Next Article in Journal
Species-Specific Gamete Interaction during Sea Urchin Fertilization: Roles of the Egg Jelly and Vitelline Layer
Next Article in Special Issue
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Pathology and Predictive Biomarkers
Previous Article in Journal
Exploration of N6-Methyladenosine Profiles of mRNAs and the Function of METTL3 in Atherosclerosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of the Tumor Microenvironment in Regulating Pancreatic Cancer Therapy Resistance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preliminary Development and Testing of C595 Radioimmunoconjugates for Targeting MUC1 Cancer Epitopes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

1
Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
2
Department of PET, Nuclear Medicine & Bone Densitometry, Royal Adelaide Hospital, SA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
3
Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
4
Molecular Imaging and Therapy Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
5
School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
6
Translational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(19), 2983; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11192983
Submission received: 19 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 24 September 2022

Abstract

:
Mucin 1 is a transmembrane glycoprotein which overexpresses cancer-specific epitopes (MUC1-CE) on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells. As PDAC is a low survival and highly aggressive malignancy, developing radioimmunoconjugates capable of targeting MUC1-CE could lead to improvements in PDAC outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop and perform preliminary testing of diagnostic and therapeutic radioimmunoconjugates for PDAC using an anti-MUC1 antibody, C595. Firstly, p-SCN-Bn-DOTA was conjugated to the C595 antibody to form a DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate. The stability and binding affinity of the DOTA-C595 conjugate was evaluated using mass spectrometry and ELISA. DOTA-C595 was radiolabelled to Copper-64, Lutetium-177, Gallium-68 and Technetium-99m to form novel radioimmunoconjugates. Cell binding assays were performed in PANC-1 (strong MUC1-CE expression) and AsPC-1 (weak MUC1-CE expression) cell lines using 64Cu-DOTA-C595 and 177Lu-DOTA-C595. An optimal molar ratio of 4:1 DOTA groups per C595 molecule was obtained from the conjugation process. DOTA-C595 labelled to Copper-64, Lutetium-177, and Technetium-99m with high efficiency, although the Gallium-68 labelling was low. 177Lu-DOTA-C595 demonstrated high cellular binding to the PANC-1 cell lines which was significantly greater than AsPC-1 binding at concentrations exceeding 100 nM (p < 0.05). 64Cu-DOTA-C595 showed similar binding to the PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells with no significant differences observed between cell lines (p > 0.05). The high cellular binding of 177Lu-DOTA-C595 to MUC1-CE positive cell lines suggests promise as a therapeutic radioimmunoconjugate against PDAC while further work is required to harness the potential of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 as a diagnostic radioimmunoconjugate.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common form of pancreatic cancer, accounting for up to 90% of pancreatic neoplasms [1,2]. Despite representing the 8th most common cancer diagnosis in the United States of America and Australia, PDAC is the 4th most common cause of cancer-related death and has a 5-year survival rate of 11% [1,3]. The non-specific symptoms, limited early detection methods and late presentation contribute to the poor outcomes [4,5]. Current therapeutic interventions are ineffective against late-stage disease [6,7] and highlight the need for new diagnostic and therapeutic measures capable of targeting advanced PDAC.
Radioimmunoconjugates, formed by binding radionuclides to monoclonal antibodies (mAb), can provide specific targeting of cancer cells to both diagnose and treat diseases [8]. For diagnostic purposes, short-lived radionuclides such as Gallium-68 (68Ga), Copper-64 (64Cu) and Technetium-99m (99mTc) (Table 1) can deliver non-invasive molecular imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). High energy radionuclides with longer half-lives and cytotoxic particle-emissions, including Lutetium-177 (177Lu) and Actinium-225 (225Ac), can be used for radioimmunotherapy. When diagnostic and therapeutic conjugates target the same cellular receptor or molecular pathway, they can be considered theranostic. In theranostics, the imaging agent identifies if a patient’s disease has sufficient expression of the target receptor to receive the therapeutic agent. This process provides a personalised form of medicine and can inform clinical decisions by predicting the potential therapeutic efficacy and treatment-related toxicities of the radioimmunotherapy based on the individual’s expression profile [9]. The use of theranostics is increasing and has demonstrated value in several cancers, including prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumours using 68Ga/177Lu-labelled PSMA and DOTA-TATE, respectively [10,11,12], however success does rely on selection of the target receptor [13].
Mucin 1 (MUC1) is a polymorphic glycoprotein which has a role in cell signalling [14,15]. MUC1 has ubiquitous tissue expression and is physiologically expressed on the apical surface of epithelial tissues, however, it is also aberrantly overexpressed and hypoglycosylated on cancerous cells [16,17,18,19]. This hypoglycosylation exposes the variable number tandem repeat region (VNTR) which holds a number of cancer-specific MUC1 epitopes (MUC1-CE). Several studies have identified these MUC1-CE as having an optimal expression profile for targeted therapy of PDAC [20,21,22,23]. The expression of MUC1-CE has also been correlated with more advanced PDAC, suggesting these epitopes could be used to characterise and treat late-stage disease [24]. Of note is the Arg-Pro-Ala-Pro MUC1-CE which can be targeted by C595, an IgG3 murine mAb [25,26,27]. Over 90% of PDAC overexpress the C595-reactive MUC1-CE yet expression on normal tissues is minimal [20,21,22]. This expression profile is ideal for targeted therapy as it allows for specific targeting of only cancer cells to optimise the therapeutic efficacy and minimise normal-tissue toxicities [28].
Given the optimal expression profile of MUC1-CE, developing complementary radioimmunoconjugates based on the C595 mAb may provide an avenue to detect and treat advanced PDAC. The aim of this study was to develop a novel C595 immunoconjugate and test its radiolabelling capacity with several diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclides to identify prospective radioimmunoconjugates for theranostic applications of PDAC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Antibody, Chelator, Peptides and Other Reagents

The C595 mAb was purchased from Medical Scitec Australia Pty Ltd. (Sydney, Australia) and prepared by QED Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). Rabbit anti-mouse IgG HRP was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The bifunctional chelator, p-SCN-Bn-DOTA (S-2-(4-Isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid, MW: 687.8 g/mol) was purchased from Macrocyclics (Dallas, TX, USA) and MUC1 peptide with the sequence GVTSAPDTRPAPGSTAPPA was purchased from GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated.

2.2. Conjugation of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA to C595 mAb

The C595 mAb was buffer exchanged into metal-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using a 50 kDa Amicon® centrifugal filter unit (Merck Milipore, Burlington, MA, USA) to remove sodium azide. To assess the influence of different molar ratios on conjugation, purified C595 (1 mg) was incubated with 20-, 40-, 50- and 100-fold molar excesses of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA in a 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.5) for 2 h at 37 °C in a ThermoMixer® (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 700 RPM. The resulting DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate were purified to remove unconjugated DOTA molecules using a 50 kDA Amicon® centrifugal filter unit and buffer transferred into 0.1 M ammonium acetate pH 7.4.

2.3. Determination of Number of Chelators per Antibody

The protein concentration of DOTA-C595 conjugate was quantified using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. A spectroscopic Cu(II)-Arsenazo(III) assay was performed to quantify the number of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA groups in the conjugate [29]. Briefly, p-SCN-Bn-DOTA stock was diluted to 3 mM in milli-Q water. In triplicate, the 3 mM DOTA stock (10 µL) was serially diluted in 10 µL of milli-Q water in a 96-well plate to produce a standard DOTA curve. Triplicate samples of the purified immunoconjugate (10 µL) were added to separate wells in the well-plate. 1× Cu(II)-Arsenazo(III) solution (190 µL) was added to each well and the well-plate was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The absorbance at 630 nm was measured using a FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) plate reader. The concentration of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA in the immunoconjugate was calculated using the standard DOTA curve (Supplementary Figure S1). The molar ratio between the DOTA and C595 protein concentrations in the immunoconjugate was then established.

2.4. Location of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA Binding on C595 Antibody Chains

The conjugation site of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA to the C595 mAb was determined using mass spectrometry (MS). Samples of DOTA-C595 conjugate and unmodified C595 were buffer exchanged into 0.2 M ammonium acetate using a 50 kDa Amicon® centrifugal filter unit and diluted to 3 mg/mL. Samples were reduced into light and heavy antibody chains through 1:10 addition of 0.1 M of dithiothreitol (DTT) prepared in 0.2 M ammonium acetate. The samples were incubated with DTT at 37 °C for up to 60 min before reading analysis by MS. Protein mass measurements were carried out under denaturing conditions using an Agilent 6230 time-of-flight instrument coupled to an Agilent 1260 Infinity II LC System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Protein sample (5 µL) was injected and electrosprayed using 50% aqueous acetonitrile/0.01% formic acid at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min, without chromatographic separation. ESI-MS conditions were: positive-ion mode; capillary voltage, 4000 V; nozzle voltage 2000 V; fragmentor, 200 V; gas 13 L/min; gas temperature, 325 °C; sheath gas 11 L/min; and sheath gas temperature, 350 °C. Spectra were deconvoluted using BioConfirm software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.5. Stability of Immunoconjugate Using Mass Spectrometry

To assess DOTA-C595 stability under different storage and physiological conditions, 3 mg/mL samples of the immunoconjugate were stored in conditions consisting of: 0.1 M ammonium acetate pH 7.4 at 4 °C, 0.1 M ammonium acetate pH 7.4 at 37 °C, 0.1 M ammonium acetate pH 6.4 at 37 °C or PBS pH 7.4 at 4 °C. The 4 and 37 °C temperatures were used to represent the typical storage and radiolabelling conditions of the immunoconjugates whilst pH 7.4 and 6.4 were considered to represent the physiological pH and more acidic radiolabelling conditions, respectively. For each storage condition, samples were frozen at baseline (day 0) and every 24 h for 7 days. Additional samples stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) at 4 °C and PBS (pH 7.4) at 4 °C were also assessed at day 30 to assess longer-term stability. On the day of analysis, the samples were defrosted, reduced into heavy and light chains, and prepared for MS using the steps outlined above.

2.6. Comparison of Binding Affinity

An ELISA was performed to assess for differences in the binding affinity of unmodified C595 and the DOTA-C595 conjugate to the MUC1-CE. Initially, a 96-well high binding ELISA plate was coated with 20 µg/mL of MUC1 peptide diluted in 0.1 M PBS at pH 7.4 and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The following day, the plate was washed four times using filtered PBS to remove unbound peptide. Non-specific binding was blocked by incubating each well with 150 µL of 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS for 1 h at 37 °C. Excess BSA/PBS was removed from the wells following incubation. Serial dilutions (1:2) of 100 µg/mL of DOTA-C595 and unmodified C595 in 2% BSA/PBS were then added to the wells in triplicate samples and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, the wells were washed with filtered PBS. The wells were then incubated with 100 µL of rabbit anti-mouse IgG HRP diluted in 1% BSA/PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Each well was washed five times using PBS. ABTS substrate was reconstituted by dissolving 1 tablet (10 mg) in 100 mL of 0.05 M phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 5.0 before 100 µL of 30% hydrogen peroxide was added. 100 µL of the ABTS substrate solution was then added to each well and developed for 5 min at room temperature. Absorbance at 405 nm was measured at 30 min with background readings subtracted. Dissociation constants (KD) values were determined using GraphPad Prism (v. 8, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.7. Radiolabelling of DOTA-C595

Fresh DOTA-C595 was radiolabelled with 99mTc, 177Lu, 68Ga and 64Cu. Briefly for 99mTc labelling, 0.1 mg of stannous chloride (30 µL of 3.33 mg/mL) was added to a vial containing 500 µL of 10% acetic acid. 100 µg of DOTA-C595 was added to the vial followed by 200 MBq of freshly eluted 99mTc. Sodium bicarbonate (2 mL) was also added to achieve a pH of 7. The reaction vial was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. 177Lu-DOTA-C595 was produced by adding 40 MBq of 177LuCl3 and 500 µg of DOTA-C595 to 100 µL of 0.5 M ammonium acetate pH 6. The reaction was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h using a ThermoMixer® set to 500 RPM. To label with 68Ga, 100 µg of DOTA-C595 was added to a vial containing 0.2 mL of 1 M sodium acetate trihydrate pH 4, followed by the addition of 100 MBq of freshly eluted 68Ga in 1 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. The reaction was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min then purified using 10 kDa Amicon® centrifugal filter unit. Labelling with 64Cu involved incubating 20 MBq of 64Cu with 240 µg of DOTA-C595 in a reaction vial containing 100 µL of 0.1 M ammonium acetate, pH 6. The reaction vial was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min on a ThermoMixer® set to shake at 600 RPM.

2.8. Determination of Radiolabelling Yield and Purity

Instant-thin layer chromatography (ITLC) was used to monitor the reactions and determine radiolabelling yield. For each radioimmunoconjugate, a 3 µL sample of the reaction solution was aliquoted onto a silica-gel ITLC (ITLC-SG) strip. The 99mTc and 177Lu strips were developed in acetone and 25 mM DTPA pH 6, respectively. Both 68Ga and 64Cu strips were developed in 0.1 M citric acid pH 5. The ITLC strip was scanned using a Scan-Ram radio TLC scanner (LabLogic Systems Ltd., Tampa, FL, USA).
Radiochemical purity and protein quantification of the 177Lu and 64Cu radioimmunoconjugates was evaluated using Size Exclusion Chromatography-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (SEC-HPLC). Analysis was performed on a Shimadzu LC-20 series with SPD-20A detector, using Agilent AdvanceBio SEC 300 (2.7 µm, 300 × 7.4 mm) column with PBS buffer (pH 6.8) at a flowrate of 1 mL/min. 30 µL of sample were injected. Protein quantification was determined by area under the curve of major peak (5–7 min) and was based on standard curve of known mAb concentration (4.8 mg/mL) at 220 nm and 280 nm.

2.9. Cell Cultures

The human pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1 and AsPC-1 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). PANC-1 cells were cultured using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S). AsPC-1 cells were cultured using Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S. All cell lines were grown in T75 flasks and incubated at 37 °C with 5% carbon dioxide in atmospheric oxygen. Cells were used within three months of resuscitation and regularly monitored for mycoplasma contamination using MycoAlert detection kit (Lonza Group Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). Unless otherwise stated, all cell culture reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Pty Ltd. (Castle Hill, Australia).
For experiments, cells were grown to confluence then washed twice with PBS and detached from the flask by TrypLE™ Select Enzyme (1X) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Australia Pty Ltd., Scoresby, Australia). Detached cells were centrifuged at 300× g for 5 min to separate the cell pellet and supernatant to prepare cells for seeding.

2.10. Cell Binding Assays

To evaluate the binding capacity of the radioimmunoconjugates to MUC1-CE, separate cell binding assays were performed using 177Lu-DOTA-C595 and 64Cu-DOTA-C595. Our previous work has identified that 93.1% of PANC-1 cells express MUC1-CE compared to only 11.5% of AsPC-1 cells (Supplementary Figure S2) [22]. Due to the variable MUC1-CE expression, these cell lines were used to evaluate for binding differences relative to MUC1-CE expression. Briefly, PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells (105 cells suspended in 250 µL of media) were seeded into 24-well plates and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. Varying concentrations of radioimmunoconjugate (0–500 nM) were added to the cells in triplicate and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, excess media and unbound radioimmunoconjugate were removed from the wells. Cells were washed twice using PBS then detached using TrypLE™ Select Enzyme (1X). The cell lysates were collected and the counts per minute (CPM) of each cell sample was measured using a Hidex Automatic Gamma Counter (Hidex, Turku, Finland). Outliers were removed and background-corrected total cell binding in CPM was plotted against radioimmunoconjugate concentration. The graph was fitted with non-linear least squares regression. Nonspecific binding was considered as proportional to the radioimmunoconjugate concentration.
A separate blocking experiment was also performed using 64Cu-DOTA-C595. In this experiment, MUC1-CE were blocked by incubating cells with unlabelled C595 for 1 h at 4 °C before proceeding with the cell binding experiment as detailed above.

2.11. Influence of Storage on Radiolabelling and Cell Binding

To determine if DOTA-C595 remained stable after long-term storage, the radiolabelling and cell binding experiments were repeated using 177Lu and 64Cu. For the repeated 177Lu experiments, the conjugate was stored in a 0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer pH 7 at 4 °C for 120 days before experiments were repeated. The storage time was extended to 180 days for the repeated 64Cu experiments. The delayed radiolabelling and cell binding assays were compared to the original 177Lu and 64Cu results achieved when using fresh DOTA-C595.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (v. 8, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Unless otherwise stated, all experiments were performed in triplicate with data presented as mean ± standard deviation. p-values for cell binding data were calculated by performing multiple paired t-tests. Significance was deemed when p < 0.05.

2.13. Facilities

All non-radioactive experimental procedures were conducted at the Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia. Mass spectrometry was performed at the School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide. Radiolabelling and quality control tests were performed in licensed radiation laboratories at the Department of PET, Nuclear Medicine and Bone Densitometry, Royal Adelaide Hospital and the Molecular Imaging and Therapy Research Unit (MITRU), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI). Cell binding assays using the radioimmunoconjugates were also performed at MITRU, SAHMRI.

3. Results

3.1. Conjugation of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA to C595

The average number of chelators attached per antibody increased with the molar excess of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA added (Table 2). An average chelator-to-antibody ratio of 4:1 was selected as an appropriate starting point for radiolabelling for two reasons. Firstly, chelator-to-antibody ratios exceeding 5 have previously been shown to alter the biochemical properties of the conjugate and decrease immunoreactivity of the antibody [29]. Secondly, low chelator-to-antibody ratios can limit the specific activities which can be radiolabelled [30]. As such, an average chelator-to-antibody ratio of 4:1 was considered an optimal middle point for radiolabelling at appropriate specific activity for cell-based studies without disrupting the immunoreactivity of the antibody. Therefore, for all remaining experiments, the DOTA-C595 conjugate was produced using a 40-fold molar excess of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA.
The presence of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA binding to the C595 antibody chains was indicated by a mass shift of approximately 551 Da measured by MS. When reduced into light and heavy chains, unmodified C595 demonstrated primary mass peaks of 23,244.7 Da and 50,690.0 Da, respectively (Figure 1A and Figure 2A). An additional mass peak was noted on the light chain of the DOTA-C595 conjugate at 23,796.2 Da, representing a 551.6 Da mass shift equal to the binding of a single DOTA molecule (Figure 1B). Three additional mass peaks were identified on the heavy chain of the DOTA-C595 conjugate at 51,241.6 Da (mass shift of 550.3 Da), 51,793.0 Da (mass shift of 551.4 Da) and 52,345.4 Da (mass shift of 552.4 Da) (Figure 2B). These findings indicate preferential binding of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA to the heavy C595 chain and confirmed a maximum 4:1 molar ratio of DOTA to C595 molecules. Secondary peaks were also identified on the heavy chains and likely indicate variable glycosylation of the C595 mAb.

3.2. Stability of DOTA-C595 Immunoconjugate

Mass spectra demonstrated the DOTA-C595 conjugation was stable. The primary storage condition of 0.1 M ammonium acetate pH 7.4 at 4 °C demonstrated similar mass spectra for samples analysed at day 0, 7 and 30 (Figure 3 and Figure 4). On the heavy chain, a reduction in ions counts was observed at day 30 which may suggest possible sample precipitation; however, no count reductions were noted on the light chain. The 4:1 molar ratio also remained stable when the immunoconjugate was stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate at pH 6.4 or pH 7.4 at 37 °C for 7 days, with minimal differences observed in mass peaks and sample counts, except for low sample counts on the day 7 heavy chain sample stored at pH 7.4 (Supplementary Figures S3–S6). Both the heavy and light chain samples stored in PBS (pH 7.4) at 4 °C demonstrated low ion counts at Day 30 compared to Day 0, however the location of the mass peaks remained stable (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8).

3.3. Effect of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA Conjugation to C595 Binding Affinity

Compared to unmodified C595, DOTA-C595 demonstrated similar binding to the MUC1 peptide at all analysed C595 concentrations (Figure 5). KD values did not significantly differ between unmodified C595 and DOTA-C595 (113 nM vs. 108 nM, p = 0.515), confirming the p-SCN-Bn-DOTA conjugation process did not affect C595 binding affinity to MUC1-CE.

3.4. Radioimmunoconjugate Production

Radiolabelling with 64Cu demonstrated the highest labelling yield and radiochemical purity of the labelling reactions in this study (Table 3, Figure 6A). Labelling with 177Lu (Figure 6B) and 99mTc also produced high yields exceeding 90% without the need for additional purification, but radiochemical purity was lower compared to 64Cu. There was a low radiolabelling yield of 68Ga-DOTA-C595 of approximately 30% following the initial 30 min incubation period. Extending the 68Ga reaction time to 2 h and purifying the resulting radioimmunoconjugate improved radiolabelling yield, however the yield remained low at only 50% radiolabelling efficiency.
Despite high radiolabelling yield, 99mTc-DOTA-C595 was unable to be analysed using SEC-HPLC. A similar issue was also identified using purified 68Ga-DOTA-C595. While these issues may be due to SEC-HPLC column, it may also demonstrate weak bonds between 99mTc, 68Ga and DOTA-C595 which were unable to withstand SEC-HPLC pressures.

3.5. Cell Binding Assays

Due to the high radiolabelling efficiency, purity and simple preparation methods, cell binding assays were performed using 64Cu-DOTA-C595 and 177Lu-DOTA-C595.
In the 177Lu-DOTA-C595 experiment, radioimmunoconjugate binding steadily increased in PANC-1 cells with concentration (Figure 7A). Binding to PANC-1 cells saturated at approximately 400 nM of 177Lu-DOTA-C595. Only small increases in cell binding were observed in AsPC-1 cells as 177Lu-DOTA-C595 concentration increased, with binding also saturating around 400 nM. At concentrations of 100 nM and greater, 177Lu-DOTA-C595 binding was significantly increased on PANC-1 cells compared to AsPC-1 cells (p < 0.005) (Table 4). This indicates preferential binding of 177Lu-DOTA-C595 to the strongly MUC1-CE expressing PANC-1 cell line.
No significant differences were identified between the cellular binding of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 to the PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cell lines (Table 4). For both cell lines, 64Cu-DOTA-C595 binding followed a similar upward trend as concentration increased. Saturation of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 binding was not achieved for PANC-1 or AsPC-1 (Figure 7B).
When PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells were blocked using C595, the binding of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 was linear with concentration. There was minor variation in the binding to both PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells following the C595 blocking (Figure 8).

3.6. Influence of Storage on Radiolabelling and Cell Binding

Both 177Lu and 64Cu labelled to 120- and 180-day old DOTA-C595, respectively, with high efficiency. There were no significant changes in the radio-ITLC when the radionuclides were labelled to fresh DOTA-C595 compared to the stored DOTA-C595 (Figure 9). The stored 177Lu-DOTA-C595 demonstrated a similar binding trend as the fresh 177Lu-DOTA-C595 (Figure 10), confirming stability of DOTA-C595 for up to 120 days. Stored 64Cu-DOTA-C595 had inconsistent binding to both cell lines which may suggest degradation of the conjugate by 180 days.

4. Discussion

Despite minor improvements in survival rates over recent years, PDAC continues to have a poor prognosis and requires new targeted therapies that are effective against the metastatic disease often observed at the time of presentation. Radioimmunotherapy is one method which could provide a highly targeted PDAC treatment. The utility of radioimmunotherapy can be improved by developing complementary imaging radioimmunoconjugates which allow for the informed selection of patients who have optimal expression of the target receptor for radioimmunotherapy [9,12]. We have previously identified MUC1-CE as an ideal target receptor given its expression is correlated with advanced PDAC and it is overexpressed on up to 90% of PDAC cells yet minimally expressed on normal cells [20,21,22]. Effective targeting of MUC1-CE is feasible using the C595 antibody and provides an avenue for radioimmunoconjugate development. In this study, we developed the DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate using the p-SCN-Bn-DOTA chelator and produced four C595-based diagnostic and therapeutic radioimmunoconjugates for potential preclinical and clinical testing in PDAC.
The conjugation of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA to the C595 antibody was performed to produce a universal immunoconjugate for labelling with different radionuclides. P-SCN-Bn-DOTA was the chelator of choice given its aromatic isothiocyanate group which is known to react and remain kinetically inert with most radionuclides [31]. Typically, p-SCN-Bn-DOTA forms covalent bonds with antibodies via the lysine side chains and thiourea coupling [31,32]. There are around 80 lysine residues found on antibodies and due to their polarity and hydrophilicity, many of these are located on the protein surface, making them an easily accessible binding site [33,34]. Our study determined a 3:1 ratio of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA molecules functionalising on the C595 heavy chain compared to light chain. The conjugation process also achieved a maximum molar ratio of 4:1 when a 40-fold molar excess of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA was added. The molar ratio is optimal to ensure sufficient DOTA sites for radiolabelling without largely affecting the C595 binding kinetics of the radioimmunoconjugate and allows estimation of the overall payload achievable by the radioimmunoconjugate [35].
The binding affinity of C595 to MUC1-CE remained unchanged when DOTA-conjugated as demonstrated by the KD values. In this study, the ELISA was performed using a MUC1 peptide with sequence of GVTSAPDTRPAPGSTAPPA which positioned the C595-reactive RPAP section within the middle of the MUC1-CE protein sequence [25,26,27]. The ability of the DOTA-C595 conjugate to bind in the presence of neighbouring amino acids was assessed by centring the target epitope within the sequence, providing more physiological experimental conditions.
Mass spectra demonstrated the DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate was stable and retained an average 4:1 molar ratio in all storage conditions assessed in this study. Of particular interest was the comparison of long-term storage in either 0.1 M ammonium acetate, pH 7.4 at 4 °C or PBS pH 7.4 at 4 °C. Whilst both long-term storage conditions showed a stable conjugate, low ion counts were noted on the heavy chain samples at day 30. The authors speculate the low counts may be due to antibody degradation from repeated freeze–thaw cycles needed to ensure a single MS session, or the unstable buffering capacity of ammonium acetate at pH 7.4 [36,37]. Whilst the cause of the low ion counts cannot be determined in this study, the authors conclude 0.1 M ammonium acetate, pH 7.4 at 4 °C is the preferred storage condition for the DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate as unlike PBS, ammonium acetate is a commonly used radiolabelling buffer for several radionuclides. Storage of DOTA-C595 in ammonium acetate can then reduce the need for buffer transferring, which will better maintain the integrity of the conjugate. Furthermore, storage of DOTA-C595 in 0.1 M ammonium acetate, pH 7.4 at 4 °C for 120 days was found to have no effect on radiolabelling and binding affinity, as determined by cell binding assays. Extending the storage time to 180 days was shown to impair binding affinity through the likely degradation of the conjugate. Based on these results, it is the recommended to use stored DOTA-C595 within a 120-day window.
In this study, we produced four radioimmunoconjugates—64Cu-DOTA-C595, 177Lu-DOTA-C595, 99mTc-DOTA-C595 and 68Ga-DOTA-C595. All radioimmunoconjugates except for 68Ga-DOTA-C595 demonstrated fast and efficient radiolabelling processes and were performed using relatively mild and simple conditions. However, confirmation of radiochemical purity via SEC-HPLC was only possible using 64Cu-DOTA-C595 and 177Lu-DOTA-C595. The inability to evaluate the radiochemical purity of 99mTc-DOTA-C595 and 68Ga-DOTA-C595 may suggest weak bonds between 99mTc/68Ga and DOTA-C595 which are unable to withstand SEC-HPLC pressures. Slow reaction kinetics, low thermodynamic stability and the potential for gallium ion hydrolysis likely contributed to the low 68Ga radiolabelling yield and purity [38,39]. The former two factors are likely due to the small ionic radii of Ga(III) which is incompatible with the large DOTA coordination cavity (Table 5) [32,40]. Whilst the ionic radius of Tc(IV) is similar to Ga(III), the 6 h half life of 99mTc allows for reactions to be extended to improve radiolabelling yield. Extending 68Ga labelling beyond 2 h is not feasible due to the short 68 min half-life. Instead, 68Ga to DOTA reactions are typically heated to high temperatures of 90 °C to improve radiolabelling [41,42]. Such temperatures were unable to be used in this study due to the potential for C595 antibody degradation and subsequent impact on the antibodies binding potential [43]. All radiolabelling protocols were thus limited to 37 °C to prevent C595 aggregation.
In terms of cellular binding, 177Lu-DOTA-C595 showed significantly greater binding to the PANC-1 cells, which strongly express MUC1-CE, compared to the weakly expressing cell line, AsPC-1. The comparative binding of 177Lu-DOTA-C595 between the cell lines suggests the C595 binding kinetics remain intact following 177Lu radiolabelling and warrant further investigations into 177Lu-DOTA-C595 as a therapeutic radioimmunoconjugate for PDAC. Interestingly, there were no significant differences identified in the binding of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 between the two cell lines. Altering the specific activity may allow for this difference to be better identified. It is also speculated that this lack of difference may be due to the antibody being obstructed from accessing the target epitope due to the location of the chelation site and binding geometry of 64Cu to the p-SCN-Bn-DOTA molecule; however structural analysis of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 is needed to confirm this. Regardless, the binding of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 demonstrated an upward trend for both cell lines, suggesting total cell binding increases with concentration.
The difference in cellular binding between 177Lu-DOTA-C595 and 64Cu-DOTA-C595, as observed in this study, may impair the utility of using these radioimmunoconjugates for theranostic applications. Future work should consider more detailed in vivo investigations to compare the biodistribution of the 177Lu-DOTA-C595 and 64Cu-DOTA-C595 to further elucidate the theranostic potential against PDAC.

5. Conclusions

We have developed a C595 immunoconjugate for targeting MUC1-CE using the p-SCN-Bn-DOTA chelator. The DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate was optimised in terms of molar ratio, stability and binding affinity. Radiolabelling the DOTA-C595 conjugate with 64Cu and 177Lu was efficient and highlighted the exceptional radiolabelling capacity of the DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate to different radionuclides. However, radiolabelling to 99mTc and 68Ga demonstrated weak radiolabelling capacity which requires further optimisation. Both 64Cu-DOTA-C595 and 177Lu-DOTA-C595 showed effective cell binding, although only 177Lu-DOTA-C595 demonstrated preferential cell binding to MUC1-CE positive cells (p < 0.05 at concentrations of 100 nM and greater). These preliminary findings highlight the potential promise of C595-based radioimmunoconjugates for the diagnosis and treatment of PDAC.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11192983/s1, Figure S1: Examples of A, standard DOTA curve and B, standard protein curve used to quantify the molar ratio of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA to C595 antibody in the DOTA-C595 immunoconjugate; Figure S2: Difference in MUC1-CE expression across different pancreatic cancer cell lines. Image reused with permission from Hull et al. 22; Figure S3: Mass spectra of light chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 6.4) at 37 °C at A, day 0 and B, day 7; Figure S4: Mass spectra of heavy chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 6.4) at 37 °C at A, day 0 and B, day 7; Figure S5: Mass spectra of light chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) at 37 °C at A, day 0 and B, day 7; Figure S6: Mass spectra of heavy chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) at 37 °C at A, day 0 and B, day 7; Figure S7: Mass spectra of light chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in PBS (pH 7.4) at 4 °C at A, day 0 and B, day 30; Figure S8: Mass spectra of heavy chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in PBS (pH 7.4) at 4 °C at A, day 0 and B, day 30.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation: E.B.; methodology: A.H., Y.L., W.H., W.T., A.H.S., T.L.P. and E.B., software: A.H.; validation: A.H. and Y.L.; formal analysis: A.H., Y.L. and E.B.; investigation: A.H., Y.L., W.H., W.T., A.H.S. and T.L.P.; resources: A.H.S., T.L.P., W.H., W.T., D.B. and E.B.; data curation: A.H. and Y.L.; writing—original draft: A.H.; writing—review and editing: Y.L., W.H., W.T., A.H.S., T.L.P., D.B. and E.B.; visualisation: A.H. and Y.L.; supervision: E.B. and D.B.; project administration: A.H. and E.B.; funding acquisition: A.H., Y.L., W.H., D.B. and E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by a 2019 Avner Innovation Grant from PanKind, The Australian Pancreatic Cancer Foundation (https://pankind.org.au/ access on 1 September 2019). A.H. is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the University of South Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (ID number: 202278).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer Data in Australia; AIHW: Canberra, Australia, 2020.
  2. Sarantis, P.; Koustas, E.; Papadimitropoulou, A.; Papavassiliou, A.G.; Karamouzis, M.V. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Treatment hurdles, tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2020, 12, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kaur, S.; Baine, M.J.; Jain, M.; Sasson, A.R.; Batra, S.K. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Challenges and new developments. Biomark Med. 2012, 6, 597–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Oberstein, P.E.; Olive, K.P. Pancreatic cancer: Why is it so hard to treat? Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2013, 6, 321–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yoshii, Y.; Matsumoto, H.; Yoshimoto, M.; Oe, Y.; Zhang, M.R.; Nagatsu, K.; Sugyo, A.; Tsuji, A.B.; Higashi, T. 64Cu-intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy: A novel approach for adjuvant treatment in a clinically relevant preclinical model of pancreatic cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 1437–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suker, M.; Beumer, B.R.; Sadot, E.; Marthey, L.; Faris, J.E.; Mellon, E.A.; El-Rayes, B.F.; Wang-Gillam, A.; Lacy, J.; Hosein, P.J.; et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bourgeois, M.; Bailly, C.; Frindel, M.; Guerard, F.; Chérel, M.; Faivre-Chauvet, A.; Kraeber-Bodéré, F.; Bodet-Milin, C. Radioimmunoconjugates for treating cancer: Recent advances and current opportunities. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2017, 17, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, D.Y.; Li, K.C.P. Molecular theranostics: A primer for the imaging professional. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011, 197, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jones, W.; Griffiths, K.; Barata, P.C.; Paller, C.J. PSMA Theranostics: Review of the current status of PSMA-targeted imaging and radioligand therapy. Cancers 2020, 12, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Werner, R.A.; Weich, A.; Kircher, M.; Solnes, L.B.; Javadi, M.S.; Higuchi, T.; Buck, A.K.; Pomper, M.G.; Rowe, S.P.; Lapa, C. The theranostic promise for neuroendocrine tumors in the late 2010s—Where do we stand, where do we go? Theranostics 2018, 8, 6088–6100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Turner, J.H. Recent advances in theranostics and challenges for the future. Br. J. Radiol. 2018, 91, 20170893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bavelaar, B.M.; Lee, B.Q.; Gill, M.R.; Falzone, N.; Vallis, K.A. Subcellular targeting of theranostic radionuclides. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suh, H.; Pillai, K.; Morris, D.L. Mucins in pancreatic cancer: Biological role, implications in carcinogenesis and applications in diagnosis and therapy. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017, 7, 1372–1383. [Google Scholar]
  15. van Putten, J.P.M.; Strijbis, K. Transmembrane mucins: Signaling receptors at the intersection of inflammation and cancer. J. Innate Immun. 2017, 9, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Constantinou, P.E.; Danysh, B.P.; Dharmaraj, N.; Carson, D.D. Transmembrane mucins as novel therapeutic targets. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 6, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zotter, S. Tissue and tumor distribution of human polymorphic eptithelial mucin. Cancer Rev. 1988, 11, 55. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanisch, F.-G.; Müller, S. MUC1: The polymorphic appearance of a human mucin. Glycobiology 2000, 10, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gendler, S.J. MUC1, the renaissance molecule. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2001, 6, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Qu, C.; Li, Y.; Song, Y.; Rizvi, S.; Raja, C.; Zhang, D.; Samra, J.; Smith, R.; Perkins, A.C.; Apostolidis, C.; et al. MUC1 expression in primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer cells for in vitro treatment by 213Bi-C595 radioimmunoconjugate. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91, 2086–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qu, C.; Songl, Y.J.; Rizvi, S.M.A.; Li, Y.; Smith, R.; Perkins, A.C.; Morgenstern, A.; Brechbiel, M.W.; Allen, B.J. In vivo and in vitro inhibition of pancreatic cancer growth by targeted alpha therapy using 213Bi-CHX.A”-C595. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2005, 4, 848–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hull, A.; Li, Y.; Bartholomeusz, D.; Hsieh, W.; Escarbe, S.; Ruszkiewicz, A.; Bezak, E. The expression profile and textural characteristics of C595-reactive MUC1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma for targeted radionuclide therapy. Cancers 2020, 13, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gold, D.V.; Karanjawala, Z.; Modrak, D.E.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Hruban, R.H. PAM4-reactive MUC1 is a biomarker for early pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 7380–7387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tinder, T.L.; Subramani, D.B.; Basu, G.D.; Bradley, J.M.; Schettini, J.; Million, A.; Skaar, T.; Mukherjee, P. MUC1 enhances tumor progression and contributes toward immunosuppression in a mouse model of spontaneous pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 3116–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gendler, S.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Duhig, T.; Rothbard, J.; Burchell, J. A highly immunogenic region of a human polymorphic epithelial mucin expressed by carcinomas is made up of tandem repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 12820–12823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Price, M.R.; Pugh, J.A.; Hudecz, F.; Griffiths, W.; Jacobs, E.; Symonds, I.M.; Clarke, A.J.; Chan, W.; Baldwin, R.W. C595—A monoclonal antibody against the protein core of human urinary epithelial mucin commonly expressed in breast carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 1990, 61, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Price, M.R.; Hudecz, F.; O’Sullivan, C.; Baldwin, R.W.; Edwards, P.M.; Tendler, S.J. Immunological and structural features of the protein core of human polymorphic epithelial mucin. Mol. Immunol. 1990, 27, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Smaglo, B.G.; Aldeghaither, D.; Weiner, L.M. The development of immunoconjugates for targeted cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 11, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Ejeh, F.; Darby, J.M.; Thierry, B.; Brown, M.P. A simplified suite of methods to evaluate chelator conjugation of antibodies: Effects on hydrodynamic radius and biodistribution. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009, 36, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delage, J.A.; Faivre-Chauvet, A.; Barbet, J.; Fierle, J.K.; Schaefer, N.; Coukos, G.; Viertl, D.; Dunn, S.M.; Gnesin, S.; Prior, J.O. Impact of DOTA Conjugation on Pharmacokinetics and Immunoreactivity of [177Lu]Lu-1C1m-Fc, an Anti TEM-1 Fusion Protein Antibody in a TEM-1 Positive Tumor Mouse Model. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. De León-Rodríguez, L.M.; Kovacs, Z. The synthesis and chelation chemistry of DOTA-peptide conjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Price, E.W.; Orvig, C. Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 260–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mueller, B.M.; Wrasidlo, W.A.; Reisfeld, R.A. Determination of the number of e-amino groups available for conjugation of effector molecules to monoclonal antibodies. Hybridoma 1988, 7, 453–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dennler, P.; Fischer, E.; Schibli, R. Antibody conjugates: From heterogeneous populations to defined reagents. Antibodies 2015, 4, 197–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thakral, P.; Singla, S.; Yadav, M.P.; Vasisht, A.; Sharma, A.; Gupta, S.K.; Bal, C.; Snehlata; Malhotra, A. An approach for conjugation of (177) Lu- DOTA-SCN- Rituximab (BioSim) & its evaluation for radioimmunotherapy of relapsed & refractory B-cell non Hodgkins lymphoma patients. Indian J. Med. Res. 2014, 139, 544–554. [Google Scholar]
  36. Konermann, L. Addressing a common misconception: Ammonium acetate as neutral pH “buffer” for native electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 28, 1827–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mitchell, B.L.; Yasui, Y.; Li, C.I.; Fitzpatrick, A.L.; Lampe, P.D. Impact of freeze-thaw cycles and storage time on plasma samples used in mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery projects. Cancer Inform. 2005, 1, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zeglis, B.M.; Lewis, J.S. A practical guide to the construction of radiometallated bioconjugates for positron emission tomography. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 6168–6195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kilian, K. 68Ga-DOTA and analogs: Current status and future perspectives. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 2014, 19, S13–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, S. Bifunctional coupling agents for radiolabeling of biomolecules and target-specific delivery of metallic radionuclides. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1347–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spang, P.; Herrmann, C.; Roesch, F. Bifunctional gallium-68 chelators: Past, present, and future. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2016, 46, 373–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferreira, C.L.; Lamsa, E.; Woods, M.; Duan, Y.; Fernando, P.; Bensimon, C.; Kordos, M.; Guenther, K.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G.E. Evaluation of bifunctional chelates for the development of gallium-based radiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cooper, M.S.; Ma, M.T.; Sunassee, K.; Shaw, K.P.; Williams, J.D.; Paul, R.L.; Donnelly, P.S.; Blower, P.J. Comparison of 64Cu-complexing bifunctional chelators for radioimmunoconjugation: Labeling efficiency, specific activity and in vitro/in vivo stability. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Mass spectra of the light chains of (A) unmodified C595 and (B) p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate.
Figure 1. Mass spectra of the light chains of (A) unmodified C595 and (B) p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate.
Cells 11 02983 g001
Figure 2. Mass spectra of the heavy chains of (A), unmodified C595 and (B), p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate.
Figure 2. Mass spectra of the heavy chains of (A), unmodified C595 and (B), p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate.
Cells 11 02983 g002
Figure 3. Mass spectra of light chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) at 4 °C at (A) day 0, (B) day 7 and (C) day 30.
Figure 3. Mass spectra of light chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) at 4 °C at (A) day 0, (B) day 7 and (C) day 30.
Cells 11 02983 g003
Figure 4. Mass spectra of heavy chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) at 4 °C at (A) day 0, (B) day 7 and (C) day 30.
Figure 4. Mass spectra of heavy chain p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 conjugate stored in 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) at 4 °C at (A) day 0, (B) day 7 and (C) day 30.
Cells 11 02983 g004
Figure 5. ELISA assay comparing the binding affinity of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 and unmodified C595 to MUC1 peptide at 405 nm absorbance.
Figure 5. ELISA assay comparing the binding affinity of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA-C595 and unmodified C595 to MUC1 peptide at 405 nm absorbance.
Cells 11 02983 g005
Figure 6. (A) HPLC radio-chromatogram of 64Cu-DOTA-C595. Region 1 (red) represents 64Cu-DOTA-C595 and (B) ITLC radio-chromatogram of 177Lu-DOTA-C595. Region 1 (red) represents 177Lu-DOTA-C595. Region 2 (green) represents free 177Lu.
Figure 6. (A) HPLC radio-chromatogram of 64Cu-DOTA-C595. Region 1 (red) represents 64Cu-DOTA-C595 and (B) ITLC radio-chromatogram of 177Lu-DOTA-C595. Region 1 (red) represents 177Lu-DOTA-C595. Region 2 (green) represents free 177Lu.
Cells 11 02983 g006
Figure 7. Cell binding (1 × 105 cells) of (A) 177Lu-DOTA-C595 and (B) 64Cu-DOTA-C595 to PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cell lines. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 7. Cell binding (1 × 105 cells) of (A) 177Lu-DOTA-C595 and (B) 64Cu-DOTA-C595 to PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cell lines. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Cells 11 02983 g007
Figure 8. Blocking experiment demonstrating the binding of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 to PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells following C595-blocking. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 8. Blocking experiment demonstrating the binding of 64Cu-DOTA-C595 to PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells following C595-blocking. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Cells 11 02983 g008
Figure 9. Radiolabelling efficiency using radio-ITLC for radiolabelling of (A) 177Lu and (B) 64Cu to 120-day old DOTA-C595.
Figure 9. Radiolabelling efficiency using radio-ITLC for radiolabelling of (A) 177Lu and (B) 64Cu to 120-day old DOTA-C595.
Cells 11 02983 g009
Figure 10. Repeated cell binding assays performed using (A) stored 177Lu-DOTA-C595 and (B) stored 64Cu-DOTA-C595. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 10. Repeated cell binding assays performed using (A) stored 177Lu-DOTA-C595 and (B) stored 64Cu-DOTA-C595. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Cells 11 02983 g010
Table 1. Chemical and physical properties of radionuclides commonly used as radioimmunoconjugates.
Table 1. Chemical and physical properties of radionuclides commonly used as radioimmunoconjugates.
RadionuclideHalf-Life (T1/2)Primary Decay Mode and Maximum Energy (MeV)Clinical Application
99mTc6 h γ = 0.140 Diagnostic SPECT
68Ga68 minβ+ = 1.89 Diagnostic PET
177Lu6.7 dγ = 0.208; β− = 0.497 Therapeutic
64Cu12.1 hβ+ = 0.653; β− = 0.578 Diagnostic PET; Therapeutic
225Ac9.9 d α = 8.40Therapeutic
Table 2. Effect of changing molar-excess on the average number of DOTA chelators per antibody.
Table 2. Effect of changing molar-excess on the average number of DOTA chelators per antibody.
Molar Excess of p-SCN-Bn-DOTAAverage Number of Chelators Attached per Antibody
20-fold3.00
40-fold3.83
50-fold4.50
100-fold6.17
Table 3. Radiolabelling yield and radiochemical purity of radioimmunoconjugates.
Table 3. Radiolabelling yield and radiochemical purity of radioimmunoconjugates.
RadioimmunoconjugateRadiolabelling Yield (%) (ITLC)Radiochemical Purity (%) (HPLC)
99mTc-DOTA-C59593-
68Ga-DOTA-C59550-
177Lu-DOTA-C5959396
64Cu-DOTA-C595>99>99
Table 4. Cell binding results.
Table 4. Cell binding results.
Radioimmunoconjugate Concentration (nM)177Lu-DOTA-C59564Cu-DOTA-C595
PANC-1 CPM
(Mean ± S.D.)
AsPC-1 CPM
(Mean ± S.D.)
p-ValuePANC-1 CPM
(Mean ± S.D.)
AsPC-1 CPM
(Mean ± S.D.)
p-Value
07.033 ± 39.11−12.33 ± 16.700.4743431704 ± 15.811644 ± 47.370.103428
101916 ± 139047.33 ± 14.300.0803835515 ± 18803571 ± 560.00.160980
503723 ± 206.5656.7 ± 767.90.013368 *10,433 ± 36555167 ± 895.50.072480
1005493 ± 771.7962.7 ± 905.40.002738 **16,846 ± 48197363 ± 27350.041383
20013,293 ± 10782068 ± 13060.000328 ***21,949 ± 577615,969 ± 42460.221960
30021,337 ± 237.62867 ± 933.40.001357 **24,477 ± 150516,613 ± 22590.007389
400---33,484 ± 461823,377 ± 45060.053370
50024,354 ± 34855723 ± 22420.004905 **38,833 ± 454.427,083 ± 75480.054576
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; CPM = counts per minute, S.D. = standard deviation.
Table 5. Coordination features of the radionuclides. Adapted from Price and Orvig [31].
Table 5. Coordination features of the radionuclides. Adapted from Price and Orvig [31].
RadionuclideChargeCoordination Number/GeometryIonic Radii (Å)
99mTc+4 VI, distorted octahedral0.65
68Ga+3VI, distorted octahedral 0.62
177Lu+3VIII, square antiprism 0.98
64Cu+2VI, distorted octahedral 0.73
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hull, A.; Li, Y.; Bartholomeusz, D.; Hsieh, W.; Tieu, W.; Pukala, T.L.; Staudacher, A.H.; Bezak, E. Preliminary Development and Testing of C595 Radioimmunoconjugates for Targeting MUC1 Cancer Epitopes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cells 2022, 11, 2983. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11192983

AMA Style

Hull A, Li Y, Bartholomeusz D, Hsieh W, Tieu W, Pukala TL, Staudacher AH, Bezak E. Preliminary Development and Testing of C595 Radioimmunoconjugates for Targeting MUC1 Cancer Epitopes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cells. 2022; 11(19):2983. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11192983

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hull, Ashleigh, Yanrui Li, Dylan Bartholomeusz, William Hsieh, William Tieu, Tara L. Pukala, Alexander H. Staudacher, and Eva Bezak. 2022. "Preliminary Development and Testing of C595 Radioimmunoconjugates for Targeting MUC1 Cancer Epitopes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma" Cells 11, no. 19: 2983. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11192983

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop