Next Article in Journal
Association of HOXC8 Genetic Polymorphisms with Multi-Vertebral Number and Carcass Weight in Dezhou Donkey
Next Article in Special Issue
The Telomeric Repeats of HHV-6A Do Not Determine the Chromosome into Which the Virus Is Integrated
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Characteristics and In Silico Analysis of Cystinuria Caused by a Novel SLC3A1 Mutation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/genes13112174
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Suicide-Related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, rs4918918 and rs10903034: Association with Dementia in Older Adults

by
Olga Abramova
1,2,*,
Kristina Soloveva
1,
Yana Zorkina
1,2,
Dmitry Gryadunov
3,
Anna Ikonnikova
3,
Elena Fedoseeva
3,
Marina Emelyanova
3,
Aleksandra Ochneva
1,2,
Nika Andriushchenko
2,4,
Konstantin Pavlov
2,
Olga Pavlova
2,
Valeriya Ushakova
1,2,5,
Timur Syunyakov
1,6,
Alisa Andryushchenko
1,
Olga Karpenko
1,
Victor Savilov
1,
Marat Kurmishev
1,
Denis Andreuyk
1,5,
Olga Gurina
2,
Vladimir Chekhonin
2,7,
Georgy Kostyuk
1,8 and
Anna Morozova
1,2add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Mental-Health Clinic No. 1 Named after N.A. Alekseev, Zagorodnoe Highway 2, 115191 Moscow, Russia
2
Department of Basic and Applied Neurobiology, V. Serbsky Federal Medical Research Centre of Psychiatry and Narcology, Kropotkinsky per. 23, 119034 Moscow, Russia
3
Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
4
Department of Biology, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Ruyi Rd. 299, Shenzhen 518172, China
5
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
6
International Centre for Education and Research in Neuropsychiatry (ICERN), Samara State Medical University, 443016 Samara, Russia
7
Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia
8
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Moscow State University of Food Production”, Volokolamskoye Highway 11, 125080 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(11), 2174; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112174
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Architecture in Complex Traits)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dementia has enormous implications for patients and the health care system. Genetic markers are promising for detecting the risk of cognitive impairment. We hypothesized that genetic variants associated with suicide risk might significantly increase the risk of cognitive decline because suicide in older adults is often a consequence of cognitive impairment. We investigated several single-nucleotide polymorphisms that were initially associated with suicide risk in dementia older adults and identified the APOE gene alleles. The study was performed with subjects over the age of 65: 112 patients with dementia and 146 healthy volunteers. The MMSE score was used to assess cognitive functions. Study participants were genotyped using real-time PCR (APOE: rs429358, rs7412; genes associated with suicide: rs9475195, rs7982251, rs2834789, rs358592, rs4918918, rs3781878, rs10903034, rs165774, rs16841143, rs11833579 rs10898553, rs7296262, rs3806263, and rs2462021). Genotype analysis revealed the significance of APOEε4, APOEε2, and rs4918918 (SORBS1) when comparing dementia and healthy control groups. The association of APOEε4, APOEε2, and rs10903034 (IFNLR1) with the overall MMSE score was indicated. The study found an association with dementia of rs4918918 (SORBS1) and rs10903034 (IFNLR1) previously associated with suicide and confirmed the association of APOEε4 and APOEε2 with dementia.

1. Introduction

Neurocognitive disorders, especially severe dementia, have enormous implications for patients, their families, the health care system, and the economy. Approximately 50 million people suffer from dementia. This number is expected to triple by 2050 [1,2,3]. When dementia develops, it primarily affects memory and other cognitive functions, making daily life activities challenging and affecting orientation in time and space and speech [4]. The costs of disability caused by dementia account for a significant portion of the economic burden. In addition, family members of dementia patients suffer from increased emotional stress and depression, which affect their ability to work and contribute to the global cost of neurocognitive impairment [2]. Dementia can be caused by a wide range of diseases and lesions in the brain. Some common degenerative dementias in the elderly are Alzheimer’s disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies, vascular dementia, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and Parkinson’s disease [5].
The most effective interventions that could delay or stop the progression of neurocognitive decline would be those initiated during the mild cognitive impairment phase or before the onset of any symptoms. Preventive therapy could significantly delay the onset of the disease, which in turn would improve the patient’s quality of life [6,7]. However, there are still no ways to diagnose the onset of cognitive decline. One such way might be to identify various biomarkers that could detect the onset of cognitive decline with a high degree of probability. Finding biomarkers would not only help to identify the risk of developing dementia but would also be crucial for monitoring the effects of treatment, which is also important for designing therapy. It could also help to objectify the effectiveness of new treatments in the long term [8,9]. However, there are currently no biomarkers recommended for clinical use.
Genetic markers are promising for detecting the risk of cognitive impairment because overall cognitive ability is substantially influenced by genetic factors since it depends on changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins. Various mechanisms that have genetic components are thought to underlie pathological cognitive changes. The heritability of AD with late manifestation is 58-79%, while for AD with early manifestation, it is over 90%. Collaborative research by many scientific groups has accumulated a wealth of data on the genetics of AD [10,11] and has identified multiple loci associated with the disease [12,13]. The most studied, but not the most comprehensive, genetic risk factor for AD is the presence of the ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene in an individual. This allele is found in 20–25% of patients with AD, increasing the risk of developing the disease threefold in heterozygous carriers and 15-fold in homozygous carriers [13,14]. In addition, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using samples from nearly 300,000 people have successfully identified more than 100 genome-wide significant loci associated with cognitive functions [15,16]. These functions include neurogenesis, regulation of nervous system development, neuronal differentiation, and regulation of cell development [16]. However, identifying single genes that could predict cognitive impairment with a high probability is challenging. A likely explanation is that dementia is a multifactorial disease in which multiple genes with small individual effects contribute to overall risk. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) alone generally have a small effect on disease risk and cannot be used as independent prognostic markers. Nevertheless, it is hypothesized that a combination of certain genes could be quite successful in identifying people at high risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases, but this requires the identification of risk genes.
In our work, we investigated the relationship between several SNPs that were initially associated with suicide risk and indicators of cognitive decline in dementia. We hypothesized that these genes might affect the overall risk of cognitive decline because suicide in older adults is often caused by mental illnesses, including depression, anxiety disorder, insomnia, AD, and vascular dementia. All these conditions are closely related to cognitive impairment, which plays a role in suicide attempts among older adults. The loss of some cognitive abilities in aging (dysfunctional cognitive control, executive function, and problem-solving) is a risk factor; such impairments impede coping with daily life problems and thus increase the risk of suicide. Overall, the extent to which cognitive aging explains the higher suicide rate in older adults remains unclear, but those diagnosed with dementia are known to be at a significantly higher risk of suicide than their healthy peers, having a 54% increased risk within the first year of diagnosis [17,18,19]. On a total sample of 594,674 patients, it was shown that patients younger than 65 and within 3 months of diagnosis had a 6.69 times higher risk of suicide than patients without dementia [20]. For this reason, it is necessary to consider the factor of increased risk of suicide when studying the features of cognitive impairment in aging. Presumably, the genetic factor may also have some significance, which is yet to be evaluated.
Suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, and suicide are known to be largely inherited phenotypes [21]. There is evidence that the risk of suicide is increased fivefold in offspring whose parents have a history of suicide attempts [22]. Twin studies have estimated an inheritance rate of 17-55% for suicide and suicide attempts [23,24], while SNP-based estimates of suicide attempt inheritance were much more modest at 2–6% [25,26]. This heterogeneity of data indicates that the genetic epidemiology of suicide remains poorly understood [27]. In addition, there are currently few studies examining biomarkers of suicide risk in older adults, so this is a current challenge [27].
We suggested that genetic factors associated directly with suicide risk might also play a role in cognitive impairment in the elderly. We found it interesting to study the polymorphisms associated with suicide in a dementia cohort. In our study, we selected some SNPs that have been associated with suicidal behavior in earlier studies—rs9475195, rs7982251, rs3781878, rs165774 [28], rs2834789, rs10898553 [29], rs358592 [30], rs4918918, rs2462021 [31], rs10903034 [32], rs16841143 [26], rs11833579 [33], rs7296262 [34], and rs3806263 [35]—and assessed the frequency of these genotypes in older adults diagnosed with dementia compared with their healthy peers. We selected polymorphisms that showed significant associations with suicide according to the GWAS as well as some other selected studies and that had a minor allele frequency in the European population of at least 10%. We evaluated the association between these polymorphisms and the index of cognitive impairment as well. In addition, we identified APOE polymorphisms in the study participants because their association with dementia risk is well known.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Patients with dementia were recruited in the gerontological department of Mental Health Clinic No. 1, named after N.A. Alekseev. Healthy volunteers were recruited in the period of 2020-2021 among volunteers who came for periodic medical examinations at Polyclinic No. 121 (Moscow). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The procedures involving experiments on human subjects were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of Protocol No. 5, dated 20 September 2020, of the Ethics Committee of the Research Clinical Institute named after L.I. Sverzhevsky Moscow Healthcare Department. A total of 112 patients with dementia and 146 healthy volunteers took part in the study.
Inclusion criteria: all diagnoses were made at a daily consensus conference of neurologists, neuropsychologists, and psychiatrists. Diagnosis status was determined according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). All participants in the dementia and control groups underwent standardized neurological examination and neuropsychological testing. All subjects were assessed for subjective complaints of memory, normal general cognition, measurable impairment of one or more cognitive functions, and functional capacity, and daily performance was considered as well. The dementia group included subjects over 65 years of age with a diagnosis of dementia (F00—dementia with Alzheimer’s disease, F01—vascular dementia, F03—dementia unspecified). The control group included subjects over 65 years of age without cognitive impairment. Exclusion criteria for control and dementia groups: mental illness; positive family history—first-line relatives with mental illness; substance abuse, and severe comorbid somatic or neurological disorders.

2.2. Cognitive Status Assessment

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive functions. The MMSE is a short 30-item questionnaire widely applied for the assessment and screening of cognitive impairments, including dementia. It is also used to evaluate the dynamics of cognitive functions against the background of ongoing therapy [36]. Subjects who scored 28–30 on the MMSE scale were considered healthy. Patients with dementia had a score of 24 or lower.

2.3. DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood collected in EDTA-containing tubes using the DNA extraction kit (Syntol, LLC, Moscow, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The alleles of the APOE gene (ε2, ε3, ε4) were determined by real-time PCR based on genotyping for the rs429358 and rs7412 markers, as described previously [37], on the LightCycler® 96 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Other markers were genotyped using the commercial TaqMan® assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions on the QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fischer). The genes and polymorphisms chosen for analysis are described in Table 1.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance was used to assess sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Data were expressed as means ± SD. Compliance with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was checked using the chi-square test. Statistical analysis was performed using the jamovi program (version 2.3.13.0). Associations between genetic markers and cognitive decline were analyzed using the SNPStats service (www.snpstats.net (accessed on 20 November 2022)) [42]. The dependent variables were the presence or absence of diagnosed dementia or MMSE scores. We used data from codominant, dominant, and recessive models. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. The p-values for the most significant models were corrected for multiple comparisons using the FDR procedure with the a priori threshold for statistical significance set to FDR < 0.05.

3. Results

Table 2 presents the characteristics of the samples studied, including healthy volunteers and patients with dementia. Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference between the groups in MMSE score (p < 0.001) and age (p < 0.001). Patients with dementia had lower MMSE scores and a higher age compared with healthy volunteers. The groups did not differ in education or the number of children.
In the study, 258 samples were genotyped for 16 genetic markers. The distribution of the genotypes is shown in Table 3.
Because of the difference in age between the groups, age was used as a covariate in the analysis using the SNPStats service. Significant associations were shown for several SNPs, but only rs429358 was corrected for multiple comparisons (Table 4).
The ε4 allele of the APOE gene was significantly associated with dementia in both heterozygous (OR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.16–4.31, p = 0.001, FDR = 0.02) and homozygous (OR = 12.57, 95% CI = 1.41–112.41, p = 0.005, FDR = 0.08) carriage. In addition, significant results were shown for rs7412 and rs4918918, which, however, did not pass the multiple comparison test. The ε2 allele of the APOE gene was more common in the control group—significant associations were shown for heterozygotes in the codominant model (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12−0.81, p = 0.02, FDR = 0.16) and for homozygotes and heterozygotes compared with non-carriers (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.14–0.91, p = 0.02, FDR = 0.19). For the rs4918918 polymorphism in the SORBS1 gene, significant associations were shown for homozygotes and heterozygotes compared with non-carriers in the dominant model (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.26–0.95, p = 0.03, FDR = 0.18). The results of the genotype frequency analysis for all polymorphisms are shown in the supplementary files (Table S1).
Analysis of the association between genotypes and the MMSE score showed several significant results, which nevertheless did not pass the multiple comparison test. The APOE ε4 allele was associated with a lower MMSE score in homozygotes and heterozygotes compared with non-carriers in the dominant model (OR = −2.65, 95% CI = (−4.66)–(−0.63), p = 0.01, FDR = 0.09). By contrast, the ε2 allele was associated with a higher MMSE score in heterozygotes compared with non-carriers in the codominant model (OR = 3.33, 95% CI = 0.60–6.07, p = 0.01, FDR = 0.07). For the rs10903034 polymorphism in the IFNLR1 gene, the homozygotes and heterozygotes were shown to be associated with a lower MMSE score compared with non-carriers in the dominant model (OR = −2.96, 95% CI = (−5.08)–(−0.84), p = 0.007, FDR = 0.11). The results of the analysis of the association between genotypes and MMSE scores for all polymorphisms are shown in the supplementary files (Table S2).

4. Discussion

To date, there have been many genetic studies of dementia, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies, which contain much useful information on the association between dementia and various genetic variants [43,44]. However, there are currently no NGS studies on suicidal behavior, so it is of great interest to study this aspect, including in patients with dementia. Assessment of the relationship of SNPs, which are associated with the risk of suicide, with cognitive decline in older adults showed potential significance for rs4918918 in the SORBS1 gene and rs10903034 in the IFNLR1/IL10RB gene. It should be noted that the results for these polymorphisms were not tested for multiple comparisons. However, we believe that attention should be paid to them because our study was performed on a small sample, while a larger-scale test could conceivably confirm the results.
The SORBS1 gene is located on chromosome 10 and encodes a CBL-associated protein that is involved in insulin signaling (CAP/Ponsin protein, also known as Sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 1). SORBS1 is an important protein in the signaling pathway that mediates glucose uptake by the cell, which is stimulated by insulin. Genetic polymorphisms in this gene may regulate insulin resistance [45,46]. Insulin receptors are ubiquitous in the central nervous system. Insulin performs important functions in the brain, where it is involved in biological pathways relevant to neuronal survival, dendritic outgrowth, synaptic plasticity, and cognition, especially learning and memory [47]. Central insulin resistance is associated with various cognitive impairments and psychopathologies across the lifespan [47,48]. The expression product of the SORBS1 gene is expressed in many tissues, most commonly adipose tissue, the heart, and other tissues, including the brain. Variations in the SORBS1 gene are associated with glucose homeostasis, age of onset of diabetes, blood pressure, and high-density lipoprotein blood levels [45,49,50]. However, there are currently no studies demonstrating how the rs4918918 polymorphism affects the expression of the SORBS1 gene and through what mechanisms this polymorphism may affect brain function and behavior. Several studies support the potential role of the SORBS1 gene in cognitive impairment. It was suggested that a genetic polymorphism in SORBS1 is associated with cerebral infarction, which was shown in a Japanese population [48]. An epigenomic association study between cognitive ability and DNA methylation patterns in blood samples from monozygotic twins showed that the most associated finding of cognitive change was SORBS1 [51]. In a meta-analysis using a large sample of 8737 patients, including 2805 patients with suicide attempts, rs4918918 was shown to be associated with suicide attempts in patients with affective disorders [31]. Our study showed that the rs4918918 polymorphism in the SORBS1 gene differed in frequency between dementia and cognitively healthy individuals; the C allele presumably could be a risk factor for dementia. This further confirms earlier studies on the association between the SORBS1 gene and cognitive dysfunction.
Another rs10903034 polymorphism in our study was associated with scores on the MMSE scale (allele C was a risk factor). This polymorphism is located in the IFNLR1 (Interferon Lambda Receptor 1) gene, which is localized in chromosome 1 and encodes the receptor for cytokine ligands, mediating their antiviral activity. The IFNLR1 gene is expressed in many organs and tissues, including the cortex and cerebellum. Currently, there are few data on the functioning of this gene in brain tissues. However, it is known from animal experiments that there is an increase in the permeability of the blood–brain barrier in knockout mice by this gene, which indicates a potential role of this gene in brain function, although the exact mechanisms of the function are not understood [52]. Previous studies have not found a significant association between this gene and neurodegenerative diseases or psychiatric disorders, but a mutation at position rs10903034 of this gene was associated with treatment-emergent suicidal ideation [32,53]. According to one theory, neuroinflammation can cause both neurodegeneration and mental dysfunction [54,55], and many immune dementia risk genes have already been identified [56]. The rs10903034 polymorphism may be one of these genes, as our study showed a possible association between this genetic variant and cognitive dysfunction.
Our study showed a significant association between the rs429358 polymorphism of the APOE gene and the diagnosis of dementia, which passed multiple comparison testing, with the C minor allele being a risk factor. The other rs7412 polymorphism of the APOE gene showed significant associations (the C allele is a risk factor) without adjusting for multiple comparisons. In addition, both polymorphisms of the APOE gene showed an association with MMSE scores, which also did not pass the multiple comparison adjustment. The APOE gene encodes a multifunctional protein that plays a key role in lipoprotein metabolism both in the brain and in the periphery. In the periphery, ApoE is mainly synthesized by the liver and transports lipoproteins by binding to specific receptors. In the brain, ApoE is produced mainly by astrocytes and microglia and plays a key role in brain cholesterol metabolism and β-amyloid excretion [40,41,57]. The APOE gene is located on chromosome 19 in humans and is polymorphic, which means that it is characterized by a combination of polymorphisms 388T > C (rs429358) and 526C > T (rs7412). These polymorphisms form three major haplotypes (ɛ2 (388T-526T), ɛ3 (388T-526C), ɛ4 (388C-526C)) and six genotypes (ɛ2/ɛ2, ɛ2/ɛ3, ɛ2/ɛ4, ɛ3/ɛ3, ɛ3/ɛ4, ɛ4/ɛ4) [40,58]. Lipids and plasma lipoproteins are strongly genetically influenced by the APOE polymorphism. Carriers of the ε4 allele of the APOE gene (APOE ε4) have higher levels of total cholesterol than non-carriers. Therefore, APOE ε4 is a strong genetic risk factor for cardiovascular disease [41]. In addition, APOE ε4 is a major genetic risk factor for AD [39], which is further supported by a study that found differences between APOE ε4 and APOE ε3 in binding to β-amyloid [59]. In addition, the APOE polymorphism was shown to be associated with cognitive dysfunction in healthy individuals [38]. Our study confirmed the relationship of APOE gene variants with cognitive impairment in elderly people in our sample, as the risk alleles were more frequently found in the dementia group and were also associated with a lower score on the MMSE cognitive scale.
Our study has certain limitations. Suicide studies usually include subjects who have had suicide attempts or suicidal ideas. However, our study did not include this cohort of patients, which is a disadvantage because without this cohort, the associations identified have the risk of being false positives. For this reason, we need to be cautious about our results and further study the identified genetic variants in the cohort of patients with a suicidal history.

5. Conclusions

The results of our study confirmed the association of rs429358 and rs7412 polymorphisms of the APOE gene with cognitive impairment in older adults—it was shown that the risk alleles of these genetic variants are more common in older adults with dementia than in healthy individuals, and they are also associated with lower cognitive status scores. In addition, two genetic variants previously associated with suicide were identified for which a relationship with cognitive impairment in older adults was shown: rs4918918 and rs10903034.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13112174/s1, Table S1: Analysis of the association between allele frequency and the study groups (dementia compared to controls); Table S2: Analysis of the association between genotypes and the MMSE score.

Author Contributions

Patient samples collection: Y.Z., A.O., N.A., K.P., O.P. and V.U.; Clinical data collection: K.S., O.K., V.S. and M.K.; Statistical analysis: T.S., A.I. and O.A.; Methodology—genotyping: D.G., A.I., E.F., M.E. and K.P.; Writing—original draft preparation: O.A., A.I., Y.Z., K.S.; Writing—review and editing: A.A., D.A., O.G. and A.M.; Clinical data administration: V.S. and M.K.; Supervision: A.A., A.M. and V.C.; Project administration: A.M. and G.K.; Funding acquisition: D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Moscow Centre for Innovative Technologies in Healthcare, Grant No. 2708-1/22.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Research Clinical Institute named after L.I. Sverzhevsky Moscow Healthcare Department (Protocol No. 5, dated 20 September 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Balázs, N.; Ajtay, A.; Oberfrank, F.; Bereczki, D.; Kovács, T. Dementia epidemiology in Hungary based on data from neurological and psychiatric specialty services. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wurm, R.; Stögmann, E. Epidemiology of dementia-the epidemic we saw coming. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. (1946) 2021, 171, 247–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Garre-Olmo, J. Epidemiologia de la enfermedad de Alzheimer y otras demencias [Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias]. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 66, 377–386. [Google Scholar]
  4. Galvin, J.E.; Sadowsky, C.H. NINCDS-ADRDA Practical guidelines for the recognition and diagnosis of dementia. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. JABFM 2012, 25, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Gale, S.A.; Acar, D.; Daffner, K.R. Dementia. Am. J. Med. 2018, 131, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ball, H.A.; McWhirter, L.; Ballard, C.; Bhome, R.; Blackburn, D.J.; Edwards, M.J.; Fleming, S.M.; Fox, N.C.; Howard, R.; Huntley, J.; et al. Functional cognitive disorder: Dementia’s blind spot. Brain 2020, 143, 2895–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Canevelli, M.; Lucchini, F.; Quarata, F.; Bruno, G.; Cesari, M. Nutrition and Dementia: Evidence for Preventive Approaches? Nutrients 2016, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Guzman-Martinez, L.; Maccioni, R.B.; Farías, G.A.; Fuentes, P.; Navarrete, L.P. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2019, 16, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Molinuevo, J.L.; Ayton, S.; Batrla, R.; Bednar, M.M.; Bittner, T.; Cummings, J.; Fagan, A.M.; Hampel, H.; Mielke, M.M.; Mikulskis, A.; et al. Current state of Alzheimer’s fluid biomarkers. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 136, 821–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kunkle, B.W.; Grenier-Boley, B.; Sims, R.; Bis, J.C.; Damotte, V.; Naj, A.C.; Boland, A.; Vronskaya, M.; van der Lee, S.J.; Amlie-Wolf, A.; et al. Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, Polygenic and Environmental Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium (GERAD/PERADES). Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 414–430. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ridge, P.G.; Hoyt, K.B.; Boehme, K.; Mukherjee, S.; Crane, P.K.; Haines, J.L.; Mayeux, R.; Farrer, L.A.; Pericak-Vance, M.A.; Schellenberg, G.D.; et al. Assessment of the genetic variance of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2016, 41, 200.e13–200.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Andrews, S.J.; McFall, G.P.; Booth, A.; Dixon, R.A.; Anstey, K.J. Association of Alzheimer’s Disease Genetic Risk Loci with Cognitive Performance and Decline: A Systematic Review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019, 69, 1109–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Karch, C.M.; Cruchaga, C.; Goate, A.M. Alzheimer’s disease genetics: From the bench to the clinic. Neuron 2014, 83, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Karch, C.M.; Goate, A.M. Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 77, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Davies, G.; Lam, M.; Harris, S.E.; Trampush, J.W.; Luciano, M.; Hill, W.D.; Hagenaars, S.P.; Ritchie, S.J.; Marioni, R.E.; Fawns-Ritchie, C.; et al. Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Savage, J.E.; Jansen, P.R.; Stringer, S.; Watanabe, K.; Bryois, J.; de Leeuw, C.A.; Posthuma, D. Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 912–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. An, J.H.; Lee, K.E.; Jeon, H.J.; Son, S.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Hong, J.P. Risk of suicide and accidental deaths among elderly patients with cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2019, 11, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kułak-Bejda, A.; Bejda, G.; Waszkiewicz, N. Mental Disorders, Cognitive Impairment and the Risk of Suicide in Older Adults. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 695286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Szanto, K. Cognitive Deficits: Underappreciated Contributors to Suicide. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Off. J. Am. Assoc. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2017, 25, 630–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alothman, D.; Card, T.; Lewis, S.; Tyrrell, E.; Fogarty, A.W.; Marshall, C.R. Risk of Suicide After Dementia Diagnosis. JAMA Neurol. 2022, 79, 1148–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. DiBlasi, E.; Kang, J.; Docherty, A.R. Genetic contributions to suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Psychol. Med. 2021, 51, 2148–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brent, D.A.; Melhem, N.M.; Oquendo, M.; Burke, A.; Birmaher, B.; Stanley, B.; Biernesser, C.; Keilp, J.; Kolko, D.; Ellis, S.; et al. Familial pathways to early-onset suicide attempt: A 5.6-year prospective study. JAMA Psychiatry 2015, 72, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Voracek, M.; Loibl, L.M. Genetics of suicide: A systematic review of twin studies. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2007, 119, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pedersen, N.L.; Fiske, A. Genetic influences on suicide and nonfatal suicidal behavior: Twin study findings. Eur. Psychiatry J. Assoc. Eur. Psychiatr. 2010, 25, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ruderfer, D.M.; Walsh, C.G.; Aguirre, M.W.; Tanigawa, Y.; Ribeiro, J.D.; Franklin, J.C.; Rivas, M.A. Significant shared heritability underlies suicide attempt and clinically predicted probability of attempting suicide. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 25, 2422–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Erlangsen, A.; Appadurai, V.; Wang, Y.; Turecki, G.; Mors, O.; Werge, T.; Mortensen, P.B.; Starnawska, A.; Børglum, A.D.; Schork, A.; et al. Genetics of suicide attempts in individuals with and without mental disorders: A population-based genome-wide association study. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 25, 2410–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Richard-Devantoy, S.; Turecki, G.; Jollant, F. Neurobiology of Elderly Suicide. Arch. Suicide Res. Off. J. Int. Acad. Suicide Res. 2016, 20, 291–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mullins, N.; Bigdeli, T.B.; Børglum, A.D.; Coleman, J.; Demontis, D.; Mehta, D.; Power, R.A.; Ripke, S.; Stahl, E.A.; Starnawska, A.; et al. GWAS of Suicide Attempt in Psychiatric Disorders and Association with Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores. Am. J. Psychiatry 2019, 176, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kimbrel, N.A.; Garrett, M.E.; Dennis, M.F.; VA Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center Workgroup; Hauser, M.A.; Ashley-Koch, A.E.; Beckham, J.C. A genome-wide association study of suicide attempts and suicidal ideation in U.S. military veterans. Psychiatry Res. 2018, 269, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perroud, N.; Uher, R.; Ng, M.Y.; Guipponi, M.; Hauser, J.; Henigsberg, N.; Maier, W.; Mors, O.; Gennarelli, M.; Rietschel, M.; et al. Genome-wide association study of increasing suicidal ideation during antidepressant treatment in the GENDEP project. Pharm. J. 2012, 12, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Perlis, R.H.; Huang, J.; Purcell, S.; Fava, M.; Rush, A.J.; Sullivan, P.F.; Hamilton, S.P.; McMahon, F.J.; Schulze, T.G.; Potash, J.B.; et al. Genome-wide association study of suicide attempts in mood disorder patients. Am. J. Psychiatry 2010, 167, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Laje, G.; Allen, A.S.; Akula, N.; Manji, H.; John Rush, A.; McMahon, F.J. Genome-wide association study of suicidal ideation emerging during citalopram treatment of depressed outpatients. Pharm. Genom. 2009, 19, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lian, G.; Yan, Y.; Jianxiong, L.; Juanjuan, X.; Qing, C.; Guangliang, W.; Li, S. The rs11833579 and rs12425791 polymorphisms and risk of ischemic stroke in an Asian population: A meta-analysis. Thromb. Res. 2012, 130, e95–e102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Willour, V.L.; Seifuddin, F.; Mahon, P.B.; Jancic, D.; Pirooznia, M.; Steele, J.; Schweizer, B.; Goes, F.S.; Mondimore, F.M.; Mackinnon, D.F.; et al. A genome-wide association study of attempted suicide. Mol. Psychiatry 2012, 17, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Safa, A.; Omrani, M.D.; Nicknafs, F.; Oskooei, V.K.; Taheri, M.; Ghafouri-Fard, S. Assessment of Association between NINJ2 Polymorphisms and Suicide Attempts in an Iranian Population. J. Mol. Neurosci. MN 2020, 70, 1880–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Creavin, S.T.; Wisniewski, S.; Noel-Storr, A.H.; Trevelyan, C.M.; Hampton, T.; Rayment, D.; Thom, V.M.; Nash, K.J.; Elhamoui, H.; Milligan, R.; et al. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of dementia in clinically unevaluated people aged 65 and over in community and primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 2016, CD011145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Yi, L.; Wu, T.; Luo, W.; Zhou, W.; Wu, J. A non-invasive, rapid method to genotype late-onset Alzheimer’s disease-related apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms. Neural Regen. Res. 2014, 9, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chu, C.S.; Lu, T.; Tsai, S.J.; Hong, C.J.; Yeh, H.L.; Yang, A.C.; Liu, M.E. APOE ɛ4 polymorphism and cognitive deficit among the very old Chinese veteran men without dementia. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 576, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Corder, E.H.; Saunders, A.M.; Strittmatter, W.J.; Schmechel, D.E.; Gaskell, P.C.; Small, G.W.; Roses, A.D.; Haines, J.L.; Pericak-Vance, M.A. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 1993, 261, 921–923. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu, H.; Huang, Q.; Yu, Z.; Wu, H.; Zhong, Z. The SNPs rs429358 and rs7412 of APOE gene are association with cerebral infarction but not SNPs rs2306283 and rs4149056 of SLCO1B1 gene in southern Chinese Hakka population. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhen, J.; Huang, X.; Van Halm-Lutterodt, N.; Dong, S.; Ma, W.; Xiao, R.; Yuan, L. ApoE rs429358 and rs7412 Polymorphism and Gender Differences of Serum Lipid Profile and Cognition in Aging Chinese Population. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Solé, X.; Guinó, E.; Valls, J.; Iniesta, R.; Moreno, V. SNPStats: A web tool for the analysis of association studies. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1928–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bonvicini, C.; Scassellati, C.; Benussi, L.; Di Maria, E.; Maj, C.; Ciani, M.; Fostinelli, S.; Mega, A.; Bocchetta, M.; Lanzi, G.; et al. Next Generation Sequencing Analysis in Early Onset Dementia Patients. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019, 67, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bertram, L. Next Generation Sequencing in Alzheimer’s Disease. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1303, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Chang, T.J.; Wang, W.C.; Hsiung, C.A.; He, C.T.; Lin, M.W.; Sheu, W.H.; Chang, Y.C.; Quertermous, T.; Chen, Y.I.; Rotter, J.I.; et al. Genetic variation of SORBS1 gene is associated with glucose homeostasis and age at onset of diabetes: A SAPPHIRe Cohort Study. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hagiwara, N.; Kitazono, T.; Kamouchi, M.; Kuroda, J.; Ago, T.; Hata, J.; Ninomiya, T.; Ooboshi, H.; Kumai, Y.; Yoshimura, S.; et al. Hisayama study Polymorphism in the sorbin and SH3-domain-containing-1 (SORBS1) gene and the risk of brain infarction in the Japanese population: The Fukuoka Stroke Registry and the Hisayama study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2008, 15, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Frangou, S.; Shirali, M.; Adams, M.J.; Howard, D.M.; Gibson, J.; Hall, L.S.; Smith, B.H.; Padmanabhan, S.; Murray, A.D.; Porteous, D.J.; et al. Insulin resistance: Genetic associations with depression and cognition in population based cohorts. Exp. Neurol. 2019, 316, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Singh, M.K.; Leslie, S.M.; Packer, M.M.; Zaiko, Y.V.; Phillips, O.R.; Weisman, E.F.; Wall, D.M.; Jo, B.; Rasgon, N. Brain and behavioral correlates of insulin resistance in youth with depression and obesity. Horm. Behav. 2019, 108, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gong, S.; Huo, S.; Luo, Y.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Huang, X.; Hu, M.; Liu, W.; Zhang, R.; Cai, X.; et al. A variation in SORBS1 is associated with type 2 diabetes and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in Chinese population. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2022, 38, e3524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chang, T.J.; Wang, W.C.; Hsiung, C.A.; He, C.T.; Lin, M.W.; Sheu, W.H.; Chang, Y.C.; Quertermous, T.; Chen, I.; Rotter, J.; et al. Genetic Variation in the Human SORBS1 Gene is Associated with Blood Pressure Regulation and Age at Onset of Hypertension: A SAPPHIRe Cohort Study. Medicine 2016, 95, e2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Starnawska, A.; Tan, Q.; McGue, M.; Mors, O.; Børglum, A.D.; Christensen, K.; Nyegaard, M.; Christiansen, L. Epigenome-Wide Association Study of Cognitive Functioning in Middle-Aged Monozygotic Twins. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lazear, H.M.; Daniels, B.P.; Pinto, A.K.; Huang, A.C.; Vick, S.C.; Doyle, S.E.; Gale, M., Jr.; Klein, R.S.; Diamond, M.S. Interferon-λ restricts West Nile virus neuroinvasion by tightening the blood-brain barrier. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 284ra59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Menke, A.; Domschke, K.; Czamara, D.; Klengel, T.; Hennings, J.; Lucae, S.; Baune, B.T.; Arolt, V.; Müller-Myhsok, B.; Holsboer, F.; et al. Genome-wide association study of antidepressant treatment-emergent suicidal ideation. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 37, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Heneka, M.T.; Carson, M.J.; El Khoury, J.; Landreth, G.E.; Brosseron, F.; Feinstein, D.L.; Jacobs, A.H.; Wyss-Coray, T.; Vitorica, J.; Ransohoff, R.M.; et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Calcia, M.A.; Bonsall, D.R.; Bloomfield, P.S.; Selvaraj, S.; Barichello, T.; Howes, O.D. Stress and neuroinflammation: A systematic review of the effects of stress on microglia and the implications for mental illness. Psychopharmacology 2016, 233, 1637–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Griciuc, A.; Tanzi, R.E. The role of innate immune genes in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2021, 34, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rasmussen, K.L. Plasma levels of apolipoprotein E, APOE genotype and risk of dementia and ischemic heart disease: A review. Atherosclerosis 2016, 255, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Seripa, D.; D’Onofrio, G.; Panza, F.; Cascavilla, L.; Masullo, C.; Pilotto, A. The genetics of the human APOE polymorphism. Rejuvenation Res. 2011, 14, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tokuda, T.; Calero, M.; Matsubara, E.; Vidal, R.; Kumar, A.; Permanne, B.; Zlokovic, B.; Smith, J.D.; Ladu, M.J.; Rostagno, A.; et al. Lipidation of apolipoprotein E influences its isoform-specific interaction with Alzheimer’s amyloid beta peptides. Biochem. J. 2000, 348 Pt 2, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Polymorphism descriptions.
Table 1. Polymorphism descriptions.
SNPAllelesGeneAssay *Gene ProductAssociations with Mental Disorders and Suicidal BehaviorReferences
rs429358T > CAPOEC_3084793_20Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) A risk factor for AD and cognitive dysfunction in healthy individuals[38,39,40,41]
rs7412C > TAPOEC_904973_10
rs9475195T > CHCRTR2C_30334164_10Orexin receptor type 2 (Ox2R)Suicide attempts in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia[28]
rs7982251C > TFLT1C_29426110_10Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1Suicide attempts in bipolar disorder [28]
rs2834789T > CRUNX1C_16074160_10α-Subunit of nuclear binding factorSuicide attempts [29]
rs358592C > TKCNIP4C_8939728_10Proteins that interact with potential-dependent potassium channels.Suicidal ideation[30]
rs4918918T > CSORBS1C_3178855_10CBL-associated protein that is involved in insulin signalingSuicide attempts in affective disorders[31]
rs3781878G > ANCAM1C_2998862_10Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule 1Suicide attempts in bipolar disorder and depression[28]
rs10903034C > TIFNLR1C_2979476_10Receptor for cytokine ligands IFNL2 and IFNL3Suicidal thoughts in depressed patients[32]
rs165774G > ACOMTC_2255325_10Catechol-O-methyl transferase. Cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the attachment of a methyl group to various catecholamines Suicide attempts in bipolar disorder[28]
rs16841143G > APTH2RC_2098753_10Parathyroid hormone receptor type 2Suicide attempts [26]
rs11833579G > ANINJ2C_1665834_10Protein belonging to the ninjurin family, inducer of myelinationIschemic stroke[33]
rs10898553T > CPRSS23C_1439661_10Serine protease 23Suicide attempts and suicidal thoughts among U.S. armed forces veterans[29]
rs7296262T > CTMEM132CC_1179719_10Transmembrane protein 132CSuicide attempts[34]
rs3806263G > ACOQ8A (ADCK3)C_281882_10Coenzyme Q8A is an atypical kinase involved in the biosynthesis of coenzyme QSuicide attempts in the Iranian Population[35]
rs2462021C > TJCADC_202076_10Protein functionally bound to cadherin 5Suicide attempts in affective disorders[31]
* TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assays.
Table
Table 2. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of healthy volunteers and dementia patients.
Table 2. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of healthy volunteers and dementia patients.
ControlDementiap-Value
Number of participants146 (56.6%)112 (43.4%)
Age, years68.1 ± 6.376.7 ± 9.0<0.001
Number of children1.7 ± 0.61.4 ± 0.50.15
Education duration
School education, years9.8 ± 0.79.7 ± 0.70.74
Secondary education (including special education), years11.2 ± 1.511.0 ± 1.60.57
Higher education, years5.2 ± 1.64.7 ± 0.50.07
Assessment of cognitive functions
Total MMSE score28.9 ± 0.614.27 ± 6.7<0.001
Data were expressed as Mean ± SD. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Table
Table 3. Distribution of alleles and test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Table 3. Distribution of alleles and test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
SNPControlDementiaTest for Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (p-Value) *
APOE rs429358 (T > C)
T/T107 (75.9%)65 (59.1%)0.52
T/C33 (23.4%)37 (33.6%)
C/C1 (0.7%)8 (7.3%)
APOE rs7412 (C > T)
C/C121 (84%)101 (91.8%)1.00
C/T23 (16%)8 (7.3%)
T/T0 (0%)1 (0.9%)
HCRTR2 rs9475195 (T > C)
T/T40 (41.2%)30 (30.9%)0.30
C/T42 (43.3%)45 (46.4%)
C/C15 (15.5%)22 (22.7%)
FLT1 rs7982251 (C > T)
T/T94 (78.3%)82 (76.6%)0.75
C/T24 (20%)23 (21.5%)
C/C2 (1.7%)2 (1.9%)
RUNX1 rs2834789 (T > C)
T/T49 (46.2%)41 (39.4%)0.45
C/T46 (43.4%)45 (43.3%)
C/C11 (10.4%)18 (17.3%)
KCNIP4 rs358592 (C > T)
T/T47 (43.5%)48 (50%)0.51
C/T52 (48.1%)40 (41.7%)
C/C9 (8.3%)8 (8.3%)
SORBS1 rs4918918 (T > C)
C/C42 (40.4%)57 (55.9%)0.08
C/T44 (42.3%)35 (34.3%)
T/T18 (17.3%)10 (9.8%)
NCAM1 rs3781878 (G > A)
G/G54 (60%)51 (51.5%)1.00
A/G32 (35.6%)40 (40.4%)
A/A4 (4.4%)8 (8.1%)
IFNLR1 rs10903034 (C > T)
T/T46 (43%)33 (31.7%)0.47
C/T44 (41.1%)52 (50%)
C/C17 (15.9%)19 (18.3%)
COMT rs165774 (G > A)
G/G57 (54.8%)48 (48.5%)0.86
A/G41 (39.4%)42 (42.4%)
A/A6 (5.8%)9 (9.1%)
PTH2R rs16841143 (G > A)
G/G80 (79.2%)86 (83.5%)0.24
A/G18 (17.8%)16 (15.5%)
A/A3 (3%)1 (1%)
NINJ2 rs11833579 (G > A)
G/G52 (50%)62 (60.2%)0.58
A/G45 (43.3%)37 (35.9%)
A/A7 (6.7%)4 (3.9%)
PRSS23 rs10898553 (T > C)
C/C23 (30.3%)22 (23.9%)0.88
C/T39 (51.3%)47 (51.1%)
T/T14 (18.4%)23 (25%)
TMEM132C rs7296262 (T > C)
T/T33 (33.3%)34 (32.1%)0.89
C/T49 (49.5%)50 (47.2%)
C/C17 (17.2%)22 (20.8%)
COQ8A (ADCK3) rs3806263 (G > A)
G/G51 (52%)54 (52.9%)0.86
A/G40 (40.8%)39 (38.2%)
A/A7 (7.1%)9 (8.8%)
JCAD rs2462021 (C > T)
T/T63 (61.2%)50 (51%)0.71
C/T35 (34%)39 (39.8%)
C/C5 (4.8%)9 (9.2%)
* The test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was performed for the total cohort.
Table
Table 4. Analysis of allele frequency association with study groups and association between genotypes and the MMSE score. Age was used as a covariate.
Table 4. Analysis of allele frequency association with study groups and association between genotypes and the MMSE score. Age was used as a covariate.
GenesSNPAssociation of Allele Frequency with Study GroupsAssociation of Genotypes with the MMSE Score
The Most Significant Modelp-ValueFDRThe Most Significant Modelp-ValueFDR
APOErs429358Codominant0.0010.02Dominant0.010.09
APOErs7412Codominant0.020.16Codominant0.010.07
HCRTR2rs9475195Recessive0.210.42Recessive0.080.34
FLT1rs7982251Dominant0.290.39Recessive0.720.77
RUNX1rs2834789Recessive0.210.37Recessive0.770.77
KCNIP4rs358592Dominant0.250.40Recessive0.320.51
SORBS1rs4918918Dominant0.030.18Dominant0.480.59
NCAM1rs3781878Dominant0.080.30Dominant0.090.28
IFNLR1rs10903034Dominant0.190.43Dominant0.0070.11
COMTrs165774Recessive0.110.35Recessive0.560.64
PTH2Rrs16841143Dominant0.530.65Recessive0.470.63
NINJ2rs11833579Dominant0.160.43Recessive0.240.55
PRSS23rs10898553Recessive0.280.41Dominant0.240.48
TMEM132Crs7296262Dominant0.620.66Dominant0.360.52
COQ8A (ADCK3)rs3806263Dominant0.750.75Recessive0.260.46
JCADrs2462021Recessive0.580.66Recessive0.120.32
FDR: false discovery rate; p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abramova, O.; Soloveva, K.; Zorkina, Y.; Gryadunov, D.; Ikonnikova, A.; Fedoseeva, E.; Emelyanova, M.; Ochneva, A.; Andriushchenko, N.; Pavlov, K.; et al. Suicide-Related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, rs4918918 and rs10903034: Association with Dementia in Older Adults. Genes 2022, 13, 2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112174

AMA Style

Abramova O, Soloveva K, Zorkina Y, Gryadunov D, Ikonnikova A, Fedoseeva E, Emelyanova M, Ochneva A, Andriushchenko N, Pavlov K, et al. Suicide-Related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, rs4918918 and rs10903034: Association with Dementia in Older Adults. Genes. 2022; 13(11):2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abramova, Olga, Kristina Soloveva, Yana Zorkina, Dmitry Gryadunov, Anna Ikonnikova, Elena Fedoseeva, Marina Emelyanova, Aleksandra Ochneva, Nika Andriushchenko, Konstantin Pavlov, and et al. 2022. "Suicide-Related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, rs4918918 and rs10903034: Association with Dementia in Older Adults" Genes 13, no. 11: 2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112174

APA Style

Abramova, O., Soloveva, K., Zorkina, Y., Gryadunov, D., Ikonnikova, A., Fedoseeva, E., Emelyanova, M., Ochneva, A., Andriushchenko, N., Pavlov, K., Pavlova, O., Ushakova, V., Syunyakov, T., Andryushchenko, A., Karpenko, O., Savilov, V., Kurmishev, M., Andreuyk, D., Gurina, O., ... Morozova, A. (2022). Suicide-Related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, rs4918918 and rs10903034: Association with Dementia in Older Adults. Genes, 13(11), 2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112174

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop