Next Article in Journal
Six1-Eya1 Axis Governs Myofiber Remodeling and Fibrosis in Extraocular Myopathy: Insights from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Thyroid Eye Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of the ECM on the Mechanical Memory of Cancer Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling

by
Agnieszka Nowacka
1,*,
Maciej Śniegocki
1 and
Ewa A. Ziółkowska
2,*
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Nicolas Copernicus University in Toruń, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, ul. Curie Skłodowskiej 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2025, 14(21), 1709; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14211709
Submission received: 29 September 2025 / Revised: 23 October 2025 / Accepted: 30 October 2025 / Published: 31 October 2025

Abstract

Astrocytic calcium signaling is a central mechanism of neuron-glia communication that operates across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Traditionally, research has focused on intracellular Ca2+ oscillations that regulate gliotransmitter release, ion homeostasis, and metabolic support. Recent evidence, however, reveals that extracellular calcium ([Ca2+]o) is not a passive reservoir but a dynamic signaling mediator capable of influencing neuronal excitability within milliseconds. Through mechanisms such as calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) activation, ion channel modulation, surface charge effects, and ephaptic coupling, astrocytes emerge as active partners in both slow and rapid modes of communication. This dual perspective reshapes our understanding of brain physiology and disease. Disrupted Ca2+ signaling contributes to network instability in epilepsy, synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, and impaired maturation in neurodevelopmental disorders. Methodological advances, including Ca2+-selective microelectrodes, genetically encoded extracellular indicators, and computational modeling, are beginning to uncover the richness of extracellular Ca2+ dynamics, though challenges remain in achieving sufficient spatial and temporal resolution. By integrating classical intracellular pathways with emerging insights into extracellular signaling, this review highlights astrocytes as central architects of the ionic landscape. Recognizing calcium as both an intracellular messenger and an extracellular signaling mediator provides a unifying framework for neuron–glia interactions and opens new avenues for therapeutic intervention.

1. Introduction

Astrocytes, once regarded as passive “glue,” are now recognized as dynamic regulators of brain activity [1,2]. A pivotal discovery came in 1990, when Cornell-Bell and colleagues demonstrated that astrocytes respond to neurotransmitters with intracellular calcium (Ca2+) elevations, establishing them as excitable partners in neural networks [2,3]. Since then, it has become clear that astrocytic Ca2+ signaling shapes synaptic efficacy and circuit function across multiple timescales [4,5].
Calcium is central to this transformation. Unlike neurons that rely on action potentials, astrocytes use graded Ca2+ dynamics to integrate synaptic input and modulate neuronal activity. These signals are generated through diverse mechanisms, including endoplasmic reticulum release via inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3R), store-operated calcium entry (SOCE), metabotropic glutamate and purinergic receptors, voltage-gated channels, and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger reversal during neurotransmitter uptake [6,7,8]. Local Ca2+ microdomains influence individual synapses, while global waves propagate through astrocytic networks, enabling modulation of neuronal excitability with both spatial precision and temporal flexibility [9]. Functionally, these dynamics govern gliotransmitter release, extracellular ion homeostasis, and metabolic support [10,11,12].
Aberrant astrocytic Ca2+ signaling is implicated in epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease, where it destabilizes circuits through dysregulated gliotransmission and impaired ion regulation [6,12]. These observations underscore Ca2+ as both a physiological mediator and a therapeutic target.
Most reviews have emphasized intracellular Ca2+ oscillations and their role in gliotransmission. Here, we take a broader view by integrating these classical insights with emerging evidence that extracellular Ca2+ itself can act as a rapid signaling mediator. Recent advances, including Ca2+-selective microelectrodes, in vivo imaging with genetically encoded indicators, and optogenetic manipulations, reveal that fluctuations in extracellular calcium ([Ca2+]o) occur on millisecond timescales and directly influence neuronal excitability through mechanisms such as CaSR activation, ion channel modulation, and ephaptic coupling [9].
This review therefore synthesizes the established knowledge of intracellular Ca2+ regulation with novel concepts of extracellular dynamics. By examining how astrocytes sculpt both intracellular signals and the extracellular ionic landscape, we aim to highlight a unifying framework in which astrocytes emerge as active architects of neural communication and potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

2. Intracellular Calcium Signaling in Astrocytes: Established Mechanisms

2.1. Sources of Astrocytic Ca2+ Elevations

Astrocytes rely on multiple mechanisms to generate cytosolic Ca2+ elevations that encode information relevant to neuron-glia communication. A major source is the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where Ca2+ is released through inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) activated by G-protein-coupled receptors. In astrocytes, the principal GPCRs linked to Ca2+ mobilization include metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1/5), purinergic P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors, muscarinic M1/M3 acetylcholine receptors, adrenergic α1-receptors, and protease-activated receptors (PAR-1), all of which trigger phospholipase C–dependent IP3 production and subsequent ER Ca2+ release [4,6,7,8]. This store release is replenished by store-operated calcium entry (SOCE), a process coordinated by STIM (stromal interaction molecule) sensors and Orai (Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channel protein) channels at ER-plasma membrane junctions [6,7]. In addition to these canonical pathways, astrocytes express metabotropic glutamate and purinergic P2Y receptors, both of which mobilize intracellular Ca2+ through phospholipase C–dependent IP3 production [8]. Ionotropic receptors are less abundant but can provide localized Ca2+ entry in fine processes, contributing to microdomain signaling [9]. Although voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) are not as prominent as in neurons, evidence across brain regions indicates functional VGCC expression in subsets of astrocytes, where they contribute to depolarization-linked Ca2+ influx [6]. Another important route is the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (NCX), which can operate in reverse when intracellular Na+ rises after neurotransmitter uptake, thereby driving additional Ca2+ entry independently of ER stores [13,14]. Together, these pathways provide astrocytes with a versatile toolkit for shaping intracellular calcium dynamics. The principal mechanisms, their modes of activation, and functional consequences are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Spatial Organization of Ca2+ Signals

Astrocytic Ca2+ activity is highly compartmentalized, reflecting the complex morphology of these cells [15,16,17]. Local microdomains arise in thin perisynaptic processes where restricted geometry enables transient and spatially confined signals. Such microdomains can selectively influence nearby synapses without affecting distant compartments [18,19]. By contrast, global Ca2+ waves propagate through larger astrocytic territories, either via intracellular diffusion or through intercellular coupling [16,20]. Gap junctions composed of connexins allow Ca2+ waves to travel between astrocytes, while extracellular ATP released by one astrocyte can act on purinergic receptors of its neighbors to propagate signals across networks [9,10]. This dual organization enables astrocytes to operate at both local and global scales, fine-tuning synaptic transmission while also coordinating activity across broader brain regions.

2.3. Temporal Dynamics

Astrocytic Ca2+ signals are not uniform in time but span a wide spectrum of kinetics. Fast transients can occur within milliseconds to seconds and often follow bursts of neuronal activity, whereas slower components, including oscillations lasting minutes, shape long-term network states. Oscillatory patterns are particularly important because they can encode rhythmic information and influence neuronal excitability in a frequency-dependent manner [8]. Activity-dependent modulation ensures that astrocytic Ca2+ elevations scale with synaptic demand. For example, sensory stimulation in vivo evokes robust Ca2+ responses in cortical astrocytes, which are temporally aligned with neuronal firing and behavioral states [9]. The coexistence of fast, localized events with slower oscillations illustrates the flexibility of Ca2+ signaling in adapting to different modes of circuit operation.

2.4. Functional Consequences of Intracellular Ca2+

The functional consequences of astrocytic Ca2+ elevations are wide-ranging. One of the most studied outputs is gliotransmitter release. Elevations in intracellular Ca2+ can trigger exocytosis of glutamate, ATP, GABA, and D-serine, each exerting distinct effects on synaptic physiology [11,12]. For instance, Ca2+-dependent glutamate release enhances excitatory transmission via NMDA and metabotropic glutamate receptors, whereas ATP release can be converted to adenosine, which dampens synaptic activity and provides homeostatic control. These opposing influences highlight the bidirectional capacity of astrocytes to either amplify or suppress neuronal signaling depending on context. Beyond transmitter release, Ca2+ also regulates astrocytic metabolism, ion transport, and morphological plasticity [5,21,22]. By modulating Na+,K+-ATPase activity, astrocytes use Ca2+ as a signal to adjust extracellular potassium buffering, thereby stabilizing neuronal membrane potentials [10]. In parallel, Ca2+-dependent cytoskeletal remodeling contributes to dynamic changes in astrocytic processes that alter their engagement with synapses. Such multifunctional roles underscore why Ca2+ is considered a master regulator of astrocyte physiology and neuron-glia communication.

3. The Transition: From Intracellular to Extracellular Calcium Dynamics

3.1. Mechanisms Linking Intracellular Ca2+ to Extracellular Changes

Intracellular calcium dynamics in astrocytes are not confined to the cytosol, instead, they directly influence the composition of the extracellular milieu through a variety of transport and release mechanisms [5,17,23,24]. Among the most prominent are the Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (NCX and NCKX), which normally extrude Ca2+ in exchange for Na+ influx but can operate in reverse when intracellular Na+ rises during intense neurotransmitter uptake [25,26,27]. This reversal generates additional Ca2+ entry while simultaneously shaping extracellular calcium concentrations. Plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPases (PMCA) provide a complementary mechanism by actively exporting Ca2+ against its gradient, thereby contributing to the fine-tuning of perisynaptic calcium levels [28,29,30]. Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), although less abundant in astrocytes than in neurons, also participate in transmembrane fluxes. They allow for rapid influx during depolarization and, under certain conditions, mediate Ca2+ efflux when intracellular concentrations are elevated, further coupling astrocytic excitability to extracellular ion balance [16,31,32]. Beyond transporter, and channel-mediated fluxes, vesicular mechanisms provide an additional route linking intracellular and extracellular calcium. Vesicles enriched with Ca2+ can fuse with the plasma membrane during exocytosis, releasing their content directly into the extracellular space. Furthermore, astrocytes can secrete Ca2+-binding proteins through regulated exocytosis, effectively delivering molecules that alter local buffering capacity [6,13,33]. Together, these mechanisms ensure that intracellular Ca2+ elevations are rapidly translated into extracellular signals that neurons and neighboring glia can detect.

3.2. Extracellular Ca2+ Buffering Systems

The impact of astrocyte-driven calcium release depends not only on the flux itself but also on the buffering environment of the extracellular space. Calcium-binding proteins play a critical role in this regulation [4,16,22]. S100β, a member of the S100 family abundantly expressed in astrocytes, can be secreted into the extracellular milieu where it binds Ca2+ and participates in signaling through receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) [34,35,36]. Beyond buffering, extracellular S100β modulates neuronal growth, synaptic plasticity, and inflammatory responses, underscoring its dual role as a Ca2+-binding protein and signaling molecule. Other EF-hand (helix–loop–helix motif) Ca2+-binding proteins, such as calretinin and calbindin, traditionally studied in neurons, have also been detected in extracellular compartments where they contribute to shaping local calcium availability and signal propagation [37,38].
In parallel, the extracellular matrix (ECM) provides a structural scaffold with significant buffering capacity. Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans, with their high density of negative charges, can transiently bind divalent cations, effectively shaping diffusion profiles of Ca2+ in the extracellular space. Regional heterogeneity in matrix composition adds another layer of regulation: brain regions enriched in perineuronal nets may present different Ca2+ buffering properties compared to areas with more diffuse ECM organization [9,33,39,40]. These matrix-dependent differences help explain why extracellular calcium dynamics can vary across circuits despite similar astrocytic activity.

3.3. Spatial Constraints and Microenvironments

The translation of intracellular Ca2+ changes into extracellular signals is further sculpted by the geometry of neural microenvironments. In synaptic clefts, the restricted volume imposes strong constraints on diffusion, meaning that even modest Ca2+ fluxes from perisynaptic astrocytic processes can significantly alter local concentrations [16,22,41]. Such changes influence presynaptic release probability and postsynaptic excitability on a rapid timescale. The close apposition of fine astrocytic processes to excitatory synapses thus establishes a structural basis for astrocytes to act as modulators of extracellular calcium dynamics during ongoing synaptic activity [6,16,42]. Beyond synapses, soma–soma appositions offer another site of extracellular regulation. Recent work has described “satellite” astrocytes that envelop neuronal cell bodies, providing intimate contact zones where extracellular Ca2+ modulation can directly affect neuronal excitability [43,44]. The efficiency of this modulation depends not only on the molecular machinery involved but also on the geometry of the contact, with larger or more tightly sealed interfaces amplifying the impact of astrocytic Ca2+ handling.
Together, these findings highlight a transition in perspective: intracellular calcium signals in astrocytes are not isolated events but are continuously translated into extracellular changes through transporters, pumps, vesicular release, buffering proteins, and structural constraints. This interplay situates astrocytes as central architects of the extracellular calcium landscape, capable of influencing neuronal excitability and circuit function with both temporal precision and spatial specificity.

4. Extracellular Calcium as a Rapid Signaling Mediator

4.1. Evidence for Rapid [Ca2+]o Changes

For many years, astrocyte–neuron communication was framed almost exclusively in terms of gliotransmitter release. More recently, however, direct modulation of the extracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]o) has emerged as a complementary pathway, with evidence that [Ca2+]o can fluctuate on timescales previously considered unattainable for glia [14,42,45]. A critical advance has come from calcium-selective microelectrodes, which provide submillisecond resolution and reveal transient decreases in [Ca2+]o during bursts of synaptic activity. These drops occur locally in the synaptic cleft and recover quickly, indicating that astrocytic fluxes and neuronal uptake together can shape extracellular calcium on millisecond timescales [46,47,48]. Complementary in vivo imaging studies using genetically encoded extracellular calcium indicators have extended these observations to intact networks, showing that sensory stimulation and behavioral states are accompanied by rapid [Ca2+]o shifts in perisynaptic domains [49,50,51,52]. Optogenetic tools further strengthen causal links: when astrocytic Ca2+ pumps or exchangers are selectively activated or silenced, corresponding [Ca2+]o fluctuations can be observed in adjacent synapses [53,54,55,56]. Together, these methods converge on the conclusion that extracellular calcium is not a static reservoir but a dynamic signal capable of rapid modulation.

4.2. Mechanisms of Neuronal Sensitivity to [Ca2+]o

Neurons are exquisitely tuned to extracellular calcium, and small changes in [Ca2+]o can strongly influence excitability and synaptic function. One well-established pathway involves the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), a G-protein–coupled receptor expressed in subsets of neurons [44,57,58,59]. Activation of CaSR initiates intracellular cascades that regulate ion channel activity, neurotransmitter release, and gene expression, effectively coupling extracellular calcium availability to neuronal physiology [6,58,60,61].
Beyond CaSR, extracellular calcium acts directly on ion channels. Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels are influenced by surface charge screening, where Ca2+ ions shield negative charges on the membrane, shifting voltage dependence and altering pacemaker currents [6,61,62]. Small- and large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (SK and BK) can also be modulated by extracellular calcium indirectly through its effects on local depolarization and intracellular Ca2+ entry. More speculative but increasingly supported are roles for the sodium leak channel NALCN, which has been proposed to respond to changes in [Ca2+]o through mechanisms involving auxiliary subunits [27,44,62,63,64].
Surface charge effects add another layer of regulation. Because Ca2+ is divalent, it can screen fixed negative charges on the outer leaflet of the neuronal membrane, shifting the gating properties of voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels [6,65]. Even modest [Ca2+]o reductions, on the order of hundreds of micromolar, can depolarize neuronal thresholds and increase excitability, illustrating how extracellular calcium dynamics translate into functional consequences for spike initiation and propagation [62,66].
The principal neuronal targets of extracellular calcium are summarized in Table 2, and their anatomical distribution and functional effects are schematically illustrated in Figure 1.
Schematic representation of a neuron illustrating major mechanisms of sensitivity to extracellular calcium ([Ca2+]o). Calcium-sensing receptors (CaSR) located on dendrites detect changes in [Ca2+]o and couple them to intracellular signaling cascades. Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels and small- and large-conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channels (SK/BK) on dendrites are modulated by charge screening and local Ca2+ availability, influencing pacemaker activity and firing patterns. The sodium leak channel (NALCN) in the soma responds to changes in [Ca2+]o via auxiliary subunits, thereby affecting resting excitability. Surface charge effects of divalent Ca2+ on voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels alter their gating properties, shifting neuronal thresholds. Together, these mechanisms translate fluctuations in [Ca2+]o into changes in excitability, rhythmicity, and synaptic function. Abbreviations: CaSR—calcium-sensing receptor; HCN—hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel; SK—small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel; BK—big-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel; NALCN—sodium leak channel non-selective; NaV—voltage-gated sodium channel; KV—voltage-gated potassium channel.

4.3. Regional and Cell-Type Specificity

The sensitivity to [Ca2+]o is not uniform across the brain but exhibits pronounced cell-type and regional variation. Striatal cholinergic interneurons represent one of the most striking examples. Bennett and Wilson demonstrated that these cells show profound responsiveness to fluctuations in [Ca2+]o, a property amplified by their close association with satellite astrocytes that envelope the somata [40,67]. This arrangement creates restricted extracellular compartments where Ca2+ fluxes are particularly effective in shaping excitability.
Cortical pyramidal neurons also respond to local [Ca2+]o dynamics, with recent evidence suggesting that astrocytic processes in perisynaptic zones regulate activity-dependent calcium depletion during high-frequency firing [6,44,68]. In the brainstem, Morquette and colleagues have described neurons whose rhythmic activity is influenced by extracellular calcium changes, highlighting the diversity of mechanisms across regions. Comparative analysis suggests that [Ca2+]o-mediated modulation is a general phenomenon, but its exact role depends on both the structural configuration of astrocyte–neuron contacts and the intrinsic sensitivity of neuronal subtypes [6,10,42,69].

4.4. Functional Implications

The ability of extracellular calcium to act as a rapid signal carries important implications for network physiology. One domain is the generation and maintenance of network oscillations. Because [Ca2+]o shifts occur on millisecond scales, they can pace or reinforce rhythmic activity in the gamma and theta ranges. For example, periodic extracellular calcium dips can synchronize firing across populations by simultaneously modulating surface charge and ion channel gating. This ephaptic influence provides a non-synaptic mechanism for rhythm generation that complements synaptic inhibition and intrinsic pacemaker currents [6,33,66,70].
Synaptic plasticity represents another area where [Ca2+]o dynamics play a central role. On the presynaptic side, reduced [Ca2+]o can decrease release probability by limiting the driving force for Ca2+ entry, whereas elevated [Ca2+]o enhances release and supports short-term facilitation. Postsynaptically, fluctuations in extracellular calcium alter excitability by modulating NMDA receptor activity and voltage-gated channel thresholds. In this way, astrocyte-driven control of [Ca2+]o can directly affect the induction of long-term potentiation or depression [4,71,72,73]. Beyond presynaptic mechanisms, reduced extracellular calcium also exerts a direct impact on postsynaptic signaling. A lower [Ca2+]o diminishes the electrochemical driving force for Ca2+ entry through NMDA receptors and voltage-gated calcium channels, thereby attenuating the intracellular Ca2+ transients required for the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Computational and theoretical studies by Nicolas Brunel, Michael Graupner, and others have shown that even modest decreases in extracellular calcium can shift the threshold for synaptic plasticity, altering the balance between potentiation and depression by limiting postsynaptic Ca2+ influx. These findings emphasize that extracellular calcium homeostasis, largely shaped by astrocytic activity, is a key determinant of synaptic learning rules and network adaptability [71,72].
Together, these findings reposition extracellular calcium from a background ion to an active signaling mediator. By combining rapid kinetics, multiple modes of neuronal sensitivity, and regional specialization, [Ca2+]o dynamics provide a versatile mechanism through which astrocytes and neurons coordinate activity. This perspective not only broadens our understanding of glial physiology but also opens new avenues for explaining emergent properties of neural circuits.

5. Ephaptic Coupling: A New Paradigm for Astrocyte–Neuron Communication

5.1. Theoretical Framework

Ephaptic coupling refers to a form of electrical communication in which activity in one cell influences neighboring cells through changes in the extracellular ionic milieu and electric fields, without the need for synaptic transmission or gap junctions. Unlike chemical synapses, where neurotransmitters bind to receptors, or gap junctions, which permit direct cytoplasmic continuity, ephaptic interactions operate through modifications in the shared extracellular environment [74,75,76,77,78]. This mechanism has long been considered in the context of neuronal communication, particularly in tightly packed axon bundles, but accumulating evidence now suggests that astrocytes may also contribute to such field-based signaling. The physical basis lies in ion concentration gradients and local field potentials generated in narrow extracellular spaces, where diffusion is restricted and local changes in charge density can influence membrane excitability of adjacent cells [77,79,80].

5.2. Astrocyte-Mediated Ephaptic Mechanisms

Astrocytes are ideally positioned to shape ephaptic communication through their capacity to regulate extracellular ion fluxes. Potassium buffering provides a classic example: by clearing excess K+ released during neuronal firing, astrocytes modulate the extracellular potential and thus influence neuronal excitability on rapid timescales [13,14,35,81,82]. Emerging data suggest that calcium may serve a similar role, as fluctuations in extracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]o) can directly affect neuronal channels and receptors. Astrocytes, by releasing or sequestering calcium through exchangers, ATP-driven pumps, and vesicular routes, are capable of driving these changes in restricted microdomains [9]. Other ions, including Na+ and Cl, may also contribute, although their specific roles in astrocyte-mediated ephaptic signaling remain less well defined.
Geometry is central to the efficiency of this process. Ephaptic effects are strongest where the extracellular space is narrow, such as in synaptic clefts, perisynaptic astrocytic processes, and soma-to-soma contacts. In these compartments, the close apposition of astrocytic membranes to neurons amplifies the impact of local ionic shifts, while surface area considerations determine the extent of extracellular modulation. Recent studies on satellite astrocytes further emphasize that such structural arrangements are not random but are specialized to maximize the efficiency of field-based communication [44].

5.3. Functional Advantages

Ephaptic coupling offers several advantages compared with conventional communication modes. Because it relies on physical and ionic field effects, the signaling is extremely rapid, approaching the speed of electrical transmission without being constrained by receptor binding or vesicular release. This allows astrocytes to modulate neuronal excitability on timescales comparable to those of action potentials, bypassing the slower kinetics associated with gliotransmission [2,22,83,84,85,86]. Importantly, ephaptic mechanisms are inherently bidirectional: astrocytic activity can shape neuronal firing, while neuronal discharges can reciprocally alter astrocytic ionic states. This reciprocity enables a dynamic integration of network states, allowing local field changes to synchronize cellular ensembles across neuronal and glial populations. In doing so, ephaptic coupling extends the classical view of astrocytes as modulators of extracellular homeostasis toward a model in which they are active partners in fast information processing [22,76,87].

6. Pathological Implications and Disease Relevance

6.1. Disrupted Ca2+ Homeostasis in Neurological Disorders

Astrocytic calcium dynamics are highly sensitive to pathological stressors, and disturbances in these processes are now recognized as central features of several major neurological disorders [9,42].
In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), astrocytes display abnormal intracellular Ca2+ oscillations that amplify neuronal dysfunction. Amyloid-β aggregates alter the function of both metabotropic receptors and ion channels, producing exaggerated Ca2+ transients in astrocytes and interfering with extracellular calcium buffering [1,88,89]. These abnormalities destabilize gliotransmission, promote excitotoxic cascades, and impair amyloid clearance by disrupting Ca2+-dependent endocytosis. The net effect is a self-reinforcing cycle in which astrocytic Ca2+ dysregulation accelerates synaptic and cognitive decline [88,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97].
In contrast to the widespread alterations seen in AD, Parkinson’s disease (PD) involves more selective vulnerability. Evidence points to striatal astrocytes, which normally regulate extracellular Ca2+ in close apposition to cholinergic interneurons, key modulators of striatal circuits [98,99,100,101,102]. Pathological α-synuclein accumulation disrupts astrocytic Ca2+ handling, weakening their ability to maintain ionic stability and altering the balance between dopaminergic and cholinergic signaling. This impairment may underlie both motor dysfunction and cognitive decline in PD [91,99,103,104,105,106,107].
Epilepsy provides perhaps the clearest example of extracellular calcium dysregulation. During seizures, [Ca2+]o drops rapidly as neurons fire synchronously and astrocytes attempt to buffer the surge in ion flux [6,35,104,108,109,110,111,112]. Impaired astrocytic Ca2+ handling compromises their ability to restore ionic homeostasis, prolonging hyperexcitability and facilitating recurrent ictal activity. Aberrant Ca2+ oscillations in astrocytes have also been implicated in lowering seizure thresholds, underscoring that astrocytic dysfunction is not merely reactive but actively drives network instability [35,111,113,114].

6.2. Developmental Disorders

Disrupted astrocytic Ca2+ dynamics also intersect with developmental conditions. In autism spectrum disorders (ASD), postmortem and animal studies suggest that astrocytes fail to fully mature, leading to abnormal Ca2+ signaling profiles. These deficits can impair synapse formation, pruning, and plasticity, processes in which finely tuned astrocytic calcium responses are essential. The consequence is altered circuit wiring that may underlie core behavioral phenotypes of ASD [113]. Similarly, intellectual disabilities have been linked to genetic mutations in Ca2+-handling proteins, including IP3 receptors, STIM/Orai components of store-operated entry, and various exchangers. In astrocytes, such mutations disrupt intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and extracellular modulation, impairing the support they normally provide to neuronal networks [4,16,35,115]. Because these pathways are crucial during early postnatal development, their disruption can result in long-lasting deficits in synaptic connectivity and cognitive function.
The main neurological and developmental disorders associated with astrocytic Ca2+ dysregulation, their cellular consequences, and translational implications are summarized in Table 3.

6.3. Therapeutic Implications

The recognition that astrocytic Ca2+ dynamics influence both intracellular and extracellular compartments opens new therapeutic perspectives. Pharmacological targeting of extracellular calcium handling is one promising direction. Modulators of calcium-sensing receptors (CaSR) could, in principle, recalibrate neuronal sensitivity to [Ca2+]o fluctuations, while interventions that stabilize astrocytic Ca2+ buffering might reduce excitability in epilepsy or normalize synaptic signaling in AD [16,42,116,117]. However, specificity remains a challenge: drugs that broadly alter extracellular calcium risk disrupting essential functions such as synaptic transmission and vascular tone. Another emerging avenue is astrocyte transplantation. Grafting healthy astrocytes into damaged circuits has shown promise in experimental models of epilepsy and neurodegeneration, restoring more physiological Ca2+ dynamics and rebalancing excitatory–inhibitory activity [23,24,35]. Future strategies may combine transplantation with genetic engineering to enhance Ca2+-handling capacity or tailor responses to disease contexts [118,119,120,121]. Together, these findings position astrocytic Ca2+ dysregulation as a convergent pathway across diverse diseases. Whether the disorder originates from protein aggregates, ion channel mutations, or developmental abnormalities, the end result often involves mismanaged Ca2+ signaling and disturbed astrocyte–neuron communication. Interventions that restore balanced Ca2+ flux hold the potential to stabilize networks and modify disease trajectories.

7. Technical Considerations and Methodological Advances

7.1. Current Techniques for Studying [Ca2+]o

The study of extracellular calcium dynamics has been propelled by major advances in experimental methodology. The earliest and most direct measurements relied on calcium-selective microelectrodes, which provided high temporal resolution but were limited in spatial precision. These electrodes can detect rapid [Ca2+]o fluctuations in the submillisecond range and remain valuable for quantifying fast changes during synaptic activity. However, their invasive nature, relatively large size compared to microdomains, and sensitivity to drift constrain their ability to capture localized events within restricted extracellular spaces [65,122,123].
Fluorescent indicators expanded the field by enabling visualization of [Ca2+]o changes with higher spatial resolution. Early small-molecule dyes were limited by diffusion and poor specificity for the extracellular compartment, but refinements in loading strategies and chemical modifications have improved their performance. Two-photon microscopy further increased spatial resolution and allowed investigators to map [Ca2+]o signals in intact tissue, including awake animals. Still, such indicators are typically less sensitive than electrodes for very rapid kinetics and may underestimate the amplitude of transient drops in calcium [124,125].
More recently, genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) tailored for the extracellular space have emerged. By targeting GCaMP variants or engineered calcium-binding proteins to the plasma membrane or secreted domains, researchers can directly monitor extracellular calcium dynamics with cellular or even subcellular resolution [126,127,128]. These tools are still in development but offer the potential for long-term monitoring, cell-type specificity, and integration with optogenetics. Future iterations aim to combine high affinity with rapid kinetics, bridging the gap between electrode speed and imaging flexibility [9,125,129].
In parallel, fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) has emerged as a complementary approach for studying calcium dynamics and cellular metabolism with nanosecond temporal precision. Unlike intensity-based imaging, FLIM measures the fluorescence decay time of Ca2+ indicators such as Fura-2 or GCaMP-based sensors, providing a quantitative, concentration-independent assessment of calcium fluctuations [130,131,132]. This method can distinguish free versus protein-bound Ca2+ pools and is less affected by dye loading or photobleaching artifacts. Importantly, FLIM enables the simultaneous assessment of calcium signaling and metabolic state through autofluorescence lifetime measurements of NADH and FAD, offering new insights into how astrocytic Ca2+ fluxes intersect with energy metabolism and redox balance. Although still technically demanding and limited in imaging depth, FLIM provides a powerful framework for linking ionic signaling with metabolic function in intact brain tissue [130,131,132].

7.2. Challenges and Limitations

Despite these advances, significant methodological challenges remain. Spatial resolution is a primary concern: extracellular calcium signals often occur in microdomains of a few tens of nanometers around synapses or perisynaptic astrocytic processes, far below the resolution of conventional microscopy [133,134]. As a result, bulk measurements risk averaging across compartments and obscuring localized dynamics. Diffusion artifacts further complicate interpretation, as extracellular calcium gradients are steep and can dissipate during experimental manipulation [9,135,136]. Temporal resolution is an equally pressing limitation. Millisecond-scale fluctuations may drive neuronal excitability, but most optical indicators cannot yet capture such rapid kinetics [137,138]. Distinguishing cause from effect also remains difficult, since changes in [Ca2+]o can arise from multiple sources, neuronal influx, astrocytic release, or buffering proteins, and current methods rarely allow for precise separation of these contributions. In addition, methodological constraints such as indicator buffering, phototoxicity, or unintended perturbation of the extracellular milieu can bias results. Thus, both spatial and temporal resolution remain limiting factors, constraining our ability to capture the full dynamics of [Ca2+]o [72,139,140].
The main experimental approaches to study extracellular calcium dynamics, their resolution limits, advantages, and typical applications are summarized in Table 4.

7.3. Future Technological Needs

Addressing these challenges will require the development of tools that combine high spatial and temporal resolution with minimal invasiveness. Chronic in vivo monitoring of [Ca2+]o in behaving animals is a key frontier, as it would allow researchers to link extracellular calcium dynamics directly to physiological states and behavioral outputs. Implantable biosensors or improved GECIs optimized for extracellular use may provide such capabilities [136,141,142,143,144,145]. Alongside experimental tools, computational approaches are expected to play a complementary role. Biophysical simulations can predict how synaptic activity, astrocytic buffering, and matrix composition interact to shape [Ca2+]o microdomains. Integrating these models with empirical measurements will help disentangle overlapping processes and identify causal mechanisms. Furthermore, machine learning approaches applied to large imaging datasets may uncover patterns of extracellular calcium dynamics that are difficult to detect by conventional analysis [146,147,148,149].
In sum, while significant progress has been made, the field still lacks a gold-standard technique capable of resolving extracellular calcium signals with the fidelity routinely achieved for intracellular Ca2+ imaging. Bridging this gap will be essential not only for a complete understanding of astrocyte–neuron communication but also for validating emerging concepts such as ephaptic coupling.
Table 4. Experimental tools to study extracellular Ca2+ dynamics.
Table 4. Experimental tools to study extracellular Ca2+ dynamics.
MethodSpatial ResolutionTemporal ResolutionAdvantagesLimitationsTypical ApplicationsRefs.
Calcium-selective microelectrodesLimited (micrometer scale, relatively large tip size)High (submillisecond range)Direct quantitative measurements, high temporal resolution, minimal buffering effects, real-time monitoringInvasive, sensitivity to drift and interference, poor spatial precision for microdomains, limited to point measurementsDetecting rapid [Ca2+]o fluctuations during synaptic activity and network events[133,134,135,142]
Small-molecule fluorescent dyesModerate (micrometer scale)Moderate (millisecond to second range, dependent on dye kinetics)Improved spatial resolution over electrodes, visualization of spatial patterns, variety of affinity ranges availableLimited extracellular compartment specificity, potential dye diffusion and loading issues, phototoxicity during prolonged imaging, buffering effects at high concentrations; photobleachingMapping [Ca2+]o spatial distributions in tissue preparations and acute slices[124,125,136,139]
Confocal microscopyHigh (subcellular, ~200–500 nm lateral)Moderate to high (milliseconds to seconds, depending on scanning mode)Good optical sectioning; reduced out-of-focus fluorescence, compatible with multiple fluorophoresLimited penetration depth (<100 μm typically), phototoxicity and photobleaching; temporal resolution limited by scanning speedDetailed spatial mapping of [Ca2+]o in superficial layers, co-localization studies[49,124,139]
Two-photon microscopyHigh (subcellular, ~300–700 nm lateral)Variable (milliseconds to seconds, depending on scanning configuration and indicator)Deep tissue penetration (up to ~1 mm), reduced phototoxicity and photobleaching, compatible with in vivo imaging in awake animalsMay underestimate amplitude of rapid transient Ca2+ changes, slower scanning can miss fast events, expensive instrumentation, still subject to phototoxicity during chronic imaging[Ca2+]o visualization in intact neural circuits, deep tissue and in vivo studies[46,49,69,138,143]
GECIs for extracellular monitoringCellular to subcellular resolutionDeveloping (currently limited by indicator kinetics)Long-term monitoring; cell-type and compartment specificity, genetic targeting, integration with optogeneticsTechnology still under development, need to optimize affinity and kinetics for extracellular environment, potential buffering effects, phototoxicity during chronic imaging, expression level variabilityTargeted monitoring of extracellular Ca2+ dynamics in specific cell populations or microdomains[126,127,128,136,138]
Advanced scanning techniques (resonant scanners, acousto-optic deflectors, spinning disk)High (subcellular)Very high (submillisecond to millisecond range)Enhanced temporal resolution, reduced motion artifacts, improved ability to capture fast Ca2+ transientsHardware-dependent performance, may sacrifice signal-to-noise ratio for speed, specialized and expensive equipmentCapturing rapid [Ca2+]o dynamics during high-frequency neuronal activity[143]
Implantable biosensorsUnder development (potentially cellular scale)Under development (potentially millisecond range)Potential for chronic in vivo monitoring; minimal invasiveness; real-time physiological measurementsEmerging technology, biocompatibility concerns, calibration challenges, long-term stability issuesLinking [Ca2+]o dynamics to physiological states and behavior in freely moving animals[126,128,136]
Computational modelingTheoretical (nanometer to tissue scale, parameter-dependent)Theoretical (microsecond to second range, timestep-dependent)Predict microdomain dynamics inaccessible to current techniques, disentangle overlapping processes; identify causal mechanisms, test hypotheses in silicoRequires empirical validation, model assumptions and simplifications may limit accuracy, dependent on quality of input parametersBiophysical simulations of synaptic activity, astrocytic buffering effects, and [Ca2+]o dynamics in restricted spaces[8,41,74,135,141]

8. Future Directions and Unresolved Questions

Despite rapid progress, many aspects of astrocytic calcium signaling remain incompletely understood. At the molecular level, the identity of the precise transporters and exchangers that dominate extracellular calcium dynamics is still debated. While Na+–Ca2+ exchangers, Ca2+-ATPases, and vesicular pathways have been implicated [4,5,16], the relative contributions of each mechanism across different compartments of astrocytes and brain regions remain to be clarified. Another unresolved issue concerns the regulation of S100β and other calcium-binding proteins in the extracellular space [34,36]. Their release appears activity-dependent, yet the triggers and signaling consequences are poorly defined.
Establishing physiological relevance is equally important. Most studies so far have been carried out in cultured cells or acute slice preparations [6,150]. Verification in vivo, particularly under behaviorally relevant conditions, will be necessary to determine how extracellular calcium fluctuations shape neural circuit function. Linking these dynamics to cognition, sensory processing, or motor control remains a frontier challenge. From an evolutionary standpoint, it also remains unclear whether extracellular calcium signaling represents a conserved feature across species or whether it has emerged more recently in mammals alongside the expansion of astrocyte complexity. Developmental studies may help determine when these mechanisms first appear and how they contribute to circuit maturation.
Several emerging research areas hold promise for resolving these gaps. Multi-scale computational modeling can integrate molecular data with circuit-level dynamics, providing a framework to predict how calcium microdomains scale up to influence network behavior [151,152]. Optogenetic and chemogenetic tools now allow for cell-type–specific manipulations with high temporal precision, which can directly test causal relationships between astrocytic calcium fluxes and neuronal outcomes [16,148,153,154]. At the single-cell level, the growing appreciation of astrocyte heterogeneity suggests that individual subpopulations may contribute differently to calcium signaling. Combining single-cell transcriptomics with functional imaging may uncover distinct repertoires of transporters, receptors, and coupling strategies.
Translational opportunities are beginning to emerge. Extracellular calcium fluctuations, if reliably detected, could serve as biomarkers of brain health. Non-invasive monitoring strategies, ranging from improved calcium-sensitive dyes to biosensor-based imaging, may eventually allow clinicians to track these dynamics in patients. On the therapeutic side, selectively targeting astrocyte–neuron calcium interactions offers an avenue for precision medicine. Modulators of Ca2+ exchangers, blockers of aberrant gliotransmission, or interventions aimed at restoring buffering proteins like S100β could provide new treatment strategies for epilepsy, neurodegeneration, and neurodevelopmental disorders [6,33,53,112].
In summary, the field now stands at a pivotal stage. The essential molecular actors are only partially identified, the in vivo significance of rapid extracellular calcium changes is still emerging, and the translational potential has yet to be realized. Future work that bridges molecular, cellular, and systems-level approaches will be critical for turning these open questions into actionable insights.

9. Conclusions

Astrocytic calcium signaling represents a versatile system that operates across intracellular and extracellular compartments. Classical studies established the importance of intracellular Ca2+ oscillations, gliotransmitter release, and ion homeostasis. Building on this foundation, recent evidence reveals that extracellular calcium ([Ca2+]o) is not a static reservoir but a dynamic signaling mediator capable of influencing neuronal excitability within milliseconds. Mechanisms such as CaSR activation, ion channel modulation, and ephaptic coupling position astrocytes as active partners in both slow and rapid modes of neural communication.
This broadened perspective has major implications for physiology and disease. By linking intracellular dynamics to extracellular modulation, astrocytes contribute to network oscillations, synaptic plasticity, and circuit synchronization. Conversely, dysregulation of Ca2+ signaling is now recognized as a convergent pathway in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, and developmental disorders, highlighting its relevance as a therapeutic target.
Although technical advances, ranging from Ca2+-selective electrodes to genetically encoded extracellular indicators, have opened new windows into these processes, significant challenges remain in resolving microdomain-scale and millisecond-range dynamics. Future progress will depend on combining improved tools with computational and translational approaches to clarify how extracellular calcium shapes neural circuits and how these pathways can be harnessed for clinical benefit.
In summary, astrocytes should be viewed not only as regulators of intracellular Ca2+ but also as architects of the extracellular ionic landscape. Recognizing this dual role reframes our understanding of neuron-glia interactions and provides new opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.Z.; Formal analysis, E.A.Z. and M.Ś.; Re-sources, E.A.Z. and A.N.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, E.A.Z.; Writing—Review & Editing, E.A.Z., A.N. and M.Ś.; Visualization, E.A.Z. and A.N.; Supervision, E.A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhou, T.; Zang, Y.; Li, J. Astrocyte Metabolism and Signaling Pathways in the CNS. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1217451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Murphy-Royal, C.; Ching, S.; Papouin, T. A Conceptual Framework for Astrocyte Function. Nat. Neurosci. 2023, 26, 1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Castro, M.A.D.; Volterra, A. Astrocyte Control of the Entorhinal Cortex—Dentate Gyrus Circuit: Relevance to Cognitive Processing and Impairment in Pathology. Glia 2021, 70, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goenaga, J.; Araque, A.; Kofuji, P.; Chao, D.H.M. Calcium Signaling in Astrocytes and Gliotransmitter Release. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2023, 15, 1138577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bai, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Han, B.; Xiang, X.; Huang, W.; Yao, H. Revisiting Astrocytic Calcium Signaling in the Brain. Fundam. Res. 2024, 4, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schulte, A.; Bieniussa, L.; Gupta, R.; Samtleben, S.; Bischler, T.; Doering, K.; Sodmann, A.; Rittner, H.L.; Blum, R. Homeostatic Calcium Fluxes, ER Calcium Release, SOCE, and Calcium Oscillations in Cultured Astrocytes Are Interlinked by a Small Calcium Toolkit. Cell Calcium 2022, 101, 102515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rose, C.R.; Ziemens, D.; Verkhratsky, A. On the Special Role of NCX in Astrocytes: Translating Na+-Transients into Intracellular Ca2+ Signals. Cell Calcium 2020, 86, 102154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pittà, M.D.; Volman, V.; Berry, H.; Parpura, V.; Volterra, A.; Ben-Jacob, E. Computational Quest for Understanding the Role of Astrocyte Signaling in Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Semyanov, A.; Henneberger, C.; Agarwal, A. Making Sense of Astrocytic Calcium Signals—From Acquisition to Interpretation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020, 21, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, F.; Smith, N.; Xu, Q.; Fujita, T.; Baba, A.; Matsuda, T.; Takano, T.; Bekar, L.K.; Nedergaard, M. Astrocytes Modulate Neural Network Activity by Ca2+-Dependent Uptake of Extracellular K+. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martín, R.; Bajo-Grañeras, R.; Moratalla, R.; Moratalla, R.; Perea, G.; Araque, A. Circuit-Specific Signaling in Astrocyte-Neuron Networks in Basal Ganglia Pathways. Science 2015, 349, 730–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Halassa, M.M.; Fellin, T.; Haydon, P.G. The Tripartite Synapse: Roles for Gliotransmission in Health and Disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2007, 13, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Verkhratsky, A.; Nedergaard, M. Physiology of Astroglia. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Verkhratsky, A.; Rodríguez, J.J.; Parpura, V. Calcium Signalling in Astroglia. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2011, 353, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Radin, D.P.; Cerne, R.; Witkin, J.M.; Lippa, A. High-Impact AMPAkines Elevate Calcium Levels in Cortical Astrocytes by Mobilizing Endoplasmic Reticular Calcium Stores. Neuroglia 2024, 5, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lines, J.; Baraibar, A.M.; Nanclares, C.; Martin, E.; Aguilar, J.; Kofuji, P.; Navarrete, M.; Araque, A. A Spatial Threshold for Astrocyte Calcium Surge. eLife 2024, 12, RP90046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Imrie, G.; Farhy-Tselnicker, I. Astrocyte Regulation of Behavioral Outputs: The Versatile Roles of Calcium. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2025, 19, 1606265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McCarthy, C.I.; Kavalali, E.T. Nano-Organization of Synaptic Calcium Signaling. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2024, 52, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wright, W.J.; Hedrick, N.G.; Komiyama, T. Distinct Synaptic Plasticity Rules Operate across Dendritic Compartments in Vivo during Learning. Science 2025, 388, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sanz-Gálvez, R.; Falardeau, D.; Kolta, A.; Inglebert, Y. The Role of Astrocytes from Synaptic to Non-Synaptic Plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1477985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Purushotham, S.S.; Buskila, Y. Astrocytic Modulation of Neuronal Signalling. Front. Netw. Physiol. 2023, 3, 1205544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garcia, D.W.; Jacquir, S. Astrocyte-Mediated Neuronal Irregularities and Dynamics: The Complexity of the Tripartite Synapse. Biol. Cybern. 2024, 118, 249–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ceglia, R.D.; Ledonne, A.; Litvin, D.; Lind, B.L.; Carriero, G.; Latagliata, E.C.; Bindocci, E.; Castro, M.A.D.; Savtchouk, I.; Vitali, I.; et al. Specialized Astrocytes Mediate Glutamatergic Gliotransmission in the CNS. Nature 2023, 622, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lalo, U.; Pankratov, Y. Astrocyte Ryanodine Receptors Facilitate Gliotransmission and Astroglial Modulation of Synaptic Plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1382010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. van Dijk, L.; Giladi, M.; Refaeli, B.; Hiller, R.; Cheng, M.H.; Bahar, İ.; Khananshvili, D. Key Residues Controlling Bidirectional Ion Movements in Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger. Cell Calcium 2018, 76, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ottolia, M.; John, S.; Hazan, A.; Goldhaber, J.I. The Cardiac Na+-Ca2+ Exchanger: From Structure to Function. Compr. Physiol. 2021, 12, 2681–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cobb-Lewis, D.E.; Sansalone, L.; Khaliq, Z.M. Contributions of the Sodium Leak Channel NALCN to Pacemaking of Medial Ventral Tegmental Area and Substantia Nigra Dopaminergic Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2023, 43, 6841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martin-de-Saavedra, M.D.; Santos, M.D.; Culotta, L.; Varea, O.; Spielman, B.; Parnell, E.; Forrest, M.P.; Gao, R.; Yoon, S.; McCoig, E.; et al. Shed CNTNAP2 Ectodomain Is Detectable in CSF and Regulates Ca2+ Homeostasis and Network Synchrony via PMCA2/ATP2B2. Neuron 2021, 110, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kowalski, A.; Betzer, C.; Larsen, S.T.; Gregersen, E.; Newcombe, E.A.; Bermejo, M.C.; Langkilde, A.E.; Kragelund, B.B.; Jensen, P.H.; Nissen, P. Monomeric α-Synuclein Activates the Plasma Membrane Calcium Pump. EMBO J. 2023, 1, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Greger, I.H. Regulating Calcium Flux through AMPA Glutamate Receptors. Cell Calcium 2024, 123, 102934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caudal, L.C.; Gobbo, D.; Scheller, A.; Kirchhoff, F. The Paradox of Astroglial Ca2+ Signals at the Interface of Excitation and Inhibition. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 609947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tewari, B.P.; Woo, A.M.; Prim, C.; Chaunsali, L.; Patel, D.C.; Kimbrough, I.F.; Engel, K.; Browning, J.L.; Campbell, S.L.; Sontheimer, H. Astrocytes Require Perineuronal Nets to Maintain Synaptic Homeostasis in Mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2024, 27, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ryczko, D.; Hanini-Daoud, M.; Condamine, S.; Bréant, B.J.B.; Fougère, M.; Araya, R.; Kolta, A. S100β—Mediated Astroglial Control of Firing and Input Processing in Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons of the Mouse Visual Cortex. J. Physiol. 2020, 599, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Leite, M.C.; Galland, F.; Guerra, M.C.; Rodrigues, L.; Taday, J.; Monteforte, P.T.; Hirata, H.; Gottfried, C.; Donato, R.; Smaili, S.S.; et al. Astroglial S100B Secretion Is Mediated by Ca2+ Mobilization from Endoplasmic Reticulum: A Study Using Forskolin and DMSO as Secretagogues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sumadewi, K.T.; de Liyis, B.G.; Linawati, N.M.; Widyadharma, I.P.E.; Astawa, I.N.M. Astrocyte Dysregulation as an Epileptogenic Factor: A Systematic Review. Egypt. J. Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2024, 60, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hernández-Ortega, K.; Canul-Euan, A.A.; Solís-Paredes, J.M.; Borboa-Olivares, H.; Reyes-Muñoz, E.; Estrada-Gutiérrez, G.; Camacho-Arroyo, I. S100B Actions on Glial and Neuronal Cells in the Developing Brain: An Overview. Front. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1425525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schwaller, B. Cytosolic Ca2+ Buffers Are Inherently Ca2+ Signal Modulators. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2019, 12, a035543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. González, L.L.; Garrie, K.; Turner, M.D. Role of S100 Proteins in Health and Disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2020, 1867, 118677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hofer, A.M.; Brown, E.M. Extracellular Calcium Sensing and Signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Deemyad, T.; Lüthi, J.; Spruston, N. Astrocytes Integrate and Drive Action Potential Firing in Inhibitory Subnetworks. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Toman, M.; Wade, J.; Verkhratsky, A.; Dallas, M.; Bithell, A.; Flanagan, B.; Harkin, J.; McDaid, L. The Influence of Astrocytic Leaflet Motility on Ionic Signalling and Homeostasis at Active Synapses. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Oliveira, J.F.; Araque, A. Astrocyte Regulation of Neural Circuit Activity and Network States. Glia 2022, 70, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stedehouder, J.; Brizee, D.; Slotman, J.A.; Pascual-Garcia, M.; Leyrer, M.L.; Bouwen, B.L.J.; Dirven, C.M.; Gao, Z.; Berson, D.M.; Houtsmuller, A.B.; et al. Local Axonal Morphology Guides the Topography of Interneuron Myelination in Mouse and Human Neocortex. eLife 2019, 8, e48615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stedehouder, J.; Roberts, B.M.; Raina, S.; Bossi, S.; Liu, A.K.L.; Doig, N.M.; McGerty, K.; Magill, P.J.; Parkkinen, L.; Cragg, S.J. Rapid Modulation of Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons and Dopamine Release by Satellite Astrocytes. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Khakh, B.S.; McCarthy, K.D. Astrocyte Calcium Signaling: From Observations to Functions and the Challenges Therein. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a020404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bindocci, E.; Savtchouk, I.; Liaudet, N.; Becker, D.; Carriero, G.; Volterra, A. Three-Dimensional Ca2+ Imaging Advances Understanding of Astrocyte Biology. Science 2017, 356, eaai8185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Miyazaki, K.; Ross, W.N. Fast Synaptically Activated Calcium and Sodium Kinetics in Hippocampal Pyramidal Neuron Dendritic Spines. eNeuro 2022, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ozawa, K.; Nagao, M.; Konno, A.; Iwai, Y.; Vittani, M.; Kusk, P.; Mishima, T.; Hirai, H.; Nedergaard, M.; Hirase, H. Astrocytic GPCR-Induced Ca2+ Signaling Is Not Causally Related to Local Cerebral Blood Flow Changes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yoshida, E.; Terada, S.-I.; Tanaka, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Ohkura, M.; Nakai, J.; Matsuzaki, M. In Vivo Wide-Field Calcium Imaging of Mouse Thalamocortical Synapses with an 8 K Ultra-High-Definition Camera. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Walters, M.C.; Sonner, M.; Myers, J.H.; Ladle, D.R. Calcium Imaging of Parvalbumin Neurons in the Dorsal Root Ganglia. eNeuro 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Umpierre, A.D.; Bystrom, L.; Ying, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, L. Microglial Calcium Signaling Is Attuned to Neuronal Activity. bioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Durbin, R.J.; Heredia, D.J.; Gould, T.W.; Renden, R. Postsynaptic Calcium Extrusion at the Mouse Neuromuscular Junction Alkalinizes the Synaptic Cleft. J. Neurosci. 2023, 43, 5741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bazargani, N.; Attwell, D. Astrocyte Calcium Signaling: The Third Wave. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gerasimov, E.; Erofeev, A.; Borodinova, A.; Bolshakova, A.; Balaban, P.; Bezprozvanny, I.; Vlasova, O.L. Optogenetic Activation of Astrocytes—Effects on Neuronal Network Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, A.; Zhang, J.; Lun, W.-Z.; Geng, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wu, J.; Chen, G. Dynamic Changes of Media Prefrontal Cortex Astrocytic Activity in Response to Negative Stimuli in Male Mice. Neurobiol. Stress 2024, 33, 100676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lefton, K.B.; Wu, Y.; Dai, Y.; Okuda, T.; Zhang, Y.; Yen, A.; Rurak, G.M.; Walsh, S.; Manno, R.; Myagmar, B.; et al. Norepinephrine Signals through Astrocytes to Modulate Synapses. Science 2025, 388, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Giudice, M.L.; Mihalik, B.; Dinnyés, A.; Kobolák, J. The Nervous System Relevance of the Calcium Sensing Receptor in Health and Disease. Molecules 2019, 24, 2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Brennan, S.; Mun, H.; Delbridge, L.; Kuchel, P.W.; Conigrave, A.D. Temperature Sensing by the Calcium-Sensing Receptor. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1117352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, H.; Lu, Y. High Calcium Concentrations Reduce Cellular Excitability of Mouse MNTB Neurons. Brain Res. 2023, 1820, 148568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sundararaman, S.S.; van der Vorst, E.P.C. Calcium-Sensing Receptor (CaSR), Its Impact on Inflammation and the Consequences on Cardiovascular Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gorkhali, R.; Li, T.; Dong, B.; Bagchi, P.; Deng, X.; Pawar, S.; Duong, D.M.; Fang, N.; Seyfried, N.T.; Yang, J.J. Extracellular Calcium Alters Calcium-Sensing Receptor Network Integrating Intracellular Calcium-Signaling and Related Key Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Elliott, E.R.; Cooper, R.L. The Effect of Calcium Ions on Resting Membrane Potential. Biology 2024, 13, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kang, Y.; Wu, J.-X.; Chen, L. Structure of Voltage-Modulated Sodium-Selective NALCN-FAM155A Channel Complex. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, D.; Wei, Y. Role of Sodium Leak Channel (NALCN) in Sensation and Pain: An Overview. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 14, 1349438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Octeau, J.C.; Gangwani, M.R.; Allam, S.L.; Tran, D.; Huang, S.; Hoang-Trong, T.M.; Golshani, P.; Rumbell, T.; Kozloski, J.; Khakh, B.S. Transient, Consequential Increases in Extracellular Potassium Ions Accompany Channelrhodopsin2 Excitation. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Čepkenović, B.; Friedland, F.; Noetzel, E.; Maybeck, V.; Offenhäusser, A. Single-Neuron Mechanical Perturbation Evokes Calcium Plateaus That Excite and Modulate the Network. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Durkee, C.A.; Araque, A. Diversity and Specificity of Astrocyte–Neuron Communication. Neuroscience 2019, 396, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Refaeli, R.; Doron, A.; Benmelech-Chovav, A.; Groysman, M.; Kreisel, T.; Loewenstein, Y.; Goshen, I. Features of Hippocampal Astrocytic Domains and Their Spatial Relation to Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons. Glia 2021, 69, 2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stobart, J.L.; Ferrari, K.D.; Barrett, M.; Glück, C.; Stobart, M.; Zuend, M.; Weber, B. Cortical Circuit Activity Evokes Rapid Astrocyte Calcium Signals on a Similar Timescale to Neurons. Neuron 2018, 98, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baravalle, R.; Canavier, C.C. Synchrony in Networks of Type 2 Interneurons Is More Robust to Noise with Hyperpolarizing Inhibition Compared to Shunting Inhibition in Both the Stochastic Population Oscillator and the Coupled Oscillator Regimes. eNeuro 2024, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Navarrete, M.; Cuartero, M.I.; Palenzuela, R.; Draffin, J.E.; Konomi, A.; Serra, I.; Colié, S.; Castaño-Castaño, S.; Hasan, M.T.; Nebreda, Á.R.; et al. Astrocytic P38α MAPK Drives NMDA Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Depression and Modulates Long-Term Memory. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lalo, U.; Pankratov, Y. Role for Astrocytes in mGluR-Dependent LTD in the Neocortex and Hippocampus. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bohmbach, K.; Henneberger, C. Activity-Induced Reactivity of Astrocytes Impairs Cognition. PLoS Biol. 2024, 22, e3002712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ruffini, G.; Salvador, R.; Tadayon, E.; Sanchez-Todo, R.; Pascual-Leone, Á.; Santarnecchi, E. Realistic Modeling of Mesoscopic Ephaptic Coupling in the Human Brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2020, 16, e1007923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shivacharan, R.S.; Chiang, C.; Wei, X.; Subramanian, M.; Couturier, N.H.; Pakalapati, N.; Durand, D.M. Neural Recruitment by Ephaptic Coupling in Epilepsy. Epilepsia 2021, 62, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cunha, G.M.; de Sousa, M.P.B.; Corso, G.; dos Santos Lima, G.Z. How Ephapticity Can Explain Brain Complexity? Res. Sq. 2023. [CrossRef]
  77. Cunha, G.M.; Corso, G.; de Sousa, M.P.B.; dos Santos Lima, G.Z. Can Ephapticity Contributes to the Brain Complexity? PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0310640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. de Sousa, M.P.B.; Cunha, G.M.; Corso, G.; dos Santos Lima, G.Z. Thermal Effects and Ephaptic Entrainment in Hodgkin–Huxley Model. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Anastassiou, C.A.; Koch, C. Ephaptic Coupling to Endogenous Electric Field Activity: Why Bother? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2015, 31, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Y.; Tsang, T.K.; Bushong, E.A.; Chu, L.; Chiang, A.; Ellisman, M.H.; Reingruber, J.; Su, C. Asymmetric Ephaptic Inhibition between Compartmentalized Olfactory Receptor Neurons. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Manninen, T.; Saudargienė, A.; Linne, M. Astrocyte-Mediated Spike-Timing-Dependent Long-Term Depression Modulates Synaptic Properties in the Developing Cortex. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2020, 16, e1008360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Verhoog, Q.P.; Holtman, L.; Aronica, E.; van Vliet, E.A. Astrocytes as Guardians of Neuronal Excitability: Mechanisms Underlying Epileptogenesis. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 591690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hyung, S.; Park, J.; Jung, K. Application of Optogenetic Glial Cells to Neuron–Glial Communication. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1249043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Eitelmann, S.; Everaerts, K.; Petersilie, L.; Rose, C.R.; Stephan, J. Ca2+-Dependent Rapid Uncoupling of Astrocytes upon Brief Metabolic Stress. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1151608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lines, J.; Corkrum, M.; Aguilar, J.; Araque, A. The Duality of Astrocyte Neuromodulation: Astrocytes Sense Neuromodulators and Are Neuromodulators. J. Neurochem. 2025, 169, e70054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Robertson, J. The Astroglia Syncytial Theory of Consciousness. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pinotsis, D.A.; Miller, E.K. In Vivo Ephaptic Coupling Allows Memory Network Formation. Cereb. Cortex 2023, 33, 9877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shah, D.; Gsell, W.; Wahis, J.; Luckett, E.S.; Jamoulle, T.; Vermaercke, B.; Preman, P.; Moechars, D.; Hendrickx, V.; Jaspers, T.; et al. Astrocyte Calcium Dysfunction Causes Early Network Hyperactivity in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Rep. 2022, 40, 111280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Madeira, D.; Domingues, J.; Lopes, C.R.; Canas, P.M.; Cunha, R.A.; Agostinho, P. Modification of Astrocytic Cx43 Hemichannel Activity in Animal Models of AD: Modulation by Adenosine A2A Receptors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2023, 80, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Cheli, V.T.; González, D.A.S.; Smith, J.; Spreuer, V.; Murphy, G.G.; Paez, P.M. L-type Voltage—Operated Calcium Channels Contribute to Astrocyte Activation In Vitro. Glia 2016, 64, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Donato, R.; Cannon, B.R.; Sorci, G.; Riuzzi, F.; Hsu, K.; Weber, D.J.; Geczy, C.L. Functions of S100 Proteins. Curr. Mol. Med. 2012, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Barres, B.A. The Mystery and Magic of Glia: A Perspective on Their Roles in Health and Disease. Neuron 2008, 60, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Delekate, A.; Füchtemeier, M.; Schumacher, T.; Ulbrich, C.; Foddis, M.; Petzold, G.C. Metabotropic P2Y1 Receptor Signalling Mediates Astrocytic Hyperactivity in Vivo in an Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Model. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Volterra, A.; Meldolesi, J. Astrocytes, from Brain Glue to Communication Elements: The Revolution Continues. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Guan, P.; Cao, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P. Calcium Ions Aggravate Alzheimer’s Disease Through the Aberrant Activation of Neuronal Networks, Leading to Synaptic and Cognitive Deficits. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 757515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Webber, E.K.; Fivaz, M.; Stutzmann, G.E.; Griffioen, G. Cytosolic Calcium: Judge, Jury and Executioner of Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s Disease and Beyond. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023, 19, 3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Baraibar, A.M.; Colomer, T.; Moreno-García, A.; Bernal-Chico, A.; Sánchez-Martín, E.; Utrilla, C.; Serrat, R.; Soria-Gómez, E.; Rodríguez-Antigüedad, A.; Araque, A.; et al. Autoimmune Inflammation Triggers Aberrant Astrocytic Calcium Signaling to Impair Synaptic Plasticity. Brain Behav. Immun. 2024, 121, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fan, Y.; Han, J.; Zhao, L.; Wu, C.; Wu, P.; Huang, Z.; Hao, X.; Ji, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhu, M. Experimental Models of Cognitive Impairment for Use in Parkinson’s Disease Research: The Distance Between Reality and Ideal. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 745438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bancroft, E.A.; Srinivasan, R. Emerging Roles for Aberrant Astrocytic Calcium Signals in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Physiol. 2022, 12, 812212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Xu, J.; Minobe, E.; Kameyama, M. Ca2+ Dyshomeostasis Links Risk Factors to Neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 867385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Prunell, G.; Olivera-Bravo, S. A Focus on Astrocyte Contribution to Parkinson’s Disease Etiology. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Vrapciu, A.D.; Rusu, M.C.; Jianu, A.M.; Motoc, A.G.M.; Nicolescu, M.I. Astrocytes—Friends or Foes in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2023, 64, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Lozovaya, N.A.; Eftekhari, S.; Cloarec, R.; Gouty-Colomer, L.; Dufour, A.; Riffault, B.; Billon-Grand, M.; Pons-Bennaceur, A.; Oumar, N.; Burnashev, N.; et al. GABAergic Inhibition in Dual-Transmission Cholinergic and GABAergic Striatal Interneurons Is Abolished in Parkinson Disease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, J.; Shen, Q.; Ma, Y.; Liu, L.; Jia, W.; Chen, L.; Xie, J. Calcium Homeostasis in Parkinson’s Disease: From Pathology to Treatment. Neurosci. Bull. 2022, 38, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Muwanigwa, M.N.; Modamio-Chamarro, J.; Antony, P.; Gomez-Giro, G.; Krüger, R.; Bolognin, S.; Schwamborn, J.C. Alpha-Synuclein Pathology Is Associated with Astrocyte Senescence in a Midbrain Organoid Model of Familial Parkinson’s Disease. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2024, 128, 103919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hastings, N.; Rahman, S.M.J.; Stempor, P.; Wayland, M.T.; Kuan, W.; Kotter, M. Connexin 43 Is Downregulated in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease in Multiple Brain Regions Which Correlates with Symptoms. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 10250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mallet, N.; Leblois, A.; Maurice, N.; Beurrier, C. Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons: How to Elucidate Their Function in Health and Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Shigetomi, E.; Jackson-Weaver, O.; Huckstepp, R.T.; O’Dell, T.J.; Khakh, B.S. Cellular/Molecular TRPA1 Channels Are Regulators of Astrocyte Basal Calcium Levels and Long-Term Potentiation via Constitutive D-Serine Release. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 10143–10153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Charles, A.; Merrill, J.E.; Dirksen, E.R.; Sandersont, M.J. Intercellular Signaling in Glial Cells: Calcium Waves and Oscillations in Response to Mechanical Stimulation and Glutamate. Neuron 1991, 6, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zheng, S.; Zhang, X.-P.; Song, P.; Hu, Y.; Gong, X.; Peng, X. Complexity-Based Graph Convolutional Neural Network for Epilepsy Diagnosis in Normal, Acute, and Chronic Stages. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1211096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ding, S.; Fellin, T.; Zhu, Y.; Lee, S.-Y.; Auberson, Y.P.; Meaney, D.F.; Coulter, D.A.; Carmignoto, G.; Haydon, P.G. Neurobiology of Disease Enhanced Astrocytic Ca2 Signals Contribute to Neuronal Excitotoxicity after Status Epilepticus. J. Neurosci. 2007, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Morquette, P.; Verdier, D.; Kadala, A.; Féthière, J.; Philippe, A.; Robitaille, R.; Kolta, A. An Astrocyte-Dependent Mechanism for Neuronal Rhythmogenesis. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Agulhon, C.; Petravicz, J.; McMullen, A.B.; Sweger, E.J.; Minton, S.K.; Taves, S.; Casper, K.B.; Fiacco, T.A.; McCarthy, K.D. What Is the Role of Astrocyte Calcium in Neurophysiology? Neuron 2008, 59, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ji, Q.; Qie, X.; Ye, M. Dynamical Analysis of Astrocyte-Induced Neuronal Hyper-Excitation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2022, 111, 7713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Novakovic, M.; Korshunov, K.S.; Grant, R.A.; Martin, M.E.; Abdala-Valencia, H.; Budinger, G.R.S.; Radulović, J.; Prakriya, M. Astrocyte Reactivity and Inflammation-Induced Depression-like Behaviors Are Regulated by Orai1 Calcium Channels. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Georgiou, L.; Echeverría, A.; Georgiou, A.; Kühn, B. Ca2+ Activity Maps of Astrocytes Tagged by Axoastrocytic AAV Transfer. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabe5371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Griffioen, G. Calcium Dyshomeostasis Drives Pathophysiology and Neuronal Demise in Age-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lepore, A.C.; Rauck, B.; Dejea, C.M.; Pardo, A.C.; Rao, M.S.; Rothstein, J.D.; Maragakis, N.J. Focal Transplantation–Based Astrocyte Replacement Is Neuroprotective in a Model of Motor Neuron Disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Windrem, M.S.; Schanz, S.J.; Morrow, C.A.; Munir, J.; Chandler-Militello, D.; Wang, S.; Goldman, S.A. A Competitive Advantage by Neonatally Engrafted Human Glial Progenitors Yields Mice Whose Brains Are Chimeric for Human Glia. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 16153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ghuman, H.; Kim, K.S.; Barati, S.; Ganguly, K. Emergence of Task-Related Spatiotemporal Population Dynamics in Transplanted Neurons. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Davies, J.E.; Pröschel, C.; Zhang, N.; Noble, M.; Mayer-Pröschel, M.; Davies, S.J. Transplanted Astrocytes Derived from BMP- or CNTF-Treated Glial-Restricted Precursors Have Opposite Effects on Recovery and Allodynia after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Biol. 2008, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rose, C.R.; Verkhratsky, A. Principles of Sodium Homeostasis and Sodium Signalling in Astroglia. Glia 2016, 64, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Nicholson, C.; Hrabětová, S. Brain Extracellular Space: The Final Frontier of Neuroscience. Biophys. J. 2017, 113, 2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chen, T.; Wardill, T.J.; Sun, Y.; Pulver, S.R.; Renninger, S.L.; Baohan, A.; Schreiter, E.R.; Kerr, R.; Orger, M.B.; Jayaraman, V.; et al. Ultrasensitive Fluorescent Proteins for Imaging Neuronal Activity. Nature 2013, 499, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Grynkiewicz, G.; Poenie, M.; Tsien, R.Y. A New Generation of Ca2+ Indicators with Greatly Improved Fluorescence Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kim, J.W.; Yong, A.J.H.; Aisenberg, E.E.; Lobel, J.H.; Wang, W.; Dawson, T.M.; Dawson, V.L.; Gao, R.; Jan, Y.N.; Bateup, H.S.; et al. Molecular Recording of Calcium Signals via Calcium-Dependent Proximity Labeling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2024, 20, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hara, Y.; Ichiraku, A.; Matsuda, T.; Sakane, A.; Sasaki, T.; Nagai, T.; Horikawa, K. High-Affinity Tuning of Single Fluorescent Protein-Type Indicators by Flexible Linker Length Optimization in Topology Mutant. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Farrants, H.; Shuai, Y.; Lemon, W.C.; Hernandez, C.M.; Zhang, D.; Yang, S.F.; Patel, R.; Qiao, G.; Frei, M.S.; Plutkis, S.E.; et al. A Modular Chemigenetic Calcium Indicator for Multiplexed in Vivo Functional Imaging. Nat. Methods 2024, 21, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Beier, H.T.; Tolstykh, G.P.; Musick, J.D.; Thomas, R.J.; Ibey, B.L. Plasma Membrane Nanoporation as a Possible Mechanism behind Infrared Excitation of Cells. J. Neural Eng. 2014, 11, 66006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bower, A.J.; Renteria, C.; Li, J.; Marjanovic, M.; Barkalifa, R.; Boppart, S.A. High-Speed Label-Free Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy of Metabolic Transients during Neuronal Activity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 081104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Kolenc, O.I.; Quinn, K.P. Evaluating Cell Metabolism Through Autofluorescence Imaging of NAD(P)H and FAD. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 30, 875–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zheng, K.; Bard, L.; Reynolds, J.P.; King, C.; Jensen, T.P.; Gourine, A.V.; Rusakov, D.A. Time-Resolved Imaging Reveals Heterogeneous Landscapes of Nanomolar Ca2+ in Neurons and Astroglia. Neuron 2015, 88, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nicholson, C.; Hrabětová, S. Biophysical Properties of Brain Extracellular Space Explored with Ion-Selective Microelectrodes, Integrative Optical Imaging and Related Techniques. In Frontiers in Neuroengineering Series/Frontiers in Neuroengineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; p. 167. [Google Scholar]
  134. Thorne, R.G.; Nicholson, C. In Vivo Diffusion Analysis with Quantum Dots and Dextrans Predicts the Width of Brain Extracellular Space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Egelman, D.M.; Montague, P.R. Calcium Dynamics in the Extracellular Space of Mammalian Neural Tissue. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Valiente-Gabioud, A.A.; Suñer, I.G.; Idziak, A.; Fabritius, A.; Basquin, J.; Angibaud, J.; Nägerl, U.V.; Singh, S.P.; Griesbeck, O. Fluorescent Sensors for Imaging of Interstitial Calcium. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sasaki, T.; Hisada, S.; Kanki, H.; Nunomura, K.; Lin, B.; Nishiyama, K.; Kawano, T.; Matsumura, S.; Mochizuki, H. Modulation of Ca2+ Oscillation Following Ischemia and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Primary Cortical Neurons by High-Throughput Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 27667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Dana, H.; Sun, Y.; Mohar, B.; Hulse, B.K.; Kerlin, A.; Hasseman, J.; Tsegaye, G.; Tsang, A.; Wong, A.M.; Patel, R.; et al. High-Performance Calcium Sensors for Imaging Activity in Neuronal Populations and Microcompartments. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yasuda, R.; Nimchinsky, E.A.; Scheuß, V.; Pologruto, T.A.; Oertner, T.G.; Sabatini, B.L.; Svoboda, K. Imaging Calcium Concentration Dynamics in Small Neuronal Compartments. Sci. STKE 2004, 2004, pl5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Sabatini, B.L.; Oertner, T.G.; Svoboda, K. The Life Cycle of Ca2+ Ions in Dendritic Spines. Neuron 2002, 33, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Somjen, G.G. Ions in the Brain: Normal Function, Seizures, and Stroke; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004; Volume 11, p. 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Rusakov, D.A.; Fine, A. Extracellular Ca2+ Depletion Contributes to Fast Activity-Dependent Modulation of Synaptic Transmission in the Brain. Neuron 2003, 37, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Qin, H.; He, W.; Yang, C.; Li, J.; Jian, T.; Liang, S.; Chen, T.; Feng, H.; Chen, X.; Liao, X.; et al. Monitoring Astrocytic Ca2+ Activity in Freely Behaving Mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 603095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kim, T.H.; Schnitzer, M.J. Fluorescence Imaging of Large-Scale Neural Ensemble Dynamics. Cell 2022, 185, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Das, A.; Holden, S.; Borovicka, J.; Icardi, J.; O’Niel, A.; Chaklai, A.; Patel, D.; Patel, R.; Kaech, S.; Raber, J.; et al. Large-Scale Recording of Neuronal Activity in Freely-Moving Mice at Cellular Resolution. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Gezginer, I.; Ding, Q.-P.; Yoshihara, H.A.I.; Deán-Ben, X.L.; Ni, R.; Razansky, D. Non-Invasive Large-Scale Imaging of Concurrent Neuronal, Astrocytic, and Hemodynamic Activity with Hybrid Multiplexed Fluorescence and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (HyFMRI). Light Sci. Appl. 2025, 14, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Srikanth, S.; Narayanan, R. Heterogeneous Off-Target Impact of Ion-Channel Deletion on Intrinsic Properties of Hippocampal Model Neurons That Self-Regulate Calcium. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1241450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Rondoni, N.A.; Lu, F.; Turner-Evans, D.B.; Gomez, M. Predicting Neuronal Firing from Calcium Imaging Using a Control Theoretic Approach. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2025, 21, e1012603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Carbonero, D.; Noueihed, J.; Kramer, M.; White, J.A. Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Analyzing State Dependent Neuronal Network Dynamics in Calcium Recordings. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 27899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Toma, J.S.; Karamboulas, K.; Carr, M.; Kolaj, A.; Yuzwa, S.A.; Mahmud, N.; Storer, M.A.; Kaplan, D.R.; Miller, F.D. Peripheral Nerve Single-Cell Analysis Identifies Mesenchymal Ligands That Promote Axonal Growth. eNeuro 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Moldwin, T.; Azran, L.S.; Segev, I. The Calcitron: A Simple Neuron Model That Implements Many Learning Rules via the Calcium Control Hypothesis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2025, 21, e1012754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Moldwin, T.; Azran, L.S.; Segev, I. A Generalized Mathematical Framework for the Calcium Control Hypothesis Describes Weight-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2025, 53, 333–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Cahill, M.K.; Collard, M.; Tse, V.; Reitman, M.E.; Etchenique, R.; Kirst, C.; Poskanzer, K.E. Network-Level Encoding of Local Neurotransmitters in Cortical Astrocytes. Nature 2024, 629, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Gong, L.; Pasqualetti, F.; Papouin, T.; Ching, S. Astrocytes as a Mechanism for Contextually-Guided Network Dynamics and Function. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2024, 20, e1012186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Neuronal mechanisms of sensitivity to extracellular calcium ([Ca2+]o).
Figure 1. Neuronal mechanisms of sensitivity to extracellular calcium ([Ca2+]o).
Cells 14 01709 g001
Table 1. Intracellular mechanisms of astrocytic Ca2+ signaling.
Table 1. Intracellular mechanisms of astrocytic Ca2+ signaling.
Mechanism/SourceMode of ActivationFunctional OutputReferences
IP3R (Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors)G-protein-coupled receptor activation → phospholipase C → IP3 production → ER Ca2+ releaseGliotransmitter release (glutamate, ATP, GABA, D-serine), metabolic coupling[4,6,9,13,14]
SOCE (Store-operated calcium entry)ER Ca2+ depletion → STIM sensor activation → Orai channel opening at ER-plasma membrane junctionsER Ca2+ store replenishment, sustained Ca2+ signaling[6,9,13]
mGluR (Metabotropic glutamate receptors)Glutamate binding → phospholipase C activation → IP3-mediated Ca2+ mobilizationGliotransmission, synaptic modulation[4,8,9,12]
P2Y (Purinergic P2Y receptors)ATP/ADP binding → phospholipase C activation → IP3-mediated Ca2+ mobilizationGliotransmission, intercellular Ca2+ wave propagation[4,9,13,14]
VGCC (Voltage-gated calcium channels)Membrane depolarization → channel opening → Ca2+ influxLocalized Ca2+ entry, depolarization-linked responses[5,9,13,14]
NCX (Na+-Ca2+ exchanger)Reverse mode operation during elevated intracellular Na+ (e.g., after neurotransmitter uptake)Ca2+ entry independent of ER stores, contribution to ionic homeostasis (with Na+,K+-ATPase)[7,9,13]
Ionotropic receptorsLigand binding (e.g., AMPA, NMDA, P2X) → direct Ca2+ influxMicrodomain signaling in fine processes[4,9,13,14]
Table 2. Extracellular calcium signaling mechanisms and neuronal targets.
Table 2. Extracellular calcium signaling mechanisms and neuronal targets.
Neuronal TargetMechanism of Sensitivity to [Ca2+]oFunctional OutcomeReferences
CaSR (Calcium-sensing receptor)G-protein-coupled receptor activation by extracellular Ca2+ → intracellular cascades regulating ion channels, neurotransmitter release, and gene expressionCoupling of extracellular calcium availability to neuronal physiology[39,57,60,61]
HCN channels (Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated)Surface charge screening by Ca2+ ions → shielding of negative membrane charges → shifted voltage dependenceAltered pacemaker currents and excitability[59,62]
SK/BK channels (Small/large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels)Indirect modulation through [Ca2+]o effects on local depolarization and intracellular Ca2+ entryModulation of afterhyperpolarization and firing patterns[47,59,62]
NALCN (Sodium leak channel)Proposed response to [Ca2+]o changes through mechanisms involving auxiliary subunitsAltered baseline excitability and membrane potential[27,63,64]
Voltage-gated Na+/K+ channelsScreening of fixed negative charges by divalent Ca2+ alters gating of fast voltage-gated channelsDepolarized neuronal thresholds, increased excitability (with [Ca2+]o reduction)[59,62,65]
NMDA receptorsDirect modulation by extracellular Ca2+ availability affecting receptor activityAltered synaptic plasticity induction (LTP/LTD)[30,47,66]
Presynaptic Ca2+ channels[Ca2+]o changes alter driving force for Ca2+ entry during action potentialsModified neurotransmitter release probability and short-term plasticity[47,52,59]
Table 3. Pathological alterations in astrocytic Ca2+ signaling.
Table 3. Pathological alterations in astrocytic Ca2+ signaling.
DisorderAstrocytic Ca2+ AbnormalityConsequences for Neurons/NetworksTranslational ImplicationsRefs.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)Abnormal intracellular Ca2+ oscillations; exaggerated Ca2+ transients; impaired extracellular Ca2+ buffering (due to amyloid-β effects on receptors/channels) Destabilized gliotransmission; synaptic and cognitive declineExcitotoxic cascades; impaired amyloid clearance via disrupted Ca2+-dependent endocytosis; self-reinforcing pathological cycle[88,89,93,95,96]
Parkinson’s disease (PD)Disrupted astrocytic Ca2+ handling in striatum (due to α-synuclein accumulation); weakened ability to maintain ionic stability particularly affecting astrocyte-cholinergic interneuron interactionsAltered balance between dopaminergic and cholinergic signaling; compromised striatal circuit functionMotor dysfunction and cognitive decline; selective vulnerability of striatal cholinergic interneurons[99,100,101,103,104,105,106,107]
EpilepsyRapid [Ca2+]o drops during seizures; impaired astrocytic Ca2+ buffering; aberrant Ca2+ oscillationsCompromised ionic homeostasis restoration; prolonged hyperexcitability; facilitated recurrent ictal activityLowered seizure thresholds; network instability driven by astrocytic dysfunction; potential therapeutic target for stabilizing [Ca2+]o and restoring excitability balance[35,82,110,111,114]
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD)Immature astrocytic Ca2+ signaling profiles (due to failed astrocyte maturation)Impaired synapse formation, pruning, and plasticity; altered circuit wiringSynaptic maturation deficits leading to atypical circuit development and behavioral phenotypes[36,67,68,83]
Intellectual disabilities (ID)Mutations in Ca2+-handling proteins (IP3 receptors, STIM/Orai components, exchangers); disrupted intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and extracellular modulationImpaired astrocytic support to neuronal networks; long-lasting deficits in synaptic connectivityCognitive dysfunction resulting in persistent impairments in learning and memory functions[6,28,115]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nowacka, A.; Śniegocki, M.; Ziółkowska, E.A. Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling. Cells 2025, 14, 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14211709

AMA Style

Nowacka A, Śniegocki M, Ziółkowska EA. Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling. Cells. 2025; 14(21):1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14211709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nowacka, Agnieszka, Maciej Śniegocki, and Ewa A. Ziółkowska. 2025. "Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling" Cells 14, no. 21: 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14211709

APA Style

Nowacka, A., Śniegocki, M., & Ziółkowska, E. A. (2025). Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling. Cells, 14(21), 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14211709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop