Next Article in Journal
Erratum: Hopp, A.K., et al. Regulation of Glucose Metabolism by NAD+ and ADP-Ribosylation. Cells 2019, 8, 890
Previous Article in Journal
Mitotic Chromosomes in Live Cells Characterized Using High-Speed and Label-Free Optical Diffraction Tomography
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/cells8111370
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phosphatidylethanolamine-Binding Protein 1 Ameliorates Ischemia-Induced Inflammation and Neuronal Damage in the Rabbit Spinal Cord

by
Woosuk Kim
1,2,†,
Su Bin Cho
1,†,
Hyo Young Jung
2,
Dae Young Yoo
3,
Jae Keun Oh
4,
Goang-Min Choi
5,
Tack-Geun Cho
6,
Dae Won Kim
7,
In Koo Hwang
2,
Soo Young Choi
1,* and
Seung Myung Moon
8,9,*
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, and Research Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
2
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
3
Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan 31151, Korea
4
Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Pyeongchon 14068, Korea
5
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
6
Department of Neurosurgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul 07441, Korea
7
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Research Institute of Oral Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea
8
Department of Neurosurgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Hwaseong 18450, Korea
9
Research Institute for Complementary & Alternative Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These co-authors equally contributed to this article.
Cells 2019, 8(11), 1370; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111370
Submission received: 5 September 2019 / Revised: 25 October 2019 / Accepted: 29 October 2019 / Published: 31 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Cellular Pathology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In a previous study, we utilized a proteomic approach and found a significant reduction in phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1) protein level in the spinal cord at 3 h after ischemia. In the present study, we investigated the role of PEBP1 against oxidative stress in NSC34 cells in vitro, and ischemic damage in the rabbit spinal cord in vivo. We generated a PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein to facilitate the penetration of blood-brain barrier and intracellular delivery of PEBP1 protein. Treatment with PEP-1-PEBP1 significantly decreased cell death and the induction of oxidative stress in NSC34 cells. Furthermore, administering PEP-1-PEBP1 did not show any significant side effects immediately before and after ischemia/reperfusion. Administration of PEP-PEBP1 improved the Tarlov’s neurological score at 24 and 72 h after ischemia, and significantly improved neuronal survival at 72 h after ischemia based on neuronal nuclei (NeuN) immunohistochemistry, Flouro-Jade B staining, and western blot study for cleaved caspase 3. PEP-1-PEBP1 administration decreased oxidative stress based on malondialdehyde level, advanced oxidation protein products, and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α in the spinal cord. In addition, inflammation based on myeloperoxidase level, tumor necrosis factor-α level, and high mobility group box 1 level was decreased by PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment at 72 h after ischemia. Thus, PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment, which decreases oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and neuronal death, may be an effective therapeutic strategy for spinal cord ischemia.

1. Introduction

Interruption of the aorta or its segmental arteries results devastating and unpredictable complications, such as paraplegia caused by ischemia in spinal cord [1] during en bloc spondylectomy or aortic repair surgery [2,3]. Transient occlusion of aorta causes decreased blood flow in the spinal cord, and thus increases the cellular damage in the motor neurons of spinal cord [4]. Especially, rabbits receive homosegmental blood supply in the spinal cord, with no collateral blood supply coming from the thoracic spinal cord. In addition, the more caudal origin of the Adamkiewicz artery compared to that of other mammals is the rationale for using rabbits as an animal model for ischemia in the caudal half of the spinal cord [5]. Many have attempted to improve the prevention and treatment of spinal cord ischemia, but complications still affect the quality of life throughout the patient’s lifetime. Various cell death mechanisms have been identified in spinal cord ischemia, including oxidative stress by reactive oxygen species (ROS) after reperfusion and subsequent inflammation [6,7,8]. Neurons have many unsaturated fatty acids and utilize glucose as an energy source, and an interruption of blood supply and reoxygenation enormously increases the formation of ROS [9]. Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1) has the ability to suppress the Raf1-mitogen activated protein kinase pathway, and therefore is also named Raf1 kinase inhibitory protein. PEBP1 stimulates acetylcholine synthesis in the median septal nuclei [10] and PEBP1 expression is decreased in hippocampus of Alzheimer patients [11]. In addition, chronic corticosterone treatment results in cognitive impairment via the down-regulation of PEBP1 expression in the hippocampus [12]. PEBP1 also promotes oligodendrocyte and neuronal differentiation [13,14]. Especially, PEBP1 overexpression facilitates the neuronal differentiation, although retinoic acid is not supplied into cell media [13]. In a previous proteomic approach, we observed that spinal cord ischemia significantly changes the various protein levels in the lumbar segments of spinal cord 3 h after ischemia in rabbits. Among differentially expressed proteins, we validated that PEBP1 was significantly decreased in the lumbar region 3 h after ischemia [15]. In addition, our colleagues observed that phosphorylated PEBP1 levels significantly increase in the hippocampal CA1 region 1–2 days after ischemia. In addition, administering PEP-1-PEBP1 significantly ameliorates the pyramidal cell damage induced by ischemia in gerbils via extracellular signal-regulated kinases and phosphorylation of cyclic-AMP response element binding protein signaling [16]. However, there are only few studies on the effects of PEBP1 against ischemic damage in the spinal cord.
In the previous study, we generated a PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein and confirmed it could penetrate the blood-brain barrier and plasma membrane of neurons [16]. In the present study, we examined the effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment on H2O2-induced oxidative stress in NSC34 cells in vitro and ischemic damage in the rabbit spinal cord in vivo.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. PEP-1-PEBP1 Fusion Protein Construction and Assessment Its Efficiency

2.1.1. Cell Preparation

NSC34 cells were used in the present study and cells were maintained in the conditions described in the previous study [15]. Special medium was utilized to promote the neuronal differentiation as mentioned by Eggett et al. [17], and the cell had motor neuron-like morphology at seven days after growing [17].

2.1.2. Construction of PEP-1-PEBP1

The cDNA sequence for human PEBP1 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the PEBP1-specific sense primer 5′-CTC GAG ATG CCG GTG GAC C-3′, which contained an XhoI restriction site, and the PEBP1-specific anti-sense primer, 5′-GGA TCC CTA CTT CCC AGA CAG C-3′, which contained a BamHI restriction site. PEP-1-PEBP1 was by ligation of a TA cloning vector with human PEBP1 cDNA and expression plasmid was inserted into a pET-15 vector with His-PEP-1-PEBP1 or His-PEBP1. PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 proteins were produced as described in a previous study [16], and the production of PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 proteins was confirmed by western blot analysis for polyhistidine antibody (1:2000, His-probe, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as described previously [16,18].

2.1.3. Transduction of PEP-1-PEBP1 Proteins into NSC34 Cells

Transduction of PEP-1-PEBP1 proteins into NSC34 cells was confirmed as described previously [15]. Briefly, NSC34 cells received dose-dependent (0.5–3 μM) treatment of PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein and harvested 1 h after treatment. In addition, cells were treated with 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 treatment and harvested at various times (0–36 h) after treatment to observe the intracellular penetration efficacy and stability of PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein. Expression of PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 proteins was evaluated by western blot analysis for polyhistidine antibody, as described previously [16,18].

2.1.4. Intracellular Location of PEP-1-PEBP1

Intracellular delivery of PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein was confirmed by immunocytochemical staining for polyhistidine, as described previously [15,16]. Briefly, cells cultured on coverslips were incubated with 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein for 1 h at 37 °C, and the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min. The immunocytochemical procedures were conducted as described previously [16], and the cells were subsequently incubated with rabbit anti-polyhistidine antibody (1:2000, SantaCruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and AlexaFluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:1500, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 25 °C for 1 h with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany).

2.2. Protective Effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 against Oxidative Stress in NSC34 Cells

2.2.1. DNA Damage and Oxidative Stress

To elucidate the effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein on DNA damage and oxidative stress, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) staining was done as described in previous studies [15,16]. Briefly, NSC34 cells were incubated with 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein for 1 h and thereafter exposed to 1 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 3 h and 10 min for TUNEL and DCF-DA staining as described previously [15], respectively. Thereafter, the cells were treated with 20 μM DCF-DA for 30 min for DCF-DA staining. TUNEL and DCF-DA staining were observed with a fluorescence microscope (Nikon eclipse 80i, Tokyo, Japan) and staining intensity of DCF-DA was evaluated by a Fluoroskan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader (Labsystems Oy) at 485 nm excitation and 538 nm emission wavelengths. In addition, fluorescence positive cells were counted under a phase-contrast microscopy (×200 magnification) [19,20].

2.2.2. Measurement of Cell Viability

Effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein on cell viability was assessed based on a WST-1 assay kit (Daeillab Service, Seoul, South Korea) as described previously [15]. Briefly, PEP-1-PEBP1 or control-PEBP1 protein (0.5–3 μM) was pretreated in NSC34 cells for 1 h and thereafter cells were exposed to 1 mM H2O2 for 5 h. Cell viability was measured at 450 nm using an ELISA microplate reader (Labsystems Multiskan MCC/340, Helsinki, Finland), and cell viability was expressed as a percentage value versus that in the untreated control cells.

2.2.3. Western Blot Analysis

Equal amounts of cell lysates were resolved by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and the proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, 140 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.5). Then, the membrane was probed with the rabbit anti-caspase 3 (CST #9662S, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), and rabbit anti-cleaved caspase 3 (c-caspase 3, CST #9661S, Cell Signaling Technology), and horse anti-rabbit IgG (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). The proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL; Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) protocol according to the manufacturer’s instructions [19].

2.3. In vivo Neuroprotective Action of PEP-1-PEBP1 against Spinal Cord Ischemia

2.3.1. Experimental Animals

Male New Zealand white rabbits (1.2–1.5 kg) were purchased from Experimental Animal Center (Cheonan Yonam College, Cheonan, South Korea) and were housed as described in the previous studies [15,21]. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Seoul National University approved the animal procedures (SNU-160613-18).

2.3.2. Determination of Effective PEP-1-PEBP1 Concentration against Ischemic Damage

To observe dose-dependent effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 on motor neurons in ventral horn of spinal cord after ischemia, the animals were divided into five groups: Sham-operated (control), PEP-1 peptide, 10 mg/kg control-PEBP1, 1 mg/kg PEP-1-PEBP1, 3 mg/kg PEP-1-PEBP1, and 10 mg/kg PEP-1-PEBP1 treated groups. Animals received treatment of PEP-1 peptide, control-PEBP1, or PEP-1-PEBP1 immediately after reperfusion.

2.3.3. Ischemic Surgery

The ischemic surgery was performed as described in a previous study [15]. Briefly, animals were anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA) and occluded the abdominal aorta with an aneurysm clip at subrenal region for 30 min. Body temperature of rabbits were tightly controlled (38.7 ± 0.3 °C) using a thermometric blanket during anesthesia. Sham operation was also conducted for control group with same procedures without occlusion of abdominal aorta.

2.3.4. Monitoring of Physiological Parameters

Blood in all groups was obtained from ear vein to measure the blood glucose, pH, and arterial blood gases (PaO2 and PaCO2) before ischemic surgery and 10 min after reperfusion, as described previously [15]. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was assessed in caudal artery by physiography (Physiograph; Gould Instrument Systems, OH, USA) and acquisition software (Ponemah version 3.0; Gould Instrument Systems).

2.3.5. Neurological Assessment

Neurological function of animals was assessed by modified Tarlov criteria, as described in previous studies [15,21], with two independent observers for each experiment 24 h and 72 h after reperfusion because the animals showed neurological deficits 12–24 h after reperfusion [22,23].

2.3.6. Detection of Neuronal Survival and Cell Death

Rabbits (n = 5 in each group) were anesthetized with 2 g/kg urethane (Sigma) after the neurological assessment and perfused transcardially, as described previously [15,21]. Lumbar segments (L5-L6) of spinal cord were removed and 30-μm-thick sections were obtained using a cryostat (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
Immunohistochemical staining for neuronal nuclei (NeuN) was conducted as described previously [15,21]. Sections were subsequently incubated with a mouse anti-NeuN antibody (1:1000; Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA), biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG, followed by a streptavidin-peroxidase complex (1:200, Vector). Immunoreactive structures were visualized by reaction with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2).
The number of NeuN-immunoreactive cells in all the groups were counted using an image analysis system (software: Optimas 6.5®, CyberMetrics, Scottsdale, AZ, USA) as described previously [15,21].
To investigate the degeneration/death of cells, Fluoro-Jade B (FJB, a fluorescent marker for the localization of cellular degeneration) histofluorescence staining was conducted according to the method published by Candelario-Jalil et al. [24]. In brief, the sections were immersed in 1% sodium hydroxide in 80% alcohol and followed in 70% alcohol. They were then transferred to 0.06% potassium permanganate solution and incubated in 0.0004% FJ B (Histochem, Jefferson, AR, USA) solution. Finally, they were placed on a slide warmer (about 50 °C) to be reacted. The reacted sections were examined using an epifluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany), which was equipped with blue excitation light (450–490 nm).

2.3.7. Biochemical Assessments in Spinal Cord Tissue

To measure biochemical parameters in spinal cord tissue, control, PEP-1 peptide-treated, 10 mg/kg Control-PEBP1-treated, and 3 mg/kg PEP-1-PEBP1-treated rabbits (n = 5 in each group) were euthanized with overdose of urethane (Sigma) 72 h after reperfusion, and spinal cord tissue at L5-L6 levels were obtained. Quantitative analysis was conducted by western blot analysis for caspase 3 and c-caspase 3 in the spinal cord. Briefly, animals were sacrificed using 2 g/kg of the anesthetic urethane (Sigma-Aldrich). Lumbar segments (L5-L6) of spinal cord were removed and used for western blot study as described in a previous study [25]. Briefly, the protein-transferred membrane was sequentially incubated with rabbit anti-caspase 3 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) or rabbit anti-c-caspase 3 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:1000, Vector), and an ECL chemiluminescent kit (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
Tissue MDA (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), MPO (Cusabio, Hubei, China), HMGB (IBL, Hamburg, Germany), TNF-α (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), and 8-iso-PGF2α (Cayman Chemical Company) levels were measured by commercially available ELISA kits. AOPP levels were measured by a spectrophotometric method (Schimadzu UV 1601 spectrophotometer) in the presence of potassium iodide at 340 nm as demonstrated by Witko-Sarsat et al. [26] and calibrated with chloramine-T solutions. The AOPP levels were expressed in micromoles chloramine-T equivalents per liter.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were shown as mean with standard errors of mean or 95% confidence interval and analyzed statistically using by Student t-test or a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test using GraphPad Prism 5.01 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Production and Delivery of PEP-1-PEBP1 Protein into NSC34 Cells

PEP-1-PEBP1 was manufactured by fusion of human PEBP1 gene and a PEP-1 expression vector (Figure 1A). Following overexpression in yeast, purification of PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 proteins were conducted with a Nib+- → Ni2+- nitrilotriacetic acid Sepharose affinity column and PD-10 column chromatography. Western blot analysis with a polyhistidine antibody identified PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 proteins at approximately 23 kDa and 25 kDa, confirming the successful expression of these proteins (Figure 1B).
Concentration- and time-dependent changes in polyhistidine expression were determined in NSC-34 cells. Weak polyhistidine expression was found at 1 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment and expression increased dose-dependently by 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment. However, polyhistidine expression was not observed upon treatment with any concentration of control-PEBP1 (Figure 2A). In addition, polyhistidine expression was found at 30 min upon treatment with 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1, and expression increased with time by 1 h after treatment. Similarly, no polyhistidine expression was found at any time after control-PEBP1 treatment (Figure 2B).
The intracellular stability of transduced PEBP1 protein in NSC34 cells was assessed by western blotting for polyhistidine. Polyhistidine protein levels had decreased 24 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment, and had disappeared at 36 h after treatment (Figure 2C).
Transduced PEBP1 was observed by polyhistidine immunocytochemistry, and no signals were observed in the control NSC34 cells or cells 1 h after 3 μM control-PEBP1 treatment. In contrast, treatment with 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 showed polyhistidine immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm and cell membrane, but not in the nucleus of NSC34 cells (Figure 2D).

3.2. Effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 on Oxidative Damage in NSC34 Cells

Exposure to 1 mM H2O2 for 3 h significantly decreased cell viability to 47.96% of the viability of the control group. However, pre-treatment with PEP-1-PEBP1 protein for 1 h before exposure to H2O2 showed dose-dependent increases in cell viability, and 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 showed significant increases in cell viability compared to that in the control-PEBP1-treated group, and cell viability was 66.37% of the viability of the control group (Figure 3A). However, treatment with various concentrations of control-PEBP1 did not significantly change cell viability.
ROS formation was measured by DCF-DA-fluorescent staining in NSC34 cells. Treatment with 1 mM H2O2 for 3 h showed strongly DCF-DA positive cells, and reactive fluorescence intensity was significantly increased compared to that in the control group. Pretreatment with control-PEBP1 did not significantly change DCF-DA reactive fluorescence in NSC34 cells compared to that in the H2O2-treated vehicle group. However, PEP-1-PEBP1 pretreatment significantly decreased DCF-DA reactive fluorescence compared to that in the H2O2-treated vehicle group (Figure 3B).
Apoptotic cell death was assessed by TUNEL staining 5 h after exposure to H2O2 in NSC34 cells. Exposure to 1 mM H2O2 for 5 h showed abundant TUNEL-positive cells, and reactive fluorescence intensity was significantly increased compared to that in the control group. Pretreatment with PEP-1-PEBP1 before exposure to 1 mM H2O2 significantly decreased the number of TUNEL-positive cells compared to that in the H2O2-treated vehicle group, while pretreatment with control-PEBP1 showed a similar number of TUNEL-positive cells with that in the H2O2-treated vehicle group (Figure 3C).
Cell death was also confirmed 5 h after exposure to H2O2 in NSC34 cells by western blot analysis for caspase 3 and c-caspase 3. Caspase 3 protein levels did not show any significant changes in all groups after control-PEBP1 or PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment, while c-caspase 3 protein levels were dramatically increased in vehicle group after H2O2 exposure compared to that in the control group. Treatment with control-PEBP1 had no effects on the c-caspase 3 levels in NSC34 cells compared to that in the vehicle group, but PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment significantly reduced the c-caspase 3 protein levels by 46.98% of vehicle group in NSC34 cells (Figure 3D).

3.3. Effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 on Physiological Data against Spinal Cord Ischemia

The acute side effects of control-PEBP1 or PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment on physiological conditions such as blood pH, pO2, pCO2, and glucose levels, as well as distal MAP, were measured before ischemic surgery and 10 min after reperfusion. Administration of control-PEBP1 or PEP-1-PEBP1 did not significantly change these physiological parameters before ischemic surgery and 10 min after reperfusion (Table 1). Effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 were evaluated with Tarlov’s neurological score 24 h and 72 h after reperfusion, NeuN immunohistochemical staining 72 h after reperfusion. In the control group, all rabbits did not show any neurological problems in posture and behavior during experimental periods. In addition, abundant NeuN-positive nuclei were detected in the ventral horn of spinal cord. In the vehicle-treated and control-PEBP1-treated groups, rabbits showed abnormal hindlimb posture with a mean neurological score of 0.75–0.80 at 24 h and 72 h after reperfusion. In addition, few NeuN-positive nuclei were detected in the ventral horn, and the number of NeuN-positive nuclei was 11.89% and 14.27% of that in the control group, respectively. In the 1 mg/kg PEP-1-PEBP1-treated group, the Tarlov’s neurological scores were slightly increased compared to that in the vehicle (PEP-1 peptide)-treated group, and some NeuN-positive nuclei were detected in the ventral horn, although the difference in the number of NeuN-positive nuclei was not statistically significant between control and vehicle-treated groups. In the 3 and 10 mg/kg PEP-1-PEBP1-treated groups, rabbits were able to move voluntarily and showed higher neurological scores of 2.75–3.25 at 24 h and 72 h after reperfusion. Many NeuN-positive nuclei were observed in the ventral horn in the 3 and 10 mg/kg PEP-1-PEBP1-treated groups, and the number of NeuN-positive nuclei was 65.30% and 74.00% of that of the control group (Figure 4).

3.4. Effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 on Neuronal Death against Spinal Cord Ischemia

The effects of control-PEBP1 or PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment on neuronal cell death were evaluated by FJB staining and western blot for caspase 3 and c-caspase 3 in the spinal cord. In control group, FJB positive cells were not detected in the ventral horn of spinal cord. In the PEP-1 peptide- and control-PEBP1-treated groups, FJB positive cells were found in the ventral horn of spinal cord and c-caspase 3 was prominently increased compared to that in the control group. In these groups, there were significant differences on FJB positive cells and c-caspase levels in the spinal cord. In the PEP-1-PEBP1-treated group, fewer FJB positive cells were found in the spinal cord compared to that in the PEP-1 peptide- or control-PEBP-1-treated group, respectively. In addition, c-caspase 3 levels were also significantly decreased in the PEP-1-PEBP1-treated group compared to that in the PEP-1 peptide-treated group (Figure 5).

3.5. Effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation after Spinal Cord Ischemia

In spinal cord tissues, levels of MDA, AOPP, and 8-iso-PGF2α, three oxidative stress biomarkers, were measured to determine ischemia-related oxidative stress in the spinal cord 72 h after ischemia. In the PEP-1 peptide-treated group, MDA, AOPP, and 8-iso-PGF2α levels were significantly increased in the spinal cord after ischemia by 225.04%, 145.64%, and 1049.17% of that of the control group, respectively. In the control-PEBP1-treated group, MDA and AOPP levels were similarly detected compared to those in the PEP-1 peptide-treated group, although 8-iso-PGF2α level was slightly decreased in the control-PEBP1-treated group. However, the administration of PEP-1-PEBP1 significantly reduced ischemia-induced elevations of MDA, AOPP, and 8-iso-PGF2α levels to 126.43%, 103.77%, and 402.18% of that of the control group, respectively (Figure 6).
In the PEP-1 peptide-treated and control-PEBP1-trateed groups, MPO, TNF-α, and HMGB levels were significantly robustly increased in the spinal cord 72 h after ischemia compared to those in the control group. In this group, MPO, TNF-α, and HMGB levels in the spinal cord homogenates were 284.97%, 949.70%, and 471.92% of those in the control group, respectively. In the control-PEBP1-treated group, MPO level was similar to that in the PEP-1 peptide-treated groups, while TNF-α and HMGB levels were slightly decreased in the control-PEBP1-treated group compared to that in the PEP-1 peptide-treated group, respectively. Administration of PEP-1-PEBP1 ameliorated these dramatic increases of MPO, TNF-α, and HMGB levels in the spinal cord to 188.10%, 456.68%, and 203.31% of that of the control group, respectively (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

PEBP1 is involved in neuronal cell death and cognitive deficits in neurodegenerative diseases [27]. In addition, PEBP1 expression was shown to be decreased in various neurological disorders such as stroke [28], mild cognitive impairments [29], and Alzheimer’s disease [30]. However, other studies demonstrated that PEBP1 expression is increased in the spinal cord 24 h after contusion damage [31] and in the penumbra tissue 6 h after focal ischemia [32]. However, our previous proteomic study demonstrated that PEBP1 expression was decreased in the spinal cord 3 h after ischemia [15], and we also observed PEP-1-PEBP1 protected pyramidal neurons from transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils [16]. In the present study, we investigated the neuroprotective potentials of PEP-1-PEBP1 against spinal cord ischemia using NSC34 cells in vitro and a spinal cord ischemia model using rabbits in vivo.
In the present study, we observed concentration- and time-dependent delivery of PEP-1-PEBP1 proteins in the NSC34 cells, which have similar morphological and physiological properties as motor neurons [33,34,35]. However, treatment with control-PEBP1 did not result in polyhistidine expression in any concentration or time after treatment. This result was consistent with results of our previous study that PEP-1-PEBP1 was efficiently transduced into HT22 cells derived from the hippocampus [16]. In addition, we previously demonstrated that PEP-1-hemo oxygenase-1 fusion protein efficiently delivered into the ventral horn of rabbit spinal cord [36]. In the present study, we also observed the stable expression of PEP-1-PEBP1 by 24 h after treatment and transduced PEBP1 expression in the cytoplasm of NSC34 cells 1 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment. This result was supported by previous studies showing that PEBP1 is mainly expressed in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane [16,37,38,39].
In this study, we observed the effects of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 on H2O2-induced oxidative damage in NSC34 cells because glutamate-induced excitotoxicity has no specific effects in NSC34 cells [40]. Treatment with PEP-1-PEBP1, but not with control-PEBP1, significantly reduced cell death and ROS formation in NSC34 cells after exposure to H2O2 based on caspase 3 western blot, TUNEL, DCF-DA staining, and WST-1 assays. This result suggests that PEP-1-PEBP1 prevents neuronal death from oxidative damage via reducing ROS formation. Depletion of PEBP1 significantly increases generation of mitochondrial superoxide in HEK-499 cells [41]. In contrast, overexpressing PEBP1 or administering PEP-1-PEBP1 ameliorates the generation of mitochondrial superoxide in HEK-499 cells [35] and ROS formation in HT22 cells [16].
We examined the neuroprotective effects of control-PEBP1 or PEP-1-PEBP1 against ischemic damage in the rabbit spinal cord. Acute side effects of control-PEBP1 or PEP-1-PEBP1 10 min before and after ischemia were monitored, but we did not observe any significant change in physiological parameters such as pH, pO2, pCO2, or glucose levels. Spinal cord ischemia showed neurological deficits in rabbits’ hindlimb functions and posture judging from Tarlov’s criteria at 24 h and 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion. Administering control-PEBP1 resulted in similar neurological deficits in rabbits compared to that in the PEP-1 peptide-treated group at 24 h and 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion. In addition, NeuN-immunoreactive surviving neurons were few in the PEP-1-peptide or control-PEBP1 treated groups compared to that in the control group at 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion, while FJB positive cells and c-caspase 3 protein levels were significantly increased compared to that in the control group. However, the administration of PEP-1-PEBP1 showed dose-dependent improvements in rabbits’ neurological scores at 24 h and 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion, although the neurological scores were slightly decreased at 72 h after ischemia. In addition, administration of PEP-1-PEBP1 significantly ameliorated the increases of FJB positive cells and c-caspase expression in the spinal cord induced transient ischemia. Spinal cord ischemia is caused by aortal occlusion during aortic repair surgery [1], and it would be easy to prevent ischemia-induced neuronal damage by administering PEP-1-PEBP1 to patients undergoing aortic repair surgery. In addition, protein therapy with PEP-1-PEBP1 can be applicable immediately if desired, while overexpression of PEBP1 by lentiviral vector requires enough time to express the PEBP1. Electroacupuncture at the acupoints of the governor vessel in animals with spinal cord injury significantly changes the expression of PEBP1 in the spinal cord [42]. Depletion of PEBP1 suppresses the neuronal differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells induced by retinoid acid, while PEBP1 overexpression facilitates differentiation into neurons without retinoic acid treatment in media [13,14]. In addition, PEBP1 also promotes the differentiation of hippocampal precursor cells following hypoxic ischemia [43]. This result is consistent with previous studies reporting that overexpressing PEBP1 or administering PEP-1-PEBP1 ameliorates ischemia-induced neuronal damage in brain ischemia models [16,28].
Spinal cord membranes consist of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and ischemia-induced ROS causes lipid peroxidation with MDA as a decomposition product [44]. AOPP is closely related to protein oxidation such as cross-liked protein products that contain dityrosine [45]. In addition, 8-iso-PGF2α has been considered a specific and sensitive indicator for peroxidation caused by ROS [46]. In the present study, we measured MDA, AOPP, and 8-iso-PGF2α levels to observe ischemia-induced lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in the spinal cord. Spinal cord ischemia significantly elevated the MDA, AOPP, and 8-iso-PGF2α levels in the spinal cord at 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion, consistent with results of a previous study [47]. In the present study, administration of control-PEBP1 did not show any significant decreases in MDA, AOPP, and 8-iso-PGF2α levels in the spinal cord at 72 h after ischemia compared to that in the PEP-1 peptide-treated group. In contrast, PEP-1-PEBP1 significantly ameliorated increases of MDA, AOPP, and 8-iso-PGF2α levels in the spinal cord following ischemia, suggesting that administering PEP-1-PEBP1 reduces ischemia-induced lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in the spinal cord.
MPO is a hemoprotein expressed by polymorphonuclear neutrophils and is an indicator of neutrophil infiltration into tissues [48]. In the present study, we observed increased MPO levels in the spinal cord at 72 h after ischemia compared to that in the control group. This result is supported by a previous study that found MPO activity is significantly increased in the spinal cord ischemic group compared to that in the sham group [49]. We observed a significant reduction of MPO levels in the spinal cord by PEP-1-PEBP1, not control-PEBP1, treatment following ischemia/reperfusion. In addition, we also observed TNF-α levels in the spinal cord because ischemia recruits neutrophils, which mediate the inflammatory response by producing TNF-α and other cytokines [50,51]. Spinal cord ischemia significantly increased the TNF-α levels in the spinal cord compared to that in the control group and administering PEP-1-PEBP1, not control-PEBP1, mitigated the ischemia-induced elevation of TNF-α levels in the spinal cord after ischemia/reperfusion. This result is supported by previous studies reporting that spinal cord ischemia robustly increases TNF-α levels [52,53]. HMGB1 is another inflammatory mediator that injured cells immediately release the HMGB1 to establish and facilitate inflammatory responses [54], and inhibiting HMGB1 release can be a novel therapeutic approach to treat spinal cord injury [55]. In the present study, we observed increases of HMGB1 levels in the spinal cord after ischemia/reperfusion. This result is consistent with results of a previous study that HMGB1 mRNA and protein levels were significantly increased in the spinal cord after ischemia/reperfusion [56]. In the present study, administering PEP-1-PEBP1 ameliorated ischemia-induced release of HMGB1 in the spinal cord compared to that in the PEP-1 peptide- or control-PEBP1-treated groups, suggesting that inhibiting HMGB1 release may be one of the mechanisms for PEBP1 to reduce neuronal damage induced by ischemia. Electroacupuncture also reduces ischemic neuronal damage by inhibiting HMGB1 release in the spinal cord [56].
In conclusion, we generated a PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein and observed the effective penetration of PEP-1-PEBP1 into NSC34 cells. In addition, we observed the neuroprotective effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 against H2O2-induced oxidative stress in NSC34 cells as well as ischemia-induced neuronal death in rabbit spinal cord, reducing inflammation and oxidative damage. These results suggest that the PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein may be applicable to reduce neuronal damage during aortic repair surgery and en bloc spondylectomy by suppressing oxidative stress and inflammation.

Author Contributions

W.K., S.B.C., H.Y.J., D.Y.Y., J.K.O., G.M.C., T.G.C., D.W.K., I.K.H., S.Y.C., and S.M.M. conceived the study. W.K., S.B.C., S.Y.C., and S.M.M. designed the study. J.K.O., G.M.C., and T.G.C. conducted ischemic surgery. W.K., H.Y.J., D.Y.Y., and I.K.H. conducted the behavioural and morphological study. S.B.C., D.W.K. conducted biochemical experiments. D.W.K. and I.K.H. participated in designing and discussing the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03931047 and NRF-2019R1A6A1A11036849).

Conflicts of Interest

All authors have approved the manuscript for submission, and we have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Yamauchi, T.; Takano, H.; Nishimura, M.; Matsumiya, G.; Sawa, Y. Paraplegia and paraparesis after descending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair: A risk factor analysis. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006, 12, 179–183. [Google Scholar]
  2. Disch, A.C.; Schaser, K.D.; Melcher, I.; Feraboli, F.; Schmoelz, W.; Druschel, C.; Luzzati, A. Oncosurgical results of multilevel thoracolumbar en-bloc spondylectomy and reconstruction with a carbon composite vertebral body replacement system. Spine 2011, 36, e647–e655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Luzzati, A.D.; Shah, S.P.; Gagliano, F.S.; Perrucchini, G.G.; Fontanella, W.; Alloisio, M. Four- and five- level en bloc spondylectomy for malignant spinal tumors. Spine 2014, 39, e129–e139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Etz, D.C.; Luehr, M.; Aspern, K.V.; Misfeld, M.; Gudehus, S.; Ender, J.; Koelbel, T.; Debus, E.S.; Mohr, F.W. Spinal cord ischemia in open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: New concepts. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2014, 55, 159–168. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mazensky, D.; Radonak, J.; Danko, J.; Petrovova, E.; Frankovicova, M. Anatomical study of blood supply to the spinal cord in the rabbit. Spinal Cord 2011, 49, 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Plata-Salamán, C.R.; Kelly, G.; Agresta, C.; Taylor, K.; Salzman, S.K. Interleukin-1 beta enhances spinal cord blood flow after intrathecal administration in the normal rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1995, 269, R1032–R1037. [Google Scholar]
  7. Akuzawa, S.; Kazui, T.; Shi, E.; Yamashita, K.; Bashar, A.H.; Terada, H. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist attenuates the severity of spinal cord ischemic injury in rabbits. J. Vasc. Surg. 2008, 48, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jia, Z.; Zhu, H.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Misra, H.; Li, Y. Oxidative stress in spinal cord injury and antioxidant-based intervention. Spinal Cord 2012, 50, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Subczynski, W.K.; Hyde, J.S. Concentration of oxygen in lipid bilayers using a spin-label method. Biophys. J. 1983, 41, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ojika, K.; Kojima, S.; Ueki, Y.; Fukushima, N.; Hayashi, K.; Yamamoto, M. Purification and structural analysis of hippocampal cholinergic neurostimulating peptide. Brain Res. 1992, 572, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maki, M.; Matsukawa, N.; Yuasa, H.; Otsuka, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Akatsu, H.; Okamoto, T.; Ueda, R.; Ojika, K. Decreased expression of hippocampal cholinergic neurostimulating peptide precursor protein mRNA in the hippocampus in Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2002, 61, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Feldmann, R.E., Jr.; Maurer, M.H.; Hunzinger, C.; Lewicka, S.; Buergers, H.F.; Kalenka, A.; Hinkelbein, J.; Broemme, J.O.; Seidler, G.H.; Martin, E.; et al. Reduction in rat phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein-1 (PEBP1) after chronic corticosterone treatment may be paralleled by cognitive impairment: A first study. Stress 2008, 11, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hellmann, J.; Rommelspacher, H.; Mühlbauer, E.; Wernicke, C. Raf kinase inhibitor protein enhances neuronal differentiation in human SH-SY5Y cells. Dev. Neurosci. 2010, 32, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sagisaka, T.; Matsukawa, N.; Toyoda, T.; Uematsu, N.; Kanamori, T.; Wake, H.; Borlongan, C.V.; Ojika, K. Directed neural lineage differentiation of adult hippocampal progenitor cells via modulation of hippocampal cholinergic neurostimulating peptide precursor expression. Brain Res. 2010, 1327, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yoo, D.Y.; Cho, S.B.; Jung, H.Y.; Kim, W.; Choi, G.M.; Won, M.H.; Kim, D.W.; Hwang, I.K.; Choi, S.Y.; Moon, S.M. Tat-protein disulfide-isomerase A3: A possible candidate for preventing ischemic damage in the spinal cord. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jung, H.Y.; Cho, S.B.; Kim, W.; Yoo, D.Y.; Won, M.H.; Choi, G.M.; Cho, T.G.; Kim, D.W.; Hwang, I.K.; Choi, S.Y.; et al. Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 protects CA1 neurons against ischemic damage via ERK-CREB signaling in Mongolian gerbils. Neurochem. Int. 2018, 118, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eggett, C.J.; Crosier, S.; Manning, P.; Cookson, M.R.; Menzies, F.M.; McNeil, C.J.; Shaw, P.J. Development and characterisation of a glutamate-sensitive motor neurone cell line. J. Neurochem. 2000, 74, 1895–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Eum, W.S.; Kim, D.W.; Hwang, I.K.; Yoo, K.Y.; Kang, T.C.; Jang, S.H.; Choi, H.S.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, S.Y.; et al. In vivo protein transduction: Biologically active intact pep-1-superoxide dismutase fusion protein efficiently protects against ischemic insult. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 37, 1656–1669. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jo, H.S.; Kim, D.W.; Shin, M.J.; Cho, S.B.; Park, J.H.; Lee, C.H.; Yeo, E.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Yeo, H.J.; Sohn, E.J.; et al. Tat-HSP22 inhibits oxidative stress-induced hippocampal neuronal cell death by regulation of the mitochondrial pathway. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yeo, H.J.; Shin, M.J.; Yeo, E.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Kim, D.W.; Kim, D.S.; Eum, W.S.; Choi, S.Y. Tat-CIAPIN1 inhibits hippocampal neuronal cell damage through the MAPK and apoptotic signaling pathways. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 135, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, W.; Kwon, H.J.; Jung, H.Y.; Yoo, D.Y.; Moon, S.M.; Kim, D.W.; Hwang, I.K. Tat-HSP70 protects neurons from oxidative damage in the NSC34 cells and ischemic damage in the ventral horn of rabbit spinal cord. Neurochem. Int. 2019, 129, 104477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Moore, W.M., Jr.; Hollier, L.H. The influence of severity of spinal cord ischemia in the etiology of delayed-onset paraplegia. Ann. Surg. 1991, 213, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wisselink, W.; Patetsios, P.; Panetta, T.F.; Ramirez, J.A.; Rodino, W.; Kirwin, J.D.; Zikria, B.A. Medium molecular weight pentastarch reduces reperfusion injury by decreasing capillary leak in an animal model of spinal cord ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 1998, 27, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Candelario-Jalil, E.; Alvarez, D.; Merino, N.; León, O.S. Delayed treatment with nimesulide reduces measures of oxidative stress following global ischemic brain injury in gerbils. Neurosci. Res. 2003, 47, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kwon, H.J.; Jung, H.Y.; Hahn, K.R.; Kim, W.; Kim, J.W.; Yoo, D.Y.; Yoon, Y.S.; Hwang, I.K.; Kim, D.W. Bacopa monnieri extract improves novel object recognition, cell proliferation, neuroblast differentiation, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding protein in the dentate gyrus. Lab. Anim. Res. 2018, 34, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Witko-Sarsat, V.; Friedlander, M.; Capeillère-Blandin, C.; Nguyen-Khoa, T.; Nguyen, A.T.; Zingraff, J.; Jungers, P.; Descamps-Latscha, B. Advanced oxidation protein products as a novel marker of oxidative stress in uremia. Kidney Int. 1996, 49, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. George, A.J.; Holsinger, R.M.; McLean, C.A.; Tan, S.S.; Scott, H.S.; Cardamone, T.; Cappai, R.; Masters, C.L.; Li, Q.X. Decreased phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein expression correlates with Aβ accumulation in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2006, 27, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, L.; Zhang, R.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Ma, C. Raf kinase inhibitor protein attenuates ischemic-induced microglia cell apoptosis and activation through NF-κB pathway. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aluise, C.D.; Robinson, R.A.; Cai, J.; Pierce, W.M.; Markesbery, W.R.; Butterfield, D.A. Redox proteomics analysis of brains from subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment compared to brains from subjects with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Insights into memory loss in MCI. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011, 23, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gatta, V.; D’Aurora, M.; Granzotto, A.; Stuppia, L.; Sensi, S.L. Early and sustained altered expression of aging-related genes in young 3xTg-AD mice. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsai, M.C.; Shen, L.F.; Kuo, H.S.; Cheng, H.; Chak, K.F. Involvement of acidic fibroblast growth factor in spinal cord injury repair processes revealed by a proteomics approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 1668–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, J.; Zhang, S.; Ma, H.; Yang, S.; Liu, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y. Chronic intermittent hypobaric hypoxia pretreatment ameliorates ischemia-induced cognitive dysfunction through activation of ERK1/2-CREB-BDNF pathway in anesthetized mice. Neurochem. Res. 2017, 42, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Benkler, C.; Ben-Zur, T.; Barhum, Y.; Offen, D. Altered astrocytic response to activation in SOD1G93A mice and its implications on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathogenesis. Glia 2013, 61, 312–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Maier, O.; Böhm, J.; Dahm, M.; Brück, S.; Beyer, C.; Johann, S. Differentiated NSC-34 motoneuron-like cells as experimental model for cholinergic neurodegeneration. Neurochem. Int. 2013, 62, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Valbuena, G.N.; Rizzardini, M.; Cimini, S.; Siskos, A.P.; Bendotti, C.; Cantoni, L.; Keun, H.C. Metabolomic analysis reveals increased aerobic glycolysis and amino acid deficit in a cellular model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 2222–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jung, H.Y.; Kim, D.W.; Yim, H.S.; Yoo, D.Y.; Kim, J.W.; Won, M.H.; Yoon, Y.S.; Choi, S.Y.; Hwang, I.K. Heme oxygenase-1 protects neurons from ischemic damage by upregulating expression of Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase, catalase, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the rabbit spinal cord. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Seddiqi, N.; Segretain, D.; Bucquoy, S.; Pineau, C.; Jégou, B.; Jollès, P.; Schoentgen, F. Characterization and localization of the rat, mouse and human testicular phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein. Experientia 1996, 52, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hagan, S.; Al-Mulla, F.; Mallon, E.; Oien, K.; Ferrier, R.; Gusterson, B.; García, J.J.; Kolch, W. Reduction of Raf-1 kinase inhibitor protein expression correlates with breast cancer metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 7392–7397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Mulla, F.; Hagan, S.; Behbehani, A.I.; Bitar, M.S.; George, S.S.; Going, J.J.; García, J.J.; Scott, L.; Fyfe, N.; Murray, G.I.; et al. Raf kinase inhibitor protein expression in a survival analysis of colorectal cancer patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 5672–5679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Madji Hounoum, B.; Vourc’h, P.; Felix, R.; Corcia, P.; Patin, F.; Guéguinou, M.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Vandier, C.; Raoul, C.; Andres, C.R.; et al. NSC-34 motor neuron-like cells are unsuitable as experimental model for glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Mulla, F.; Bitar, M.S.; Al-Maghrebi, M.; Behbehani, A.I.; Al-Ali, W.; Rath, O.; Doyle, B.; Tan, K.Y.; Pitt, A.; Kolch, W. Raf kinase inhibitor protein RKIP enhances signaling by glycogen synthase kinase-3β. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 1334–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, W.J.; Pan, S.Q.; Zeng, Y.S.; Su, B.G.; Li, S.M.; Ding, Y.; Li, Y.; Ruan, J.W. Ruan, Identification of acupuncture-specific proteins in the process of electro-acupuncture after spinal cord injury. Neurosci. Res. 2010, 67, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Toyoda, T.; Matsukawa, N.; Sagisaka, T.; Uematsu, N.; Kanamori, T.; Kato, D.; Mizuno, M.; Wake, H.; Hida, H.; Borlongan, C.V.; et al. Suppression of astrocyte lineage in adult hippocampal progenitor cells expressing hippocampal cholinergic neurostimulating peptide precursor in an in vivo ischemic model. Cell Transplant. 2012, 21, 2159–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dinc, C.; Iplikcioglu, A.C.; Atabey, C.; Eroglu, A.; Topuz, K.; Ipcioglu, O.; Demirel, D. Comparison of deferoxamine and methylprednisolone: Protective effect of pharmacological agents on lipid peroxidation in spinal cord injury in rats. Spine 2013, 38, e1649–e1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Praticò, D. F2-isoprostanes: Sensitive and specific non-invasive indices of lipid peroxidation in vivo. Atherosclerosis 1999, 147, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Basu, S. Radioimmunoassay of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2alpha: An index for oxidative injury via free radical catalysed lipid peroxidation. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 1988, 58, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Emmez, H.; Yildirim, Z.; Kale, A.; Tönge, M.; Durdağ, E.; Börcek, A.O.; Uçankuş, L.N.; Doğulu, F.; Kiliç, N.; Baykaner, M.K. Anti-apoptotic and neuroprotective effects of α-lipoic acid on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits. Acta Neurochir. 2010, 152, 1591–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Krawisz, J.E.; Sharon, P.; Stenson, W.F. Quantitative assay for acute intestinal inflammation based on myeloperoxidase activity. Assessment of inflammation in rat and hamster models. Gastroenterology 1984, 87, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, X.G.; Hua, F.; Wang, S.G.; Xu, Y.Y.; Yue, H.T. Phosphodiesterase inhibitor ameliorates neuronal injury in spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injured rat model. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 93, 1213–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fehlings, M.G.; Nguyen, D.H. Immunoglobulin G: A potential treatment to attenuate neuroinflammation following spinal cord injury. J. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 30 (Suppl. 1), S109–S112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hirose, K.; Okajima, K.; Taoka, Y.; Uchiba, M.; Tagami, H.; Nakano, K.; Utoh, J.; Okabe, H.; Kitamura, N. Activated protein C reduces the ischemia/reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury in rats by inhibiting neutrophil activation. Ann. Surg. 2010, 232, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhou, L.; Wang, X.; Xue, W.; Xie, K.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Gong, G.; Zeng, Y. Beneficial effects of hydrogen-rich saline against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits. Brain Res. 2013, 1517, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kurt, G.; Yildirim, Z.; Cemil, B.; Celtikci, E.; Kaplanoglu, G.T. Effects of curcumin on acute spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits. Laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2014, 20, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, K.B.; Uchida, K.; Nakajima, H.; Yayama, T.; Hirai, T.; Rodriguez Guerrero, A.; Kobayashi, S.; Ma, W.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Zhu, P.; et al. High-mobility group box-1 and its receptors contribute to proinflammatory response in the acute phase of spinal cord injury in rats. Spine 2011, 36, 2122–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kikuchi, K.; Uchikado, H.; Miura, N.; Morimoto, Y.; Ito, T.; Tancharoen, S.; Miyata, K.; Sakamoto, R.; Kikuchi, C.; Iida, N.; et al. HMGB1 as a therapeutic target in spinal cord injury: A hypothesis for novel therapy development. Exp. Ther. Med. 2012, 2, 767–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhu, X.L.; Chen, X.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Huo, J.; Wang, Y.; Min, Y.Y.; Su, B.X.; Pei, J.M. Electroacupuncture pretreatment attenuates spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury via inhibition of high-mobility group box 1 production in a LXA4 receptor-dependent manner. Brain Res. 2017, 1659, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 08 01370 g001 550
Figure 1. Purification and expression of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein in NSC34 cells. (A) Generation of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 protein. (B) Western blot analysis for polyhistidine showing the successful purification and expression of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 proteins.
Figure 1. Purification and expression of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein in NSC34 cells. (A) Generation of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 protein. (B) Western blot analysis for polyhistidine showing the successful purification and expression of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 proteins.
Cells 08 01370 g001
Cells 08 01370 g002 550
Figure 2. Transduction efficacy and stability of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein in NSC34 cells. (A) Western blot analysis showing concentration-dependent (0.5–3 μM) cellular expression of polyhistidine for 1 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 treatment. (B) Western blot analysis showing time-dependent (0–60 min) cellular expression of polyhistidine, analyzed after 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 treatment. (C) Western blot analysis showing chronological (1–36 h) intracellular stability of polyhistidine expression for 1 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment. (D) Immunocytochemical staining for polyhistidine in PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 protein for 1 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment. Scale bar = 20 μm. The bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Figure 2. Transduction efficacy and stability of control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 fusion protein in NSC34 cells. (A) Western blot analysis showing concentration-dependent (0.5–3 μM) cellular expression of polyhistidine for 1 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 treatment. (B) Western blot analysis showing time-dependent (0–60 min) cellular expression of polyhistidine, analyzed after 3 μM PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 treatment. (C) Western blot analysis showing chronological (1–36 h) intracellular stability of polyhistidine expression for 1 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment. (D) Immunocytochemical staining for polyhistidine in PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 protein for 1 h after PEP-1-PEBP1 treatment. Scale bar = 20 μm. The bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Cells 08 01370 g002
Cells 08 01370 g003 550
Figure 3. Protective effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 proteins on oxidative damage induced by 1 mM H2O2 treatment in NSC34 cells. (A) ELISA assay results for dose-dependent (0.5–3 μM) viability of NSC34 cells analyzed by WST-1 assay. (B) Immunofluorescent staining for DCF-DA and measurement of ROS production using a fluorescence plate reader. (C) Immunofluorescent staining for TUNEL and quantitative analysis of TNINEL positive cells by cell counting under a phase-contrast microscopy. Scale bar = 50 μm (B and C). (D) Western blot analysis for caspase 3 and cleaved caspase 3 (c-caspase 3) in the NSC34 lysates. Data were analyzed by Student t-test (* p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group) or one-way analysis of variance followed by a Bonferroni’s post-hoc test (a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group; b p < 0.05, significantly different from the vehicle-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Figure 3. Protective effects of PEP-1-PEBP1 and control-PEBP1 proteins on oxidative damage induced by 1 mM H2O2 treatment in NSC34 cells. (A) ELISA assay results for dose-dependent (0.5–3 μM) viability of NSC34 cells analyzed by WST-1 assay. (B) Immunofluorescent staining for DCF-DA and measurement of ROS production using a fluorescence plate reader. (C) Immunofluorescent staining for TUNEL and quantitative analysis of TNINEL positive cells by cell counting under a phase-contrast microscopy. Scale bar = 50 μm (B and C). (D) Western blot analysis for caspase 3 and cleaved caspase 3 (c-caspase 3) in the NSC34 lysates. Data were analyzed by Student t-test (* p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group) or one-way analysis of variance followed by a Bonferroni’s post-hoc test (a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group; b p < 0.05, significantly different from the vehicle-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Cells 08 01370 g003
Cells 08 01370 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of PEP-1-PEBP1 protein against ischemic damage in the rabbit spinal cord. (A) Neurological deficits are assessed by Tarlov’s criteria 24 h and 72 h after reperfusion (n = 10 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate SEM. (B) Immunohistochemistry for NeuN to label the surviving neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion. The number of NeuN-positive nuclei per section in all the groups is also shown (n = 5 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate confidence interval or standard errors of mean.
Figure 4. Effect of PEP-1-PEBP1 protein against ischemic damage in the rabbit spinal cord. (A) Neurological deficits are assessed by Tarlov’s criteria 24 h and 72 h after reperfusion (n = 10 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate SEM. (B) Immunohistochemistry for NeuN to label the surviving neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion. The number of NeuN-positive nuclei per section in all the groups is also shown (n = 5 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate confidence interval or standard errors of mean.
Cells 08 01370 g004
Cells 08 01370 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of Control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 protein on cell death and caspase 3 expression in the rabbit spinal cord against ischemic damage. Fluoro-Jade B (FJB) staining is conducted to detect the degenerating cells in the spinal cord 72 h after reperfusion. The number of FJB-positive cells in all the groups is also shown. Western blot analysis for caspase 3 and cleaved caspase 3 (c-caspase 3) in the spinal cord homogenates is conducted to compare the caspase 3 dependent neuronal death in spinal cord (n = 5 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate confidence interval or standard errors of mean.
Figure 5. Effect of Control-PEBP1 and PEP-1-PEBP1 protein on cell death and caspase 3 expression in the rabbit spinal cord against ischemic damage. Fluoro-Jade B (FJB) staining is conducted to detect the degenerating cells in the spinal cord 72 h after reperfusion. The number of FJB-positive cells in all the groups is also shown. Western blot analysis for caspase 3 and cleaved caspase 3 (c-caspase 3) in the spinal cord homogenates is conducted to compare the caspase 3 dependent neuronal death in spinal cord (n = 5 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group; c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate confidence interval or standard errors of mean.
Cells 08 01370 g005
Cells 08 01370 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of Control-PEBP or PEP-1-PEBP1 on MDA, AOPP, 8-iso-PGF2α, MPO, TNF-α, and HMGB in the spinal cord 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion (n = 5 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group, c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate confidence interval.
Figure 6. Effects of Control-PEBP or PEP-1-PEBP1 on MDA, AOPP, 8-iso-PGF2α, MPO, TNF-α, and HMGB in the spinal cord 72 h after ischemia/reperfusion (n = 5 per group; a p < 0.05, significantly different from the control group, b p < 0.05, significantly different from the PEP-1 peptide-treated group, c p < 0.05, significantly different from the control-PEBP1-treated group). The bars indicate confidence interval.
Cells 08 01370 g006
Table
Table 1. Physiological parameters 10 min before and after ischemic surgery.
Table 1. Physiological parameters 10 min before and after ischemic surgery.
pHDistal MAP (mmHg)PaCO2 (mmHg)PaO2 (mmHg)Glu (mM)
Pre-ischemia
 Control7.38 ± 0.0383.6 ± 8.8537.0 ± 3.92105.2 ± 8.816.39 ± 1.23
 Vehicle7.39 ± 0.0383.9 ± 8.5336.7 ± 3.56102.3 ± 8.356.34 ± 1.09
 Control-PEBP1 (10 mg/kg)7.43 ± 0.0484.1 ± 9.1037.2 ± 4.09103.1 ± 9.026.42 ± 0.88
 PEP-1-PEBP1 (1 mg/kg)7.41 ± 0.0483.4 ± 9.1137.1 ± 4.55104.2 ± 9.446.37 ± 1.03
 PEP-1-PEBP1 (3 mg/kg)7.43 ± 0.0383.8 ± 8.9536.8 ± 3.94106.3 ± 9.216.48 ± 1.31
 PEP-1-PEBP1 (10 mg/kg)7.42 ± 0.0483.5 ± 8.6637.1 ± 4.45106.9 ± 10.26.40 ± 1.07
Reperfusion 10 min
 Control7.40 ± 0.0484.8 ± 8.9936.6 ± 3.96107.4 ± 9.816.46 ± 0.98
 Vehicle7.37 ± 0.0787.2 ± 10.239.4 ± 5.18108.1 ± 9.606.93 ± 1.44
 Control-PEBP1 (10 mg/kg)7.35 ± 0.0987.5 ± 11.338.8 ± 4.82110.9 ± 10.87.05 ± 1.28
 PEP-1-PEBP1 (1 mg/kg)7.36 ± 0.0688.2 ± 9.5839.6 ± 6.02106.5 ± 10.67.12 ± 1.36
 PEP-1-PEBP1 (3 mg/kg)7.37 ± 0.0886.9 ± 9.8338.4 ± 4.88113.1 ± 12.27.07 ± 1.20
 PEP-1-PEBP1 (10 mg/kg)7.37 ± 0.1085.2 ± 8.8638.3 ± 5.03109.8 ± 11.27.19 ± 1.24
There are no significant changes in physiological parameters in control, vehicle-treated, control-PEBP1-treated, and PEP-1-PEBP1-treated groups before ischemic surgery and 10 min after reperfusion.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, W.; Cho, S.B.; Jung, H.Y.; Yoo, D.Y.; Oh, J.K.; Choi, G.-M.; Cho, T.-G.; Kim, D.W.; Hwang, I.K.; Choi, S.Y.; et al. Phosphatidylethanolamine-Binding Protein 1 Ameliorates Ischemia-Induced Inflammation and Neuronal Damage in the Rabbit Spinal Cord. Cells 2019, 8, 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111370

AMA Style

Kim W, Cho SB, Jung HY, Yoo DY, Oh JK, Choi G-M, Cho T-G, Kim DW, Hwang IK, Choi SY, et al. Phosphatidylethanolamine-Binding Protein 1 Ameliorates Ischemia-Induced Inflammation and Neuronal Damage in the Rabbit Spinal Cord. Cells. 2019; 8(11):1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Woosuk, Su Bin Cho, Hyo Young Jung, Dae Young Yoo, Jae Keun Oh, Goang-Min Choi, Tack-Geun Cho, Dae Won Kim, In Koo Hwang, Soo Young Choi, and et al. 2019. "Phosphatidylethanolamine-Binding Protein 1 Ameliorates Ischemia-Induced Inflammation and Neuronal Damage in the Rabbit Spinal Cord" Cells 8, no. 11: 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111370

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop