Next Article in Journal
Progesterone Receptor Signaling in the Uterus Is Essential for Pregnancy Success
Next Article in Special Issue
Regulation of Oxidative Phosphorylation of Liver Mitochondria in Sepsis
Previous Article in Journal
β-Arrestin2 Is Critically Involved in the Differential Regulation of Phosphosignaling Pathways by Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone and Taltirelin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ca2+ Transportome and the Interorganelle Communication in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
 
 
Due to planned maintenance work on our platforms, there might be short service disruptions on Saturday, December 3rd, between 15:00 and 16:00 (CET).
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mitochondria and the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

1
Department of Cell Death and Proliferation, Institute of Biomedical Research of Barcelona (IIBB), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
2
Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
3
Center for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases (CIBERehd), Carlos III National Institute of Health, 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(9), 1475; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091475
Received: 19 March 2022 / Revised: 18 April 2022 / Accepted: 25 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitochondria in Liver Pathobiology)

Abstract

:
Alcoholic (ASH) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are advanced stages of fatty liver disease and two of the most prevalent forms of chronic liver disease. ASH and NASH are associated with significant risk of further progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver cancer, and a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite extensive research and progress in the last decades to elucidate the mechanisms of the development of ASH and NASH, the pathogenesis of both diseases is still poorly understood. Mitochondrial damage and activation of inflammasome complexes have a role in inducing and sustaining liver damage. Mitochondrial dysfunction produces inflammatory factors that activate the inflammasome complexes. NLRP3 inflammasome (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor protein 3) is a multiprotein complex that activates caspase 1 and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18), and contributes to inflammatory pyroptotic cell death. The present review, which is part of the issue “Mitochondria in Liver Pathobiology”, provides an overview of the role of mitochondrial dysfunction and NLRP3 activation in ASH and NASH.

1. Introduction

Alcoholic (ASH) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are two of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. ASH is caused by chronic alcohol consumption, while NASH is associated with dietary habits and obesity and linked to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes [1,2]. Although ASH and NASH differ in their etiology, both pathologies are characterized by the excess of fat deposition and lipotoxicity leading to inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and fibrogenesis [3,4]. Despite significant advances in the identification of players mediating the transition from steatosis to steatohepatitis, unfortunately the therapeutic options for ASH and NASH are limited, due to our incomplete understanding of the molecular mechanisms contributing to ASH and NASH development.
Mitochondria are the power plants of the cell responsible not only for the generation of cellular energy required for myriad functions but also are important hubs for metabolism, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and Ca2+ homeostasis. Associated with the role of energy production, mitochondria consume large amounts of molecular oxygen in the respiratory chain and, hence, are critical players in the onset of oxidative stress, which is accentuated by the disturbance of mitochondrial function related to hepatocyte injury in ASH and NASH [5]. As oxidative stress reflects the imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants defense, the impairment in the levels and/or activity of mitochondrial antioxidant strategies, including disruption of the GSH redox cycle, enhances the accumulation of ROS and increases the susceptibility of the cells to inflammatory cytokines [6].
Furthermore, mitochondrial dysfunction can activate the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, leading to inflammation [7]. Inflammasomes are multiprotein immune complexes that are activated in response to pathogen-associated and danger-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs), such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and cholesterol crystals [8]. The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome followed by caspase-1 activation allows the release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-18, into the extracellular space that promote inflammatory cell death (pyroptosis), leading to an increase in liver inflammation, steatosis, and fibrosis [9].
In this review, we discuss the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of ASH and NASH and its interplay with the activated NLRP3.

Overview of Mitochondria and NLRP3 Inflammasome Interplay

Inflammasomes are a group of intracellular multicomplexes located in the cytosol which detect PAMPs and DAMPs and produce the activation, maturation, and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (including IL-1β and IL-18) [10,11].
Among the family of inflammasomes, the best characterized are NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRC4, and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) [12]. NLRP3, the best-studied member of the inflammasome family, is a multicomplex formed by NLRP3, adaptor apoptosis speck protein (ASC), and pro-caspase-1 [13].
Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome can occur through two signal steps [8,14]. The priming signal is provided by microbial components (LPS) or endogenous cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNF-α; IL-1β), followed by the binding to toll-like receptors (such as TLR4), leading to the activation of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), which in turn contributes to the transcription and translation of NLRP3. Then, NLRP3 undergoes post-translational modifications, resulting in its activation.
The activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome leads to the subsequent activation of caspase 1, which can then cleave inactive pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into active IL-1β and IL-18, respectively. The activation of caspase-1 also cleaves gasdermin D (GSDMD) into a N-terminal fragment, which transfers to the cell membrane for specific interactions with lipids. Cells undergo morphological changes, including plasma membrane rupture and pore formation, loss of ionic gradients, and osmosis resulting in cellular swelling due to water entry, and are finally lysed, causing the release of intracellular pro-inflammatory molecules (IL-1β and IL-18), which subsequently stimulate secondary cytokine production [15].
The signals for the inflammasome activation include extracellular stimuli such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), pore-forming toxins, RNA viruses, cholesterol crystals, uric acid, and amyloid β [8,14]. There are three hypotheses regarding the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome: (a) the destabilization of the ion outflow (K+, Ca2+, and H+), creating holes in the cell membrane; (b) the release of ROS by damaged mitochondria; and (c) the rupture of lysosomes that produce the leak of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin B [8]. Mitochondria are the main source of ROS (mtROS) (Figure 1).
Mitochondria are intracellular organelles with a double membrane that delimits the intermembrane space and the mitochondrial matrix. Both spaces have different and important functions for the cellular metabolism and homeostasis. In the soluble matrix, importantly, metabolic processes, such as the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), fatty acid oxidation, and urea synthesis, take place [16].
Mitochondria are the main consumers of molecular oxygen in the cell in the respiratory chain, localized in the inner membrane and composed by the complexes I, II, III, and IV, cytochrome c, and coenzyme Q [16]. The mitochondrial respiratory chain is involved in the generation of ATP and in the homeostasis of ROS. Increased metabolic rates, hypoxia, or membrane damage are stress inducers of mitochondrial ROS production [17].
Excessive electron flow to the respiratory chain results in an enhanced generation of superoxide anion, hydroxyl radicals, and hydrogen peroxide. These free radicals and other oxidants are metabolized in mitochondria by the existence of efficient antioxidant strategy systems, comprised of several enzymes, such as superoxide dismutases (SODs), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and reductase (GSSG-Rx), and peroxiredoxins/thioredoxins, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants (vitamin A/C/E and GSH) [18,19,20]. GSH is particularly crucial, as it is part—along with GSH-Px and GSH-Rx—of the GSH redox cycle that detoxifies hydrogen peroxide and other lipid peroxides. When the production of ROS exceeds the capacity of these antioxidant defenses, or if an antioxidant balance is not ensured, free radicals and ROS can accumulate, with the risk of damaging mitochondrial components, such as the mtDNA [21].
Oxidized mitochondrial DNA (ox-mtDNA) is released to the cytosol, where it can directly bind NLRP3 inflammasome, triggering its activation [22]. Furthermore, cardiolipin, a mitochondria-specific phospholipid, translocates from the inner to the outer mitochondrial membrane and produces the oligomerization and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM) [23]. MAMs are specific sites where mitochondria and ER contact and are believed to play a critical role in the transfer of lipids and Ca2+ between ER and mitochondria [24]. Importantly, as mitochondria have been shown to co-localize with the NLRP3 [7], mitochondria dysfunction stands as an important factor that facilitates the assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome [25].
In line with the link between mitochondria and NLRP3, Zhou et al. showed that the inhibition of complex I or III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain causes unprompted NLRP3 inflammasome activation [7]. Additional findings showed that the inhibition of mitophagy/autophagy results in the prolonged generation of ROS from damaged mitochondria, a process in which the sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1, also called p62) plays an essential role in ensuring mitochondrial quality control via mitophagy [26].
Besides the quantitative generation of ROS by mitochondria in the respiratory chain, there are other sources of ROS generation, including the β-oxidation pathways of mitochondria and peroxisomes, as well as the cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) in the ER [27]. The link between the extramitochondrial generation of ROS and NLRP3 activation remains to be further established.
Nevertheless, the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome has been implicated as a crucial factor in the development of different pathologies, such as metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis, and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as inflammatory diseases, including ASH and NASH [28]. However, the exact link between mitochondrial dysfunction and its relationship with NLRP3 is not completely understood and requires further investigation. In the present review, we summarize current evidence supporting a role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its impact in ASH and NASH (Figure 2).

2. Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (ASH)

2.1. Epidemiology and Etiology

The public health impact of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is growing and remains a major cause of liver-related mortality worldwide, with around three million estimated deaths per year. In Europe and the United States, ALD is one of the most prevalent forms of liver disease [29]. The amount of alcohol consumed is directly related with the risk of ALD [30]. The disease is caused by the chronic consumption of alcohol with a certain daily amount of about 40 to 80 g of ethanol per day for men and 20 to 40 g per day for women for a minimum of 10 to 12 years [31]. The proportion of global deaths attributable to alcohol consumption, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), is 7.6% in men and 4.0% in women. However, the natural course of ALD may be affected by other various factors, not only by drinking patterns, such as obesity, genetic variants, diet, and co-medication [32].

2.2. Progression and Stages

The spectrum of ALD includes from simple alcoholic steatosis to steatohepatitis (ASH), alcoholic hepatitis (AH), and cirrhosis [33]. Between 90 and 100% of the individuals that consume more than 40 g of alcohol daily end up developing alcoholic fatty liver. A percentage of about 10–35% of these individuals develop ASH, which reflects a severe inflammatory state of the liver characterized by specific histological features, such as presence of fat, ballooning of hepatocytes, infiltration of neutrophils, and/or liver fibrosis [32]. Once cirrhosis is established, in around 8–20% of the ASH patients, the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma increases ~2% per year [34]. The factors involved in the pathophysiology of ASH are hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, acetaldehyde-mediated toxicity, cytokine- and chemokine-induced inflammation, and the onset of pyroptosis [32].

2.3. Pathogenesis

Ethanol is metabolized in hepatocytes by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and the resulting generation of acetaldehyde is further metabolized to acetate by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) [35]. Besides ADH, ethanol is also metabolized by CYP2E1, which consumes molecular oxygen for the oxidation of ethanol into acetaldehyde and causes a subsequent generation of free radicals and ROS as byproducts, such as ethoxy radical, hydroxyethyl radical, acetyl radical, singlet radical, superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, alkoxyl radical, and peroxyl radical [36]. Alcohol-generated ROS initiates a cascade of deleterious events that produce oxidative stress and inflammation. Alcohol disrupts hepatic lipid metabolism, producing lipid peroxidation products, such as 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) or malondialdehyde (MDA), and modifies the intestinal microbiome, causing the release of endotoxins (LPS) and other PAMPs that may further contribute to alcoholic liver disease [32,37].
Sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP1c) and peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor-α (PPARα) are two key lipogenic transcription factors implicated in the development of fatty liver following chronic alcohol consumption [38]. Various factors, for example, acetaldehyde, LPS, PAMPs, and ER stress, induce the upregulation of SREBP1c and other lipogenic genes and activate the fatty acid (FA) synthesis, leading to steatosis [39]. On the other hand, alcohol inhibits the β-oxidation of fatty acids due to the suppression of PPARα by different factors, such as the increment of acetaldehyde and the oxidized and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ratio (NADH/NAD+) or by the inhibition of adiponectin, 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and zinc levels [40,41]. In addition, alcohol ingestion produces an acetaldehyde-mediated depletion of mitochondrial GSH, leading to oxidative stress in hepatocytes, which impairs hepatocyte tolerance to TNF-α, resulting in increased cell death and organ damage [42].
ROS can also stimulate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), leading to extracellular matrix production, which results in fibrogenesis [43]. Beside hepatocytes and HSCs, other hepatic cells, such as Kupffer cells (KCs) and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, are also affected and release pro-inflammatory cytokines which stimulate the progression of ALD to cirrhosis and HCC [44].

3. ASH, Mitochondria, and Inflammasome

Hepatic inflammation is a characteristic feature of ASH and is a prerequisite for the development of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC. Unfortunately, there is no effective therapy, due to our incomplete understanding of the molecular events leading to ASH. In this regard, there is evidence in experimental animal models linking inflammasome activation and mitochondrial dysfunction as potential mechanisms involved in ASH.
The involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome in ALD has been demonstrated in several studies [45]. Alcohol produces a loss of the intestinal barrier integrity that allows the translocation of microbial products (endotoxins and saturated long-chain FA) to the circulation which may enter into the liver, inducing the activation of the inflammasome cascade (NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β).
Chronic alcohol consumption produces an increment in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients and in alcoholic experimental models. Other increased cytokines in serum of ASH in experimental models include TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. The latter is generated from the processing of pro-IL1β, which is induced via TLR4–NF-κB activation, the common pathway of priming NLRP3 inflammasome. IL-1β has been shown to upregulate fatty acid synthesis, contributing to the onset of hepatic steatosis. In this regard, it has been shown that Anakinra, a pharmacological inhibitor of IL-1β signaling, ameliorated alcohol-related liver injury and promoted the regeneration of hepatocytes in mice with alcoholic hepatitis [46].
Numerous studies have shown that ALD also produces an increment of uric acid and ATP levels, which can activate NLRP3 in KCs, the resident liver macrophages, leading to the activation of caspase-1. KCs present a 20-fold higher expression of inflammasome components than hepatocytes [47]. Deletion of the corresponding purinergic signaling through P2X7 receptor blocked ATP signaling and the recruitment of the NLRP3 inflammasome-caspase-1 complex in KCs, consistent with their role in the pathophysiology of ALD [48,49]. Moreover, KCs can also regulate HSC activation by cytokines and chemokines, thus contributing to the onset of fibrosis, an indicator of disease progression [50].
Evidence supporting a crucial role of NLRP3 activation in ALD includes the marked protection of mice with global knockout of caspase-1, ASC, and IL-1β receptor which exhibit alleviated steatosis and inflammation [51]. In addition, similar protection against liver injury and inflammation has been reported in mice with the specific deletion of caspase-1 in KCs, as well as in NLRP3 knockout mice following an acute-on-chronic alcohol feeding, which produced the upregulation of NLRP3, ASC, and IL-1β.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), such as miR-148a, are key contributors to liver disease progression. Recent evidence in experimental ALD models showed a decrease in miR148a expression in hepatocytes through FoxO1, a metabolic regulator and tumor suppressor in the liver, promoting the overexpression of the thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) and the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which in turn produced pyroptosis [52]. In this regard, using a hybrid feeding model in which western diet with intragastric ethanol administration synergized to develop ASH, Khanova et al. showed the upregulation of caspase-1 and GSDMD processing, suggesting a crucial role for pyroptosis in alcoholic hepatitis [53]. Altogether, these findings in mouse models and ALD patients point to a potential relevance of the activation of the inflammasome in the pathogenesis of ALD, emerging as a potential target for treatment which remains to be further investigated.
An additional link between alcohol metabolism and NLRP3 activation is likely mediated via mitochondrial dysfunction, as it is well known that the oxidative metabolism of alcohol targets mitochondria. Indeed, mitochondrial dysfunction is a hallmark and a cause of ALD, due in part to the onset of ROS generation and oxidative stress. Mitochondria not only contribute to the oxidative metabolism of alcohol, but they are also important targets of alcohol toxicity. For instance, during the initiation and progression of ALD, alcohol metabolism decreases mitochondria membrane potential (MMP), affects the electron mitochondrial respiratory chain, and increases ROS generation, which targets mtDNA, resulting in oxidized mtDNA fragments and deletions in both ALD patients and experimental models [54], and these deleterious effects of ethanol are initiated by its oxidative metabolism via ALDH and especially CYP2E1 [36,55,56,57,58]. Although CYP2E1 is mainly located in the endoplasmic reticulum, there is evidence for its presence in other subcellular compartments, such as mitochondria. CYP2E1 can favor lipid peroxidation of mitochondrial membranes and further alter the respiratory chain, leading to oxidative stress and cytotoxicity due to ROS production and subsequent NLRP3 activation [59,60,61]. To illustrate the relevance of CYP2E1-induced oxidative metabolism of alcohol in ALD progression, it has been shown that CYP2E1 deletion in mice protects against alcohol-induced steatosis and ameliorates liver injury, while knock-in mice expressing human CYP2E1 exhibited increased susceptibility towards ALD progression using the Lieber–DeCarli model, which translated to higher liver injury, oxidative stress, inflammation, and mild fibrosis compared to wild type mice [62]. To further support the role of CYP2E1 in NLRP3 activation in ALD, it has been shown that Ginsenoside Rg1 (G-Rg1), a hepatoprotective component of the medicinal plant (Panax ginseng) [63], which blocks the induction of CYP2E1, prevented the generation of ROS and mitochondrial damage, leading to an inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation [61]. Moreover, CYP2E1 emerged as a critical factor in mediating alcohol-induced liver hypoxia and HIF-1 stabilization, which is preferentially seen in the perivenous zone of the liver, as these effects were prevented in CYP2E1 knockout mice and potentiated in knock-in mice expressing human CYP2E1 [64]. Importantly, hypoxia and HIF-1 have been shown to mediate mitochondrial dysfunction [65,66], and, hence, it is conceivable that alcohol-induced mitochondrial dysfunction may be caused in part by HIF-1 stabilization via CYP2E1.
Moreover, mitophagy plays a critical role in ALD. Mitophagy consists in the removal of damaged mitochondria, which in turn can reduce ROS accumulation and the damaged mtDNA, thus emerging as a protective mechanism for ALD [58]. Among the proteins that regulate mitophagy, a recent study showed that AMPK can significantly reduce alcohol-induced liver injury via the upregulation of mitophagy [67]. Moreover, it is known that patients with ALD have structural abnormalities in hepatic mitochondria and that mitochondrial dynamics determine the progression of ALD. For instance, the presence of megamitochondria is usually associated with a milder form of the disease [68], while increased mitochondrial fragmentation has been shown to promote severe ALD, including alcoholic hepatitis [69,70], suggesting that the targeting of mitochondrial dynamics via Drp-1 may stand as a potential promising approach for ALD.
In addition to the mitochondrial abnormalities at the morphological level caused by alcohol, there are also other mitochondrial functional alterations that contribute to ALD, such as the stimulated synthesis and trafficking of cholesterol to mitochondria [71,72,73]. Extensive evidence supports a critical role of mitochondrial cholesterol-mediated regulation of mGSH. Thus, alcohol induces mGSH depletion, which determines hepatocellular susceptibility to TNFα, inflammation, and oxidative stress [16,42]. Interestingly, alcohol-induced mGSH depletion observed in wild type mice is markedly accentuated in knock-in mice overexpressing CYP2E1 [64]. In this regard, there has been evidence indicating that ER stress is an important mechanism leading to mitochondrial cholesterol accumulation and mGSH depletion [74,75]. Cholesterol trafficking to mitochondrial membranes is causally mediated by the mitochondrial cholesterol transporter StARD1, which is causally linked to the mitochondrial alterations of membrane physical properties, underlying in part the mitochondrial dysfunction characteristic of ALD [16,74,75,76,77]. Besides the effect of cholesterol increased by alcohol feeding, ethanol exposure can induce mitochondrial ROS generation by other mechanisms, including inhibition of mitochondrial β-oxidation by blunting the induction of β-oxidation genes (PPARα), reduction of carnitine β-oxidation cofactor, or induction of the voltage-dependent anion-selective channel (VDAC) closure in mitochondrial membrane [5,78,79], which overall contribute to the increase of ROS generation in ALD. Therefore, a crosstalk between mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammasome activation induced by chronic ethanol consumption may contribute to the progression of ALD.

4. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

4.1. Epidemiology

According to the WHO, obesity is considered as the epidemic of the 21st century, since it affects more than 600 million people globally. Obesity is associated with liver disease and cardiovascular disorders, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, and degenerative disorders, including dementia [80]. One of the consequences of obesity is the so-called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD is a leading cause of chronic liver disease due to its association with obesity and type II diabetes. In Western countries, it affects around 30% of the population, and it is expected to increase due to the obesity and metabolic syndrome epidemic. Epidemiological data show that NAFLD is highly prevalent in all continents, with the highest rates in South America (31%) and the Middle East (32%), followed by Asia (27%), United States (24%), and Europe (23%), being less common in Africa (13%). NAFLD is expected to become the main cause of liver transplantation, and its prevalence can reach 90–95% in obese individuals [81,82,83].

4.2. Etiology

NAFLD is defined as the presence of more than 5% of fat in the liver (hepatic steatosis) despite the absence of significant alcohol consumption (less than 20 g/day) [84]. In the pathogenesis of NAFLD, insulin resistance (IR) is one of the primary mechanisms, as it affects both lipid metabolism and inflammatory processes. For instance, IR inhibits lipolysis in adipose tissue and stimulates de novo lipogenesis in the liver [85]. Apart from IR, the main risk factors for developing NAFLD are diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity. However, NAFLD is associated with other extrahepatic manifestations, such as hypertension, gut microbiota alterations, endocrine diseases, genetic predisposition (polymorphisms in PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 genes), sedentary lifestyle, and consumption of certain foods (e.g., fructose) [81,82,86]. For several years, the description of the NAFLD pathogenesis followed the “two hits” theory. This theory posits the existence of a first “hit” reflected by the intrahepatic accumulation of fatty acids due to IR, which sensitizes to “secondary hits” such as oxidative stress or mitochondrial dysfunction underlying liver injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. This initial view was reformulated by a novel theory to underlie NAFLD, the “multiple-parallel hits” [87], which considers a scenario where many factors act in parallel and in a synergic manner. The interaction between genetic, hormonal, and nutritional factors can lead to obesity and IR development, promoting accumulation of fat in the liver and adipose tissue dysfunction, which in turn induce secretion of adipokines and inflammatory cytokines [88]. Lastly, NAFLD development also involves mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress, oxidative stress, and production of ROS. All of these factors give rise to a chronic hepatic inflammatory state promoting the development and progression of NAFLD [81,86,89].

4.3. Progression and Stages

NAFLD comprises a wide spectrum of liver alterations, beginning from simple hepatic steatosis without evidence of hepatocellular injury (e.g., ballooning), called nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), to an advanced stage with inflammation and hepatocyte damage and typically accompanied with pericellular fibrosis, called nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Finally, the progression of NASH culminates in cirrhosis, liver failure, and final stage of HCC [86,90].
Recent studies determine that 5–20% of patients with NAFL develop NASH in their clinical course, of which 10–20% develop higher-grade fibrosis and <5% progress to cirrhosis. Between 18 and 33% of the cases with NAFLD have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and up to 66–83% of NAFLD cases have IR [82].
Despite recent progress regarding the pathogenesis of NAFLD, the denomination overestimates alcohol and underestimates the predisposing metabolic risk factors [91]. For these reasons, it has been proposed that the name of the disease should be changed from NAFLD to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), a new term that takes into account evidence of hepatic steatosis as well as overweight/obesity, presence of T2DM, or metabolic dysregulation [92].

5. NASH, Mitochondria, and Inflammasome

Although both ASH and NASH exhibit differential pathological characteristics, mitochondrial alterations stand as a common nexus (Table 1). In NAFL and especially in NASH, hepatic mitochondria are altered at the structural and molecular levels. Thus, a decline in mitochondrial function may disrupt metabolism and, hence, can contribute to the progression from NAFL to NASH [93]. However, the mechanisms and pathways that lead to the progression of NAFLD due to mitochondrial dysfunction are still unclear [94]. It is well known that the accumulation of hepatic free FA and triglycerides disrupts mitochondrial function and homeostasis, which are fundamental for the maintenance of normal energy, oxidant, and metabolic status [95]. This accumulation of free FA induces a metabolic shift by stimulating oxidative phosphorylation, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and FA β-oxidation. Mitochondrial dysfunction in NASH also comprises alterations in electron transport chain and membrane potential, inducing the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition and reduction in ATP synthesis [94]. Moreover, intracellular free FA accumulation enhances lipotoxicity through generation of ROS by respiratory chain complex enzymes during energy formation. ROS inhibit respiratory chain complex enzymes, and, as a result, ATP synthesis drops off [95,96]. This decrease in ATP levels may aggravate ER stress through the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which in turn activates de novo lipogenesis pathways and further aggravates steatosis [97]. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also linked to HCC progression through increased ROS production, impaired mitochondrial respiration, ER stress, and alteration of nutrient metabolism [98].
Mitochondria-derived ROS and lipid peroxidation promote the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β), which may be an important link between the initial metabolic shift and consecutive hepatocyte death and progression of hepatic fibrosis in NASH [99]. DAMPs, such as saturated FA, as well as PAMPs activate NLRP3 inflammasome-like products of gut microbiota delivered to the liver [86]. Extensive evidence suggests that saturated FAs represent an endogenous danger in the first hit of NASH by upregulating the inflammasome and thus sensitizing to second hits such as LPS for IL-1β release [100]. In recent years, emerging data have demonstrated the role of activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the pathogenesis of NASH, where NLRP3 plays an important role in the detection of inflammatory signals and conversion of these into an inflammatory response in the gut–liver axis. Moreover, it has been shown that the NLRP3 inflammasome plays an important role in steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in experimental models of liver disease and that blocking its activation could be a potential therapy to slow down the progression of the disease [101]. In this regard, it has been shown that in the GSDMD-knockout mice steatohepatitis is ameliorated compared to WT mice, which exhibit enhanced hepatic NLRP3 inflammasome expression, reinforcing NASH progression [53,102]. Researchers have demonstrated that reduction of NLRP3 expression in adipose tissue prevented the obesity-induced inflammasome activation in liver and improved insulin sensitivity in obese type-2 diabetic patients [103]. Additional evidence indicated that NLRP1/3 inflammasome levels increased in a mouse model of NASH caused by HFCD (high fat calorie diet) plus high fructose and glucose in the drinking water. By reducing NLRP3 inflammasome activity, HFCD plus high fructose-fed mice exhibited significantly improved obesity-associated metabolic abnormalities [95]. Further support for the role of NLRP3 in NASH was provided by blocking NRLP3 inflammasome with a specific antagonist, IFM-514, in mice fed a methionine/choline-deficient diet (MCD), resulting in reduced caspase-1 activation, decreased hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis [9]. Moreover, Mridha et al. used a NLRP3 inhibitor, MCC950, in order to reduce liver injury in NASH in a murine model of steatohepatitis caused by feeding mice with MCD/WD (Western diet), leading to a decrease in transaminase levels, liver fibrosis, and cytokine levels compared to the mice treated with the vehicle [104].
Increase in liver cholesterol either through the diet or enhanced endogenous synthesis controlled by SREBP2 has emerged as an important player in NASH and the progression towards HCC [105,106]. Cholesterol, and particularly its trafficking to mitochondria, can cause oxidative stress, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and reduction in ATP content and steatosis. It is also suggested that overload of free cholesterol disrupts mitochondrial and ER membrane integrity. Thus, cumulative evidence suggests that cholesterol overload in mitochondria induces redox imbalances, leading to oxidative stress and cell death associated with steatohepatitis [107]. Moreover, additional evidence demonstrated that inflammasome-mediated cholesterol crystallization in KCs is an important factor during the progression of hepatic inflammation in NASH [108,109]. Benzyl isothiocyanate, a natural compound with chemopreventive properties, protected against NASH development, with the amelioration of LPS- and cholesterol crystal-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in KCs [110]. In vitro data using HepG2 cells indicated the ability of palmitate to induce hepatic steatosis and inflammasome activation [111]. In foz/foz mice fed with a high-fat diet, the treatment with ezetimibe and atorvastatin reduced hepatic cholesterol content and hepatic cholesterol crystals, ameliorating inflammation and fibrosis and leading to an improved NASH regression [112]. To sum up, cholesterol-lowering drugs can be of potential relevance to modify NAFLD pathology and disease progression, suggesting that this approach may be a potential approach for inflammasome deactivation. Whether selectively targeting the mitochondrial cholesterol pool ameliorates the NLRP3 activation in NASH remains to be further investigated.

6. Sphingolipids and NLRP3 Inflammasome in NASH

Sphingolipids are important components of membrane bilayers, where they play structural and functional roles in the regulation of multiple cell functions, including immunity, inflammation, and metabolic diseases [113]. Ceramide is the central molecule in sphingolipid metabolism, and it can be catabolized into sphingosine, which can be further phosphorylated into sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). They can be generated by de novo synthesis pathway from serine and palmitoyl-CoA in the ER or can also be produced through the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin (SM), catalyzed by sphingomyelinases (SMases), and/or by a third pathway called salvage/recycling pathway, in which ceramide is recycled from sphingosine by ceramide synthase (CerSs) [114]. Acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) is localized in the lysosomes and can be activated by ROS, LPS, and TNF-α [115,116,117]. Moreover, ceramides have shown the ability to activate key inflammasome pathway players, such as TLR4 and NLRP3 [118,119].
A number of studies have demonstrated that modifications to sphingolipid metabolism can attenuate the NAFLD pathology [120,121,122,123]. In relation to the mechanisms by which sphingolipids mediate activation of inflammasome, Koh et al. indicated that sphingomyelin synthase 1 (SMS1) mediates hepatocyte pyroptosis through a novel diacylglycerol (DAG)–protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ)–NLR family CARD domain-containing protein 4 (NLRC4) axis in NASH [124]. Furthermore, it has also been reported that sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor 4 (S1PR4) may be a new therapeutic target for NASH, mediating the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in hepatic macrophages through inositol trisphosphate/inositol trisphosphate-receptor-dependent [Ca2+] signaling [125]. SLB736, an antagonist for S1PR4 receptor, showed its effect in the prevention of NASH and hepatic fibrosis development [125]. In this regard, targeting sphingolipid metabolism, through the inhibition of SMS1 or S1PRs, may be of potential relevance to prevent NLRP3 inflammasome activation, which plays a central role in NASH progression [9,104,126].

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Despite the advances in understanding the mechanisms responsible for NALD and ALD development and its progression to NASH and ASH, many aspects remain unclear. Unfortunately, the molecular mechanisms leading to ASH and NASH are not completely understood, and, therefore, there is an urgent need to find new therapeutic targets for intervention. In this review, we addressed the most important pathogenetic processes involved in the development of liver diseases, pointing to the NLRP3 inflammasome as a key player in the development of the disease. For future therapies, it might be essential to analyze the pyroptosis mechanism and its activation through the inflammasome.

Author Contributions

S.T., P.S., C.G.-R. and J.C.F.-C. revised the literature, discussed reported findings, and conceived the focus of the review. S.T. and P.S. conceived the figures. S.T., P.S., C.G.-R. and J.C.F.-C. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the support from the grants PID2019-111669RB-I00 and PID2020-115055RB-I00 from Plan Nacional de I+D funded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) and from the CIBEREHD; the center grant P50AA011999 Southern California Research Center for ALPD and Cirrhosis funded by NIAAA/NIH; as well as support from AGAUR of the Generalitat de Catalunya SGR-2017-1112, European Cooperation in Science & Technology (COST) ACTION CA17112 Prospective European Drug- Induced Liver Injury Network, and the Red Nacional 2018-102799-T de Enfermedades Metabólicas y Cáncer, and the Project 201916/31 ‘Contribution of mitochondrial oxysterol and bile acid metabolism to liver carcinogenesis’ 2019 by Fundació Marató TV3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

All the authors are very grateful to Conde de la Rosa for her excellent English editing assistance. Cartoons in Figure 1 and Figure 2 were created with BioRender.com (accessed on 17 Janurary 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

4-HNE4-hydroxynonenal
ASMaseacid sphingomyelinase
ADHalcohol dehydrogenase
AHalcoholic hepatitis
AIM2absent in melanoma 2
ALDalcoholic liver disease
ALDHacetaldehyde dehydrogenase
AMPK5′-AMP-activated protein kinase
ASCadaptor apoptosis speck protein
ASHalcoholic steatohepatitis
ATPadenosine triphosphate
CATcatalase
CerSsceramide synthase
CYP2E1cytochrome P450 2E1
DAGdiacylglycerol
DAMPSdanger-associated molecular patterns
ERendoplasmic reticulum
FAfatty acid
GSDMDgasdermin D
GSHglutathione
GSH-Pxglutathione peroxidase
GSSG-Rxglutathione reductase
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
HSChepatic stellate cells
IL-18interleukin-18
IL-1βinterleukin-1β
IL-6interleukin-6
IRinsulin resistance
KCKupffer cells
LPSlipopolysaccharide
MAFLDmetabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease
MAMmitochondria-associated membranes
MCDmethionine/choline-deficient diet
MDAmalondialdehyde
mGSHmitochondrial glutathione
miRNAsmicroRNAs
MMPmitochondria membrane potential
mt-DNAmitochondrial DNA
mtROSmitochondrial ROS
NADH/NAD+oxidized and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ratio
NAFLnonalcoholic fatty liver
NAFLDnonalcoholic fatty liver disease
NASHnonalcoholic steatohepatitis
NF-κBnuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NLRC4nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors CARD domain-containing protein 4
NLRP3nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor protein 3
ox-mtDNAoxidized mitochondrial DNA
PAMPSpathogen-associated molecular patterns
PKCδprotein kinase Cδ
PPARαperoxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α
ROSreactive oxidative species
S1Psphingosine-1-phosphate
S1PRssphingosine 1-phosphate receptors
S1PR4type 4 sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor
SMsphingomyelin
SMasessphingomyelinases
SMS1sphingomyelin synthase 1
SODsuperoxide dismutase
SQSTM1/p62sequestosome-1
SREBP1csterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c
T2DMtype 2 diabetes mellitus
TCAtricarboxylic acid cycle
TLRtoll-like receptor
TNF-αtumor necrosis factor alpha
TXNIPthioredoxin-interacting protein
UPRunfolded protein response
VDACvoltage-dependent anion-selective channel
WDWestern diet
WHOWorld Health Organization

References

  1. Argemi, J.; Ventura-Cots, M.; Rachakonda, V.; Bataller, R. Alcoholic-Related Liver Disease: Pathogenesis, Management and Future Therapeutic Developments. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2020, 112, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cariello, M.; Piccinin, E.; Moschetta, A. Transcriptional Regulation of Metabolic Pathways via Lipid-Sensing Nuclear Receptors PPARs, FXR, and LXR in NASH. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 11, 1519–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pelusi, S.; Cespiati, A.; Rametta, R.; Pennisi, G.; Mannisto, V.; Rosso, C.; Baselli, G.; Dongiovanni, P.; Fracanzani, A.L.; Badiali, S.; et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Significant Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Without Steatohepatitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 2310–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  4. Singh, S.; Allen, A.M.; Wang, Z.; Prokop, L.J.; Murad, M.H.; Loomba, R. Fibrosis Progression in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver vs. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Paired-Biopsy Studies. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 13, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Robertson, D.J.; Yang, V.W.; Mansouri, A.; Gattolliat, C.-H.; Asselah, T. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Chronic Liver Diseases. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 629–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  6. Ribas, V.; García-Ruiz, C.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Glutathione and Mitochondria. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  7. Zhou, R.; Yazdi, A.S.; Menu, P.; Tschopp, J. A Role for Mitochondria in NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Nature 2011, 469, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kelley, N.; Jeltema, D.; Duan, Y.; He, Y. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: An Overview of Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Torres, S.; Brol, M.J.; Magdaleno, F.; Schierwagen, R.; Uschner, F.E.; Klein, S.; Ortiz, C.; Tyc, O.; Bachtler, N.; Stunden, J.; et al. The Specific NLRP3 Antagonist IFM-514 Decreases Fibrosis and Inflammation in Experimental Murine Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 715765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schroder, K.; Tschopp, J. The Inflammasomes. Cell 2010, 140, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Guo, H.; Callaway, J.B.; Ting, J.P.Y. Inflammasomes: Mechanism of Action, Role in Disease, and Therapeutics. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  12. Zheng, D.; Liwinski, T.; Elinav, E. Inflammasome Activation and Regulation: Toward a Better Understanding of Complex Mechanisms. Cell Discov. 2020, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zahid, A.; Li, B.; Kombe, A.J.K.; Jin, T.; Tao, J. Pharmacological Inhibitors of the Nlrp3 Inflammasome. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Dong, Z.; Song, W. NLRP3 Inflammasome as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Alzheimer’s Disease. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rodríguez-Antonio, I.; López-Sánchez, G.N.; Uribe, M.; Chávez-Tapia, N.C.; Nuño-Lámbarri, N. Role of the Inflammasome, Gasdermin D, and Pyroptosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 36, 2720–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Fucho, R.; Torres, S.; Nuñez, S.; Nuño-Lámbarri, N.; Enrich, C.; García-Ruiz, C.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Cholesterol Enrichment in Liver Mitochondria Impairs Oxidative Phosphorylation and Disrupts the Assembly of Respiratory Supercomplexes. Redox Biol. 2019, 24, 101214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brookes, P.S.; Yoon, Y.; Robotham, J.L.; Anders, M.W.; Sheu, S.S. Calcium, ATP, and ROS: A Mitochondrial Love-Hate Triangle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004, 287, C817–C833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, S.; Tan, H.Y.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Z.J.; Lao, L.; Wong, C.W.; Feng, Y. The Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Liver Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 26087–26124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. He, L.; He, T.; Farrar, S.; Ji, L.; Liu, T.; Ma, X. Antioxidants Maintain Cellular Redox Homeostasis by Elimination of Reactive Oxygen Species. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 44, 532–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hong, T.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Lu, Y. The Role and Mechanism of Oxidative Stress and Nuclear Receptors in the Development of NAFLD. Oxidative Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 6889533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quan, Y.; Xin, Y.; Tian, G.; Zhou, J.; Liu, X. Mitochondrial ROS-Modulated MtDNA: A Potential Target for Cardiac Aging. Oxidative Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  22. Shimada, K.; Crother, T.R.; Karlin, J.; Dagvadorj, J.; Chiba, N.; Chen, S.; Ramanujan, V.K.; Wolf, A.J.; Vergnes, L.; Ojcius, D.M.; et al. Oxidized Mitochondrial DNA Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome during Apoptosis. Immunity 2012, 36, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  23. Iyer, S.S.; He, Q.; Janczy, J.R.; Elliott, E.I.; Zhong, Z.; Olivier, A.K.; Sadler, J.J.; Knepper-Adrian, V.; Han, R.; Qiao, L.; et al. Mitochondrial Cardiolipin Is Required for Nlrp3 Inflammasome Activation. Immunity 2013, 39, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  24. Hayashi, T.; Rizzuto, R.; Hajnoczky, G.; Su, T.P. MAM: More than Just a Housekeeper. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Yu, J.W.; Lee, M.S. Mitochondria and the NLRP3 Inflammasome: Physiological and Pathological Relevance. Arch. Pharmacal. Res. 2016, 39, 1503–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhong, Z.; Umemura, A.; Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Liang, S.; Shalapour, S.; Wong, J.; He, F.; Boassa, D.; Perkins, G.; Ali, S.R.; et al. NF-ΚB Restricts Inflammasome Activation via Elimination of Damaged Mitochondria. Cell 2016, 164, 896–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  27. Arroyave-Ospina, J.C.; Wu, Z.; Geng, Y.; Moshage, H. Role of Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Implications for Prevention and Therapy. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hoque, R.; Vodovotz, Y.; Mehal, W. Therapeutic Strategies in Inflammasome Mediated Diseases of the Liver. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 1047–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Rehm, J.; Samokhvalov, A.V.; Shield, K.D. Global Burden of Alcoholic Liver Diseases. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Han, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Ma, J.; Chandler, K.; Liangpunsakul, S. Epidemiology of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. Clin. Liver Dis. 2021, 25, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Becker, U.; Deis, A.; Sorensen, T.I.; Gronbaek, M.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Muller, C.F.; Schnohr, P.; Jensen, G. Prediction of Risk of Liver Disease by Alcohol Intake, Sex, and Age: A Prospective Population Study. Hepatology 1996, 23, 1025–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Seitz, H.K.; Bataller, R.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Gao, B.; Gual, A.; Lackner, C.; Mathurin, P.; Mueller, S.; Szabo, G.; Tsukamoto, H. Alcoholic Liver Disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Farooq, M.O.; Bataller, R. Pathogenesis and management of alcoholic liver disease. Dig. Dis. 2016, 34, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  34. Llovet, J.M.; Kelley, R.K.; Villanueva, A.; Singal, A.G.; Pikarsky, E.; Roayaie, S.; Lencioni, R.; Koike, K.; Zucman-Rossi, J.; Finn, R.S. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2021, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cederbaum, A.I. Alcohol metabolism. Clin. Liver Dis. 2012, 16, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  36. Teschke, R. Alcoholic Liver Disease: Alcohol Metabolism, Cascade of Molecular Mechanisms, Cellular Targets, and Clinical Aspects. Biomedicines 2018, 6, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Pohl, K.; Moodley, P.; Dhanda, A.D. Alcohol’s Impact on the Gut and Liver. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Purohit, V.; Gao, B.; Song, B.J. Molecular Mechanisms of Alcoholic Fatty Liver. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2009, 33, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  39. You, M.; Fischer, M.; Deeg, M.A.; Crabb, D.W. Ethanol Induces Fatty Acid Synthesis Pathways by Activation of Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein (SREBP). J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 29342–29347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. You, M.; Arteel, G.E. Effect of Ethanol on Lipid Metabolism. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Liu, J. Ethanol and Liver: Recent Insights into the Mechanisms of Ethanol-Induced Fatty Liver. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 2014, 20, 14672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fernandez-Checa, J.C.; Kaplowitz, N. Hepatic Mitochondrial Glutathione: Transport and Role in Disease and Toxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2005, 204, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ramos-Tovar, E.; Muriel, P. Molecular Mechanisms That Link Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Fibrosis in the Liver. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Slevin, E.; Baiocchi, L.; Wu, N.; Ekser, B.; Sato, K.; Lin, E.; Ceci, L.; Chen, L.; Lorenzo, S.R.; Xu, W.; et al. Kupffer Cells: Inflammation Pathways and Cell-Cell Interactions in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2020, 190, 2185–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Knorr, J.; Wree, A.; Tacke, F.; Feldstein, A.E. The NLRP3 Inflammasome in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Semin. Liver Dis. 2020, 40, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Iracheta-Vellve, A.; Petrasek, J.; Gyogyosi, B.; Bala, S.; Csak, T.; Kodys, K.; Szabo, G. Interleukin-1 Inhibition Facilitates Recovery from Liver Injury and Promotes Regeneration of Hepatocytes in Alcoholic Hepatitis in Mice. Liver Int. 2017, 37, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boaru, S.G.; Borkham-Kamphorst, E.; Tihaa, L.; Haas, U.; Weiskirchen, R. Expression Analysis of Inflammasomes in Experimental Models of Inflammatory and Fibrotic Liver Disease. J. Inflamm. 2012, 9, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  48. Le Daré, B.; Ferron, P.J.; Gicquel, T. The Purinergic P2 × 7 Receptor-NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathway: A New Target in Alcoholic Liver Disease? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ren, W.; Rubini, P.; Tang, Y.; Engel, T.; Illes, P. Inherent P2 × 7 Receptors Regulate Macrophage Functions during Inflammatory Diseases. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Khanam, A.; Saleeb, P.G.; Kottilil, S. Pathophysiology and Treatment Options for Hepatic Fibrosis: Can It Be Completely Cured? Cells 2021, 10, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Petrasek, J.; Bala, S.; Csak, T.; Lippai, D.; Kodys, K.; Menashy, V.; Barrieau, M.; Min, S.Y.; Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Szabo, G. IL-1 Receptor Antagonist Ameliorates Inflammasome-Dependent Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 3476–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  52. Heo, M.J.; Kim, T.H.; You, J.S.; Blaya, D.; Sancho-Bru, P.; Kim, S.G. Alcohol Dysregulates MiR-148a in Hepatocytes through FoxO1, Facilitating Pyroptosis via TXNIP Overexpression. Gut 2019, 68, 708–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  53. Khanova, E.; Wu, R.; Wang, W.; Yan, R.; Chen, Y.; French, S.W.; Llorente, C.; Pan, S.Q.; Yang, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. Pyroptosis by Caspase11/4-Gasdermin-D Pathway in Alcoholic Hepatitis in Mice and Patients. Hepatology 2018, 67, 1737–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  54. Fromenty, B.; Grimbert, S.; Mansouri, A.; Beaugrand, M.; Erlinger, S.; Rötig, A.; Pessayre, D. Hepatic Mitochondrial DNA Deletion in Alcoholics: Association with Microvesicular Steatosis. Gastroenterology 1995, 108, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bansal, S.; Anandatheerthavarada, H.K.; Prabu, G.K.; Milne, G.L.; Martin, M.V.; Guengerich, F.P.; Avadhani, N.G. Human Cytochrome P450 2E1 Mutations That Alter Mitochondrial Targeting Efficiency and Susceptibility to Ethanol-Induced Toxicity in Cellular Models. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 12627–12644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  56. Robin, M.A.; Anandatheerthavarada, H.K.; Fang, J.K.; Cudic, M.; Otros, L.; Avadhani, N.G. Mitochondrial Targeted Cytochrome P450 2E1 (P450 MT5) Contains an Intact N Terminus and Requires Mitochondrial Specific Electron Transfer Proteins for Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 24680–24689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  57. Wu, D.; Cederbaum, A.I. Ethanol Cytotoxicity to a Transfected HepG2 Cell Line Expressing Human Cytochrome P4502E1. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 23914–23919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  58. Angireddy, R.; Chowdhury, A.R.; Zielonka, J.; Ruthel, G.; Kalyanaraman, B.; Avadhani, N.G. Alcohol-Induced CYP2E1, Mitochondrial Dynamics and Retrograde Signaling in Human Hepatic 3D Organoids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 159, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Knockaert, L.; Fromenty, B.; Robin, M.A. Mechanisms of Mitochondrial Targeting of Cytochrome P450 2E1: Physiopathological Role in Liver Injury and Obesity. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 4252–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abdelmegeed, M.A.; Ha, S.-K.; Choi, Y.; Akbar, M.; Song, B.-J. Role of CYP2E1 in Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Hepatic Tissue Injury in Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Diseases. Curr. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 10, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  61. Yang, C.; He, X.; Zhao, J.; Huang, W. Hepatoprotection by Ginsenoside Rg1 in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 92, 107327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lu, Y.; Wu, D.; Wang, X.; Ward, S.C.; Cederbaum, A.I. Chronic Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury and Oxidant Stress Are Decreased in Cytochrome P4502E1 Knockout Mice and Restored in Humanized Cytochrome P4502E1 Knock-in Mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 1406–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  63. Zhao, J.; He, B.; Zhang, S.; Huang, W.; Li, X. Ginsenoside Rg1 Alleviates Acute Liver Injury through the Induction of Autophagy and Suppressing NF-ΚB/NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, X.; Wu, D.; Yang, L.; Gan, L.; Cederbaum, A.I. Cyto Chrome P450 2E1 Potentiates Ethanol Induction of Hypoxia and HIF-1α In Vivo. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 63, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  65. Mansfield, K.D.; Guzy, R.D.; Pan, Y.; Young, R.M.; Cash, T.P.; Schumacker, P.T.; Simon, M.C. Mitochondrial Dysfunction Resulting from Loss of Cytochrome c Impairs Cellular Oxygen Sensing and Hypoxic HIF-α Activation. Cell Metab. 2005, 1, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  66. Guzy, R.D.; Hoyos, B.; Robin, E.; Chen, H.; Liu, L.; Mansfield, K.D.; Simon, M.C.; Hammerling, U.; Schumacker, P.T. Mitochondrial Complex III Is Required for Hypoxia-Induced ROS Production and Cellular Oxygen Sensing. Cell Metab. 2005, 1, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  67. Lu, X.; Xuan, W.; Li, J.; Yao, H.; Huang, C.; Li, J. AMPK Protects against Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury through UQCRC2 to up-Regulate Mitophagy. Autophagy 2021, 17, 3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Inagaki, T.; Koike, M.; Ikuta, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Suzuki, M.; Kato, K.; Kato, K. Ultrastructural Identification and Clinical Significance of Light Microscopic Giant Mitochondria in Alcoholic Liver Injuries. Gastroenterol. Jpn. 1989, 24, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Palma, E.; Riva, A.; Moreno, C.; Odena, G.; Mudan, S.; Manyakin, N.; Miquel, R.; Degré, D.; Trepo, E.; Sancho-Bru, P.; et al. Perturbations in Mitochondrial Dynamics Are Closely Involved in the Progression of Alcoholic Liver Disease. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2020, 44, 856–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Palma, E.; Ma, X.; Riva, A.; Iansante, V.; Dhawan, A.; Wang, S.; Ni, H.M.; Sesaki, H.; Williams, R.; Ding, W.X.; et al. Dynamin-1-Like Protein Inhibition Drives Megamitochondria Formation as an Adaptive Response in Alcohol-Induced Hepatotoxicity. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  71. Colell, A.; García-Ruiz, C.; Miranda, M.; Ardite, E.; Marí, M.; Morales, A.; Corrales, F.; Kaplowitz, N.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Selective Glutathione Depletion of Mitochondria by Ethanol Sensitizes Hepatocytes to Tumor Necrosis Factor. Gastroenterology 1998, 115, 1541–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, Q.; Zhong, W.; Qiu, Y.; Kang, X.; Sun, X.; Tan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, X.; Jia, W.; Zhou, Z. Preservation of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-4α Contributes to the Beneficial Effect of Dietary Medium Chain Triglyceride on Alcohol-Induced Hepatic Lipid Dyshomeostasis in Rats. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2013, 37, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  73. García-Ruiz, C.; Kaplowitz, N.; Fernandez-Checa, J.C. Role of Mitochondria in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Curr. Pathobiol. Rep. 2013, 1, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  74. Torres, S.; Baulies, A.; Insausti-Urkia, N.; Alarcón-Vila, C.; Fucho, R.; Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Núñez, S.; Robles, D.; Ribas, V.; Wakefield, L.; et al. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Induced Upregulation of STARD1 Promotes Acetaminophen-Induced Acute Liver Failure. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 552–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  75. Fernandez, A.; Matias, N.; Fucho, R.; Ribas, V.; Von Montfort, C.; Nuño, N.; Baulies, A.; Martinez, L.; Tarrats, N.; Mari, M.; et al. ASMase Is Required for Chronic Alcohol Induced Hepatic Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Mitochondrial Cholesterol Loading. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  76. Torres, S.; Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Nuñez, S.; Matías, N.; Insausti-Urkia, N.; Castro, F.; Casasempere, M.; Fabriás, G.; Casas, J.; Enrich, C.; et al. Acid Ceramidase Improves Mitochondrial Function and Oxidative Stress in Niemann-Pick Type C Disease by Repressing STARD1 Expression and Mitochondrial Cholesterol Accumulation. Redox Biol. 2021, 45, 102052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Conde de la Rosa, L.; Garcia-Ruiz, C.; Vallejo, C.; Baulies, A.; Nuñez, S.; Monte, M.J.; Marin, J.J.G.; Baila-Rueda, L.; Cenarro, A.; Civeira, F.; et al. STARD1 Promotes NASH-Driven HCC by Sustaining the Generation of Bile Acids through the Alternative Mitochondrial Pathway. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 1429–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gao, B.; Argemi, J.; Bataller, R.; Schnabl, B. Serum Acylcarnitines Associated with High Short-Term Mortality in Patients with Alcoholic Hepatitis. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lemasters, J.J.; Holmuhamedov, E.L.; Czerny, C.; Zhong, Z.; Maldonado, E.N. Regulation of Mitochondrial Function by Voltage Dependent Anion Channels in Ethanol Metabolism and the Warburg Effect. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818, 1536–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  80. Byrne, C.D.; Targher, G. NAFLD: A Multisystem Disease. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, S47–S64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  81. Gariani, K.; Jornayvaz, F.R. Pathophysiology of NASH in Endocrine Diseases. Endocr. Connect. 2021, 10, R52–R65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pappachan, J.M.; Babu, S.; Krishnan, B.; Ravindran, N.C. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Clinical Update. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2017, 5, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  83. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease—Meta-Analytic Assessment of Prevalence, Incidence, and Outcomes. Hepatology 2016, 64, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  84. Puri, P.; Sanyal, A.J. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Definitions, Risk Factors, and Workup. Clin. Liver Dis. 2012, 1, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Colak, Y.; Tuncer, I.; Senates, E.; Ozturk, O.; Doganay, L.; Yilmaz, Y. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Nutritional Approach. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2012, 10, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Friedman, S.L.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Rinella, M.; Sanyal, A.J. Mechanisms of NAFLD Development and Therapeutic Strategies. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 908–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Parthasarathy, G.; Revelo, X.; Malhi, H. Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: An Overview. Hepatol. Commun. 2020, 4, 478–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  88. Guilherme, A.; Virbasius, J.V.; Puri, V.; Czech, M.P. Adipocyte Dysfunctions Linking Obesity to Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  89. Buzzetti, E.; Pinzani, M.; Tsochatzis, E.A. The Multiple-Hit Pathogenesis of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Metabolism 2016, 65, 1038–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chalasani, N.; Younossi, Z.; Lavine, J.E.; Charlton, M.; Cusi, K.; Rinella, M.; Harrison, S.A.; Brunt, E.M.; Sanyal, A.J. The Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018, 67, 328–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Younossi, Z.M.; Rinella, M.E.; Sanyal, A.J.; Harrison, S.A.; Brunt, E.M.; Goodman, Z.; Cohen, D.E.; Loomba, R. From NAFLD to MAFLD: Implications of a Premature Change in Terminology. Hepatology 2021, 73, 1194–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Xian, Y.X.; Weng, J.P.; Xu, F. MAFLD vs. NAFLD: Shared Features and Potential Changes in Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Pharmacotherapy. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 134, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sunny, N.E.; Bril, F.; Cusi, K. Mitochondrial Adaptation in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Novel Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Simões, I.C.M.; Fontes, A.; Pinton, P.; Zischka, H.; Wieckowski, M.R. Mitochondria in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 95, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, N.P.; Liu, X.J.; Xie, L.; Shen, X.Z.; Wu, J. Impaired Mitophagy Triggers NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation during the Progression from Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 749–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Farruggio, S.; Cocomazzi, G.; Marotta, P.; Romito, R.; Surico, D.; Calamita, G.; Bellan, M.; Pirisi, M.; Grossini, E. Genistein and 17β-Estradiol Protect Hepatocytes from Fatty Degeneration by Mechanisms Involving Mitochondria, Inflammasome and Kinases Activation. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 54, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lee, J.; Homma, T.; Fujii, J. Mice in the Early Stage of Liver Steatosis Caused by a High Fat Diet Are Resistant to Thioacetamide-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Oxidative Stress. Toxicol. Lett. 2017, 277, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ribas, V.; García-Ruiz, C.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Mitochondria, Cholesterol and Cancer Cell Metabolism. Clin. Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  99. Léveillé, M.; Estall, J.L. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Transition from NASH to HCC. Metabolites 2019, 9, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  100. Csak, T.; Ganz, M.; Pespisa, J.; Kodys, K.; Dolganiuc, A.; Szabo, G. Fatty Acid and Endotoxin Activate Inflammasomes in Mouse Hepatocytes That Release Danger Signals to Stimulate Immune Cells. Hepatology 2011, 54, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  101. Colak, Y.; Hasan, B.; Erkalma, B.; Tandon, K.; Zervos, X.; Menzo, E.L.; Erim, T. Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Inhibition of the Inflammasome as a New Therapeutic Target. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2021, 45, 101710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Al Mamun, A.; Akter, A.; Hossain, S.; Sarker, T.; Safa, S.A.; Mustafa, Q.G.; Muhammad, S.A.; Munir, F. Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Liver Disease. J. Dig. Dis. 2020, 21, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Vandanmagsar, B.; Youm, Y.H.; Ravussin, A.; Galgani, J.E.; Stadler, K.; Mynatt, R.L.; Ravussin, E.; Stephens, J.M.; Dixit, V.D. The NLRP3 Inflammasome Instigates Obesity-Induced Inflammation and Insulin Resistance. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mridha, A.R.; Wree, A.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Yeh, M.M.; Johnson, C.D.; Van Rooyen, D.M.; Haczeyni, F.; Teoh, N.C.H.; Savard, C.; Ioannou, G.N.; et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome Blockade Reduces Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis in Experimental NASH in Mice. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ribas, V.; de La Rosa, L.C.; Robles, D.; Núñez, S.; Segalés, P.; Insausti-Urkia, N.; Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Fernández-Checa, J.C.; García-Ruiz, C. Dietary and Genetic Cholesterol Loading Rather Than Steatosis Promotes Liver Tumorigenesis and NASH-Driven HCC. Cancers 2021, 13, 4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Caballero, F.; Fernández, A.; de Lacy, A.M.; Fernández-Checa, J.C.; Caballería, J.; García-Ruiz, C. Enhanced Free Cholesterol, SREBP-2 and StAR Expression in Human NASH. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Garcia-Ruiz, C.; Mari, M.; Colell, A.; Morales, A.; Caballero, F.; Montero, J.; Terrones, O.; Basañez, G.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Mitochondrial Cholesterol in Health and Disease. Histol. Histopathol. 2009, 24, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hendrikx, T.; Bieghs, V.; Walenbergh, S.M.A.; Van Gorp, P.J.; Verheyen, F.; Jeurissen, M.L.J.; Steinbusch, M.M.F.; Vaes, N.; Binder, C.J.; Koek, G.H.; et al. Macrophage Specific Caspase-1/11 Deficiency Protects against Cholesterol Crystallization and Hepatic Inflammation in Hyperlipidemic Mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  109. Ioannou, G.N.; Haigh, W.G.; Thorning, D.; Savard, C. Hepatic Cholesterol Crystals and Crown-like Structures Distinguish NASH from Simple Steatosis. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 1326–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  110. Chen, H.W.; Yen, C.C.; Kuo, L.L.; Lo, C.W.; Huang, C.S.; Chen, C.C.; Lii, C.K. Benzyl Isothiocyanate Ameliorates High-Fat/Cholesterol/Cholic Acid Diet-Induced Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis through Inhibiting Cholesterol Crystal-Activated NLRP3 Inflammasome in Kupffer Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2020, 393, 114941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bashiri, A.; Nesan, D.; Tavallaee, G.; Sue-Chue-Lam, I.; Chien, K.; Maguire, G.F.; Naples, M.; Zhang, J.; Magomedova, L.; Adeli, K.; et al. Cellular Cholesterol Accumulation Modulates High Fat High Sucrose (HFHS) Diet-Induced ER Stress and Hepatic Inflammasome Activation in the Development of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1861, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ioannou, G.N.; Van Rooyen, D.M.; Savard, C.; Haigh, W.G.; Yeh, M.M.; Teoh, N.C.; Farrell, G.C. Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs Cause Dissolution of Cholesterol Crystals and Disperse Kupffer Cell Crown-like Structures during Resolution of NASH. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  113. Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M. Principles of Bioactiv.ve Lipid Signalling: Lessons from Sphingolipids. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hajduch, E.; Lachkar, F.; Ferré, P.; Foufelle, F. Roles of Ceramides in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Garcia-Ruiz, C.; Mato, J.M.; Vance, D.; Kaplowitz, N.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Acid Sphingomyelinase-Ceramide System in Steatohepatitis: A Novel Target Regulating Multiple Pathways. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mallampalli, R.K.; Peterson, E.J.; Carter, A.B.; Salome, R.G.; Mathur, S.N.; Koretzky, G.A. TNF-Alpha Increases Ceramide without Inducing Apoptosis in Alveolar Type II Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, L481–L490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Krogh-Madsen, R.; Plomgaard, P.; Møller, K.; Mittendorfer, B.; Pedersen, B.K. Influence of TNF-Alpha and IL-6 Infusions on Insulin Sensitivity and Expression of IL-18 in Humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 291, E108–E114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chaurasia, B.; Talbot, C.L.; Summers, S.A. Adipocyte Ceramides—The Nexus of Inflammation and Metabolic Disease. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Holland, W.L.; Bikman, B.T.; Wang, L.P.; Yuguang, G.; Sargent, K.M.; Bulchand, S.; Knotts, T.A.; Shui, G.; Clegg, D.J.; Wenk, M.R.; et al. Lipid-Induced Insulin Resistance Mediated by the Proinflammatory Receptor TLR4 Requires Saturated Fatty Acid-Induced Ceramide Biosynthesis in Mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 1858–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  120. Martínez, L.; Torres, S.; Baulies, A.; Alarcón-Vila, C.; Elena, M.; Fabriàs, G.; Casas, J.; Caballeria, J.; Fernandez-Checa, J.C.; García-Ruiz, C. Myristic Acid Potentiates Palmitic Acid-Induced Lipotoxicity and Steatohepatitis Associated with Lipodystrophy by Sustaning de Novo Ceramide Synthesis. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 41479–41496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  121. Ussher, J.R.; Koves, T.R.; Cadete, V.J.J.; Zhang, L.; Jaswal, J.S.; Swyrd, S.J.; Lopaschuk, D.G.; Proctor, S.D.; Keung, W.; Muoio, D.M.; et al. Inhibition of de Novo Ceramide Synthesis Reverses Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance and Enhances Whole-Body Oxygen Consumption. Diabetes 2010, 59, 2453–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  122. Kurek, K.; Piotrowska, D.M.; Wiesiołek-Kurek, P.; Łukaszuk, B.; Chabowski, A.; Górski, J.; Zendzian-Piotrowska, M. Inhibition of Ceramide de Novo Synthesis Reduces Liver Lipid Accumulation in Rats with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Liver Int. 2014, 34, 1074–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kasumov, T.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Gulshan, K.; Kirwan, J.P.; Liu, X.; Previs, S.; Willard, B.; Smith, J.D.; McCullough, A. Ceramide as a Mediator of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Associated Atherosclerosis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Koh, E.H.; Yoon, J.E.; Ko, M.S.; Leem, J.; Yun, J.Y.; Hong, C.H.; Cho, Y.K.; Lee, S.E.; Jang, J.E.; Baek, J.Y.; et al. Sphingomyelin Synthase 1 Mediates Hepatocyte Pyroptosis to Trigger Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gut 2021, 70, 1954–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hwan Hong, C.; Ko, M.S.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, H.; Lee, C.-H.; Yoon, J.E.; Yun, J.-Y.; Baek, I.-J.; Jang, J.E.; Lee, S.E.; et al. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 4 Promotes Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis by Activating NLRP3 Inflammasome. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 13, 925–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tilg, H.; Moschen, A.R.; Szabo, G. Interleukin-1 and Inflammasomes in Alcoholic Liver Disease/Acute Alcoholic Hepatitis and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2016, 64, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme of the pathways associated with NRLP3 inflammasome activation and mitochondrial dysfunction. PAMPs and DAMPs are recognized by TLR, as priming signal, and activate NF-κB signaling pathway, promoting the transcription of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3, while an activation signal initiates the formation of NLRP3/ASC/pro-caspase-1 complex. Subsequently, the active form of caspase-1 cleaves pro-IL-1β to mature IL-1β and GSDMD into a N-terminal fragment (N-GSDMD). N-GSDMD produces pores in the membrane, allowing the release of IL-1β into the extracellular space. The mechanisms involved in NLRP3 activation include: the destabilization of the ion outflow (K+ efflux/Ca2+ influx) creating holes in the cell membrane; the release of ROS by damaged mitochondria produced by excessive electron flow; an inhibited mitophagy and mtDNA oxidation; and the release of cathepsins by damaged lysosomes. The NLRP3 inflammasome complex activation is located in MAMs, where cardiolipin translocation and Ca2+ influx by VDAC occurs, and facilitates the assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome. ASC, adaptor apoptosis speck protein; DAMPS, damage-associated molecular patterns; GSDMD, gasdermin D; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; MAM, mitochondria-associated membranes; NF-kB, nuclear factor kappa B; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TLR, toll-like receptor.
Figure 1. Scheme of the pathways associated with NRLP3 inflammasome activation and mitochondrial dysfunction. PAMPs and DAMPs are recognized by TLR, as priming signal, and activate NF-κB signaling pathway, promoting the transcription of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3, while an activation signal initiates the formation of NLRP3/ASC/pro-caspase-1 complex. Subsequently, the active form of caspase-1 cleaves pro-IL-1β to mature IL-1β and GSDMD into a N-terminal fragment (N-GSDMD). N-GSDMD produces pores in the membrane, allowing the release of IL-1β into the extracellular space. The mechanisms involved in NLRP3 activation include: the destabilization of the ion outflow (K+ efflux/Ca2+ influx) creating holes in the cell membrane; the release of ROS by damaged mitochondria produced by excessive electron flow; an inhibited mitophagy and mtDNA oxidation; and the release of cathepsins by damaged lysosomes. The NLRP3 inflammasome complex activation is located in MAMs, where cardiolipin translocation and Ca2+ influx by VDAC occurs, and facilitates the assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome. ASC, adaptor apoptosis speck protein; DAMPS, damage-associated molecular patterns; GSDMD, gasdermin D; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; MAM, mitochondria-associated membranes; NF-kB, nuclear factor kappa B; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TLR, toll-like receptor.
Cells 11 01475 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of crosstalk between mitochondria and inflammasome in ASH and NASH. Ethanol consumption and FFA- and cholesterol-enriched diets can lead to damaged intestinal barrier where PAMPs and DAMPs such as FFA or microbial products go through the disrupted tight junctions and promote NLRP3 inflammasome activation in liver cells. This triggers the activation of caspase-1, which mediates the cleavage of pro-IL-1β and GSDMD into their mature forms, which in turn promote hepatocellular death and the attraction and activation of KCs and HSCs, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. The metabolism of ethanol and FFA in hepatocytes induces an increment in ROS in the mitochondria that in turn triggers inflammasome activation. ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH2, acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2; ASC, adaptor apoptosis speck protein; DAMPS, damage-associated molecular patterns; FFA, free fatty acid; GSDMD, gasdermin D; HSC, hepatic stellate cells; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; KC, Kupffer cells; NADH/NAD+, oxidized and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ratio; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; NK, natural killer cells; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle.
Figure 2. Mechanism of crosstalk between mitochondria and inflammasome in ASH and NASH. Ethanol consumption and FFA- and cholesterol-enriched diets can lead to damaged intestinal barrier where PAMPs and DAMPs such as FFA or microbial products go through the disrupted tight junctions and promote NLRP3 inflammasome activation in liver cells. This triggers the activation of caspase-1, which mediates the cleavage of pro-IL-1β and GSDMD into their mature forms, which in turn promote hepatocellular death and the attraction and activation of KCs and HSCs, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. The metabolism of ethanol and FFA in hepatocytes induces an increment in ROS in the mitochondria that in turn triggers inflammasome activation. ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH2, acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2; ASC, adaptor apoptosis speck protein; DAMPS, damage-associated molecular patterns; FFA, free fatty acid; GSDMD, gasdermin D; HSC, hepatic stellate cells; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; KC, Kupffer cells; NADH/NAD+, oxidized and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ratio; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; NK, natural killer cells; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle.
Cells 11 01475 g002
Table 1. Comparison of pathological characteristics and mitochondrial mechanisms in ASH and NASH.
Table 1. Comparison of pathological characteristics and mitochondrial mechanisms in ASH and NASH.
ASHNASH
Pathological characteristics>5% Steatosis
Hepatocyte ballooning
Liver fibrosis (HSC activation, extracellular matrix production)
Mallory–Denk bodies formation
Lobular inflammation (neutrophils and macrophages infiltration)
>20 g alcohol/day
Ethanol is metabolized by ADH and ALDH
Activation CYP2E1 and ROS production
Disruption of hepatic lipid metabolism (4-HNE, MDA)
Induction of lipogenic factors (SREBP1c, PPARα)
Gut dysbiosis (ethanol)
<20 g alcohol/day
Obesity
Insulin resistance
Associated T2DM
Hepatic FFA and TG
Oxidative phosphorylation, TCA and FA β-oxidation
Induction of lipogenic factors (SREBP2)
Gut dysbiosis (LPS, cholesterol crystals)
Mitochondrial mechanismsMitochondrial cholesterol accumulation (STARD1)
Calcium overload (VDAC)
Reduction in ATP production
Cardiolipin translocation
Decreased mGSH
Ox-mtDNA
Loss of MMP
Impaired mitophagy
Inflammasome complex activation (MAMs)
ROS derived from acetaldehyde metabolizationROS derived from FA β-oxidation
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torres, S.; Segalés, P.; García-Ruiz, C.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Mitochondria and the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Cells 2022, 11, 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091475

AMA Style

Torres S, Segalés P, García-Ruiz C, Fernández-Checa JC. Mitochondria and the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Cells. 2022; 11(9):1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torres, Sandra, Paula Segalés, Carmen García-Ruiz, and José C. Fernández-Checa. 2022. "Mitochondria and the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis" Cells 11, no. 9: 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop