Next Article in Journal
Detection of NAM-A1 Natural Variants in Bread Wheat Reveals Differences in Haplotype Distribution between a Worldwide Core Collection and European Elite Germplasm
Previous Article in Journal
Barley Leaf Area and Leaf Growth Rates Are Maximized during the Pre-Anthesis Phase
Article

Benefits of Precision Farming Technologies for Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean and Sugar Beet—Comparison of Precision Hoeing with Conventional Mechanical Weed Control

Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Rakesh S. Chandran
Agronomy 2015, 5(2), 130-142; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5020130
Received: 13 March 2015 / Revised: 8 April 2015 / Accepted: 17 April 2015 / Published: 23 April 2015
Weed infestations and associated yield losses require effective weed control measures in soybean and sugar beet. Besides chemical weed control, mechanical weeding plays an important role in integrated weed management systems. Field experiments were conducted at three locations for soybean in 2013 and 2014 and at four locations for sugar beet in 2014 to investigate if automatic steering technologies for inter-row weed hoeing using a camera or RTK-GNSS increase weed control efficacy, efficiency and crop yield. Treatments using precision farming technologies were compared with conventional weed control strategies. Weed densities in the experiments ranged from 15 to 154 plants m−2 with Chenopodium album, Polygonum convolvulus, Polygonum aviculare, Matricaria chamomilla and Lamium purpureum being the most abundant species. Weed hoeing using automatic steering technologies reduced weed densities in soybean by 89% and in sugar beet by 87% compared to 85% weed control efficacy in soybean and sugar beet with conventional weeding systems. Speed of weed hoeing could be increased from 4 km h−1 with conventional hoes to 7 and 10 km·h−1, when automatic steering systems were used. Precision hoeing technologies increased soybean yield by 23% and sugar beet yield by 37%. After conventional hoeing and harrowing, soybean yields were increased by 28% and sugar beet yield by 26%. View Full-Text
Keywords: mechanical weed control; automatic steering systems; sensor technologies; integrated weed management mechanical weed control; automatic steering systems; sensor technologies; integrated weed management
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kunz, C.; Weber, J.F.; Gerhards, R. Benefits of Precision Farming Technologies for Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean and Sugar Beet—Comparison of Precision Hoeing with Conventional Mechanical Weed Control. Agronomy 2015, 5, 130-142. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5020130

AMA Style

Kunz C, Weber JF, Gerhards R. Benefits of Precision Farming Technologies for Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean and Sugar Beet—Comparison of Precision Hoeing with Conventional Mechanical Weed Control. Agronomy. 2015; 5(2):130-142. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5020130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kunz, Christoph, Jonas F. Weber, and Roland Gerhards. 2015. "Benefits of Precision Farming Technologies for Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean and Sugar Beet—Comparison of Precision Hoeing with Conventional Mechanical Weed Control" Agronomy 5, no. 2: 130-142. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5020130

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop