Next Article in Journal
Mn’s Key Roles in Plant Ecophysiology—A Comprehensive Review for Unstressed and Stress Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanisms of Drought Stress Response in Medicago ruthenica: Insights from Transcriptome Analysis and Functional Validation of Key Genes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biochar Herbicide Protection Pods for Mitigating Herbicide Sensitivity in Tomato Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Do Intercropped Legumes Alter Weed Communities in Organic Field Crops? A Taxonomic and Functional Perspective

1
Agriculture and Agri-Food Research Institute, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Notre-Dame-du-Nord, QC J0Z 3B0, Canada
2
Quebec Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Québec, QC G1V 2J3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2026, 16(7), 708; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16070708
Submission received: 31 October 2025 / Revised: 17 February 2026 / Accepted: 3 March 2026 / Published: 27 March 2026

Abstract

Transitioning from traditional to organic production is gaining popularity worldwide with significant challenges including weed management. We evaluated how legumes sown as cover crops in a synchronous intercropping (SI) system with organic oat (Avena sativa) as the main crop impacted weed communities. A split-plot design was set up on a farm in Poularies (Quebec, Canada) to compare Melilotus officinalis, Trifolium incarnatum, Trifolium repens and a control without legumes for two years (2019–2020). We determined the botanical composition, calculated diversity indices, and measured plant functional traits. Species richness was similar (S = 5.5 ± 0.4) across treatments in 2019, but higher in the control (S = 12.2 ± 2.6) and lower (S = 6.0 ± 1.2) under T. incarnatum in 2020. Shannon diversity was lower in 2019 (H′ = 1.49 ± 0.07) than in 2020 (H′ = 1.99 ± 0.04), and higher under the control (H′ = 1.87 ± 0.05) than under T. incarnatum (H′ = 1.46 ± 0.04). Weeds under T. incarnatum had a high specific leaf area and a resource-acquisition strategy, while those in the control had a higher leaf dry matter content and a resource-conservation strategy. Our study brings novel results on the use of legumes in SI systems to control weeds. Using T. incarnatum in a SI system with oat had the greatest capacity to cover the ground, control weeds and reduce their diversity, but this species and the acquisitive weeds in this treatment could compete with the main crop. Future research should evaluate the quantity and quality of yields to complete this ecological study and give appropriate agronomic recommendations. Our results could provide agronomists and farmers with indications on the level of competition weeds exert on the cropping system depending on the SI treatment.
Keywords: weed species; legume cover crops; synchronous intercropping; organic oats; taxonomic analysis; functional traits; agroecology weed species; legume cover crops; synchronous intercropping; organic oats; taxonomic analysis; functional traits; agroecology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chida, I.; Ziadi, N.; Poirier, V. Do Intercropped Legumes Alter Weed Communities in Organic Field Crops? A Taxonomic and Functional Perspective. Agronomy 2026, 16, 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16070708

AMA Style

Chida I, Ziadi N, Poirier V. Do Intercropped Legumes Alter Weed Communities in Organic Field Crops? A Taxonomic and Functional Perspective. Agronomy. 2026; 16(7):708. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16070708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chida, Insaf, Noura Ziadi, and Vincent Poirier. 2026. "Do Intercropped Legumes Alter Weed Communities in Organic Field Crops? A Taxonomic and Functional Perspective" Agronomy 16, no. 7: 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16070708

APA Style

Chida, I., Ziadi, N., & Poirier, V. (2026). Do Intercropped Legumes Alter Weed Communities in Organic Field Crops? A Taxonomic and Functional Perspective. Agronomy, 16(7), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16070708

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop