Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Functional Diversity in Salivary Glands of Plant Virus Vector, Graminella nigrifrons
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic and Clinical Findings in an Ethnically Diverse Cohort with Retinitis Pigmentosa Associated with Pathogenic Variants in CERKL
Previous Article in Journal
Overexpression of Two CCCH-type Zinc-Finger Protein Genes Leads to Pollen Abortion in Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Frmd7 Knock-Out Mice Generated by the EUCOMM/COMP Repository as a Model for Idiopathic Infantile Nystagmus (IIN)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/genes11111288
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Pathogenic Sequence Variants in NR2E3 and Clinical Findings in Three Patients

by
Saoud Al-khuzaei
1,
Suzanne Broadgate
2,
Stephanie Halford
2,
Jasleen K. Jolly
1,2,
Morag Shanks
3,
Penny Clouston
3 and
Susan M. Downes
1,2,*
1
Oxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
2
Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Level 6 John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
3
Oxford Medical Genetics Laboratory, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(11), 1288; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111288
Submission received: 28 September 2020 / Revised: 21 October 2020 / Accepted: 28 October 2020 / Published: 29 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomics and Therapeutics of Hereditary Eye Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A retrospective review of the clinical records of patients seen at the Oxford Eye Hospital identified as having NR2E3 mutations was performed. The data included symptoms, best-corrected visual acuity, multimodal retinal imaging, visual fields and electrophysiology testing. Three participants were identified with biallelic NR2E3 pathogenic sequence variants detected using a targeted NGS gene panel, two of which were novel. Participant I was a Nepalese male aged 68 years, and participants II and III were white Caucasian females aged 69 and 10 years old, respectively. All three had childhood onset nyctalopia, a progressive decrease in central vision, and visual field loss. Patients I and III had photopsia, patient II had photosensitivity and patient III also had photophobia. Visual acuities in patients I and II were preserved even into the seventh decade, with the worst visual acuity measured at 6/36. Visual field constriction was severe in participant I, less so in II, and fields were full to bright targets targets in participant III. Electrophysiology testing in all three demonstrated loss of rod function. The three patients share some of the typical distinctive features of NR2E3 retinopathies, as well as a novel clinical observation of foveal ellipsoid thickening.

1. Introduction

Inherited retinal dystrophies are a heterogeneous group of diseases with varying degrees of severity, age at onset and inheritance patterns. Retinal dystrophies associated with the gene NR2E3 (nuclear receptor subfamily, 2 group, E member 3) can be inherited as either autosomal recessive or dominant. NR2E3 retinal dystrophies include enhanced S-cone syndrome (ESCS) (ESCS, OMIM#268100) [1], a rare autosomal recessive condition, first described by Marmor et al. in 1990 [2]. Fundoscopy typically shows nummular pigmentary deposition at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium external to the vascular arcades with macular changes often associated with intra-retinal cysts [3,4]. Histopathologic analysis of a post-mortem retina affected by ESCS showed a highly degenerate and disorganised retina characterised by the absence of rods, and twice the number of expected cones. Intermixed cones are observed to be densely packed with the inner retinal neurons [5]. By using adaptive optics imaging in NR2E3 retinas, a higher than normal density of cones has been shown to be present in the perifoveal retina, with smaller outer segment cone diameters [6]. Analysis of electroretinograms in patients with ECSC by Hood et al. supports the observation that there are many more S-cones than in a normal retina [7].
ESCS typically presents with an abnormally large S-cone response in the majority of patients with an associated undetectable rod-specific response. The relative increase in S-cone function compared to the L and M cone function is pathognomonic, and is not affected by disease severity [8,9]. Standard single flashes under both scotopic and photopic responses tend to be attenuated and delayed and of similar amplitude under both light conditions [3,8]. The 30 Hz flicker response displays a delayed peak time and reduced amplitude and the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) varies from normal to undetectable [3]. These changes are present from a young age, and are slowly progressive with increasing disease severity [10]; thus, ESCS electrophysiological features are very distinctive [3,8,10].
Two other conditions have also been associated with autosomal recessive NR2E3 mutations, Goldmann–Favre Syndrome (GFS), first described in the 1950s [11], and clumped pigmentary retinal degeneration (CPRD) [12]. GFS manifests as night blindness or a progressive decrease in visual acuity in the first decade of life [13,14,15]. Typical features include hyper-pigmented Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) clumps accumulating along the retinal vascular arcades, areas of choroidal atrophy, a cystoid or schitic fovea, with central and/or peripheral retinoschisis, and vitreous degeneration. CPRD typically shows clinically visible clumped pigmentation in the mid-peripheral fundus in all four quadrants and is associated with minimal evidence of bone spicule pigmentation [16]. More recently, it has been suggested that GFS and clumped pigmentary retinopathy associated with NR2E3 mutations could be considered part of the expanded phenotype of ESCS; both conditions share similar electrophysiological features to ESCS [8,17,18,19,20]. The NR2E3 gene was identified by Kobayashi and colleagues in 1999 it is located on chromosome 15q23, comprises eight exons, spans approximately 7.7kb of genomic DNA and encodes a 410-amino acid protein (Figure 1) [21]. NR2E3 is a member of a large family of nuclear receptor transcription factors and the protein shows the characteristic structure of a DNA-binding domain and a putative ligand-binding region separated by a hinge region (Figure 1) [21,22]. It is expressed in the outer nuclear layer of the retina [1], and is found in both developing and adult rod photoreceptors [5,23,24]. NR2E3 acts as a transcriptional regulator and has been shown to activate rod-specific genes as well as repressing cone-specific genes acting in tandem with other retinal transcription factors including cone-rod otx-like photoreceptor homeobox transcription factor (CRX) and neural retina leucine zipper transcription factor (NRL) [24,25,26,27,28].
In this study, we describe the detailed clinical features in three patients with NR2E3 mutations and report two novel pathogenic sequence variants.

2. Materials and Methods

Three of 4 patients identified to have NR2E3 pathogenic variants by the Oxford Molecular Genetics Laboratory were included in this study; the fourth patient had been previously reported by Cehajic-Kapentanovic et al. [29]. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki with Ethics approval obtained from the local research ethics committee (reference 08/H0302/96) and informed written consent was obtained from all patients.

2.1. Literature Search

A literature search was performed to identify reports of NR2E3 pathogenic sequence variants (Supplementary Table S1).

2.2. Clinical Data

The clinical data of 3 patients (I, II, III) identified as having 2 NR2E3 variants by the clinical laboratory were reviewed. Data extracted included age, sex, family history and pedigrees, ethnicity, history of symptom onset and any associated conditions, clinical assessment included best corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, pseudo-colour fundus imaging using a wide field scanning laser ophthalmoscope (optomap; Optos), short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (AF) (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT; Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany); Goldmann visual fields and electrodiagnostic testing were obtained from the electronic and clinical notes. The Heidelberg software was used for retinal segmentation of the ganglion cell layer (GC) and the inner plexiform layer (IPL) which were then used to measure the thickness of the GCIPL thickness in the nasal temporal areas and inferior part of the central macula, which are summarised in Supplementary Table S2. Electroretinography was performed in accordance with the standards of the International Society of Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) using DTL fibre electrodes and an impedance <5 kOhms in pupils dilated with 1% tropicamide [30].

2.3. Molecular Genetic Analysis

Genetic analysis was performed at the Oxford Regional Genetics Laboratory, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust as part of the patient’s routine care, as described previously [31]. Samples were prepared using Agilent’s HaloPlex™ Target Enrichment system for a 111-gene panel, followed by next generation sequencing on Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. All findings were validated by Sanger sequencing. In silico analysis using 3 different prediction methods were used to determine the deleteriousness of the variants, Polyphen2 (available at http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/, accessed on 1 June 2020) [32], Sorting Intolerant from Tolerance (SIFT) (available at http://sift.jcvi.org/, accessed on 1 June 2020) [33] and Mutation Taster (available at http://www.mutationtaster.org/, accessed on 1 June 2020) [34], on the variants identified (Table 1).

3. Results

NR2E3 variants were identified in three patients, from unrelated families, who had been diagnosed with retinal dystrophy (Table 1). The pedigrees of the families and imaging are presented in Figure 2 and the clinical findings are summarised in Table 2.

3.1. Patient I

A 70-year-old Nepalese male with nyctalopia since his 20s underwent a review at 66 years of age reporting the onset of flashing lights, increasing constriction of his visual fields and blurred central vision. Examination revealed visual acuities of 6/19 OD and 6/24 OS. Goldmann visual fields (GVF) showed less than five degrees of field preservation. He had a posterior subcapsular lens opacity OD. Fundoscopy through dilated pupils revealed a dense concentric band of pigment and atrophy extending from the arcades into the mid peripheral retina. Autofluorescence (AF) imaging showed a dense loss of AF signal extending from the arcades into the mid periphery consistent with the band of atrophy, with increased AF at both maculae extending to the nasal area. OCT showed central preservation of the retina, vitreomacular traction in OD, and focal thickening at the fovea of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and loss temporally, but no oedema (Figure 2A). Electrophysiology testing demonstrated severe widespread rod, cone, macular and RPE dysfunction; however, S-cone testing revealed a residual response (Figure 3). Genetic testing identified a previously reported c.226C > T, p.(R76W) mutation [1,35] and a novel mutation c.1048C > G, p.(Q350E) in NR2E3 (Figure 1).

3.2. Patient II

A 69-year-old white Caucasian female with a lifelong history of nyctalopia and abnormal colour vision since the age of 45 was initially diagnosed with retinal dystrophy at the age of 40 years. She had a previous medical history of diabetes and vitiligo. Her brother also has a diagnosis of Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and diabetes (but no other details were available). An examination revealed visual acuities of 6/36 + 1 OD and 6/36 OS. Anterior segment review showed bilateral early cataract, minimal epiretinal membranes (Figure 2B). Fundoscopy revealed concentric nummular clumped pigmentary deposition at the vascular arcades and extending into the mid periphery, which was more pronounced in the temporal and nasal areas with white spots in the far periphery. AF imaging showed mildly increased AF at the maculae and decreased AF extending from the vascular arcades into the midperiphery in a similar distribution to the clumped pigment seen on fundoscopy. The features on OCT imaging included significant thickening at the fovea and parafoveal region in the EZ and in the right eye an incipient lamellar hole (Figure 2B). Electrophysiology testing showed a pattern consistent with ESCS (Figure 3). The PERG was almost extinguished. Both rods and cones were grossly affected, with a similarly reduced and delayed response to standard flash under both scotopic and photopic conditions. The 30Hz flicker was markedly abnormal in the presence of a large S-cone response. Genetic testing identified that she was homozygous for the common NR2E3 splicing variant, c.119-2A > C [1] (see Supplementary Table S1 for other references). Taken together, these findings are consistent with the pigmentary clumping subgroup of NR2E3 phenotypes.

3.3. Patient III

A 16-year-old girl presented with symptoms at the age of 10 years; these included photophobia, photosensitivity, photopsia, and nyctalopia. Examination revealed visual acuities of 6/4 OD and 6/5 OS with refraction of +0.75/−0.75 × 30 OD and L +1.00/−1.00 × 140 OS. Fundoscopy revealed an atrophic concentric band with white punctate dots and minimal pigment extending from the vascular arcades to the mid-peripheral retina circumferential to the macula. Visual fields showed decreased sensitivity from 10 degrees to 40 degrees on Goldmann visual field testing. Colour vision testing with colour contrast sensitivity showed reduced protan thresholds and normal tritan responses. An increased (AF) signal was seen at the macula and extending to the nasal area. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed loss of the EZ in the area of the band, with preservation of the central retina (Figure 2C). The ERG results demonstrated extinguished rod-specific dim flash responses and reduced and delayed responses to standard flash under both photopic and scotopic conditions. Response to the 30 Hz flicker stimulus was abnormal but the PERG was relatively well preserved. Isolated S-cone responses were not measured. The marked reduction to rod stimuli and 30 Hz flicker with reduced responses to standard flash is consistent with an ESCS phenotype (Figure 3). Genetic molecular analysis showed compound heterozygosity for NR2E3 c.119−2A > C [1] (see Supplementary Table S1 for other references) and a novel mutation c.639_640insT, p.(P214SfsX39). Segregation analysis in her parents identified the NR2E3 variant c.639_640insT, p.(P214SfsX39) in her father, and the c.119-2A > C variant in her mother.

4. Discussion

Disease-causing mutations in NR2E3 have been found to be located throughout the gene, but are predominantly found in the regions of the gene encoding the DNA binding domain (amino acids 45-131) and ligand binding domain (amino acids 223–410) of the NR2E3 protein (see Supplementary Table S1 and Figure 1). The most frequently reported mutations in NR2E3 are c.119-2A > C, p.(V41AfsX23) and c.932G > A, p.(R311Q) (see Supplementary Table S1 for references).
The mechanisms underlying the differing retinal phenotypes associated with NR2E3 variants remain unclear. However, there is a naturally occurring mouse model of Nr2e3, the rd7 mouse, which has a 380 bp deletion of the coding region that removes amino acids 110-236, and generates a frameshift and premature stop codon. The protein that is produced is most likely subjected to nonsense-mediated decay. The equivalent region in the human sequence is between amino acid 117 and 249. This deletion would result in the loss of the 3′ end of the DNA binding domain, the entire hinge region and helixes 3 and 4 of the ligand binding domain (Figure 1). The rd7 mouse, shows up to a twofold increase in S-cones [36]. Chen et al. showed that Nr2e3 is expressed exclusively in rods in this mouse model, and that expression of Nr2e3 is one of the earliest events in rod photoreceptor development and that it suppresses cone-specific genes [25]. The loss of Nr2e3 also leads to the de-repression of cone specific genes in rods and Chen et al. suggest that the misexpression of many of these cone transcripts may have toxic consequences for the rod cells and can result in the degeneration of the rods that is seen in patients with NR2E3 variants. However, Xie et al. did not identify an excess number of S-cones using Nr2e3 knock out zebrafish, created using CRISPR technology [37]. They demonstrated both the normal development and number of cones, with no excess of S-cones, and showed that the L and M cones progressively degenerated. They also demonstrated that rod precursors failed to differentiate into rods; rod-specific genes were not expressed, and rod outer segments did not develop [37].
In our patient cohort, we identified two novel mutations in NR2E3: c.1048C > G, p.(Q350E) in patient I, and c.639_640insT, p.(P214SfsX39) in patient III. The previously reported mutations were as follows: c.226C > T, p.(R76W), was seen in patient I; c.119-2A > C was seen as homozygous in patient II and heterozygous in patient III (Table 1). All three patients showed signs of pigment clumping that extended in a band from the vascular arcades to the mid-periphery with a characteristic corresponding band of a decreased signal in AF extending from the vascular arcades to the mid periphery, which is consistent with the literature regarding patients with recessive NR2E3 mutations [3,8,19,35,38,39,40,41]. An increased macular AF signal was also noted. White spots were seen in the periphery in patient II and in the band in patient III, but were smaller and less sparse than those described by Murro et al. [35]. The distribution of white deposits located within the band is consistent with the paediatric patients with NR2E3 variants described by Cassiman et al. and Hull et al. [10,42]. These features are consistent with an early stage of the disease prior to the development of pigment clumping seen later in life. This is consistent with the observations made by Hull et al. who proposed that retinal disease secondary to NR2E3 variants is progressive, and showed this in their paediatric population, describing a sequence of change from a normal fundus appearance to RPE mottling along the arcades, with development of white dots with subsequent deposition of nummular pigment [10]. Cassiman et al. reported a paediatric phenotype of NR2E3 patients with submacular haemorrhage and preretinal fibrosis before the appearance of macular nummular pigmentary deposition at the level of the RPE [42]. Patient III showed no evidence of this. Moreover, none of the three patients reported here had cystoid or schitic changes at the macula, as has been described as a typical or common appearance in NR2E3 recessive retinopathies [2,3]. None of the three patients showed a double or triple hyperfluorescent ring sign as reported by Escher et al. on AF imaging [43]. Notably, in patient II particularly, and also in patient I, a focal significant thickening of the ellipsoid layer at the fovea was observed (Figure 2A,B).
The electrophysiology testing in all the patients was consistent with an NR2E3 retinopathy, two presenting with features of ESCS and one with RP characteristics. Patient I presented with severe general retinal degeneration. Interestingly, patients II and III showed extinguished responses to rod-specific dim flash, reduced to 30 Hz flicker, and reduced to standard flash in both in both photopic and scotopic conditions. These are in keeping with previous reports. The literature shows that the visual acuities in NR2E3 retinopathies are variable; in these three patients, the visual acuities were relatively good. However, patients I and II had less than five degrees of visual field.
It is clear, upon reviewing all the previously reported studies (see Supplementary Table S1), that severity varies considerably in the retinopathies associated with NR2E3. This study, reporting 3 cases with variable age at onset, sex and ethnicity, is consistent with this finding. To date, no clear phenotype-genotype correlation has been identified in NR2E3 retinopathies. Indeed, phenotypic appearance can vary even when patients have the same variant. For example, Bandah et al. described phenotypes associated with the c.119-2A > C variant ranging from minimal fundoscopic changes with retinal flecks and a preserved foveal structure in a 19-year-old, compared to a 16-year-old with patches of deep chorioretinal atrophy with macular involvement, and a 20-year-old with perimacular atrophy, classic pigment clumps beyond the arcades, and severe cystoid macular oedema [44]. Most previous studies have suggested that the c.119-2A > C variant causes the skipping of exon 2 and a premature termination codon in exon 3, leading to nonsense-mediated decay of the aberrant protein [44,45]. However, in a study by Bohrer et al. using patient induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSCs), the authors suggest that a cryptic acceptor site in intron 1 is activated by the variant and a region of intron one is incorporated into the transcript as well as exon two, which would also result in a termination codon in exon 3 [46]. It has been suggested by Bandah et al. that, due to the mutation occurring in the second intronic base of the donor splice site, a variable amount of wild type protein can still be generated in patients with the c.119-2A > C variant [44]. Taken together, these data suggest that the c.119-2A > C variant is complex and may behave differently between patients. The presence of a variable amount of protein may explain the variability in the phenotype in patients harbouring this variant.
Two of the three patients described here carry the c.119-2A > C variant. Patient II is homozygous and Patient III carries the variant heterozygously in trans with a c.639_640insT variant that results in the frameshift p.(P214SX39). Patients I and II are older and it may have been expected that their phenotype would have been more severe due to prolonged disease progression, however, Patient III has quite severe disease at an early age. The variants in patient III are both frameshift mutations which are predicted to produce truncated proteins which will most likely be cleared by nonsense-mediated decay. Thus, the variant c.119-2A > C can result in a variable amount of protein and may, in this case, produce very little wild-type protein, leading to the severe phenotype.
Patient I harbours two missense variants, the previously reported p.(R76W) and the novel p.(Q350E), which are located in the DNA binding domain and the ligand binding domain, respectively. Previous studies have shown that the p.(R76W) variant results in non-specific DNA binding and the protein mis-localising to the cytoplasm [47]. The p.(Q350E) is novel to this study, but previous studies have investigated the nonsense mutation at this position p.(Q350X) [16,48]. The glutamine at position 350 is located in helix nine of the ligand binding domain, close to the dimer interface and p.(Q350X) protein has been shown to mis-localise in the cytoplasm [47].
There are many factors can influence the range of phenotypes seen in a disease including; epigenetic factors, environment, allelic heterogeneity and genetic modifiers [45,49,50]. The presence of as yet unidentified polymorphisms in other genes known to interact with NR2E3 such as NRL, CRX, NEUROD1, RORA and TRβ2 may also be influencing the phenotypic outcome [26].

5. Conclusions

NR2E3 retinopathies are very rare, we describe three patients in whom NR2E3 mutations have been identified, of which two are novel. The typical features previously described including a band of atrophic retinal pigment epithelium, white dots, and nummular pigment deposition were seen in our patients. We also identified a focal foveal thickening at the level of the EZ. This study shows that macular cystoid or schitic changes are not always present in NR2E3 retinopathies. In view of the variable phenotypes, we propose that the three entities ESCS, CPRD and GFS are renamed NR2E3 retinopathies, listing key features, which would include visual acuity, field measurements, the presence of oedema, and electrophysiological characterisation to help in determining prognosis. OCT imaging is becoming increasingly used as an outcome measure in retinal therapies to assess response to treatment; thus, characterising novel OCT features in specific diseases is very relevant.
Interestingly, a recent study of a mouse model has shown that delivery of NR2E3 to retinal cells stabilises disease progression [50]. With potential treatment prospects in the pipeline, obtaining a genetic diagnosis and characterising the phenotype in depth is of increasing importance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/11/1288/s1, Table S1: Variants identified in NR2E3 to date; Table S2: The thickness of the of ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer in the nasal, temporal and inferior retina. References [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and S.M.D.; collection of patient data, S.A.-k. and S.M.D.; investigation, S.A.-k., S.B., S.H., J.K.J., M.S., P.C. and S.M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.-k, S.B., S.H., and S.M.D.; writing—review and editing, S.A.-k., S.B., S.H., J.K.J., M.S., P.C. and S.M.D.; supervision, S.H. and S.M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Thames Valley and South Midlands Clinical Research Network provided funding support for the clinical aspects of this study. Saoud Al-khuzaei is supported by a scholarship from the Qatar National Research Fund (GSRA6-1-0329-19010).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Eye Research Group Oxford (ERGO) for their support of this study, in particular Alexina Fantato, Clare Arnison-Newgass, Sophie Marlowe, and Lidia Milla, as well as the patients who agreed to participate in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Haider, N.B.; Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Swiderski, R.; Streb, L.M.; Searby, C.; Beck, G.; Hockey, R.; Hanna, D.B.; Gorman, S.; et al. Mutation of a nuclear receptor gene, NR2E3, causes enhanced S cone syndrome, a disorder of retinal cell fate. Nat. Genet. 2000, 24, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marmor, M.F.; Jacobson, S.G.; Foerster, M.H.; Kellner, U.; Weleber, R.G. Diagnostic clinical findings of a new syndrome with night blindness, maculopathy, and enhanced S cone sensitivity. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1990, 110, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Audo, I.; Michaelides, M.; Robson, A.G.; Hawlina, M.; Vaclavik, V.; Sandbach, J.M.; Neveu, M.M.; Hogg, C.R.; Hunt, D.M.; Moore, A.T.; et al. Phenotypic variation in enhanced S-cone syndrome. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 2082–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gelman, R.; Greenberg, J.P.; Duncker, T.; Nguyen, H.V.; Yannuzzi, L.A.; Tsang, S.H. Hyperautofluorescent macular ring in a series of patients with enhanced S-cone syndrome. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2014, 45, 592–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Milam, A.H.; Rose, L.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Barakat, M.R.; Tang, W.X.; Gupta, N.; Aleman, T.S.; Wright, A.F.; Stone, E.M.; Sheffield, V.C.; et al. The nuclear receptor NR2E3 plays a role in human retinal photoreceptor differentiation and degeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ammar, M.J.; Scavelli, K.T.; Uyhazi, K.E.; Bedoukian, E.C.; Serrano, L.W.; Edelstein, I.D.; Vergilio, G.; Cooper, R.F.; Morgan, J.I.W.; Kumar, P.; et al. Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome: Visual Function, Cross-Sectional Imaging, and Cellular Structure with Adaptive Optics Ophthalmoscopy. Retin. Cases Brief Rep. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hood, D.C.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Roman, A.J.; Jacobson, S.G. Enhanced S cone syndrome: Evidence for an abnormally large number of S cones. Vis. Res. 1995, 35, 1473–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pachydaki, S.I.; Klaver, C.C.; Barbazetto, I.A.; Roy, M.S.; Gouras, P.; Allikmets, R.; Yannuzzi, L.A. Phenotypic features of patients with NR2E3 mutations. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009, 127, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Roman, A.J.; Jacobson, S.G. S cone-driven but not S cone-type electroretinograms in the enhanced S cone syndrome. Exp. Eye Res. 1991, 53, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hull, S.; Arno, G.; Sergouniotis, P.I.; Tiffin, P.; Borman, A.D.; Chandra, A.; Robson, A.G.; Holder, G.E.; Webster, A.R.; Moore, A.T. Clinical and molecular characterization of enhanced S-cone syndrome in children. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014, 132, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Favre, M. Two cases of hyaloid-retinal degeneration. Ophthalmologica 1958, 135, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. To, K.W.; Adamian, M.; Jakobiec, F.A.; Berson, E.L. Clinical and histopathologic findings in clumped pigmentary retinal degeneration. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1996, 114, 950–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Batioglu, F. Goldmann-Favre vitreoretinal degeneration. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 13, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fishman, G.A.; Jampol, L.M.; Goldberg, M.F. Diagnostic features of the Favre-Goldmann syndrome. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1976, 60, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chavala, S.H.; Sari, A.; Lewis, H.; Pauer, G.J.; Simpson, E.; Hagstrom, S.A.; Traboulsi, E.I. An Arg311Gln NR2E3 mutation in a family with classic Goldmann-Favre syndrome. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 89, 1065–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nakamura, Y.; Hayashi, T.; Kozaki, K.; Kubo, A.; Omoto, S.; Watanabe, A.; Toda, K.; Takeuchi, T.; Gekka, T.; Kitahara, K. Enhanced S-cone syndrome in a Japanese family with a nonsense NR2E3 mutation (Q350X). Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2004, 82, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Udar, N.; Small, K.; Chalukya, M.; Silva-Garcia, R.; Marmor, M. Developmental or degenerative--NR2E3 gene mutations in two patients with enhanced S cone syndrome. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 519–525. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cima, I.; Brecelj, J.; Sustar, M.; Coppieters, F.; Leroy, B.P.; De Baere, E.; Hawlina, M. Enhanced S-cone syndrome with preserved macular structure and severely depressed retinal function. Doc. Ophthalmol. Adv. Ophthalmol. 2012, 125, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Collison, F.T.; Park, J.C.; Fishman, G.A.; Stone, E.M.; McAnany, J.J. Two-color pupillometry in enhanced S-cone syndrome caused by NR2E3 mutations. Doc. Ophthalmol. Adv. Ophthalmol. 2016, 132, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kuniyoshi, K.; Hayashi, T.; Sakuramoto, H.; Mishima, H.; Tsuneoka, H.; Tsunoda, K.; Iwata, T.; Shimomura, Y. New truncation mutation of the NR2E3 gene in a Japanese patient with enhanced S-cone syndrome. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 60, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kobayashi, M.; Takezawa, S.; Hara, K.; Yu, R.T.; Umesono, Y.; Agata, K.; Taniwaki, M.; Yasuda, K.; Umesono, K. Identification of a photoreceptor cell-specific nuclear receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4814–4819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Mollema, N.; Haider, N.B. Focus on molecules: Nuclear hormone receptor Nr2e3: Impact on retinal development and disease. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 91, 116–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bumsted O’Brien, K.M.; Cheng, H.; Jiang, Y.; Schulte, D.; Swaroop, A.; Hendrickson, A.E. Expression of photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3 in rod photoreceptors of fetal human retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 2807–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cheng, H.; Khanna, H.; Oh, E.C.; Hicks, D.; Mitton, K.P.; Swaroop, A. Photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3 functions as a transcriptional activator in rod photoreceptors. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 1563–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, J.; Rattner, A.; Nathans, J. The rod photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor Nr2e3 represses transcription of multiple cone-specific genes. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Peng, G.H.; Ahmad, O.; Ahmad, F.; Liu, J.; Chen, S. The photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor Nr2e3 interacts with Crx and exerts opposing effects on the transcription of rod versus cone genes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 747–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Oh, E.C.; Cheng, H.; Hao, H.; Jia, L.; Khan, N.W.; Swaroop, A. Rod differentiation factor NRL activates the expression of nuclear receptor NR2E3 to suppress the development of cone photoreceptors. Brain Res. 2008, 1236, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Haider, N.B.; Mollema, N.; Gaule, M.; Yuan, Y.; Sachs, A.J.; Nystuen, A.M.; Naggert, J.K.; Nishina, P.M. Nr2e3-directed transcriptional regulation of genes involved in photoreceptor development and cell-type specific phototransduction. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 89, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cehajic-Kapetanovic, J.; Cottriall, C.L.; Jolly, J.K.; Shanks, M.; Clouston, P.; Charbel Issa, P.; MacLaren, R.E. Electrophysiological verification of enhanced S-cone syndrome caused by a novel c.755T>C NR2E3 missense variant. Ophthalmic Genet. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McCulloch, D.L.; Marmor, M.F.; Brigell, M.G.; Hamilton, R.; Holder, G.E.; Tzekov, R.; Bach, M. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc. Ophthalmol. Adv. Ophthalmol. 2015, 130, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shah, M.; Shanks, M.; Packham, E.; Williams, J.; Haysmoore, J.; MacLaren, R.E.; Nemeth, A.H.; Clouston, P.; Downes, S.M. Next generation sequencing using phenotype-based panels for genetic testing in inherited retinal diseases. Ophthalmic Genet. 2020, 41, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Adzhubei, I.A.; Schmidt, S.; Peshkin, L.; Ramensky, V.E.; Gerasimova, A.; Bork, P.; Kondrashov, A.S.; Sunyaev, S.R. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 248–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ng, P.C.; Henikoff, S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3812–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Schwarz, J.M.; Cooper, D.N.; Schuelke, M.; Seelow, D. MutationTaster2: Mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 361–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Murro, V.; Mucciolo, D.P.; Sodi, A.; Passerini, I.; Giorgio, D.; Virgili, G.; Rizzo, S. Novel clinical findings in autosomal recessive NR2E3-related retinal dystrophy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. Albrecht Graefes Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 257, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Akhmedov, N.B.; Piriev, N.I.; Chang, B.; Rapoport, A.L.; Hawes, N.L.; Nishina, P.M.; Nusinowitz, S.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Roderick, T.H.; Kozak, C.A.; et al. A deletion in a photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor mRNA causes retinal degeneration in the rd7 mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5551–5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xie, S.; Han, S.; Qu, Z.; Liu, F.; Li, J.; Yu, S.; Reilly, J.; Tu, J.; Liu, X.; Lu, Z.; et al. Knockout of Nr2e3 prevents rod photoreceptor differentiation and leads to selective L-/M-cone photoreceptor degeneration in zebrafish. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 1273–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sharon, D.; Sandberg, M.A.; Caruso, R.C.; Berson, E.L.; Dryja, T.P. Shared mutations in NR2E3 in enhanced S-cone syndrome, Goldmann-Favre syndrome, and many cases of clumped pigmentary retinal degeneration. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2003, 121, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kuniyoshi, K.; Hayashi, T.; Sakuramoto, H.; Nakao, A.; Sato, T.; Utsumi, T.; Tsuneoka, H.; Shimomura, Y. Novel mutations in enhanced S-cone syndrome. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 431.e1–431.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, S.P.; Hong, I.H.; Tsang, S.H.; Lee, W.; Horowitz, J.; Yzer, S.; Allikmets, R.; Chang, S. Disruption of the human cone photoreceptor mosaic from a defect in NR2E3 transcription factor function in young adults. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. Albrecht Graefes Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2013, 251, 2299–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iannaccone, A.; Fung, K.H.; Eyestone, M.E.; Stone, E.M. Treatment of adult-onset acute macular retinoschisis in enhanced s-cone syndrome with oral acetazolamide. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 147, 307–312.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Cassiman, C.; Spileers, W.; De Baere, E.; de Ravel, T.; Casteels, I. Peculiar fundus abnormalities and pathognomonic electrophysiological findings in a 14-month-old boy with NR2E3 mutations. Ophthalmic Genet. 2013, 34, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Escher, P.; Gouras, P.; Roduit, R.; Tiab, L.; Bolay, S.; Delarive, T.; Chen, S.; Tsai, C.C.; Hayashi, M.; Zernant, J.; et al. Mutations in NR2E3 can cause dominant or recessive retinal degenerations in the same family. Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bandah, D.; Merin, S.; Ashhab, M.; Banin, E.; Sharon, D. The spectrum of retinal diseases caused by NR2E3 mutations in Israeli and Palestinian patients. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009, 127, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Bernal, S.; Solans, T.; Gamundi, M.J.; Hernan, I.; de Jorge, L.; Carballo, M.; Navarro, R.; Tizzano, E.; Ayuso, C.; Baiget, M. Analysis of the involvement of the NR2E3 gene in autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies. Clin. Genet. 2008, 73, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bohrer, L.R.; Wiley, L.A.; Burnight, E.R.; Cooke, J.A.; Giacalone, J.C.; Anfinson, K.R.; Andorf, J.L.; Mullins, R.F.; Stone, E.M.; Tucker, B.A. Correction of NR2E3 Associated Enhanced S-cone Syndrome Patient-specific iPSCs using CRISPR-Cas9. Genes 2019, 10, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kanda, A.; Swaroop, A. A comprehensive analysis of sequence variants and putative disease-causing mutations in photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 2174–2184. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wright, A.F.; Reddick, A.C.; Schwartz, S.B.; Ferguson, J.S.; Aleman, T.S.; Kellner, U.; Jurklies, B.; Schuster, A.; Zrenner, E.; Wissinger, B.; et al. Mutation analysis of NR2E3 and NRL genes in Enhanced S Cone Syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2004, 24, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cruz, N.M.; Yuan, Y.; Leehy, B.D.; Baid, R.; Kompella, U.; DeAngelis, M.M.; Escher, P.; Haider, N.B. Modifier genes as therapeutics: The nuclear hormone receptor Rev Erb α (Nr1d1) rescues Nr2e3 associated retinal disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Li, S.; Datta, S.; Brabbit, E.; Love, Z.; Woytowicz, V.; Flattery, K.; Capri, J.; Yao, K.; Wu, S.; Imboden, M.; et al. Nr2e3 is a genetic modifier that rescues retinal degeneration and promotes homeostasis in multiple models of retinitis pigmentosa. Gene Ther. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Neveling, K.; Collin, R.W.; Gilissen, C.; van Huet, R.A.; Visser, L.; Kwint, M.P.; Gijsen, S.J.; Zonneveld, M.N.; Wieskamp, N.; de Ligt, J.; et al. Next-generation genetic testing for retinitis pigmentosa. Hum. Mutat. 2012, 33, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. de Carvalho, E.R.; Robson, A.G.; Arno, G.; Boon, C.; Webster, A.A.; Michaelides, M. Enhanced S-cone syndrome: Spectrum of clinical, imaging, electrophysiological and genetic findings in a retrospective case series of 56 patients. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lam, B.L.; Goldberg, J.L.; Hartley, K.L.; Stone, E.M.; Liu, M. Atypical mild enhanced S-cone syndrome with novel compound heterozygosity of the NR2E3 gene. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 144, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Beryozkin, A.; Zelinger, L.; Bandah-Rozenfeld, D.; Shevach, E.; Harel, A.; Storm, T.; Sagi, M.; Eli, D.; Merin, S.; Banin, E.; et al. Identification of mutations causing inherited retinal degenerations in the israeli and palestinian populations using homozygosity mapping. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. von Alpen, D.; Tran, H.V.; Guex, N.; Venturini, G.; Munier, F.L.; Schorderet, D.F.; Haider, N.B.; Escher, P. Differential dimerization of variants linked to enhanced S-cone sensitivity syndrome (ESCS) located in the NR2E3 ligand-binding domain. Hum. Mutat. 2015, 36, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Littink, K.W.; Stappers, P.T.Y.; Riemslag, F.C.C.; Talsma, H.E.; van Genderen, M.M.; Cremers, F.P.M.; Collin, R.W.J.; van den Born, L.I. Autosomal Recessive NRL Mutations in Patients with Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome. Genes 2018, 9, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Mahajan, D.; Votruba, M. A novel NR2E3 gene mutation in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa with cystic maculopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, e535–e536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Termuhlen, J.; Alex, A.F.; Glockle, N.; Kellner, U.; Fiedler, B.; Eter, N.; Uhlig, C.E. A new mutation in enhanced S-cone syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, e539–e540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ellingford, J.M.; Barton, S.; Bhaskar, S.; O’Sullivan, J.; Williams, S.G.; Lamb, J.A.; Panda, B.; Sergouniotis, P.I.; Gillespie, R.L.; Daiger, S.P.; et al. Molecular findings from 537 individuals with inherited retinal disease. J. Med Genet. 2016, 53, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Stone, E.M.; Andorf, J.L.; Whitmore, S.S.; DeLuca, A.P.; Giacalone, J.C.; Streb, L.M.; Braun, T.A.; Mullins, R.F.; Scheetz, T.E.; Sheffield, V.C.; et al. Clinically Focused Molecular Investigation of 1000 Consecutive Families with Inherited Retinal Disease. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, 1314–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lingao, M.D.; Ganesh, A.; Karthikeyan, A.S.; Al Zuhaibi, S.; Al-Hosni, A.; Al Khayat, A.; Capasso, J.; Trumler, A.A.; Stroh, E.; Al Shekaili, H.; et al. Macular cystoid spaces in patients with retinal dystrophy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2016, 37, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Dockery, A.; Stephenson, K.; Keegan, D.; Wynne, N.; Silvestri, G.; Humphries, P.; Kenna, P.F.; Carrigan, M.; Farrar, G.J. Target 5000: Target Capture Sequencing for Inherited Retinal Degenerations. Genes 2017, 8, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. van Huet, R.A.; Pierrache, L.H.; Meester-Smoor, M.A.; Klaver, C.C.; van den Born, L.I.; Hoyng, C.B.; de Wijs, I.J.; Collin, R.W.; Hoefsloot, L.H.; Klevering, B.J. The efficacy of microarray screening for autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa in routine clinical practice. Mol. Vis. 2015, 21, 461–476. [Google Scholar]
  64. Khan, A.O.; Aldahmesh, M.A.; Al-Harthi, E.; Alkuraya, F.S. Helicoid subretinal fibrosis associated with a novel recessive NR2E3 mutation p.S44X. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2010, 128, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kannabiran, C.; Singh, H.; Sahini, N.; Jalali, S.; Mohan, G. Mutations in TULP1, NR2E3, and MFRP genes in Indian families with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 1165–1174. [Google Scholar]
  66. Coppieters, F.; Leroy, B.P.; Beysen, D.; Hellemans, J.; De Bosscher, K.; Haegeman, G.; Robberecht, K.; Wuyts, W.; Coucke, P.J.; De Baere, E. Recurrent mutation in the first zinc finger of the orphan nuclear receptor NR2E3 causes autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gire, A.I.; Sullivan, L.S.; Bowne, S.J.; Birch, D.G.; Hughbanks-Wheaton, D.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Daiger, S.P. The Gly56Arg mutation in NR2E3 accounts for 1–2% of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Mol. Vis. 2007, 13, 1970–1975. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, L.J.; Chiang, S.W.; Tam, P.O.; Lai, T.Y.; Chan, C.K.; Wang, N.; Lam, D.S.; Pang, C.P. Association of NR2E3 but not NRL mutations with retinitis pigmentosa in the Chinese population. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 2229–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Audo, I.; Bujakowska, K.M.; Leveillard, T.; Mohand-Said, S.; Lancelot, M.E.; Germain, A.; Antonio, A.; Michiels, C.; Saraiva, J.P.; Letexier, M.; et al. Development and application of a next-generation-sequencing (NGS) approach to detect known and novel gene defects underlying retinal diseases. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2012, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Kawasaki, A.; Crippa, S.V.; Kardon, R.; Leon, L.; Hamel, C. Characterization of pupil responses to blue and red light stimuli in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa due to NR2E3 mutation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 5562–5569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Sullivan, L.S.; Bowne, S.J.; Reeves, M.J.; Blain, D.; Goetz, K.; Ndifor, V.; Vitez, S.; Wang, X.; Tumminia, S.J.; Daiger, S.P. Prevalence of mutations in eyeGENE probands with a diagnosis of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 6255–6261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Blanco-Kelly, F.; Garcia Hoyos, M.; Lopez Martinez, M.A.; Lopez-Molina, M.I.; Riveiro-Alvarez, R.; Fernandez-San Jose, P.; Avila-Fernandez, A.; Corton, M.; Millan, J.M.; Garcia Sandoval, B.; et al. Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa, p.Gly56Arg Mutation in NR2E3: Phenotype in a Large Cohort of 24 Cases. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Van Cauwenbergh, C.; Coppieters, F.; Roels, D.; De Jaegere, S.; Flipts, H.; De Zaeytijd, J.; Walraedt, S.; Claes, C.; Fransen, E.; Van Camp, G.; et al. Mutations in Splicing Factor Genes Are a Major Cause of Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa in Belgian Families. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Smirnov, V.M.; Dhaenens, C.M.; Vincent-Delorme, C.; Defoort-Dhellemmes, S. Triple hyperautofluorescent retinal ring. Pathognomonic appearance of c.166G>A NR2E3-related inherited retinal degeneration. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 2019, 42, 332–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Xu, Y.; Guan, L.; Shen, T.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, X.; Jiang, H.; Li, S.; Yang, J.; Jia, X.; Yin, Y.; et al. Mutations of 60 known causative genes in 157 families with retinitis pigmentosa based on exome sequencing. Hum. Genet. 2014, 133, 1255–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zerbib, J.; Blanco Garavito, R.; Gerber, S.; Oubraham, H.; Sikorav, A.; Audo, I.; Kaplan, J.; Rozet, J.M.; Souied, E.H. Retinochoroidal Anastomosis Associated with Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome. Retin. Cases Brief Rep. 2019, 13, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Maeda, A.; Yoshida, A.; Kawai, K.; Arai, Y.; Akiba, R.; Inaba, A.; Takagi, S.; Fujiki, R.; Hirami, Y.; Kurimoto, Y.; et al. Development of a molecular diagnostic test for Retinitis Pigmentosa in the Japanese population. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 62, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ge, Z.; Bowles, K.; Goetz, K.; Scholl, H.P.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.; Xu, S.; Wang, K.; Wang, H.; Chen, R. NGS-based Molecular diagnosis of 105 eyeGENE((R)) probands with Retinitis Pigmentosa. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Roorda, A.; Sundquist, S.; Solovyev, A.; Ratnam, K.; Lujan, B.J.; Stone, E.M.; Duncan, J.L. Adaptive Optics Imaging Reveals Supernormal Cone Density in Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 2934. [Google Scholar]
  80. Rocha-Sousa, A.; Hayashi, T.; Gomes, N.L.; Penas, S.; Brandao, E.; Rocha, P.; Urashima, M.; Yamada, H.; Tsuneoka, H.; Falcao-Reis, F. A novel mutation (Cys83Tyr) in the second zinc finger of NR2E3 in enhanced S-cone syndrome. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. Albrecht Graefes Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2011, 249, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hayashi, T.; Gekka, T.; Goto-Omoto, S.; Takeuchi, T.; Kubo, A.; Kitahara, K. Novel NR2E3 mutations (R104Q, R334G) associated with a mild form of enhanced S-cone syndrome demonstrate compound heterozygosity. Ophthalmology 2005, 112, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Carrigan, M.; Duignan, E.; Malone, C.P.; Stephenson, K.; Saad, T.; McDermott, C.; Green, A.; Keegan, D.; Humphries, P.; Kenna, P.F.; et al. Panel-Based Population Next-Generation Sequencing for Inherited Retinal Degenerations. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Minnella, A.M.; Pagliei, V.; Savastano, M.C.; Federici, M.; Bertelli, M.; Maltese, P.E.; Placidi, G.; Corbo, G.; Falsini, B.; Caporossi, A. Swept source optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography in pediatric enhanced S-cone syndrome: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2018, 12, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bocquet, B.; Marzouka, N.A.; Hebrard, M.; Manes, G.; Senechal, A.; Meunier, I.; Hamel, C.P. Homozygosity mapping in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa families detects novel mutations. Mol. Vis. 2013, 19, 2487–2500. [Google Scholar]
  85. Jinda, W.; Taylor, T.D.; Suzuki, Y.; Thongnoppakhun, W.; Limwongse, C.; Lertrit, P.; Suriyaphol, P.; Trinavarat, A.; Atchaneeyasakul, L.O. Whole exome sequencing in Thai patients with retinitis pigmentosa reveals novel mutations in six genes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 2259–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Patel, N.; Aldahmesh, M.A.; Alkuraya, H.; Anazi, S.; Alsharif, H.; Khan, A.O.; Sunker, A.; Al-Mohsen, S.; Abboud, E.B.; Nowilaty, S.R.; et al. Expanding the clinical, allelic, and locus heterogeneity of retinal dystrophies. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 2016, 18, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Eisenberger, T.; Neuhaus, C.; Khan, A.O.; Decker, C.; Preising, M.N.; Friedburg, C.; Bieg, A.; Gliem, M.; Charbel Issa, P.; Holz, F.G.; et al. Increasing the yield in targeted next-generation sequencing by implicating CNV analysis, non-coding exons and the overall variant load: The example of retinal dystrophies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Collin, R.W.; van den Born, L.I.; Klevering, B.J.; de Castro-Miro, M.; Littink, K.W.; Arimadyo, K.; Azam, M.; Yazar, V.; Zonneveld, M.N.; Paun, C.C.; et al. High-resolution homozygosity mapping is a powerful tool to detect novel mutations causative of autosomal recessive RP in the Dutch population. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 2227–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Gerber, S.; Rozet, J.M.; Takezawa, S.I.; dos Santos, L.C.; Lopes, L.; Gribouval, O.; Penet, C.; Perrault, I.; Ducroq, D.; Souied, E.; et al. The photoreceptor cell-specific nuclear receptor gene (PNR) accounts for retinitis pigmentosa in the Crypto-Jews from Portugal (Marranos), survivors from the Spanish Inquisition. Hum. Genet. 2000, 107, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, N.K.; Fine, H.F.; Chang, S.; Chou, C.L.; Cella, W.; Tosi, J.; Lin, C.S.; Nagasaki, T.; Tsang, S.H. Cellular origin of fundus autofluorescence in patients and mice with a defective NR2E3 gene. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 93, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Habibi, I.; Chebil, A.; Falfoul, Y.; Allaman-Pillet, N.; Kort, F.; Schorderet, D.F.; El Matri, L. Identifying mutations in Tunisian families with retinal dystrophy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Neuhaus, C.; Eisenberger, T.; Decker, C.; Nagl, S.; Blank, C.; Pfister, M.; Kennerknecht, I.; Muller-Hofstede, C.; Charbel Issa, P.; Heller, R.; et al. Next-generation sequencing reveals the mutational landscape of clinically diagnosed Usher syndrome: Copy number variations, phenocopies, a predominant target for translational read-through, and PEX26 mutated in Heimler syndrome. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2017, 5, 531–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Abu-Safieh, L.; Alrashed, M.; Anazi, S.; Alkuraya, H.; Khan, A.O.; Al-Owain, M.; Al-Zahrani, J.; Al-Abdi, L.; Hashem, M.; Al-Tarimi, S.; et al. Autozygome-guided exome sequencing in retinal dystrophy patients reveals pathogenetic mutations and novel candidate disease genes. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Bravo-Gil, N.; Mendez-Vidal, C.; Romero-Perez, L.; Gonzalez-del Pozo, M.; Rodriguez-de la Rua, E.; Dopazo, J.; Borrego, S.; Antinolo, G. Improving the management of Inherited Retinal Dystrophies by targeted sequencing of a population-specific gene panel. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ripamonti, C.; Aboshiha, J.; Henning, G.B.; Sergouniotis, P.I.; Michaelides, M.; Moore, A.T.; Webster, A.R.; Stockman, A. Vision in observers with enhanced S-cone syndrome: An excess of s-cones but connected mainly to conventional s-cone pathways. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 963–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Siemiatkowska, A.M.; Arimadyo, K.; Moruz, L.M.; Astuti, G.D.; de Castro-Miro, M.; Zonneveld, M.N.; Strom, T.M.; de Wijs, I.J.; Hoefsloot, L.H.; Faradz, S.M.; et al. Molecular genetic analysis of retinitis pigmentosa in Indonesia using genome-wide homozygosity mapping. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 3013–3024. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Manayath, G.J.; Namburi, P.; Periasamy, S.; Kale, J.A.; Narendran, V.; Ganesh, A. A novel mutation in the NR2E3 gene associated with Goldmann-Favre syndrome and vasoproliferative tumor of the retina. Mol. Vis. 2014, 20, 724–731. [Google Scholar]
Genes 11 01288 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of NR2E3 genomic locus, structure of the encoded protein and location of identified mutations. The top panel shows the NR2E3 gene on 15q23 which consists of 8 exons and spans approximately 7.7 kb of genomic DNA. Exons are shown as boxes and introns as lines; all are to scale. The middle panel shows which domains each exon contributes to the protein structure. The gene encodes a predicted 410 amino acid protein which shows the characteristic structure of a nuclear hormone receptor (lower panel) and consists of 5 domains: the N-terminal A/B domain (regions 1 and 2, shown in dark blue), a DNA binding domain (light grey) which contains 2 Zn-fingers (region 3, dark grey), a hinge region (region 4, green) and the ligand binding domain at the C-terminal end (region 5, light blue). The position of the β-sheets, α-helices and the activator function region 2 are also shown (in red, blue and darker blue, respectively). The positions of the mutations described in this report are also shown. Figure adapted from Mollena et al. [22].
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of NR2E3 genomic locus, structure of the encoded protein and location of identified mutations. The top panel shows the NR2E3 gene on 15q23 which consists of 8 exons and spans approximately 7.7 kb of genomic DNA. Exons are shown as boxes and introns as lines; all are to scale. The middle panel shows which domains each exon contributes to the protein structure. The gene encodes a predicted 410 amino acid protein which shows the characteristic structure of a nuclear hormone receptor (lower panel) and consists of 5 domains: the N-terminal A/B domain (regions 1 and 2, shown in dark blue), a DNA binding domain (light grey) which contains 2 Zn-fingers (region 3, dark grey), a hinge region (region 4, green) and the ligand binding domain at the C-terminal end (region 5, light blue). The position of the β-sheets, α-helices and the activator function region 2 are also shown (in red, blue and darker blue, respectively). The positions of the mutations described in this report are also shown. Figure adapted from Mollena et al. [22].
Genes 11 01288 g001
Genes 11 01288 g002 550
Figure 2. Family trees and colour imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging of patients I, II and III. The top panel shows the pedigrees of each family, the arrow indicates the proband. (A) Imaging of Patient I showing a dense concentric band of pigment and atrophy, extending from the arcades into the mid peripheral retina (i,ii); increased autofluorescence signal at both maculae (iii,iv), and central preservation of the retina on optical coherence tomography (v,vi). (B) Imaging of Patient II showing concentric pigment clumping in the mid peripheral retina that is more pronounced in the temporal and nasal regions (i,ii); mildly increased AF at both maculae and decreased AF extending from the vascular arcades into the midperiphery (iii,iv); significant focal thickening at the fovea in the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and, in the right eye, an incipient lamellar hole (v,vi). (C) Imaging of patient III shows a concentric band of atrophy, pigment, and white dots extending from the arcades into the mid peripheral retina (i,ii); with an increased autofluorescence signal at both maculae (iii,iv), and central preservation of the retina on optical coherence tomography (v,vi). (vii–viii) in each panel are OCT images with segmentation highlighting the ganglion cell layer in purple and the inner plexiform layer in blue (see Supplementary Table S2 for measurements).
Figure 2. Family trees and colour imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging of patients I, II and III. The top panel shows the pedigrees of each family, the arrow indicates the proband. (A) Imaging of Patient I showing a dense concentric band of pigment and atrophy, extending from the arcades into the mid peripheral retina (i,ii); increased autofluorescence signal at both maculae (iii,iv), and central preservation of the retina on optical coherence tomography (v,vi). (B) Imaging of Patient II showing concentric pigment clumping in the mid peripheral retina that is more pronounced in the temporal and nasal regions (i,ii); mildly increased AF at both maculae and decreased AF extending from the vascular arcades into the midperiphery (iii,iv); significant focal thickening at the fovea in the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and, in the right eye, an incipient lamellar hole (v,vi). (C) Imaging of patient III shows a concentric band of atrophy, pigment, and white dots extending from the arcades into the mid peripheral retina (i,ii); with an increased autofluorescence signal at both maculae (iii,iv), and central preservation of the retina on optical coherence tomography (v,vi). (vii–viii) in each panel are OCT images with segmentation highlighting the ganglion cell layer in purple and the inner plexiform layer in blue (see Supplementary Table S2 for measurements).
Genes 11 01288 g002
Genes 11 01288 g003 550
Figure 3. Electrophysiology results for patients compared to a control eye. Patient 1 has widespread loss in all systems with residual S-cone response. Patient 2 has extinguished rod, reduced cone but large S-cone responses. Patient 3 has reduced responses affecting rods more than cones. DA 0.01 is the dark-adapted rod response, and DA 10 is the dark adapted maximal response. At DA 10, both the single flash response and oscillatory potentials are shown. LA 30 Hz is light adapted 30 Hz flicker response and LA 3 is the light adapted standard flash as per International Society of Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) guidelines. The S-cone response isolates the S-cone response using a blue flash. The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) reflects macular function.
Figure 3. Electrophysiology results for patients compared to a control eye. Patient 1 has widespread loss in all systems with residual S-cone response. Patient 2 has extinguished rod, reduced cone but large S-cone responses. Patient 3 has reduced responses affecting rods more than cones. DA 0.01 is the dark-adapted rod response, and DA 10 is the dark adapted maximal response. At DA 10, both the single flash response and oscillatory potentials are shown. LA 30 Hz is light adapted 30 Hz flicker response and LA 3 is the light adapted standard flash as per International Society of Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) guidelines. The S-cone response isolates the S-cone response using a blue flash. The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) reflects macular function.
Genes 11 01288 g003
Table
Table 1. Summary of NR2E3 variants identified.
Table 1. Summary of NR2E3 variants identified.
PatientVariantProteinGenotypePositionLocationgnomAD
MAF		PolyPhen2SIFTOriginal Reference
Ic.226C > Tp.R76WHetExon 2chr15: 721039300DD[1]
c.1048C > Gp.Q350EHetExon 7chr15: 721064060DDNovel
IIc.119-2A > CSplicingHomIntron 1chr15: 721038210.0005n/an/a[1]
IIIc.119-2A > CSplicingHetIntron 1chr15: 721038210.0005n/an/a[1]
c.639_640insTp.P214SfsX39HetExon 5chr15: 721047440.000004n/an/aNovel
Chromosome position is based on build GRCh37/hg19; nucleotide and protein numbering is based on NR2E3 transcript NM_014249.3; Genome Aggregation Database, gnomAD; MAF, minor allele frequency; gnomAD, Polyphen, and SIFT were accessed on 1 September 2019. Polyphen predictions range from zero to one and variants are appraised qualitatively as benign (B) (0.00–0.15), possibly damaging (P) (0.16–0.85), or probably damaging (D) (0.86–1.00). SIFT results are reported to be tolerant (T) if tolerance index > 0.05 or intolerant (damaging (D)) if tolerance ≤0.05. Novel variants identified in this study are shaded.
Table
Table 2. Clinical information.
Table 2. Clinical information.
PatientGenderEthnic OriginFirst Symptoms (and Age at Diagnosis)Age of Last Examination (Years)Symptoms at Last Review & Presence of Cataract Best Corrected VAFundusOCTAutofluorescenceVisual FieldERGVariant
IMNepaleseNight blindness since childhood diagnosed
(20)		66Nyctalopia, blurred central vision, photopsia
Cataract bilateral: posterior subcapsular		6/18 RE
6/24 LE		Ring of dense pigment with atrophy surrounding and including the arcades extending to the mid periphery; sparing maculae and peripheral retinasCentral preservation of the retina with loss of the EZ temporal to macula, vitreomacular traction OD
Thickened EZ/IZ		Annulus of decreased signal consistent with coalescing atrophy extending from and including the arcades to the mid-periphery and increased signal disturbance within both maculaeSeverely constricted field to all isopters 12e below threshold in both eyes
<5 degrees		Severe widespread rod, cone, macular and RPE dysfunction with residual S cone responsec.226C>T
c.1048C>G
IIFWhite CaucasianNight blindness (lifelong)
(40)		69Abnormal colour vision, poor contrast, mild photosensitivity
Cataracts bilateral		6/36+1 RE
6/36 LE		Clumped pigmentary deposition extending from, and including the vascular arcades into the mid periphery, with far peripheral atrophyDisrupted fovea, with thickened EZ and IZIncreased AF at the maculae and at the arcades with decreased patchy AF in the areas of atrophy in the mid peripheryPartial ring scotoma to V4e stimulus with infratemporal sparing, central scotoma to III.4e in both eyesPERG was almost extinguished. Both rods and cones were grossly affected, with a similarly reduced and delayed response to standard flash under both scotopic and photopic conditions
The 30Hz flicker was markedly abnormal in the presence of a large S cone response.		c.119-2A>C
Hom
IIIFWhite CaucasianNyctalopia, photophobia and photopsias
(10)		16Nyctalopia, photophobia, photopsias
Cataract: no		6/5 RE
6/6 LE		Band of atrophy and white punctate dots in mid-peripheral retina circumferential to the maculaCentral preservation of the retinaIncreased AF at both maculae with a brighter ring internal to arcades, patchy reduction in signal mapping to the atrophic patchesRing scotoma to 1.4e stimulus with central 10 degree island. Preserved fields bilaterally to large targetsRelatively well preserved PERG
Extinguished rod-specific dim flash responses and reduced and delayed responses to standard flash under both photopic and scotopic conditions.
The response to the 30 Hz flicker stimulus was abnormal.		c.119-2A>C
c.639_640insT
AF, autofluorescence; ERG, electroretinogram; EOG, electrooculogram; EZ, ellipsoid zone; IZ, interdigitation zone; LE, left eye; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PERG, pattern electroretinogram; RE, right eye; VA, visual acuity.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-khuzaei, S.; Broadgate, S.; Halford, S.; Jolly, J.K.; Shanks, M.; Clouston, P.; Downes, S.M. Novel Pathogenic Sequence Variants in NR2E3 and Clinical Findings in Three Patients. Genes 2020, 11, 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111288

AMA Style

Al-khuzaei S, Broadgate S, Halford S, Jolly JK, Shanks M, Clouston P, Downes SM. Novel Pathogenic Sequence Variants in NR2E3 and Clinical Findings in Three Patients. Genes. 2020; 11(11):1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-khuzaei, Saoud, Suzanne Broadgate, Stephanie Halford, Jasleen K. Jolly, Morag Shanks, Penny Clouston, and Susan M. Downes. 2020. "Novel Pathogenic Sequence Variants in NR2E3 and Clinical Findings in Three Patients" Genes 11, no. 11: 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111288

APA Style

Al-khuzaei, S., Broadgate, S., Halford, S., Jolly, J. K., Shanks, M., Clouston, P., & Downes, S. M. (2020). Novel Pathogenic Sequence Variants in NR2E3 and Clinical Findings in Three Patients. Genes, 11(11), 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop