Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances and Future Perspectives of In Vivo Targeted Delivery of Genome-Editing Reagents to Germ cells, Embryos, and Fetuses in Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of Human CD38 Using Variable Lymphocyte Receptor (VLR) Tetramers
Previous Article in Journal
The Brain–Skin Connection and the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis: A Review with a Focus on the Serotonergic System
Previous Article in Special Issue
NK cells and CD38: Implication for (Immuno)Therapy in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 4
10.3390/cells9040802
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Many Facets of CD38 in Lymphoma: From Tumor–Microenvironment Cell Interactions to Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy

by
Eleonora Calabretta
1 and
Carmelo Carlo-Stella
1,2,*
1
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, 20089 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(4), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040802
Submission received: 13 February 2020 / Revised: 19 March 2020 / Accepted: 25 March 2020 / Published: 26 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CD38 and Disease: A Bi-Directional Cross-Talk between Pathology and Physiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The CD38 antigen is expressed in several hematological malignancies, and the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies Daratumumab and Isatuximab have an established role in the therapy of multiple myeloma. However, data on the therapeutic utility of CD38 targeting in other lymphoid malignancies are limited. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia, the prognostic significance of CD38 expression is well accepted, and preclinical studies on the use of Daratumumab in monotherapy or combination therapy have demonstrated considerable efficacy. In other lymphoproliferative disorders, preclinical and clinical data have not been as compelling; however, CD38 overexpression likely contributes to resistance to checkpoint inhibitors, prompting numerous clinical trials in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma to investigate whether blocking CD38 enhances the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, due to its widespread expression in hematological tumors, CD38 represents an attractive target for cellular therapies such as CAR-T cells. The present review discusses current knowledge of CD38 expression and its implications in various lymphoid malignancies. Furthermore, it addresses current and future therapeutic perspectives, with a particular emphasis on the significance of CD38 interaction with immune cells of the tumor microenvironment. Lastly, results of ongoing studies using anti-CD38 antibodies will be reviewed.

1. Introduction

The development of the anti-CD38 antibody Daratumumab has redefined the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma (MM), showing impressive anti-tumoral activity in one of the most insidious hematological malignancies [1,2,3,4,5]. Daratumumab, a first in class anti-CD38 antibody, is currently approved both as monotherapy and combination therapy for relapsed/refractory MM (r/r MM) and has shown remarkable activity also in the first-line setting, both for transplant eligible [6] and ineligible [7,8] patients. Currently, Isatuximab, a novel antibody targeting CD38, is in late-stage clinical development, and has shown encouraging responses in r/r MM [9,10,11].
CD38 was first identified in the 1980s in a pioneer study by Reinherz et al., aimed at detecting surface antigens of human lymphocytes using monoclonal antibodies [12], and was initially known as T10. CD38 is predominantly expressed by terminally differentiated plasma cells and their malignant counterpart, but can also be found on the surface of other mature immune cells, such as B cells, T cells, natural killer (NK) cells as well as myeloid cells at early and late stages of development [13]. However, multipotent hematopoietic stem cells lack its expression, suggesting that it is a lineage-defining marker.
CD38 is a multifunctional transmembrane type II glycoprotein, which retains enzymatic activity as well as acting as a receptor. Among its many enzymatic functions, CD38 is involved in the catabolism of intracellular nicotinamide dinucleotide (NAD+), in the metabolism of extracellular NAD+ precursors and is a major regulator of intracellular calcium homeostasis [14]. In particular, high levels of extracellular adenosine have an increasingly recognized role in cancer biology: it is implicated in promoting immunosuppression via binding to purinergic receptors (the CD38/CD203a/CD73 ectoenzymatic pathway), and may be exploited by T cells of the tumor microenvironment to mediate immune escape. Indeed activation of such pathway correlates with myeloma progression and disease aggressiveness [15,16]. Its receptor component regulates the CD31-mediated adhesion between leukocytes and the endothelial wall, therefore favoring activation and proliferation of leukocytes [13,17,18] and promoting B-cell differentiation.
Biologically, the role of CD38 is less defined, though many hypotheses have been proposed. Firstly, CD38 is thought to have a role in defense against infections: its metabolic functions may limit the availability of NAD+ for human pathogens who are obligate NAD+ consumers, but lack the ability to synthesize it [19]. Additionally, the accumulation of CD38+ inflammatory cells has been associated with aging [20]. Indeed, CD38 modulates the availability of NAD+ precursors, which are key players in cell senescence [21]. Finally, it has been suggested that CD38 found in seminal fluid plays a pivotal role in establishing feto-maternal tolerance, though the exact molecular mechanisms remain unknown [22].
Abnormal CD38 expression in hematologic malignancies correlates with cellular proliferation and disease progression, thus making CD38 an attractive target for antibody-based therapeutics. Additionally, its functions in immunomodulation and regulation of intracellular and extracellular metabolic pathways may be targeted to provide indirect anti-tumor activity. Though direct antibody-based targeting of CD38 is well known to produce deep and effective clinical responses in multiple myeloma, data on other lymphoid malignancies are limited.
In this review, we will summarize current knowledge of CD38 expression and its functions in various lymphoproliferative disorders, especially highlighting any therapeutic implications; additionally, we will focus on the emerging role in formation of tumor microenvironment and modulation of immune escape pathways, and, as a consequence, its clinical implications in the era of immunotherapy and cellular therapy.

2. Tumor Microenvironment Interactions: Where Does CD38 Stand?

The tumor microenvironment is vital for the development, persistence and progression of cancer, and its possible role as a therapeutic target has been matter of investigation in recent decades in a wide range of malignancies. Immune and non-immune cells cooperate to form a complex network of interactions and alter their activation status to promote tumor survival and dissemination, while evading immune surveillance. In this setting, CD38 expression is commonly found on many immunosuppressive cell types, including (i) regulatory T cells (T regs) (ii) regulatory B cells (B regs), (iii) myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and (iv) the CD16−CD56bright NK cell subset, whose importance in tumor—microenvironment interactions is being increasingly recognized.
Specifically, conventional CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells expressing high levels of CD38 have been shown to exert an augmented immunosuppressive activity [23,24]. The underlying mechanism remains unknown. However, CD31− Tregs display a deficient suppressive activity, suggesting that the recognized CD38-CD31 interaction may have a role in this enhanced activity [23]. Accordingly, high CD38 expressing regulatory B cells exhibit a potent immunosuppressive function: by increasing the production of interleukin-10 (IL-10), these cells inhibit T helper 1 and T helper 17 differentiation from naïve T cells, while favoring Treg production [25]. Indeed, deficient activity of Bregs, as identified by low CD38 expression, has been linked, in murine models, to development of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis [25,26]. Additionally, CD38 is a biomarker of MDSCs activity. MDSCs are a recently characterized heterogenous class of myeloid cells with strong immunosuppressive activity, which interact with tumor cells to promote angiogenesis, cancer cell invasion and dissemination [27,28,29,30]. CD38high MDSCs represent an immature form of MDSCs and are characterized by an increased capacity to suppress activated T cells, as a result of increased production of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). There is evidence that tumor-derived signals directly influence the level of CD38 expression on MDSCs, thus contributing directly to immune escape. Lastly, although classically regarded as cytotoxic anti-tumoral cells, considerable evidence indicates that the CD16−CD56bright NK cell subset may be involved in immune regulatory pathways, mainly through the production of anti-inflammatory molecules [31,32], thus depressing effector T-cell proliferation. Morandi and coworkers have recently demonstrated that such inhibitory activity may be related to increased adenosinergic secretion, likely linked to a CD38-dependent pathway [33] (Figure 1).
Collectively, these data suggest that the role of CD38 may go beyond metabolic, enzymatic, and proliferative functions. CD38 may be involved in the formation of a pro-tumoral microenvironment and in its maintenance. Indeed, targeting of CD38 with Daratumumab in MM depletes CD38+ MDSCs, Tregs and Bregs and restores cytotoxic T-cell activity [34]. Comparable results have been observed also with the novel anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody Isatuximab/SAR650984 [24].
Additionally, CD38+ inhibitory cells have also been identified in other malignancies, including esophageal cancer [35] and colorectal cancer [36], thus expanding their immune regulatory role to solid tumors.
In conclusion, these studies indicate that CD38 is crucial for cell-mediated immuno-modulatory functions and pro-tumoral interactions with components of the microenvironment, thus supporting the use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of hematological and non-hematological malignancies.

3. CD38 in Lymphoid Malignancies

3.1. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in adults. CLL is an atypical disease, as the vast majority of leukemic cells in the peripheral blood are in resting state. Proliferation occurs in the so-called “proliferation centers”, located in specific nodal, splenic and marrow niches [37]. The dynamic balance between proliferation stimuli and accumulation of indolent lymphocytes in the periphery determines disease course and aggressiveness, resulting in the highly heterogenous nature of this disease. Identification of markers that may correlate with more aggressive CLL cell subsets is therefore crucial to optimize therapeutical management. In this context, CD38 expression has been regarded as a potential marker of tumor proliferation; its expression fluctuates during the course of the disease and may be acquired or lost by CLL cells according to their proliferation status [38].
CD38 expression was first reported to be associated with an inferior CLL outcome by Damle et al. [39], and later confirmed by subsequent studies [40,41,42], independent of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgVH) gene mutational status. CD38 is expressed by approximately 27–46% of patients [42,43]. Levels may increase during the course of the disease, reflecting a switch to a more aggressive phenotype [41,44]; however, CD38 negative patients at diagnosis rarely develop CD38 positivity.
The adverse prognosis associated with CD38 expression is likely related to increased proliferation rate of tumor cells, which become more susceptible to accumulation of pathogenic genetic lesions. Indeed, CD38+ cells are present at higher density in the bone marrow and lymph node compartments [45], where interaction with activated T cells and vascular endothelium promotes tumor proliferation [38]. Accumulation in growth-prone lymphoid niches is driven by CD38 expressing neoplastic cells via numerous mechanisms: firstly, CD38 greatly induces the CXCL12-driven chemotaxis of CLL cells by establishing a complex with its receptor, CXCR4 [46]. Additionally, increased homing can be observed as a result of higher integrin-mediated adhesion to VCAM-1: CD38 physically juxtaposes CD49d (i.e., a subunit of integrin α4β1) to Vav-1, which potentiates its phosphorylation and thus the activation of the integrin signaling pathway [47]. Interestingly, high CD49d levels on neoplastic cells strongly correlate with poorer prognosis [48] and development of lymphadenopathy [49], independent of CD38 expression. Lastly, Mele et al., recently demonstrated that CD38 expressing CLL cells exhibit a calcium-mediated Rap1 GTPase activation [50], which is known to have a crucial role in leukocyte trafficking and homing [51], thus elucidating a possible molecular mechanism for the enhanced migration toward proliferation centers.
Investigations into the role of CD38 in CLL and why it correlates with a worse prognosis have provided a more refined insight into the interactions between malignant B cells and microenvironmental components of the “proliferation niche”, as well as uncovering the complex trafficking signals that attract leukemic cells toward the niche itself. Therapeutic implications are promising and will be discussed in detail in the next section.

3.2. Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), comprising approximately 7% of adult NHL in western countries [52]. Due to its aggressive and unpredictable clinical course, most patients are treated with intensive chemotherapy regimens, often including autologous stem cell transplantation. Despite the intensive treatment, virtually all patients ultimately relapse [53]. The approval of the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor Ibrutinib for relapsed/refractory patients [54] and the promising activity of the BCL-2 inhibitor Venetoclax [55] have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium. Nonetheless, prognosis remains poor [56].
CD38 expression is frequently found in MCL (approximately 90% of cases) [57] and correlates with nodal involvement and poorer prognosis [58,59]. Additionally, its expression has been implied in resistance to Bortezomib [60]. Collectively, these findings suggest that high CD38 expression promotes clonal B-cell accumulation, as occurs in CLL [61], and may, therefore, represent an attractive therapeutic target.

3.3. Follicular Lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent NHL. It is characterized by a remitting-relapsing clinical course, with excellent responses to chemoimmunotherapy alternated by phases of disease progression. In addition, approximately one third of patients develop histologic transformation to the more aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which is associated with a dismal outcome [62].
Abnormal expression of CD38 is present in approximately two-thirds of FL, though at a lower level compared to more aggressive NHL variants, probably reflecting the lower proliferative burden. Variable levels of expression of CD38 can be detected, however, do not appear to correlate with different histological grades [63].

3.4. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

DLBCL is the most common histological subtype of NHL, accounting for approximately 30% of all cases [64,65]. Approximately 60% of patients are cured by first-line therapy [66,67]; however, those patients who fail to respond to standard chemo-immunotherapy have a poor prognosis. Efforts have been made to identify predictors of poor response to therapy, and it is becoming increasingly appreciated that DLBCL is an extremely heterogenous disease in terms of clinical features, morphology, immunohistochemistry, and genetic defects. In particular, High-Grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), a new entity of the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms, is characterized by MYC and BCL2 or/and BCL6 rearrangements, and has a clinical aggressiveness [68], thus representing an unmet medical need.
CD38 is expressed at high levels in most cases of DLBCL, with an average of 80% positivity detected across various tumor specimens [69]. Alsuwaidan et al. have recently identified a highly specific association between the intensity of CD38 expression by flow cytometry (i.e., ‘bright’ or ‘very bright’) and the more aggressive DLBCL variants [70]. Additionally, Sueoka and coworkers have demonstrated that high CD38 expression is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in de novo DLBCL [71]. These findings support the idea that CD38 may reflect the proliferative activity of tumor cells, thus representing a suitable therapeutic target.

3.5. Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) represents approximately 10% of newly diagnosed lymphomas [72], and is one of the most common malignancies in young adults. It is considered unique among malignancies as it is characterized by a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment comprising the bulk of the tumor, whereas neoplastic cells account for only 1–2%. Within the rich inflammatory infiltrate, Tregs are among the most abundant cell types and actively inhibit the cytotoxic activity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Di Gaetano et al. have reported that these anergic CD4+CD26− T lymphocytes frequently expresses high levels of CD38 [73], thus supporting the idea that CD38 may be a powerful immune-modulatory molecule.

3.6. T-Cell Lymphoma

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) account for approximately 8–10% of lymphoid tumors [74] and are generally aggressive, though extremely heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation, histological subtypes and prognosis. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) are the most frequent subtypes and comprise approximately 30–40% of mature T-cell malignancies [75].
With the exception of the ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) subtype, nodal PTCLs are generally associated with a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival of approximately 30%. Standard therapy is based on the administration of CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone) or CHOP-like regimens and, when feasible, autologous stem cell transplantation; however, options are limited for relapsed disease. There is, therefore, increasing urgency to identify novel therapeutic targets. Recently, Zaja et al. documented that approximately 80% of AITL and 60% of PTCL-NOS express variable levels of CD38, respectively [76], thus providing a rationale for anti-CD38 antibodies in this setting.
Furthermore, CD38 is expressed by the majority of extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), nasal type, a rare and aggressive subtype of mature T- and natural killer cell lymphomas, commonly associated with Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infection. Approximately one-half of patients with newly diagnosed ENKTL fail to achieve disease control, and the prognosis in patients with relapsed or refractory disease remains dismal [77]. In this scenario, CD38 has been found to be an independent predictor of poor prognosis [78], and may be therefore targeted by antibody-based therapeutics [79].

4. Therapeutic Implications: Daratumumab as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Lymphoid Malignancies

In multiple myeloma, targeting CD38 is an established therapeutic approach using the human IgG1 monoclonal antibody Daratumumab. This molecule is known to induce cell death via numerous mechanisms, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [80], antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) [80], antibody-dependent cell phagocytosis (ADCP) [81], and apoptosis [82]. Furthermore, Daratumumab effectively targets CD38 expressing myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and regulatory T cells, which are known contributors to the formation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, thus promoting immune escape [34]. In general, Daratumumab is a well-tolerated drug, and its most significant side effects are limited to infusion reactions. Interestingly, it may interfere with disease monitoring by being inappropriately detected as endogenous M protein, although the new test Hydrashift 2/4 has mitigated this effect. Prolonged use of Daratumumab has not been associated with depletion of granulocytes, or significant anemia or thrombocytopenia. Conversely, natural killer (NK) cell counts are decreased, but without consequences in terms of increased susceptibility to viral infections [83]. Lastly, despite inhibiting many immunosuppressive cell types, there is no evidence that it may cause autoimmune phenomena. The relevance of CD38 as a biomarker of clinical aggressiveness in CLL is well known, and its role in tumor homing and proliferation has been elucidated in recent years [84].
Matas-Cespedes et al. have recently demonstrated that treatment with Daratumumab induces effective cell killing in CLL cell lines and mouse models via ADCC and ADCP, whereas CDC activity was negligible [85]. Additionally, Daratumumab inhibits malignant cell homing to the spleen in mice bearing CLL. Finally, it impedes adhesion to VCAM-1 by down-regulating matrix metalloproteinases, therefore inhibiting tumor infiltration and dissemination. Such findings were confirmed by Manna et al. [86], who also detected apoptosis when CLL cells were exposed to Daratumumab. The same research group also detected a CD38-mediated down-regulating of BTK, and demonstrated that accordingly, Daratumumab administration enhances Ibrutinib anti-tumoral activity.
Collectively these preclinical data demonstrate the rationale for investigating the activity of Daratumumab as monotherapy or combination therapy in CLL, especially for those patients who display adverse prognostic factors, such as 17p deletion and/or p53 mutation. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of Daratumumab in combination with Ibrutinib are currently recruiting patients (Clinicaltrials.gov).
Evidence of Daratumumab-mediated ADCC and ADCP was also demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo models of NHL (MCL, FL and DLBCL), independently of CD38 expression levels [87]. However, a phase II study assessing the activity of Daratumumab monotherapy in relapsed/refractory NHL failed to produce significant results, with only 8% of patients achieving a response (12.5% of FL and 6.7% of DLBCL) [69]. Although monotherapy with Daratumumab does not exhibit effective cytotoxic activity, combination therapy with standard regimens may enhance response rates. Indeed, Vidal-Crespo et al. have also shown that Daratumumab potentiates the effects of R-CHOP activity in preclinical models of FL, MCL and DLBCL [87]. Clinical studies are thus warranted to assess the benefit of this combination in patients affected by NHL.
Lastly, the report of striking efficacy of Daratumumab in a case of relapsed ENKL [79], has encouraged clinicians to assess its efficacy in a broader patient population. Huang and colleagues have recently disclosed data from a phase II study assessing the efficacy of Daratumumab monotherapy in r/r ENKL: among the 32 patients recruited in the study, the overall response rate was 25%, with a median duration of response of 55 days [88]. Interestingly, response to therapy was not associated with CD38 expression.
Table 1 summarizes currently available results and ongoing phase I/II clinical trials on the efficacy of anti-CD38 antibodies as monotherapy or combination therapy in lymphoid malignancies.

5. CD38 in the Era of Immunotherapy and Cellular Therapy

The development of novel pharmacological agents exploiting the activity of the adaptive immune system, i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, and the possibility of directly engineering T cells toward specific tumor antigens, i.e., chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells), has revolutionized the landscape of cancer therapy.
Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory receptor which is expressed, in physiological conditions, by activated T cells. Its ligands, PDL-1 and PDL-2, are present on the surface of antigen-presenting cells. Interaction between these two components results in inhibition of T-cell receptor signaling, which is necessary to blunt the activation of the immune system during inflammation [89]. Recent studies have also revealed that PD-1 signaling preferentially de-phosphorhylates and inhibits the co-stimulatory molecule CD28, which is presently considered to be the prominent mechanism of immune escape in the context of immune checkpoint inhibition [90]. However, many tumors overexpress PDL-1, thus depressing cytotoxic activity of tumor infiltrating T cells, and escaping immune surveillance. PD-1 inhibitors Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab have been developed with the intent of disrupting this ‘exhaustive’ pathway and exploiting the resulting enhanced immune activity for clinical benefit. Indeed, these antibodies have produced unprecedented responses in many malignancies, and have thus been approved for clinical use in advanced solid tumors and for relapsed/refractory (r/r) cHL [91]. Nonetheless, long-term disease control is rare, and most patients ultimately experience disease progression. In this scenario there is compelling urgency to identify potential mechanisms of resistance to checkpoint inhibitors.
Chen and colleagues have significantly contributed to expanding the knowledge in this field: they have detected up-regulation of CD38 in murine models of lung cancer and melanoma chronically exposed to PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors, independent of tumor histological type [92]. Up-regulated CD38 on neoplastic cells augments adenosine signaling, which in turn, suppresses CD8+ T-cell function, thus providing escape from the adaptive immune system, as had been previously reported by Morandi et al. in melanoma cells lines [93] (Figure 2). Furthermore, they also demonstrated that CD38 knock out tumors exhibit delayed growth when compared to CD38+ wild-type tumors in wild-type mice and that in tumor-bearing mice, combination of anti-CD38 antibody and anti-PDL-1 acts synergistically to suppress tumor growth and dissemination. These findings support the use of this combination in the clinical setting in the attempt to overcome resistance to checkpoint blockade, especially in those tumors where PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors are especially effective, such as r/r cHL or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) [94,95,96,97]. So far, this combination has been investigated in MM, where patient recruitment has been completed and final results are being elaborated (clinicaltrials.gov), and is currently being tested in HL/NHL (Table 1).
T-cell-mediated immunotherapy with a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) is novel form of adoptive cellular therapy, employing genetically engineered autologous T lymphocytes to target tumor-specific antigens in an HLA-independent fashion. As of 2019, two anti-CD19 CAR-T cell products, Yescarta and Kymriah, have been approved for use in relapsed/refractory NHL including DLBCL, PMBCL and transformed FL [98]. Overall response rates vary between 52% and 83%; however, at least 60% of the patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma relapse after anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. CD19 antigen loss represents one of the major mechanisms of immune escape, but in many cases CD19 positive relapses have been observed [99,100,101]. Thus, additional investigations are warranted to better understand mechanisms of relapse and identify strategies to overcome such mechanisms.
In this scenario, alternative targets may be useful to overcome escape strategies. As previously described, CD38 is widely expressed on B-cell lymphoma cells and committed precursors, while undetectable on multilineage stem cells, therefore limiting noxious effects on normal lymphogenesis. Thus, Mihara and his team developed an anti-CD38 CAR, and demonstrated that these CD38-specific T cells effectively eliminate B-NHL cells both in vivo and in vitro [102]. Such results were observed also in a subset of B-cell lymphoma cells expressing BMI-1 (B lymphoma Mo-MLV insertion region 1 homolog) and survivin, which are known negative prognostic factors and correlate with resistance to chemotherapy [103]. Furthermore, the same research unit recently demonstrated that anti-CD38-CAR-T cells can abrogate aggressive and chemo-resistant subtypes of DLBCL, such as double hit lymphoma (DHL) and double expressor lymphoma (DEL) cells. This finding is in agreement with the reported high expression of CD38 on aggressive subsets of DLBCL [70]. This therapeutic strategy can be further improved by administering a combination of anti-CD19-CAR-T cells with anti-CD38-CAR-T cells [104].
These findings provide the rationale to expand the use of anti-CD38 CAR-T cells, which is mainly being investigated in MM, to relapsed/refractory NHL. Specifically, anti-CD38 CAR-T cells may represent an effective salvage therapy for those patients who relapse after anti-CD19 CAR-T cells, or may be administered in combination with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells to improve response rates. Currently, this possibility is being investigated in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia lacking CD19 expression or after failure of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells (clinicaltrials.gov).
Lastly, recruiting cytotoxic T cells to malignant cells by means of bispecific antibodies directed toward cancer-associated antigens is a highly promising therapeutic for treating hematologic malignancies. Indeed, Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody targeting CD3 and CD19, was recently approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and to achieve minimal residual disease negativity in the first-line setting [105,106]. Anti-CD38/CD3 bispecific antibodies have not yet been clinically developed but have the potential to become curative options for multiple myeloma and other lymphoid malignancies, given the widespread expression of CD38 on malignant cells. Zuch de Zafra and coworkers have recently demonstrated considerable in vitro and in vivo activity of the novel anti-CD38/CD3 bispecific antibody AMG 424 against high and low CD38-expressing cells, such as those previously exposed to Daratumumab [107]. Clinical trials assessing the activity of such therapy in r/r MM are currently recruiting patients (NCT03309111, clinicaltrials.gov), and optimal results may extend their use to other lymphoid malignancies.

6. Concluding Remarks

The CD38-NAD+ signaling pathway seems to have a relevant role in the formation of a suppressive tumor microenvironment and promotes the activity of inhibitory cell types, such as MDSCs, Tregs, Bregs and certain subtypes of NK cells. Additionally, it appears to be an important driver of resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. CD38 cytotoxic antibodies can, therefore, exhibit direct on-tumor activity as well as indirect immunomodulatory anti-tumoral effects. They have been used to treat CD38 positive tumors, specifically MM, with considerable efficacy and a manageable toxicity profile. Substantial preclinical evidence supports their use also in CLL, both as monotherapy or combination therapy with novel agents, such as BTK inhibitors. On the contrary, other lymphoid malignancies appear to be less sensitive to anti-CD38 antibodies, with evidence of modest activity of single-agent Daratumumab in various types of NHL. Nonetheless, Daratumumab and newly developed anti-CD38 antibodies, such as Isatuximab, should not yet be discarded as therapeutic options: indeed, they may find application in combination with standard regimens to enhance cytotoxic response or with checkpoint inhibitors to overcome acquired resistance. Furthermore, anti-CD38 antibodies have yet to be investigated in T-cell lymphomas.
Lastly, CD38 is a widespread antigen which is present on the surface of activated B lymphocytes and may thus be used as the antigenic target for cellular therapies (i.e., CAR-T cells) not only in multiple myeloma but also in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Combination therapies with anti-CD19 CARs are especially promising.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lokhorst, H.M.; Plesner, T.; Laubach, J.P.; Nahi, H.; Gimsing, P.; Hansson, M.; Minnema, M.C.; Lassen, U.; Krejcik, J.; Palumbo, A.; et al. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1207–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lonial, S.; Weiss, B.M.; Usmani, S.Z.; Singhal, S.; Chari, A.; Bahlis, N.J.; Belch, A.; Krishnan, A.; Vescio, R.A.; Mateos, M.V.; et al. Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with treatment-refractory multiple myeloma (SIRIUS): An open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 1551–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Spencer, A.; Lentzsch, S.; Weisel, K.; Avet-Loiseau, H.; Mark, T.M.; Spicka, I.; Masszi, T.; Lauri, B.; Levin, M.D.; Bosi, A.; et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone. Haematologica 2018, 103, 2079–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dimopoulos, M.A.; San-Miguel, J.; Belch, A.; White, D.; Benboubker, L.; Cook, G.; Leiba, M.; Morton, J.; Ho, P.J.; Kim, K.; et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Haematologica 2018, 103, 2088–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Chari, A.; Suvannasankha, A.; Fay, J.W.; Arnulf, B.; Kaufman, J.L.; Ifthikharuddin, J.J.; Weiss, B.M.; Krishnan, A.; Lentzsch, S.; Comenzo, R.; et al. Daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 130, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moreau, P.; Attal, M.; Hulin, C.; Arnulf, B.; Belhadj, K.; Benboubker, L.; Béné, M.C.; Broijl, A.; Caillon, H.; Caillot, D.; et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019, 394, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mateos, M.V.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; Cavo, M.; Suzuki, K.; Jakubowiak, A.; Knop, S.; Doyen, C.; Lucio, P.; Nagy, Z.; Kaplan, P.; et al. Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Facon, T.; Kumar, S.; Plesner, T.; Orlowski, R.Z.; Moreau, P.; Bahlis, N.; Basu, S.; Nahi, H.; Hulin, C.; Quach, H.; et al. Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 2104–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mikhael, J.; Richardson, P.; Usmani, S.Z.; Raje, N.; Bensinger, W.; Karanes, C.; Campana, F.; Kanagavel, D.; Dubin, F.; Liu, Q.; et al. A phase 1b study of isatuximab plus pomalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2019, 134, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Martin, T.; Baz, R.; Benson, D.M.; Lendvai, N.; Wolf, J.; Munster, P.; Lesokhin, A.M.; Wack, C.; Charpentier, E.; Campana, F.; et al. A phase 1b study of isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 129, 3294–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Richardson, P.G.; Attal, M.; Campana, F.; Le-Guennec, S.; Hui, A.M.; Risse, M.L.; Corzo, K.; Anderson, K.C. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide/dexamethasone versus pomalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: ICARIA Phase III study design. Future Oncol. 2018, 14, 1035–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Reinherz, E.L.; Kung, P.C.; Goldstein, G.; Levey, R.H.; Schlossman, S.F. Discrete stages of human intrathymic differentiation: Analysis of normal thymocytes and leukemic lymphoblasts of T-cell lineage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 1588–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Cesano, A.; Visonneau, S.; Deaglio, S.; Malavasi, F.; Santoli, D. Role of CD38 and its ligand in the regulation of MHC-nonrestricted cytotoxic T cells. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 1106–1115. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Hogan, K.A.; Chini, C.C.S.; Chini, E.N. The Multi-faceted Ecto-enzyme CD38: Roles in Immunomodulation, Cancer, Aging, and Metabolic Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Horenstein, A.L.; Chillemi, A.; Zaccarello, G.; Bruzzone, S.; Quarona, V.; Zito, A.; Serra, S.; Malavasi, F. A CD38/CD203a/CD73 ectoenzymatic pathway independent of CD39 drives a novel adenosinergic loop in human T lymphocytes. Oncoimmunology 2013, 2, e26246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Horenstein, A.L.; Quarona, V.; Toscani, D.; Costa, F.; Chillemi, A.; Pistoia, V.; Giuliani, N.; Malavasi, F. Adenosine Generated in the Bone Marrow Niche through a CD38-Mediated Pathway Correlates with Progression of Human Myeloma. Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Deaglio, S.; Morra, M.; Mallone, R.; Ausiello, C.M.; Prager, E.; Garbarino, G.; Dianzani, U.; Stockinger, H.; Malavasi, F. Human CD38 (ADP-ribosyl cyclase) is a counter-receptor of CD31, an Ig superfamily member. J. Immunol. 1998, 160, 395–402. [Google Scholar]
  18. Deaglio, S.; Vaisitti, T.; Bergui, L.; Bonello, L.; Horenstein, A.L.; Tamagnone, L.; Boumsell, L.; Malavasi, F. CD38 and CD100 lead a network of surface receptors relaying positive signals for B-CLL growth and survival. Blood 2005, 105, 3042–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Matalonga, J.; Glaria, E.; Bresque, M.; Escande, C.; Carbó, J.M.; Kiefer, K.; Vicente, R.; León, T.E.; Beceiro, S.; Pascual-García, M.; et al. The Nuclear Receptor LXR Limits Bacterial Infection of Host Macrophages through a Mechanism that Impacts Cellular NAD Metabolism. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 1241–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Camacho-Pereira, J.; Tarragó, M.G.; Chini, C.C.S.; Nin, V.; Escande, C.; Warner, G.M.; Puranik, A.S.; Schoon, R.A.; Reid, J.M.; Galina, A.; et al. CD38 Dictates Age-Related NAD Decline and Mitochondrial Dysfunction through an SIRT3-Dependent Mechanism. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 1127–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gomes, A.P.; Price, N.L.; Ling, A.J.; Moslehi, J.J.; Montgomery, M.K.; Rajman, L.; White, J.P.; Teodoro, J.S.; Wrann, C.D.; Hubbard, B.P.; et al. Declining NAD(+) induces a pseudohypoxic state disrupting nuclear-mitochondrial communication during aging. Cell 2013, 155, 1624–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, B.J.; Choi, Y.M.; Rah, S.Y.; Park, D.R.; Park, S.A.; Chung, Y.J.; Park, S.M.; Park, J.K.; Jang, K.Y.; Kim, U.H. Seminal CD38 is a pivotal regulator for fetomaternal tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1559–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Patton, D.T.; Wilson, M.D.; Rowan, W.C.; Soond, D.R.; Okkenhaug, K. The PI3K p110δ regulates expression of CD38 on regulatory T cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Feng, X.; Zhang, L.; Acharya, C.; An, G.; Wen, K.; Qiu, L.; Munshi, N.C.; Tai, Y.T.; Anderson, K.C. Targeting CD38 Suppresses Induction and Function of T Regulatory Cells to Mitigate Immunosuppression in Multiple Myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4290–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Flores-Borja, F.; Bosma, A.; Ng, D.; Reddy, V.; Ehrenstein, M.R.; Isenberg, D.A.; Mauri, C. CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells maintain regulatory T cells while limiting TH1 and TH17 differentiation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 173ra123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Domínguez-Pantoja, M.; López-Herrera, G.; Romero-Ramírez, H.; Santos-Argumedo, L.; Chávez-Rueda, A.K.; Hernández-Cueto, Á.; Flores-Muñoz, M.; Rodríguez-Alba, J.C. CD38 protein deficiency induces autoimmune characteristics and its activation enhances IL-10 production by regulatory B cells. Scand. J. Immunol. 2018, 87, e12664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Coussens, L.M.; Tinkle, C.L.; Hanahan, D.; Werb, Z. MMP-9 supplied by bone marrow-derived cells contributes to skin carcinogenesis. Cell 2000, 103, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Houghton, A.M.; Rzymkiewicz, D.M.; Ji, H.; Gregory, A.D.; Egea, E.E.; Metz, H.E.; Stolz, D.B.; Land, S.R.; Marconcini, L.A.; Kliment, C.R.; et al. Neutrophil elastase-mediated degradation of IRS-1 accelerates lung tumor growth. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Galdiero, M.R.; Bonavita, E.; Barajon, I.; Garlanda, C.; Mantovani, A.; Jaillon, S. Tumor associated macrophages and neutrophils in cancer. Immunobiology 2013, 218, 1402–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tüting, T.; de Visser, K.E. CANCER. How neutrophils promote metastasis. Science 2016, 352, 145–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bielekova, B.; Catalfamo, M.; Reichert-Scrivner, S.; Packer, A.; Cerna, M.; Waldmann, T.A.; McFarland, H.; Henkart, P.A.; Martin, R. Regulatory CD56(bright) natural killer cells mediate immunomodulatory effects of IL-2Ralpha-targeted therapy (daclizumab) in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5941–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Fu, B.; Li, X.; Sun, R.; Tong, X.; Ling, B.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. Natural killer cells promote immune tolerance by regulating inflammatory TH17 cells at the human maternal-fetal interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E231–E240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Morandi, F.; Horenstein, A.L.; Chillemi, A.; Quarona, V.; Chiesa, S.; Imperatori, A.; Zanellato, S.; Mortara, L.; Gattorno, M.; Pistoia, V.; et al. CD56brightCD16- NK Cells Produce Adenosine through a CD38-Mediated Pathway and Act as Regulatory Cells Inhibiting Autologous CD4+ T Cell Proliferation. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Krejcik, J.; Casneuf, T.; Nijhof, I.S.; Verbist, B.; Bald, J.; Plesner, T.; Syed, K.; Liu, K.; van de Donk, N.W.; Weiss, B.M.; et al. Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune regulatory cells, promotes T-cell expansion, and skews T-cell repertoire in multiple myeloma. Blood 2016, 128, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Karakasheva, T.A.; Waldron, T.J.; Eruslanov, E.; Kim, S.B.; Lee, J.S.; O’Brien, S.; Hicks, P.D.; Basu, D.; Singhal, S.; Malavasi, F.; et al. CD38-Expressing Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Promote Tumor Growth in a Murine Model of Esophageal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 4074–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Karakasheva, T.A.; Dominguez, G.A.; Hashimoto, A.; Lin, E.W.; Chiu, C.; Sasser, K.; Lee, J.W.; Beatty, G.L.; Gabrilovich, D.I.; Rustgi, A.K. CD38+ M-MDSC expansion characterizes a subset of advanced colorectal cancer patients. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e97022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Schmid, C.; Isaacson, P.G. Proliferation centres in B-cell malignant lymphoma, lymphocytic (B-CLL): An immunophenotypic study. Histopathology 1994, 24, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Patten, P.E.; Buggins, A.G.; Richards, J.; Wotherspoon, A.; Salisbury, J.; Mufti, G.J.; Hamblin, T.J.; Devereux, S. CD38 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is regulated by the tumor microenvironment. Blood 2008, 111, 5173–5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Damle, R.N.; Wasil, T.; Fais, F.; Ghiotto, F.; Valetto, A.; Allen, S.L.; Buchbinder, A.; Budman, D.; Dittmar, K.; Kolitz, J.; et al. Ig V gene mutation status and CD38 expression as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1999, 94, 1840–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ghia, P.; Guida, G.; Stella, S.; Gottardi, D.; Geuna, M.; Strola, G.; Scielzo, C.; Caligaris-Cappio, F. The pattern of CD38 expression defines a distinct subset of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients at risk of disease progression. Blood 2003, 101, 1262–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hamblin, T.J.; Orchard, J.A.; Ibbotson, R.E.; Davis, Z.; Thomas, P.W.; Stevenson, F.K.; Oscier, D.G. CD38 expression and immunoglobulin variable region mutations are independent prognostic variables in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but CD38 expression may vary during the course of the disease. Blood 2002, 99, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ibrahim, S.; Keating, M.; Do, K.A.; O’Brien, S.; Huh, Y.O.; Jilani, I.; Lerner, S.; Kantarjian, H.M.; Albitar, M. CD38 expression as an important prognostic factor in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2001, 98, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Del Poeta, G.; Maurillo, L.; Venditti, A.; Buccisano, F.; Epiceno, A.M.; Capelli, G.; Tamburini, A.; Suppo, G.; Battaglia, A.; Del Principe, M.I.; et al. Clinical significance of CD38 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2001, 98, 2633–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Chang, C.C.; Cleveland, R.P. Conversion of CD38 and/or myeloid-associated marker expression status during the course of B-CLL: Association with a change to an aggressive clinical course. Blood 2002, 100, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Jaksic, O.; Paro, M.M.; Kardum Skelin, I.; Kusec, R.; Pejsa, V.; Jaksic, B. CD38 on B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells has higher expression in lymph nodes than in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Blood 2004, 103, 1968–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Vaisitti, T.; Aydin, S.; Rossi, D.; Cottino, F.; Bergui, L.; D’Arena, G.; Bonello, L.; Horenstein, A.L.; Brennan, P.; Pepper, C.; et al. CD38 increases CXCL12-mediated signals and homing of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leukemia 2010, 24, 958–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zucchetto, A.; Vaisitti, T.; Benedetti, D.; Tissino, E.; Bertagnolo, V.; Rossi, D.; Bomben, R.; Dal Bo, M.; Del Principe, M.I.; Gorgone, A.; et al. The CD49d/CD29 complex is physically and functionally associated with CD38 in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leukemia 2012, 26, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bulian, P.; Shanafelt, T.D.; Fegan, C.; Zucchetto, A.; Cro, L.; Nückel, H.; Baldini, L.; Kurtova, A.V.; Ferrajoli, A.; Burger, J.A.; et al. CD49d is the strongest flow cytometry-based predictor of overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Strati, P.; Parikh, S.A.; Chaffee, K.G.; Achenbach, S.J.; Slager, S.L.; Call, T.G.; Ding, W.; Jelinek, D.F.; Hanson, C.A.; Kay, N.E.; et al. CD49d associates with nodal presentation and subsequent development of lymphadenopathy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2017, 178, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mele, S.; Devereux, S.; Pepper, A.G.; Infante, E.; Ridley, A.J. Calcium-RasGRP2-Rap1 signaling mediates CD38-induced migration of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 1551–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Katagiri, K.; Hattori, M.; Minato, N.; Irie, S.; Takatsu, K.; Kinashi, T. Rap1 is a potent activation signal for leukocyte function-associated antigen 1 distinct from protein kinase C and phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 1956–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Smith, A.; Crouch, S.; Lax, S.; Li, J.; Painter, D.; Howell, D.; Patmore, R.; Jack, A.; Roman, E. Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004–2014: Sub-type analyses from the UK’s Haematological Malignancy Research Network. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Dreyling, M.; Campo, E.; Hermine, O.; Jerkeman, M.; Le Gouill, S.; Rule, S.; Shpilberg, O.; Walewski, J.; Ladetto, M.; Committee, E.G. Newly diagnosed and relapsed mantle cell lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, iv62–iv71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, M.L.; Rule, S.; Martin, P.; Goy, A.; Auer, R.; Kahl, B.S.; Jurczak, W.; Advani, R.H.; Romaguera, J.E.; Williams, M.E.; et al. Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tam, C.S.; Anderson, M.A.; Pott, C.; Agarwal, R.; Handunnetti, S.; Hicks, R.J.; Burbury, K.; Turner, G.; Di Iulio, J.; Bressel, M.; et al. Ibrutinib plus Venetoclax for the Treatment of Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1211–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maddocks, K. Update on mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 1647–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Espinet, B.; Ferrer, A.; Bellosillo, B.; Nonell, L.; Salar, A.; Fernández-Rodríguez, C.; Puigdecanet, E.; Gimeno, J.; Garcia-Garcia, M.; Vela, M.C.; et al. Distinction between asymptomatic monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis with cyclin D1 overexpression and mantle cell lymphoma: From molecular profiling to flow cytometry. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 1007–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Orchard, J.; Garand, R.; Davis, Z.; Babbage, G.; Sahota, S.; Matutes, E.; Catovsky, D.; Thomas, P.W.; Avet-Loiseau, H.; Oscier, D. A subset of t(11;14) lymphoma with mantle cell features displays mutated IgVH genes and includes patients with good prognosis, nonnodal disease. Blood 2003, 101, 4975–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Camacho, F.I.; Algara, P.; Rodríguez, A.; Ruíz-Ballesteros, E.; Mollejo, M.; Martínez, N.; Martínez-Climent, J.A.; González, M.; Mateo, M.; Caleo, A.; et al. Molecular heterogeneity in MCL defined by the use of specific VH genes and the frequency of somatic mutations. Blood 2003, 101, 4042–4046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Pérez-Galán, P.; Mora-Jensen, H.; Weniger, M.A.; Shaffer, A.L.; Rizzatti, E.G.; Chapman, C.M.; Mo, C.C.; Stennett, L.S.; Rader, C.; Liu, P.; et al. Bortezomib resistance in mantle cell lymphoma is associated with plasmacytic differentiation. Blood 2011, 117, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zucchetto, A.; Benedetti, D.; Tripodo, C.; Bomben, R.; Dal Bo, M.; Marconi, D.; Bossi, F.; Lorenzon, D.; Degan, M.; Rossi, F.M.; et al. CD38/CD31, the CCL3 and CCL4 chemokines, and CD49d/vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 are interchained by sequential events sustaining chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell survival. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 4001–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Lossos, I.S.; Gascoyne, R.D. Transformation of follicular lymphoma. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2011, 24, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Mantei, K.; Wood, B.L. Flow cytometric evaluation of CD38 expression assists in distinguishing follicular hyperplasia from follicular lymphoma. Cytom. B Clin. Cytom. 2009, 76, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Van Leeuwen, M.T.; Turner, J.J.; Joske, D.J.; Falster, M.O.; Srasuebkul, P.; Meagher, N.S.; Grulich, A.E.; Giles, G.G.; Vajdic, C.M. Lymphoid neoplasm incidence by WHO subtype in Australia 1982–2006. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 2146–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Pfreundschuh, M.; Trümper, L.; Osterborg, A.; Pettengell, R.; Trneny, M.; Imrie, K.; Ma, D.; Gill, D.; Walewski, J.; Zinzani, P.L.; et al. CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: A randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Coiffier, B.; Thieblemont, C.; Van Den Neste, E.; Lepeu, G.; Plantier, I.; Castaigne, S.; Lefort, S.; Marit, G.; Macro, M.; Sebban, C.; et al. Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: A study by the Groupe d’Etudes des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. Blood 2010, 116, 2040–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rosenthal, A.; Younes, A. High grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6: Double hit and triple hit lymphomas and double expressing lymphoma. Blood Rev. 2017, 31, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Salles, G.; Gopal, A.K.; Minnema, M.C.; Wakamiya, K.; Feng, H.; Schecter, J.M.; Wang, M. Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, and Follicular Lymphoma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019, 19, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alsuwaidan, A.; Pirruccello, E.; Jaso, J.; Koduru, P.; Garcia, R.; Krueger, J.; Doucet, M.; Chaudhry, R.; Fuda, F.; Chen, W. Bright CD38 Expression by Flow Cytometric Analysis Is a Biomarker for Double/Triple Hit Lymphomas with a Moderate Sensitivity and High Specificity. Cytom. B Clin. Cytom. 2019, 96, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sueoka, K.; Yabushito, T.; Maruota, H.; Shimomura, Y.; ONO, Y.; Hiramoto, N.; Yoshioka, S.; Yonetoni, N.; Matushita, A.; Hasmimoto, H.; et al. The High Expression of CD38 is Associated with Poor Prognosis in de Novo Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. Available online: https://library.ehaweb.org/eha/2018/stockholm/214759/kaoru.sueoka.the.high.expression.of.cd38.is.associated.with.poor.prognosis.in.html?f=media=1*listing=3*browseby=8 (accessed on 20 March 2020).
  72. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Di Gaetano, R.; Gasparetto, V.; Padoan, A.; Callegari, B.; Candiotto, L.; Sanzari, M.C.; Scapinello, A.; Tagariello, G. Flow cytometry CD4(+)CD26(-)CD38(+) lymphocyte subset in the microenvironment of Hodgkin lymphoma-affected lymph nodes. Ann. Hematol. 2014, 93, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vose, J.; Armitage, J.; Weisenburger, D.; Project, I.T.-C.L. International peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma study: Pathology findings and clinical outcomes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 4124–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Swerdlow, S.H.; Campo, E.; Pileri, S.A.; Harris, N.L.; Stein, H.; Siebert, R.; Advani, R.; Ghielmini, M.; Salles, G.A.; Zelenetz, A.D.; et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 2016, 127, 2375–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zaja, F.; Tabanelli, V.; Agostinelli, C.; Calleri, A.; Chiappella, A.; Varettoni, M.; Luigi Zinzani, P.; Volpetti, S.; Sabattini, E.; Fanin, R.; et al. CD38, BCL-2, PD-1, and PD-1L expression in nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma: Possible biomarkers for novel targeted therapies? Am. J. Hematol. 2017, 92, E1–E2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Lim, S.H.; Hong, J.Y.; Lim, S.T.; Hong, H.; Arnoud, J.; Zhao, W.; Yoon, D.H.; Tang, T.; Cho, J.; Park, S.; et al. Beyond first-line non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: Clinical outcome and current perspectives on salvage therapy for patients after first relapse and progression of disease. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 2199–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Li, P.F.; Lu, Y.; Xia, Z.J.; Huang, H.Q.; Zhang, Y.J. CD38 expression predicts poor prognosis and might be a potential therapy target in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type. Ann. Hematol. 2015, 94, 1381–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hari, P.; Raj, R.V.; Olteanu, H. Targeting CD38 in Refractory Extranodal Natural Killer Cell-T-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1501–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. De Weers, M.; Tai, Y.T.; van der Veer, M.S.; Bakker, J.M.; Vink, T.; Jacobs, D.C.; Oomen, L.A.; Peipp, M.; Valerius, T.; Slootstra, J.W.; et al. Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 1840–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Overdijk, M.B.; Verploegen, S.; Bögels, M.; van Egmond, M.; Lammerts van Bueren, J.J.; Mutis, T.; Groen, R.W.; Breij, E.; Martens, A.C.; Bleeker, W.K.; et al. Antibody-mediated phagocytosis contributes to the anti-tumor activity of the therapeutic antibody daratumumab in lymphoma and multiple myeloma. MAbs 2015, 7, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Overdijk, M.B.; Jansen, J.H.; Nederend, M.; Lammerts van Bueren, J.J.; Groen, R.W.; Parren, P.W.; Leusen, J.H.; Boross, P. The Therapeutic CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Daratumumab Induces Programmed Cell Death via Fcγ Receptor-Mediated Cross-Linking. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Casneuf, T.; Xu, X.S.; Adams, H.C.; Axel, A.E.; Chiu, C.; Khan, I.; Ahmadi, T.; Yan, X.; Lonial, S.; Plesner, T.; et al. Effects of daratumumab on natural killer cells and impact on clinical outcomes in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2017, 1, 2105–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Malavasi, F.; Deaglio, S.; Damle, R.; Cutrona, G.; Ferrarini, M.; Chiorazzi, N. CD38 and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A decade later. Blood 2011, 118, 3470–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Matas-Céspedes, A.; Vidal-Crespo, A.; Rodriguez, V.; Villamor, N.; Delgado, J.; Giné, E.; Roca-Ho, H.; Menéndez, P.; Campo, E.; López-Guillermo, A.; et al. The Human CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Daratumumab Shows Antitumor Activity and Hampers Leukemia-Microenvironment Interactions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 1493–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Manna, A.; Aulakh, S.; Jani, P.; Ahmed, S.; Akhtar, S.; Coignet, M.; Heckman, M.; Meghji, Z.; Bhatia, K.; Sharma, A.; et al. Targeting CD38 Enhances the Antileukemic Activity of Ibrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 3974–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Vidal-Crespo, A.; Matas-Céspedes, A.; Rodriguez, V.; Rossi, C.; Valero, J.G.; Serrat, N.; Sanjuan Pla, A.; Menéndez, P.; Roué, G.; López-Guillermo, A.; et al. Daratumumab displays in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity in models of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and improves responses to standard chemo-immunotherapy regimens. Haematologica 2019, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Huang, H.-Q.; Kim, W.-S.; Yao, M.; Kim, T.M.; Yoon, D.; Cho, S.-G.; Eom, H.-S.; Yeh, S.-P.; Lim, S.T.; Son, Y.; et al. Daratumumab Monotherapy for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Natural Killer/T-cell Lymphoma (NKTCL), Nasal type: Updated Results from an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase 2 Study. Blood 2019, 134 (Suppl. 1), 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Keir, M.E.; Butte, M.J.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 677–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Hui, E.; Cheung, J.; Zhu, J.; Su, X.; Taylor, M.J.; Wallweber, H.A.; Sasmal, D.K.; Huang, J.; Kim, J.M.; Mellman, I.; et al. T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1-mediated inhibition. Science 2017, 355, 1428–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gong, J.; Chehrazi-Raffle, A.; Reddi, S.; Salgia, R. Development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as a form of cancer immunotherapy: A comprehensive review of registration trials and future considerations. J. Immunother. Cancer 2018, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, L.; Diao, L.; Yang, Y.; Yi, X.; Rodriguez, B.L.; Li, Y.; Villalobos, P.A.; Cascone, T.; Liu, X.; Tan, L.; et al. CD38-Mediated Immunosuppression as a Mechanism of Tumor Cell Escape from PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 1156–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Morandi, F.; Morandi, B.; Horenstein, A.L.; Chillemi, A.; Quarona, V.; Zaccarello, G.; Carrega, P.; Ferlazzo, G.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, L.; et al. A non-canonical adenosinergic pathway led by CD38 in human melanoma cells induces suppression of T cell proliferation. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 25602–25618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Ansell, S.M.; Lesokhin, A.M.; Borrello, I.; Halwani, A.; Scott, E.C.; Gutierrez, M.; Schuster, S.J.; Millenson, M.M.; Cattry, D.; Freeman, G.J.; et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Chen, R.; Zinzani, P.L.; Fanale, M.A.; Armand, P.; Johnson, N.A.; Brice, P.; Radford, J.; Ribrag, V.; Molin, D.; Vassilakopoulos, T.P.; et al. Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 2125–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zinzani, P.L.; Santoro, A.; Gritti, G.; Brice, P.; Barr, P.M.; Kuruvilla, J.; Cunningham, D.; Kline, J.; Johnson, N.A.; Mehta-Shah, N.; et al. Nivolumab Combined With Brentuximab Vedotin for Relapsed/Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Efficacy and Safety From the Phase II CheckMate 436 Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 3081–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Armand, P.; Rodig, S.; Melnichenko, V.; Thieblemont, C.; Bouabdallah, K.; Tumyan, G.; Özcan, M.; Portino, S.; Fogliatto, L.; Caballero, M.D.; et al. Pembrolizumab in Relapsed or Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 3291–3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Strati, P.; Neelapu, S.S. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Engineered T Cell Therapy in Lymphoma. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 21, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Neelapu, S.S.; Locke, F.L.; Bartlett, N.L.; Lekakis, L.J.; Miklos, D.B.; Jacobson, C.A.; Braunschweig, I.; Oluwole, O.O.; Siddiqi, T.; Lin, Y.; et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2531–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Locke, F.L.; Ghobadi, A.; Jacobson, C.A.; Miklos, D.B.; Lekakis, L.J.; Oluwole, O.O.; Lin, Y.; Braunschweig, I.; Hill, B.T.; Timmerman, J.M.; et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): A single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Schuster, S.J.; Bishop, M.R.; Tam, C.S.; Waller, E.K.; Borchmann, P.; McGuirk, J.P.; Jäger, U.; Jaglowski, S.; Andreadis, C.; Westin, J.R.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mihara, K.; Yanagihara, K.; Takigahira, M.; Imai, C.; Kitanaka, A.; Takihara, Y.; Kimura, A. Activated T-cell-mediated immunotherapy with a chimeric receptor against CD38 in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J. Immunother. 2009, 32, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bhattacharyya, J.; Mihara, K.; Kitanaka, A.; Yanagihara, K.; Kubo, T.; Takei, Y.; Kimura, A.; Takihara, Y. T-cell immunotherapy with a chimeric receptor against CD38 is effective in eradicating chemotherapy-resistant B-cell lymphoma cells overexpressing survivin induced by BMI-1. Blood Cancer J. 2012, 2, e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mihara, K.; Yoshida, T.; Takei, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Takihara, Y.; Kuroda, J.; Ichinohe, T. T cells bearing anti-CD19 and/or anti-CD38 chimeric antigen receptors effectively abrogate primary double-hit lymphoma cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 10, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gökbuget, N.; Dombret, H.; Bonifacio, M.; Reichle, A.; Graux, C.; Faul, C.; Diedrich, H.; Topp, M.S.; Brüggemann, M.; Horst, H.A.; et al. Blinatumomab for minimal residual disease in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2018, 131, 1522–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Kantarjian, H.; Jabbour, E.; Topp, M.S. Blinatumomab for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zuch de Zafra, C.L.; Fajardo, F.; Zhong, W.; Bernett, M.J.; Muchhal, U.S.; Moore, G.L.; Stevens, J.; Case, R.; Pearson, J.T.; Liu, S.; et al. Targeting Multiple Myeloma with AMG 424, a Novel Anti-CD38/CD3 Bispecific T-cell-recruiting Antibody Optimized for Cytotoxicity and Cytokine Release. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 3921–3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cells 09 00802 g001 550
Figure 1. Creation of immunosuppressive microenvironment by CD38-expressing immune cells. The activation of CD38-mediated signaling pathways on regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, MDSCs and specific NK cell subsets of the tumor microenvironment leads to inhibition of effector T-cell activity, thus contributing to immune escape.
Figure 1. Creation of immunosuppressive microenvironment by CD38-expressing immune cells. The activation of CD38-mediated signaling pathways on regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, MDSCs and specific NK cell subsets of the tumor microenvironment leads to inhibition of effector T-cell activity, thus contributing to immune escape.
Cells 09 00802 g001
Cells 09 00802 g002 550
Figure 2. CD38-mediated acquired resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors. Malignant cells resistant to checkpoint inhibition produce mediators such as ATR that lead to CD38 up-regulation via RARα. CD38 catalyzes the conversion of NAD+ into immunosuppressive adenosine via the CD38/CD203a/CD73 ectoenzymatic pathway. Adenosine interacts with A2AR and A2BR adenosine receptors on CD8+ T cells, thus suppressing cytotoxic activity.
Figure 2. CD38-mediated acquired resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors. Malignant cells resistant to checkpoint inhibition produce mediators such as ATR that lead to CD38 up-regulation via RARα. CD38 catalyzes the conversion of NAD+ into immunosuppressive adenosine via the CD38/CD203a/CD73 ectoenzymatic pathway. Adenosine interacts with A2AR and A2BR adenosine receptors on CD8+ T cells, thus suppressing cytotoxic activity.
Cells 09 00802 g002
Table
Table 1. Efficacy of anti-CD38 antibodies for the treatment of lymphoproliferative neoplasms, current data, and future perspectives.
Table 1. Efficacy of anti-CD38 antibodies for the treatment of lymphoproliferative neoplasms, current data, and future perspectives.
Tumor TypeDrugPatients (N)OS/PFS/ORRAuthorsReferences
NHLDaratumumab36ORR 8%Salles et al., Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2019[69]
r/r ENKLDaratumumab32ORR 25%Huang et al., Blood 2019 [abstract][88]
CLLDaratumumab + Ibrutinib31 (estimated)Currently recruiting-NCT03447808
(clinicaltrials.gov)
CLL p53 mutDaratumumab + Ibrutinib44 (estimated)Currently recruiting-NCT03734198
(clinicaltrials.gov)
cHL, DLBCL, PTCLIsatuximab + Cemiplimab130 (estimated)Currently recruiting-NCT03769181
(clinicaltrials.gov)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calabretta, E.; Carlo-Stella, C. The Many Facets of CD38 in Lymphoma: From Tumor–Microenvironment Cell Interactions to Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy. Cells 2020, 9, 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040802

AMA Style

Calabretta E, Carlo-Stella C. The Many Facets of CD38 in Lymphoma: From Tumor–Microenvironment Cell Interactions to Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy. Cells. 2020; 9(4):802. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calabretta, Eleonora, and Carmelo Carlo-Stella. 2020. "The Many Facets of CD38 in Lymphoma: From Tumor–Microenvironment Cell Interactions to Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy" Cells 9, no. 4: 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop