, S.; Schneidereit, A.; Konrad, K.; Hajirezaei, M.-R.; Gramann, M.; Hedrich, R.; Sauer, N. Arabidopsis INOSITOL TRANSPORTER4 Mediates High-Affinity H+ Symport of Myoinositol across the Plasma Membrane. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Kaschuk, G.; Hungria, M.; Leffelaar, P.A.; Giller, K.E.; Kuyper, T.W. Differences in photosynthetic behaviour and leaf senescence of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill) dependent on N2 fixation or nitrate supply. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Paul, M.J.; Pellny, T.K. Carbon metabolite feedback regulation of leaf photosynthesis and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Wright, K.M.; Roberts, A.G.; Martens, H.J.; Sauer, N.; Oparka, K.J. Structural and Functional Vein Maturation in Developing Tobacco Leaves in Relation to AtSUC2 Promoter Activity. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1555–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Truernit, E.; Sauer, N. The promoter of the Arabidopsis thaliana SUC2 sucrose-H+ symporter gene directs expression of β-glucuronidase to the phloem: Evidence for phloem loading and unloading by SUC2. Planta 1995, 196, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gottwald, J.R.; Krysan, P.J.; Young, J.C.; Evert, R.F.; Sussman, M.R. Genetic evidence for the in planta role of phloem-specific plasma membrane sucrose transporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13979–13984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Han, L.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, G.; Lan, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.C. Molecular mechanism of substrate recognition and transport by the AtSWEET13 sugar transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10089–10094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Sosso, D.; Luo, D.; Li, Q.-B.; Sasse, J.; Yang, J.; Gendrot, G.; Suzuki, M.; Koch, K.E.; Mccarty, D.R.; Chourey, P.S.; et al. Seed filling in domesticated maize and rice depends on SWEET-mediated hexose transport. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1489–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cheng, W.H.; Taliercio, E.W.; Chourey, P.S. The Miniature1 Seed Locus of Maize Encodes a Cell Wall Invertase Required for Normal Development of Endosperm and Maternal Cells in the Pedicel. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 971–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Weber, H.; Borisjuk, L.; Wobus, U. Weber-Controlling seed development and seed size in Vicia faba a role for seed. Plant J. 1996, 10, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ruan, Y.L.; Chourey, P.S.; Delmer, D.P.; Perez-Grau, L. The Differential Expression of Sucrose Synthase in Relation to Diverse Patterns of Carbon Partitioning in Developing Cotton Seed. Plant Physiol. 1997, 115, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Wang, E.; Wang, J.; Zhu, X.; Hao, W.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Zhang, L.; He, W.; Lu, B.; Lin, H.; et al. Control of rice grain-filling and yield by a gene with a potential signature of domestication. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1370–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Slewinski, T.L. Diverse Functional Roles of Monosaccharide Transporters and their Homologs in Vascular Plants: A Physiological Perspective. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 641–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, C.; Wei, G.; Wei, X.; Xu, H.; Wang, M.; Ouwerkerk, P.B.F.; Zhu, Z. Molecular cloning, functional characterization and expression analysis of a novel monosaccharide transporter gene OsMST6 from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 2008, 228, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nguyen, G.N.; Hailstones, D.L.; Wilkes, M.; Sutton, B.G. DROUGHT STRESS: Role of Carbohydrate Metabolism in Drought-Induced Male Sterility in Rice Anthers*. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2010, 196, 346–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Wei, X.; Chai, C.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, B.; Xiao, G.; Ouwerkerk, P.B.F.; Wang, M.; et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a monosaccharide transporter gene OsMST4 from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 439–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mamun, E.; Alfred, S.; Cantrill, L.; Overall, R.; Sutton, B. Effects of chilling on male gametophyte development in rice. Cell Biol. Int. 2006, 30, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sharkey, T.D. Understanding carbon partitioning and its role in determining plant growth. Plant, Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 1963–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Scialdone, A.; Mugford, S.; Feike, D.; Skeffington, A.; Borrill, P.; Graf, A.; Smith, A.M.; Howard, M. Arabidopsis plants perform arithmetic division to prevent starvation at night. eLife 2013, 2, e00669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Graf, A.; Smith, A.M. Starch and the clock: The dark side of plant productivity. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zeeman, S.C.; Rees, T.A. Changes in carbohydrate metabolism and assimilate export in starch-excess mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22, 1445–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Smith, A.M.; Stitt, M. Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 1126–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Soy, J.; Leivar, P.; González-Schain, N.; Sentandreu, M.; Prat, S.; Quail, P.H.; Monte, E. Phytochrome-imposed oscillations in PIF3 protein abundance regulate hypocotyl growth under diurnal light/dark conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012, 71, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Graf, A.; Schlereth, A.; Stitt, M.; Smith, A.M. Circadian control of carbohydrate availability for growth in Arabidopsis plants at night. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9458–9463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Stitt, M.; Zeeman, S.C. Starch turnover: Pathways, regulation and role in growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Noordally, Z.B.; Ishii, K.; Atkins, K.A.; Wetherill, S.J.; Kusakina, J.; Walton, E.J.; Kato, M.; Azuma, M.; Tanaka, K.; Hanaoka, M.; et al. Circadian Control of Chloroplast Transcription by a Nuclear-Encoded Timing Signal. Science 2013, 339, 1316–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Haydon, M.; Mielczarek, O.; Robertson, F.C.; Hubbard, K.; Webb, A. Photosynthetic entrainment of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock. Nature 2013, 502, 689–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Weber, H.; Borisjuk, L.; Wobus, U. Molecular physiology of legume seed development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 253–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rolland, F.; Moore, B.; Sheen, J. Sugar Sensing and Signaling in Plants. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S185–S205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Leon, P.; Sheen, J. Sugar and hormone connections. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mason, M.G.; Ross, J.J.; Babst, B.A.; Wienclaw, B.N.; Beveridge, C.A. Sugar demand, not auxin, is the initial regulator of apical dominance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6092–6097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Hyun, Y.; Richter, R.; Coupland, G. Competence to Flower: Age-Controlled Sensitivity to Environmental Cues. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Choudhary, A.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, N.; Kaur, H. Molecular cues of sugar signaling in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Botha, C.E.; Aoki, N.; Scofield, G.N.; Liu, L.; Furbank, R.T.; White, R.G. A xylem sap retrieval pathway in rice leaf blades: Evidence of a role for endocytosis? J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 2945–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, L.; Lu, Q.; Wen, X.; Lu, C. Enhanced sucrose loading improves rice yield by increasing grain size. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2848–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Wu, Y.; Lee, S.-K.; Yoo, Y.; Wei, J.; Kwon, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-W.; Jeon, J.-S.; An, G. Rice Transcription Factor OsDOF11 Modulates Sugar Transport by Promoting Expression of Sucrose Transporter and SWEET Genes. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Corbesier, L.; Vincent, C.; Jang, S.; Fornara, F.; Fan, Q.; Searle, I.; Giakountis, A.; Farrona, S.; Gissot, L.; Turnbull, C.; et al. FT Protein Movement Contributes to Long-Distance Signaling in Floral Induction of Arabidopsis. Science 2007, 316, 1030–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yano, M.; Kojima, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Lin, H.; Sasaki, T. Genetic Control of Flowering Time in Rice, a Short-Day Plant. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1425–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, Y.-S.; An, G. Regulation of flowering time in rice. J. Plant Biol. 2015, 58, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yuan, L.P. Hybrid rice technology for food security in the world. Int. Rice Comm. Newsl. 2004, 53, 24–25. [Google Scholar]
  112. Rich-Griffin, C.; Stechemesser, A.; Finch, J.; Lucas, E.; Ott, S.; Schäfer, P. Single-Cell Transcriptomics: A High-Resolution Avenue for Plant Functional Genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Balcerowicz, M.; Shetty, K.N.; Jones, A.M. Fluorescent biosensors illuminating plant hormone research. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 590–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, B.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, H. Development of a Haploid-Inducer Mediated Genome Editing System for Accelerating Maize Breeding. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014, 346, 1258096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 13 01323 g001 550
Figure 1. Three strategies for phloem loading. (A) Symplastic pathway: sucrose accumulates in mesophyll cells and is passively translocated to the phloem through plasmodesmata (PD) along the concentration gradient. (B) Apoplastic pathway: sucrose is exported to the apoplast by SWEETs and, after diffusion, imported into the phloem by SUTs. (C) Polymer trapping: sucrose is passively exported to phloem companion cells and synthesized into RFOs that can only move into sieve element cells due to their larger molecular mass.
Figure 1. Three strategies for phloem loading. (A) Symplastic pathway: sucrose accumulates in mesophyll cells and is passively translocated to the phloem through plasmodesmata (PD) along the concentration gradient. (B) Apoplastic pathway: sucrose is exported to the apoplast by SWEETs and, after diffusion, imported into the phloem by SUTs. (C) Polymer trapping: sucrose is passively exported to phloem companion cells and synthesized into RFOs that can only move into sieve element cells due to their larger molecular mass.
Genes 13 01323 g001
Genes 13 01323 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagrams of sugar source-to-sink transport in rice. (A) High source activity in source leaves promotes phloem transport. (B) High sink strength results in high sugar demand, increasing the sugar transport.
Figure 2. Schematic diagrams of sugar source-to-sink transport in rice. (A) High source activity in source leaves promotes phloem transport. (B) High sink strength results in high sugar demand, increasing the sugar transport.
Genes 13 01323 g002
Genes 13 01323 g003 550
Figure 3. Sugar transport genes regulated by DOF11, CSA, and CSA2 in rice.
Figure 3. Sugar transport genes regulated by DOF11, CSA, and CSA2 in rice.
Genes 13 01323 g003
Table
Table 1. Proteins involved in sugar metabolism in rice.
Table 1. Proteins involved in sugar metabolism in rice.
Gene FamilyNumber of GenesReported Genes/Reference
SUT5SUT1 [38,39];
SUT2 [40];
SUT3 [41];
SUT4, SUT5 [35]
SWEET21SWEET5 [42];
SWEET6a [43,44];
SWEET6b [44];
SWEET11 [15];
SWEET14 [16];
SWEET15 [45]
MST64
AZT subfamily6AZT3 [13]
ERD subfamily6
pGlcT subfamily4
Xylose subfamily2
STP subfamily15MST1, MST2, MST3 [46];
MST5 [47];
MST6 [48];
MST8 [11];
SPT17, SPT27 [43,44]
PLT subfamily28
INT subfamily3
Invertases18
VIN2VIN2 [49]
CIN8CIN8/Cyt-INV1 [50]
CWIN8GIF1 [51];
INV4 [10];
CWIN6 [44]
The shaded areas represent subfamilies of these proteins.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Zhang, D. Source-To-Sink Transport of Sugar and Its Role in Male Reproductive Development. Genes 2022, 13, 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081323

AMA Style

Li J, Kim Y-J, Zhang D. Source-To-Sink Transport of Sugar and Its Role in Male Reproductive Development. Genes. 2022; 13(8):1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jingbin, Yu-Jin Kim, and Dabing Zhang. 2022. "Source-To-Sink Transport of Sugar and Its Role in Male Reproductive Development" Genes 13, no. 8: 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop