Next Article in Journal
Fermentation Quality of Round-Bale Silage as Affected by Additives and Ensiling Seasons in Dwarf Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach)
Previous Article in Journal
Weed Suppression and Performance of Grain Legumes Following an Irrigated Rice Crop in Southern Australia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simulating the Probability of Grain Sorghum Maturity before the First Frost in Northeastern Colorado
Open AccessArticle

Climate-Optimized Planting Windows for Cotton in the Lower Mississippi Delta Region

Crop Production Systems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
Agricultural Systems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, CO 80525, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Philippe Debaeke
Agronomy 2016, 6(4), 46;
Received: 14 July 2016 / Revised: 14 September 2016 / Accepted: 23 September 2016 / Published: 29 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Practical Use of Crop Models in Agronomy)
Unique, variable summer climate of the lower Mississippi (MS) Delta region poses a critical challenge to cotton producers in deciding when to plant for optimized production. Traditional 2–4 year agronomic field trials conducted in this area fail to capture the effects of long-term climate variabilities in the location for developing reliable planting windows for producers. Our objective was to integrate a four-year planting-date field experiment conducted at Stoneville, MS during 2005–2008 with long-term climate data in an agricultural system model and develop optimum planting windows for cotton under both irrigated and rainfed conditions. Weather data collected at this location from 1960 to 2015 and the CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton v4.6 model within the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM2) were used. The cotton model was able to simulate both the variable planting date and variable water regimes reasonably well: relative errors of seed cotton yield, aboveground biomass, and leaf area index (LAI) were 14%, 12%, and 21% under rainfed conditions and 8%, 16%, and 15% under irrigated conditions, respectively. Planting windows under both rainfed and irrigated conditions extended from mid-March to mid-June: windows from mid-March to the last week of May under rainfed conditions, and from the last week of April to the end of May under irrigated conditions were better suited for optimum yield returns. Within these windows, rainfed cotton tends to lose yield from later plantings, but irrigated cotton benefits; however, irrigation requirements increase as the planting windows advance in time. Irrigated cotton produced about 1000 kg·ha−1 seed cotton more than rainfed cotton, with irrigation water requirements averaging 15 cm per season. Under rainfed conditions, there is a 5%, 14%, and 27% chance that the seed cotton production is below 1000, 1500, and 2000 kg·ha−1, respectively. Information developed in this paper can help MS farmers in decision support for cotton planting. View Full-Text
Keywords: agricultural system model; planting window; Mississippi Delta; irrigation; rainfed cropping systems agricultural system model; planting window; Mississippi Delta; irrigation; rainfed cropping systems
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Anapalli, S.S.; Pettigrew, W.T.; Reddy, K.N.; Ma, L.; Fisher, D.K.; Sui, R. Climate-Optimized Planting Windows for Cotton in the Lower Mississippi Delta Region. Agronomy 2016, 6, 46.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop