Next Article in Journal
Genetical Genomics of Tonic Immobility in the Chicken
Previous Article in Journal
Biodegradation of Tetralin: Genomics, Gene Function and Regulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global Regulator PhoP is Necessary for Motility, Biofilm Formation, Exoenzyme Production, and Virulence of Xanthomonas citri Subsp. citri on Citrus Plants

1
College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Guangzhou Airport Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Guangzhou 510800, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2019, 10(5), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050340
Submission received: 3 April 2019 / Revised: 28 April 2019 / Accepted: 2 May 2019 / Published: 6 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Citrus canker caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri is one of the most important bacterial diseases of citrus, impacting both plant growth and fruit quality. Identifying and elucidating the roles of genes associated with pathogenesis has aided our understanding of the molecular basis of citrus-bacteria interactions. However, the complex virulence mechanisms of X. citri subsp. citri are still not well understood. In this study, we characterized the role of PhoP in X. citri subsp. citri using a phoP deletion mutant, ΔphoP. Compared with wild-type strain XHG3, ΔphoP showed reduced motility, biofilm formation, as well as decreased production of cellulase, amylase, and polygalacturonase. In addition, the virulence of ΔphoP on citrus leaves was significantly decreased. To further understand the virulence mechanisms of X. citri subsp. citri, high-throughput RNA sequencing technology (RNA-Seq) was used to compare the transcriptomes of the wild-type and mutant strains. Analysis revealed 1017 differentially-expressed genes (DEGs), of which 614 were up-regulated and 403 were down-regulated in ΔphoP. Gene ontology functional enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses suggested that the DEGs were enriched in flagellar assembly, two-component systems, histidine metabolism, bacterial chemotaxis, ABC transporters, and bacterial secretion systems. Our results showed that PhoP activates the expression of a large set of virulence genes, including 22 type III secretion system genes and 15 type III secretion system effector genes, as well as several genes involved in chemotaxis, and flagellar and histidine biosynthesis. Two-step reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis targeting 17 genes was used to validate the RNA-seq data, and confirmed that the expression of all 17 genes, except for that of virB1, decreased significantly. Our results suggest that PhoP interacts with a global signaling network to co-ordinate the expression of multiple virulence factors involved in modification and adaption to the host environment during infection.

1. Introduction

Citrus crop canker, caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and generally associated with a characteristic embossment of necrotic lesions on infected leaves, stems, and fruit [1,2], is considered one of the most serious crop diseases worldwide [3]. Citrus yields and quality are greatly impaired by citrus canker because of defoliation, blemished fruit, and in serious cases, premature fruit drop [4]. X. citri subsp. citri invasion of the citrus host occurs directly through natural openings, including stomata, or wounds, with the bacteria then acquiring nutrients from host cells and proliferating in the apoplast [4]. X. citri subsp. citri is an important model Xanthomonas pathogen and is used in studies investigating plant-microbe interactions and virulence mechanisms. The pathogen has evolved several strategies, including a type III secretion system (T3SS), extracellular enzymes, and polysaccharides, to adapt to and successfully establish an in planta niche, conquering plant defenses and creating a favorable environment for growth [5,6]. Previous studies have characterized the major pathogenicity and virulence genes responsible for secretion systems such as the T3SS components and effector molecules, as well as bacterial adhesins, extracellular enzymes, toxins, surface structural elements, and rpf (regulation of pathogenicity factors)-encoded cell-cell signaling proteins [7,8,9,10,11,12]. PthA, an effector of the T3SS, is a critical factor for citrus canker symptoms [13], while GalU, a UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase, contributes to the growth of X. citri subsp. citri in intercellular spaces and is involved in the synthesis of extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), as well as in biofilm formation [14]. Genome sequencing of X. citri subsp. citri has greatly increased our understanding of X. citri subsp. citri-citrus plant interaction [7,15].
Bacterial two-component regulatory systems (TCS) regulate a wide gamut of biological processes in response to fluctuating environmental stimuli. However, only a few X. citri subsp. citri TCS have been investigated for their contributions to virulence. For example, the HrpG/HrpX TCS of X. citri subsp. citri interacts with a global signaling network to co-ordinate the expression of multiple virulence factors required for the modification of and adaption to the host environment during infection [8]. The ColR/ColS system is also critical for X. citri subsp. citri virulence, contributing to growth in planta, biofilm formation, LPS production, catalase activity, and resistance to environmental stress [6]. PhoQ/PhoP, which modulates adaptive responses to changes in levels of divalent cations, including magnesium, in the environment [16,17], is an evolutionarily active system involved in bacterial adaptation to various ecological niches [18]. In animal-pathogenic bacterium Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium, antimicrobial peptides serve as direct signals for the activation of PhoQ [19], while regulatory protein PhoP controls susceptibility to the host inflammatory response in Shigella flexneri [20]. PhoP also controls virulence in Yersinia pestis, the etiological agent of plague, with a Y. pestis phoP mutant showing decreased survival within macrophages and increased sensitivity to low pH, oxidative killing, and high osmolarity [21].
In plant-pathogenic bacteria, the PhoQ/PhoP system has been implicated in the regulation of several virulence determinants in Dickeya dadantii (formerly known as Erwinia chrysanthemi), a pectinolytic enterobacterium causing soft rot in several plant species [22], and is required for hrpG expression, the stress defense response, cation transportation, and virulence in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae AvrXa21 [23,24]. The expression of the set of genes activated by PhoP varies among different bacterial species [25,26]. Comparison of the downstream genes regulated by PhoP in S. Typhimurium and in Escherichia coli showed that gene expression was very different between the two species [27]. In X. campestris pv. campestris, PhoP controls the transcription of many essential, structural genes by directly binding to their cis-regulatory elements. However, it does not control the same essential genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as no PhoP binding sites exist in the promoter regions of the genes [18]. A comparative analysis of the genomes of P. aeruginosa, X. campestris pv. campestris and X. oryzae pv. oryzae found that only five genes with expression putatively regulated by PhoP were shared among the three species. Although the PhoP amino acid sequences from X. campestris pv. campestris and X. oryzae pv. oryzae were identical, approximately 70% of the PhoP-binding sequences differed between the two bacteria, indicating that the effects and regulatory mechanisms of PhoQ/PhoP may differ amongst pathogenic bacteria, even those belonging to the same genus.
Despite the information available on other species, the function of PhoP in X. citri subsp. citri remains unclear. Therefore, as well as analyzing PhoP-regulated gene expression in X. citri subsp. citri, we examined the role of PhoP with respect to virulence in citrus to provide new information about the virulence of this important plant pathogen.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Culture Media, and Growth Conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Wild type strain XHG3 was isolated from citrus cultivar of Xinhugang in Guangdong province of China. This strain has a high virulence on citrus plants and is preserved in Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control. Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri was routinely grown at 28 °C in YEB medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5g/L NaCl, 0.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 5g/L sucrose, pH7.0) or NA (5 g/L tryptone, 10 g/L sucrose, 1 g/L yeast extract, 3 g/L beef extract, 15 g/L agar, pH7.0). Transformants bearing the first crossover for the gene knockout were cultured on NA without 10% sucrose medium. Transformants for the second crossover were plated on NA medium. E. coli was grown at 37 °C in LB medium (10 g/L Bacto tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, and 10 g/L NaCl, pH7.0). NYGA medium (5 g/L tryptone, 3 g/L yeast extract, 20 mL/L glycerol, 15 g/L agar, pH7.0) was used for enzyme assays. Antibiotics were added at the following final concentrations when required: streptomycin sulphate (Sm), 50 μg∙mL−1; kanamycin (Km), 50 μg·mL−1; Ampicillin (Amp), 100 μg∙mL−1. The optical density of the cultures at 600 nm (OD600) was measured by using a UNIC 7200 spectrophotometer (UNIC Apparatus Co). All antibiotics were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.2. Biochemical Reagents, Primers and Other Materials

Primer STARTM HS DNA Polymerase, Taq DNA Polymerase, T4 DNA Ligase, a Star Prep Plasmid Miniprep Kit, a Universal DNA Purification Kit, a DNA Fragment Purification Kit, PrimeScriptTM RT Master Mix (for Real Time PCR) and SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (Tli RNaseH Plus), as well as restriction enzymes SpeI, BamHI, HindIII, EcoRI, and D2000 DNA Ladder Marker, were purchased from TaKaRa Bio. A SV Total RNA Isolation System was purchased from Promega. All primer synthesis and sequencing was performed by Invitrogen. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Susceptible cultivars of Citrus reticulata, commonly known as Xinhuigan and Orah were maintained in a greenhouse.

2.3. Gene Knockout and Complementation of phoP Gene

A phoP deletion mutant was generated from wild-type X. citri subsp. citri strain XHG3 using homologous recombination [28]. All primers used in the generation of the mutants are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The left and right homologous arms of phoP were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA from XHG3 as a template and primer pairs phoP-U-F/phoP-U-R and phoP-D-F/phoP-D-R, respectively. The two amplified fragments, which flank phoP, were fused together by PCR using primers phoP-U-F/phoP-D-R. Following digestion with SpeI and BamHI, the fusion fragment was purified and ligated into suicide vector pKNG101 to obtain recombinant plasmid pKNG-ΔphoP. pKNG-ΔphoP was then transformed into wild-type strain XHG3 by electroporation, and transformants were selected for on NAN agar medium supplemented with Sm (50 μg/mL). Sucrose-sensitive clones were grown in the absence of antibiotics, and double recombination events were selected for on NAS agar plates supplemented with 10% sucrose. The resulting ΔphoP mutant was confirmed by PCR and sequencing.
For complementation of the ΔphoP mutant, a 684-bp fragment containing the entire gene of phoP was amplified from XHG3 genomic DNA using primers phoP-F/phoP-R. The resulting amplicon was digested with BamHI and HindIII and then cloned into the corresponding sites of plasmid vector PBBR1MCS4 so that expression of the target gene was under the control of the lac promoter present in the vector. The ligated mixture was transfected into E. coli DH5α competent cells, and transformants were selected on LB agar supplemented with 100 μg∙mL−1 of Amp. Following PCR-based verification using primers MCS4-F/R, the recombinant plasmid was transformed into ΔphoP by electroporation to produce the complemented strain, R-phoP.

2.4. Bacterial Growth Curve

To examine the growth of bacterial strains, cells from overnight cultures of the tested strains were harvested and were inoculated into fresh YEB broth. The strains were then cultured at 30 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. Every 2 h, 2-mL volumes of each culture were collected to measure the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Three replicates were performed for each strain, and bacterial growth curves were plotted based on the average values.

2.5. Motility and Biofilm-Formation Assay

Motility assays were performed as described by [29] with modification. Briefly, bacterial strains were cultured in NB medium overnight to an OD600 = 0.5. Aliquots (2 μL) of the bacterial suspensions were then inoculated onto the surface of agar plates (10 g tryptone, 5 g NaCl, and 3.0 g agar per liter) and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C, Motility was then assessed by measuring the diameter of the growth circle around the inoculation site. Each assay was repeated three times, and strains were examined in triplicate.
The ability of the strains to form a biofilm was examined as described by [6] with modification. Briefly, a 10-μL aliquot of bacterial cell culture (OD600 = 0.5) was inoculated into tubes containing SONG medium (20 g/L of tryptone, 5 g/L of yeast extract, 5 g/L of NaCl, 2.4 g/L of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.186 g/L of KCl, 50 ml/L of 40% glycerin) and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C. The culture medium was then discarded, and attached bacterial cells were gently washed three times with distilled water, incubated for 20 min at 60 °C, and then stained with 1.5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet for 45 min. The unbound crystal violet was discarded, and the wells were washed with water prior to interpretation.

2.6. Determination of Extracellular Enzymes Activity

Bacterial protease, amylase and cellulase activities were measured using protease, polygalacturonase (PG) and cellulase test plates, respectively, as described by [30]. Relative levels of exoenzyme production were assessed by radial diffusion assays. Bacterial strains were grown in YEB at 28 °C overnight, and the supernatants were collected by centrifugation. Thirty microliters aliquots of the filter-sterilized supernatant were added to the wells of the exoenzyme test plates for further cultivation at 28 °C for 24 h. Each assay was repeated three times, with each strain examined in triplicate. Enzyme activity was estimated from the diameter of the zones surrounding the culture supernatants of each strain.

2.7. Pathogenicity Assay

Pathogenicity assays were conducted in a quarantine greenhouse facility. Bacterial strains were cultured in YEB for 24 h at 28 °C. The cells were then pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in sterile water to an OD600 = 0.01. The bacterial suspensions were then inoculated onto the tender leaves of cultivars of Xinhuigan and Orah using needleless syringes [31]. Sterile water was used as a control. The inoculated plants were maintained in the greenhouse at 30 °C, and symptoms were observed for three days following inoculation.

2.8. High-throughput RNA Sequencing (RNA-seq) and Data Analysis

Wild-type strain XHG3 and the ΔphoP mutant were cultured in YEB medium at 28 °C to OD600 = 1.0, with two biological repeats performed for each strain. Total bacterial RNA was extracted using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega), with eluted RNA then DNase-treated using a Turbo DNA-free Kit (Promega) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and quantity of the total RNA was assessed using agarose gel electrophoresis, spectrophotometry, and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Transcriptome library construction and sequencing were performed by Novogene (Beijing, China). Clean read data were obtained following sequencing and data filtering, and resulting reads were mapped to the X. citri subsp. citri strain 306 reference genome. Gene expression, as indicated by the expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per million base pairs sequenced (FPKM), was calculated using HTSeq, with difference in expression between strains ΔphoP and XHG3 determined using DESeq.
Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were designated based on q-values < 0.005 and a minimum absolute |log2(Fold Change)| > 1, and were exported as a tabular file (Supplementary Table S2). DEGs were then classified and enriched based on gene ontology (GO) database (http://www.geneontology.org/ and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses.

2.9. Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

To verify the RNA-seq results and identify the downstream genes regulated by PhoP, the expression of several genes was examined using qRT-PCR analysis. RNA samples were reverse-transcribed using a PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa). Gene-specific primers were designed using DNASTAR software (DNASTAR) to generate 100–250 bp products from the X. citri subsp. citri genome (Supplementary Table S1). qRT-PCR analysis was performed using three biological replicates on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR System using TaKaRa SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The 16S rRNA gene was used as an endogenous control to normalize gene expression data. Target genes included hrpG and hrpX (T3SS regulators), avrBs2 and avrXacE1 (avirulence protein), and egl0028 (cellulase). The relative fold change in gene expression was calculated using the formula 2-ΔΔCT [32]. Fold change values were log2 transformed to allow comparison with values generated from RNA-seq analysis.

3. Results

Mutation of phoP does not affect the bacterial growth. To examine the function of PhoP in X. citri subsp. citri, we successfully constructed phoP knockout mutant ΔphoP, along with its complementation strain R-phoP (Supplementary Figure S1). To determine whether mutation of phoP affects the growth and proliferation of X. citri subsp. citri, the growth of the wild-type, mutant, and complementation strains was compared in YEB medium. Compared with the wild-type, ΔphoP had a slower growth rate between 4 and 16 h post-inoculation, but reached a cell density similar to that of the wild-type by 20 h post-inoculation (Figure 1). At 24 h post-inoculation, there were no obvious differences in the growth of the three strains.
Mutation of phoP reduces motility and biofilm formation in X. citri subsp. citri. Motility assays demonstrated that following incubation at 28 °C for 72 h, the ΔphoP mutant showed considerably reduced motility compared with wild-type strain XHG3 (Figure 2A), with a 70.6% reduction in colony diameter compared with that of strain XHG3 (Figure 2B). The motility of complemented mutant strain R-phoP was comparable with that of the wild-type, suggesting that PhoP positively regulates bacterial motility.
Biofilms are bacterial communities that are attached to a surface so as to provide protection from deleterious conditions [33,34]. ΔphoP showed a significant decrease in biofilm formation in glass tubes compared with wide-type strain XHG3 and the complementation strain R-phoP (Figure 3), indicating that PhoP regulates biofilm formation in X. citri subsp. citri.
Mutation of phoP reduces the production of polygalacturonase, amylase and cellulase in X. citri subsp. citri. In many plant pathogenic bacteria, extracellular enzymes, including protease, polygalacturonase (PG), cellulase and amylase, are important virulence factors. To investigate the role of PhoP in X. citri subsp. citri extracellular enzyme production, we compared the levels of the different exoenzymes in ΔphoP and wild type strain XHG3. The results showed a 100% reduction in PG activity (Figure 4B,E), a 37.16% reduction in amylase production (Figure 4C,E), and a 19.05% reduction in cellulase activity (Figure 4D,E), in the ΔphoP mutant compared with wild-type strain XHG3. The activities of each of the enzymes were restored to wild-type levels in complementation mutant strain R-phoP. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in protease production between ΔphoP and XHG3 (Figure 4A,E). These results confirm that PhoP is involved in the production of polygalacturonase, amylase and cellulase, in X. citri subsp. citri, but does not appear to regulate protease production.
PhoP is required for the virulence of X. citri subsp. citri on citrus plants. The tested bacterial suspensions were inoculated onto the young leaves of two citrus cultivars (Xinhuigang and Orah), which were then maintained in the greenhouse at 30 °C. At 3 days post-inoculation, the leaves inoculated with wild-type strain XHG3 showed obvious canker symptoms, while only very mild symptoms were observed on leaves inoculated with ΔphoP (Figure 5). Canker symptoms similar to those induced by the wild-type strain were observed on leaves inoculated with the complemented mutant strain, suggesting that PhoP is required for the virulence of X. citri subsp. citri.
Analysis of RNA-seq data. To clarify differences in gene expression between XHG3 and ΔphoP, transcriptome sequencing was performed. Total RNA integrity was detected by using an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer, and the degradation and contamination of RNA were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Supplementary Figure S2). RNA purity was determined by Nanodrop spectrophotomete (OD260/280 ratio). All RNA evaluations meet the quality requirements for sequencing (Supplementary Figure S2).
Sequencing reads were mapped against the reference genome. The XHG3 sample resulted in a total of 19,945,236 reads, with a total of 24,370,669 reads obtained for ΔphoP sample, indicating good data output quality (Supplementary Table S2).
In this study, a false discovery rate of 0.05, a (|log2(FoldChange)| > 1, and a q value < 0.005 were used as the cut-off for differential gene expression. There was a total of 1017 DGEs between ΔphoP and XHG3, among which 614 were up-regulated and 403 were down-regulated (Supplementary Table S3). Using a stringent P-value of > 0.005, 287 genes showing differential expression between XHG3 and ΔphoP were identified and then classified and enriched based on the GO database (http://www.geneontology.org/). The DEGs were significantly enriched in 20 GO terms (corrected_P-value < 0.1) involved in cell motility, localization of cell, flagellar motility, cellular components, bacterial-type flagellum and motor activity (Figure 6).
KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) analysis assigned pathways for 2733 genes, of which 481 showed significant differences in expression. These genes were significantly enriched (P < 0.05) in six signaling pathways, including flagellar assembly, two-component system, histidine metabolism, bacterial chemotaxis, ABC transporters, and bacterial secretion system (Supplementary Table S4).
PhoP regulates the expression of T3SS-associated genes in X. citri subsp. citri. Transcriptome analysis revealed that the complete T3SS-encoding hrp gene cluster, which contains 24 genes (Xac0393 to Xac0417), including hrpF, hpaB, hrpE, hrpD6, hrpD5, hpaA, hrcS, hrcR, hrcQ, hrcV, hrcU, hrpB1, hrpB2, hrcJ, hrpB4, hrpB5, hrcN, hrpB7, hrcT, hrcC and hpa1, was down-regulated (expect for Xac 0393 and Xac 0417), in ΔphoP compared with the wild-type strain (Table 2). Among 24 putative and known T3SS effectors in the X. citri subsp. citri genome [15], 15 effector genes, including AvrBs2, HrpW (PopW), XopAD, XopAI, XopAK, XopE1, XopE3, XopI, XopK, XopN, XopQ, XopR, XopX, XopZ, were down-regulated in ΔphoP (Table 3). These results suggested that PhoP positively regulates the expression of T3SS-associated genes.
PhoP regulates the expression of most T4SS genes. The genome of X. citri subsp. citri contains two T4SS clusters, one in the chromosome and the other on a plasmid [7]. We observed an increase in the expression of more than 10 genes (virB4, virB1, virB11, virB10, virB8, virD4, XAC0096, XAC1918, XAC2609, XAC2610, phlA, XAC0323, HI and Cw1L) coding for components of the T4SS or T4SS-interacting proteins [15] in the ΔphoP mutant (Table 4), indicating that PhoP negatively regulates theT4SS.
PhoP positively regulates the expression of chemotaxis and flagella genes in X. citri subsp. citri. A number of genes involved in motility and chemotaxis were regulated at a transcriptional level in the ΔphoP mutant. Twenty-five genes involved in flagellar assembly were distinctly down-regulated in the ΔphoP mutant compared with the wild-type, including fliACEFGILMNPR, flhABF, and flgBCDEFGHIJKL, all of which had log2.Fold_change values between −1.7 and −4.30. In addition, of the 17 bacterial chemotaxis genes, 16 of them showed decreased expression in the ΔphoP, including cheW, cheA, cheY, and cheZ (Table 5).
PhoP regulates histidine metabolism. Bacterial histidine metabolism involves 10 histidine biosynthesis genes coding for nine enzymes that catalyze 10 enzymatic reactions. Our result showed that eight of these histidine biosynthetic genes, hisABCDFGHI (XAC1828 to XAC1835), were dramatically down-regulated in the ΔphoP mutant, The proteins encoded by these genes include 1-(5-phosphoribosyl)-5-[(5-phosphoribosylamino) methylideneamino] imidazole-4-carboxamide isomerase, histidine biosynthesis bifunctional protein, histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase, histidinol dehydrogenase, imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit, imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit and ATP phosphoribosyl transferase. In addition, the expression of both hutH and hutU, which are involved in the histidine utilization pathway, was also significantly decreased (Table 6).
PhoP is involved in general metabolism and transport. Many genes involved in general metabolism were regulated by PhoP, including PstS, PstC, PstA and PstB, all of which are involved in phosphate and amino acid transport. In addition, the expression of XacPNP (Xac 2654), encoding a plant natriuretic peptide (PNP)-like protein that is related to virulence in X. citri subsp. citri [35], was reduced in ΔphoP. In higher plants, PNPs elicit a number of responses that contribute to the regulation of homeostasis and growth [36], and help to induce the opening of stomata [37]. XacPNP shares significant sequence similarity and identical domain structure with other PNPs, and may also cause plant physiological responses such as stomatal opening [35].
PhoP regulates the expression of some virulence-related genes. To verify the RNA-Seq results and confirm the downstream genes regulated by PhoP, the expression of some target genes was examined using qRT-PCR -based analysis. The target genes included hrpG, hrpX, hrcN and hrcQ (T3SS regulators), avrBs2 and avrXacE1 (avirulence protein), egl0028 (Cellulase), cheA and cheY (chemotaxis protein), fliC (flagellin), flhF(flagellar biosynthesis regulator), pqqG (pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthesis protein), rpoN (RNA polymerase factor sigma-54), XacPNP (plant natriuretic peptide-like protein), virB1 (T4SS protein) and pthA (T3SS effector). Results showed that the expression of hrpG, hrpX, hrcN, hrcQ, avrBs2, avrXacE1, egl0028 (Cellulase), cheA, cheY, fliC, flhF, pqqG, rpoN, XacPNP and pthA was significantly lower in the ΔphoP mutant compared with XHG3, while the expression of virB1 was increased (Figure 7), which was consistent with the RNA-sequencing results (Supplementary Figure S3).

4. Discussion

PhoQ/PhoP is one of the best characterized TCS, a family of bacterial systems that sense environmental cues and effectors and trigger gene expression in response to these cues to enhance bacterial survival under stressful conditions or within host cells. The PhoQ/PhoP system has so far been characterized in S. Typhimurium, Shigella sp., D. dadantii, X. oryzae pv. oryzae, and X. campestris pv. campestris [18,20,22,23,38,39]. However, little is known about the PhoQ/PhoP proteins in the important plant pathogen X. citri subsp. citri. In this study, we investigated the potential contribution of PhoP to the virulence and fitness of X. citri subsp. citri, identified PhoP-regulated genes by RNA-seq analysis and demonstrated that PhoP is an important regulator involved in motility, biofilm formation, exoenzymes production and virulence of X. citri subsp. citri in citrus plants. In addition, we found that PhoP positively regulates the expression of genes involved in the T3SS, chemotaxis, flagella biosynthesis, and histidine metabolism in X. citri subsp. citri.
Chemotaxis is essential for the initial stages of bacterial infection, with several genes involved in chemotaxis signaling shown to be critical for entry of a pathogen into host cells [40]. Our study indicated that of the 17 bacterial chemotaxis genes, 16 of them showed decreased expression in the ΔphoP mutant, including cheW, cheA, cheY and cheZ.
In animal-pathogenic species Yersinia enterocolitica and Shewanella oneidensis, bacterial motility and biofilm formation are closely related to pathogenicity [41,42]. Flagella play a critical role in biofilm formation in Y. enterocolitica. Likewise, in plant-pathogenic bacterium, X. campestris pv. campestris, biofilm formation is controlled by cell-cell signaling and is required for full virulence in plant hosts [43], in X. citri subsp. citri, swimming motility, biofilm formation is required for canker development [28,44]. Our RNA-seq analysis showed that 25 genes involved in flagellar assembly, including fliACEFGILMNPR, flhABF, and flgBCDEFGHIJKL, had distinctly lower levels of expression in ΔphoP compared with the wild-type strain. Although primarily associated with cell movement, flagella also act as virulence determinants [44]. The expression of chemotaxis and motility genes by X. oryzae pv. oryzae is required for entry, colonization, and virulence in the host [45]. In the current study, the ΔphoP mutant showed a significant reduction in motility and biofilm formation compared with wide-type strain XHG3, further qRT-PCR analysis further confirmed the decreased expression of flagella- and chemotaxis-associated genes fliC, flhF, cheA, cheY, and rpoN in ΔphoP. Therefore, we concluded that the observed repression of motility and biofilm formation in the mutant strain results from the altered expression of genes involved in chemotaxis and flagellar biosynthesis.
X. citri subsp. citri uses several mechanisms to colonize host plants. These include the T3SS, which delivers virulence effector proteins [9,10,46] and the type II secretion system (T2SS), which is thought to be involved in canker development [11,47,48]. Mutation of xpsD, coding for a component of the T2SS, hinders the secretions of cellulase, protease, and amylase, and affects the ability of X. citri subsp. citri to colonize tissues and hydrolyze cellulose [47]. BglC3, an extracellular endoglucanase, is necessary for the full virulence of X.citri subsp. citri [12]. Extracellular enzymes have been extensively characterized in Pectobacterium and Dickeya species because of their essential functions in the development of soft rot symptoms [49]. Our results showed that the activities of extracellular enzymes such as polygalacturonase (PG), cellulase and amylase were significantly decreased in ΔphoP. In addition, the ΔphoP mutant demonstrated significantly reduced virulence compared with the wild-type strain when inoculated onto citrus leaves. Using qRT-PCR analysis, we also showed that the expression of egl0028, encoding cellulose, was reduced in ΔphoP.
The T3SS plays an important role in bacterial pathogenicity. It is encoded by a cluster of hypersensitive response and pathogenicity (hrp) genes that are critical for bacterial virulence. The T3SS translocates effector proteins into plant cells, where they either suppress the host defense system or interfere with host cellular processes [12]. The expression of hrp genes is controlled by two regulators HrpG and HrpX, which are important pathogenicity regulators in X. citri subsp. citri [8,50]. The transcriptome analysis carried out in the current study showed that PhoP positively regulates many genes involved in the T3SS, including 22 hrp genes and 15 putative and known T3SS effectors, while further qRT-PCR analysis confirmed that PhoP positively regulates the expression of hrpG, hrpX, hrcN, hrcQ, and pthA (T3SS effector). PhoQ/PhoP is also required for hrpG expression and virulence in X. oryzae pv. oryzae [23]. Accordingly, we believe that PhoP can influence the pathogenicity of X. citri subsp. citri through the expression of hrp genes and T3SS effectors.
RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR analyses also confirmed that XacPNP (Xac2654), which encodes a PNP-like protein, was positively regulated by PhoP. PNPs contributed to the regulation of homeostasis reponses and growth. XacPNP plays an important role in the infection process by modifying host responses to create favorable conditions for X. citri subsp. citri growth [35]. Therefore, we can infer that XacPNP is involved in PhoP-mediated regulation of pathogenicity. In addition to altering plant defenses, X. citri subsp. citri must adapt its metabolism to the nutrient-poor and toxin-laden (either preformed or induced) intercellular spaces of host cells [51], which form part of the host defense responses [52,53]. Our transcriptomic analysis indicated that PhoP alters the expression of many genes involved in metabolic processes. For example, in the histidine metabolism, our results showed that eight histidine biosynthetic genes (hisABCDFGHI) were dramatically down-regulated in ΔphoP, while the expressions of both hutH and hutU, which are involved in the histidine utilization pathway, was also significantly decreased. Histidine biosynthesis requires 10 enzymatic reactions involving proteins encoded by seven bacterial genes, Imidazoleglycerol-phosphate dehydratase (IGPD) catalyzes the sixth step in the histidine biosynthesis pathway, and is the first identified enzyme exclusively dedicated to histidine biosynthesis in bacteria. Mutations in hisB and IGPD inhibit biofilm formation in Staphylococcus xylosus [54], while mutations within histidine metabolism genes hisD, FhisF, hisG and hutG lead to decreased virulence of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive [55]. Further, a recent study showed that the histidine utilization (Hut) pathway is involved in quorum sensing and contributes to virulence in X. oryzae pv. oryzae, as X. oryzae pv. oryzae ΔhutG and ΔhutU deletion mutants showed reduced virulence [56]. Therefore, we deduce that histidine metabolism may also be necessary for the virulence of X. citri subsp. citri.
T4SS play a fundamental role in disease progression in several important animal and human pathogens [57] as well as in plant pathogens Agrobacterium tumefaciens [58] and Erwinia sp. [59]. However, our findings showed that 11 T4SS genes and 13 genes coding for T4SS-interacting proteins were up-regulated in ΔphoP. Thus, exactly how PhoP affects the expression of T4SS genes is not yet clear, and requires further investigation.
In plant-pathogenic bacteria, PhoP controls a key aspect of X. oryzae pv. oryzae AvrXA21 virulence through regulation of hrpG [23]. Among all PhoP-regulated genes, 137 genes were down-regulated while 77 genes were upregulated in the phoP knockout mutant of X. oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99A, which encode primarily hypothetical proteins or proteins associated with the cell envelope, protein fate, regulatory functions, or transport and binding [24]. In Dickeya dadantii 3937, a mutation in phoQ affects transcription of at least 40 genes. However, there was no investigation involving PhoP [22]. Our results in X.citri subsp. citri show that PhoP regulates more genes and has more extensive functions. Therefore, we may conclude that PhoP is a global regulatory factor in X. citri subsp. citri, affecting the pathogenicity and virulence of this important citrus pathogen by regulating chemotaxis and motility, biofilm formation, T3SS proteins, histidine biosynthesis, and the production of extracellular enzymes. However, further investigation of these regulatory mechanisms is needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/10/5/340/s1, Figure S1: Agarose gel showing PCR detection of wild-type strain XHG3, deletion mutant ΔphoP, and complementation strain R-phoP. Figure S2: Agarose gel electrophoresis of total RNA. Figure S3: Verification of log2.Fold_change values for 16 virulence-associated genes by qRT-PCR and RNA-seq analyses. Table S1: Primers used in this study. Table S2: Statistics of reads map to reference genome. Table S3: ΔphoP vs. XHG3 difference genes by RNA-seq (∣log2.Fold_change∣≧1.2). Table S4: Analysis of KEGG pathway significant enrichment between ΔphoP and XHG3.

Author Contributions

Chu-dan Wei: literature search, figures, data collection, Writing-Original Draft Preparation; Tian Ding: data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, Chang-qing Chang: data analysis, data interpretation, writing; Xing-wei Li: Investigation, Resources, Formal Analysis; Cheng-peng Yu: Data Curation, soft. data interpretation; Qiong-guang Liu: study design, Writing Review & Editing, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371903).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schaad, N.W.; Postnikova, E.; Lacy, G.; Sechler, A.; Agarkova, L.; Stromberg, P.E.; Stromberg, V.K.; Vidaver, A.K. Emended classification of Xanthomonad pathogens on citrus. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 29, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cubero, J.; Graham, J.H. Genetic relationship among worldwide strains of Xanthomonas causing canker in citrus species and design of new primers for their identification by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 1257–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Das, A.K. Citrus canker—A review. J. Appl. Hortic. 2003, 5, 52–60. [Google Scholar]
  4. Graham, J.H.; Gottwald, T.R.; Cubero, J.; Achor, D.S. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv citri: Factors affecting successful eradication of citrus canker. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2004, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Buttner, D.; Bonas, U. Regulation and secretion of Xanthomonas virulence factors. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 34, 107–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yan, Q.; Wang, N. The ColR/ColS two-component system plays multiple roles in the pathogenicity of the citrus canker pathogen Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 1590–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Da Silva, A.C.R.; Ferro, J.A.; Reinach, F.C.; Farah, C.S.; Furlan, L.R.; Quaggio, R.B.; Monteiro-Vitorello, C.B.; Van Sluys, M.A.; Almeida, N.F.; Alves, L.M.C.; et al. Comparison of the genomes of two Xanthomonas pathogens with differing host specificities. Nature 2002, 417, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guo, Y.P.; Figueiredo, F.; Jones, J.; Wang, N. HrpG and HrpX play global roles in coordinating different virulence traits of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Mol. Plant. Microbe Inter. 2011, 24, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dunger, G.; Garofalo, C.G.; Gottig, N.; Garavaglia, B.S.; Rosa, M.C.P.; Farah, C.S.; Orellano, E.G.; Ottado, J. Analysis of three Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri effector proteins in pathogenicity and their interactions with host plant proteins. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2012, 13, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sgro, G.G.; Ficarra, F.A.; Dunger, G.; Scarpec, T.E.; Valle, E.M.; Cortadi, A.; Orellano, E.G.; Gottig, N.; Ottado, J. Contribution of a harpin protein from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri to pathogen virulence. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2012, 13, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Song, X.; Guo, J.; Ma, W.X.; Ji, Z.Y.; Zou, L.F.; Chen, G.Y.; Zou, H.S. Identification of seven novel virulence genes from Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri by Tn5-based random mutagenesis. J. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xia, T.; Li, Y.J.; Sun, D.L.; Zhuo, T.; Fan, X.J.; Zou, H.S. Identification of an extracellular endoglucanase that is required for full virulence in Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Plos ONE 2016, 11, e0151017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duan, Y.; Castaneda, A.; Zhao, G.; Erdos, G.; Gabriel, D. Expression of a single, host-specific, bacterial pathogenicity gene in plant cells elicits division, enlargement, and cell death. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 1999, 12, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, Y.P.; Sagaram, U.S.; Kim, J.S.; Wang, N. Requirement of the galU gene for polysaccharide production by and pathogenicity and growth in planta of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2234–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Moreira, L.M.; Almeida, N.F.; Potnis, N.; Digiampietri, L.A.; Adi, S.S.; Bortolossi, J.C.; da Silva, A.C.; da Silva, A.M.; de Moraes, F.E.; de Oliveira, J.C.; et al. Novel insights into the genomic basis of citrus canker based on the genome sequences of two strains of Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Groisman, E.A. The pleiotropic two-component regulatory system PhoP/PhoQ. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 1835–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Derzelle, S.; Turlin, E.; Duchaud, E.; Pages, S.; Kunst, F.; Givaudan, A.; Danchin, A. The PhoP/PhoQ two-component regulatory system of Photorhabdus luminescens is essential for virulence in insects. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Peng, B.Y.; Pan, Y.; Li, R.J.; Wei, J.W.; Liang, F.; Wang, L.; Wang, F.F.; Qian, W. An essential regulatory system originating from polygenic transcriptional rewiring of PhoP-PhoQ of Xanthomonas campestris. Genetics 2017, 206, 2207–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bader, M.W.; Sanowar, S.; Daley, M.E.; Schneider, A.R.; Cho, U.S.; Xu, W.Q.; Klevit, R.E.; Le Moual, H.; Miller, S. Recognition of antimicrobial peptides by a bacterial sensor kinase. Cell 2005, 122, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Moss, J.E.; Fisher, P.E.; Vick, B.; Groisman, E.A.; Zychilinsky, A. The regulatory protein PhoP controls susceptibility to the host inflammatory response in Shigella flexneri. Cell. Microbiol. 2000, 2, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oyston, P.C.F.; Dorrell, N.; Williams, K.; Li, S.R.; Green, M.; Titball, R.W.; Wren, B.W. The response regulator PhoP is important for survival under conditions of macrophage-induced stress and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 3419–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Venkatesh, B.; Babujee, L.; Liu, H.; Hedley, P.; Fujikawa, T.; Birch, P.; Toth, I.; Tsuyumu, S. The Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937 PhoQ sensor kinase regulates several virulence determinants. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3088–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, S.W.; Jeong, K.S.; Han, S.W.; Lee, S.E.; Phee, B.K.; Hahn, T.R.; Ronald, P. The Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae PhoPQ two-component system is required for AvrXA21 activity, hrpG expression, and virulence. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 2183–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sriariyanun, M.; Seo, Y.S.; Phetsom, J. Identification of PhoP regulon members in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99A. In 4th International Conference on Chemical, Biological And Environmental Engineering; IACSIT Press: Singapore, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Perez, J.C.; Shin, D.; Zwir, I.; Latifi, T.; Hadley, T.J.; Groisman, E.A. Evolution of a bacterial regulon controlling virulence and Mg2+Homeostasis. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zwir, I.; Latifi, T.; Perez, J.C.; Huang, H.; Groisman, E.A. The promoter architectural landscape of the Salmonella PhoP regulon. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 84, 463–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Monsieurs, P.; De Keersmaecker, S.; Navarre, W.W.; Bader, M.W.; De Smet, F.; Mcclelland, M.; Fang, F.C.; De Moor, B.; Vanderleyden, J.; Marchal, K. Comparison of the PhoPQ regulon in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Evol. 2005, 60, 462–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rigano, L.A.; Siciliano, F.; Enrique, R.; Sendin, L.; Filippone, P.; Torres, P.S.; Questa, J.; Dow, J.M.; Castagnaro, A.P.; Vojnov, A.A.; et al. Biofilm formation, epiphytic fitness, and canker development in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Mol. Plant. Microbe Inter. 2007, 20, 1222–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shen, Y.W.; Chern, M.; Silva, F.G.; Ronald, P. Isolation of a Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae flagellar operon region and molecular characterization of flhF. Mol. Plant. Microbe Inter. 2001, 14, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, J.L.; Liu, Y.N.; Barber, C.E.; Dow, J.M.; Wootton, J.C.; Daniels, M.J. Genetic and molecular analysis of a cluster of rpf genes involved in positive regulation of synthesis of extracellular enzymes and polysaccharide in Xanthomonas campestris pathovar campestris. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1991, 226, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rybak, M.; Minsavage, G.V.; Stall, R.E.; Jones, J.B. Identification of Xanthomonas citri ssp. citri host specificity genes in a heterologous expression host. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2009, 10, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Southey-Pillig, C.J.; Davies, D.G.; Sauer, K. Characterization of temporal protein production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8114–8126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Branda, S.S.; Vik, A.; Friedman, L.; Kolter, R. Biofilms: The matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gottig, N.; Garavaglia, B.S.; Daurelio, L.D.; Valentine, A.; Gehring, C.; Orellano, E.G.; Ottado, J. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri uses a plant natriuretic peptide-like protein to modify host homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008, 5, 18631–18636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gehring, C.A.; Irving, H.R. Natriuretic peptides—A class of heterologous molecules in plants. Inter. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35, 1318–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ludidi, N.; Morse, M.; Sayed, M.; Wherrett, T.; Shabala, S.; Gehring, C. A recombinant plant natriuretic peptide causes rapid and spatially differentiated K+, Na+ and H+ flux changes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant. Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 1093–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bijlsma, J.J.E.; Groisman, E.A. The PhoP/PhoQ system controls the intramacrophage type three secretion system of Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 57, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Adams, P.; Fowler, R.; Kinsella, N.; Howell, G.; Farris, M.; Coote, P.; O’Connor, C.D. Proteomic detection of PhoPQ- and acid-mediated repression of Salmonella motility. Proteomics 2001, 1, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Matilla, M.A.; Krell, T. The effect of bacterial chemotaxis on host infection and pathogenicity. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 42, fux052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, T.J.; Young, B.M.; Young, G.M. Effect of flagellar mutations on Yersinia enterocolitica biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5466–5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liang, Y.L.; Gao, H.C.; Chen, J.R.; Dong, Y.Y.; Wu, L.; He, Z.L.; Liu, X.D.; Qiu, G.Z.; Zhou, J.Z. Pellicle formation in Shewanella oneidensis. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dow, J.M.; Crossman, L.; Findlay, K.; He, Y.Q.; Feng, J.X.; Tang, J.L. Biofilm dispersal in Xanthomonas campestris is controlled by cell–cell signaling and is required for full virulence to plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10995–11000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Malamud, F.; Torres, P.S.; Roeschlin, R.; Rigano, L.A.; Enrique, R.; Bonomi, H.R.; Castagnaro, A.P.; Marano, M.R.; Vojnov, A.A. The Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri flagellum is required for mature biofilm and canker development. Microbiology 2011, 157, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar Verma, R.; Samal, B.; Chatterjee, S. Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae chemotaxis components and chemoreceptor Mcp2 are involved in the sensing of constituents of xylem sap and contribute to the regulation of virulence-associated functions and entry into rice. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2018, 19, 2397–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dunger, G.; Arabolaza, A.L.; Gottig, N.; Orellano, E.G.; Ottado, J. Participation of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri hrp cluster in citrus canker and nonhost plant responses. Plant. Pathology. 2005, 54, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baptista, J.C.; Machado, M.A.; Homem, R.A.; Torres, P.S.; Vojnov, A.A.; do Amaral, A.M. Mutation in the xpsD gene of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri affects cellulose degradation and virulence. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2010, 33, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yan, Q.; Wang, N. High-throughput screening and analysis of genes of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri involved in citrus canker symptom development. Mol. Plant. Microbe Inter. 2012, 25, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Matsumoto, H.; Jitareerat, P.; Baba, Y.; Tsuyumu, S. Comparative study of regulatory mechanisms for pectinase production by Erwinia carotovora subsp carotovora and Erwinia chrysanthemi. Mol. Plant. Microbe Inter. 2003, 16, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Calva., E.; Oropeza, R. Two-component signal transduction systems, environmental signals, and virulence. Microbial. Ecol. 2006, 51, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alfano, J.R.; Collmer, A. Bacterial pathogens in plants: Life up against the wall. Plant. Cell. 1996, 8, 1683–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Segura, A.; Moreno, M.; Madueno, F.; Molina, A.; Garcia-Olmedo, F. Snakin-1, a peptide from potato that is active against plant pathogens. Mol. Plant. Microbe Inter. 1999, 12, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Osbourn, A.E. Preformed antimicrobial compounds and plant defense against fungal attack. Plant. Cell. 1996, 8, 1821–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhou, Y.H.; Xu, C.G.; Yang, Y.B.; Xing, X.X.; Liu, X.; Qu, Q.W.; Ding, W.Y.; Bello-Onaghise, G.; Li, Y.H. Histidine metabolism and IGPD play a key role in cefquinome inhibiting biofilm formation of Staphylococcus xylosus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Matas, I.M.; Lambertsen, L.; Rodrguez-Moreno, L.; Ramos, C. Identification of novel virulence genes and metabolic pathways required for full fitness of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive (Olea europaea) knots. New Phytologist. 2012, 196, 1182–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liang, X.Y.; Yu, X.Y.; Pan, X.Y.; Wu, J.; Duan, Y.B.; Wang, J.X.; Zhou, M.G. A thiadiazole reduces the virulence of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae by inhibiting the histidine utilization pathway and quorum sensing. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 16–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Christie, P.J. Type IV secretion: Intercellular transfer of macromolecules by systems ancestrally related to conjugation machines. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 40, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, Z.M.; Sagulenko, E.; Ding, Z.Y.; Christie, P.J. Activities of virE1 and the VirE1 secretion chaperone in export of the multifunctional VirE2 effector via an Agrobacterium type IV secretion pathway. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 3855–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bell, K.S.; Sebaihia, M.; Pritchard, L.; Holden, M.T.G.; Hyman, L.J.; Holeva, M.C.; Thomson, N.R.; Bentley, S.D.; Churcher, L.J.C.; Mungall, K.; et al. Genome sequence of the enterobacterial phytopathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and characterization of virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 11105–11110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Growth curves of wild-type strain XHG3, mutant strain ΔphoP and complementation strain R-phoP. The growth (OD600) of each strain in YEB broth at 30 °C was measured at 2-h intervals. Data points represent the means of three biological replicates.
Figure 1. Growth curves of wild-type strain XHG3, mutant strain ΔphoP and complementation strain R-phoP. The growth (OD600) of each strain in YEB broth at 30 °C was measured at 2-h intervals. Data points represent the means of three biological replicates.
Genes 10 00340 g001
Figure 2. Motility assay for wild-type strain XHG3, mutant strain ΔphoP, and complementation strain R-phoP. Aliquots (2 μL) of each of the bacterial suspensions were inoculated onto the surface of semi-solid agar medium plate and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C to assess the bacterial motility. (A) the ΔphoP mutant showed considerably reduced motility compared with wild-type strain XHG3; (B) with a 70.6% reduction in colony diameter compared with that of strain XHG3.
Figure 2. Motility assay for wild-type strain XHG3, mutant strain ΔphoP, and complementation strain R-phoP. Aliquots (2 μL) of each of the bacterial suspensions were inoculated onto the surface of semi-solid agar medium plate and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C to assess the bacterial motility. (A) the ΔphoP mutant showed considerably reduced motility compared with wild-type strain XHG3; (B) with a 70.6% reduction in colony diameter compared with that of strain XHG3.
Genes 10 00340 g002aGenes 10 00340 g002b
Figure 3. Biofilm formation by wild-type strain XHG3, the ΔphoP mutant and complementation strain R-phoP. A 10-μL aliquot of bacterial cell culture (OD600 = 0.5) was inoculated into tubes containing SONG medium and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C.
Figure 3. Biofilm formation by wild-type strain XHG3, the ΔphoP mutant and complementation strain R-phoP. A 10-μL aliquot of bacterial cell culture (OD600 = 0.5) was inoculated into tubes containing SONG medium and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C.
Genes 10 00340 g003
Figure 4. Determination of extracellular enzymes produced by wild-type strain XHG3, the ΔphoP mutant and complementation strain R-phoP. Thirty-microliter aliquots of bacterial supernatants were added to the wells of the exoenzyme test plates for further cultivation at 28 °C for 24 h. Production of hydrolysis zones by protease (A), polygalacturonase (PG) (B), amylase (C) and cellulase (D) was assessed on plates containing skimmed milk (A), polygalacturonate (B), starch (C) and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (D), respectively. Bar graph (E) showing the diameters of hydrolysis zones from Figure 4A–D. Values are the means of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Figure 4. Determination of extracellular enzymes produced by wild-type strain XHG3, the ΔphoP mutant and complementation strain R-phoP. Thirty-microliter aliquots of bacterial supernatants were added to the wells of the exoenzyme test plates for further cultivation at 28 °C for 24 h. Production of hydrolysis zones by protease (A), polygalacturonase (PG) (B), amylase (C) and cellulase (D) was assessed on plates containing skimmed milk (A), polygalacturonate (B), starch (C) and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (D), respectively. Bar graph (E) showing the diameters of hydrolysis zones from Figure 4A–D. Values are the means of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Genes 10 00340 g004
Figure 5. Pathogenicity assay for wild-type strain XHG3, the ΔphoP mutant, and complementation strain R-phoP on citrus leaves. The leaves of two citrus cultivars, Xinhuigan (A) and Orah (B), were inoculated with bacterial suspension (107 CFU/mL) over 3 days using needleless syringes. Leaves inoculated with ΔphoP showed slight canker symptoms, while obvious canker symptoms were observed on leaves inoculated with the wild-type or complementation strains.
Figure 5. Pathogenicity assay for wild-type strain XHG3, the ΔphoP mutant, and complementation strain R-phoP on citrus leaves. The leaves of two citrus cultivars, Xinhuigan (A) and Orah (B), were inoculated with bacterial suspension (107 CFU/mL) over 3 days using needleless syringes. Leaves inoculated with ΔphoP showed slight canker symptoms, while obvious canker symptoms were observed on leaves inoculated with the wild-type or complementation strains.
Genes 10 00340 g005
Figure 6. Distribution of differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between XHG3 and ΔphoP by enriched gene ontology (GO) terms. DEGs in ΔphoP are annotated by GO. The 20 most enriched GO terms are shown. Significantly over-represented GO terms with a corrected P-value of <0.05 are marked with an asterisk.
Figure 6. Distribution of differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between XHG3 and ΔphoP by enriched gene ontology (GO) terms. DEGs in ΔphoP are annotated by GO. The 20 most enriched GO terms are shown. Significantly over-represented GO terms with a corrected P-value of <0.05 are marked with an asterisk.
Genes 10 00340 g006
Figure 7. Relative expression of genes associated with the virulence of wild-type strain XHG3 and mutant strain ΔphoP as determined by qRT-PCR analysis. The 16S rRNA gene was used as an endogenous control to normalize gene expression data. Target genes were: hrpG, hrpX, hrcN, and hrcQ (T3SS regulators), avrBs2 and avrXacE1 (avirulence proteins), egl0028 (cellulase), cheA and cheY (chemotaxis proteins), fliC (flagellin), flhF (flagellar biosynthesis regulator), pqqG (pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthesis protein), rpoN (RNA polymerase sigma factor 54), XacPNP (plant natriuretic peptide-like protein), virB1 (T4SS protein), pthA (T3SS effector).
Figure 7. Relative expression of genes associated with the virulence of wild-type strain XHG3 and mutant strain ΔphoP as determined by qRT-PCR analysis. The 16S rRNA gene was used as an endogenous control to normalize gene expression data. Target genes were: hrpG, hrpX, hrcN, and hrcQ (T3SS regulators), avrBs2 and avrXacE1 (avirulence proteins), egl0028 (cellulase), cheA and cheY (chemotaxis proteins), fliC (flagellin), flhF (flagellar biosynthesis regulator), pqqG (pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthesis protein), rpoN (RNA polymerase sigma factor 54), XacPNP (plant natriuretic peptide-like protein), virB1 (T4SS protein), pthA (T3SS effector).
Genes 10 00340 g007
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Strain and Plasmid Relevant Characteristics Origin
X. citri subsp. citri
XHG3Wild-type strainThis study
ΔphoPphoP knock-out mutant of XHG3This study
R-phoPcomplementation strain of ΔphoPThis study
E. coli
K12 CC118gyrA,recA,λ pirLab collection
DH5αdeoR,recA,endA,hsdR,supE,thi,gyrA,relALab collection
Plasmids
pKNG101SmR,SacB,mobRK2,oriR6K (pir-minus)Lab collection
pKNG-ΔphoPPhoP knock-out fragment ligated on pKNG101This study
pBBR1- phoPPhoP complementation fragment ligated on pBBR1MCS4This study
Table 2. Comparison of T3SS genes cluster expression in the XHG3 and ΔphoP.
Table 2. Comparison of T3SS genes cluster expression in the XHG3 and ΔphoP.
GeneLocus taglog2.Fold_change.q-value
hrpFXAC0394−1.776.33 × 10−14
hpaBXAC0396−3.200
hrpEXAC0397−5.167.95 × 10−4
hrpD6XAC0398−1.958.94 × 10−7
hrpD5XAC0399−2.821.82 × 10−5
hpaAXAC0400−2.462.68 × 10−3
hrcSXAC0401−3.861.11 × 10−17
hrcRXAC0403−4.392.06 × 10−16
hrcQXAC0404−4.261.14 × 10−12
hrcVXAC0405−2.037.26 × 10−12
hrcUXAC0406−2.998.22 × 10−28
hrpB1XAC0407−4.213.45 × 10−12
hrpB2XAC0408−4.026.59 × 10−20
hrcJXAC0409−4.481.95 × 10−12
hrpB4XAC0410−3.036.46 × 10−7
hrpB5XAC0411−4.056.51 × 10−9
hrcNXAC0412−3.082.02 × 10−4
hrpB7XAC0413−3.762.94 × 10−6
hrcTXAC0414−2.855.01 × 10−7
hrcCXAC0415−1.693.18 × 10−183
hpa1XAC0416−-6.066.33 × 10−14
log2.Fold_change: log2 (readcount_ΔphoP / readcount_XHG3).
Table 3. Gene expression of T3SS effectors between ΔphoP and XHG3.
Table 3. Gene expression of T3SS effectors between ΔphoP and XHG3.
Effector familyLocus taglog2.Fold_change.q-value
AvrBs2XAC0076−1.825.36 × 10−8
AvrBs3(PthA1)XACa002--
AvrBs3(PthA2)XACa0039--
AvrBs3(PthA3)XACb0015--
AvrBs3(PthA4)XACb0065--
HrpW (PopW)XAC2922−2.522.41 × 10−55
XopAD (Skwp, RSc3401)XAC4213−2.132.92 × 10−44
XopAE (HpaF/G/PopC)XAC0393NN
XopAI (HopO1 (HopPto, HopPtoS), HopAI1 (HolPtoAI))XAC3230−1.992.05 × 10−26
XopAK (HopAK1 (HopPtoK, HolPtoAB) C terminal domainXAC3666−2.052.38 × 10−7
XopE1 (AvrXacE1, HopX, AvrPPhE)XAC0286−1.791.61 × 10−17
XopE2 (AvrXacE3, AvrXccE1)XACb0011NN
XopE3 (AvrXacE2, HopX, AvrPPhE)XAC3224−1.112.24 × 10−3
XopF2XAC2785NN
XopIXAC0754−2.351.60 × 10−7
XopKXAC3085−3.201.40 × 10−32
XopLXAC3090NN
XopN (HopAU1)XAC2786−2.286.35 × 10−23
XopPXAC1208−1.248.87 × 10−4
XopQ (HopQ1)XAC4333−3.845.58 × 10−19
XopRXAC0277−2.614.79 × 10−25
XopVXAC0601NN
XopX (HolPsyAE)XAC0543−2.797.16 × 10−51
XopZ (HopAS, AWR)XAC2009XAC2990−2.35N6.46 × 10−19N
Note: -, do not show in the RNA-Seq; N, not considered expression difference, log2. Fold_change: log2 (read count_ΔphoP / read count_XHG3).
Table 4. Gene expression of T4SS between ΔphoP and XHG3.
Table 4. Gene expression of T4SS between ΔphoP and XHG3.
GeneLocus taglog2.Fold_change.q-value
virB4XAC26142.341.57 × 10−258
virB1XAC26172.908.15 × 10−188
virB11XAC26182.185.55 × 10−99
virB10XAC26192.196.58 × 10−139
virB8XAC26211.862.10 × 10−93
virD4XAC26231.941.22 × 10−115
XAC0096XAC00962.996.06 × 10−134
XAC1918XAC19181.621.14 × 10−12
XAC2609XAC26091.772.55 × 10−135
XAC2610XAC26101.693.98 × 10−128
phlAXAC28852.041.60 × 10−42
XAC0323XAC03232.122.22 × 10−26
HIXAC04662.228.25 × 10−106
Cw1LXAC36342.19.38 × 10−43
log2.Fold_change: log2 (read count_ΔphoP/read count_XHG3).
Table 5. Expression of flagellar assembly and bacterial chemotaxis genes in ΔphoP.
Table 5. Expression of flagellar assembly and bacterial chemotaxis genes in ΔphoP.
Gene_idlog2.Fold_changeP-valueGene Description
XAC2447−2.73591.47 × 10−4Chemotaxis protein CheW/cheW
XAC2448−2.9082.51 × 10−16Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I/tsr
XAC3213−1.40024.098 × 10−3Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I/GN=tsr
XAC2866−1.64550Methyl-accepting chemotaxis citrate transducer/tcp
XAC1894−1.60169.78 × 10−5Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I/tsr
XAC1899−1.2572.948 × 10−3Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I/tsr
XAC1892−1.96052.22 × 10−5Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I/tsr
XAC18951.372.06 × 10−8Methyl-accepting chemotaxis serine transducer/
XAC1930−2.39199.80 × 10−19Chemotaxis protein CheA/cheA
XAC1931−2.1476.31 × 10−9Protein phosphatase CheZ/cheZ
XAC1932−2.09683.54 × 10−8Chemotaxis protein CheY/cheY
XAC1933−2.68547.24 × 10−12RNA polymerase sigma factor for flagellar operon/fliA
XAC1934−2.36753.02 × 10−10Flagellum site-determining protein YlxH/ylxH
XAC1935−4.42176.82 × 10−24Flagellar biosynthesis protein FlhF/flhF
XAC1936−2.96956.93 × 10−18Flagellar biosynthesis protein FlhA/flhA
XAC1937−3.07152.47 × 10−5Flagellar biosynthetic protein FlhB/flhB
XAC1938−1.82771.47 × 10−5Uncharacterized signaling protein PA1727/PA1727//0
XAC1940−2.23029.73 × 10−10Uncharacterized signaling protein CC_0091/GN=CC_0091
XAC1941−2.21991.924 × 10−3Flagellar biosynthetic protein FliR/fliR
XAC1942−2.78653.83 × 10−4-//-
XAC1944−1.76053.91 × 10−9Flagellar biosynthetic protein FliP/fliP
XAC1945−3.51391.58 × 10−6-//-
XAC1946−3.92250.853 × 10−3Flagellar motor switch protein FliN/fliN
XAC1947−3.4921.35 × 10−8Flagellar motor switch protein FliM/fliM
XAC1948−2.92481.76 × 10−8Flagellar protein FliL/GN=fliL
XAC1949−2.2641.97 × 10−26-//-
XAC1950−1.5838.74 × 10−4-//-
XAC1951−2.2561.43 × 10−17Flagellum-specific ATP synthase/fliI
XAC1952−2.29217.37 × 10−9-//-
XAC1953−1.56371.43 × 10−8Flagellar motor switch protein FliG/fliG
XAC1954−2.76587.29 × 10−20Flagellar M-ring protein/fliF
XAC1955−4.30332.79 × 10−6Flagellar hook-basal body complex protein FliE/fliE
XAC1969−1.30854.57 × 10−35RNA polymerase sigma-54 factor/rpoN
XAC1975−1.6991.03 × 10−45A-type flagellin/fliC
XAC1976−2.8167.13 × 10−19Flagellar hook-associated protein/flgL
XAC1977−3.04541.74 × 10−23Flagellar hook-associated protein/flgK
XAC1978−3.17149.31 × 10−16Peptidoglycan hydrolase FlgJ/flgJ
XAC1979−3.71311.32 × 10−14Flagellar P-ring protein/flgI
XAC1980−2.95791.89 × 10−8Flagellar L-ring protein/flgH
XAC1981−3.72089.54 × 10−24Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgG/flgG
XAC1982−2.11161.26 × 10−8Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgF/flgF
XAC1983−2.7512.42 × 10−22Flagellar hook protein FlgE/flgE
XAC1984−3.1353.25 × 10−11Basal-body rod modification protein FlgD/flgD
XAC1985−3.18842.24 × 10−4Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgC/flgC
XAC1986−3.72081.21 × 10−12Flagellar basal body rod protein FlgB/flgB
XAC1988−2.87261.54 × 10−6-//-
log2.Fold_change: log2 (read count_ΔphoP/read count_XHG3).
Table 6. Gene expression in histidine metabolism in ΔphoP.
Table 6. Gene expression in histidine metabolism in ΔphoP.
Gene_idlog2.Fold_changeP-valueGene Description
XAC1637−1.41384.91 × 10−7HutH/Histidine ammonia-lyase
XAC1635−1.86049.51 × 10−8HutU/Urocanate hydratase
XAC1834−2.83933.05 × 10−17HisF/Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit
XAC1833−2.9062.31 × 10−20HisA/1-(5-phosphoribosyl)-5-[(5-phosphoribosylamino)methylideneamino] imidazole-4-carboxamide isomerase
XAC1835−2.98273.98 × 10−21HisIE/Histidine biosynthesis bifunctional protein
XAC1832−3.3433.05 × 10−13HisH/Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit
XAC1831−3.34475.44 × 10−70HisB/Histidine biosynthesis bifunctional protein
XAC1829−3.49868.67 × 10−60HisD/Histidinol dehydrogenase
XAC1830−3.5063.44 × 10−40HisC/Histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase
XAC1828−3.75777.18 × 10−43HisG/ATP phosphoribosyltransferase
log2.Fold_change: log2 (read count_ΔphoP/read count_XHG3).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, C.; Ding, T.; Chang, C.; Yu, C.; Li, X.; Liu, Q. Global Regulator PhoP is Necessary for Motility, Biofilm Formation, Exoenzyme Production, and Virulence of Xanthomonas citri Subsp. citri on Citrus Plants. Genes 2019, 10, 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050340

AMA Style

Wei C, Ding T, Chang C, Yu C, Li X, Liu Q. Global Regulator PhoP is Necessary for Motility, Biofilm Formation, Exoenzyme Production, and Virulence of Xanthomonas citri Subsp. citri on Citrus Plants. Genes. 2019; 10(5):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Chudan, Tian Ding, Changqing Chang, Chengpeng Yu, Xingwei Li, and Qiongguang Liu. 2019. "Global Regulator PhoP is Necessary for Motility, Biofilm Formation, Exoenzyme Production, and Virulence of Xanthomonas citri Subsp. citri on Citrus Plants" Genes 10, no. 5: 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop