Next Article in Journal
Evidence for Overlapping and Distinct Biological Activities and Transcriptional Targets Triggered by Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2b Signaling between Mid- and Early Pseudoglandular Stages of Mouse Lung Development
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicles as Drug Carriers for Enzyme Replacement Therapy to Treat CLN2 Batten Disease: Optimization of Drug Administration Routes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Human Cumulus Cells in Long-Term In Vitro Culture Reflect Differential Expression Profile of Genes Responsible for Planned Cell Death and Aging—A Study of New Molecular Markers

1
Division of Infertility and Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 33 Polna St., 60-535 Poznan, Poland
2
Department of Anatomy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 6 Swiecickiego St., 60-781 Poznan, Poland
3
Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 6 Swiecickiego St., 60-781 Poznan, Poland
4
The School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
5
Department of Toxicology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 30 Dojazd St., 60-631 Poznan, Poland
6
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Masaryk University, 20 Jihlavská St., 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
7
Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
8
Physiology Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
9
Department of Veterinary Surgery, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 1 Lwowska St., 87-100 Torun, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(5), 1265; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051265
Submission received: 25 March 2020 / Revised: 16 May 2020 / Accepted: 19 May 2020 / Published: 21 May 2020

Abstract

:
In the ovarian follicle, maturation of the oocyte increases in the presence of somatic cells called cumulus cells (CCs). These cells form a direct barrier between the oocyte and external environment. Thanks to bidirectional communication, they have a direct impact on the oocyte, its quality and development potential. Understanding the genetic profile of CCs appears to be important in elucidating the physiology of oocytes. Long-term in vitro culture of CCs collected from patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation during in vitro fertilization procedure was conducted. Using microarray expression analysis, transcript levels were assessed on day 1, 7, 15, and 30 of culture. Apoptosis and aging of CCs strictly influence oocyte quality and subsequently the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Thus, particular attention was paid to the analysis of genes involved in programmed cell death, aging, and apoptosis. Due to the detailed level of expression analysis of each of the 133 analyzed genes, three groups were selected: first with significantly decreased expression during the culture; second with the statistically lowest increase in expression; and third with the highest significant increase in expression. COL3A1, SFRP4, CTGF, HTR2B, VCAM1, TNFRSF11B genes, belonging to the third group, were identified as potential carriers of information on oocyte quality.

1. Introduction

Appropriate oocyte selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), as a part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure, is mainly based on their morphological assessment. In recent times, evaluation of predictive factors such as follicular fluid markers, as well as genetic and epigenetic properties of cumulus cells (CCs) have become promising in appropriate oocyte selection [1,2].
In the growing ovarian follicle, communication between oocyte and surrounding somatic cells (CCs) is a complicated process. Both CCs and the oocyte actively regulate the bidirectional communication [3,4]. By exchanging molecular signals, CCs communicate permanently with the oocyte, acquiring new properties appropriate for the follicular growth phase. Through their cytoplasmic protrusions, CCs penetrate oocyte zona pellucida, connect to its cell membrane, and form specialized channels called gap junctions (GJs). One of the basic CC functions is the restraining of meiosis and cytoplasmic oocyte maturity, achieved through transmitting molecular signals inwards to the oocyte in the form of metabolites such as AMP or Ca2+ ions. Growth, differentiation and proliferation factors are secreted and transported from the oocyte to CCs. This exchange is carried out precisely through the GJs, connecting their cell membranes with each other [5,6]. Larger molecules such as RNA are also participants of this CC to oocyte transport [7,8]. This fact has been already described many times, but specific functions and transport mechanism are still not fully understood [5]. Furthermore, GJs play an important role in programmed cell death (PCD) regulation [9]. It is presumed that PCD and CC aging strictly influence the oocyte quality and thus, may be regarded as a new predictors of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) efficacy [2,10].
Programmed cell death is a process that eliminates unnecessary and damaged cells. PCD in multicellular organisms allows physiological maintenance of homeostasis. It is a complex, genetically regulated process during which the cell launches molecular and physiological mechanisms leading to its degradation. PCD is induced by extracellular signals that control the proper cell functioning. It is a process that accompanies whole ontogenesis [11,12]. To date, more than 150 unique genes involved in the prevention of PCD have been described in the available literature [13]. PCD plays the most important role during gametogenesis, various stages of embryogenesis, organogenesis, and tissue renewal, as well as during the elimination of abnormal cells [14,15]. Regulation of oocyte maturation and follicular growth includes a cascade of subsequent, specific events. CC communication disorders, leading to diminished oocyte quality, may be caused by disturbances in cumulus cells’ aging and apoptosis processes [14].
Microarray expression technique makes it possible to study and identify new cellular molecular markers and to analyze functions of newly identified transcripts in the examined cells or tissue [16,17,18,19,20,21]. The use of microarrays in the analysis of granulosa cell (GC) gene expression enabled identification of gene ontology (GO) groups involved in oocyte development and apoptosis [22,23,24].
The main goal of this study was to analyze, in human CCs, expression of genes belonging to: “Cell death”, “Programmed cell death”, “Regulation of cell death”, “Positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “Positive regulation of cell death”, “Extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, “Negative regulation of cell death”, “Negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “Aging” GO groups during long-term in vitro culture (IVC). Our main goal was to identify and describe new molecular markers involved in the programmed death, especially apoptosis and aging processes, both in cumulus cells and indirectly in oocytes.
Based on previous work [25,26], it appears that evaluation of CC gene expression involved in programmed cell death, especially apoptosis and aging may be a predictor of oocyte quality and potentially included in the routine IVF procedures. Obtaining the complete CC transcriptomic profile may help to foresee oocyte development potential for successful fertilization and embryo formation. The current research can be helpful in developing accurate and non-invasive tools for predicting ART effectiveness. Presented studies are the first step to identify CC genes that can be used to determine oocyte potential for further fertilization with the use of ART techniques. One of the most important aspects of non-invasive oocyte assessment is the determination of molecular markers for selection of the most appropriate oocytes for further procedures. Additionally, CC long-term in vitro cultures can also show us the directions in which they can differentiate in laboratory conditions. It also seems interesting to correlate growth and differentiation of these cells in in vitro conditions with their in vivo behavior during corpus luteum formation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients Characteristics

Human CCs were obtained from 12 infertile female patients (mean age 33.67 years ± 1.46 (SEM; standard error of the mean), range 25–40) undergoing IVF-ICSI procedure at the Centre of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility at Division of Infertility and Reproductive Endocrinology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was induced by the administration of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH; Gonal F, Merck sp. z o.o, Poland or Puregon, MSD Poland sp. z o.o, Poland) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG; Menopur, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Poland sp. z o.o, Poland) in individualized doses in gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol (Cetrotide, cetrorelix 0.25 mg, Merck sp. z o.o, Poland or Orgalutran, ganirelix 0,25 mg, MSD Poland sp. z o.o, Poland). Ovulation was induced with rh chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG; Ovitrelle, 250 ug, Merck sp. z o.o, Poland) to trigger oocyte maturation on days 9 to 12 after initial gonadotropin administration. Oocyte retrieval was performed by transvaginal ultrasound 36 h after rhCG administration. Patients with known tubal infertility factor were selected for this study. The selected female infertile patients had no history of ovarian surgery, no other chronic or endocrine diseases, and a BMI < 30 kg/m2. We excluded patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), and with poor ovarian response.
This research has been approved by Poznan University of Medical Sciences Bioethical Committee with 1290/18 resolution.

2.2. IVF Patients’ Cumulus Cells Collection

After oocyte pick-up (OPU), embryologists selected oocyte-cumulus complexes (COCs) for further IVF procedure. According to a routine procedure of preparing an oocyte for fertilization by ICSI, denudation was performed. The process consisted of mechanical and enzymatic (800 IU/mL of HYASE-10X) removal of the surrounding oocyte corona radiata and cumulus oophorus somatic cells forming the COC. On average, 10 COCs were obtained from each patient. After complete denudation, oocyte CCs were pooled from individual patients and cultured together. A separate 30-day in vitro culture was carried out for CCs obtained from each patient.

2.3. Long-Term Primary In Vitro Culture

Collected and grouped CCs were washed twice with culture medium and centrifuged at 200× g for 10 min at RT. Culture medium consisted of DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium, Sigma; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10 mg/mL gentamicin (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 2% fetal bovine serum FBS (FBS; Sigma; Merck KGaA), 4 mM l-glutamine (stock 200 mM, Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 10,000 U/mL penicillin and 10,000 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The cells were then counted using the “Neubauer improved” counting chamber (ISO LAB Laborgerate GmbH, DIN Certificate EN ISO 9001). Only the samples in which cells showed a viability of over 90% were used for further culture.
The study based on long-term (30 days) primary in vitro cultures. Four time intervals were investigated: moment 0 (24 h), corresponds approximately to the physiological properties of cells, while the following days show the changes that occur in the cultures; the 7th day of in vitro culture defines short-term culture; the 15th day of culture shows effects of the first passage; the 30th day of culture is the end of long-term in vitro culture.
CCs were cultured at 37 °C in humid 5% CO2 atmosphere. After reaching 90% confluence, cells in the culture were detached from the bottom of the 6-well culture plate culture by 1–2 min incubation with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc). CC culture lasted 30 days. The medium was changed every three days of culture. The cells were harvested on day 1, 7, 15, and 30 of culture. Samples derived from each patient were cultured separately, RNA material was pooled before microarray and RT-qPCR analysis.

2.4. Total RNA Isolation

After harvesting cells on day 1, 7, 15, and 30 of culture, total RNA was isolated. The process of isolation was performed according to modified Chomczyński and Sacchi method [27]. Briefly, CCs were suspended in 1 mL of monophasic guanidine thiocyanate and phenol solution (TRI Reagent®, Sigma; St. Luis, MO, USA; Merck KGaA). In the next step, chloroform was added to separate the phases, with the whole samples centrifuged afterwards. The upper, aqueous phase containing isolated RNA was collected. RNA was extracted using 2-propanol (Sigma; Merck KGaA, catalog number I9516), added in an amount adequate for 1 mL of TRI-reagent. Finally, the RNA was washed with 75% ethanol, dried, resuspended in 100µl of pure water and measured for concentration and purity. The total amount of mRNA was determined based on optical density at 260 nm, RNA purity was estimated using 260/280 nm absorption ratio (NanoDrop spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, Warsaw, Poland). Samples with a 260/280 absorbance coefficient greater than 1.8 were used for further experiments.

2.5. Microarray Expression Analysis

Previously prepared total RNA (100 ng) from each pooled sample were subjected to two rounds of sense cDNA amplification (Ambion® WT Expression Kit, Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The obtained cDNA was used for biotin labeling and fragmentation by Affymetrix GeneChip® WT Terminal Labeling and Hybridization (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Biotin-labeled fragments of cDNA (5.5 μg) were hybridized to the HG-U219 Strip (48 °C/20 h). The next step, the microarrays were washed and stained according to the provided protocol, using the Affymetrix GeneAtlas Fluidics Station. The microarrays were scanned using the GeneAtlas imaging station. Using the Affymetrix GeneAtlasTM Operating Software (v.2.0.0.460, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a preliminary analysis of the scanned systems was performed. The quality of gene expression data was confirmed in accordance with the quality control criteria provided by the software. The obtained CEL files were transferred to the data analysis software.
The analyses and obtained charts were created using the Bioconductor software and R programming language. The CEL file was merged with the description file. Using the Robust Multiarray Averaging (RMA) algorithm, the background was improved, normalized, and the results summarized. To determine the statistical significance of the analyzed genes, moderate t statistics from Bayes’ empirical method were performed. The p-value was corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery indicator. The selection of significantly changed genes was based on p-values less than 0.05 and expression over two-fold.
The list of differentially expressed genes has been imported into the DAVID software, with complete genome selected as the default background [28]. Then, gene ontology (GO) domains were separated. The expression of the analyzed genes was subjected to a hierarchical clustering procedure, necessary for heatmap presentation.
In the next stage, we analyzed the relationship between genes belonging to selected GO terms using the GOplot package [29]. The obtained z-score resulted from up-regulated genes minus down-regulated genes divided by the square root of the count. Thanks to these calculations, it was possible to determine the course of changes of each gene ontology term.
Moreover, to predict the interactions between individual genes, received sets of genes from the selected GO BP terms were loaded into the STRING software (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes). Thanks to the STRING database, we were able to obtain information on protein/gene interactions. This data was developed on the basis of experimental methods, computational forecasting, and publication collections.
Using the Reactome FIViz application in Cytoscape 3.6.0 software, interactions between genes belonging to the selected GO BPs were analyzed. Reactome FIViz allows to find pathways and patterns of networks related to cancer and other diseases. This application has access to the Reactome Functional Interaction (FI) network, a highly reliable, manually selected pathway based on functional interaction protein network covering over 60% of human proteins.

2.6. Reverse Transcription Quantitative PCR Analysis (RT-qPCR)

RT-qPCR was performed to confirm the results obtained with microarray analysis. From each analyzed heatmap, three genes were selected: those with the highest, lowest, and intermediate levels of expression. Subsequently, using three biological samples in triplicate, the changes in their expression were analyzed. Reverse transcription was performed according to the reagent protocol provided by the manufacturer—SABiosciences (Frederick, MD, USA; RT2 First Stand kit-330401), using a Verlerimer 96-well thermocycler. For each reaction, 1 µg of RNA transcript was used. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: Preincubation at 37 °C for 30 s; 3-step amplification (95 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 15 s) for 45 cycles; melting (95 °C for 60 s, 40 °C for 60 s, 70 °C for 1 s, 95 °C for 1 s); cooling at 37 °C for 30 s. Gene expression was analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCq method.
For real-time PCR, the 7900HT FAST PCR Real Time System (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), Master Mix RT2 SYBR® Green ROX ™ qPCR (Qiagen Sciences, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and sequence-specific primers were used (Table 1). Gene expression was calculated with relative quantification (RQ) method, using 3-phosphate glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase (GADPH), β-actin (ACTB), and hypoxanthine 1 phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT1) genes as the reference. The RT-qPCR primers were designed using Primer3Plus software (version 0.4.0; Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

To calculate the results and perform statistical analysis, the Bioconductor program (www.bioconductor.org) and R programming languages (version R 3.5.1; www.r-project.org) were used, with the analysis itself based on moderated t statistics from the Bayes’ empirical method. The p value was corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamin and Hochberg false detection index. p < 0.05 was considered as a statistically significant difference. To establish statistical significance of the enriched GO terms and KEGG paths, the DAVID database software (v.6.8; david.ncifcrf.gov) and Benjamini methods were used. Each GO term and KEGG pathway was considered significantly enriched if they contained at least 5 differentially expressed genes with p < 0.05. RT-q PCR statistical analysis was performed with the use of the Real Statistics Resource Pack for MS Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Cumulus Cells Morphology

During 30 days of in vitro culture, morphological and potential phenotypic changes in cumulus cells were examined using a light microscope. Figure 1 presents the morphology of CC at individual time intervals of the primary in vitro culture. Changes in the morphology of CCs were observed at individual time intervals. CCs changed their shape from star-like to slightly elongated, spindle-like during primary in vitro culture. It was observed that CCs adhered very quickly to the flask bottom, just a few hours after transfer to the culture plate.

3.2. Profile of Gene Expression

Whole transcriptome profiling by Affymetrix microarray allowed us to analyze gene expression changes between 1 and the 7, 15, and 30 days of human CCs in vitro primary culture. Using human HgU 219 microarray, we examined expression of 49385 transcripts. Genes regarded as differentially expressed presented fold change higher than abs (2) and corrected p-value lower than 0.05 and consisted of 2169 different transcripts. All analyzed microarray data is available in the GEO database [30].
To retrieve gene ontology biological process terms (GO BP) containing differently expressed transcripts, the DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery) software was used. All up- and down-regulated genes were subjected to the DAVID search tool individually, with genes complying with previously defined criteria (adj. p-value < 0.05) selected. The analysis resulted in revealing differently expressed genes belonging to 657 GO BPs. The present paper focuses on 133 genes included in “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. In the Supplementary Table S1, the expression of all 133 genes are presented. Table 2 summarizes gene symbols (only 16 genes with the largest change in expression), Entrez gene IDs, fold changes in expression ratio, corrected p-values, and mean value of fold change ratio of studied genes.
Among genes with in-culture decrease in expression, in the case of the SFRP5, HMGCR, HMGB1, and ZC3H8 genes, uniform decrease was measured on 7, 15, and 30 days, when compared, which was made in 24 h culture as noted. In the case of HMGCR and ARF6, their even expression decrease was noted on days 7 and 15. On the 30th day, their decline in expression was at a lower level. In the case of genes in which an increase in expression was observed, NLRP, TLE1, COL3A1, SFRP4, and TNFRSF1B showed steady increase in subsequent measurements on day 7, 15, and 30. In the case of the COL3A1, compared to the measurement from day 7, in the last two weeks of the CCs culture there was a five-fold increase in expression of this gene. ITSN1 expression was highest on 7th day of culture. In turn, CTGF and VCAM genes showed the highest increase in expression during second week of cultivation. After first week, STK17A and HTR2B genes showed an increase in expression in comparison to the measurement from the first day. Then, their expression on day 15 was lower, increasing again on day 30. It should be added that for the HTR2B gene the increase in expression measured on day 30 was ten times higher than that recorded on day 15. Discussed gene expression level changes on individual days of culture are listed in Table 1.
The 15 genes with the highest expression change were marked on each heatmap in Figure 2.
Next, the enrichment of each GO BP term was calculated as z-score and shown on the circle diagram (Figure 3).
The mean value of fold change ratio of each gene between days 1 and 7, 15, and 30 of culture was calculated to identify the most up and down-regulated genes. As a result, we obtained 10 up- and 6 down-regulated genes subjected to further analysis.
Furthermore, to show genes of one GO BP belonging to other categories, their intersections were presented as circle plot (Figure 4), heatmap (Figure 5) as well as a circular dendrogram (Figure 6).
In the next step, we applied STRING prediction method to generate interaction network among differentially expressed genes of selected GO BPs. Figure 7 presents molecular interaction network formed between protein products of studied genes. Finally, we applied REACTOME FIViz app to Cytoscape 3.6.0 software to investigate the functional interactions between genes of interest and introduced the results in Figure 8.
In addition, PCA (Principal Component Analysis) analyzes (Figure 9) were performed to illustrate the correlation between samples.

3.3. Validation of Gene Expression

The RT-qPCR method was applied in order to quantitatively validate the microarray results. Bar graph (Figure 10) presents validation results.
In the majority of the 16 selected genes, the analysis confirmed the character of expression. As can be seen in most cases, differences do not affect the direction of gene expression. However, as in the case of ITSN1 and ZC3H8 genes, some expression pattern disturbances can be observed in one of the analyzed time periods. In such situations, the RT-qPCR result is usually considered more representative, as this method targets the specific sequences with much larger quantitative precision, as opposed to whole transcriptome analysis provided by microarrays. This approach has been also used in the current study, as the difference in sensitivity of the methods can sometimes vary.

4. Discussion

During folliculogenesis, the oocyte develops in the presence of cumulus somatic cells (CCs), which support the physiological maturity and capacity to become fertilized [31]. Before folliculogenesis, one of the main CC functions is cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production, which is transported through gap junctions (GJs) to the oocyte, inhibiting phosphodiesterase 3A (PDE3A) synthesis. It prevents the hydrolysis of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which is important for maintaining oocyte immaturity at prophase I until recruitment for the process of maturation [32]. CCs are responsible for oocyte contact with the external environment by providing most of the energy substrates. Thus, oocyte competence and ability for further development is mainly dependent on CC regulation [33]. It has been suggested that cumulus cells can maintain their physiological functions and support nuclear and cytoplasmic oocyte maturation for a long time due to their low DNA fragmentation index (DFI) [34]. Decrease in CC apoptosis may result from different survival pathway activation, improving the oocyte quality [35]. Expression of oocyte and CC genes can be altered by changes in their cell cycle and metabolism or induction of apoptosis [36]. Several pro- and anti-apoptotic genes, such as BCLAF1 and XAF1, have been already identified that play an important role in the follicle’s survival, atresia, and apoptosis [37,38].
During gene expression analysis of human ovarian CCs from long-term cultures, particular attention was paid to genes belonging to “Cell death”, “Programmed cell death”, “Regulation of cell death”, “Positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “Positive regulation of cell death”, “Extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, “Negative regulation of cell death”, “Negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “Aging” ontology groups. Day 30 of cell culture allows us to understand CCs’ properties in in vitro conditions. Day 1 (24 h) analysis corresponds approximately to this cells’ physiological properties, while the following days show the changes that occur in CCs.
The best-known form of PCD in animals is apoptosis. It is characterized by many morphological and biochemical features, which include: cell shrinkage, resulting in mitochondria structure and function damage, cytoplasm contraction, chromatin condensation, and marginalization in the nucleus, as well as DNA and nucleus fragmentation. These processes occur simultaneously, maintaining the integrity of the cell membrane and leading to formation of characteristic bubble-like protrusions described as apoptotic bodies. Cell fragmentation with their formation is the final stage of apoptosis [5,6,13]. In the presented research, CC changed their shape from star-like to slightly elongated, spindle-like during primary in vitro culture. Moreover, it was observed that CCs adhered very quickly to the culture plate bottom. The adhesion of cells to the bottom was observed just a few hours after transfer to the culture plate.
Recent studies show that the expression of genes associated with the process of apoptosis in cumulus cells increases with woman’s age [39,40]. Our study population included patients in the age range comparable to the (younger) group of women in the research presented by Moffatt et al. [39]. These authors noted that a higher expression of apoptotic markers (Fas and TIAR) in CCs of older women may have a detrimental effect on cumulus functionality. These studies also showed a higher level of DNA fragmentation of cumulus cells in the group over 38 years of age. In more recent research, Al-Edani et al. [41] presented an analysis of gene expression in cumulus cells in relation to female age in three categories (below 30, between 31 and 34, and above 37 years of age) demonstrating upregulation of genes associated with angiogenesis in older women. Authors speculated that augmentation of angiogenesis may be a compensatory mechanism to alleviate the deleterious effect of aging and subsequent hypoxia [41].
To assess the level of gene expression, total RNA from primary CCs culture on 1, 7, 15, and 30 days of culture was isolated. From over 133 genes subjected to expression analysis and belonging to the above ontological groups, three gene groups were selected for further study. The first contained SFRP5, HMGCR, HMGB1, ZC3H8, ARF6, and RHBDD1 genes whose expression decreased during culture. The second contained NLRP1, ITSN1, STK17A, and TLE1 genes, classified as having the lowest increase in expression. Finally, the last group included genes with the highest increase in expression during culture, which were COL3A1, SFRP4, CTGF, HTR2B, VCAM1, TNFRSF11B genes. Analysis of biological interactions between genes showed that none of these 16 analyzed genes belonged to the “Extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway” ontology group.
Among the analyzed genes, the TNFRSF11B (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11b) had the highest increase in expression. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the receptor TNF superfamily and its main role is cell death regulation. This protein can be secreted by osteoblasts, and acts as a negative regulator of bone resorption. Studies in mice have indicated its important role in lymph node organogenesis and vascular calcification [42]. Microarray analysis in mouse ovarian granulosa cell tumors (GCT) revealed the ectopic expression of TNFRSF11B as a bone marker [43].
The second most up-regulated gene is VCAM1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1). In endothelium, activated by cytokines, expression of this gene leads to the production of sialoglycoproteins. Expression of this gene is most often associated with activation of immune responses during inflammation in endothelial cells [44]. VCAM1 is an interstitial progenitor testis cells marker and is present at high levels in adult Leydig cells [45]. In theca cells, increase in VCAM1 expression is preceded by activation of the androgen receptor which indirectly results in change of the expression and/or activity of the NR2F2 (nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 2) gene. In mice, this series of reactions prevents androgenization of the ovaries [45]. To date, expression of TNFRSF11B and VCAM1 genes in human cumulus cells has not yet been analyzed.
HTR2B also known as 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor 2B encodes one of several types of serotonin receptors. These receptors are thought to be involved in the development of prostate cancer. Serotonin receptors expression has been shown to occur in healthy ovaries as well as in ovarian tumors, indicating its role in both physiological and pathological conditions [46]. To date, there are few reports describing this receptor’s activity in ovarian tissue. Kannisto et al. for the first time presented the importance of 5-HT receptors in bovine ovaries [47]. The first report about 5-HT expression in mammalian oocytes and cumulus cells were presented by Dubé et al. [48]. 5-HT2B receptor, was identified for the first time in mouse cumulus cells [49]. CCs by expressing TPH1 (tryptophan-1 hydroxylase) induce synthesis of HTRB2 ligand—5-HT, which together with other receptors located on the CCs and oocytes surface in the metaphase II (MII) stage triggers dynamic process of Ca2+ exchange between these cells. This interaction subsequently leads to effective two-way communication between oocyte and CCs. Given our results and strong HTR2B gene expression, this gene seems to be important for Ca2+ ion exchange between CCs and the oocyte. It should be emphasized that high concentration of Ca2+ ions also plays a major role in oocyte activation at the time of their fertilization [50,51].
CTGF, also known as CCN2 (cellular communication network factor 2), encodes a mitogen secreted by vascular endothelial cells. In ovarian tissue, CCN proteins are regulated by steroid hormones and their expression is dictated by oxygen concentration. CCN2 activity is essential for follicular development, ovulation, and corpus luteum formation, while its inhibition can lead to female infertility. Additionally, acting together with CCN1 and CCN3 by their activity compensation, CCN2 controls human trophoblast proliferation and migration [52]. The increase in CTGF gene expression during primary CCs culture observed in our study confirms results of Hillier et al., who similarly noticed increased CCN2 expression during follicular growth and its highest level in COCs [53]. In vivo, CTGF expression is inhibited by follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) increase [54]. Studies by Duncan et al. showed that CCN2 is more involved in luteolysis than in luteinization [55]. Given our current and previous results and the results of other researchers, it can be assumed that CCN2 plays a multidirectional role in recruiting primary follicles, their proper development, oocyte maturation, corpus luteum angiogenesis, and luteolysis.
The last two genes analyzed from the group of six with the highest expression are SFRP4 (secreted frizzled related protein 4) and COL3A1 (collagen type III alpha 1 chain). SFRP4 participates in modulation of Wnt signaling pathway. In human mural and cumulus granulosa cells, high levels of LH (luteinizing hormone) and hCG in the ovaries reduce their expansion and proliferation as follicles grow to the preovulatory stage. Additionally, it was noted that in CCs SFRP4 expression was higher than in mural GCs [56]. SFRP4 high level is maintained in corpus luteum (CL) confirming previous research describing targeted growth and differentiation of follicular granulosa cells tended to form CL [1]. The role of the SFRP4 gene in rat CL apoptosis has not been fully determined [57]. Zamberlam et al. for the first time reported that SFRP4 in the presence of gonadotropins negatively regulates the response of ovarian follicles, limiting their development, ovulation, and female fertility [58]. Treatment of human ovaries with recombinant FSH (rFSH) gonadotropin promotes COL3A1 expression in CCs, which is important for cellular assembly and organization [59].
During CCs’ primary cultivation, the lowest level of increased expression was found in NLRP1 (NLR family pyrin domain containing 1), ITSN1 (intersectin 1), STK17A (serine/threonine kinase 17a), and TLE1 (TLE family member 1, transcriptional corepressor) genes. The increase in expression of each of these genes was insignificant and on a similar level. NLRP1 encodes an apoptotic protein belonging to the Ced-4 family and is one of the key programmed cell death mediators. Increased expression of this gene characterizes cells entering the apoptosis pathway. The NLRP gene plays a key role in mammalian reproduction. In mice, NLRP transcripts are required for successful oocyte development after fertilization [60]. Continuing, ITSN1 participates in mitogenesis and endocytosis regulation. Expression of these two genes in CCs has not yet been studied. The next of four considered genes is STK17A, presenting the apoptosis inducing activity. Increased STK17A expression stimulates cell proliferation. Using flow cytometry, an increased percentage of ovarian cancer cells in the G2/M phase was determined while in the G1 phase reduction of cells was observed. Additionally, in ovarian cancer cells, STK17A was found to be characteristic for a drug-resistance phenotype [61]. The last gene from this group—TLE1 is a specific biomarker of synovial sarcoma and subset of melanomas [62]. The importance and role of this gene in ovarian tissue has not been described. Taking into account minor changes of these genes’ expression and results of previous research, their low importance for cumulus cells can be presumed.
The last of the analyzed groups contains 6 out of all 133 genes whose expression was down-regulated. The most down-regulated gene was SFRP5 (secreted frizzled related protein 5), whose increased expression was noted in pancreas and retinal pigment epithelium. Unlike SFRP4, this gene expression was induced by LH/hCG in CCs and GCs in both in vivo and in vitro conditions [56]. Interestingly, these results indicate that the lack of LH/hCG supplementation in our long-term cultivation reflects the conditions of the initial stages of follicular growth where these hormones are not present. HMGCR (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase) is a crucial enzyme for cholesterol production. Its significance in ovaries was only considered in the context of ovarian cancer cell line response to cisplatin [63]. The next gene, HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1) encodes high mobility group-box superfamily protein member. This gene takes part in the cell differentiation and tumor cell migration processes. The role of HMGB1 in promoting apoptosis in some pathological processes has been proven [64]. The research of Xiao Rong et al. showed that this gene may be an ovarian GCs apoptosis extracellular inducer [65]. ARF6 (ADP ribosylation factor 6) is classified as a small GTPase that regulates endocytic membrane distribution and cytoskeleton organization. It localizes at the plasma membrane in the active GTP- and/or inactive GDP-bound form [66]. In GCs, ARF6 mRNA transcript concentration was shown to be increased in PCOS syndrome. Together with cytohesin2, this gene is involved in LHCGR activity induction [67]. The last two ZC3H8 (zinc finger CCCH-type containing 8) and RHBDD1 (rhomboid domain containing 1) genes have not been previously analyzed in the context of ovarian relevance.

5. Conclusions

The present study characterized gene expression profiles in cumulus cells during long-term (30 days) in vitro primary culture. All of the studied genes are involved in programmed cell death, especially the apoptosis processes, and belong to the nine ontology groups: cell death (GO:0008219), programmed cell death (GO:0012501), regulation of cell death (GO:0010941), positive regulation of apoptotic process (GO:0043065), positive regulation of cell death (GO:0010942), extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway (GO:0097191), negative regulation of cell death (GO:0060548), negative regulation of apoptotic process (GO:0043066), and aging (GO:0007568). Detailed analysis of 16 previously selected genes presenting differential expression level allowed us to bring closer the understanding CC aging and cell death. Measurement of gene expression at the first day of culture gives us a picture how expression patterns develop shortly after ovulation. It also enables to trace molecular mechanisms, which are important for CL formation. Among three of the analyzed gene groups, the one including genes with the highest increase in expression seems to be the most crucial for CCs’ functions. This group contains genes directly affecting the CC quality, and through their close communication network, probably indirectly affecting the oocyte. As presented, analyzed genes belong to ontological groups associated with aging and cell death, but it has to be kept in mind that in CCs and ovaries, they may be involved incompletely with distinct physiological functions. Considering the role of Ca2+ ions in achieving MII stage by the oocyte and its activation after fertilization, in-depth understanding of the function that this gene can play in CCs may be relevant to understanding of oocyte maturation mechanism. Additionally, Ca2+ ions play a key role in the oocyte activation during fertilization. Considering that apoptosis gene expression level changes with the age of the patient, it seems interesting for further research to study expression of CC genes responsible for planned cell death and aging in material obtained from patients of different age ranges. Finally, we have demonstrated that CC long-term in vitro culture is characterized by expression of markers that suggest their ability to differentiate towards corpus luteum cells. Our research can become the basis for creating a model of corpus luteum formation in laboratory conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/9/5/1265/s1, Table S1: List of the selected 133 genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.C. and B.K.; methodology, W.K. and K.J. (Karol Jopek); software, K.J. (Karol Jopek); validation, K.J. (Karol Jopek); formal analysis, J.B.-T. and M.J. (Michal Jeseta); investigation, W.K. and K.J. (Krzysztof Janowicz); resources, B.C.; data curation, J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, B.C.; writing—review and editing, J.B.-T. and G.H.; visualization, C.D., L.M. and M.J. (Małgorzata Józkowiak); supervision, P.M., L.P., and R.Z.S.; project administration, B.K.; funding acquisition, B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Centre, UMO-2018/31/B/NZ5/02475.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chermuła, B.; Brązert, M.; Iżycki, D.; Ciesiółka, S.; Kranc, W.; Celichowski, P.; Ożegowska, K.; Nawrocki, M.J.; Jankowski, M.; Jeseta, M.; et al. New Gene Markers of Angiogenesis and Blood Vessels Development in Porcine Ovarian Granulosa Cells during Short-Term Primary Culture In Vitro. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Faramarzi, A.; Khalili, M.A.; Jahromi, M.G. Is there any correlation between apoptotic genes expression in cumulus cells with embryo morphokinetics? Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 3663–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chermuła, B.; Brązert, M.; Jeseta, M.; Ożegowska, K.; Kocherova, I.; Jankowski, M.; Celichowski, P.; Sujka-Kordowska, P.; Konwerska, A.; Piotrowska-Kempisty, H.; et al. Transcriptomic Pattern of Genes Regulating Protein Response and Status of Mitochondrial Activity Are Related to Oocyte Maturational Competence—A Transcriptomic Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ribeiro, A.; Freitas, C.; Matos, L.; Gouveia, A.; Gomes, F.; Silva Carvalho, J.L.; Almeida, H. Age-related expression of TGF beta family receptors in human cumulus oophorus cells. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017, 34, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Biase, F.H.; Kimble, K.M. Functional signaling and gene regulatory networks between the oocyte and the surrounding cumulus cells. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Emanuelli, I.P.; Costa, C.B.; Rafagnin Marinho, L.S.; Seneda, M.M.; Meirelles, F.V. Cumulus-oocyte interactions and programmed cell death in bovine embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology 2019, 126, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Macaulay, A.D.; Gilbert, I.; Scantland, S.; Fournier, E.; Ashkar, F.; Bastien, A.; Saadi, H.A.S.; Gagné, D.; Sirard, M.-A.; Khandjian, É.W.; et al. Cumulus Cell Transcripts Transit to the Bovine Oocyte in Preparation for Maturation. Biol. Reprod. 2016, 94, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Macaulay, A.D.; Gilbert, I.; Caballero, J.; Barreto, R.; Fournier, E.; Tossou, P.; Sirard, M.-A.; Clarke, H.J.; Khandjian, É.W.; Richard, F.J.; et al. The gametic synapse: RNA transfer to the bovine oocyte. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 91, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kong, Q.-Q.; Wang, J.; Xiao, B.; Lin, F.-H.; Zhu, J.; Sun, G.-Y.; Luo, M.-J.; Tan, J.-H. Cumulus cell-released tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α promotes post-ovulatory aging of mouse oocytes. Aging (Albany. NY) 2018, 10, 1745–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Krysko, D.V.; Leybaert, L.; Vandenabeele, P.; D’Herde, K. Gap junctions and the propagation of cell survival and cell death signals. Apoptosis 2005, 10, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fuchs, Y.; Steller, H. Programmed Cell Death in Animal Development and Disease. Cell 2011, 147, 742–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Domínguez, F.; Cejudo, F.J. Programmed cell death (PCD): An essential process of cereal seed development and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Galluzzi, L.; Vitale, I.; Aaronson, S.A.; Abrams, J.M.; Adam, D.; Agostinis, P.; Alnemri, E.S.; Altucci, L.; Amelio, I.; Andrews, D.W.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 486–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhu, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Wang, T.Y.; Zhang, C.X.; Luo, M.J.; Tan, J.H. Cumulus cells accelerate oocyte aging by releasing soluble Fas Ligand in mice. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhu, J.; Lin, F.-H.; Zhang, J.; Lin, J.; Li, H.; Li, Y.-W.; Tan, X.-W.; Tan, J.-H. The signaling pathways by which the Fas/FasL system accelerates oocyte aging. Aging (Albany. NY) 2016, 8, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Celichowski, P.; Nawrocki, M.J.; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, M.; Jankowski, M.; Budna, J.; Bryja, A.; Kranc, W.; Borys, S.; Knap, S.; Ciesiółka, S.; et al. “Positive Regulation of RNA Metabolic Process” Ontology Group Highly Regulated in Porcine Oocytes Matured In Vitro: A Microarray Approach. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chamier-Gliszczyńska, A.; Brązert, M.; Sujka-Kordowska, P.; Popis, M.; Ożegowska, K.; Stefańska, K.; Kocherova, I.; Celichowski, P.; Kulus, M.; Bukowska, D.; et al. Genes involved in angiogenesis and circulatory system development are differentially expressed in porcine epithelial oviductal cells during long-term primary in vitro culture–a transcriptomic study. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 6, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kranc, W.; Brązert, M.; Ożegowska, K.; Budna-Tukan, J.; Celichowski, P.; Jankowski, M.; Bryja, A.; Nawrocki, M.J.; Popis, M.; Jeseta, M.; et al. Response to abiotic and organic substances stimulation belongs to ontologic groups significantly up-regulated in porcine immature oocytes. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 6, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dias, F.C.F.; Khan, M.I.R.; Sirard, M.A.; Adams, G.P.; Singh, J. Transcriptome analysis of granulosa cells after conventional vs long FSH-induced superstimulation in cattle. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nawrocki, M.J.; Celichowski, P.; Jankowski, M.; Kranc, W.; Bryja, A.; Borys-Wójcik, S.; Jeseta, M.; Antosik, P.; Bukowska, D.; Bruska, M.; et al. Ontology groups representing angiogenesis and blood vessels development are highly up-regulated during porcine oviductal epithelial cells long-term real-time proliferation – a primary cell culture approach. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 6, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chronowska, E. High-Throughput Analysis of Ovarian Granulosa Cell Transcriptome. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Chermuła, B.; Brązert, M.; Jeseta, M.; Ożegowska, K.; Sujka-Kordowska, P.; Konwerska, A.; Bryja, A.; Kranc, W.; Jankowski, M.; Nawrocki, M.J.; et al. The Unique Mechanisms of Cellular Proliferation, Migration and Apoptosis are Regulated through Oocyte Maturational Development-A Complete Transcriptomic and Histochemical Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 20, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Moncrieff, L.; Mozdziak, P.; Jeseta, M.; Machatkova, M.; Kranc, W. Ovarian follicular cells - living in the shadow of stemness cellular competence. J. Cell Boil. 2019, 7, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Stefańska, K.; Sibiak, R.; Hutchings, G.; Dompe, C.; Moncrieff, L.; Janowicz, K.; Jeseta, M.; Kempisty, B.; Machatkova, M.; Mozdziak, P. Evidence for existence of molecular stemness markers in porcine ovarian follicular granulosa cells. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 7, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kulus, M.; Józkowiak, M.; Kulus, J.; Popis, M.; Borowiec, B.; Stefańska, K.; Celichowski, P.; Nawrocki, M.J.; Bukowska, D.; Brüssow, K.P.; et al. “Cell Cycle Process”, “Cell Division” and “Cell Proliferation” Belong To Ontology Groups Highly Regulated During Long-Term Culture of Porcine Oviductal Epithelial Cells. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 7, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chamier-Gliszczyńska, A.; Kałuzna, S.; Stefańska, K.; Celichowski, P.; Antosik, P.; Bukowska, D.; Bruska, M.; Zakova, J.; Machatkova, M.; Jeseta, M.; et al. Analysis of expression of genes responsible for regulation of cellular proliferation and migration-Microarray approach based on porcine oocyte model. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 7, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chomczynski, P.; Sacchi, N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 162, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, D.; Sherman, B.T.; Tan, Q.; Collins, J.R.; Alvord, W.G.; Roayaei, J.; Stephens, R.; Baseler, M.W.; Lane, H.C.; Lempicki, R.A. The DAVID Gene Functional Classification Tool: A novel biological module-centric algorithm to functionally analyze large gene lists. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Walter, W.; Sánchez-Cabo, F.; Ricote, M. GOplot: An R package for visually combining expression data with functional analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2912–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. GEO Accession viewer. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE149033 (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  31. Rybska, M.; Knap, S.; Jankowsk, M.; Jeseta, M.; Bukowska, D.; Antosik, P.; Nowicki, M.; Zabel, M.; Kempisty, B.; Jaśkowski, J.M. Characteristic of factors influencing the proper course of folliculogenesis in mammals. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 6, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dumesic, D.A.; Meldrum, D.R.; Katz-Jaffe, M.G.; Krisher, R.L.; Schoolcraft, W.B. Oocyte environment: Follicular fluid and cumulus cells are critical for oocyte health. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 103, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ashkenazi, H.; Cao, X.; Motola, S.; Popliker, M.; Conti, M.; Tsafriri, A. Epidermal growth factor family members: Endogenous mediators of the ovulatory response. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ruvolo, G.; Bosco, L.; Pane, A.; Morici, G.; Cittadini, E.; Roccheri, M.C. Lower apoptosis rate in human cumulus cells after administration of recombinant luteinizing hormone to women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization procedures. Fertil. Steril. 2007, 87, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Bosco, L.; Chiarelli, R.; Roccheri, M.C.; Matranga, D.; Ruvolo, G. Relationship between apoptosis and survival molecules in human cumulus cells as markers of oocyte competence. Zygote 2017, 25, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wells, D.; Patrizio, P. Gene expression profiling of human oocytes at different maturational stages and after in vitro maturation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 198, 455-e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stefańska, K.; Józkowiak, M.; Antosik, P.; Bukowska, D.; Celichowski, P.; Bruska, M.; Nowicki, M.; Kempisty, B.; Zakova, J.; Machatkova, M.; et al. Genes regulating programmed cell death are significantly upregulated in porcine immature oocytes. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kulus, M.; Kulus, J.; Popis, M.; Borowiec, B.; Stefańska, K.; Celichowski, P.; Nawrocki, M.J.; Brüssow, K.P.; Kempisty, B.; Jeseta, M. ‘ Cell cycle ’ and ‘ cell death ’-related genes are differentially expressed during long–term in vitro real-time cultivation of porcine oviductal epithelial cells. Med. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 7, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Moffatt, O.; Drury, S.; Tomlinson, M.; Afnan, M.; Sakkas, D. The apoptotic profile of human cumulus cells changes with patient age and after exposure to sperm but not in relation to oocyte maturity. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 77, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nasr, M.S.M.; Khedr, E.G.E.; Mansour, A.M.A.; Sakr, A.E.I.; Rammah, A.M. Apoptosis in human cumulus cells (CCs) in relation to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016, 206, e169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Edani, T.; Assou, S.; Ferrières, A.; Bringer Deutsch, S.; Gala, A.; Lecellier, C.-H.; Aït-Ahmed, O.; Hamamah, S. Female Aging Alters Expression of Human Cumulus Cells Genes that Are Essential for Oocyte Quality. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Stolina, M.; Dwyer, D.; Ominsky, M.S.; Corbin, T.; Van, G.; Bolon, B.; Sarosi, I.; McCabe, J.; Zack, D.J.; Kostenuik, P. Continuous RANKL Inhibition in Osteoprotegerin Transgenic Mice and Rats Suppresses Bone Resorption without Impairing Lymphorganogenesis or Functional Immune Responses. J. Immunol. 2007, 11, 7497–7505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Boerboom, D.; White, L.D.; Dalle, S.; Courty, J.; Richards, J.A.S. Dominant-stable β-catenin expression causes cell fate alterations and Wnt signaling antagonist expression in a murine granulosa cell tumor model. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 1964–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Osborn, L.; Hession, C.; Tizard, R.; Vassallo, C.; Luhowskyj, S.; Chi-Rosso, G.; Lobb, R. Direct expression cloning of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, a cytokine-induced endothelial protein that binds to lymphocytes. Cell 1989, 59, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Candelaria, N.R.; Padmanabhan, A.; Stossi, F.; Cecilia Ljungberg, M.; Shelly, K.E.; Pew, B.K.; Solis, M.; Rossano, A.M.; McAllister, J.M.; Wu, S.; et al. VCAM1 is induced in ovarian theca and stromal cells in a mouse model of androgen excess. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 1377–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Henriksen, R.; Dizeyi, N.; Abrahamsson, P.A. Expression of serotonin receptors 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT2B and 5-HT4 in ovary and in ovarian tumours. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 1361–1366. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Kannisto, P.; Owman, C.; Schmidt, G.; Sjöberg, N. O Characterization of presynaptic 5-HT receptors on adrenergic nerves supplying the bovine ovarian follicle. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1987, 92, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Dubé, F.; Amireault, P. Local serotonergic signaling in mammalian follicles, oocytes and early embryos. Life Sci. 2007, 81, 1627–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Amireault, P.; Dubé, F. Intracellular cAMP and calcium signaling by serotonin in mouse cumulus-oocyte complexes. Mol. Pharmacol. 2005, 68, 1678–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tesarik, J.; Sousa, M. More than 90% fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and artificial induction of oocyte activation with calcium ionophore. Fertil. Steril. 1995, 63, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Machaty, Z. Signal transduction in mammalian oocytes during fertilization. Cell Tissue Res. 2016, 363, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Winterhager, E.; Gellhaus, A. The role of the CCN family of proteins in female reproduction. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 2299–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Slee, R.B.; Hillier, S.G.; Largue, P.; Harlow, C.R.; Miele, G.; Clinton, M. Differentiation-dependent expression of connective tissue growth factor and lysyl oxidase messenger ribonucleic acids in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 2001, 142, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Harlow, C.R.; Bradshaw, A.C.; Rae, M.T.; Shearer, K.D.; Hillier, S.G. Oestrogen formation and connective tissue growth factor expression in rat granulosa cells. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 192, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Duncan, W.C.; Hillier, S.G.; Gay, E.; Bell, J.; Fraser, H.M. Connective tissue growth factor expression in the human corpus luteum: Paracrine regulation by human chorionic gonadotropin. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 5366–5376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maman, E.; Yung, Y.; Cohen, B.; Konopnicki, S.; Dal Canto, M.; Fadini, R.; Kanety, H.; Kedem, A.; Dor, J.; Hourvitz, A. Expression and regulation of sFRP family members in human granulosa cells. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 17, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Drake, J.M.; Friis, R.R.; Dharmarajan, A.M. The role of sFRP4, a secreted frizzled-related protein, in ovulation. Apoptosis 2003, 8, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zamberlam, G.; Lapointe, E.; Abedini, A.; Rico, C.; Godin, P.; Paquet, M.; DeMayo, F.J.; Boerboom, D. SFRP4 Is a Negative Regulator of Ovarian Follicle Development and Female Fertility. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 1561–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Assou, S.; Haouzi, D.; Dechaud, H.; Gala, A.; Ferrières, A.; Hamamah, S. Comparative gene expression profiling in human cumulus cells according to ovarian gonadotropin treatments. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 354582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Tong, Z.B.; Gold, L.; Pfeifer, K.E.; Dorward, H.; Lee, E.; Bondy, C.A.; Dean, J.; Nelson, L.M. Mater, a maternal effect gene required for early embryonic development in mice. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26, 267–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gao, J.; Liu, D.; Li, J.; Song, Q.; Wang, Q. Effect of STK17A on the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel and carboplatin. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Xiong, Y.; Dresser, K.; Cornejo, K.M. Frequent TLE1 Expression in Cutaneous Neoplasms. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2019, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zheng, L.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Jiang, F.; Yang, X.A. SREBP2 contributes to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kim, S.W.; Lim, C.M.; Kim, J.B.; Shin, J.H.; Lee, S.; Lee, M.; Lee, J.K. Extracellular HMGB1 released by NMDA treatment confers neuronal apoptosis via RAGE-p38 MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Neurotox. Res. 2011, 20, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ni, X.R.; Sun, Z.J.; Hu, G.H.; Wang, R.H. High concentration of insulin promotes apoptosis of primary cultured rat ovarian granulosa cells via its increase in extracellular hmgb1. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 22, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Donaldson, J.G.; Jackson, C.L. ARF family G proteins and their regulators: Roles in membrane transport, development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12, 362–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kanamarlapudi, V. Centaurin-α1 and KIF13B kinesin motor protein interaction in ARF6 signalling. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 1279–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Changes in cumulus cells (GCs) morphology during long-term in vitro primary culture at individual time intervals. 24H: first day of culture; D: day of culture; 10×, 20×: magnification.
Figure 1. Changes in cumulus cells (GCs) morphology during long-term in vitro primary culture at individual time intervals. 24H: first day of culture; D: day of culture; 10×, 20×: magnification.
Cells 09 01265 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap representation of differentially expressed genes belonging to the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” gene ontology biological process (GO BP) terms. Arbitrary signal intensity acquired from microarray analysis is represented by colors (green, higher; red, lower expression). Log2 signal intensity values for any single gene were resized to Row z-Score scale (from −2, the lowest expression to +2, the highest expression for single gene). The 15 genes most down-regulated and up-regulated genes are marked on each heatmap.
Figure 2. Heatmap representation of differentially expressed genes belonging to the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” gene ontology biological process (GO BP) terms. Arbitrary signal intensity acquired from microarray analysis is represented by colors (green, higher; red, lower expression). Log2 signal intensity values for any single gene were resized to Row z-Score scale (from −2, the lowest expression to +2, the highest expression for single gene). The 15 genes most down-regulated and up-regulated genes are marked on each heatmap.
Cells 09 01265 g002
Figure 3. The circle plot showing the differently expressed genes and z-score of the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The outer circle shows a scatter plot for each term of the fold change of the assigned genes. Green circles display up-regulation and red ones down-regulation. The inner circle shows the z-score of each GO BP term. The width of each bar corresponds to the number of genes within GO BP term and the color corresponds to the z-score.
Figure 3. The circle plot showing the differently expressed genes and z-score of the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The outer circle shows a scatter plot for each term of the fold change of the assigned genes. Green circles display up-regulation and red ones down-regulation. The inner circle shows the z-score of each GO BP term. The width of each bar corresponds to the number of genes within GO BP term and the color corresponds to the z-score.
Cells 09 01265 g003
Figure 4. The representation of the mutual relationship of differently expressed genes that belong to 16 chosen genes from “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The ribbons indicate which genes belong to which categories. The middle circle represents logarithm from fold change (LogFC) between D7/24 h, D15/24 h, and D30/24 h respectively. The color of each block corresponds to the LogFC of each gene (green—up-regulated, red—down-regulated). The genes were sorted by logFC from most to least changed gene.
Figure 4. The representation of the mutual relationship of differently expressed genes that belong to 16 chosen genes from “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The ribbons indicate which genes belong to which categories. The middle circle represents logarithm from fold change (LogFC) between D7/24 h, D15/24 h, and D30/24 h respectively. The color of each block corresponds to the LogFC of each gene (green—up-regulated, red—down-regulated). The genes were sorted by logFC from most to least changed gene.
Cells 09 01265 g004
Figure 5. Heatmap showing the gene occurrence between chosen 16 differently expressed genes that belong to “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The yellow color is associated with gene occurrence in the GO Term. The intensity of the color corresponds to the number of GO BP terms that each gene belongs to.
Figure 5. Heatmap showing the gene occurrence between chosen 16 differently expressed genes that belong to “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The yellow color is associated with gene occurrence in the GO Term. The intensity of the color corresponds to the number of GO BP terms that each gene belongs to.
Cells 09 01265 g005
Figure 6. The circular dendrogram of differentially expressed genes involved in “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, “extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The genes were clustered based on their logFC values.
Figure 6. The circular dendrogram of differentially expressed genes involved in “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, “extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The genes were clustered based on their logFC values.
Cells 09 01265 g006
Figure 7. STRING-generated interaction occurrence between 16 chosen differently expressed genes that belongs to the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The intensity of the edges reflects the strength of interaction score.
Figure 7. STRING-generated interaction occurrence between 16 chosen differently expressed genes that belongs to the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. The intensity of the edges reflects the strength of interaction score.
Cells 09 01265 g007
Figure 8. Functional interaction (FI) between 16 chosen differently expressed genes that belongs to the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. In the following figure, “–>” stands for activating/catalyzing, “—” for FIs extracted from complexes or inputs.
Figure 8. Functional interaction (FI) between 16 chosen differently expressed genes that belongs to the “cell death”, “programmed cell death”, “regulation of cell death”, “positive regulation of apoptotic process”, “positive regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of cell death”, “negative regulation of apoptotic process”, and “aging” GO BP terms. In the following figure, “–>” stands for activating/catalyzing, “—” for FIs extracted from complexes or inputs.
Cells 09 01265 g008
Figure 9. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot showing correlations between samples. Samples that are highly correlated cluster together.
Figure 9. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot showing correlations between samples. Samples that are highly correlated cluster together.
Cells 09 01265 g009
Figure 10. The results of the RT-qPCR validation of expression microarrays (log (FC)), presented as a bar graph. All of the presented sample means were deemed to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). D: day of culture; FC: fold change.
Figure 10. The results of the RT-qPCR validation of expression microarrays (log (FC)), presented as a bar graph. All of the presented sample means were deemed to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). D: day of culture; FC: fold change.
Cells 09 01265 g010
Table 1. Oligonucleotide sequences of primers used for RT-qPCR analysis: the primers of the 10 most up-regulated and 6 most down-regulated genes.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide sequences of primers used for RT-qPCR analysis: the primers of the 10 most up-regulated and 6 most down-regulated genes.
GenePrimer Sequences (5′-3′)Product Size (bp)
COL3A1F: GGGAACAACTTGATGGTGCT
R: CCTCCTTCAACAGCTTCCTG
173
SFRP4F: GCCTGGGACAGCCTATGTAA
R: TCTGTACCAAAGGGCAAACC
160
HTR2BF: GCCTTCTTCACACCTCTTGC
R: TGTCCTTTCGAGAACCATCC
199
VCAM1F: CAGACAGGAAGTCCCTGGAA
R: TTCTTGCAGCTTTGTGGATG
212
TNFRSF11BF: GGCAACACAGCTCACAAGAA
R: CTGGGTTTGCATGCCTTTAT
241
TLE1F: CGACAAGTCCATCAGCAGAA
R: CCCAGATCACCCAGAAAGAA
150
STK17AF: TGAATCTCCATTGGGTGACA
R: CCACATATCTGTTGCCATGC
154
ITSN1F: CTCAGGAAAGGGACAAGCAG
R: CTGGCTTAGCTGGTTCTTGG
198
NLRP1F: ATACTTCCCGAGGCATCCTT
R: TTGCTTGCCTTTCATCTGTG
160
RHBDD1F: AGCTCCTGCCTTAGTGTGGA
R: AGCAAATTGCAAGAGCAGGT
225
ARF6F: GGAAAAGGTGGAGTGGGTTT
R: GCACCAACAGGAGCCTACAT
245
ZC3H8F: CATGCTCCACTGACTCCTGA
R: CATCACCCCAGTCACACAAG
215
HMGB1F: ATATGGCAAAAGCGGACAAG
R: GCAACATCACCAATGGACAG
193
HMGCRF: GTCATTCCAGCCAAGGTTGT
R: GGGACCACTTGCTTCCATTA
228
SFRP5F: TGGAGCCCAGAAAAAGAAGA
R: GCAGGGGTAGGAGAACATGA
247
CTGFF: GGAAAAGATTCCCACCCAAT
R: TGCTCCTAAAGCCACACCTT
153
GAPDHF: TCAGCCGCATCTTCTTTTGC
R: ACGACCAAATCCGTTGACTC
90
ACTBF: AAAGACCTGTACGCCAACAC
R: CTCAGGAGGAGCAATGATCTTG
132
HPRTF: TGGCGTCGTGATTAGTGATG
F: ACATCTCGAGCAAGACGTTC
141
Table 2. Gene symbols of 16 genes with the largest change expression, Entrez gene IDs, fold change in expression ratio, corrected p-values, and mean value of fold change ratio of studied genes.
Table 2. Gene symbols of 16 genes with the largest change expression, Entrez gene IDs, fold change in expression ratio, corrected p-values, and mean value of fold change ratio of studied genes.
Gene SymbolEntrez Gene IDRatio
7 d/24 h
Ratio
15 d/24 h
Ratio
30 d/24 h
Adj. p-val. 7 d/24 hAdj. p-val. 15 d/24 hAdj. p-val. 30 d/24 hMean Ratio
SFRP56425−2.0637−3.24762−3.374780.0001113.10∙10−62.01∙10−6−2.89537
HMGCR3156−2.03271−3.09191−2.680857.50∙10−62.38∙10−74.42∙10−7−2.60182
HMGB13146−2.0542−2.26113−2.526556.96∙10−62.04∙10−66.84∙10−7−2.28063
ZC3H884524−2.02274−2.09189−2.548160.000220.0001142.06∙10−5−2.22093
ARF6382−2.04476−2.3896−2.16361.93∙10−53.58∙10−66.57∙10−6−2.19932
RHBDD184236−2.06542−2.02064−2.208729.65∙10−58.14∙10−53.17∙10−5−2.09826
NLRP1228611.1870271.4506963.2208240.1642840.006334.21∙10−61.952849
ITSN164533.0529421.9899492.0941116.63∙10−50.0009680.0005582.379001
STK17A92632.3165242.1186372.7403768.16∙10−61.15∙10−51.29∙10−62.391846
TLE170882.2917492.3588832.5555743.64∙10−61.98∙10−68.50∙10−72.402069
COL3A112812.99438611.3367756.743671.93∙10−69.27∙10−97.86∙10−1023.69161
SFRP4642422.184328.7754327.230465.34∙10−81.93∙10−81.44∙10−826.06339
CTGF149018.9748837.7244924.630153.75∙10−96.96∙10−107.86∙10−1027.10984
HTR2B335724.32715.36107252.869554.41∙10−81.50∙10−64.69∙10−927.51924
VCAM1741226.6864158.3925338.136333.75∙10−96.96∙10−107.86∙10−1041.07175
TNFRSF11B498228.1341957.62667105.31133.53∙10−86.38∙10−92.12∙10−963.69073

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chermuła, B.; Kranc, W.; Jopek, K.; Budna-Tukan, J.; Hutchings, G.; Dompe, C.; Moncrieff, L.; Janowicz, K.; Józkowiak, M.; Jeseta, M.; et al. Human Cumulus Cells in Long-Term In Vitro Culture Reflect Differential Expression Profile of Genes Responsible for Planned Cell Death and Aging—A Study of New Molecular Markers. Cells 2020, 9, 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051265

AMA Style

Chermuła B, Kranc W, Jopek K, Budna-Tukan J, Hutchings G, Dompe C, Moncrieff L, Janowicz K, Józkowiak M, Jeseta M, et al. Human Cumulus Cells in Long-Term In Vitro Culture Reflect Differential Expression Profile of Genes Responsible for Planned Cell Death and Aging—A Study of New Molecular Markers. Cells. 2020; 9(5):1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chermuła, Błażej, Wiesława Kranc, Karol Jopek, Joanna Budna-Tukan, Greg Hutchings, Claudia Dompe, Lisa Moncrieff, Krzysztof Janowicz, Małgorzata Józkowiak, Michal Jeseta, and et al. 2020. "Human Cumulus Cells in Long-Term In Vitro Culture Reflect Differential Expression Profile of Genes Responsible for Planned Cell Death and Aging—A Study of New Molecular Markers" Cells 9, no. 5: 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop