Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Reference Genes for Transcriptional Profiling in Two Cockroach Models
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Prediction for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Hanwoo Cattle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/genes12121887
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Serpin Family E Member 1 Tag Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: An Association Study and Meta-Analysis Using a Genetic Model-Free Approach

by
Maria Tziastoudi
1,*,
Efthimios Dardiotis
2,
Georgios Pissas
1,
Georgios Filippidis
1,
Spyridon Golfinopoulos
1,
Vasileios Siokas
2,
Sophia V. Tachmitzi
3,
Theodoros Eleftheriadis
1,
Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou
2,4,
Evangelia Tsironi
3 and
Ioannis Stefanidis
1
1
Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
2
Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
4
Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 22006, Cyprus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(12), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12121887
Submission received: 15 October 2021 / Revised: 18 November 2021 / Accepted: 23 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Many lines of evidence highlight the genetic contribution on the development of diabetic nephropathy (DN). One of the studied genes is SERPINE1 whose the role in the risk of developing DN remains questionable. In order to elucidate the contribution of SERPINE1 in DN progression in the context of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we conducted an association study and meta-analysis of SERPINE1 genetic variants. Materials and Methods: A total of 190 patients with DN, 150 T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus) patients without DN and 238 healthy controls were recruited. We selected five tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the HapMap. The generalized odds ratio (ORG) was calculated to estimate the risk on DN development. Subgroup analyses based on ethnicity and type of diabetes were also performed. Results: Both the present association study regarding SERPINE1 SNPs (rs2227667, rs2070682, rs1050813, rs2227690, rs2227692) did not found any significant association between SERPINE1 variants and DN and the meta-analysis of variant 4G>5G (rs1799889) did not also reveal a significant association between 4G>5G variant and DN in main and subgroup analyses. Discussion: In conclusion, the present association study and meta-analysis provides strong evidence that SERPINE1 genetic variant 4G>5G is not implicated in the risk or development of DN in Caucasians. Further studies in other populations remain to further investigate the role of this variant in the course of DN.

1. Background

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) constitutes one of the microvascular complications of both type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the most common form of chronic kidney disease [1]. Despite the glycemic and hemodynamic alterations, the genetic contribution in DN is unquestionable but still obscure [2,3]. Many genetic loci have been implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease but each genetic loci is characterized of small effect size [4,5].
Two main approaches were used for the genetic dissection of the DN, genetic linkage studies and genetic association studies [6,7]. There is a plethora of genetic linkage studies [8,9,10,11,12,13] and genetic association studies that examines one or more loci or even refers to genome-wide scale [14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Except individual studies, there are also available meta-analyses of these studies. The most recent meta-analysis of genome-wide linkage studies (GWLS) identified significantly suggestive for linkage with DN cytogenetic locations on the following chromosomes: 1q, 3q, 4p, 5q, 7q, 15q, 16p, 17q, 19q and 22p [21]. On the other hand, the most recent meta-analysis of genetic association studies in DN revealed significance of genetic polymorphisms harbored in fifty-one loci and three intergenic regions [22]. In another meta-analysis of genetic association studies, the pathway analysis of significant genes revealed statistically significant overrepresentation of six signalling pathways: cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction, pyruvate metabolism, T2DM, adipocytokine signalling pathway, renal cell carcinoma and the renin–angiotensin system [23].
Among the numerous genetic loci studied in both individual studies [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] and meta-analyses [32,33,34] is serpin family E member 1 (SERPINE1) gene, also known as Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), which is a member of the serine proteinase inhibitor (serpin) superfamily and constitutes the principal inhibitor of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase (uPA) leading to inhibition of fibrinolysis [32]. The SERPINE1 gene is located at chromosome band 7q22.1. The protein also functions as a component of innate antiviral immunity. It is known a common polymorphism in the promoter region of the gene, known as 4G/5G (rs1799889), with the 5G allele slightly less transcriptionally active than the 4G allele. Increased PAI-1 levels are associate with diabetic complications [35,36,37].
In this study, in an effort to enlighten the contribution of SERPINE1 gene in the pathogenesis of DN in the context of T2DM, we selected five tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for genotyping in a case-control study of Caucasians. In order to confirm the findings of the study, we also performed a meta-analysis of available genetic polymorphisms located in this gene.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Association Study

2.1.1. Study Population

The details about the study design and the participants have been described elsewhere [38]. In brief, a total of 190 patients with DN, 150 T2DM patients without microvascular complications and 238 healthy controls were participated in this study. All participants were examined in the Ophthalmology and Nephrology outpatient clinics of the University Hospital of Larissa in Greece.
The criteria of diabetic nephropathy (DN) was persistent albuminuria, urinary albumin excretion>300 mg/24 h (>200 μg/min) regardless the elevated or not serum creatinine levels. The study was approved by the University of Thessaly Ethics Committee and informed consent was received from all participants.

2.1.2. Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using a salting out method. Based on the HapMap population database for Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry (CEU) (Release 27, Phase II+III, Feb09, on NCBI B36 assembly, dbSNP b126) tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across SERPINE1 (spanning a 11.86 kbp region that consists of nine exons in chr7:positions 100,557,172 to 100,569,026) were identified on the basis of linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks according to HapMap project (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov accessed on 15 May 2016) using the tagger genetic program (http://www.broadinstitute.org/mpg/tagger accessed on 15 May 2016). Selection of tagging SNPs was conducted using criteria of r2 cut-off of greater than or equal to 0.8 and minor allele frequency (MAF) of >0.05. The details of the selection of tagging SNPs have been also described elsewhere(38). A total of 5 tag SNPs in four distinct gene regions were retrieved in the intronic region between exons 3–4 (rs2227667), in the intron 5–6 (rs2070682, rs2227690), the intron 7–8 (rs2227692), and in the 3′UTR region (rs1050813). The captured tag SNPs were distributed in two specific LD blocks: rs2227667 in block 1 and rs2070682, rs2227690, rs2227692, and rs1050813 in block 2.
Genotyping of tag SNPs was performed with a TaqMan allele specific discrimination assays method on an ABI PRISM 7900 sequence detection system and was analyzed with the SDS software version 2.3 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) [38]. The laboratory personnel was blinded to the clinical status.

2.1.3. Data Analysis

The data for continuous variables were expressed as mean value and standard deviation [mean ± SD] and data for nominal variables as count (or ratio) and percentage [n (%)]. The association between genotype distribution and disease was examined using the generalized odds ratio (ORG) [39,40]. In healthy controls, deviation of the genotype distribution from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was also tested.
ORG was calculated using ORGGASMA (http://biomath.med.uth.gr accessed on 30 August 2021) [39,40]. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 26.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

2.2. Meta-Analysis

2.2.1. Identification and Eligibility of Relevant Studies

All of the studies published until December 2020 were identified by extended computer based search of PubMed database. The following search terms were used: (“Serpin family E member 1” or SERPINE1 or “Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1” or PAI-1) AND (“diabetic nephropathy” OR “diabetic kidney disease” OR “end-stage renal disease”) AND (genetic or association or gene or polymorphism). We also retrieved articles from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/ accessed on 1 December 2020). All of the references cited in the included studies were also scrutinized to identify additional published work. Meta-analyses of the included genes were also screened. Case reports, editorials, and review articles were also excluded. The search was restricted to articles in English.
Case–control studies that determined the distribution of genotypes harbored in SERPINE1 gene in cases with DN and in either diseased controls with diabetes but without DN or in healthy controls were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria of cases with DN and both diseased controls and healthy controls were the same as those of the present association study. Finally, genome linkage scans were excluded because they regard other study design.

2.2.2. Data Extraction

From each article we extracted the following information: first author, year of publication, ethnicity, PubMed unique identifier, type of diabetes and phenotype. For cases and controls, we recorded their number, the selection criteria and the implementation of matching criteria. With regard to genotypic data, we extracted the full genotype counts or allele frequencies.

2.2.3. Data Synthesis and Analysis

The association between genotype distribution and disease progression was examined using the generalized odds ratio (ORG) [39,40]. The threshold for meta-analysis was the presence of two studies per genetic variant. The pooled OR was estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird [41] random effects model. The associations are presented with ORs generalized for genotypic data with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The between-study heterogeneity was tested with Cochran’s Q statistic (considered statistically significant at p < 0.10) [42] and we assessed its extent with the I2 statistic [43]. ORG was calculated using a software for implementing the generalized odds ratio methodology for the analysis and meta-analysis of GAS (ORGGASMA) (http://biomath.med.uth.gr accessed on 30 August 2021).
For each study, we examined whether controls confronted with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) predicted genotypes using Fisher’s exact test. For studies providing only allele counts, we relied on the authors’ assessment of deviations from HWE. We also tested for small-study effects with the Egger test [44].

3. Results

3.1. Association Study

The cohort consisted of 190 cases (patients with T2DM and DN), 150 diseased controls (patients with T2DM without DN) and 238 healthy controls. All patients were Caucasians of Greek origin. The demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among 190 cases with DN 11 were diagnosed with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The patients were under treatment for chronic kidney disease, diabetes and hypertension including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) as needed.
The genotype distributions of the five variants (rs2227667, rs2070682, rs1050813, rs2227690, rs2227692) in cases, diseased controls and healthy controls, and the respective ORG, are shown in Table 2. The healthy controls were conformed to HWE for all variants (p ≥ 0.05). There was no significant association in any polymorphism (p ≥ 0.05). We also examined the association between the five variants and disease progression taking into account all possible comparisons (Supplementary Tables S1–S5).
In addition, we examined the correlation between individual genotypes and clinical features (Table 3). Only rs2227692 variant was significantly correlated with creatinine levels (p-value = 0.037). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was also differed statistically significant between healthy controls, diseased controls and diabetic nephropathy cases (p-value < 0.001).

3.2. Meta-Analysis

The literature review identified 240 titles in PubMed that met the inclusion criteria. When an article provided data for different populations, each population was considered as a different study. Figure 1 presents a flowchart of retrieved and excluded articles with specifications of reasons for exclusion. The characteristics of each study are shown in Table 4. Across all available studies, only one polymorphism, 4G>5G (rs1799889), was examined in the context of genetic association studies regarding DN and so meta-analyzed. Statistical significance of rs1799889 was not reported in any analysis (Table 5). The studies comprised 1015 cases, 1001 diseased controls and 659 healthy controls and they were published between 1998 and 2016. Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 are forest plot representations of variant rs1799889.

4. Discussion

In an effort to provide the most comprehensive overview assessing for genetic variation in SERPINE1 gene, we selected five tag SNPs for genotyping in a cohort of Greek origin and we also performed a meta-analysis that included all available genetic data regarding genetic variants of the aforementioned gene.
SERPINE1 gene polymorphisms have been studied in various systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding atherosclerotic diseases [45], risk of venous thromboembolism [46], stroke susceptibility [47] and diabetic nephropathy [32,38,48].
The present association study did not reveal statistical significance for any genotyped tag SNP located in SERPINE1 gene. Similarly, the overall meta-analysis of 4G>5G variant (rs1799889) as well as the subgroup analyses based on diabetes type and ethnicity did not detect any significant association, indicating no implication of SERPINE1 variants in the risk or development of the disease.
In agreement to the findings of the present genetic association study and meta-analysis, De Cosmo et al. (1999) found no association between SERPINE1 4G/5G polymorphism and DN in Europeans patients with T1DM [45]. Similarly, one more study in Caucasians with T1DM did not detect any significant association between twenty-one polymorphisms of SERPINE1 and DN [29].
In contrast to our findings, Dastgheib et al. (2020) found that the PAI-1 4G5G polymorphism was associated with increased risk of DN and diabetic retinopathy (DR) risk [34]. Furthermore, Wong et al. (2000) concluded that SERPINE1 4G/4G is an independent factor for the development of DN in Chinese patients with T2DM and also exhibits a synergistic effect with the allele D of ACE gene on development of DN [27]. In addition, meta-analysis of Xue et al. (2014) reported a significant association between 4G/4G genotype and the risk of developing DN in overall analysis but also in both Asians and T2DM patients with DN [32]. Last but not least, one more meta-analysis showed that the SERPINE1 4G allele might be risk allele for DN susceptibility in the Chinese population [48].
Taking into account the discrepancy in findings derived from different study, it could be suggested that genetic variability in SERPINE1 is influenced by the ethnicity and/or type of diabetes, as many studies conducted in Asians with T2DM detected significant association between genetic variants of SERPINE1 and DN, whereas studies performed in Caucasians with T1DM did not detect any significant association between SERPINE1 and DN. Our suggestion is in agreement with the conclusion of a recent meta-analysis of SERPINE1 rs1799889 variant, in which Chen et al. (2021) concluded that 4G polymorphism could constitute a genetic synergistic factor in overall DM and DN populations, positively for individuals with Asian descent [49]. It is noteworthy to be mentioned that the association of rs1799889 variant was not revealed significant in diabetic retinopathy and cardiovascular risks [49].
Our study design has several strengths out of which clear case definition is one of them. Patients without persistent proteinuria were not considered as cases with DN, since not persistent proteinuria could be reversible and could lead to underestimation of the genetic effect. In addition, we included in the study, healthy controls without diabetes in order to discriminate any variant correlated with diabetes mellitus but not with DN per se. Moreover, the use of ORG is a model-free approach, so it takes advantage of the full genotype distribution and provides a straightforward interpretation of genetic associations. On the other hand, the present study has certain limitations. The sample size of the present case-control study is relatively small raising the possibility of false positive and false negative results, an inherent though limitation of the majority of genetic association studies. Moreover, in the present meta-analysis only studies written in English language were included.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we investigated the role of SERPINE1 gene polymorphisms in the context of a case-control study without statistical significant results for any variant. In an effort to further examine the role of SERPINE1 gene variants in the risk of DN, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis where 4G/5G polymorphism was also not revealed statistical significant. Further studies remain to verify the results of the present meta-analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12121887/s1, Table S1: Genotype frequencies of the participants and results of the association study between healthy controls versus diabetics (with and without diabetic nephropathy), Table S2: Genotype frequencies of the participants and results of the association study between cases versus controls (with and without diabetes), Table S3: Genotype frequencies of the participants and results of the association study between healthy and diseased controls, Table S4: Genotype frequencies of the participants and results of the association study between healthy controls versus cases with diabetic nephropathy, Table S5: Genotype frequencies of the participants and results of the association study between diseased controls versus cases with diabetic nephropathy.

Author Contributions

I.S., G.M.H. and E.T. designed the research, E.D., G.F., S.G., V.S., T.E. and S.V.T. recruited the patients, G.P. conducted the genotyping assays and M.T. performed the statistical analysis and drafted the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This manuscript has received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the University of Thessaly Ethics Committee and informed consent was received from all participants.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

DN diabetic nephropathy;
GWASs Genome-Wide Association Studies;
GWLS Genome-Wide Linkage Studies;
HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium;
MAF Minor Allele Frequency;
ORG Generalized Odds Ratio;
PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1;
serpin serine proteinase inhibitor;
SERPINE1 serpin family E member 1;
SNPs Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms;
T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus;
T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus;
tPA tissue plasminogen activator;
uPA urokinase.

References

  1. Cowie, C.C.; Port, F.K.; Wolfe, R.A.; Savage, P.J.; Moll, P.P.; Hawthorne, V.M. Disparities in incidence of diabetic end-stage renal disease according to race and type of diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 321, 1074–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dronavalli, S.; Duka, I.; Bakris, G. The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 4, 444–452. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18607402 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thomas, M.C.; Brownlee, M.; Susztak, K.; Sharma, K.; Jandeleit-Dahm, K.A.M.; Zoungas, S.; Rossing, P.; Groop, P.-H.; Cooper, M.E. Diabetic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15070. Available online: http://www.nature.com/articles/nrdp201570 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Thomas, M.; Groop, P.-H.; Tryggvason, K. Towards understanding the inherited susceptibility for nephropathy in diabetes. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2012, 21, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cole, J.B.; Florez, J.C. Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020, 16, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lander, E.; Kruglyak, L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: Guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat. Genet. 1995, 11, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cordell, H.J.; Clayton, D.G. Genetic association studies. Lancet 2005, 366, 1121–1131. Available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673605674247 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  8. Iyengar, S.K.; Abboud, H.E.; Goddard, K.A.B.; Saad, M.F.; Adler, S.G.; Arar, N.H.; Bowden, D.W.; Duggirala, R.; Elston, R.C.; Hanson, R.L.; et al. Genome-Wide Scans for Diabetic Nephropathy and Albuminuria in Multiethnic Populations. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1577–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Krolewski, A.S.; Poznik, G.D.; Placha, G.; Canani, L.; Dunn, J.; Walker, W.; Smiles, A.; Krolewski, B.; Fogarty, D.G.; Moczulski, D.; et al. A genome-wide linkage scan for genes controlling variation in urinary albumin excretion in type II diabetes. Kidney Int. 2006, 69, 129–136. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16374433 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Osterholm, A.-M.; He, B.; Pitkaniemi, J.; Albinsson, L.; Berg, T.; Sarti, C.; Tuomilehto, J.; Tryggvason, K. Genome-wide scan for type 1 diabetic nephropathy in the Finnish population reveals suggestive linkage to a single locus on chromosome 3q. Kidney Int. 2007, 71, 140–145. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17021601 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rogus, J.J.; Poznik, G.D.; Pezzolesi, M.G.; Smiles, A.M.; Dunn, J.; Walker, W.; Wanic, K.; Moczulski, D.; Canani, L.; Araki, S.; et al. High-Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genome-Wide Linkage Scan for Susceptibility Genes for Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 1 Diabetes Discordant Sibpair Approach. Diabetes 2008, 57, 2519–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wessman, M.; Forsblom, C.; Kaunisto, M.A.; Söderlund, J.; Ilonen, J.; Sallinen, R.; Hiekkalinna, T.; Parkkonen, M.; Maxwell, A.P.; Tarnow, L.; et al. Novel susceptibility locus at 22q11 for diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24053. Available online: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3164698&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Igo, R.P.; Iyengar, S.K.; Nicholas, S.B.; Goddard, K.a.B.; Langefeld, C.D.; Hanson, R.L.; Duggirala, R.; Divers, J.; Abboud, H.; Adler, S.G.; et al. Genomewide linkage scan for diabetic renal failure and albuminuria: The FIND study. Am. J. Nephrol. 2011, 33, 381–389. Available online: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3078269&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Stefanidis, I.; Tziastoudi, M.; Tsironi, E.E.; Dardiotis, E.; Tachmitzi, S.V.; Fotiadou, A.; Pissas, G.; Kytoudis, K.; Sounidaki, M.; Ampatzis, G.; et al. The contribution of genetic variants of SLC2A1 gene in T2DM and T2DM-nephropathy: Association study and meta-analysis. Ren. Fail. 2018, 40, 561–576. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1496931 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  15. Tachmitzi, S.V.; Tsironi, E.E.; Kotoula, M.G.; Dardiotis, E.; Eleftheriadis, T.; Chatzoulis, D.Z.; Xanthopoulou, P.; Tziastoudi, M.; Koutsiaris, A.G.; Fotiadou, A.; et al. Association between Polymorphisms and Haplotypes in AKR1B1 and Diabetes Type 2 leading to Complications. Int. J. Med. Health Sci. 2015, 4, 430–436. [Google Scholar]
  16. Taira, M.; Imamura, M.; Takahashi, A.; Kamatani, Y.; Yamauchi, T.; Araki, S.-I.; Tanaka, N.; van Zuydam, N.R.; Ahlqvist, E.; Toyoda, M.; et al. A variant within the FTO confers susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Germain, M.; Pezzolesi, M.G.; Sandholm, N.; McKnight, A.J.; Susztak, K.; Lajer, M.; Forsblom, C.; Marre, M.; Parving, H.-H.; Rossing, P.; et al. SORBS1 gene, a new candidate for diabetic nephropathy: Results from a multi-stage genome-wide association study in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. McDonough, C.W.; Palmer, N.D.; Hicks, P.J.; Roh, B.H.; An, S.S.; Cooke, J.N.; Hester, J.M.; Wing, M.R.; Bostrom, M.A.; Rudock, M.E.; et al. A genome-wide association study for diabetic nephropathy genes in African Americans. Kidney Int. 2011, 79, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pezzolesi, M.G.; Poznik, G.D.; Mychaleckyj, J.C.; Paterson, A.D.; Barati, M.T.; Klein, J.B.; Ng, D.P.K.; Placha, G.; Canani, L.H.; Bochenski, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Scan for Diabetic Nephropathy Susceptibility Genes in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes 2009, 58, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Maeda, S.; Osawa, N.; Hayashi, T.; Tsukada, S.; Kobayashi, M.; Kikkawa, R. Genetic variations associated with diabetic nephropathy and type II diabetes in a Japanese population. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2007, 72, S43–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tziastoudi, M.; Stefanidis, I.; Stravodimos, K.; Zintzaras, E. Identification of Chromosomal Regions Linked to Diabetic Nephropathy: A Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Linkage Scans. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2019, 23, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tziastoudi, M.; Stefanidis, I.; Zintzaras, E. The genetic map of diabetic nephropathy: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Clin. Kidney J. 2020, 13, 768–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tziastoudi, M.; Stefanidis, I.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.M.; Stravodimos, K.; Zintzaras, E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of genetic association studies for the role of inflammation and the immune system in diabetic nephropathy. Clin. Kidney J. 2017, 10, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kimura, H.; Gejyo, F.; Suzuki, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Miyazaki, R.; Arakawa, M. Polymorphisms of angiotensin converting enzyme and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 genes in diabetes and macroangiopathy1. Kidney Int. 1998, 54, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. De Cosmo, S.; Margaglione, M.; Tassi, V.; Garrubba, M.; Thomas, S.; Olivetti, C.; Piras, G.P.; Trevisan, R.; Vedovato, M.; Cavallo Perin, P.; et al. ACE, PAI-1, decorin and Werner helicase genes are not associated with the development of renal disease in European patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 1999, 15, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tarnow, L.; Stehouwer, C.D.; Emeis, J.J.; Poirier, O.; Cambien, F.; Hansen, B.V.; Parving, H.-H. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms and diabetic angiopathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2000, 15, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wong, T.Y.; Poon, P.; Szeto, C.C.; Chan, J.C.; Li, P.K. Association of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/4G genotype and type 2 diabetic nephropathy in Chinese patients. Kidney Int. 2000, 57, 632–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, S.; Xue, Y.; Yang, G.; He, F.; Zhao, X. Relationship between plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene 4G/5G polymorphism and type 2 diabetic nephropathy in Chinese Han patients in Guangdong Province. Di 1 Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao Acad. J. First Med. Coll. PLA 2004, 24, 904–907. [Google Scholar]
  29. Martin, R.J.L.; Savage, D.A.; Patterson, C.C.; Brady, H.R.; Maxwell, A.P. Common polymorphisms of the PAI1 gene do not play a major role in the development of diabetic nephropathy in Type 1 diabetes. Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2007, 24, 259–265. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17263760 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  30. Prasad, P.; Tiwari, A.K.; Kumar, K.M.P.; Ammini, A.C.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, R.; Thelma, B.K. Association analysis of ADPRT1, AKR1B1, RAGE, GFPT2 and PAI-1 gene polymorphisms with chronic renal insufficiency among Asian Indians with type-2 diabetes. BMC Med. Genet. 2010, 11, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Xu, F.; Liu, H.; Sun, Y. Association of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene polymorphism and type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Ren. Fail. 2016, 38, 157–162. Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0886022X.2015.1089464 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Xue, C.; Nie, W.; Zhou, C.; Yu, F.; Wang, D.-M.; Dai, B.; Mei, C.-L. 4 G/4 G polymorphism of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene increases the risk of diabetic nephropathy. Ren. Fail. 2014, 36, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xu, K.; Liu, X.; Yang, F.; Cui, D.; Shi, Y.; Shen, C.; Tang, W.; Yang, T. PAI-1-675 4G/5G polymorphism in association with diabetes and diabetic complications susceptibility: A meta-analysis study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79150. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dastgheib, S.A.; Najafi, F.; Shajari, A.; Bahrami, R.; Asadian, F.; Sadeghizadeh-Yazdi, J.; Akbarian, E.; Emarati, S.A.; Neamatzadeh, H. Association of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G5G Polymorphism with risk of diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2020, 19, 2005–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Festa, A.; D’Agostino, R.J.; Tracy, R.P.; Haffner, S.M. Elevated levels of acute-phase proteins and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 predict the development of type 2 diabetes: The insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes 2002, 51, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Gori, A.M.; Marcucci, R.; Fatini, C.; Gensini, F.; Sticchi, E.; Sodi, A.; Cappelli, S.; Menchini, U.; Gensini, G.F.; Abbate, R.; et al. Impaired fibrinolysis in retinal vein occlusion: A role for genetic determinants of PAI-1 levels. Thromb. Haemost. 2004, 92, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Steinberger, J.; Daniels, S.R. Obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in children: An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young Committee (Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young) and the Diabetes Committee (Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism). Circulation 2003, 107, 1448–1453. [Google Scholar]
  38. Siokas, V.; Dardiotis, E.; Sokolakis, T.; Kotoula, M.; Tachmitzi, S.V.; Chatzoulis, D.Z.; Almpanidou, P.; Stefanidis, I.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.M.; Tsironi, E.E. Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type-1 Tag Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Diabetic Retinopathy. Curr. Eye Res. 2017, 42, 1048–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zintzaras, E. The generalized odds ratio as a measure of genetic risk effect in the analysis and meta-analysis of association studies. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2010, 9, 21. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20597847 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  40. Zintzaras, E. The power of generalized odds ratio in assessing association in genetic studies. J. Appl. Stat. 2012, 39, 2569–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. DerSimonian, R.; Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials. 1986, 7, 177–188. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3802833 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  42. Cochran, W. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954, 10, 101–129. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3001666 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  43. Higgins, J.P.T.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12111919 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  44. Egger, M.; Davey Smith, G.; Schneider, M.; Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br. Med. J. 1997, 315, 629–634. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9310563 (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Liu, Y.; Cheng, J.; Guo, X.; Mo, J.; Gao, B.; Zhou, H.; Wu, Y.; Li, Z. The roles of PAI-1 gene polymorphisms in atherosclerotic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 149,908 subjects. Gene 2018, 673, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, Q.; Jin, Y.; Li, X.; Peng, X.; Peng, N.; Song, J.; Xu, M. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G promoter polymorphisms and risk of venous thromboembolism—A meta-analysis and systematic review. VASA Z. Gefasskrankh. 2020, 49, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hu, X.; Zan, X.; Xie, Z.; Li, Y.; Lin, S.; Li, H.; You, C. Association Between Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Genetic Polymorphisms and Stroke Susceptibility. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, W.-F.; Guo, Y.-B.; Bai, Y.; Ding, X.-Y.; Yan, Y.-J.; Wu, Z.-Q. Association between PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy: A meta-analysis in the Chinese population. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2016, 48, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, J.; Zhai, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, R.; Wu, W.; Hou, K.; Alzogool, M.; Wang, Y.; Cong, H. The susceptibility of SERPINE1 rs1799889 SNP in diabetic vascular complications: A meta-analysis of fifty-one case-control studies. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2021, 21, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 12 01887 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of retrieved studies with reasons of exclusion.
Figure 1. Flowchart of retrieved studies with reasons of exclusion.
Genes 12 01887 g001
Genes 12 01887 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest plot of SERPINE1 4G/5G variant between diseased controls versus cases in main meta-analysis.
Figure 2. Forest plot of SERPINE1 4G/5G variant between diseased controls versus cases in main meta-analysis.
Genes 12 01887 g002
Genes 12 01887 g003 550
Figure 3. Forest plot of SERPINE1 4G/5G variant between diseased controls versus cases in T1DM subgroup meta-analysis.
Figure 3. Forest plot of SERPINE1 4G/5G variant between diseased controls versus cases in T1DM subgroup meta-analysis.
Genes 12 01887 g003
Genes 12 01887 g004 550
Figure 4. Forest plot of SERPINE1 4G/5G variant between diseased controls versus cases in T2DM subgroup meta-analysis.
Figure 4. Forest plot of SERPINE1 4G/5G variant between diseased controls versus cases in T2DM subgroup meta-analysis.
Genes 12 01887 g004
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the participants in the association study.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the participants in the association study.
ParametersCase-Control Study Population Groups (n = 578)
HCDMp ValueDM-DNDM + DNp Value
N238340n.a.150190n.a.
Gender [m; n (%)]136 (42.9)181 (57.1)0.36174 (47.7)107 (54.3)0.305
Age (years)71 ± 9.268 ± 8.9<.00168 ± 9.169 ± 8.80.380
DM duration (years)n.a.16.3 ± 8.0n.a.15.7 ± 8.316.8 ± 7.80.203
HbA1cn.d.7.36 ± 1.32n.a.7.20 ± 1.347.47 ± 1.290.064
Insulin treatment (%)n.d.105 (32.3)n.a.50 (32.3)55 (27.9)0.412
Hypertension (%)0222 (63.4)<.00197 (63.0)125 (63.8)0.912
Cardiovascular disease (%)0110 (31.3)<.00141 (26.5)69 (35.0)0.105
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.77 ± 0.151.46 ± 1.37<.0010.90 ± 0.181.85 ± 1.67<0.001
Urea (mg/dL)30 ± 7.959 ± 34<.00142 ± 13.671 ± 38.3<0.001
UACR36.7 ± 63.5470 ± 8560.38243.9 ± 53.4783 ± 1020<0.001
Proteinuria (mg/dL)136.6 ± 118.5788 ± 14680.444105 ± 80.01311 ± 1784<0.001
Table
Table 2. Genotype frequencies of the participants and results of the association study.
Table 2. Genotype frequencies of the participants and results of the association study.
VariantGenotypeDNORG (95% CI)
HealthyDiseased ControlsCases
rs2227667AA110721000.85 (0.66, 1.08)
GA1066369
GG181414
rs2070682TT8151740.97 (0.77, 1.23)
TC1267183
CC302532
rs1050813GG1581131290.92 (0.69, 1.23)
AG673150
AA856
rs2227690AA153931320.87 (0.66, 1.15)
GA774452
GG675
rs2227692CC1841191530.88 (0.64, 1.23)
CT523033
TT214
Table
Table 3. Correlation of clinical features with individual genotypes.
Table 3. Correlation of clinical features with individual genotypes.
Clinical Featuresp-Value
rs2227667rs2070682rs1050813rs2227690rs2227692
DM duration0.8060.1780.8060.2990.619
HbA1c0.3570.7200.7510.2640.704
Insulin0.5220.2230.9270.8710.712
Hypertension0.6440.1440.8490.3920.826
CVD0.6440.3340.9450.4640.788
Creatinine0.5000.1990.4910.4800.037
Urea0.4980.6740.1380.2900.687
UACR0.3060.6880.3280.8330.609
Proteinuria0.5740.9050.2170.5920.859
eGFR0.1950.9700.0880.3100.609
Table
Table 4. Demographic characteristics of the participants of the included studies in the meta-analysis.
Table 4. Demographic characteristics of the participants of the included studies in the meta-analysis.
SERPINE1 rs1799768Dastgheib (2020) [34] E. Asians33520873T2DMDN118macr/ria120norm/ria without diabetic retinopathy DC-C
Xu (2016) [31]E. Asians26616527T2DMDN33macr/ria44norm/ria DC-C, HT-DC-C, HT-C
Prasad (2010) [30]Asian Indians20353610T2DMDN196CRI, serum Cr. ≥ 3.0 mg/dL225normal renal function and norm/ria, DM duration ≥ 10 yrs matched for age, ethnicity DC-C
Martin (2007) [29]Caucasians17263760T1DMDN222DM ≥ 10 yrs, pers. proteinuria, DR, no evidence of non-diabetic renal disease361DM > 15 yrs, pers. norm/ria, no anti-HT meds, background DR86non-diabetics DC-C, HT-DC-C, HT-C
Tarnow (2000) [26]Caucasians10809802T1DMDN198diabetic glomerulosclerosis, pers. macr/ria, retinopathy192pers. norm/ria age, gender, DM duration NoDC-C
Wong (2000) [27]E. Asians10652041T2DMDN95pers. micro/macroalbuminuriaor dialysis46pers. norm/ria, DM duration > 12 yrs matched for age, gender NoDC-C, HT-DC-C, HT-C
De Cosmo (1999) [25]Caucasians10495473T1DMDN175micro/macroalbuminuria, retinopathy136norm/ria, DM > 15 yrs200non-diabetics DC-C, HT-DC-C, HT-C
Kimura (1998) [24]E. Asians9844142T2DMDN98overt proteinuria, impaired renal function, DR or ESRD requiring dialysis -177non-diabetics HT-C
Table
Table 5. Statistically significant results from meta-analysis of 4G/5G polymorphism.
Table 5. Statistically significant results from meta-analysis of 4G/5G polymorphism.
Diseased Controls versus Cases
GenePolymorphismRs numberNCases/ControlsRE ORGLL ORG UL ORGI2PQPE
SERPINE1c.-821_-820insG (4G>5G)rs179976871035/11210.91 0.78 1.06 6.76 0.34 0.13
SERPINE1All in HWE 4626/7640.880.741.0600.980.17
T1DM/Caucasians
SERPINE14G>5Grs17997683594/6880.930.771.1300.780.08
T2DM/Asians
SERPINE14G>5Grs17997684518/5030.85 0.60 1.21 51.08 0.11 0.15
SERPINE14G>5Grs17997682400/3830.860.641.1600.830.12
Healthy Controls versus Diseased Controls versus Cases
SERPINE1c.-821_-820insG (4G>5G)rs17997684 0.90.761.0514.570.320
T1DM/Caucasians
SERPINE1 2 0.960.811.1400.83-
T2DM/Asians
SERPINE1 2 0.740.531.04 -
Healthy Controls versus Cases
SERPINE1c.-821_-820insG (4G>5G)rs17997685622/6590.920.741.139.020.360.07
T1DM/Caucasians
SERPINE1c.-821_-820insG (4G>5G)rs17997682 0.960.731.2500.70-
T2DM/Asians
SERPINE1c.-821_-820insG (4G>5G)rs17997683 0.830.551.2750.870.13-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tziastoudi, M.; Dardiotis, E.; Pissas, G.; Filippidis, G.; Golfinopoulos, S.; Siokas, V.; Tachmitzi, S.V.; Eleftheriadis, T.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.M.; Tsironi, E.; et al. Serpin Family E Member 1 Tag Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: An Association Study and Meta-Analysis Using a Genetic Model-Free Approach. Genes 2021, 12, 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12121887

AMA Style

Tziastoudi M, Dardiotis E, Pissas G, Filippidis G, Golfinopoulos S, Siokas V, Tachmitzi SV, Eleftheriadis T, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Tsironi E, et al. Serpin Family E Member 1 Tag Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: An Association Study and Meta-Analysis Using a Genetic Model-Free Approach. Genes. 2021; 12(12):1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12121887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tziastoudi, Maria, Efthimios Dardiotis, Georgios Pissas, Georgios Filippidis, Spyridon Golfinopoulos, Vasileios Siokas, Sophia V. Tachmitzi, Theodoros Eleftheriadis, Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou, Evangelia Tsironi, and et al. 2021. "Serpin Family E Member 1 Tag Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: An Association Study and Meta-Analysis Using a Genetic Model-Free Approach" Genes 12, no. 12: 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12121887

APA Style

Tziastoudi, M., Dardiotis, E., Pissas, G., Filippidis, G., Golfinopoulos, S., Siokas, V., Tachmitzi, S. V., Eleftheriadis, T., Hadjigeorgiou, G. M., Tsironi, E., & Stefanidis, I. (2021). Serpin Family E Member 1 Tag Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: An Association Study and Meta-Analysis Using a Genetic Model-Free Approach. Genes, 12(12), 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12121887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop