Next Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Database Analysis of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Phenylketonuria Diagnosis by Massive Parallel Sequencing and Genotype-Phenotype Association in Brazilian Patients
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Germline c.1267T>A MEN1 Mutation in MEN1 Family—from Phenotype to Gene and Back
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biomarkers of Fabry Nephropathy: Review and Future Perspective
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Fucosidosis—Clinical Manifestation, Long-Term Outcomes, and Genetic Profile—Review and Case Series

Genes 2020, 11(11), 1383; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111383
by Karolina M. Stepien 1,*, Elżbieta Ciara 2 and Aleksandra Jezela-Stanek 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Genes 2020, 11(11), 1383; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111383
Submission received: 10 October 2020 / Revised: 10 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published: 22 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Genomics of Inherited Metabolic Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors Stepien Ciara and Jezela-Stanek present a complete and interesting review of fucosidosis.

Fucosidosis is an extremely rare disease and I have to admit that I haven't seen any patient with fucosidosis.

The manuscript is quite complete.

My only comments refer to the introduction that I found not very clear: Lines 31 -33 need to be clarified. Authors do not explicit clearly the role of fucosidase. The lines 31-33 are confusing and may be replaced later.

 

The manuscript is very interesting and give a complete overview of the disease.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author Response

The authors Stepien Ciara and Jezela-Stanek present a complete and interesting review of fucosidosis.

Fucosidosis is an extremely rare disease and I have to admit that I haven't seen any patient with fucosidosis.

The manuscript is quite complete.

My only comments refer to the introduction that I found not very clear: Lines 31 -33 need to be clarified. Authors do not explicit clearly the role of fucosidase. The lines 31-33 are confusing and may be replaced later.

RESPONSE: It has now been clarified and a sentence was added:

‘As a result of the hydrolytic enzyme deficiency, incomplete catabolism of N- and O-glycosylproteins results in the accumulation …’

The manuscript is very interesting and give a complete overview of the disease.

RESPONSE: Thank you

Reviewer 2 Report

 

This is a detailed review of an ultra-rare disease, fucosidosis. Some considerations:

  1. You say in abstract: Fucosidosis is a lysosomal storage disease (LSD) is a neurodegenerative disorder which 13 progresses inexorably. But this is not well expressed, it should be reviewed
  2. t is also said: Only 36 pathogenic variants in the FUCA1 gene are associated with fucosidosis. this is not correct, it must be said at the current time or date
  3. It would also be positive to comment on the abstract about the genotype-phenotype relationship
  4. Some reference number like number 4 is not well expressed

Author Response

This is a detailed review of an ultra-rare disease, fucosidosis. Some considerations:

  1. You say in abstract: Fucosidosis is a lysosomal storage disease (LSD) is a neurodegenerative disorder which 13 progresses inexorably. But this is not well expressed, it should be reviewed

RESPONSE: It has now been corrected to:

‘Fucosidosis is a neurodegenerative disorder which progresses inexorably’.

  1. It is also said: Only 36 pathogenic variants in the FUCA1 gene are associated with fucosidosis. this is not correct, it must be said at the current time or date

RESPONSE: It is correct and it is further explained in line 75-76:

‘Only 36 pathogenic variants in the FUCA1 gene reported in HGMD are associated with fucosidosis, so far (www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk ; updated November 10, 2020) [25] (Table 1).’

  1. It would also be positive to comment on the abstract about the genotype-phenotype relationship

RESPONSE: The sentence has been added in the abstract:

‘The genotype-phenotype correlation has not been well defined.’

  1. Some reference number like number 4 is not well expressed

RESPONSE: It has now been corrected in line 29.

 

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The suggested modifications have been made and I accept the article 

Back to TopTop