Next Article in Journal
Early Development of an Innovative Nanoparticle-Based Multimodal Tool for Targeted Drug Delivery: A Step-by-Step Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Expanding the Use of SGLT2 Inhibitors in T2D Patients Across Clinical Settings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Schwann Cell Differentiation from Human Adipose Stem Cells with Metabolic Glycoengineering
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/cells14090669
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Adipose Tissue-Derived Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Multifaceted Mechanisms and Clinical Prospects

by
Hanwen Zhang
*,
Oliver Felthaus
and
Lukas Prantl
Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2025, 14(9), 669; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090669
Submission received: 9 April 2025 / Revised: 28 April 2025 / Accepted: 1 May 2025 / Published: 2 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Research on Adipose Stem Cells)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that significantly impacts quality of life and poses a growing economic burden. Adipose tissue-derived therapies, including both cell-based and cell-free products, have shown promising potential in promoting cartilage repair, modulating inflammation, and improving joint function. Recent studies and clinical trials have demonstrated their regenerative effects, highlighting their feasibility as a novel treatment approach for OA. This review summarises the therapeutic mechanisms and latest advancements in adipose tissue-derived therapies, providing insights into their clinical applications and future prospects.

1. Introduction

According to the latest Global Burden of Disease (GBD) update, osteoarthritis (OA) has affected 7.6% of the world’s population (approximately 595 million people) [1]. This rising incidence imposes a heavy physical, social, and economic burden on patients [2]. Currently, clinical improvement is mainly achieved through pharmacological interventions (e.g., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intra-articular injections (hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, and platelet-rich plasma), and surgical means (cartilage grafting, arthroplasty, etc.) [3,4,5,6,7]. However, these treatments do not reverse the pathophysiology of OA and are often limited by drug addiction, complications (e.g., gastrointestinal or cardiovascular issues), and risks of invasive procedures [8,9,10]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore and develop innovative therapies that can target the pathophysiology of OA.
Recent studies have shown that adipose tissue and its derivatives have become a therapeutic tool of interest in the field of regenerative medicine due to their abundant sources, easy accessibility, and less ethical constraints [11,12]. Such derivatives include both cellular products such as microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), adipose tissue stromal vascular rich fraction (SVF), dedifferentiated adipocytes (DFAT), adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs), and non-cellular products such as adipose-derived stem cell extracellular vesicles (ADSC-EVs) and cell-free fat extracts (CEFFEs) [13,14,15,16,17]. Different derivatives have their own advantages and may reduce OA symptoms through multiple mechanisms (modulating the inflammatory microenvironment, promoting cartilage repair, etc.). Both preclinical and clinical studies have shown that adipose tissue-derived therapies have great potential to promote cartilage regeneration, reduce inflammation, and improve joint function.
With this in mind, the aim of this review is to summarise the latest advances in the use of adipose tissue and its derivatives for the treatment of OA. We will focus on their biological mechanisms, efficacy and clinical feasibility, and analyse the advantages and limitations of each approach. By integrating the latest research findings, this review seeks to provide researchers and clinicians in the field with a comprehensive view of the potential value of adipose-derived therapies in the treatment of OA, and to further help meet the unmet clinical needs.

2. Microfragmented Adipose Tissue in OA

Most MFAT is obtained from adipose tissue by conventional liposuction and then placed in a mechanical treatment cassette, such as Lipogems®, for gentle mechanical treatment and filtration to remove erythrocytes and oil residues [18]. However, it has been shown that adipose tissue microfragmentation can also be performed without specialised equipment [19]. This cell-enriched lipotransfer (CELT) has already shown very good results in soft tissue augmentation. MFAT, as a purely physical treatment, is effective in avoiding issues such as cell contamination and biosafety compared to enzymatic methods [20,21]. It has been shown that MFAT is enriched with ADSCs and has a high angiogenic potential [18,22]. Also, MFAT injected into the joints may provide a bioscaffolding function and reduce the mechanical load on cartilage [23]. In an OA rat model, intra-articular injection of MFAT enhanced cartilage repair and chondrocyte migration. Researchers have hypothesised that MFAT acts as a ‘natural scaffold’ that secretes growth factors and extracellular vesicles (EVs) in the joint environment, further promoting cartilage repair [24]. In another study, MFAT was found to reverse tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-induced inflammation and regulate the target gene KLHL29 by upregulating the expression of miR-92a-3p, thereby improving the biological function of OA synoviocytes [25]. Figure 1 briefly depicts the mechanism of action of MFAT.
In recent years, MFAT for OA has achieved good results in clinical practice (Table 1). In patients with knee OA, Boric et al. observed a significant increase in glycosaminoglycan content in articular cartilage after 24 months of intra-articular MFAT injection [26]. Another one-year follow-up study of 110 patients with knee OA showed that intra-articular injection of MFAT significantly improved pain (visual analogue scale, VAS) scores, joint function, and quality of life [27]. However, some authors have reported that although symptomatic relief was achieved early after MFAT injection, only about 45% of patients maintained sustained improvement after 12 months [28]. On the other hand, Gobbi et al. found that MFAT had a sustained effect on joint function and quality of life in OA patients with Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grades of II-IV at a 2-year follow-up [29]. Russo et al. pointed out that the higher the KL grade, the better the clinical outcome. MFAT can also be used as an alternative for patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo arthroplasty [30]. Onorato et al. further demonstrated that MFAT still has a positive long-term effect in patients with early OA at a 4-year follow-up [13]. Additionally, in the latest randomised controlled trial (RCT) study, MFAT was shown to significantly improve the VAS, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores compared to a control group with intra-articular steroid and saline injections [31].
In addition to the knee, MFAT also performs well in injection therapy for other joints, such as the ankle and the hip [32,33,34]. Some clinical studies have shown significant improvement in pain and functional scores in patients with mild to moderate shoulder OA after articular injection of MFAT [35,36]. However, in a study by Baria et al., the body mass index (BMI) was found to be negatively correlated with treatment outcome scores in a population of patients treated with MFAT [37]. This may be due to the fact that people with a high BMI have higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, etc.) within their fat, which leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of MFAT [38]. Overall, MFAT has demonstrated good safety and efficacy in clinical applications, but its specific mechanism still requires more in-depth research.
Table 1. Clinical studies of MFAT in the treatment of OA.
Table 1. Clinical studies of MFAT in the treatment of OA.
TimeCountryPatient NumberPosition (KL)Age (Mean, Years)Follow-UpResultsComplicationsReference
2017Croatia17 (12M/5F)Knee OA (III-IV) 69 ± 12 12 months↑ GAG
↓ VAS, CRP		None[39]
2019USA35 (12M/23F)Knee OA(I-IV)63 ± 111.09 ± 0.49 year ↓ VAS
↑ KOOS, EQOL score		None[40]
2019Croatia10Knee OA(III-IV) 69 ± 12 24 months↑ GAGNone[26]
2020UK110 (60M/50F)Knee OA(I-IV)42–9412 months↓ VAS
↑ OKS, EQ-5D		None[27]
2020USA25GHJ OA (II-IV) >40 12 months↓ VAS, DASH
↑ GHJ space		None[36]
2021United Arab Emirates,
USA, Italy		75 (34.7%M/65.3%F)Knee OA (II-IV)69.624 months↓ VAS,
↑ KOOS—ADL, KOOS-Pain		Adipose tissue harvest site pain (49% of patients) and
swelling/bruising (28% of patients); knee swelling (13% of patients)		[29]
2021Belgium64 (48.4%M/51.6%F)Knee OA (I-IV) 54.2 ± 9.1 12 months↓ VAS
↑ KOOS—ADL, QOL; EQ-5D		Knee pain, swelling, and stiffness (79% of patients); knee instability (2 patients) and calf muscle soreness (1 patient)[28]
2021UK220 (125M/95F)Knee OA (III-IV)-24 months↑ EQ-5D, OKSAdipose tissue harvest site pain and bleeding (6%, 4% of patients); Knee pain and swelling (14% of patients); severe reactions to injections (1 patient)[41]
2022Italy202 (97M/105F)Knee OA (I-IV) 54.0 ± 9.0 24.5 ± 9.6 months↓ VAS
↑ KOOS		None[42]
2022Italy53 (28M/25F)Knee OA (I-IV) 54.5 ± 12.1 24 months↓ VAS
↑ IKDC Subjective scoring, KOOS-Pain		Mild or moderate knee pain, joint swelling and/or effusion (10 patients), pain and oedema in the treated leg (1 patient)[43]
2022Italy55 (22M/33F)Hip OA (I-IV) 52.5 ± 10.9 35 ± 6 months↑ OHSAdipose tissue harvest site bruising (1 patient)[33]
2023UK46 (28M/18F)
13 (4M/9F)		Knee OA (I-IV)
GHJ OA (III-IV)		 66.9 ± 1.0
64.2 ± 2.4 		52 weeks↓ VAS, DASH
↑ OKS, Lysholm score		None[44]
2023China20 (8M/12F)Knee OA (I-IV) 54.63 ± 3.90 18 months↓ VAS, WOMAC score (%)
↑ HSS, KSS, knee oedema		None[45]
2024USA26 (8M/18F)Knee OA (I-IV) 56.7 ± 7.8 12 months↓ VAS
↑ KOOS, Tegner score		None[46]
2025USA23 (15M/8F)Knee OA (I-IV) 62.6 12 months↓ VAS, WOMAC score (%)
↑ KOOS		Adipose tissue harvest site morbidity of mild pain and ecchymosis (minimal patients)[31]
M: male; F: female; KL: Kellgren–Lawrence; GAG: glycosaminoglycan; ADL, activity of daily living; QOL, quality of life; EQOL, Emory Quality of Life; OKS, Oxford Knee Score; EQ-5D, EuroQuol 5D; GHJ, glenohumeral joint; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; OHS, Oxford Hip Score; HSS, Hospital for Special Surgery score; KSS, The Knee Society Score; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; VAS, visual analogue scale; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.

3. Adipose Tissue Stromal Vascular Rich Fraction in OA

SVF is a mixed cell population that can be obtained by mechanical treatment or enzymatic digestion of adipose tissue. SVF mainly comprises vascular-derived cells such as ADSCs, macrophages, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and pericytes [21]. It has been found that SVF and ADSCs have similar effects in the treatment of a rat OA model [47] (Figure 1). Anjiki et al. found that SVF was mainly enriched with M2-type macrophages. SVF treatment enhances chondrocytes’ collagen II and SOX9 expression, thereby maintaining chondrocyte homeostasis [48]. In a further study, it was found that M2 macrophages in SVF were paracrine-regulated via the Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-induced Smad2/3 phosphorylation pathway to support cartilage regeneration [49]. Recently, Onoi et al. showed that M2 macrophages in SVF can act directly on OA tissue to promote the secretion of growth factors and chondroprotective cytokines [50].
The results of several clinical studies have shown that SVF offers significant advantages in the treatment of OA (Table 2). A double-blind, randomised, self-controlled trial showed that patients receiving SVF injections had better WOMAC and VAS scores and knee mobility than hyaluronic acid controls, accompanied by better cartilage repair [51]. In another study, Tsubosaka et al. followed up on patients who received intra-articular knee injections of 2.5 × 107 SVF cells and reported significant improvements in the WOMAC, VAS, and KOOS scores at 6 and 12 months postoperatively [52]. A systematic review that included 200 patients showed that SVF can be used as a complementary treatment for patients who have failed conservative and arthroscopic treatments, and can be used as a combination of ADSCs, PRP, etc. [53]. Another study compared the effects of different doses (2.5 × 107 versus 5.0 × 107 cells) of SVF in the treatment of OA and showed that the total KOOS and symptom scores of the high-dose group were significantly better than those of the low-dose group at 12 months postoperatively [54]. However, at a mid-term follow-up, a significant improvement in function within 2 years after SVF injection was found, but this effect began to diminish by the third year [55]. Of interest, Rogers et al. produced SVF (PSG-01) for the first time with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and through Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), and conducted a phase 1/2A prospective clinical study (NCT 04043819) in OA patients with KL grades of II-IV. The results confirmed that a single intrathecal injection of SVF into the knee joint was not only safe and reliable, but also significantly improved pain and function [56]. Others have mechanically obtained SVF with a viable cell percentage of 64.43%, and 33 patients who received an intra-articular injection of SVF into the knee joint showed significant improvement in VAS scores and the KOOS after 12 months [57]. Similarly, Labarre et al. obtained SVF by mechanical treatment and injected it into the infrapatellar (Hoffa) fat pad. At a 2-year follow-up, it was found that site-specific injections of SVF also improved pain and function in patients with severe OA [58]. A recent meta-analysis showed that SVF significantly improved pain and function in patients with OA of the knee compared to saline and hyaluronic acid, but the short-term advantage over corticosteroids was not significant [59]. In the short term, SVF has also been shown to be effective in improving pain and function in patients with hip OA, and is particularly effective in KL grade II patients [60]. Overall, SVF demonstrated some effectiveness and safety in the short-term treatment of OA. It is necessary for future studies to explore how to prolong the efficacy of SVF and elucidate its mechanism of action in larger randomised controlled trials and with longer-term follow-up, with a view to achieving more durable and stable clinical benefits in the treatment of OA.

4. Dedifferentiated Adipocytes in OA

In 1986, Sugihara et al. first proposed a technique called ‘ceiling culture’ to obtain DFAT cells in mature adipose tissue [71]. In 2008, Matsumoto et al. found that DFAT has the ability to differentiate into a variety of mesenchymal cell lineages similar to ADSCs [72]. Adipose tissue was digested with digestive enzymes and then the adipocytes were placed in culture medium. Due to their buoyancy, mature adipocytes floated in the medium and, over time, the adipocytes lost significant amounts of lipid (Figure 2). As a result, the adipocytes became more elongated in shape and eventually transformed into a fibroblast-like cell morphology [73,74]. In addition, some studies have found that adipose dedifferentiation can also be induced by modulating TGF-β1 signalling followed by the induction of related genes or by altering the extracellular osmotic pressure [75,76]. DFAT cells are considered analogues of ADSCs due to their strong proliferative and multidifferentiation capacity [72,77]. Compared to pluripotent stem cells, DFAT has a lower risk of tumourigenesis [78]. In in vitro experiments, DFAT can differentiate into various cell types such as chondrocytes, osteoblasts, myocytes, and vascular endothelial cells [79,80,81]. In a rat cartilage defect model, DFAT-derived cell microcolonies significantly promoted cartilage repair [77]. A follow-up study further demonstrated that DFAT could highly express genes related to cartilage protection (e.g., Proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) and Bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP6)) and could inhibit the expression of ADAMTS4 and IL6 when stimulated by inflammatory factors [82]. In another study, infrapatellar fat pad-DFAT was shown to be superior to infrapatellar fat pad adipose stromal cells in terms of the chondrogenic capacity [83]. Table 3 presents information about DFAT’s progress in the field of regenerative medicine.
Although existing evidence shows that DFAT has potential value in cartilage regeneration and inflammation modulation, its biosafety and cell purity need to be studied in depth and its clinical application is still in the early exploratory stage [74]. As the safety and mechanism of DFAT are further studied in the future, the therapeutic potential of DFAT in degenerative diseases such as OA is still worthy of investigation.

5. Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells in OA

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been widely shown to reduce inflammatory responses in the arthritic setting [104,105,106,107,108]. In addition to bone marrow and adipose tissue, MSCs can also originate from a variety of human tissues such as neonatal cord blood and placenta [109,110,111,112]. However, the number of ADSCs in an equal volume of adipose tissue and bone marrow tissue is approximately 500 times that of bone marrow MSCs [113,114]. In a meta-analysis, adipose-derived MSCs were shown to be superior to bone marrow-derived MSCs in terms of safety and ability to improve function [115]. ADSCs have received increasing attention as an easily accessible and abundant pluripotent stem cell resource [116,117].
ADSCs have been shown in several animal studies to play an important role in synovial and cartilage protection. For example, ADSCs can inhibit synovial inflammation by downregulating S100A8/A9 and P2 × 7 receptors and reduce the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13), thereby slowing down cartilage degradation [118,119,120]. Xu et al. found that ADSCs inhibited the TNF-α-induced chondrocyte pyroptosis signalling pathway [121]. Recent studies have also indicated that upregulation of IL-6 in ADSCs enhances immunomodulation and inhibits nuclear factor κ-Β receptor activator ligand (RANKL), thereby reducing cartilage degeneration [122].
In terms of clinical studies, a significant improvement in VAS scores and KOOS was found in 42 patients who received intra-articular injections of ADSCs, and an increase in the injection dose did not provide a benefit at a 12-month postoperative follow-up [67]. Hosono et al. also stated that multiple injections of ADSCs may present with severe arthritis and the aberrant expression of histone H2B antibodies [123]. Another study reported that those patients who underwent medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) followed by articular injection of ADSCs observed better cartilage regeneration by arthroscopy 2 years later [124]. Hatano et al. found that intra-articular ADSC injections improved hip function within 6 months. Female patients and patients with moderate hip OA showed better outcomes [125].
An allogeneic human ADSC product (ELIXCYTE ®) showed a favourable safety and tolerability profile in a Phase I/II OA clinical trial (NCT02784964) [126]. It was also found to control the progression of OA by lowering MMP13 and increasing levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1RA, IL-10, and IL-13) in a follow-up study [127]. In conclusion, ADSCs show promising opportunities for applications in tissue repair and inflammation regulation in OA, and more large-scale clinical trials and in-depth mechanistic studies are needed to optimise their efficacy and safety in the future.

6. Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles in OA

In 1981, Trams et al. proposed that cells can secrete nanoscale vesicles with biological functions and introduced the concept of ‘exosomes’ [128]. However, the latest guidelines of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) from 2023 recommend the use of ‘extracellular vesicles’, avoiding terms based on biogenesis such as ‘exosome’ [129]. Therefore, in this article, EVs are used as a blanket term. ADSC-EVs play a key role in mediating therapeutic effects such as angiogenesis, inflammation control, and tissue repair [130,131,132]. EVs are less immunogenic, have a lower risk of embolisation, and are more stable than cell-based therapies [133,134,135] (Figure 3) (Table 4).

6.1. ADSC-EVs and the Regulation of Inflammation in OA

Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) play a key role in the pathological process of OA [136,137]. Meanwhile, IL-1 and TNF-α also induce cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and increase the release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), further exacerbating the inflammatory response [138]. As a result, there has been a proliferation of studies that demonstrate inhibition of the inflammatory response to improve OA. Liu et al. used anion-exchange chromatography to isolate EVs from infrapatellar fat pad-derived MSCs, which were injected into the joints of OA mouse models. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in chondrocytes were found to be significantly reduced and controlled the progression of OA [139]. ADSC-EVs treated with synovial fluid from OA patients secrete miRNAs with chondroprotective functions (miR-193b-3p, miR-24-3p, and miR-92a-3p with miR-21-5p) [140]. Notably, an appropriate hypoxic microenvironment is beneficial to MSC function [141]. Correspondingly, hypoxia-induced ADSC-EVs slowed down OA progression by suppressing the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [142]. ADSC-EVs pretreated with IFN γ secreted miRNA to upregulate the M2 macrophage marker CD163, and downregulated the chondrocyte inflammation marker Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1) [143]. ADSC-EVs also inhibit M1 macrophages in the synovium and downregulate A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 9 (ADAMTS9), which further suppresses inflammation and alleviates OA progression [144,145].

6.2. ADSC-EVs Promote Cartilage Repair

The role of ADSC-EVs in OA cartilage repair has also attracted much attention (Figure 3). Zhao et al. found that ADSC-EVs upregulated miR-145 and miR-221 in chondrocytes, thereby enhancing cartilage formation [146]. Tofiño-Vian et al. demonstrated that ADSC-EVs reduced matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity and MMP-13 release, while promoting the production of type II collagen and anti-inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-10) [147]. By co-culturing ADSC-EVs with a cartilage injury model, sox9, hyaline cartilage-specific gene aggrecan (Acan), and col2a1 protein secretion could be promoted, contributing to cartilage regenerative effects [148].

6.3. Promotion of Chondrocyte Autophagy

In the pathological setting of OA, the level of autophagy in chondrocytes is generally reduced, especially in aged chondrocytes [149,150]. This reduced autophagy is thought to be closely related to chondrocyte death and matrix degeneration. Studies have shown that infrapatellar fat pad-derived EVs can inhibit the mTOR signalling pathway via miR-100-5p to enhance chondrocyte autophagy [151]. ADSC-EVs also upregulate peroxidase 6 (Prdx6) and the autophagy marker LC3B, thereby protecting chondrocytes [152]. Meng et al. found that ADSC-EVs could regulate autophagy and promote chondrocyte repair by promoting FEZ2 through miR-429 in an OA mouse model [153].

6.4. Engineering ADSC-EVs

To further enhance the therapeutic potential of ADSC-EVs, studies have focused on their genetic or material modification in recent years (Figure 3). By upregulating miR-376c-3p, the WNT-β-catenin signalling pathway could be inhibited to alleviate chondrocyte apoptosis and synovial fibrosis [154]. Zhao et al. effectively ameliorated the pathological changes in cartilage by engineering subcutaneous adipose ADSC-EVs with targeted delivery of miR-199a-3p [155]. Li et al. used miR-338-3p to modify ADSC-EVs to target RUNX2 expression to inhibit chondrocyte inflammation and degradation [156]. It has also been shown that the miR-99b-3p modification of ADSC-EVs followed by hydrogel particle (HMP) encapsulation could achieve sustained local drug release for OA [157]. By culturing ADSCs on hyaluronic acid (HA)-coated surfaces, CD44-enriched ADSC-EVs could be obtained, which could downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression in OA models [158]. Combining ADSC-EVs with 3D-printed specific biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds effectively promoted cartilage regeneration in a rat model [159]. A recent study also found that TNF-α pretreatment of infrapatellar fat pad-derived EVs activated the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway and increased the secretion of EVs, while ameliorating the arthropathological changes in OA mice [160]. As a novel cell-free therapeutic tool, ADSC-EVs not only demonstrated significant advantages in the modulation of inflammation and cartilage repair in the pathological setting of OA, but also could be engineered to further enhance targeting and therapeutic potential. In the future, large-scale randomised controlled clinical trials and in-depth mechanistic studies will help to clarify the optimal preparation process, dosage, and administration timing of ADSC-EVs, and provide safer, more effective and personalised precision treatment options for OA.
Table 4. ADSC-EVs and OA research.
Table 4. ADSC-EVs and OA research.
TimeModelMoulding MethodMechanismResultsReference
2017OA osteoblastsIL-1β↓ HNE-modified proteins
↑ mitochondrial membrane potential		↓ ageing-related β-galactosidase activity and γ H2AX, IL-6, PGE 2[161]
2018OA chondrocytesIL-1β↓ NF-κB and activator protein-1
↑ membrane-bound protein A1		↓ PGE 2, MMP-13
↑ IL-10, collagen II		[147]
2020OA chondrocytes; ratsIL-1β, MIA, DMM-↑ chondrocyte proliferation and migration, collagen II
↓ MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-13, and ADAMTS-5, M1 Macrophage infiltration		[144]
2020OA chondrocytes, synovial fibroblasts, periosteal cellsH2O2↑ miR-145, miR-221
Wnt/β-catenin pathway		↓ IL-6, NF-κB, TNF-α
↑ IL-10, Collagen II and β-catenin		[146]
2021OA chondrocytes, synovial cellsIL-1β↓ NF-κB pathway↓ IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MMP-1, MMP-10 and ADAMTS5[162]
2021OA chondrocytesIL-1βPeroxidase 6↓ IL-6, MMP-13
↑ autophagy protein LC3B		[152]
2022OA chondrocytes, synovial cellIL-1β↓ NF-κB pathway↓ IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, COX-2 and VEGF, MMP-1, MMP-13 and ADAMTS-4, TNF-α[163]
2022OA chondrocytes, synovial cell,
mice		IL-1β, DMM↓ endoplasmic reticulum stress (miR-486-5p)↓M1 macrophage, IL-6, TNF-α, MMP13
↓ CHOP, Caspase-3 and GRP78
↑ collagen II		[164]
2022OA chondrocytes, synovial cells,
rats		IL-1β, lipopolysaccharide, MIA Targets the WNT-β-catenin pathway (MicroRNA-376c-3p) ↑ collagen II, β-catenin, Aggrecan
↓ TNF-α and IL-6, IL-1β, IFN-γ, α-SMA and collagen III, MMP13, ADAMTS5		[154]
2023RatsIL-1β Targets ADAMTS9 to activate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (miR-93-5p) ↓ IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and iNOS[145]
2023 Primary articular chondrocytes,
rats 		IL-1β, ACLT Protoelastin induces miR-451-5p ↑ collagen II and SOX 9; cartilage ECM
↑ OARSI and Mankin scores		[165]
2023 Primary articular chondrocytes,
rats 		IL-1β, MIAmiR-429 targets FEZ2↑ chondrocyte autophagy[153]
2023 Primary articular chondrocytes,
rats 		IL-1β, ACLT Hypoxia inhibits SASP secretion ↓ ADAMTS5, MMP13, IL-6, and TNF-α
↑ proteoglycans and collagen II		[142]
ACLT: anterior cruciate ligament severance; SASP: senescence-associated secretory phenotype, DMM: destabilisation of the medial meniscus, MIA: monosodium iodoacetate; IL, interleukin; HNE, hydroxynonenal; NF-κB, Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; MCP-1, Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1; COX-2, Cyclooxygenase-2; VEGF, Vascular endothelial growth factor; γ-H2AX, γ-Hydroxybutyric acid; PGE 2, Prostaglandin E2; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; ADAMTS5, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α, CHOP, C/EBP homologous protein; GRP78, 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; SOX, Sex-determining region Y -box; ECM, Cartilage extracellular matrix; OARSI, Osteoarthritis Research Society International; FEZ2, Fasciculation And Elongation Protein Zeta 2; SASP; senescence-associated secretory phenotype.

7. Cell-Free Fat Extracts for OA

To prepare CEFFE, adipose tissue obtained after liposuction was washed with saline, centrifuged, mechanically emulsified, chilled at −80 °C, cryocycled, and subsequently re-centrifuged to obtain four layers of liquid (Figure 4). A cell-free aqueous extract was obtained by taking the third layer of the liquid and filtering it through a 0.22 μm filter to remove the cellular components [166]. In a mouse model of ischaemia, CEFFE was found to contain several growth factors (e.g., BDNF, GDNF, TGF-β, etc.) and significantly promote angiogenesis [166]. In recent years, studies have further demonstrated that CEFFE accelerates angiogenesis, thereby improving flap survival and the quality of expanded skin [167,168]. It also improves fertility by increasing anti-Müllerian hormone, estradiol (E2), and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in ovarian insufficiency (POI) mice [169]. In addition, CEFFE can increase the number of CD31-positive capillaries and Ki67-positive cells in a mouse model of androgenetic alopecia, thereby reducing hair loss [170].
In terms of OA treatment, Jia et al. found that CEFFE upregulated the proportion of CD206+ macrophages in the synovial membrane in an OA rat model experiment. In in vitro experiments, CEFFE inhibited the expression of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 (ADAMTS-5) in chondrocytes, while upregulating SOX-9 [17]. In further studies, it was shown that membrane-linked protein (Annexin) A5 in CEFFE inhibited M1-type macrophage polarisation by promoting the endocytosis and degradation of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, which reduced inflammatory factor levels and protected chondrocytes, and that Annexin A5 significantly relieved joint pain and attenuated cartilage damage in an animal model [171]. Taken together, these findings provide new potential directions for the application of CEFFE and its active ingredients in OA therapy.

8. Controversies and Challenges

As adipose tissue derivatives are increasingly studied in the treatment of OA, their clinical translation still faces many controversies and challenges. Firstly, there is no consensus on the need for enzymatic digestion of adipose tissue: mechanical treatment often makes it difficult to sufficiently disrupt the extracellular matrix, resulting in a large number of cells trapped in tissue debris [172]. In contrast, enzymatic digestion yields higher numbers of progenitor cells, but at the same time, has the potential to impair the functional expression of ADSCs [173,174]. Although enzymatic digestion is approximately 1000-fold more efficient than mechanical processing [175,176], mechanical processing of adipose tissue is shorter and more cost-effective [19,177]. There are no globally harmonised standards of operation. Preparation methods vary greatly from organisation to organisation, resulting in inconsistent cell activity, purity, content, and safety results.
In practice, there are multiple operational steps whether enzymatic digestion or mechanical separation is used, potentially increasing the risk of infection. In order to reduce contamination, studies have attempted to use techniques such as closed mechanical processing systems and three-step collection systems [178]. In addition, some studies have suggested that stem cells may be precursor cells for solid tumours due to their vasculogenic and immunomodulatory functions [179,180]. ADSCs have been found to be potential initiators of synovial sarcoma [181]. Koellensperger et al. have observed that ADSCs enhance gene expression and angiogenesis in breast cancer cells in vitro [182]. However, it has also been found that stem cells cultured for a long period of time may undergo genomic alterations but do not cause cancer [183,184]. Although no clinical trials have reported malignant transformations of ADSCs, the long-term safety of ADSCs should be continuously monitored with genetic safety testing and follow-up. In addition, due to the vascularisation and osteogenic potential of ADSCs, their intra-articular use may induce ectopic osteogenesis or chondrogenesis, which may interfere with the original joint structure, and even cause pain or osteophytes. The above controversies and potential risks highlight the need for further in-depth research and standardisation in the treatment of OA with fat derivatives.

9. Regulations and Limitations

Currently, no products related to EVs have been approved worldwide for any use, and the FDA classifies exosomes as biological products [185]. Therefore, safety and efficacy verification of the product is required. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) considers any substantially manipulated cell therapy such as adipose stem cells (ASCs) to be an advanced therapeutic medicine and is therefore closely regulated [186]. SVF involves mechanical or enzymatic processing, and it is difficult to distinguish between minimal and advanced manipulation. As a result, SVF products are often categorised as requiring high standards of approval, and the FDA has also classified SVF as a biological product requiring clinical trials (Product 351) [187]. This means that SVF products must undergo the same level of safety and efficacy clinical trials as new drugs, which is a complex and costly process.

10. Current Status and Future Perspectives

Adipose tissue-derived therapies are increasingly used in the treatment of OA, but there is still a lack of uniformity in their efficacy. Nguyen et al. recently compared the efficacy of ADSCs and SVF in 452 patients with OA. They found that ADSCs provided longer-lasting pain relief, while SVF showed a faster onset of action. ADSCs were also more effective in promoting cartilage regeneration. The authors suggested that SVF may be more suitable for older patients or those with a BMI greater than 30 [188]. However, another meta-analysis reported that autologous cultured ADSCs began to relieve pain at around 3 months post-treatment, while SVF took up to 12 months to show significant effects [189]. Maeda et al. conducted a retrospective study of 72 patients with OA treated with either SVF or MFAT. They found that MFAT treatment resulted in greater improvements in knee flexion and cartilage quality, while SVF treatment resulted in faster pain relief [190]. Some meta-analyses of RCTs showed that ADSCs and SVF had a similar short-term efficacy [191,192]. Another meta-analysis, which included 79 RCTs, found that SVF was more effective than other adipose-derived therapies such as MSCs in reducing pain and improving joint function [193]. Studies comparing CEFFE and ADSC-EVs with other adipose tissue derivatives are still limited. However, available studies suggest that CEFFE may be superior to hyaluronic acid in reducing joint inflammation and improving chondrocyte metabolism [194]. Although high-quality evidence for non-cellular therapies is still lacking, future clinical studies are expected to provide further validation.
With the development of technology, new methods like 3D printing and bioscaffolds are improving adipose-derived therapies for OA. Nonaka et al. used 3D printing to assist ADSC chondrogenesis, and the resulting cartilage showed properties similar to those of normal cartilage [195]. Gelatin microcarriers were also used to culture and deliver ADSCs, which increased EV secretion and reduced the friction coefficient at the cartilage surface [196]. In another study, ADSCs were combined with bioporous scaffolds to release transforming growth factors (e.g., TGF-β1), thereby promoting cartilage regeneration [197]. Meanwhile, a hybrid scaffold (Gel-DCM) formed by combining photoreactive gelatin hyaluronic acid hydrogel (Gel) with directed porous decellularised cartilage matrix (DCM) provided a 3D microenvironment for ADSCs, which further promoted their cartilage differentiation [198]. Three-dimensional β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) bioceramic scaffolds combined with ADSCs have also demonstrated good mechanical support and form a thicker cartilage layer [199]. The combination of emerging technologies with adipose tissue-derived therapies demonstrates great potential to promote cartilage repair and improve osteoarthritis outcomes.
Non-cellular products, such as EVs and cell-free extracts, are increasingly gaining prominence in adipose-derived therapies. These strategies are able to avoid the potential risk of cancer development or ectopic osteogenesis in live cell therapy, while demonstrating multiple therapeutic efficacies in repairing cartilage, modulating joint inflammation, and promoting angiogenesis. Future research should prioritise the establishment of uniform extraction and quality control standards to ensure the consistency and reproducibility of the active molecule content and biological effects.

11. Conclusions

Fat derivatives show strong potential in the treatment of OA. Different forms of fat sources can help reduce pain in patients and improve joint function through multiple pathways, including modulating the inflammatory microenvironment and promoting chondrocyte repair and angiogenesis. Compared with traditional drugs or surgery, fat derivatives are highly regarded for their advantages of easy access, simple handling, and relatively low ethical risks. However, there is a lack of uniform preparation process and quality control standards, and safety issues such as ectopic osteogenesis and potential tumour risk have not been fully clarified. With the deepening of multidisciplinary research and the continuous optimisation of key technologies, fat derivatives are expected to provide a more precise, efficient, and personalised regenerative medicine option for OA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z.; methodology, H.Z.; software, O.F.; validation, H.Z., O.F. and L.P.; formal analysis, H.Z.; investigation, H.Z.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, H.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, O.F.; writing—review and editing, L.P.; visualization, L.P.; supervision, L.P.; project administration, L.P.; funding acquisition, H.Z., O.F. and L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Courties, A.; Kouki, I.; Soliman, N.; Mathieu, S.; Sellam, J. Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: Epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2024, 32, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Y.; Chen, B.; Liu, X.; Zeng, H.; Chen, B.; Wang, Z.; Yang, Q.; Peng, J.; Hao, L. Temporal trends in the burden of musculoskeletal diseases in China from 1990 to 2021 and predictions for 2021 to 2030. Bone 2024, 191, 117332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kolasinski, S.L.; Neogi, T.; Hochberg, M.C.; Oatis, C.; Guyatt, G.; Block, J.; Callahan, L.; Copenhaver, C.; Dodge, C.; Felson, D.; et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bannuru, R.R.; Osani, M.C.; Vaysbrot, E.E.; Arden, N.K.; Bennell, K.; Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.A.; Kraus, V.B.; Lohmander, L.S.; Abbott, J.H.; Bhandari, M.; et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019, 27, 1578–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ferkel, E.; Manjoo, A.; Martins, D.; Bhandari, M.; Sethi, P.; Nicholls, M. Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid Treatments for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Product Properties. CARTILAGE 2023, 14, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jüni, P.; Hari, R.; Rutjes, A.W.; Fischer, R.; Silletta, M.G.; Reichenbach, S.; da Costa, B.R. Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 2015, CD005328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Orfanos, G.; McCarthy, H.S.; Williams, M.; Dugard, N.; Gallacher, P.D.; Glover, A.W.; Roberts, S.; Wright, K.T.; Kuiper, J.H. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing “Early” Versus “Late” Periosteal Patch Attachment to Knee Chondral Defects in Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation. CARTILAGE 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beswick, A.D.; Wylde, V.; Gooberman-Hill, R.; Blom, A.; Dieppe, P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open 2012, 2, e000435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, H.; Wei, J.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Shen, Q. Assessing causality between osteoarthritis and gastrointestinal disorders: A Mendelian randomization study. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Burn, E.; Murray, D.; Hawker, G.; Pinedo-Villanueva, R.; Prieto-Alhambra, D. Lifetime risk of knee and hip replacement following a GP diagnosis of osteoarthritis: A real-world cohort study. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019, 27, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Matas, J.; Orrego, M.; Amenabar, D.; Infante, C.; Tapia-Limonchi, R.; Cadiz, M.I.; Alcayaga-Miranda, F.; González, P.L.; Muse, E.; Khoury, M.; et al. Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) for Knee Osteoarthritis: Repeated MSC Dosing Is Superior to a Single MSC Dose and to Hyaluronic Acid in a Controlled Randomized Phase I/II Trial. STEM CELLS Transl. Med. 2019, 8, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rosenfeld, C.S. Placenta Extracellular Vesicles: Messengers Connecting Maternal and Fetal Systems. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Onorato, F.; Rucci, M.; Alessio-Mazzola, M.; Bistolfi, A.; Castagnoli, C.; Formica, M.; Ferracini, R. Autologous microfragmented adipose tissue treatment of knee osteoarthritis demonstrates effectiveness in 68% of patients at 4-year follow-up. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2024, 144, 3925–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jeyaraman, M.; Jeyaraman, N.; Jayakumar, T.; Ramasubramanian, S.; Ranjan, R.; Jha, S.K.; Gupta, A. Efficacy of stromal vascular fraction for knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, single-centre, non-randomized study with 2 years follow-up. World, J. Orthop. 2024, 15, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yokota, N.; Hattori, M.; Ohtsuru, T.; Otsuji, M.; Lyman, S.; Shimomura, K.; Nakamura, N. Comparative Clinical Outcomes After Intra-articular Injection With Adipose-Derived Cultured Stem Cells or Noncultured Stromal Vascular Fraction for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Am. J. Sports Med. 2019, 47, 2577–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ragni, E.; Perucca Orfei, C.; De Luca, P.; Colombini, A.; Viganò, M.; de Girolamo, L. Secreted Factors and EV-miRNAs Orches-trate the Healing Capacity of Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jia, Z.; Kang, B.; Cai, Y.; Chen, C.; Yu, Z.; Li, W.; Zhang, W. Cell-free fat extract attenuates osteoarthritis via chondrocytes regeneration and macrophages immunomodulation. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bianchi, F.; Maioli, M.; Leonardi, E.; Olivi, E.; Pasquinelli, G.; Valente, S.; Mendez, A.J.; Ricordi, C.; Raffaini, M.; Tremolada, C.; et al. A New Nonenzymatic Method and Device to Obtain a Fat Tissue Derivative Highly Enriched in Pericyte-Like Elements by Mild Mechanical Forces from Human Lipoaspirates. Cell Transplant. 2013, 22, 2063–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prantl, L.; Eigenberger, A.; Reinhard, R.; Siegmund, A.; Heumann, K.; Felthaus, O. Cell-Enriched Lipotransfer (CELT) Improves Tissue Regeneration and Rejuvenation without Substantial Manipulation of the Adipose Tissue Graft. Cells 2022, 11, 3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carvalho, P.P.; Gimble, J.M.; Dias, I.R.; Gomes, M.E.; Reis, R.L. Xenofree Enzymatic Products for the Isolation of Human Adipose-Derived Stromal/Stem Cells. Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods 2013, 19, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oberbauer, E.; Steffenhagen, C.; Wurzer, C.; Gabriel, C.; Redl, H.; Wolbank, S. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic isolation systems for adipose tissue-derived cells: Current state of the art. Cell Regen. 2015, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shah, F.S.; Wu, X.; Dietrich, M.; Rood, J.; Gimble, J.M. A non-enzymatic method for isolating human adipose tissue-derived stromal stem cells. Cytotherapy 2013, 15, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bosetti, M.; Borrone, A.; Follenzi, A.; Messaggio, F.; Tremolada, C.; Cannas, M. Human Lipoaspirate as Autologous Injectable Active Scaffold for One-Step Repair of Cartilage Defects. Cell Transplant. 2016, 25, 1043–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xu, T.; Yu, X.; Yang, Q.; Liu, X.; Fang, J.; Dai, X. Autologous Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue as Stem Cell-Based Natural Scaffold for Cartilage Defect Repair. Cell Transplant. 2019, 28, 1709–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shi, Z.; He, J.; He, J.; Xu, Y. Micro-fragmented adipose tissue regulated the biological functions of osteoarthritis synoviocytes by upregulating MiR-92a-3p expression. Tissue Cell. 2022, 74, 101716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Borić, I.; Hudetz, D.; Rod, E.; Jeleč, Ž.; Vrdoljak, T.; Skelin, A.; Polašek, O.; Plečko, M.; Trbojević-Akmačić, I.; Lauc, G.; et al. A 24-Month Follow-Up Study of the Effect of Intra-Articular Injection of Autologous Microfragmented Fat Tissue on Proteoglycan Synthesis in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Genes 2019, 10, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heidari, N.; Noorani, A.; Slevin, M.; Zerbi, A.; Wilson, A. Patient-Centered Outcomes of Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Treatments of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational, Intention-to-Treat Study at Twelve Months. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 8881405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Van Genechten, W.; Vuylsteke, K.; Martinez, P.R.; Swinnen, L.; Sas, K.; Verdonk, P. Autologous Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue (MFAT) to Treat Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Early Outcomes of a Consecutive Case Series. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gobbi, A.; Dallo, I.; Rogers, C.; Striano, R.D.; Mautner, K.; Bowers, R.; Rozak, M.; Bilbool, N.; Murrell, W.D. Two-year clinical outcomes of autologous microfragmented adipose tissue in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis: A multi-centric, international study. Int. Orthop. 2021, 45, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Russo, A.; Cortina, G.; Condello, V.; Collarile, M.; Orlandi, R.; Gianoli, R.; Giuliani, E.; Madonna, V. Autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue injection provides significant and prolonged clinical improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A case-series study. J. Exp. Orthop. 2023, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Richter, D.L.; Harrison, J.L.; Faber, L.; Schrader, S.; Zhu, Y.; Pierce, C.; Watson, L.; Shetty, A.K.; Schenck, R.C. Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Injection Reduced Pain Compared With a Saline Control Among Patients With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee During 1-Year Follow-Up: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 2024, 41, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Natali, S.; Screpis, D.; Farinelli, L.; Iacono, V.; Vacca, V.; Gigante, A.; Zorzi, C. The use of intra-articular injection of autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue as pain treatment for ankle osteoarthritis: A prospective not randomized clinical study. Int. Orthop. 2021, 45, 2239–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Natali, S.; Screpis, D.; Romeo, M.; Magnanelli, S.; Rovere, G.; Andrea, A.; Camarda, L.; Zorzi, C. Is intra-articular injection of autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue effective in hip osteoarthritis? A three year follow-up. Int. Orthop. 2022, 47, 1487–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Heidari, N.; Slevin, M.; Zeinolabediny, Y.; Meloni, D.; Olgiati, S.; Wilson, A.; Noorani, A.; Azamfirei, L. Comparison of the Effect of MFAT and MFAT + PRP on Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis: An Observational, Intention-to-Treat Study at One Year. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Striano, R.D.; Malanga, G.A.; Bilbool, N.; Azatullah, K. Refractory shoulder pain with osteoarthritis, and rotator cuff tear, treated with micro-fragmented adipose tissue. Orthop. Spine Sports Med. 2018, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vinet-Jones, H.; K, F.D. Clinical use of autologous micro-fragmented fat progressively restores pain and function in shoulder osteoarthritis. Regen Med. 2020, 15, 2153–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baria, M.; George, R.; Barker, T.; Flanigan, D.; Kaeding, C.; Magnussen, R.A. Relationship of Body Mass Index on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Microfragmented Adipose Tissue for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2024, 103, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Miller, D.; Grant, A.; Durgam, S.; El-Hayek, K.; Flanigan, D.C.; Malanga, G.; Vasileff, W.K.; Baria, M.R. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells, Obesity, and In-flammation: A Systematic Review and Implications for Osteoarthritis Treatment. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 101, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hudetz, D.; Borić, I.; Rod, E.; Jeleč, Ž.; Radić, A.; Vrdoljak, T.; Skelin, A.; Lauc, G.; Trbojević-Akmačić, I.; Plečko, M.; et al. The Effect of Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Microfragmented Fat Tissue on Proteoglycan Synthesis in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Genes 2017, 8, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mautner, K.; Bowers, R.; Easley, K.; Fausel, Z.; Robinson, R. Functional Outcomes Following Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis. STEM CELLS Transl. Med. 2019, 8, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Heidari, N.; Borg, T.-M.; Olgiati, S.; Slevin, M.; Danovi, A.; Fish, B.; Wilson, A.; Noorani, A. Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Injection (MFAT) May Be a Solution to the Rationing of Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective, Gender-Bias Mitigated, Reproducible Analysis at Two Years. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Screpis, D.; Natali, S.; Farinelli, L.; Piovan, G.; Iacono, V.; de Girolamo, L.; Viganò, M.; Zorzi, C. Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Real-World Data at Two Years Follow-Up. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zaffagnini, S.; Andriolo, L.; Boffa, A.; Poggi, A.; Cenacchi, A.; Busacca, M.; Kon, E.; Filardo, G.; Di Martino, A. Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial at 2-Year Follow-up. Am. J. Sports Med. 2022, 50, 2881–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, F.A.; Grant, R.; Whitehead, J.P.; Yewlett, A.; Lee, P.Y.F. An Observational Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Microfragmented Adipose Tissue in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Regen. Med. 2022, 18, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yu, Y.; Lu, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, M.; Sun, H.; Li, L.; Han, K.; Liu, P. Intra-Articular Injection of Autologous Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Interventional Study. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Baria, M.; Barker, T.; Durgam, S.; Pedroza, A.; Flanigan, D.; Jia, L.; Kaeding, C.; Magnussen, R. Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Is Equivalent to Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis at 12 Months Posttreatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2024, 12, 23259671241233916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, W.-T.; Ke, C.-Y.; Yeh, K.-T.; Huang, S.-G.; Lin, Z.-Y.; Wu, W.-T.; Lee, R.-P. Stromal-vascular fraction and adipose-derived stem cell therapies improve cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis-induced rats. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Anjiki, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Kuroda, Y.; Fujita, M.; Hayashi, S.; Nakano, N.; Tsubosaka, M.; Kamenaga, T.; Takashima, Y.; Kikuchi, K.; et al. Heterogeneous Cells as well as Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells in Stromal Vascular Fraction Contribute to Enhance Anabolic and Inhibit Catabolic Factors in Osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2023, 19, 2407–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fujita, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Hayashi, S.; Hashimoto, S.; Nakano, N.; Maeda, T.; Kuroda, Y.; Takashima, Y.; Kikuchi, K.; Anjiki, K.; et al. Paracrine effect of the stromal vascular frac-tion containing M2 macrophages on human chondrocytes through the Smad2/3 signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2022, 237, 3627–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Onoi, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Anjiki, K.; Hayashi, S.; Nakano, N.; Kuroda, Y.; Tsubosaka, M.; Kamenaga, T.; Ikuta, K.; Tachibana, S.; et al. Human uncultured adipose-derived stromal vas-cular fraction shows therapeutic potential against osteoarthritis in immunodeficient rats via direct effects of transplanted M2 macrophages. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024, 15, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hong, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, C.; Bi, M.; Chen, X.; Bi, Q. Intra-articular injection of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fractions for knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind randomized self-controlled trial. Int. Orthop. 2018, 43, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tsubosaka, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Sobajima, S.; Matsushita, T.; Iwaguro, H.; Kuroda, R. The influence of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells on the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shanmugasundaram, S.; Vaish, A.; Chavada, V.; Murrell, W.D.; Vaishya, R. Assessment of safety and efficacy of intra-articular injection of stromal vascular fraction for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis—A systematic review. Int. Orthop. 2021, 45, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tsubosaka, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Sobajima, S.; Matsushita, T.; Iwaguro, H.; Kuroda, R. Comparison of Clinical and Imaging Outcomes of Different Doses of Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Cell Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis. Cell Transplant. 2021, 30, 9636897211067454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Çimen, O.; Irgıt, K.S.; Bekmezci, T.; Büyüktopçu, Ö.; Şahbat, Y.; Korucu, A. Midterm results of intra-articular stromal vascular fraction injection for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2023, 31, 5012–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rogers, C.J.; Harman, R.; Sheinkop, M.B.; Hanson, P.; Ambach, M.A.; David, T.; Desai, R.; Sampson, S.; Aufierro, D.; Bowen, J.; et al. Clinical Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of a Central Current Good Manufacturing Practices Laboratory Produced Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Cell Therapy Product for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Stem Cells Dev. 2024, 33, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Labarre, K.W.; Zimmermann, G. Infiltration of the Hoffa’s fat pad with stromal vascular fraction in patients with osteoar-thritis of the knee -Results after one year of follow-up. Bone Rep. 2022, 16, 101168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Labarre, K.W.; Zimmermann, G. Long-term effects of infrapatellar fat pad SVF infiltration in knee osteoarthritis management: A prospective cohort study. Bone Rep. 2025, 24, 101827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Han, J.H.; Jung, M.; Chung, K.; Moon, H.-S.; Jung, S.-H.; Byun, J.; Kim, S.-H. Intra-articular Stromal Vascular Fraction and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections Show Variable Efficacy and Higher Potential Complications Compared to Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Onoi, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Sobajima, S.; Tsubosaka, M.; Hayashi, S.; Matsushita, T.; Iwaguro, H.; Kuroda, R. Clinical use of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cell injections for hip osteoarthritis. Regen. Ther. 2023, 24, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yokota, N.; Yamakawa, M.; Shirata, T.; Kimura, T.; Kaneshima, H. Clinical results following intra-articular injection of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Regen. Ther. 2017, 6, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roato, I.; Belisario, D.C.; Compagno, M.; Lena, A.; Bistolfi, A.; Maccari, L.; Mussano, F.; Genova, T.; Godio, L.; Perale, G.; et al. Concentrated adipose tissue infusion for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: Clinical and histological observations. Int. Orthop. 2018, 43, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hudetz, D.; Borić, I.; Rod, E.; Jeleč, Ž.; Kunovac, B.; Polašek, O.; Vrdoljak, T.; Plečko, M.; Skelin, A.; Polančec, D.; et al. Early results of intra-articular micro-fragmented lipoaspirate treatment in patients with late stages knee osteoarthritis: A prospective study. Croat. Med, J. 2019, 60, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Garza, J.R.; Campbell, R.E.; Tjoumakaris, F.P.; Freedman, K.B.; Miller, L.S.; Santa Maria, D.; Tucker, B.S. Clinical Efficacy of Intra-articular Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Am. J. Sports Med. 2020, 48, 588–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Simunec, D.; Salari, H.; Meyer, J. Treatment of Grade 3 and 4 Osteoarthritis with Intraoperatively Separated Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction: A Comparative Case Series. Cells 2020, 9, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Y.; Bi, Q.; Luo, J.; Tong, Y.; Yu, T.; Zhang, Q. The Effect of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fractions on Cartilage Regeneration Was Quantitatively Evaluated Based on the 3D-FS-SPGR Sequence: A Clinical Trial Study. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 2777568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yokota, N.; Lyman, S.; Hanai, H.; Shimomura, K.; Ando, W.; Nakamura, N. Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell vs Stromal Vascular Fraction Injection for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: 2-Year Results of Parallel Single-Arm Trials. Am. J. Sports Med. 2022, 50, 2659–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shevela, E.Y.; Glebova, T.R.; Kotova, M.A.; Nitsa, N.A.; Kozhevnikov, Y.A.; Meledina, I.V.; Ostanin, A.A.; Chernykh, E.R. Comparative Efficacy of the Stromal-Vascular Fraction Cells of Lipoaspirate and Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Gonarthrosis: Results of an Interim Analysis. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2022, 174, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tantuway, V.; Thomas, W.; Parikh, M.B.; Sharma, R.; Jeyaraman, N.; Jeyaraman, M. Clinical Outcome of Minimally Manipulat-ed, Mechanically Isolated Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction (Sahaj Therapy®) in Knee Osteoarthritis-Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J. Orthop. 2023, 57, 1646–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fujita, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Sobajima, S.; Tsubosaka, M.; Matsushita, T.; Iwaguro, H.; Kuroda, R. Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Single and Double Intra-articular Injection of Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Knee Osteoarthritis. Cell Transplant. 2023, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sugihara, H.; Yonemitsu, N.; Miyabara, S.; Yun, K. Primary cultures of unilocular fat cells: Characteristics of growth in vitro and changes in differentiation properties. Differentiation 1986, 31, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Matsumoto, T.; Kano, K.; Kondo, D.; Fukuda, N.; Iribe, Y.; Tanaka, N.; Matsubara, Y.; Sakuma, T.; Satomi, A.; Otaki, M.; et al. Mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells exhibit multilineage potential. J. Cell. Physiol. 2008, 215, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Jumabay, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Yokoyama, S.-I.; Kano, K.; Kusumi, Y.; Masuko, T.; Mitsumata, M.; Saito, S.; Hirayama, A.; Mugishima, H.; et al. Dedifferentiated fat cells convert to cardiomyocyte phenotype and repair infarcted cardiac tissue in rats. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009, 47, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xue, M.; Liao, Y.; Jiang, W. Insights into the molecular changes of adipocyte dedifferentiation and its future research oppor-tunities. J. Lipid Res. 2024, 65, 100644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Tian, L.; Choi, M.H.; Wang, L.; Kim, J.Y.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, S.H.; Zhang, L. Hypertonicity induces mitochondrial extracellular vesicles (MEVs) that activate TNF-α and β-catenin signaling to promote adipocyte dedifferentiation. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2023, 14, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Côté, J.A.; Lessard, J.; Pelletier, M.; Marceau, S.; Lescelleur, O.; Fradette, J.; Tchernof, A. Role of the TGF-β pathway in dedifferentiation of human mature adipocytes. FEBS Open Bio 2017, 7, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shimizu, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Kikuta, S.; Ohtaki, M.; Kano, K.; Taniguchi, H.; Saito, S.; Nagaoka, M.; Tokuhashi, Y. Transplantation of dedifferentiated fat cell-derived micromass pellets contributed to cartilage repair in the rat osteochondral defect model. J. Orthop. Sci. 2018, 23, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Poloni, A.; Maurizi, G.; Mattiucci, D.; Busilacchi, E.; Mancini, S.; Discepoli, G.; Amici, A.; Falconi, M.; Cinti, S.; Leoni, P. Biosafety evidence for human dedifferentiat-ed adipocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 230, 1525–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shen, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhai, Z.; Wu, Y.; Qu, F.; Xu, C. Conditioned Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Dedifferentiated Fat Cells Promote Bone Regeneration by Altering MicroRNAs. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Oki, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Endo, T.; Kano, K. Mature Adipocyte-Derived Dedifferentiated Fat Cells Can Trans-Differentiate into Osteoblasts In Vitro and In Vivo only by All-Trans Retinoic Acid. Cell Struct. Funct. 2008, 33, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jumabay, M.; Abdmaulen, R.; Urs, S.; Heydarkhan-Hagvall, S.; Chazenbalk, G.D.; Jordan, M.C.; Roos, K.P.; Yao, Y.; Boström, K.I. Endothelial differentiation in multipotent cells derived from mouse and human white mature adipocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2012, 53, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Endo, N.; Matsumoto, T.; Kazama, T.; Kano, K.; Shimizu, M.; Ryu, K.; Tokuhashi, Y.; Nakanishi, K. Therapeutic potential of dedifferentiated fat cells in a rat model of osteoarthritis of the knee. Regen. Ther. 2024, 26, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Sun, Y.-C.; Shen, P.-H.; Wang, C.-C.; Liu, H.-Y.; Lu, C.-H.; Su, S.-C.; Liu, J.-S.; Li, P.-F.; Huang, C.-L.; Ho, L.-J.; et al. DFATs derived from infrapatellar fat pad hold advantage on chondrogenesis and adipogenesis to evade age mediated influence. J. Orthop. Transl. 2023, 42, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Nur, R.; Fukuda, N.; Matsumoto, T.; Medet, J.; Kano, K.; Yamamoto, C.; Maruyama, T.; Endo, M.; Matsumoto, K. Implantation of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells Ameliorates Habu Snake Venom-Induced Chronic Renal Dysfunction in Tenascin-C-Deficient Mice. Nephron Exp. Nephrol. 2008, 110, e91–e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ohta, Y.; Takenaga, M.; Tokura, Y.; Hamaguchi, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Kano, K.; Mugishima, H.; Okano, H.; Igarashi, R. Mature Adipocyte-Derived Cells, Dedifferentiated Fat Cells (DFAT), Promoted Functional Recovery from Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Motor Dysfunction in Rats. Cell Transplant. 2008, 17, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sugawara, A.; Sato, S. Application of dedifferentiated fat cells for periodontal tissue regeneration. Hum. Cell 2013, 27, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yamada, H.; Ito, D.; Oki, Y.; Kitagawa, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Watari, T.; Kano, K. Transplantation of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells promotes locomotor functional recovery by remyelination and glial scar reduction after spinal cord injury in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 454, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Soejima, K.; Kashimura, T.; Asami, T.; Kazama, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Nakazawa, H. Effects of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells on generation and vascularisation of dermis-like tissue after artificial dermis grafting. J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg. 2014, 49, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.-A.; Guo, S.-L.; Wang, S.; Wu, D.; Wang, Y.; Luo, D.; Zhou, B.-R. Antiphotoaging Effect of Conditioned Medium of Dedifferentiated Adipocytes on Skin In Vivo and In Vitro: A Mechanistic Study. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 1096–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Maruyama, T.; Fukuda, N.; Matsumoto, T.; Kano, K.; Endo, M.; Kazama, M.; Kazama, T.; Ikeda, J.; Matsuda, H.; Ueno, T.; et al. Systematic implantation of dedifferentiated fat cells ameliorated monoclonal antibody 1-22-3-induced glomerulonephritis by immunosuppression with increases in TNF-stimulated gene 6. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ikado, Y.; Obinata, D.; Matsumoto, T.; Murata, Y.; Kano, K.; Fukuda, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Takahashi, S. Transplantation of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in a rat model. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2016, 48, 1951–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Mikrogeorgiou, A.; Sato, Y.; Kondo, T.; Hattori, T.; Sugiyama, Y.; Ito, M.; Saito, A.; Nakanishi, K.; Tsuji, M.; Kazama, T.; et al. Dedifferentiated Fat Cells as a Novel Source for Cell Therapy to Target Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. Dev. Neurosci. 2017, 39, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kakudo, T.; Kishimoto, N.; Matsuyama, T.; Momota, Y. Functional recovery by application of human dedifferentiated fat cells on cerebral infarction mice model. Cytotechnology 2018, 70, 949–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fujimaki, H.; Matsumine, H.; Osaki, H.; Ueta, Y.; Kamei, W.; Shimizu, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Fujii, K.; Kazama, T.; Matsumoto, T.; et al. Dedifferentiated fat cells in polyglycolic acid-collagen nerve conduits promote rat facial nerve regeneration. Regen. Ther. 2019, 11, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tateno, A.; Asano, M.; Akita, D.; Toriumi, T.; Tsurumachi-Iwasaki, N.; Kazama, T.; Arai, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Kano, K.; Honda, M. Transplantation of dedifferentiated fat cells combined with a biodegradable type I collagen-recombinant peptide scaffold for critical-size bone defects in rats. J. Oral Sci. 2019, 61, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ishioka, S.; Hosokawa, T.; Ikeda, T.; Konuma, N.; Kaneda, H.; Ohashi, K.; Furuya, T.; Masuko, T.; Taniguchi, H.; Kano, K.; et al. Therapeutic potential of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells for inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2020, 36, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fujisaki, S.; Kajiya, H.; Yanagi, T.; Maeshiba, M.; Kakura, K.; Kido, H.; Ohno, J. Enhancement of jaw bone regeneration via ERK1/2 activation using dedifferentiated fat cells. Cytotherapy 2021, 23, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Huang, G.; Xia, B.; Dai, Z.; Yang, R.; Chen, R.; Yang, H. Comparative study of dedifferentiated fat cell and adipose-derived stromal cell sheets for periodontal tissue regeneration: In vivo and in vitro evidence. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2022, 49, 1289–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Utsunomiya, K.; Maruyama, T.; Shimizu, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Endo, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Kano, K.; Abe, M.; Fukuda, N. Implantation of dedifferentiated fat cells ameliorated antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody glomerulonephritis by immunosuppression and increases in tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Akita, D.; Kazama, T.; Tsukimura, N.; Taniguchi, Y.; Takahashi, R.; Arai, Y.; Tsurumachi-Iwasaki, N.; Yasuda, H.; Okubo, T.; Kano, K.; et al. Transplantation of Mature Adipocyte-Derived Dedifferentiated Fat Cells Facilitates Periodontal Tissue Regeneration of Class II Furcation Defects in Miniature Pigs. Materials 2022, 15, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Murata, Y.; Obinata, D.; Matsumoto, T.; Ikado, Y.; Kano, K.; Fukuda, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Takahashi, S. Urethral injection of dedifferentiated fat cells ameliorates sphincter damage and voiding dysfunction in a rat model of persistence stress urinary incontinence. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2022, 54, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Mimatsu, H.; Onoda, A.; Kazama, T.; Nishijima, K.; Shimoyama, Y.; Go, S.; Ueda, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Hayakawa, M.; et al. Dedifferentiated fat cells administration amelio-rates abnormal expressions of fatty acids metabolism-related protein expressions and intestinal tissue damage in experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kamidaki, Y.; Hosokawa, T.; Abe, N.; Fujita, E.; Yamaoka, B.; Ono, K.; Goto, S.; Kazama, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Uehara, S. Muscle regeneration therapy using dedifferentiated fat cell (DFAT) for anal sphincter dysfunction. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2024, 40, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Keerthi, N.; Chimutengwende-Gordon, M.; Sanghani, A.; Khan, W. The Potential of Stem Cell Therapy for Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013, 8, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kong, L.; Zheng, L.-Z.; Qin, L.; Ho, K.K. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in osteoarthritis treatment. J. Orthop. Transl. 2017, 9, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kim, S.-H.; Lechman, E.R.; Bianco, N.; Menon, R.; Keravala, A.; Nash, J.; Mi, Z.; Watkins, S.C.; Gambotto, A.; Robbins, P.D. Exosomes Derived from IL-10-Treated Dendritic Cells Can Suppress Inflammation and Collagen-Induced Arthritis. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 6440–6448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Medina, J.; Pérez-Baos, S.; Naredo, E.; López-Reyes, A.; Herrero-Beaumont, G.; Largo, R. AB0075 Intraarterial injection of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (HAD-MSCS) attenuates inflammation in acute arthritis model. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Baharlou, R.; Ahmadi-Vasmehjani, A.; Faraji, F.; Atashzar, M.R.; Khoubyari, M.; Ahi, S.; Erfanian, S.; Navabi, S.-S. Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatoid arthritis: Regulatory effects on peripheral blood mononuclear cells activation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 47, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Caplan, A.I. New MSC: MSCs as pericytes are Sentinels and gatekeepers. J. Orthop. Res. 2017, 35, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fraser, J.K.; Wulur, I.; Alfonso, Z.; Hedrick, M.H. Fat tissue: An underappreciated source of stem cells for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mitchell, M.I.; Khalil, M.; Ben-Dov, I.Z.; Alverez-Perez, J.; Illsley, N.P.; Zamudio, S.; Al-Khan, A.; Loudig, O. Customizing EV-CATCHER to Purify Placental Extracellular Vesicles from Maternal Plasma to Detect Placental Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ao, Y.; Duan, J.; Xiong, N.; Qian, N.; Zhang, R.; Yang, L.; Yu, S.; Wang, F. Repeated intra-articular injections of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for knee osteoarthritis: A phase I., single-arm study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2023, 24, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Bernardo, M.E.; Locatelli, F.; Fibbe, W.E. Mesenchymal stromal cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1176, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Strioga, M.; Viswanathan, S.; Darinskas, A.; Slaby, O.; Michalek, J. Same or Not the Same? Comparison of Adipose Tissue-Derived Versus Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem and Stromal Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2012, 21, 2724–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Muthu, S.; Patil, S.C.; Jeyaraman, N.; Jeyaraman, M.; Gangadaran, P.; Rajendran, R.L.; Oh, E.J.; Khanna, M.; Chung, H.Y.; Ahn, B.-C. Comparative effectiveness of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis. World J. Orthop. 2023, 14, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kariminekoo, S.; Movassaghpour, A.; Rahimzadeh, A.; Talebi, M.; Shamsasenjan, K.; Akbarzadeh, A. Implications of mesen-chymal stem cells in regenerative medicine. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Vadhan, A.; Gupta, T.; Hsu, W.-L. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes as a Treatment Option for Osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Schelbergen, R.F.; van Dalen, S.; ter Huurne, M.; Roth, J.; Vogl, T.; Noël, D.; Jorgensen, C.; van den Berg, Q.B.; van de Loo, F.A. Treatment efficacy of adipose-derived stem cells in experimental osteoarthritis is driven by high synovial activation and reflected by S100A8/A9 serum levels. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2014, 22, 1158–1166. [Google Scholar]
  119. Kuroda, K.; Kabata, T.; Hayashi, K.; Maeda, T.; Kajino, Y.; Iwai, S.; Fujita, K.; Hasegawa, K.; Inoue, D.; Sugimoto, N.; et al. The paracrine effect of adipose-derived stem cells inhibits osteoarthritis progression. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2015, 16, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Jin, R.; Shen, M.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Lin, X. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Suppress Inflammation Induced by IL-1β through Down-Regulation of P2X7R Mediated by miR-373 in Chondrocytes of Osteoarthritis. Mol. Cells 2017, 40, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Xu, L.; Zhang, F.; Cheng, G.; Yuan, X.; Wu, Y.; Wu, H.; Wang, Q.; Chen, J.; Kuai, J.; Chang, Y.; et al. Attenuation of experimental osteoarthritis with human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy: Inhibition of the pyroptosis in chondrocytes. Inflamm. Res. 2022, 72, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Lee, H.-J.; Kim, D.-Y.; Noh, H.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Yoo, J.A.; Won, S.J.; Jeon, Y.S.; Baek, J.H.; Ryu, D.J. Elevated IL-6 Expression in Autologous Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Regulates RANKL Mediated Inflammation in Osteoarthritis. Cells 2024, 13, 2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Hosono, Y.; Kuwasawa, A.; Toyoda, E.; Nihei, K.; Sato, S.; Watanabe, M.; Sato, M. Multiple intra-articular injections with adipose-derived stem cells for knee osteoarthritis cause severe arthritis with anti-histone H2B antibody production. Regen. Ther. 2023, 24, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kim, J.-H.; Kim, K.-I.; Yoon, W.K.; Song, S.-J.; Jin, W. Intra-articular Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells After High Tibial Osteotomy in Osteoarthritic Knee: Two-Year Follow-up of Randomized Control Trial. STEM CELLS Transl. Med. 2022, 11, 572–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hatano, M.; Ishikura, H.; Terao, T.; Kasai, T.; Yamagami, R.; Higuchi, J.; Yoshida, S.; Arino, Y.; Murakami, R.; Sato, M.; et al. Intra-articular administration of autologous adipose-derived stem cells in hip osteoarthritis: Longitudinal treatment trajectories and prognostic factors. Regen. Ther. 2025, 29, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chen, C.F.; Hu, C.C.; Wu, C.T.; Wu, H.H.; Chang, C.S.; Hung, Y.P.; Tsai, C.-C.; Chang, Y. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with intra-articular injec-tion of allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) ELIXCYTE®: A phase I/II, randomized, active-control, single-blind, multiple-center clinical trial. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chen, Y.-H.; Hung, Y.-P.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.-T.; Tsai, T.-C.; Yang, J.-J.; Wu, C.-C. ELIXCYTE®, an Allogenic Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Product, Mitigates Osteoarthritis by Reducing Inflammation and Preventing Cartilage Degradation In Vitro. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 8395–8406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Trams, E.G.; Lauter, C.J.; Salem, N., Jr.; Heine, U. Exfoliation of membrane ecto-enzymes in the form of micro-vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1981, 645, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Welsh, J.A.; Goberdhan, D.C.I.; O’Driscoll, L.; Buzas, E.I.; Blenkiron, C.; Bussolati, B.; Cai, H.; Di Vizio, D.; Driedonks, T.A.P.; Erdbrügger, U.; et al. Minimal information for studies of ex-tracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Clua-Ferré, L.; Suau, R.; Vañó-Segarra, I.; Ginés, I.; Serena, C.; Manyé, J. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: A focus on inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. Transl. Med. 2024, 14, e70075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhou, B.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, W.; Chen, T.; Liu, Z. Therapeutic potential of adipose-derived stem cell extracellular vesicles: From inflammation regulation to tissue repair. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2024, 15, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Gatti, S.; Bruno, S.; Deregibus, M.C.; Sordi, A.; Cantaluppi, V.; Tetta, C.; Camussi, G. Microvesicles derived from human adult mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischaemia-reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011, 26, 1474–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zhang, S.; Chu, W.C.; Lai, R.C.; Lim, S.K.; Hui, J.H.P.; Toh, W.S. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 2135–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Murphy, D.E.; de Jong, O.G.; Brouwer, M.; Wood, M.J.; Lavieu, G.; Schiffelers, R.M.; Vader, P. Extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics: Natural versus engineered targeting and trafficking. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019, 51, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Record, M.; Carayon, K.; Poirot, M.; Silvente-Poirot, S. Exosomes as new vesicular lipid transporters involved in cell–cell communication and various pathophysiologies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2014, 1841, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Fernandes, J.C.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Pelletier, J.-P. The role of cytokines in osteoarthritis pathophysiology. Biorheology 2002, 39, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. López-Armada, M.; Caramés, B.; Lires-Deán, M.; Cillero-Pastor, B.; Ruiz-Romero, C.; Galdo, F.; Blanco, F. Cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β, differentially regulate apoptosis in osteoarthritis cultured human chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2006, 14, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Martel-Pelletier, J.; Pelletier, J.P.; Fahmi, H. Cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandins in articular tissues. In Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  139. Liu, Q.; Wu, J.; Wang, H.; Jia, Z.; Li, G. Human Infrapatellar Fat Pad Mesenchymal Stem Cell–derived Extracellular Vesicles Purified by Anion Exchange Chromatography Suppress Osteoarthritis Progression in a Mouse Model. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2024, 482, 1246–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ragni, E.; Colombini, A.; Viganò, M.; Libonati, F.; Orfei, C.P.; Zagra, L.; de Girolamo, L. Cartilage Protective and Immunomodulatory Features of Osteoarthritis Synovial Fluid-Treated Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Secreted Factors and Extracellular Vesicles-Embedded miRNAs. Cells 2021, 10, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Samal, J.R.; Rangasami, V.K.; Samanta, S.; Varghese, O.P.; Oommen, O.P. Discrepancies on the role of oxygen gradient and cul-ture condition on mesenchymal stem cell fate. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2002058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chang, L.-H.; Wu, S.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Chen, J.-W.; Huang, W.-C.; Wu, C.-W.; Lin, Y.-S.; Chen, Y.-J.; Chang, J.-K.; Ho, M.-L. Exosomes Derived from Hypoxia-Cultured Human Adipose Stem Cells Alleviate Articular Chondrocyte Inflammaging and Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ragni, E.; Orfei, C.P.; De Luca, P.; Mondadori, C.; Viganò, M.; Colombini, A.; de Girolamo, L. Inflammatory priming enhances mesenchymal stromal cell secretome potential as a clinical product for regenerative medicine approaches through secreted factors and EV-miRNAs: The example of joint disease. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Woo, C.H.; Kim, H.K.; Yang, S.; Park, J.H.; Jo, D.; Cho, Y.W.; Jung, G.Y.; Jung, Y.J.; Lee, K.S.; Yun, Y.E.; et al. Small extracellular vesicles from human adipose-derived stem cells attenuate cartilage degeneration. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2020, 9, 1735249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Li, Y.; Duan, J.; Lin, W.; Liu, J. Exosomal miR-93-5p regulated the progression of osteoarthritis by targeting ADAMTS9. Open Med. 2023, 18, 20230668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhao, C.; Chen, J.Y.; Peng, W.M.; Yuan, B.; Bi, Q.; Xu, Y.J. Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells promote chondrogenesis and suppress inflammation by upregulating miR-145 and miR-221. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 21, 1881–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tofiño-Vian, M.; Guillén, M.I.; del Caz, M.D.P.; Silvestre, A.; Alcaraz, M.J. Microvesicles from Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a New Protective Strategy in Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 47, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bina, V.; Brancato, A.M.; Caliogna, L.; Berni, M.; Gastaldi, G.; Mosconi, M.; Pasta, G.; Grassi, F.A.; Jannelli, E. Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Secretome as a New Possible Approach to Treat Cartilage Damage: An In Vitro Study. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Charlier, E.; Relic, B.; Deroyer, C.; Malaise, O.; Neuville, S.; Collée, J.; Malaise, M.G.; De Seny, D. Insights on Molecular Mechanisms of Chondrocytes Death in Osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Caramés, B.; Taniguchi, N.; Otsuki, S.; Blanco, F.; Lotz, M. 188 AUTOPHAGY IS A PROTECTIVE MECHANISM IN NORMAL CARTILAGE AND ITS AGING-RELATED LOSS IS LINKED WITH CELL DEATH AND OSTEOARTHRITIS. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2009, 17, S109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wu, J.; Kuang, L.; Chen, C.; Yang, J.; Zeng, W.-N.; Li, T.; Chen, H.; Huang, S.; Fu, Z.; Li, J.; et al. miR-100-5p-abundant exosomes derived from infrapatellar fat pad MSCs protect articular cartilage and ameliorate gait abnormalities via inhibition of mTOR in osteoarthritis. Biomaterials 2019, 206, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Guillén, M.I.; Tofiño-Vian, M.; Silvestre, A.; Castejón, M.A.; Alcaraz, M.J. Role of peroxiredoxin 6 in the chondroprotective effects of microvesicles from human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Orthop. Transl. 2021, 30, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Meng, C.; Na, Y.; Han, C.; Ren, Y.; Liu, M.; Ma, P.; Bai, R. Exosomal miR-429 derived from adipose-derived stem cells ameliorated chondral injury in osteoarthritis via autophagy by targeting FEZ2. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 120, 110315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Li, F.; Xu, Z.; Xie, Z.; Sun, X.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Pi, G. Adipose mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes alleviate osteoarthritis by transporting microRNA -376c-3p and targeting the WNT-beta-catenin signaling axis. Apoptosis 2022, 28, 362–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Zhao, S.; Xiu, G.; Wang, J.; Wen, Y.; Lu, J.; Wu, B.; Wang, G.; Yang, D.; Ling, B.; Du, D.; et al. Engineering exosomes derived from subcutaneous fat MSCs specially promote cartilage repair as miR-199a-3p delivery vehicles in Osteoarthritis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, C.; Li, W.; Pu, G.; Wu, J.; Qin, F. Exosomes derived from miR-338-3p-modified adipose stem cells inhibited inflammation injury of chondrocytes via targeting RUNX2 in osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2022, 17, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yin, Z.; Qin, C.; Pan, S.; Shi, C.; Wu, G.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Z.; Liang, B.; Gui, G. Injectable hyperbranched PEG crosslinked hyaluronan hydrogel micro-particles containing mir-99a-3p modified subcutaneous ADSCs-derived exosomes was beneficial for long-term treatment of osteo-arthritis. Mater Today Bio 2023, 23, 100813. [Google Scholar]
  158. Ragni, E.; Perucca Orfei, C.; De Luca, P.; Lugano, G.; Viganò, M.; Colombini, A.; Valli, F.; Zacchetti, D.; Bollati, V.; De Girolamo, L. Interaction with hyaluronan matrix and miRNA cargo as contributors for in vitro potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in a model of human osteoarthritic synoviocytes. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Li, Q.; Yu, H.; Zhao, F.; Cao, C.; Wu, T.; Fan, Y.; Ao, Y.; Hu, X. 3D Printing of Microenvironment-Specific Bioinspired and Exosome-Reinforced Hydrogel Scaffolds for Efficient Cartilage and Subchondral Bone Regeneration. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2303650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wu, J.; Wu, J.; Xiang, W.; Gong, Y.; Feng, D.; Fang, S.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, R.; et al. Engineering exosomes derived from TNF-α preconditioned IPFP-MSCs enhance both yield and therapeutic efficacy for osteoarthritis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Tofiño-Vian, M.; Guillén, M.I.; del Caz, M.D.P.; Castejón, M.A.; Alcaraz, M.J. Extracellular Vesicles from Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Downregulate Senescence Features in Osteoarthritic Osteoblasts. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 7197598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Cavallo, C.; Merli, G.; Borzì, R.M.; Zini, N.; D’adamo, S.; Guescini, M.; Grigolo, B.; Di Martino, A.; Santi, S.; Filardo, G. Small Extracellular Vesicles from adipose derived stromal cells significantly attenuate in vitro the NF-κB dependent inflammatory/catabolic environment of osteoarthritis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Cavallo, C.; Merli, G.; Zini, N.; D’adamo, S.; Cattini, L.; Guescini, M.; Grigolo, B.; Di Martino, A.; Santi, S.; Borzì, R.M.; et al. Small Extracellular Vesicles from Inflamed Adipose Derived Stromal Cells Enhance the NF-κB-Dependent Inflammatory/Catabolic Environment of Osteoarthritis. Stem Cells Int. 2022, 2022, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Wang, Y.; Fan, A.; Lu, L.; Pan, Z.; Ma, M.; Luo, S.; Liu, Z.; Yang, L.; Cai, J.; Yin, F. Exosome modification to better alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress induced chondrocyte apoptosis and osteoarthritis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2022, 206, 115343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Meng, S.; Tang, C.; Deng, M.; Yuan, J.; Fan, Y.; Gao, S.; Feng, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, C. Tropoelastin-Pretreated Exosomes from Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Improve the Synthesis of Cartilage Matrix and Alleviate Osteoarthritis. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Yu, Z.; Cai, Y.; Deng, M.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Zheng, H.; Xu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, W. Fat extract promotes angiogenesis in a murine model of limb ischemia: A novel cell-free therapeutic strategy. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cai, Y.; Yu, Z.; Yu, Q.; Zheng, H.; Xu, Y.; Deng, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Li, W. Fat Extract Improves Random Pattern Skin Flap Survival in a Rat Model. Aesthetic Surg. J. 2019, 39, NP504–NP514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Deng, M.; Wang, X.; Yu, Z.; Cai, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhou, G.; Wang, X.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, W.J. Cell-free fat extract promotes tissue regeneration in a tissue expansion model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, M.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, X.; Duan, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Q.; Xu, B.; Zhang, A. Cell-free fat extract improves ovarian function and fertility in mice with premature ovarian insufficiency. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Cai, Y.; Jia, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, B.; Chen, C.; Liu, W.; Zhang, W. Cell-free fat extract restores hair loss: A novel therapeutic strategy for androgenetic alopecia. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2023, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Jia, Z.; Kang, B.; Dong, Y.; Fan, M.; Li, W.; Zhang, W. Annexin A5 Derived from Cell-free Fat Extract Attenuates Osteoarthritis via Macrophage Regulation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2024, 20, 2994–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zimmerlin, L.; Donnenberg, V.S.; Pfeifer, M.E.; Meyer, E.M.; Péault, B.; Rubin, J.P.; Donnenberg, A.D. Stromal vascular progenitors in adult hu-man adipose tissue. Cytom. Part A J. Int. Soc. Adv. Cytom. 2010, 77, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Condé-Green, A.; Rodriguez, R.L.; Slezak, S.; Singh, D.P.; Goldberg, N.H.; McLenithan, J. Comparison between Stromal Vascular Cells’ Isolation with Enzymatic Digestion and Mechanical Processing of Aspirated Adipose Tissue. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014, 134, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Yoshimura, K.; Shigeura, T.; Matsumoto, D.; Sato, T.; Takaki, Y.; Aiba-Kojima, E.; Sato, K.; Inoue, K.; Nagase, T.; Koshima, I.; et al. Characterization of freshly isolated and cultured cells derived from the fatty and fluid portions of liposuction aspirates. J. Cell. Physiol. 2006, 208, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Aronowitz, J.A.; Lockhart, R.A.; Hakakian, C.S. Mechanical versus enzymatic isolation of stromal vascular fraction cells from adipose tissue. SpringerPlus 2015, 4, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Markarian, C.F.; Frey, G.Z.; Silveira, M.D.; Milani, A.R.; Ely, P.B.; Horn, A.P.; Nardi, N.B.; Camassola, M. Isolation of adipose-derived stem cells: A compar-ison among different methods. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Raposio, E.; Caruana, G.; Bonomini, S.; Libondi, G. A novel and effective strategy for the isolation of adipose-derived stem cells: Minimally manipulated adipose-derived stem cells for more rapid and safe stem cell therapy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014, 133, 1406–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Solodeev, I.; Meilik, B.; Gur, E.; Shani, N. A Closed-system Technology for Mechanical Isolation of High Quantities of Stromal Vascular Fraction from Fat for Immediate Clinical Use. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.—Glob. Open 2023, 11, e5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Al-Hajj, M.; Wicha, M.S.; Benito-Hernandez, A.; Morrison, S.J.; Clarke, M.F. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast can-cer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003, 100, 3983–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Li, C.; Heidt, D.G.; Dalerba, P.; Burant, C.F.; Zhang, L.; Adsay, V.; Wicha, M.; Clarke, M.F.; Simeone, D.M. Identification of Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yang, L.-Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, S.; Wen, J.-C.; Zheng, J.-K.; Chen, Q.; Li, W.-Y.; Wang, P.-P.; Ma, L.; Huang, T.-H.; et al. Several types of soft tissue sarcomas originate from the malignant transformation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2010, 3, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Koellensperger, E.; Bonnert, L.-C.; Zoernig, I.; Marmé, F.; Sandmann, S.; Germann, G.; Gramley, F.; Leimer, U. The impact of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells on breast cancer cells: Implications for cell-assisted lipotransfers in breast reconstruction. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chi, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, F.; Yang, Z.; Meng, L.; Yang, S.; Mao, A.; Zhang, J.; et al. Long-term cultured mesenchymal stem cells frequently develop genomic mutations but do not undergo malignant transformation. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Chen, G.; Yue, A.; Ruan, Z.; Yin, Y.; Wang, R.; Ren, Y.; Zhu, L. Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Do Not Undergo Malignant Transformation during Long-Term Culturing in Serum-Free Medium. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Bapat, A.; Kalodimou, V.E.; Muthu, S. Regulatory concerns for exosome-and other extracellular vesicle-based diagnostics and medicine products. In Extracellular Vesicles for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 523–536. [Google Scholar]
  186. Raposio, E.; Ciliberti, R. Clinical use of adipose-derived stem cells: European legislative issues. Ann. Med. Surg. 2017, 24, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zocchi, M.L.; Vindigni, V.; Pagani, A.; Pirro, O.; Conti, G.; Sbarbati, A.; Bassetto, F. Regulatory, ethical, and technical considerations on regenerative technologies and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Eur. J. Plast. Surg. 2019, 42, 531–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Nguyen, T.A.; Hogden, A.; Khanna, A.; Kuah, D. Efficacy of adipose-derived stem cells and stromal vascular fraction for pain relief in Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review (2019–2024). J. Orthop. 2025, 70, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Lee, H.; Lim, Y.; Lee, S.-H. Rapid-acting pain relief in knee osteoarthritis: Autologous-cultured adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells outperform stromal vascular fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2024, 15, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Maeda, T.; Sobajima, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Tsubosaka, M.; Matsushita, T.; Iwaguro, H.; Kuroda, R. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of intra-articular injection of micro-fragmented adipose tissue and stromal vascular fraction cells for knee osteoarthritis treatment: A retrospective single-center cohort study. Regen. Ther. 2025, 29, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Yang, Y.; Lan, Z.; Yan, J.; Tang, Z.; Zhou, L.; Jin, D.; Jin, Q. Effect of intra-knee injection of autologous adipose stem cells or mesenchymal vascular components on short-term outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2023, 25, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Kim, K.I.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, J.H. Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stem Cells or Stromal Vascular Frac-tions: Are They Effective for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Con-trolled Trials. Am. J. Sports Med. 2023, 51, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Anil, U.; Markus, D.H.; Hurley, E.T.; Manjunath, A.K.; Alaia, M.J.; Campbell, K.A.; Jazrawi, L.M.; Strauss, E.J. The efficacy of intra-articular injections in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee 2021, 32, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Zhang, C.; Lu, Y.; Huang, Y. Clinical efficacy of cell-free fat extract and its effects on bone marrow edema in patients with early to mid-stage knee osteoarthritis: A clinical trial in comparison with hyaluronic acid. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2025, 20, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Nonaka, T.; Murata, D.; Yoshizato, H.; Kashimoto, S.; Nakamura, A.; Morimoto, T.; Nakayama, K. Bio-3D printing of scaffold-free ADSC-derived cartilage constructs comparable to natural cartilage in vitro. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2025, 20, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Peng, X.; Song, W.; Yan, Z.; Zhai, W.; Ren, L. Gelatin microcarriers as an effective adipose-derived stem cells delivery strategy in osteoarthritis treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 283, 137524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Wu, Y.-Q.; Wang, J. Sequential release of transforming growth factor β1 and fibroblast growth factor 2 from nanofibrous scaffolds induces cartilage differentiation of mouse adipose-derived stem cells. Biointerphases 2024, 19, 041002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zhao, J.; Yan, Z.; Ding, Y.; Dai, Y.; Feng, Z.; Li, Z.; Ma, L.; Diao, N.; Guo, A.; Yin, H. A Hybrid Scaffold Induces Chondrogenic Differentiation and Enhances In Vivo Cartilage Regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 2025, 31, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lee, C.-Y.; Nedunchezian, S.; Lin, S.-Y.; Su, Y.-F.; Wu, C.-W.; Wu, S.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Wang, C.-K. Bilayer osteochondral graft in rabbit xenogeneic transplantation model comprising sintered 3D-printed bioceramic and human adipose-derived stem cells laden biohydrogel. J. Biol. Eng. 2023, 17, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 14 00669 g001
Figure 1. Mechanisms of action of MFAT and SVF within the OA joint. MFAT provides a biological scaffold to buffer joint pressure and support cartilage regeneration, while SVF delivers active cells to suppress inflammation and promote cartilage repair.
Figure 1. Mechanisms of action of MFAT and SVF within the OA joint. MFAT provides a biological scaffold to buffer joint pressure and support cartilage regeneration, while SVF delivers active cells to suppress inflammation and promote cartilage repair.
Cells 14 00669 g001
Cells 14 00669 g002
Figure 2. DFAT’s production and use. Adipose tissue is treated mechanically and with digestive enzymes. Mature adipocytes are then separated by centrifugation and transferred to culture flasks filled with culture medium. At first, they are in the upper layer of the culture medium due to their buoyancy. Over time, the adipocytes lose their lipids and transform into DFAT cells with the shape of fibroblasts. The flasks are then inverted to continue the culture of DFAT. DFAT cells are widely used in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, providing a new approach to tissues such as muscle, bone, cartilage and vascular endothelium, and nerve repair.
Figure 2. DFAT’s production and use. Adipose tissue is treated mechanically and with digestive enzymes. Mature adipocytes are then separated by centrifugation and transferred to culture flasks filled with culture medium. At first, they are in the upper layer of the culture medium due to their buoyancy. Over time, the adipocytes lose their lipids and transform into DFAT cells with the shape of fibroblasts. The flasks are then inverted to continue the culture of DFAT. DFAT cells are widely used in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, providing a new approach to tissues such as muscle, bone, cartilage and vascular endothelium, and nerve repair.
Cells 14 00669 g002
Cells 14 00669 g003
Figure 3. Isolation, design, and therapeutic efficacy of ADSC-EVs in OA treatment: ADSC-EVs were obtained by ultracentrifugation, and these EVs have multiple therapeutic effects on cartilage regeneration. First, they modulate macrophage polarisation by promoting IL10 and TGF- β and inhibit pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Second, ADSC-EVs support cartilage repair by inhibiting catabolic enzymes (MMP1, MMP3, MMP13, and ADAMTS, etc.) and enhancing the production of extracellular matrix components (including Sox9, Acan, and Col2a1) to support cartilage repair. In addition, they regulate chondrocyte autophagy and promote intracellular homeostasis through pathways such as AMPK/mTOR/ULK1. ADSC-EVs can be engineered to enhance their therapeutic potential.
Figure 3. Isolation, design, and therapeutic efficacy of ADSC-EVs in OA treatment: ADSC-EVs were obtained by ultracentrifugation, and these EVs have multiple therapeutic effects on cartilage regeneration. First, they modulate macrophage polarisation by promoting IL10 and TGF- β and inhibit pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Second, ADSC-EVs support cartilage repair by inhibiting catabolic enzymes (MMP1, MMP3, MMP13, and ADAMTS, etc.) and enhancing the production of extracellular matrix components (including Sox9, Acan, and Col2a1) to support cartilage repair. In addition, they regulate chondrocyte autophagy and promote intracellular homeostasis through pathways such as AMPK/mTOR/ULK1. ADSC-EVs can be engineered to enhance their therapeutic potential.
Cells 14 00669 g003
Cells 14 00669 g004
Figure 4. Preparation process of CEFFE from adipose tissue: (1) Adipose tissue is collected through surgical excision or liposuction. (2) The sample undergoes the first centrifugation, separating it into oil, fat, and liquid layers. (3) The fat is emulsified using mechanical shear forces. (4) A freeze–thaw cycle at −80 °C disrupts cell membranes, releasing bioactive factors. (5) A second centrifugation further separates four distinct layers: oil, fat, liquid, and cell debris. (6) The liquid phase is filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane to obtain CEFFE.
Figure 4. Preparation process of CEFFE from adipose tissue: (1) Adipose tissue is collected through surgical excision or liposuction. (2) The sample undergoes the first centrifugation, separating it into oil, fat, and liquid layers. (3) The fat is emulsified using mechanical shear forces. (4) A freeze–thaw cycle at −80 °C disrupts cell membranes, releasing bioactive factors. (5) A second centrifugation further separates four distinct layers: oil, fat, liquid, and cell debris. (6) The liquid phase is filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane to obtain CEFFE.
Cells 14 00669 g004
Table 2. Clinical studies of SVF in the treatment of OA.
Table 2. Clinical studies of SVF in the treatment of OA.
TimeCountryPatient NumberPosition (KL)Age (Mean, Years)Follow-UpResultsComplicationsReference
2017Japan13 (2M/11F)Knee OA (II-IV) 74.5 ± 5.4 6 months↓ WOMAC score (%), VASPain and swelling in injection and fat harvesting sites[61]
2018China16 (3M/13F)Knee OA (II-IV)53 ± 10.97 (left)
51 ± 5.95 (right)		12 months↓ VAS, WOMAC score (%)
↑ ROM		Pain in fat harvesting site (25% of patients)
Post-injection pain (37.5% of patients)		[51]
2019Italy20 (9M/11F)Knee OA (I-IV)59.6 ± 10.518 months↓ VAS, WOMAC score (%)One case of occult swelling in the suprapatellar region
Most patients felt “tied knee”		[62]
2019Croatia20 (15M/5F)Knee OA (III-IV) 40–85 12 months↓ VAS, WOMAC score (%)
↑ KOOS		None[63]
2019Japan38 (7M/31F)Knee OA (II-IV)73 ± 9.16 months↓ VAS; ↑ KOOSKnee joint effusion after injection (8% of patients)
Minor complications in fat harvesting site (34% of patients)		[15]
2020America39 (17M/22F)Knee OA (II-III)59.0 ± 9.912 months↑ WOMAC score (%) Post-injection pain and swelling (1 patient)[64]
2020Japan57 (41M/16F)Knee OA (II-IV)69.4 ± 6.912 months↓ VAS, WOMAC score (%) and ↑ KOOS
↑ MRI: T2 mapping values of lateral femur and tibia
↑ knee extension angle		None[52]
2020Germany12 (7M/5F)Knee OA (III-IV)61 (51–80)12 months↑ KOOS; subjective satisfaction: 67%Post-injection painless swelling
Haematoma and muscle soreness in fat harvesting site		[65]
2022China47 (18M/29F)Knee OA (II-III)50.83 ± 10.8812 months↓ cartilage defect thickness, VAS, WOMAC score (%)Post-injection pain and swelling[66]
2022Germany33 (18M/15F)Knee OA (I-IV)60.58(23–88)12 months↓ VAS and ↑ KOOS
↑ VR12 psychological scores		None[57]
2022Japan38 (18% M/82% F)Knee OA (II-IV)73.6 ± 924 months↓ VAS and ↑ KOOSPain, bleeding, induration in fat harvesting site (13 patients)
Post-injection pain and swelling (3 knees)		[67]
2022Russia16 (7M/9F)Knee OA (II-IV)61 (57–64)12 months↓ VAS and ↑ KOOSAlmost all patients had post-injection site discomfort;
some reported painless swelling at the injection site
A proportion of 27% of patients had a slight increase in temperature (37.2–37.6 °C)		[68]
2023India58Knee OA (I-III)45–8536 months↓ VAS and ↑ KOOSPain, swelling, and bruising in fat harvesting site (some patients)[69]
2023JapanSingle injection group: 30 (8M/22F)
Double injection group: 24 (6M/18F)		Knee OA (II-IV)Single injection group: 68.8 ± 8.2
Double injection group: 69.1 ± 11.8		24 months↓ WOMAC score
↑ HKA angle and the mean T2 mapping values 		Post-injection pain and swelling 9.3% (single injection group) and 8.3% (double injection group)[70]
2023Japan42 (5M/37F)Hip OA (II-IV)60.2 ± 9.4 6 months ↑ HHS, JHEQ scores and ↓ VASMild hip pain (5 patients (11.9%))[60]
2024USA29 (9M/20F)Knee OA (II-IV)65.612 months↑ KOOSMild to moderate post-injection pain or itching (6 patients)
Mild to moderate pain, bruising, subcutaneous haematoma or numbness in fat harvesting site (17 patients)		[56]
2025Germany25 (14M/11F)Knee OA (IV)53–6724 months↓ VAS and ↑ KOOS, ADL and QOL scoresNone[58]
M: male; F: female; KL: Kellgren–Lawrence; VAS: visual analogue scale; KOOS: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; DASH: Disabilities of the Arm and Shoulder; PRWE: Patient Wrist Evaluation; ROM: Range of Motion; HKA: Hip–Knee–Ankle; HHS: Harris Hip Score; JHEQ: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire; ADL: Activity of Daily Living; QOL: quality of life.
Table 3. DFAT and regenerative medicine research.
Table 3. DFAT and regenerative medicine research.
TimeDiseaseAnimalResultsReference
2008Chronic renal dysfunctionMiceImprovement of glomerulosclerosis,
↓ TGF-β1 and fibronectin mRNA in renal cortex
↓ serum BUN		[84]
2008Spinal cord injuryRat↑ βIII microtubule protein; BDNF; GDNF[85]
2012Infarcted myocardiumMice↑ endothelial cells[81]
2014Periodontal tissue lossRat↑ proliferating cell nuclear antigen; periodontal tissue regeneration[86]
2014 Spinal cord injury Mice↑ motor function of the hind limbs; neurotrophic factor; astrocytes and oligodendrocytes[87]
2015Artificial dermal graftRat↑ capillary infiltration; endothelial cells; thickness of dermal-like tissue[88]
2015Light-agedMice↑ TGF-β1; collagen I and III
↓ MMP-1 and MMP-3		[89]
2015GlomerulonephritisRat↑ TSG-6
↓ macrophage infiltration and IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12β		[90]
2016Vesicoureteral refluxRat↓ ureteral internal/external diameter ratio and connective tissue area in the posterior bladder wall
↓ apoptosis of renal pelvic urinary tract epithelial cells		[91]
2017Hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathyRat↓ brain cell death rate[92]
2018Cerebral infarctionMice↑ Nestin and SOX2; functional recovery[93]
2018Knee cartilage defectRat↑ Sox9; collagen II (COL2A1)
↑ ICRS score; modified O’Driscol histological score		[77]
2019Facial nerve defectsRat↑ number of myelinated fibres; thickness of myelin sheaths in the spinal cord[94]
2019Mandibular bone defectRat↑ bone regenerationd; bone width[95]
2020Inflammatory bowel diseaseMice↑ TRAIL, IDO1, and NOS2
↓ T-cell proliferation		[96]
2021Mandibular defects in osteoporoticRat↑ ERK1/2 and Smad2 phosphorylation signalling pathways[97]
2022Intra-periodontal bone defects Rat↑ ALP, Runx2, OPN[98]
2022GlomerulonephritisMice↑ microRNA 23b-3p; TSG-6 mRNA; PGE2 and IL-10 mRNAs; CCL-17
↓ CD44 mRNA; TNF-α and MCP-1		[99]
2022Periodontal Class II bifurcation defectsSmall porcine↑ cytoskeletal, periodontal ligament-like fibres and alveolar bone formation[100]
2022Persistent stress urinary incontinenceRat↑ leak point pressure; urethral transverse muscle; smooth muscle[101]
2023Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitisRat↓ IL-6; CCL-2[102]
2024OARat↑ PTGS2, TNFAIP6, and BMP2; ↓ ADAMTS4 and IL6 in synovial fibroblasts[82]
2024Anorectal sphincter dysfunctionRat↑ MyoD and myogenin genes; mature myocytes[103]
TGF-β1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; GDNF, Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor; BDNF, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; TSG-6, Tumour necrosis factor-inducible gene 6; IL, interleukin; SOX, Sex-determining region Y-box; ICRS, International Cartilage Repair Society; TRAIL, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; IDO1, Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; NOS2, Nitric oxide synthase 2; ALP, Alkaline phosphatase; Runx2, Runt-related transcription factor 2; OPN, Osteopontin; TNF-α, Tumour necrosis factor-α; MCP-1, Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1; CCL, C-C motif chemokine ligand; PTGS2, prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2; TNFAIP6, Tumour Necrosis Factor-Inducible Gene 6 Protein; BMP2, Bone morphogenetic protein 2; ADAMTS4, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 4; MyoD, Myoblast determination protein 1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Felthaus, O.; Prantl, L. Adipose Tissue-Derived Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Multifaceted Mechanisms and Clinical Prospects. Cells 2025, 14, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090669

AMA Style

Zhang H, Felthaus O, Prantl L. Adipose Tissue-Derived Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Multifaceted Mechanisms and Clinical Prospects. Cells. 2025; 14(9):669. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hanwen, Oliver Felthaus, and Lukas Prantl. 2025. "Adipose Tissue-Derived Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Multifaceted Mechanisms and Clinical Prospects" Cells 14, no. 9: 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090669

APA Style

Zhang, H., Felthaus, O., & Prantl, L. (2025). Adipose Tissue-Derived Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Multifaceted Mechanisms and Clinical Prospects. Cells, 14(9), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090669

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop