Next Article in Journal
Sarcopenia in Children with Solid Organ Tumors: An Instrumental Era
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanistic Origin of Different Binding Affinities of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBDs to Human ACE2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/cells11081276
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distinct CholinomiR Blood Cell Signature as a Potential Modulator of the Cholinergic System in Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome

by
Christoph Erbacher
1,
Shani Vaknine
2,3,
Gilli Moshitzky
2,3,
Sebastian Lobentanzer
4,†,
Lina Eisenberg
2,3,
Dimitar Evdokimov
1,
Claudia Sommer
1,
David S. Greenberg
2,3,
Hermona Soreq
2,3,‡ and
Nurcan Üçeyler
1,*,‡
1
Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
2
The Edmond & Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel
3
The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel
4
Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
‡
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2022, 11(8), 1276; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11081276
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 4 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 9 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Small RNA Regulators of Acetylcholine Signaling)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a heterogeneous chronic pain syndrome characterized by musculoskeletal pain and other key co-morbidities including fatigue and a depressed mood. FMS involves altered functioning of the central and peripheral nervous system (CNS, PNS) and immune system, but the specific molecular pathophysiology remains unclear. Anti-cholinergic treatment is effective in FMS patient subgroups, and cholinergic signaling is a strong modulator of CNS and PNS immune processes. Therefore, we used whole blood small RNA-sequencing of female FMS patients and healthy controls to profile microRNA regulators of cholinergic transcripts (CholinomiRs). We compared microRNA profiles with those from Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with pain as disease controls. We validated the sequencing results with quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and identified cholinergic targets. Further, we measured serum cholinesterase activity in FMS patients and healthy controls. Small RNA-sequencing revealed FMS-specific changes in 19 CholinomiRs compared to healthy controls and PD patients. qRT-PCR validated miR-182-5p upregulation, distinguishing FMS patients from healthy controls. mRNA targets of CholinomiRs bone morphogenic protein receptor 2 and interleukin 6 signal transducer were downregulated. Serum acetylcholinesterase levels and cholinesterase activity in FMS patients were unchanged. Our findings identified an FMS-specific CholinomiR signature in whole blood, modulating immune-related gene expression.

1. Introduction

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a clinically heterogeneous chronic pain syndrome with a high global prevalence of approximately 2.7% [1,2]. FMS is frequently associated with somatic and mental co-morbidities accompanying predominantly musculoskeletal pain [3]. Adult women are primarily affected, but men may be underdiagnosed [4]. The pathophysiology of FMS remains incompletely understood, and no reliable biomarkers are available, resulting in insufficient diagnostics and treatment [5]. Systemic pro-inflammatory profiles [6,7] and (sub-)clinical autoimmunity [8,9] are among the etiological factors discussed. FMS may aggregate in families and single nucleotide polymorphisms, e.g., in serotonin transporter genes (SLC64A4), the transient receptor potential vanilloid channel 2 gene (TRPV2), or mitochondrial genes, which have been associated with FMS symptoms; however, overall small sample sizes hamper conclusions on an individual patient basis [10,11]. Immune dysregulation based on genetic risk factors, e.g., in mitochondrial genes, may trigger peripheral neuro-inflammatory processes, which, in turn, can induce central and peripheral pain symptoms, and the process may be further enhanced by positive feedback loops between these components [12]. Of note, small nerve fiber degeneration is a common feature in FMS [13,14].
Regarding the autonomic nervous system, higher sympathetic and lower parasympathetic activity was proposed in FMS [15]. Accordingly, FMS patients often suffer from symptoms such as constipation or irritable bladder or bowel syndrome [3,16,17]. A major cholinergic regulator of parasympathetic function is the vagus nerve (VN), which innervates smooth muscles, the gastro-intestinal tract, the heart, and, importantly, immune cells within the spleen [18]. The VN interlinks local and systemic immune processes between the CNS and PNS [19,20,21], and immune cells also express all of the necessary components of the cholinergic machinery [22]. Together, cholinergic mechanisms play an important role in the regulation of cytokines and antibody production [23,24], thereby modulating inflammatory processes with potential implications for FMS pathophysiology and severity [25,26].
In line with the clinical heterogeneity of FMS, experimental assessment of immune correlates such as cytokine transcription or protein levels provide highly variable data, which often leads to conflicting results between different study cohorts [27,28]. Here, we investigated microRNAs (miRs) expression patterns in FMS, since these small RNAs act as posttranscriptional regulators in health and disease [29,30]. Importantly, miRs from blood can be easily obtained, serving as potential biomarkers, but also represent direct modulators in pain conditions [31]. We focused specifically on CholinomiRs, a class of miRs regulating the cholinergic system. Each CholinomiR may target five or more cholinergic mRNA transcripts, thereby modulating key processes that underlie inflammation, physiological stress, and anxiety [32,33,34].
We hypothesized that the dysregulation of the systemic cholinergic system is a potential causal element of FMS pathophysiology with an impact on inflammation processes in these patients. To test this hypothesis, we carried out small RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation, followed by cholinergic mRNA target analysis and cholinesterase activity measurements in blood samples from FMS patients in comparison to healthy controls. Further, we compared the resultant FMS miR signature to those of patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease (PD)-related pain as disease controls.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants and Biomaterial Collection

Figure 1 provides a synopsis of all study participants, the biomaterial used, and the experiments performed. Forty-nine female FMS patients and twenty-five age- and sex-matched healthy controls were part of a previously characterized cohort [35]. Briefly, FMS patients were recruited according to the 1990 and 2010 diagnostic criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and all participants underwent complete neurological examination at the Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Würzburg Medical Faculty (#121/14), and all study participants gave written informed consent. For assessment of pain levels and pain-related impairment, the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) was applied [36]. Mean pain intensity within the last six months was recorded on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain, defined as NRSPain. Furthermore, patients were stratified for their subjective degree of pain-associated impairment of daily life activities, which were also rated on the NRS with 0 = normal life activities and 10 = no daily life activities possible, defined as NRSDaily life. Hereby, we defined NRSDaily life 0–2 as “mildly impaired” and NRS 3–10 as “severely impaired”.
Tempus™ Blood RNA Tubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used to collect 3 mL of whole blood from FMS patients and matched healthy controls. Blood was withdrawn in the morning with participants restrained from extensive physical activity and heavy meals the prior day, after overnight fasting. Cells were lysed and RNA was stabilized via 30 s of rigorous shaking of the tube. RNA was either extracted on the same day, or tubes were stored at −20 °C until extraction. The MagMAX™ for Stabilized Blood Tubes RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for total RNA extraction according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality and quantity were assessed with a NanoDrop™ One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and RNA was stored at −80 °C. Sequenced samples were analyzed via an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA; see details for RNA quality in Supplementary File S1).
Regarding the miR signature control groups, we investigated sequencing data from the whole blood of women with PD and matched healthy controls, obtained from the Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (https://www.ppmi-info.org/accessdata-specimens/download-data (accessed on 1 March 2021); updated information on the PPMI study is available at www.ppmi-info.org). In order to compare the PD cohort to our FMS and control cohort results, we only used blood samples drawn from female PD patients and controls who matched the following criteria: (1) Samples were taken at the baseline time point of the study, (2) patients were not taking any PD-related medication, (3) their age was ≤65 years, and (4) participants were from idiopathic (sporadic) PD and the control cohorts only. The Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) was applied, and the item 1.9 pain and other sensations were utilized as NRSPain impairment, with NRS = 0–1 as no pain-related impairment and NRS = 2–4 as pain-related impairment.
PPMI provided small RNA-sequencing data from whole blood samples of PD patients and of matched healthy controls that were collected by venous draws in PAXgene Vacutainer tubes (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). These were incubated at room temperature (18–25 °C) for 24 h before final storage at −80 °C. RNA was extracted using the PAXgene blood miRNA Kit protocol (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany; see details for RNA quality in Supplementary File S1).

2.2. Small RNA-Sequencing and miR Analysis

We subjected a randomized subset of 31 FMS and 17 control blood samples to small RNA-sequencing. For this purpose, 300 ng RNA per sample served for library preparation using the NEB-Next® Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (Index Primers 1-48; NEB-E7560S; New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) at the National Center for Genomic Technologies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. According to the information provided by the manufacturer, this kit contains a size selection step after PCR to ensure that only small RNAs up to 140 nt length are sequenced. Next generation short RNA-sequencing was conducted on an Illumina NextSeq 500, using two Illumina NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (75 Cycles) flow cells (20024906), with 24 samples each (all Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Quality control was performed using FastQC, version 0.11.8 [37]. Short RNA was aligned to the miRBase version 21 using miRExpress 2.0 with default parameters with no mismatches allowed [38,39]. We defined a miR as “CholinomiR”, if five or more cholinergic genes assessed by the previously published miR-targeting graph database (‘miRNet’) [40] were predicted targets of the respective miR. First, a minimum threshold of seven was applied for the prediction algorithm to define a targeting relationship towards a gene transcript and every DE miR. In the second step, miRs targeting more than four transcripts of a defined cholinergic gene list were termed CholinomiRs. To assess whether the found CholinomiRs were enriched in dysregulated FMS miRs, we compared their fraction against the fraction of detected, but not DE, miRs via Fisher’s exact test. The Cytoscape software (v.3.9.0) was used for visualization of the miR-gene target connections [41].
Regarding the PD disease control cohort, sequencing data was provided by PPMI. In summary, small RNA was sequenced at Hudson Alpha’s Genomic Services Lab on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 (San Diego, CA, USA). All samples were prepared using the Bioo smRNA library prep Kit (Bioo Scientific Corporation, Austin, TX, USA). Binary base calls were converted to FASTQ’s using Illumina bcltofastq v1.8.4, and FASTQ’s were merged and processed with miRMaster v1.0 [42]. To identify miRNAs, reads were mapped to miRBase v22 precursors with Bowtie 1.1.2 and were processed with miRMaster to allow up to 1 mismatch and 2 nt overlap at the 5′ end and 5 nt overlap at the 3′ end of the miRNA annotation [43,44]. The complete PPMI study information, including sample collection and other clinical protocols, is available at https://www.ppmi-info.org/ (accessed on 1 March 2021).

2.3. Validation of miR and mRNA Transcripts

For reverse transcription of miRs, we used the miRCURY LNA RT Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A total of 10 ng RNA in 2 µL nuclease-free water was added to a mix containing 2 µL reaction buffer, 5 µL nuclease-free water, and 1 µL enzyme mix. Reactions were performed on a PRISM 7700 Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) under the following conditions: reverse transcription (42 °C, 60 min) and enzyme deactivation (95 °C, 5 min). For mRNA, TaqMan Reverse Transcription reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used. For each sample, 250 ng mRNA was pre-incubated with 5 µL random hexamer at 85 °C for 3 min, followed by reverse transcription in a reaction mix, containing 10 μL 10× PCR buffer, 6.25 μL multiscribe reverse transcriptase, 2 μL RNase inhibitor, 22 μL MgCl2, and 20 μL deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate. Reactions were performed on a PRISM 7700 Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) under the following conditions: annealing (25 °C, 10 min), reverse transcription (48 °C, 60 min), and enzyme inactivation (95 °C, 5 min). Transcribed cDNA was stored at −20 °C before further analysis.
A QPCR of miR and mRNA targets was carried out on a QuantStudio 3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using the ΔΔCt method for relative quantification. The miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and pre-designed miRCURY LNA miR PCR Assays (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) were applied for each miR (see list of primers in Table 1). Following a dual selection approach, we included ten transcripts as potential endogenous controls for small RNAs. SNORD38B, SNORD44, SNORD48, 5S RNA, and hsa-miR-221-3p were selected from the literature. Furthermore, miRs with a mean base read level of >1000 reads within the small RNA-sequencing dataset were selected by their intra- and intergroup stability, assessed by NormFinder [45], identifying hsa-miR-942-5p, hsa-miR-194-5p, miR-93-5p, miR92a-3p, and miR423-5p as candidates. Twelve random CTR and FMS samples were used for validation via qRT-PCR. SNORD38B, SNORD44, SNORD48, and miR-423-5p were selected as suitable endogenous controls, based on Ct intergroup comparability and on standard deviation and range across all samples. To minimize the risk of a potentially skewed normalization by only one endogenous control, we normalized against the combined geometric mean of these four transcripts. Each well contained 5 µL 2× miRCURY SYBR Green Master Mix with 1 µL ROX per 50 µL, 1 µL primer, and 4 µL of 1:80 diluted cDNA. Functionality and specificity of SYBR green-based primers were checked via a melting curve step assessment. Gene expression analysis was performed with TaqMan qRT-PCR reagents (all Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with pre-designed Assays using RPL13A as an endogenous control. Each well contained 0.5 µL nuclease free water, 5 µL Fast Advanced Mastermix, 0.5 µL RPL13A primer, 0.5 µL target primer, and 3.5 µL cDNA.

2.4. Cholinesterase Activity Assay

From a randomly selected subset of study participants (FMS, n = 29; CTR, n = 11), the cholinergic status in serum samples was analyzed via Ellman’s assay [46]. The thawed serum samples were diluted 1:6 in PBS and incubated with Ellman solution containing 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, with pH 7.4 and 0.5 mM 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). For acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity, 10 mM of the specific inhibitor tetraisopropyl pyrophosphoramide (iso-OMPA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added at 1:200 dilution in Ellman’s solution to block butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activity. Samples were incubated for 90 min at room temperature. After adding the substrate acetylthiocholine (ATCh) in a final concentration of 1 mM, kinetic measurements were performed at 37 °C and 405 nm wavelength using a Tecan Spark microplate reader (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland). The activities of each sample were measured in triplicates and were repeated once. To diminish potential intra-test differences, each microtiter plate contained an in-house control triplicate of recombinant human AChE and BChE enzymes. Raw data were collected in units of “mean optical density (OD)/minute” and were processed as activity in nmol ATCh hydrolyzed/min/mL according to the Beer–Lambert law (A = εlc; molar absorptivity constant ε 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoate = 13,600), and they were multiplied by 6, accounting for the serum dilution factor.

2.5. Statistical Analysis and Visualization

Differential expression (DE) analysis of the transcriptomic profiles from the FMS cohort was performed using the “DESeq2” package via R platform [47,48]. Differences were assumed statistically significant at p < 0.05 after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, and data were filtered for a total count > 300 across all samples. DE analysis of the PPMI PD cohort was conducted in the same manner in DESeq2. Counts per million (CPM) measurements for downstream analysis were calculated using the edgeR R package [49,50]. Principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discrimination analysis (LDA) were performed in R using the “stats” “MASS” packages accordingly, as well as the graphic packages “ggfortify”, “ggplot2”, and “ggConvexHull” [48,51,52,53,54]. Briefly, PCA components (PCs) were based on finding the biggest variability between samples, whereas LDA components (LDs) explored the biggest variability between the known groups (FMS_mild_imp, FMS_severe_imp, and control).
For data derived from qRT-PCR, correlations, and Ellman’s assay, SPSS 27 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for analysis and was plotted in GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) for visualization. The Mann–Whitney U Test was used for comparison of two groups, and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for correlations. When appropriate, Holm–Sidak post correction was applied. Furthermore, the open-source vector software Inkscape V 0.92 (https://inkscape.org (accessed on 12 March 2018)) was used, and graphical icons were integrated from Smart Servier Medical Art https://smart.servier.com/ (accessed on 21 December 2021)) under the CC BY 3.0 license for visualization.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics

The main clinical characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 2.

3.2. Identification and Characterization of Systemic CholinomiRs in FMS

Small RNA-seq of women with FMS (n = 31) versus female healthy controls (n = 17) (Figure 2A) revealed 26 down- and 43 up-regulated miRs. Assessment of miR-mRNA targeting relations connected to cholinergic genes [35] identified 19 altered CholinomiRs within the dataset (Figure 2B).
The FMS-modulated CholinomiRs included upregulation of hsa-miR-374a-5p, -9-5p, -182-5p, -548d-5p, -454-3p, -183-5p, -101-3p, -148a-3p, -7-5p, -128-3p, -186-5p, and -27b-3p. Hsa-miR-532-3p, -328-3p, -766-3p, -1275, -625-5p, -671-5p, and -3609 showed downregulation in FMS blood samples (Figure 2B). In general, upregulated CholinomiRs from Tempus-tube-derived RNA showed higher reads compared to downregulated ones (Figure 2C). Since these RNA samples contained mRNA and small RNA from the whole variety of blood cells, we used an open database to assign our CholinomiRs to subtypes of nucleated white blood cells (WBC) and to red blood cells (RBC). Low frequency transcripts referred predominantly to single or few cell types. For instance, hsa-miR-548d-5p was restricted to monocytes, and hsa-miR-3609 was abundant only in CD4+ T cells. Hsa-miR-183-5p was restricted to RBC, but it exhibited one of the highest expression profiles across the sequenced samples (Figure 2B,C). Furthermore, CholinomiRs with stronger upregulation and more copies, reflected in higher counts such as hsa-miR-182-5p, hsa-miR-148a-3p, or hsa-miR-101-3p, were more broadly expressed according to the microRNA catalogue of human peripheral blood (http://134.245.63.235/ikmb-tools/bloodmiRs (accessed on 02 December 2021)). The larger fraction of CholinomiRs was upregulated and also connected to a higher number of cholinergic targets, potentially having more impact on the cholinergic system.

3.3. CholinomiR Signature Is Pain-Related and FMS-Specific

A comparison of ratios between detected CholinomiRs within the set of DE (19 of 69; 27.5%) and not DE miRs (68 of 474; 14.3%) revealed enrichment of dysregulated CholinomiRs in FMS, indicating that the observed signature in whole blood RNA is not random (p = 0.008; Fishers’s exact test). To evaluate the relevance of our CholinomiR subset for discriminating FMS patients from CTR, we compared the PCA pattern of all DE miRs to a PCA focusing on the 19 FMS-modulated CholinomiRs. The general PCA poorly differentiated both cohorts, and our CholinomiR-specific PCA yielded a slightly improved separation (Figure 3). When stratifying the group for the degree of daily life impairment due to pain in FMS and subjecting three groups to LDA, we achieved better discrimination from controls for all DE miRs as variables. This was further enhanced by applying only CholinomiRs as variables, distinguishing FMS with high daily life impairment without overlap versus the controls. Notably, only one FMS patient with low pain-related daily life impairment dispersed towards controls, and one dispersed towards the firmly impaired FMS subgroup (Figure 3).
Next, we asked if our CholinomiR signature is FMS-specific or if it reflects pain that may accompany other chronic diseases that involve immune-related alterations. For this purpose, we compared our findings with those of small RNA-seq of whole blood samples obtained from female PD patients (n = 92) versus female CTR (n = 47). Notably, 13 out of the 19 CholinomiRs determined in FMS patients were also detected in this analysis, affirming their expression in blood (Figure 4A). However, these CholinomiRs were not dysregulated in PD, and only hsa-miR-128-3p showed a trend towards downregulation (Figure 4B) in contrast to upregulation in FMS.
Pain is a relevant non-motor symptom in PD with significant impacts on patients’ health-related quality of life [56]. Therefore, we applied our FMS CholinomiR signature in blood samples of PD patients as a predictor of pain-related everyday life impairment. Hsa-miR-625-5p showed a trend towards downregulation in PD patients who reported pain-related impairment (Figure 4C), in line with the downregulation observed in FMS. We also correlated CholinomiR expression with FMS patients’ pain levels and found that hsa-miR-27b-3p (r = 0.373; p = 0.039) and hsa-miR-148a-3p (r = 0.362; p = 0.045) moderately correlated with NRSPain within the FMS cohort (Figure 4D,E). Taken together, these observations indicate biological relevance of CholinomiR alterations in FMS, distinct from PD patients, and hint towards an association with pain.

3.4. CholinomiR Hsa-miR-182-5p Is Upregulated in Women with FMS Compared to Healthy Controls

To experimentally validate our sequencing approach, we quantified hsa-miR-182-5p levels, using four selected small RNA transcripts as endogenous controls (Figure 5A). This broadly expressed CholinomiR showed a relatively strong upregulation (log2fold = 0.76) in small RNA-seq, revealing a twofold upregulation (median increase = 1.93) in FMS patients compared to CTR via qRT-PCR in our entire cohort (Figure 5B).

3.5. Female FMS Patients Inherit a Dense CholinomiR-Gene Transcript Network

The previously published miR-targeting graph database ‘miRNet’ allowed in-depth exploration of the CholinomiR-gene transcript network by integrating publicly available validated and predicted miR-gene interaction datasets [40]. Our analysis revealed 47 potential cholinergic targets and 118 miR-mRNA interactions (Figure 6) with upregulated cholinergic miRs, forming 80 connections compared to 38 connections of downregulated miRs (for details see Supplementary File S2).
Correspondingly, the miR-mRNA network showed a collective regulation of a subset of transcripts mostly targeted by upregulated miRs. Examples include bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2), linked to ten CholinomiRs (eight upregulated, two downregulated), RAR-related orphan receptor A (RORA) with seven connections (six upregulated, one downregulated), and interleukin 6 cytokine family signal transducer (IL6ST) with five upregulated CholinomiR connections, together indicating general downregulation of these transcripts. In contrast, the cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 2 subunit (CHRNB2) was a predicted target of only downregulated CholinomiRs. Lastly, acetylcholinesterase (AChE), a key enzyme for cholinergic signaling via breakdown of acetylcholine, was equally linked to three up- and three downregulated CholinomiRs (Figure 6). We compared our candidate gene list with an online mRNA sequencing dataset derived from healthy donor blood RNA, from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) project [57] (RNA HPA blood cell gene data; https://www.proteinatlas.org/about/download (accessed on 27 February 2022)) to assess the expression profile of these miR targets across single immune cell subtypes (see Supplementary File S3). With 61.7% (29/47 genes), natural killer (NK) cells expressed the highest number of mRNA targets, followed by neutrophils with 57.5% (27/47), whereas myeloid dendritic cells showed the lowest numbers of detected mRNA targets at 44.7% (21/47). Among the top-targeted transcripts, BMPR2, IL6ST, RORA, and NR1D2 were expressed in almost all cell types, whereas ACHE and BDNF expression was not detected in this dataset. However, RBC was not included in the HPA dataset, which represents a large fraction of Tempus-tube-derived RNA, and no disease-associated immune cell data are included.

3.6. Downregulation of Highly Targeted Cholinergic Gene Transcripts

To assess the direct influence of CholinomiRs on cholinergic transcript levels, we performed qRT-PCR with eleven associated target genes: BMPR2, IL6ST, RORA, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 2 (NR1D2), AChE, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), bone morphogenetic protein 3 (BMP3), serine and arginine rich splicing factor 6 (SRSF6), cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 4 subunit (CHRNA4), and cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 2 subunit (CHRNB2). Low numbers of CHRNA4 and CHRNB2 mRNA transcripts in whole blood RNA did not allow comparisons between FMS and CTR via qRT-PCR and were excluded from analysis. Within the group of cholinergic transcripts with five or more associated upregulated CholinomiRs, BMPR2 and IL6ST were downregulated (Figure 7B,C) in FMS, whereas RORA and NR1D2 expression levels were similar between FMS and CTR (Figure 7D,E). None of the other investigated transcripts were altered in FMS compared to CTR (Figure 7F–J).

3.7. Unchanged Cholinesterase Activity in FMS

Although not altered at the transcriptional level in FMS, we considered that AChE may be affected in FMS at the protein level, indicated by altered enzyme activity. The availability and concentration of acetylcholine (ACh) as the ligand of cholinergic signaling depends on its degradation by AChE and BChE. Hence, we measured the activity of total cholinesterases as well as AChE and BChE specific activity in serum samples of FMS patients. Notably, FMS and CTR serum exhibited similar levels of both total and AChE- or BChE-specific hydrolytic activity (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

We performed a detailed profiling of CholinomiRs in whole blood samples of patients with FMS and compared our data to healthy and disease controls. We found moderate DE of 69 miRs, including 19 cholinergic miRs that distinguished FMS from the investigated control groups and that may modulate downstream gene expression. CholinomiRs play an important role in orchestrating immune-related responses in neurodegenerative diseases, depression, and inflammatory disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease [58,59,60,61]. Only few studies have investigated miR levels in FMS blood so far. Two studies used serum, whereas one report focused on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Their approaches relied on miRNA microarrays with varying panels, a smaller sample size, and a single set of hybridization conditions, compromising the outcome of these tests [62,63,64]. Less than ten DE miRs were identified in each study, without overlap between studies, and none of the CholinomiRs we present here was reported. Hence, our small RNA-seq represents the first comprehensive and unbiased survey of miR expression in FMS.
Mapping our CholinomiRs to blood cell types revealed dysregulation of commonly expressed CholinomiRs, such as hsa-miR-27b-3p, hsa-miR-148a-3p, and hsa-miR-182-5p, but also that of cell-type-specific miRs, such as hsa-miR-3609 in CD4+ T cells or hsa-miR-548d-5p in CD14+ monocytes. CholinomiR dysregulation in FMS was nonrandom, and highly abundant members tended to be upregulated.
Focusing on DE CholinomiRs improved separation between FMS and healthy control groups, especially via LDA and subgrouping between low and high pain-related impairment in daily life. To evaluate whether our CholinomiR signature referred to a general pattern in chronic diseases with suspected immune-related component, we cross-examined expression of our CholinomiRs in female PD patients of comparable age. Intriguingly, FMS presented a strikingly higher and clearer overall DE of CholinomiRs than PD, in which only hsa-miR-128-3p showed a trend towards reduced expression compared to controls, inverse to its upregulation in FMS. Hsa-miR-128-3p is involved in the neuronal oxidative stress response via interaction with the circular RNA circSLC8A1, which blocks its functioning and modulates the process of nonsense-mediated RNA decay [65,66,67]. PD patients with pain-related impairment showed a tendency towards hsa-miR-625-5p downregulation, inverse to its upregulation in FMS, hinting towards opposed pain-related function. In FMS, hsa-miR-148a-3p and 27b-3p positively correlated with pain intensities, indicating a putative association with pain severity. Interestingly, hsa-miR-27b-3p is implicated with inflammatory modulation of toll-like receptors [68]. Although we do not define a “unique” FMS CholinomiR signature, comparisons with healthy and disease controls may indicate distinct small-RNA-mediated mechanisms of pain in FMS and PD. Pain phenotypes, perceptions, and methodological assessments of pain substantially vary across individuals and between diseases. The exact roles of these candidate miRs in different pain conditions needs to be investigated in future studies with respective patient cohorts.
Validating our RNA-seq results, qRT-PCR confirmed the upregulation of hsa-miR-182-5p in FMS. This miR targets, e.g., BDNF, which predominantly derives from the central nervous system, but it is also secreted by activated immune cells and acts as a positive regulator of survival and differentiation of PNS and CNS neurons [69]. Reduced blood levels of BDNF have been reported in major depression (MD), and depressed mood is a frequent co-morbidity in FMS [3,70]. However, contrary to MD, some studies reported increased serum BDNF levels in FMS patients [71,72], whereas others did not find any deregulation [73], which obscures its role in FMS pathology. Our study exclusively focuses on blood RNA expression, leaving our findings hinting towards a potential lack of BDNF deregulation speculative. Hsa-miR-182-5p is also associated with NR1D2, which is a gene involved in circadian rhythmicity and which regulates lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses [74,75]. CholinomiRs also targeted RORA and Clock Circadian Regulators as further members of the circadian rhythm gene family. Intriguingly, circulation of leukocytes oscillates in a diurnal manner, and amplification of the circadian expression of pro-inflammatory mediators is known in chronic diseases [76]. As an example, the circadian regulator cortisol modulates T-cell activity and is assumed to play a role in FMS pathophysiology [77,78,79]. CholinomiR-gene transcript networks predicted further relevant candidates of immune regulation. BMPR2 and several BMPs are involved in NK activation and autoimmunity as part of the TGFβ superfamily [80,81,82]. IL6ST mediates immune responses by binding to other receptors, such as IL-6R, forming high-affinity receptor complexes [83].
We investigated these key mRNA transcripts targeted by CholinomiRs of interest via qRT-PCR in our whole blood samples. Indeed, BMPR2 and IL6ST levels were reduced in FMS patients in accordance with the miRs most prominent role of post-transcriptional repressors. The membrane receptors BMPR2 and IL6ST are pivotal components of the TGFβ-superfamily-mediated SMAD (BMPR2) and the IL-6-family-mediated JAK–STAT (IL6ST) pathways [84]. In general, the activation of IL-6-mediated pathways exerts pro-inflammatory cellular responses [83]. BMP signaling can be bidirectional, dependent on ligand–receptor combination and the respective cell [80,85], however, a link with autoimmunity is suspected, e.g., in multiple sclerosis, and BMPs can promote Th17 proliferation while suppressing T-reg cell generation [86,87]. Although further validation of our data is mandatory by investigating larger patient samples, CholinomiRs may act on BMPR2 and IL6ST in a compensatory manner to confine underlying pro-inflammatory processes in FMS. Investigated circadian transcripts RORA and NR1D2 and transcripts targeted by fewer miRs or connected to both up- and downregulated CholinomiRs, such as AChE and BDNF, were not altered in whole blood. Accordingly, serum AChE activity was sustained in FMS patients compared to controls. Together, this indicates that the observed CholinomiRs modifications may serve to maintain a balanced system.
Traditional screening approaches failed to identify robust pro-inflammatory “signatures” or precise immune-related pathways in FMS [27,28]. However, recent advances with in-depth analyses have revealed immune and neuro-immune mechanisms as potentially involved in FMS pathophysiology. Passive transfer experiments and cell culture incubation along with immunoreaction in tissue sections indicated binding of FMS patient-derived IgG at the dorsal root ganglion level, representing a neuro-inflammatory component via the humoral system [8]. Moreover, a switch from circulating to resident hyper-responsive natural killer (NK) cells in FMS may participate in peripheral neurodegeneration [88]. Both NK activation and autoimmunity are linked to BMP signaling, e.g., via an autocrine activation pathway via BMP receptors and BMP ligands in NK cells [80,81,82], which fits our identified target genes BMP1, BMP2, BMP3, BMP7, BMP6, BMPER, BMPR1B, and, most importantly, BMPR2. Finally, changes in monocyte subtype distribution and amplified p38 MAPK/MK2 axis activity may be associated with FMS [89,90]. In this respect, monocyte-specific hsa-miR-9-5p and globally expressed hsa-miR-101-3p both target JAK2, which is pivotal for IL6/JAK2/STAT3 axis-mediated inflammation. Taken together, CholinomiRs may shift inflammatory processes via modulation of the systemic cholinergic system.
From the clinical point of view, our findings give further evidence for a distinct pathophysiology of FMS and draw attention to its links with the cholinergic system. Indeed, the anticholinergic drug amitriptyline is one of the first-line pharmacological treatment options for FMS patients [91,92]. Although we cannot rule out a potential effect of CholinomiRs on the individual response of FMS patients to anticholinergic medication, since only three (for small RNA-seq) and six (for qRT-PCR) FMS patients were on low dosages of amitriptyline (Table 1), we believe that this aspect deserves consideration in future studies. Given the individually diverse effects and side effects of amitriptyline in FMS, we speculate that a pathophysiological link to distinct CholinomiRs and related pathways may be possible.

5. Limitations

Analysis of circulating miRs from serum or plasma can be severely distorted by hemolysis during preparation [93], and little information can be drawn on source or effector cells. Blood sample processing and isolation of PBMC prior to analysis affects gene regulation within hours and may affect miR transcription even more rapidly [94,95,96]. In contrast, our approach allowed us to create a direct snap shot of the transcriptomic state, since all cells were immediately lysed and total RNA was stabilized [97]. However, several limitations must be addressed. Our assignment of miRs towards particular blood cell types relied on a database mapping approach and was not directly assessed. Only FMS patients with normal routine blood assessment results were included [35] to avoid conditions in which aberrant miR expression patterns may be affected by blood cell distributions, but we did not analyze single blood cell type percentages. Finally, expression changes of targets restricted to a single blood cell subtype or transcripts diametrically regulated across blood cells subtypes are likely masked within global blood RNA and can therefore not be identified via qRT-PCR. Experiments with sorted blood cells are necessary to disentangle immune-related mechanisms in the pathophysiology of FMS related to CholinomiRs, which may be particularly relevant for the identified genes involved in circadian rhythmicity.
FMS and control blood was obtained via Tempus tubes, and PD patient and respective control blood collection employed the PAX system. Both systems rely on direct cell lysis and RNA stabilization; nevertheless, a previous study called for caution in cross-evaluation of expression levels between both systems [98]. To avoid fallacious conclusions, we only compared whether global deregulation of CholinomiRs was seen against their respective control cohort.
Importantly, small non-coding RNA regulators also comprise a recently introduced class of tRNA fragments (tRF) with diverse cellular roles, including mRNA repression, that can take over miR functions in a ‘changing of the guards’ manner [60,99]. Hence, to gain insight into the detailed small RNA landscape, tRF analysis needs to be addressed in future studies for both FMS and PD.

6. Conclusions

We investigated systemic blood CholinomiR signatures in women with FMS and compared our data with those of healthy controls and patients with PD associated with somatic pain as disease controls. CholinomiRs play an important role in neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases. In FMS subgroups, degeneration of peripheral small nerve fibers was observed, and inflammatory bowel disease and affective cognitive symptoms were common comorbidities. We found a distinct CholinomiR signature, which distinguishes FMS from healthy subjects and PD patients as disease controls and links these CholinomiRs with downstream immune-related mRNA transcripts. These findings provide evidence for miR regulation of immune cell processes in FMS with an emphasis on the systemic cholinergic system. Although the exact pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear, CholinomiRs emerge as important post-transcriptional regulators, which may mediate pathological pro-inflammatory or compensatory effects in immune cells of FMS patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11081276/s1, Supplementary File S1: RNA quality summary; Supplementary File S2: Scored CholinomiR-gene target list; Supplementary File S3: Expression profile of CholinomiR targets across blood immune cell subtypes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.Ü., D.S.G., C.S. and H.S.; methodology, C.E., S.V., G.M., D.S.G. and S.L.; software, S.L.; validation, N.Ü., D.S.G. and H.S.; formal analysis, C.E., S.V. and G.M.; investigation, C.E., S.V., G.M. and L.E.; resources, N.Ü. and H.S.; data curation, N.Ü., D.S.G., S.V., G.M. and H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.E., S.V., N.Ü. and H.S.; writing—review and editing, C.E., S.V., G.M., S.L., L.E., D.E., C.S., H.S. and N.Ü.; visualization, C.E. and S.V.; supervision, N.Ü. and H.S.; project administration, N.Ü.; funding acquisition, N.Ü. and H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG, UE171/4-1) and partly funded by Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2014_A129). N.Ü. was funded by DFG (UE171/15-1). The authors further acknowledge support from the Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology and Space, Grant No. 53140 and the Israel Science Foundation (ISF), Grant no. 1016/18 to H.S., as well as support from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research, Minerva fellowship to L.E. PPMI—a public-private partnership—is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and funding partners, including 4D Pharma, AbbVie Inc., AcureX Therapeutics, Allergan, Amathus Therapeutics, Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s (ASAP), Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Bial Biotech, Biogen, BioLegend, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calico Life Sciences LLC, Celgene Corporation, DaCapo Brainscience, Denali Therapeutics, The Edmond J. Safra Foundation, Eli Lilly and Company, GE Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Golub Capital, Handl Therapeutics, Insitro, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Merck & Co. Inc., Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC, Neurocrine Biosciences, Pfizer Inc., Piramal Imaging, Prevail Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and its affiliated company Genentech Inc., Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Teva Neuroscience Inc., UCB, Vanqua Bio, Verily Life Sciences, Voyager Therapeutics Inc., and Yumanity Therapeutics Inc.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Würzburg Medical Faculty (#121/14) on 15 September 2014. The use of human-derived samples at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem was approved by the Hebrew University’s Ethics committee.

Informed Consent Statement

All study participants gave written informed consent to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data (accessed on 1 March 2021)). For up-to-date information on the study, visit ppmi-info.org.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge excellent technical support from Franziska Karl-Schöller, Daniela Urlaub, and Danilo Prtvar during gene expression analysis at the Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg. The authors further acknowledge technical support for RNA sequencing from the team at the National Center for Genomic Technologies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. All listed individuals consented to the acknowledgments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wolfe, F.; Clauw, D.J.; Fitzcharles, M.-A.; Goldenberg, D.L.; Häuser, W.; Katz, R.L.; Mease, P.J.; Russell, A.S.; Russell, I.J.; Walitt, B. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2016, 46, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Queiroz, L.P. Worldwide epidemiology of fibromyalgia. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2013, 17, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weir, P.T.; Harlan, G.A.; Nkoy, F.L.; Jones, S.S.; Hegmann, K.T.; Gren, L.H.; Lyon, J.L. The incidence of fibromyalgia and its associated comorbidities: A population-based retrospective cohort study based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2006, 12, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wolfe, F.; Walitt, B.; Perrot, S.; Rasker, J.J.; Häuser, W. Fibromyalgia diagnosis and biased assessment: Sex, prevalence and bias. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Häuser, W.; Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Fitzcharles, M.-A. Fibromyalgia syndrome: Under-, over-and misdiagnosis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2019, 37, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Littlejohn, G.; Guymer, E. Neurogenic inflammation in fibromyalgia. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018, 40, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rodriguez-Pintó, I.; Agmon-Levin, N.; Howard, A.; Shoenfeld, Y. Fibromyalgia and cytokines. Immunol. Lett. 2014, 161, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goebel, A.; Krock, E.; Gentry, C.; Israel, M.R.; Jurczak, A.; Urbina, C.M.; Sandor, K.; Vastani, N.; Maurer, M.; Cuhadar, U. Passive transfer of fibromyalgia symptoms from patients to mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e144201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dolcino, M.; Tinazzi, E.; Puccetti, A.; Lunardi, C. Gene expression profiling in fibromyalgia indicates an autoimmune origin of the disease and opens new avenues for targeted therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, D.-J.; Lee, S.-S. New insights into the genetics of fibromyalgia. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2017, 32, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. van Tilburg, M.A.; Parisien, M.; Boles, R.G.; Drury, G.L.; Smith-Voudouris, J.; Verma, V.; Khoury, S.; Chabot-Doré, A.-J.; Nackley, A.G.; Smith, S.B. A genetic polymorphism that is associated with mitochondrial energy metabolism increases risk of fibromyalgia. Pain 2020, 161, 2860–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Benlidayi, I.C. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis and treatment of fibromyalgia. Rheumatol. Int. 2019, 39, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grayston, R.; Czanner, G.; Elhadd, K.; Goebel, A.; Frank, B.; Üçeyler, N.; Malik, R.A.; Alam, U. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of small fiber pathology in fibromyalgia: Implications for a new paradigm in fibromyalgia etiopathogenesis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 48, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Üçeyler, N.; Zeller, D.; Kahn, A.-K.; Kewenig, S.; Kittel-Schneider, S.; Schmid, A.; Casanova-Molla, J.; Reiners, K.; Sommer, C. Small fibre pathology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Brain 2013, 136, 1857–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Martínez-Martínez, L.-A.; Mora, T.; Vargas, A.; Fuentes-Iniestra, M.; Martínez-Lavín, M. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction in fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and interstitial cystitis: A review of case-control studies. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2014, 20, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Solano, C.; Martinez, A.; Becerril, L.; Vargas, A.; Figueroa, J.; Navarro, C.; Ramos-Remus, C.; Martinez-Lavin, M. Autonomic dysfunction in fibromyalgia assessed by the Composite Autonomic Symptoms Scale (COMPASS). J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2009, 15, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wolfe, F.; Clauw, D.J.; Fitzcharles, M.A.; Goldenberg, D.L.; Katz, R.S.; Mease, P.; Russell, A.S.; Russell, I.J.; Winfield, J.B.; Yunus, M.B. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res. 2010, 62, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tracey, K.J. The inflammatory reflex. Nature 2002, 420, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pavlov, V.A.; Tracey, K.J. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Brain Behav. Immun. 2005, 19, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ofek, K.; Soreq, H. Cholinergic involvement and manipulation approaches in multiple system disorders. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2013, 203, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kawashima, K.; Fujii, T.; Moriwaki, Y.; Misawa, H. Critical roles of acetylcholine and the muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the regulation of immune function. Life Sci. 2012, 91, 1027–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fujii, T.; Mashimo, M.; Moriwaki, Y.; Misawa, H.; Ono, S.; Horiguchi, K.; Kawashima, K. Expression and function of the cholinergic system in immune cells. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Rosas-Ballina, M.; Tracey, K. Cholinergic control of inflammation. J. Intern. Med. 2009, 265, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fujii, T.; Mashimo, M.; Moriwaki, Y.; Misawa, H.; Ono, S.; Horiguchi, K.; Kawashima, K. Physiological functions of the cholinergic system in immune cells. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 134, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wåhlén, K.; Ernberg, M.; Kosek, E.; Mannerkorpi, K.; Gerdle, B.; Ghafouri, B. Significant correlation between plasma proteome profile and pain intensity, sensitivity, and psychological distress in women with fibromyalgia. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Martins, D.F.; Viseux, F.J.; Salm, D.C.; Ribeiro, A.C.A.; da Silva, H.K.L.; Seim, L.A.; Bittencourt, E.B.; Bianco, G.; Moré, A.O.O.; Reed, W.R. The role of the vagus nerve in fibromyalgia syndrome. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 131, 1136–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Üçeyler, N.; Häuser, W.; Sommer, C. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Cytokines in fibromyalgia syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2011, 12, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. O’Mahony, L.F.; Srivastava, A.; Mehta, P.; Ciurtin, C. Is fibromyalgia associated with a unique cytokine profile? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology 2021, 60, 2602–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vishnoi, A.; Rani, S. MiRNA Biogenesis and Regulation of Diseases: An Overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1509, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fabian, M.R.; Sonenberg, N.; Filipowicz, W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79, 351–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Andersen, H.H.; Duroux, M.; Gazerani, P. MicroRNAs as modulators and biomarkers of inflammatory and neuropathic pain conditions. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 71, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Soreq, H. Checks and balances on cholinergic signaling in brain and body function. Trends Neurosci. 2015, 38, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Meydan, C.; Shenhar-Tsarfaty, S.; Soreq, H. MicroRNA regulators of anxiety and metabolic disorders. Trends Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 798–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nadorp, B.; Soreq, H. Predicted overlapping microRNA regulators of acetylcholine packaging and degradation in neuroinflammation-related disorders. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2014, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Evdokimov, D.; Frank, J.; Klitsch, A.; Unterecker, S.; Warrings, B.; Serra, J.; Papagianni, A.; Saffer, N.; Meyer zu Altenschildesche, C.; Kampik, D. Reduction of skin innervation is associated with a severe fibromyalgia phenotype. Ann. Neurol. 2019, 86, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Von Korff, M.; Ormel, J.; Keefe, F.J.; Dworkin, S.F. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992, 50, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 3 April 2022).
  38. Griffiths-Jones, S.; Saini, H.K.; Van Dongen, S.; Enright, A.J. miRBase: Tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 36, D154–D158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, W.-C.; Lin, F.-M.; Chang, W.-C.; Lin, K.-Y.; Huang, H.-D.; Lin, N.-S. miRExpress: Analyzing high-throughput sequencing data for profiling microRNA expression. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lobentanzer, S.; Hanin, G.; Klein, J.; Soreq, H. Integrative transcriptomics reveals sexually dimorphic control of the cholinergic/neurokine interface in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 764–777.e765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fehlmann, T.; Backes, C.; Kahraman, M.; Haas, J.; Ludwig, N.; Posch, A.E.; Würstle, M.L.; Hübenthal, M.; Franke, A.; Meder, B. Web-based NGS data analysis using miRMaster: A large-scale meta-analysis of human miRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 8731–8744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kozomara, A.; Birgaoanu, M.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: From microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D155–D162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Langmead, B.; Trapnell, C.; Pop, M.; Salzberg, S.L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Andersen, C.L.; Jensen, J.L.; Ørntoft, T.F. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: A model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 5245–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres Jr, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019; Available online: https://www.scirp.org/(S(lz5mqp453edsnp55rrgjct55))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2631126 (accessed on 3 April 2022).
  49. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. McCarthy, D.J.; Chen, Y.; Smyth, G.K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 4288–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Venables, W.; Ripley, B. Modern Applied Statistics; Fourth, S., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tang, Y.; Horikoshi, M.; Li, W. ggfortify: Unified interface to visualize statistical results of popular R packages. R J. 2016, 8, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/citation.html (accessed on 27 February 2022).
  54. Martin, C. ggConvexHull: Add a Convex Hull Geom to ggplot2. R Package Version 0.1. 0 2017. Available online: http://github.com/cmartin/ggConvexHull (accessed on 27 February 2022).
  55. Juzenas, S.; Venkatesh, G.; Hübenthal, M.; Hoeppner, M.P.; Du, Z.G.; Paulsen, M.; Rosenstiel, P.; Senger, P.; Hofmann-Apitius, M.; Keller, A. A comprehensive, cell specific microRNA catalogue of human peripheral blood. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 9290–9301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Buhmann, C.; Wrobel, N.; Grashorn, W.; Fruendt, O.; Wesemann, K.; Diedrich, S.; Bingel, U. Pain in Parkinson disease: A cross-sectional survey of its prevalence, specifics, and therapy. J. Neurol. 2017, 264, 758–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Uhlen, M.; Karlsson, M.J.; Zhong, W.; Tebani, A.; Pou, C.; Mikes, J.; Lakshmikanth, T.; Forsström, B.; Edfors, F.; Odeberg, J. A genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of protein-coding genes in human blood cells. Science 2019, 366, eaax9198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Maharshak, N.; Shenhar-Tsarfaty, S.; Aroyo, N.; Orpaz, N.; Guberman, I.; Canaani, J.; Halpern, Z.; Dotan, I.; Berliner, S.; Soreq, H. MicroRNA-132 modulates cholinergic signaling and inflammation in human inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013, 19, 1346–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Simchovitz, A.; Heneka, M.T.; Soreq, H. Personalized genetics of the cholinergic blockade of neuroinflammation. J. Neurochem. 2017, 142, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Winek, K.; Lobentanzer, S.; Nadorp, B.; Dubnov, S.; Dames, C.; Jagdmann, S.; Moshitzky, G.; Hotter, B.; Meisel, C.; Greenberg, D.S. Transfer RNA fragments replace microRNA regulators of the cholinergic poststroke immune blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 32606–32616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dagytė, G.; Den Boer, J.A.; Trentani, A. The cholinergic system and depression. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 221, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cerdá-Olmedo, G.; Mena-Durán, A.V.; Monsalve, V.; Oltra, E. Identification of a MicroRNA Signature for the Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Masotti, A.; Baldassarre, A.; Guzzo, M.P.; Iannuccelli, C.; Barbato, C.; Di Franco, M. Circulating microRNA profiles as liquid biopsies for the characterization and diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 7129–7136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bjersing, J.L.; Bokarewa, M.I.; Mannerkorpi, K. Profile of circulating microRNAs in fibromyalgia and their relation to symptom severity: An exploratory study. Rheumatol. Int. 2015, 35, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bruno, I.G.; Karam, R.; Huang, L.; Bhardwaj, A.; Lou, C.H.; Shum, E.Y.; Song, H.-W.; Corbett, M.A.; Gifford, W.D.; Gecz, J. Identification of a microRNA that activates gene expression by repressing nonsense-mediated RNA decay. Mol. Cell 2011, 42, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Popp, M.W.; Maquat, L.E. Attenuation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay facilitates the response to chemotherapeutics. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Hanan, M.; Simchovitz, A.; Yayon, N.; Vaknine, S.; Cohen-Fultheim, R.; Karmon, M.; Madrer, N.; Rohrlich, T.M.; Maman, M.; Bennett, E.R. A Parkinson’s disease Circ RNA s Resource reveals a link between circ SLC 8A1 and oxidative stress. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e11942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. O’neill, L.A.; Sheedy, F.J.; McCoy, C.E. MicroRNAs: The fine-tuners of Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kerschensteiner, M.; Gallmeier, E.; Behrens, L.; Leal, V.V.; Misgeld, T.; Klinkert, W.E.; Kolbeck, R.; Hoppe, E.; Oropeza-Wekerle, R.-L.; Bartke, I. Activated human T cells, B cells, and monocytes produce brain-derived neurotrophic factor in vitro and in inflammatory brain lesions: A neuroprotective role of inflammation? J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Lee, B.-H.; Kim, Y.-K. The roles of BDNF in the pathophysiology of major depression and in antidepressant treatment. Psychiatry Investig. 2010, 7, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nugraha, B.; Korallus, C.; Gutenbrunner, C. Serum level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in fibromyalgia syndrome correlates with depression but not anxiety. Neurochem. Int. 2013, 62, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Laske, C.; Stransky, E.; Eschweiler, G.W.; Klein, R.; Wittorf, A.; Leyhe, T.; Richartz, E.; Köhler, N.; Bartels, M.; Buchkremer, G. Increased BDNF serum concentration in fibromyalgia with or without depression or antidepressants. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2007, 41, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Baumeister, D.; Eich, W.; Saft, S.; Geisel, O.; Hellweg, R.; Finn, A.; Svensson, C.I.; Tesarz, J. No evidence for altered plasma NGF and BDNF levels in fibromyalgia patients. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ramakrishnan, S.N.; Muscat, G.E. The orphan Rev-erb nuclear receptors: A link between metabolism, circadian rhythm and inflammation? Nucl. Recept. Signal. 2006, 4, e009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Gibbs, J.E.; Blaikley, J.; Beesley, S.; Matthews, L.; Simpson, K.D.; Boyce, S.H.; Farrow, S.N.; Else, K.J.; Singh, D.; Ray, D.W. The nuclear receptor REV-ERBα mediates circadian regulation of innate immunity through selective regulation of inflammatory cytokines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Scheiermann, C.; Kunisaki, Y.; Frenette, P.S. Circadian control of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Dimitrov, S.; Benedict, C.; Heutling, D.; Westermann, J.; Born, J.; Lange, T. Cortisol and epinephrine control opposing circadian rhythms in T cell subsets. Blood 2009, 113, 5134–5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Crofford, L.J.; Young, E.A.; Engleberg, N.C.; Korszun, A.; Brucksch, C.B.; McClure, L.A.; Brown, M.B.; Demitrack, M.A. Basal circadian and pulsatile ACTH and cortisol secretion in patients with fibromyalgia and/or chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain Behav. Immun. 2004, 18, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Weissbecker, I.; Floyd, A.; Dedert, E.; Salmon, P.; Sephton, S. Childhood trauma and diurnal cortisol disruption in fibromyalgia syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2006, 31, 312–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chen, W.; Ten Dijke, P. Immunoregulation by members of the TGFβ superfamily. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 723–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Robson, N.C.; Hidalgo, L.; McAlpine, T.; Wei, H.; Martínez, V.G.; Entrena, A.; Melen, G.J.; MacDonald, A.S.; Phythian-Adams, A.; Sacedón, R. Optimal effector functions in human natural killer cells rely upon autocrine bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 5019–5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Eixarch, H.; Calvo-Barreiro, L.; Costa, C.; Reverter-Vives, G.; Castillo, M.; Gil, V.; Del Río, J.A.; Montalban, X.; Espejo, C. Inhibition of the BMP Signaling Pathway Ameliorated Established Clinical Symptoms of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. Neurotherapeutics 2020, 17, 1988–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jones, S.A.; Jenkins, B.J. Recent insights into targeting the IL-6 cytokine family in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 773–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Malemud, C.J.; Pearlman, E. Targeting JAK/STAT signaling pathway in inflammatory diseases. Curr. Signal Transduct. Ther. 2009, 4, 201–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Antebi, Y.E.; Linton, J.M.; Klumpe, H.; Bintu, B.; Gong, M.; Su, C.; McCardell, R.; Elowitz, M.B. Combinatorial signal perception in the BMP pathway. Cell 2017, 170, 1184–1196.e1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Eixarch, H.; Calvo-Barreiro, L.; Montalban, X.; Espejo, C. Bone morphogenetic proteins in multiple sclerosis: Role in neuroinflammation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 68, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Yoshioka, Y.; Ono, M.; Osaki, M.; Konishi, I.; Sakaguchi, S. Differential effects of inhibition of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signalling on T-cell activation and differentiation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012, 42, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Verma, V.; Drury, G.L.; Parisien, M.; Özdağ Acarli, A.N.; Al-Aubodah, T.A.; Nijnik, A.; Wen, X.; Tugarinov, N.; Verner, M.; Klares, R., 3rd; et al. Unbiased immune profiling reveals a natural killer cell-peripheral nerve axis in fibromyalgia. Pain 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Taylor, A.G.; Fischer-White, T.G.; Anderson, J.G.; Adelstein, K.E.; Murugesan, M.; Lewis, J.E.; Scott, M.M.; Gaykema, R.P.; Goehler, L.E. Stress, Inflammation and Pain: A Potential Role for Monocytes in Fibromyalgia-related Symptom Severity. Stress Health 2016, 32, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nugraha, B.; Scheibe, R.; Korallus, C.; Gaestel, M.; Gutenbrunner, C. The p38/MK2 Axis in Monocytes of Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patients: An Explorative Study. Medicina 2021, 57, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Moore, R.A.; Derry, S.; Aldington, D.; Cole, P.; Wiffen, P.J. Amitriptyline for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 12, Cd008242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Häuser, W.; Wolfe, F.; Tölle, T.; Üçeyler, N.; Sommer, C. The role of antidepressants in the management of fibromyalgia syndrome. CNS Drugs 2012, 26, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kirschner, M.B.; Edelman, J.J.B.; Kao, S.C.-H.; Vallely, M.P.; Van Zandwijk, N.; Reid, G. The impact of hemolysis on cell-free microRNA biomarkers. Front. Genet. 2013, 4, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Baechler, E.; Batliwalla, F.; Karypis, G.; Gaffney, P.; Moser, K.; Ortmann, W.; Espe, K.; Balasubramanian, S.; Hughes, K.; Chan, J. Expression levels for many genes in human peripheral blood cells are highly sensitive to ex vivo incubation. Genes Immun. 2004, 5, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. O’Connell, R.M.; Taganov, K.D.; Boldin, M.P.; Cheng, G.; Baltimore, D. MicroRNA-155 is induced during the macrophage inflammatory response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1604–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Simone, N.L.; Soule, B.P.; Ly, D.; Saleh, A.D.; Savage, J.E.; DeGraff, W.; Cook, J.; Harris, C.C.; Gius, D.; Mitchell, J.B. Ionizing radiation-induced oxidative stress alters miRNA expression. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. van der Sijde, F.; Li, Y.; Schraauwen, R.; de Koning, W.; van Eijck, C.H.; Mustafa, D.A. RNA from stabilized whole blood enables more comprehensive immune gene expression profiling compared to RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Asare, A.L.; Kolchinsky, S.A.; Gao, Z.; Wang, R.; Raddassi, K.; Bourcier, K.; Seyfert-Margolis, V. Differential gene expression profiles are dependent upon method of peripheral blood collection and RNA isolation. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Shen, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhu, L.; Li, T.; Yan, Z.; Guo, J. Transfer RNA-derived fragments and tRNA halves: Biogenesis, biological functions and their roles in diseases. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 96, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 11 01276 g001 550
Figure 1. Study workflow. Abbreviations: CTR, healthy control; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; PD, Parkinson’s disease; miR, microRNA; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR. Tempus blood, blood samples collected in Tempus™ Blood RNA Tubes; PAX blood, blood samples collected in PAXgene Vacutainer tubes. * For qRT-PCR either CTR (n = 15) versus FMS (n = 15) or CTR (n = 18) versus FMS (n = 29) samples were used.
Figure 1. Study workflow. Abbreviations: CTR, healthy control; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; PD, Parkinson’s disease; miR, microRNA; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR. Tempus blood, blood samples collected in Tempus™ Blood RNA Tubes; PAX blood, blood samples collected in PAXgene Vacutainer tubes. * For qRT-PCR either CTR (n = 15) versus FMS (n = 15) or CTR (n = 18) versus FMS (n = 29) samples were used.
Cells 11 01276 g001
Cells 11 01276 g002 550
Figure 2. Small RNA-sequencing reveals 19 DE blood CholinomiRs in female FMS patients. (A) Blood collected in Tempus tubes from female FMS patients and matched controls was used for small RNA-sequencing and miR analysis. (B) Volcano plot of altered miR levels in FMS normalized to CTR, and the horizontal line indicates FDA-corrected threshold for DE miRs. Unchanged miRs are in grey, DE miRs are in black, and DE CholinomiRs are in red. (C) Counts per million of respective CholinomiRs and log2Fold change compared to CTR. Diameter of dots code for the number of predicted cholinergic targets. (D) Assignment of CholinomiRs to blood cell subtypes; magenta indicates absence, and green indicates presence in blood cell type according to [55]. Abbreviations: CholinomiR, cholinergic-targeting microRNA; CPM, counts per million; CTR, healthy controls; DE, differentially expressed; FDA, false discovery rate; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; MC, monocyte; miR, microRNA; NK, natural killer cell; NT, neutrophil; RBC, red blood cell.
Figure 2. Small RNA-sequencing reveals 19 DE blood CholinomiRs in female FMS patients. (A) Blood collected in Tempus tubes from female FMS patients and matched controls was used for small RNA-sequencing and miR analysis. (B) Volcano plot of altered miR levels in FMS normalized to CTR, and the horizontal line indicates FDA-corrected threshold for DE miRs. Unchanged miRs are in grey, DE miRs are in black, and DE CholinomiRs are in red. (C) Counts per million of respective CholinomiRs and log2Fold change compared to CTR. Diameter of dots code for the number of predicted cholinergic targets. (D) Assignment of CholinomiRs to blood cell subtypes; magenta indicates absence, and green indicates presence in blood cell type according to [55]. Abbreviations: CholinomiR, cholinergic-targeting microRNA; CPM, counts per million; CTR, healthy controls; DE, differentially expressed; FDA, false discovery rate; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; MC, monocyte; miR, microRNA; NK, natural killer cell; NT, neutrophil; RBC, red blood cell.
Cells 11 01276 g002
Cells 11 01276 g003 550
Figure 3. PCA and LDA (principles visualized in grey graphs) for all DE miRs and only CholinomiRs. Although PCA shows only minor improvements in group separation when focusing on CholinomiRs, using LDA with three groups and CholinomiRs leads to high discrimination capacity between healthy controls and FMS patients with mild pain-related daily life impairment (FMS_mild_imp) and severely pain-related daily life impairment (FMS_severe_imp). Abbreviations: CTR, healthy control; DE, differentially expressed; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; PCA, principal component analysis.
Figure 3. PCA and LDA (principles visualized in grey graphs) for all DE miRs and only CholinomiRs. Although PCA shows only minor improvements in group separation when focusing on CholinomiRs, using LDA with three groups and CholinomiRs leads to high discrimination capacity between healthy controls and FMS patients with mild pain-related daily life impairment (FMS_mild_imp) and severely pain-related daily life impairment (FMS_severe_imp). Abbreviations: CTR, healthy control; DE, differentially expressed; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; PCA, principal component analysis.
Cells 11 01276 g003
Cells 11 01276 g004 550
Figure 4. CholinomiRs are related to pain and form a specific FMS signature. Identified CholinomiRs may positively correlate with pain intensity. (A) FMS blood levels of hsa-miR-27b-3p (p = 0.039; padj = 0.530) and (B) hsa-miR.148a-3p (* p = 0.045; padj. = 0.563) increased with the mean pain level experienced in the past 6 months, but all 19 CholinomiRs failed to pass post-correction for multiple testing. Spearman correlation test with Holm–Sidak post correction. (C) Volcano plot of miRs in PD versus HC with no DE miRs. FMS CholinomiRs present in the PD dataset are marked in red. (D,E) Only comparing CPM expression levels of FMS CholinomiRs in PD revealed trends for lower hsa-miR-128-3p (p = 0.028; padj = 0.364) and within PD patients with pain related impairments an hsa-625-5p downregulation (p = 0.052; padj = 0.678). Mann–Whitney U tests with Holm–Sidak post correction. Abbreviations: CPM, counts per million; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; HC, healthy control; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PD_nPI, Parkinson’s disease without pain-related daily life impairment; PD_PI, Parkinson’s disease with pain-related daily life impairment.
Figure 4. CholinomiRs are related to pain and form a specific FMS signature. Identified CholinomiRs may positively correlate with pain intensity. (A) FMS blood levels of hsa-miR-27b-3p (p = 0.039; padj = 0.530) and (B) hsa-miR.148a-3p (* p = 0.045; padj. = 0.563) increased with the mean pain level experienced in the past 6 months, but all 19 CholinomiRs failed to pass post-correction for multiple testing. Spearman correlation test with Holm–Sidak post correction. (C) Volcano plot of miRs in PD versus HC with no DE miRs. FMS CholinomiRs present in the PD dataset are marked in red. (D,E) Only comparing CPM expression levels of FMS CholinomiRs in PD revealed trends for lower hsa-miR-128-3p (p = 0.028; padj = 0.364) and within PD patients with pain related impairments an hsa-625-5p downregulation (p = 0.052; padj = 0.678). Mann–Whitney U tests with Holm–Sidak post correction. Abbreviations: CPM, counts per million; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; HC, healthy control; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PD_nPI, Parkinson’s disease without pain-related daily life impairment; PD_PI, Parkinson’s disease with pain-related daily life impairment.
Cells 11 01276 g004
Cells 11 01276 g005 550
Figure 5. qRT-PCR validation of hsa-miR-182-5p. (A) Workflow illustrating cohorts and normalization of hsa-miR182-5p with four unaltered control transcripts. (B) Screening of SNORD38B, SNORD44, SNORD48, and hsa-miR-423-5p selected as controls for miR validation and indicated in green. (C) hsa-miR-182-5p median expression level is upregulated by twofold in FMS (n = 49), shown as normalized relative expression to CTR (n = 25). The dotted line represents median control expression. Mann–Whitney U Test, ** p < 0.01. Box and whiskers plots with min to max. Abbreviations: CTR, healthy controls; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; miR, microRNA; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.
Figure 5. qRT-PCR validation of hsa-miR-182-5p. (A) Workflow illustrating cohorts and normalization of hsa-miR182-5p with four unaltered control transcripts. (B) Screening of SNORD38B, SNORD44, SNORD48, and hsa-miR-423-5p selected as controls for miR validation and indicated in green. (C) hsa-miR-182-5p median expression level is upregulated by twofold in FMS (n = 49), shown as normalized relative expression to CTR (n = 25). The dotted line represents median control expression. Mann–Whitney U Test, ** p < 0.01. Box and whiskers plots with min to max. Abbreviations: CTR, healthy controls; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome; miR, microRNA; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.
Cells 11 01276 g005
Cells 11 01276 g006 550
Figure 6. miR-gene interactions. Up-(green) and downregulated (magenta) FMS CholinomiRs are connected to their respective cholinergic target genes (orange) with a total of 47 targets. See comprehensive interaction summary with complete gene names in Supplementary File S2. Abbreviations: miR, microRNA.
Figure 6. miR-gene interactions. Up-(green) and downregulated (magenta) FMS CholinomiRs are connected to their respective cholinergic target genes (orange) with a total of 47 targets. See comprehensive interaction summary with complete gene names in Supplementary File S2. Abbreviations: miR, microRNA.
Cells 11 01276 g006
Cells 11 01276 g007 550
Figure 7. Transcript levels of related cholinergic mRNAs. (A) Workflow illustrates cohorts investigated. Global expression of two highly targeted transcripts BMPR2 (B) and IL6ST (C) was downregulated by 27.8% (* p = 0.025) and 19.9% (* p = 0.022), whereas RORA (D) and NR1D2 (E) were not altered in whole blood. ACHE (F) and BDNF (G), targeted equally by up- and down-regulated CholinomiRs, showed no altered expression, also seen in cholinergic transcripts NGFR (H), BMP3 (I), and SRSF6 (J), which were associated with fewer CholinomiRs. Randomly selected cohort subgroups with n = 29 FMS versus n = 18 CTR (B–F,H) or n = 15 FMS versus n = 15 CTR (G,I,J) were analyzed. Box and whisker plots with min to max. Mann–Whitney U test. Green color depicts upregulated miRs, whereas magenta labels depict downregulated miRs connected to the corresponding mRNA transcript in black.
Figure 7. Transcript levels of related cholinergic mRNAs. (A) Workflow illustrates cohorts investigated. Global expression of two highly targeted transcripts BMPR2 (B) and IL6ST (C) was downregulated by 27.8% (* p = 0.025) and 19.9% (* p = 0.022), whereas RORA (D) and NR1D2 (E) were not altered in whole blood. ACHE (F) and BDNF (G), targeted equally by up- and down-regulated CholinomiRs, showed no altered expression, also seen in cholinergic transcripts NGFR (H), BMP3 (I), and SRSF6 (J), which were associated with fewer CholinomiRs. Randomly selected cohort subgroups with n = 29 FMS versus n = 18 CTR (B–F,H) or n = 15 FMS versus n = 15 CTR (G,I,J) were analyzed. Box and whisker plots with min to max. Mann–Whitney U test. Green color depicts upregulated miRs, whereas magenta labels depict downregulated miRs connected to the corresponding mRNA transcript in black.
Cells 11 01276 g007
Cells 11 01276 g008 550
Figure 8. Cholinesterase activity in serum. (A) Cohorts and methods. (B) Total cholinesterase status in FMS and CTR sera (p = 0.401) and subdivision in (C) AChE-specific activity (p = 0.256) and (D) BChE-specific activity (p = 0.6224). Mann–Whitney U Test. Abbreviations: AChE, acetylcholinesterase; AU, arbitrary unit; CTR, healthy controls; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome. Note that there is larger variability in FMS cholinesterase activity compared to that of CTR.
Figure 8. Cholinesterase activity in serum. (A) Cohorts and methods. (B) Total cholinesterase status in FMS and CTR sera (p = 0.401) and subdivision in (C) AChE-specific activity (p = 0.256) and (D) BChE-specific activity (p = 0.6224). Mann–Whitney U Test. Abbreviations: AChE, acetylcholinesterase; AU, arbitrary unit; CTR, healthy controls; FMS, fibromyalgia syndrome. Note that there is larger variability in FMS cholinesterase activity compared to that of CTR.
Cells 11 01276 g008
Table
Table 1. List of applied primer assays.
Table 1. List of applied primer assays.
SYBR Green PrimerAssay NumberCompany
hsa-miR-182-5pYP00206070Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
hsa-miR-194-5pYP00204080Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
hsa-miR-221-3pYP00204532Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
hsa-miR-423-5pYP00205624 Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
hsa-miR-492-5pYP00204053Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
hsa-miR-92a-3pYP00204258Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
hsa-miR-93-5pYP00204715Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
5SYP00203906Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
SNORD38BYP00203901Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
SNORD44YP00203902Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
SNORD48YP00203903Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
Taqman PrimerAssay NumberCompany
AChEHs00241307_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
BDNFHs00380947_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
BMP3Hs00609638_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
BMPR2Hs00176148_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
CHRNA4Hs00181247_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
CHRNB2Hs01114010_g1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
IL6STHs00174360_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
NGFRHs00609976_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
NR1D2 Hs00233309_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
RORAHs00536545_m1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
SRSF6Hs05331162_g1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA
Abbreviations: AChE, acetylcholinesterase; BDNF, brain derived neurotrophic factor; BMP3, bone morphogenetic protein 3; BMPR2, bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2; CHRNA4, cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 4 subunit; CHRNB2, cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 2 subunit; IL6ST, interleukin 6 cytokine family signal transducer; NGFR, nerve growth factor receptor; NR1D2, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 2; RORA, RAR related orphan receptor A; SNORD, small nucleolar RNA; SRSF6, serine and arginine rich splicing factor 6.
Table
Table 2. Main clinical parameters of the study cohort that was restricted to women.
Table 2. Main clinical parameters of the study cohort that was restricted to women.
ParameterFMS (n = 49)FMS-CTR (n = 25)PD (n = 92)PD-CTR (n = 47)
Age, median53535656
(range)(25–67)(24–62)(34–65)(31–65)
BMI, median2523n.an.a
(range)(17–40)(17–42)
Individual patients on amitriptyline:
(Regimen, mg, years)		6nonenonenone
0-0-1, 10, 10
0-0-1, 10, 1
0-0-1, 10, 2
on demand, 5, 2
1-0-0, 10, 1
0-0-1, 10, 1
Graded Chronic Pain Scale; mean pain intensity last 6 months (0–10) (range)60n.an.a
(2–9)(0–8)
Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale;n.an.a0.830.46
Pain and other Sensations(0–4)(0–3)
Abbreviations: FMS, Fibromyalgia syndrome; FMS-CTR, healthy control cohort for FMS; PD, Parkinson’s disease; healthy control cohort for PD; n.a., not applied.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Erbacher, C.; Vaknine, S.; Moshitzky, G.; Lobentanzer, S.; Eisenberg, L.; Evdokimov, D.; Sommer, C.; Greenberg, D.S.; Soreq, H.; Üçeyler, N. Distinct CholinomiR Blood Cell Signature as a Potential Modulator of the Cholinergic System in Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Cells 2022, 11, 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11081276

AMA Style

Erbacher C, Vaknine S, Moshitzky G, Lobentanzer S, Eisenberg L, Evdokimov D, Sommer C, Greenberg DS, Soreq H, Üçeyler N. Distinct CholinomiR Blood Cell Signature as a Potential Modulator of the Cholinergic System in Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Cells. 2022; 11(8):1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11081276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Erbacher, Christoph, Shani Vaknine, Gilli Moshitzky, Sebastian Lobentanzer, Lina Eisenberg, Dimitar Evdokimov, Claudia Sommer, David S. Greenberg, Hermona Soreq, and Nurcan Üçeyler. 2022. "Distinct CholinomiR Blood Cell Signature as a Potential Modulator of the Cholinergic System in Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome" Cells 11, no. 8: 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11081276

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop