Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Corn Pest and Disease Recognition through Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
GLD-Det: Guava Leaf Disease Detection in Real-Time Using Lightweight Deep Learning Approach Based on MobileNet
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/agronomy13092241
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Fine Mapping of Osdsm3, a Drought-Sensitive Gene in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

by
Chenwei Deng
1,
Yingxin Zhang
1,
Beifang Wang
1,
Hong Wang
1,
Pao Xue
1,
Yongrun Cao
1,
Lianping Sun
1,
Shihua Cheng
1,
Liyong Cao
1,2,3 and
Daibo Chen
1,*
1
Key Laboratory for Zhejiang Super Rice Research, Chinese National Center for Rice Improvement, State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311401, China
2
Northern Rice Research Center of China National Rice Research Institute, Baoqing 155600, China
3
National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(9), 2241; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092241
Submission received: 29 July 2023 / Revised: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 25 August 2023 / Published: 26 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Drought poses a significant constraint on rice production, and, in this study, we have discovered a novel drought-sensitive mutant, designated as dsm3, arising from the progenies of indica rice variety Zhonghui8015 treated with ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS). Under drought stress conditions, dsm3 exhibited characteristic withered leaf tips, accompanied by increased levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2, a reduced net photosynthetic rate (Pn), and decreased activity of peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Genetic analysis revealed that the withered leaf tip phenotype was governed by a single recessive gene, designated as Osdsm3. To begin with, Osdsm3 was initially mapped to the short arm of chromosome 1 through a cross involving dsm3 and 02428. Subsequently, utilizing a population of 2591 F2 individuals, we narrowed down the location of Osdsm3 to a 78 Kb interval, encompassing 13 open reading frames (ORFs). Sequencing analysis unveiled a mutation (1275G → A) in the exon of the candidate gene (LOC_Os01g10680), leading to premature translation termination. Moreover, a quantitative RT-PCR assay demonstrated a high expression of OsDSM3 in the panicle and sheath, with a significant upregulation of drought-stress-related genes under drought conditions. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that Osdsm3 shares evolutionary homology with UNE1, an intracellular transport protein found in Arabidopsis thaliana. Subcellular studies further confirmed that OsDSM3 resides in the cytoplasm. In conclusion, the forthcoming cloning of Osdsm3 holds promise for delving deeper into the molecular mechanisms governing rice drought resistance.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a crucial crop that sustains more than half of the global population. However, drought stress stands as a prominent abiotic factor hindering rice yields, especially with the challenges of global warming and water scarcity [1]. Drought stress disrupts the delicate balance between water and carbon metabolism in rice, leading to osmotic disorders, reduced photosynthetic rates, and, ultimately, diminished rice yields [2]. Identifying drought-tolerant genes is of paramount importance for both rice breeding and comprehensive molecular mechanism investigations.
Drought tolerance in rice primarily involves adaptive changes in root structure, osmotic adjustment, and antioxidant enzyme activities [3]. Under drought stress, rice experiences alterations in root architecture, including enhanced root–shoot ratios, an increased fence–sponge tissue ratio, and thicker cuticles. These changes collectively minimize water loss, thus enhancing drought resistance [4,5]. As drought stress progresses, the number of nodal roots decreases, while the lateral root branching density increases, along with the elongation of the total lateral root length [6,7]. Additionally, rice plants maintain cell osmolarity balance through osmotic adjustment substances like glycine betaine, trehalose, and soluble sugars during drought conditions [8]. Drought stress diminishes the activity of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, POD, and CAT, leading to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and resulting in cell metabolic disorders [9]. To mitigate the toxicity of excessive ROS, plants employ antioxidant enzymes like SOD and POD to scavenge the reactive oxygen species during drought stress [10].
Drought is a critical factor that hinders plant growth, impacting various stages of rice development and affecting both yields and quality [11]. To address production losses caused by drought stress, identifying drought-resistant genes and cultivating resilient rice varieties prove effective. Currently, researchers have isolated some drought-tolerant genes related to rice [12], categorized primarily into functional genes [13] and regulatory genes [14]. These genes participate in osmotic regulation, dehydration resistance, and antioxidant protection during drought stress [15]. For instance, OsCPK9, a rice CDPK gene, was identified as enhancing drought tolerance by improving osmotic regulation and promoting stomatal closure [16]. Another significant discovery was the OsTPKb gene, which is responsible for encoding a dual-pore potassium channel protein. This protein maintains a normal K+ balance inside cells, thereby enhancing drought tolerance [17]. The OsNHX1 (Na+/H+ Antiporter 1) gene plays a crucial role in ion balance regulation, affecting the concentration of intracellular sodium ions and increasing rice’s drought tolerance. Moreover, dehydration, a morphological response to drought stress, involves the waxy layer on the plant surface limiting the transpiration rate, contributing to enhanced drought resistance [18]. Additionally, the WSL4 gene, which is responsible for encoding a β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase, has been identified as a key player in the synthesis of rice leaf cuticular wax. An elevated expression of this gene results in increased leaf cuticular wax content, which in turn reduces water loss and enhances drought resistance [19]. Furthermore, under drought stress, plants accumulate ROS that can damage cellular structures and cause injuries. Antioxidant enzymes play a vital role in clearing ROS and mitigating plant damage. In one study, it was observed that the expression levels of the peroxidase genes, namely OsPOX8.1 and OsPOX22.3, exhibited an increase in response to drought-induced stress [20]. In a related study, the OsAPX2 gene was found to encode a cell solute ascorbate peroxidase, which, when overexpressed, significantly reduces ROS levels. This overexpression positively regulates rice’s drought tolerance [21]. Abcisic acid (ABA), a crucial hormone in plant responses to abiotic stress, also plays a vital role in drought response and regulation. A drought-responsive gene called OsEm1 has been identified as enhancing rice’s sensitivity to ABA, positively regulating drought resistance [22]. The OsFBX257 gene, which is responsible for encoding an F-Box protein, plays a crucial role in enhancing ABA signaling. The gene’s function and expression level have a significant impact on both root and shoot development, and it can also influence rice drought stress tolerance in controlled environments [23]. OsbZIP23 and OsbZIP72 are considered key regulators in ABA-dependent drought and salt stress responses. They control the expression of many stress-related genes and increase both ABA sensitivity and drought and salt resistance in rice [13,24,25]. Additionally, key enzyme genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and metabolism, such as OsLCY and OsNCED4, respond to rice drought stress by controlling the synthesis of ABA precursors [26,27]. Additionally, the NAC transcription factors in rice are significant players in responding to abiotic stress, with several NAC members involved in the response to drought stress. For instance, the upregulation of the stress-responsive gene SNAC1 markedly enhances drought resistance in transgenic rice, even under severe drought conditions during the reproductive phase, without affecting yields [28]. Lastly, PP2C protein phosphatases in plants have broad involvement in growth, development, and responses to biotic and abiotic stress, including disease resistance, wound response, and ABA-mediated stress signaling [29]. The OsPP2C gene family plays a crucial role in rice’s response to drought stress, with OsPP2C77, OsPP2C51, and OsPP2C49 confirmed to be involved in drought stress signal transduction. These discoveries shed light on the intricate mechanisms that contribute to rice’s ability to cope with drought stress [30,31,32]. Overall, comprehending the functions of these drought-resistant genes and their regulatory mechanisms offers valuable insights to bolster rice’s capacity to withstand drought stress, leading to enhanced crop yields and quality.
Drought resistance is an exceedingly complex trait, intricately linked to the genetic background, growth and development, and environmental changes in rice. Despite the identification and cloning of numerous genes associated with drought resistance in rice, the signaling pathways and regulatory networks related to drought resistance are not yet fully understood, and the molecular mechanisms underlying drought resistance require further exploration. Furthermore, most of the reported drought resistance genes originate from the common rice varieties that are not widely used in the current market, posing some distance from practical production. Our focus centers on a widely adopted high-yield rice restoration line, which is poised for seamless integration into contemporary rice production methods. In this study, we conducted the screening and characterization of a drought-sensitive mutant, followed by precise mapping to identify the candidate gene. Our findings contribute to a novel gene resource for breeding programs and facilitate investigations into the molecular mechanisms underlying drought resilience in rice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The drought-sensitive mutant (dsm3) was screened and identified from the mutant library of the indica rice cultivar Zhonghui8015 (ZH8015) treated with EMS (ethyl methanesulfonate). To conduct genetic analysis and gene mapping, a total of 2591 F2 individuals were generated through a cross between dsm3 and 02428, which is a dwarf, widely compatible japonica rice variety developed through the hybridization of the radiation-induced progeny of the local Yunnan rice variety “Pangxiegu” with the radiation-induced progeny of the local Shanghai rice variety “Jibanggu” in China [33].
From 2017 to 2019, all plants were cultivated in an experimental field at the China National Rice Research Institute (Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China) with a row spacing of 16.5 cm × 21.5 cm.

2.2. Measurement of Agronomic Traits

Both ZH8015 and dsm3 plants were grown as described above. At the maturation stage, ten plants from the middle of each line were randomly selected for measuring agronomic traits. The measured traits included the plant height, panicle length, grain length and width, thousand-grain weight, leaf length, and leaf width.

2.3. Drought Stress Treatments

To assess the drought tolerance of ZH8015 and dsm3, we conducted a modified drought stress treatment in the greenhouse of the China National Rice Research Institute in 2019 [34]. Germinated seeds were sown on a petri dish, and 7-day-old seedlings were then transplanted into plastic pots filled with 3 kg of sandy soil, which was irrigated daily. Subsequently, 7-week-old seedlings of ZH8015 and dsm3 were subjected to varying durations of drought stress, including 0 (Control Check, CK), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 days. After the treatments, we collected samples of the second upper leaves, root system, and aboveground parts of all materials for determining physiological indices and conducting phenotype analysis. Additionally, the soil water content was measured using the weighing method reported in the literature [35].

2.4. Histochemical and Physiological Analysis

To detect ROS accumulation, we followed previously reported methods [36]. For cell death detection, we detached the second upper leaves from the plants and stained them with a 1 mg/mL solution of 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and a 0.25% solution of Evans blue (EB). After staining, the leaves were incubated with 95% ethanol at 85–90 °C until the chlorophyll was completely removed [37]. To determine cell size, we immersed 1 cm root tips of ZH8015 and dsm3 in a solution containing 1 μL of NerveRed (US EVERBRIGHT INC, Suzhou, China) and 1 mL of sterile water, allowing them to stand for 0.5 h on ice under dark conditions. We followed the manufacturing instructions of NerveRed C2 (Item No: N4073) and captured images using a laser confocal scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM700, MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE, Colone, Germany). The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of the second upper leaves of ZH8015 and dsm3 was determined using a portable photosynthesis measurement device, LI-6400 (Li-COR, Lincoln, NB, USA), with an intensity of 1200 μmol protons (m2·s) and an airflow rate of 500 μmol·s−1 under drought stress. Chlorophyll was extracted from the second upper leaf tissues and determined via spectrophotometry as described previously [14]. Additionally, we determined the activity of SOD and POD, as well as the content of MDA, H2O2, soluble sugar, total protein, and proline using commercial assay kits from the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute (China).

2.5. Primer Design and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of recessive individuals using the CTAB method as previously described [38]. New SSR and InDel markers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software. The PCRs were performed using 2 × Taq PCR Mix from TsingKe technology company (Hangzhou, China), and the PCR products were visualized on an 8.0% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The primers used for the PCR are listed in Table S1.

2.6. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNAs were extracted using the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using a ReverTra Ace qRT-PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Japan). qRT-PCR was performed using an SYBR premix Ex Taq II (Takala, Japan) on the LightCycler 480 II (Roche, Sweden). UBQ was used as a reference gene. qRT-PCR was conducted to measure the expression levels of eight genes related to drought stress, OsbZIP23 [13], OsbZIP72 [24], POX22.3, POX8.1 [39], OsLCY [26], OsNCED 4 [27], OsPP2C [30], and OsSNAC1 [28]. The cycle threshold (Ct) 2−ΔΔCt method was used to analyze the relative gene expression. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S2.

2.7. Sequence Analysis

The open reading frames (ORFs) and full-length nucleotide sequences of Osdsm3 were subjected to analysis using bioinformatics tools available on the websites RGAP (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/, accessed on 24 August 2023) and NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 24 August 2023). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence alignments were performed using MEGALIGN version 6 and SEQMAN version 6. Additionally, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA version 7.

2.8. Subcellular Localization

The CDS of Osdsm3 was cloned into the pYBA-1132-GFP vector without a termination codon, creating a fusion vector between Osdsm3 and GFP. The fusion construct 35S::DSM3-GFP and a control vector 35S::GFP were introduced into rice protoplasts using the 40% PEG 6000-mediated method and incubated at 28 °C for 24 h under dark conditions. Confocal imaging was captured using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 700, Jena, Germany).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance. All trials were performed in three independent biological replicates and three technical replicates. The significant differences among various treatments are denoted by “*” at p < 0.05 and “**” at p < 0.01. Error bars represent the means ± SD (n = 3).

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of the dsm3 Mutant

The drought-sensitive mutant, dsm3, is a dwarf leaf-tip-withering variant selected from the indica rice variety ZH8015 after EMS chemical mutagenesis in the M1 generation under field drought conditions. Under normal conditions, the mutant exhibits a reduced plant height compared to the wild-type ZH8015, with no other discernible phenotypic differences (Figure S1). However, under drought stress, the dsm3 mutant displayed a gradual withering of the leaf tip at the tillering stage, starting 60 days after sowing (Figure 1A). Subsequently, the withered proportion extended along the leaf vein from the distal axis end to the proximal axis (Figure 1B). At the heading and maturation stages, the withering became more severe (Figure 1C,D). The appearance of the withered leaf tip phenotype constrained the growth and development of dsm3, leading to reduced agronomic traits, including a decrease in the thousand-grain weight and panicle length (Figure 1E, Table 1). Additionally, there were significant reductions in the plant height, grain width, grain length–width ratio, flag leaf length, second upper leaf width, and third upper leaf width in dsm3 compared to ZH8015 at the mature stage. However, there were no significant differences in the number of effective tillerings (Table 1). These findings suggest that the withered leaf tip in dsm3 may be one of the limiting factors affecting its growth, development, and rice yield.

3.2. Sensitivity of dsm3 to Drought Stress

To assess the response to drought stress, ZH8015 and dsm3 plants were subjected to irrigation cessation from 0 to 6 days after sowing at day 46. The withered leaf tip phenotype of dsm3 emerged after 2 days of treatment and worsened with prolonged exposure, while ZH8015 did not exhibit such symptoms (Figure 2A). During the treatment period from 0 to 4 days, both ZH8015 and dsm3 experienced gradual reductions in the maximum root length and root–shoot ratio (Figure 2B,C,E). Notably, dsm3 displayed a significant decrease in the maximum root length after 2 days of treatment (Figure 2C). Despite the similar decline in the soil relative moisture content in both ZH8015 and dsm3 (Figure 2D), the inhibited root growth in dsm3 suggested its sensitivity to dehydration stress. Furthermore, the significant reduction in the soil relative moisture of ZH8015 after 4 days of treatment indirectly indicated a decrease in the root water use efficiency of dsm3 (Figure 2E). This suggests that differences in root water use efficiency between ZH8015 and dsm3 may have contributed to the observed significant decrease in maximum root length and root–shoot ratio in dsm3. Additionally, this study examined the activities of SOD and POD, as well as the content of total protein and MDA. The results revealed that the total protein content in dsm3 peaked after 2 days and subsequently declined (Figure 2F), mirroring a similar trend observed in both POD and SOD levels (Figure 2G,I). ZH8015 showed stronger activities of POD and SOD and higher total protein content compared to the dsm3 mutant under drought stress (Figure 2G,I). Conversely, there was a significant increase in the MDA content of dsm3 compared to ZH8015 (Figure 2H). The changes in phenotypic and physiological indicators indicated the sensitivity of dsm3 to drought stress.

3.3. Abnormal H2O2 Accumulation, Cell Death, and Altered Cell Size in the Root Apical Meristem of the dsm3 Mutant

We hypothesized that the withered leaf tip of dsm3 resulted from an accumulation of H2O2 leading to cell death. Evans blue staining revealed numerous blue spots in dsm3 after staining, indicating a significant accumulation of dead cells compared to ZH8015 (Figure 3A). Additionally, DAB staining demonstrated a much stronger H2O2 accumulation in dsm3 leaves compared to ZH8015 after staining (Figure 3B). To assess cell size, we treated the root tips of ZH8015 and dsm3 with NerveRed, a fluorescent dye, and examined them using a laser confocal scanning microscope (Figure 3C). The results revealed that the root apical meristem cells of ZH8015 and dsm3 were closely arranged, while the root apical meristem cells of dsm3 appeared narrower and shorter. This finding explains why ZH8015 exhibited a longer maximum root length compared to dsm3.

3.4. Evaluation of Photosynthetic and Physiological Indicators under Drought Stress

Drought stress disrupts the carbon metabolism balance in plant cells, negatively affecting photosynthesis [40]. To assess this, we measured the photosynthetic pigment content and net photosynthetic rate (Pn). Under drought stress, dsm3 leaves exhibited a significant reduction in Chla content and Pn compared to ZH8015 (Figure 4A,B). Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentration in dsm3 leaves (Figure 4C). Next, we measured various indicators in ZH8015 and dsm3 at the tillering stage under drought stress, including the total protein, proline, MDA, H2O2, soluble sugar, and the activities of SOD and POD. The results indicated substantially higher levels of proline, MDA, and H2O2 in dsm3 compared to ZH8015 (Figure 4F–H), while dsm3 exhibited a lower total protein content than ZH8015 (Figure 4E). Additionally, the soluble sugar content and POD activity were significantly decreased in dsm3 compared to ZH8015, while the SOD activity also exhibited a notable reduction (Figure 4I–K). Based on these findings, we postulate that the reduced activities of SOD and POD in dsm3 may hinder the scavenging of oxidative metabolites, leading to the disruption of the cell membrane integrity, cell death, and a weakened drought tolerance.

3.5. Genetic Analysis and Fine Mapping of Osdsm3

In the F1 generation resulting from the cross between dsm3 and 02428, all individuals exhibited a normal phenotype. The segregation ratios in the F2 population followed a 3:1 pattern, with c2 = 2.64 < c20.05 = 3.84 (Table 2), indicating that the phenotype of dsm3 was governed by a single recessive gene.
To identify the Osdsm3 locus, the recessive mutant plants from the F2 population were subjected to map-based cloning. Linkage analysis revealed that the Osdsm3 locus was linked to the RM3746 marker on chromosome 1. Subsequently, newly developed SSR markers and InDel markers were employed to analyze 37 recessive mutant plants, which initially mapped the Osdsm3 locus to a 7.78 Mb interval between RM8068 and C102 on the short arm of chromosome 1 (Figure 5A). With the inclusion of 749 recessive individuals, the Osdsm3 locus was further narrowed down to a 78 Kb interval between the C272 and RM223 markers (Figure 5B). Within this region, a total of 13 open reading frames (ORFs) were identified based on the Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/). PCR amplification of the CDS and genome sequences of these 13 ORFs was performed. The sequencing results indicated a mutation of 1275G → A in the exon of ORF6 (LOC_Os01g10680), resulting in TGG → TGA, leading to premature translation termination (Figure 5C). LOC_Os01g10680 encodes a putative protein known as GIL1 (gravitropic in the light), consisting of 520 amino acids with a molecular mass of 56.48 KD (Figure S2). This protein belongs to the plant protein family DUF641, whose function is currently not well understood. Meanwhile, no mutations were found in the other 12 candidate genes between ZH8015 and dsm3. Therefore, LOC_Os01g10680 was identified as the target gene.

3.6. Analysis of Osdsm3 Expression Levels and Drought-Stress-Related Genes

To investigate the regulatory role of Osdsm3 in the drought stress mechanism, we conducted qRT-PCR analysis to measure the expression levels of two ROS-scavenging enzymes (OsPOX22.3, OsPOX8.1), two genes related to ABA synthesis (OsLCY, OsNCED4), and four genes associated with drought tolerance (OsbZIP23, OsbZIP72, OsNAC1, OsPP2X) in both ZH8015 and dsm3. The results showed that the transcript levels of OsbZIP23, OsPOX8.1, and OsNCED4 were significantly upregulated in dsm3 compared to ZH8015. In contrast, the transcript level of OsLCY was markedly downregulated in dsm3 when compared to ZH8015 (Figure 6A). Notably, the transcript levels of OsNCED4 and OsLCY were upregulated 5.1-fold and downregulated 2.6-fold, respectively. Based on these findings, we speculate that genes related to drought resistance are significantly more induced in response to drought stress in dsm3 than in the WT, and the response of dsm3 to drought stress may be regulated by ABA-dependent mechanisms.
Furthermore, the RT-PCR results indicated that the transcript level of Osdsm3 was significantly higher in dsm3 than in ZH8015 (Figure 6B). A tissue-specific expression analysis revealed that the expression of OsDSM3 was predominantly localized to young panicles, which exhibited significantly higher levels compared to other tissues. Specifically, in panicles, the expression of OsDSM3 was 3.94-fold higher than in roots and 3.82-fold higher than in leaf sheaths (Figure 6C). These findings suggest that Osdsm3 not only functions in drought tolerance but also plays a key role in grain yield formation, which is consistent with the results showing changes in grain size (Figure 1F,G).

3.7. Phylogenetic Analysis and Subcellular Localization of OsDSM3

A phylogenetic tree of Osdsm3 (LOC_Os01g10680) and other plant DUF641 family proteins was constructed using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replications via MEGA version 7 software. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that Osdsm3 shared high homology with UNE1, an intracellular transporter protein (Accession: NP_174224) found in Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 7A). According to information from TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 24 August 2023), intracellular transport proteins not only respond to gravity, red light, and far-red light but also participate in the double fertilization process of plants.
To determine the subcellular localization of OsDSM3, a 35S::DSM3-GFP fusion construct and a control 35S::GFP construct were created using the pYBA-1132-GFP vector and then transferred into rice protoplasts using the PEG 6000-mediated method. After incubating the transformed rice protoplasts for 24 h at an indoor temperature, the fluorescence signal of GFP was detected at 488 nm using a laser scanning microscope. The results showed that the 35S::DSM3-GFP fluorescence signal was exclusively distributed in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane, while the control 35S::GFP fluorescence signal was observed throughout the cell (Figure 7B). These findings indicate that OsDSM3 is a cytoplasm-localized protein.

4. Discussion

Plants often face challenges from both biotic and abiotic factors, such as drought, salt, and cold stress, leading to physiological and biochemical changes at the cellular and molecular levels [3,41,42]. In previous studies, the dsm1 mutant showed drought sensitivity during the seeding and booting stages, while the overexpression of the DSM1 gene enhanced drought resistance in rice seedlings [39]. Similarly, the dsm2 mutant exhibited drought hypersensitivity during the seedling and panicle development stages, showing higher levels of wilting and MDA content compared to wild-type plants after dehydration stress [43]. In this study, we focused on the dsm3 mutant, which displayed drought sensitivity during the tillering stage and showed a significant decrease in agronomic traits related to rice yield (Table 1). Furthermore, under drought stress, the content of MDA and H2O2 in dsm3 was higher than that in WT plants (Figure 4G,H).
The reduction in total chlorophyll content and leaf area in dsm3 might have contributed to the decrease in the net photosynthetic rate (Figure 4A,B). Drought stress disrupted the ROS homeostasis in plant cells, resulting in ROS accumulation and the breakdown of membrane lipids [44], which could cause cell death in dsm3, as confirmed via Evans blue staining (Figure 2A). The reduced stomatal conductance of dms3 weakened its ability to absorb CO2 from the environment, leading to a decrease in intercellular CO2 concentration and insufficient fixation of CO2 during the photosynthetic dark reaction phase. Consequently, dry matter accumulation was reduced, consistent with the change in the thousand-grain weight (Table 1). These results indicate that dms3 is a drought-sensitive mutant and exhibits unique responses under drought stress. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of its drought sensitivity may provide valuable insights into developing strategies for enhancing drought resistance in rice and other crops.
Peroxidases are found universally in vascular plants and play a crucial role in defending against abiotic stress, such as drought, salt, and heat, by scavenging ROS [45]. In the case of the peroxidase gene OsPOX8.1, its expression level was higher in dsm3 compared to ZH8015, but, surprisingly, the POD activity was significantly reduced in dsm3 (Figure 6A). This led us to conclude that the POD expression might be activated due to the accumulation of peroxides. Further investigations, including peroxidase activity assays, superoxide dismutase tests, and DAB staining, revealed that dsm3 suffered damage from ROS accumulation, which aligned with Jing’s research [39].
Earlier studies have suggested that stress-related genes respond to drought stress through ABA-dependent or ABA-independent pathways [46,47]. In our study, we performed a comparative analysis of drought-stress-related genes in dsm3 and ZH8015 (Figure 6A). Notably, the gene OsNCED4, responsible for catalyzing the rate-limiting step of ABA biosynthesis, showed a significant increase in relative transcript levels under drought stress [26]. Simultaneously, the upstream gene OsLCY, responsible for ABA biosynthesis through carotene conversion, exhibited significant downregulation under drought stress [27]. The varying expression levels of OsNCED4 and OsLCY support their role in ABA biosynthesis, as previously described. Consequently, we speculated that the dsm3 response to drought stress might be regulated through the ABA-dependent pathway. Additionally, we observed that Osdsm3 exhibited the highest relative transcript abundance in young panicles, while the grain-weight of dsm3 reduced significantly (Figure 6C, Table 1). This indicates that Osdsm3 might be a multifunctional gene, playing a role in both rice yields and responses to drought.
The candidate interval comprised 13 ORFs, of which ORFs 1 to 5 and 11 to 13 encoded proteins of unknown functions, as described in RGAP (Table S1). Additionally, ORF7 encoded a δ-composite subunit involved in DNA polymorphism, consisting of a POLD1/p123 catalytic unit and three regulatory units—POLD2/p50, POLD3/p66, and POLD4/p12. This subunit played a crucial role in DNA repair mechanisms [48]. ORF8 encoded an immune protein with a domain containing collagen fiber and cyclic carbohydrates, facilitating the recognition of specific microbial surface carbohydrates and participating in immune responses to pathogen infections [49]. ORF9 encoded a receptor-like protein kinase, responsible for sensing and transducing stress signals and regulating downstream gene expression through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation to combat biotic and abiotic stresses [50]. Notably, all of these genes exhibited identical sequences between ZH8015 and dsm3.
Moving on to ORF6, it encoded a GIL1 protein, which in Arabidopsis thaliana was induced simultaneously by light and gravity. In experiments with the loss-of-function gil1 mutant exposed to red light and far-red light in the presence of gravity, its hypocotyl growth occurred in the anti-gravity direction. However, there were no phenotype changes when it was solely induced by gravity or light [51]. Nonetheless, further investigation is needed to determine whether ORF6 influences the growth direction of rice hypocotyls. No insertions, deletions, transitions, or transversions were found in the other ORFs, except for a single base mutation in the exon of ORF6 (Osdsm3), leading to premature translation termination. Based on these findings, ORF6 was identified as the candidate gene. The identified mutation site, Osdsm3, which results in the formation of a premature stop codon, offers a compelling opportunity for gene editing to create relatively weaker mutant variants. This approach holds the potential to establish a harmonious balance between crop yields and drought resistance, enabling the identification of suitable loci that confer both improved drought tolerance and maintained productivity. By exploring and harnessing these beneficial mutation sites, novel resources for water-efficient and drought-resistant rice varieties can be developed, contributing significantly to the advancement of sustainable agriculture practices. However, the gene function requires verification through transgenic complementary experiments.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we conducted a screening and characterization of a drought-sensitive mutant, named dsm3, from the progenies of indica rice variety Zhonghui 8015 treated with EMS. Through phenotypic analysis and drought stress evaluation, we established that dsm3 exhibited sensitivity to drought stress. The underlying cause of the dsm3 phenotype was traced back to the Osdsm3 gene, which was located within a 78 kb interval between markers C272 and RM223 on the short arm of chromosome 1. Initial insights into the function of Osdsm3 were gained through phylogenetic analysis and subcellular localization studies. Subsequent map-based cloning of Osdsm3 will further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind drought resistance in rice and pave the way for developing new drought-resistant rice cultivars.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy13092241/s1, Figure S1: The phenotype of wild type ZH8015 and dsm3 under normal growth conditions. scale bar = 10 cm; Figure S2: Multiple sequence alignment of the amino acid sequence encoded by GIL1 gene (LOC_Os01g106080.1) of rice and GIL proteins in other species; Table S1: Candidate genes in target region; Table S2: Primers used for gene mapping, subcellular localization, and RT-qPCR.

Author Contributions

Data curation, C.D.; funding acquisition, S.C. and L.C.; investigation, B.W., H.W., P.X. and Y.C.; methodology, C.D.; resources, Y.Z.; supervision, Y.Z. and L.S.; writing—original draft, C.D.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., L.S. and D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31961143016; Fundamental Research Funds of Central Public Welfare Research Institutions, grant number CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202102; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Innovation Project, grant number ASTIP-2013-CNRRI; China Agriculture Research System, grant Number CARS-01-03; and Zhejiang Provincial Key Special Projects, grant number 2021C02063-1.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Upadhyaya, H.; Panda, S.K. Drought stress responses and its management in rice. In Advances in Rice Research for Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, X.; Wang, B.; Chen, L.; Li, P.; Cao, C. The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. dos Santos, T.B.; Ribas, A.F.; de Souza, S.G.H.; Budzinski, I.G.F.; Domingues, D.S. Physiological Responses to Drought, Salinity, and Heat Stress in Plants: A Review. Stresses 2022, 2, 113–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Salsinha, Y.C.F.; Maryani; Indradewa, D.; Purwestri, Y.A.; Rachmawati, D. Leaf physiological and anatomical characters contribute to drought tolerance of Nusa Tenggara Timur local rice cultivars. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 24, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, W.; Cui, K.; Xu, A.; Nie, L.; Huang, J.; Peng, S. Drought stress condition increases root to shoot ratio via alteration of carbohydrate partitioning and enzymatic activity in rice seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hazman, M.; Brown, K.M. Progressive drought alters architectural and anatomical traits of rice roots. Rice 2018, 11, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ranjan, A.; Sinha, R.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A.; Singh, A.K. Shaping the root system architecture in plants for adaptation to drought stress. Physiol. Plant 2022, 174, e13651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Redillas, M.C.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, Y.S.; Jeong, J.S.; Jung, H.; Bang, S.W.; Hahn, T.-R.; Kim, J.-K. Accumulation of trehalose increases soluble sugar contents in rice plants conferring tolerance to drought and salt stress. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2012, 6, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Yu, F.; Hu, B.; Jia, Y.; Sha, H.; Zhao, H. Differential activity of the antioxidant defence system and alterations in the accumulation of osmolyte and reactive oxygen species under drought stress and recovery in rice (Oryza sativa L.) tillering. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sales, C.R.; Ribeiro, R.V.; Silveira, J.A.; Machado, E.C.; Martins, M.O.; Lagoa, A.M. Superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase improve the recovery of photosynthesis in sugarcane plants subjected to water deficit and low substrate temperature. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oladosu, Y.; Rafii, M.Y.; Samuel, C.; Fatai, A.; Magaji, U.; Kareem, I.; Kamarudin, Z.S.; Muhammad, I.; Kolapo, K. Drought Resistance in Rice from Conventional to Molecular Breeding: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Panda, D.; Mishra, S.S.; Behera, P.K. Drought tolerance in rice: Focus on recent mechanisms and approaches. Rice Sci. 2021, 28, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiang, Y.; Tang, N.; Du, H.; Ye, H.; Xiong, L. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1938–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L.; Kusaba, M.; Tanaka, A.; Sakamoto, W. Protection of Chloroplast Membranes by VIPP1 Rescues Aberrant Seedling Development in Arabidopsis nyc1 Mutant. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aroca, R. Plant responses to drought stress. In From Morphological to Molecular Features; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, S.; Hu, W.; Deng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Luo, Q.; Jin, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S. A rice calcium-dependent protein kinase OsCPK9 positively regulates drought stress tolerance and spikelet fertility. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahmad, I.; Devonshire, J.; Mohamed, R.; Schultze, M.; Maathuis, F.J. Overexpression of the potassium channel TPKb in small vacuoles confers osmotic and drought tolerance to rice. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1040–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.; Zheng, L.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Shou, H. Overexpression of OsVP1 and OsNHX1 increases tolerance to drought and salinity in rice. J. Plant Biol. 2010, 53, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, D.; Dong, X.; Tian, L.; Qu, L.Q. A β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase is involved in rice leaf cuticular wax synthesis and requires a CER2-LIKE protein as a cofactor. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 944–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Du, H.; Liu, L.; You, L.; Yang, M.; He, Y.; Li, X.; Xiong, L. Characterization of an inositol 1, 3, 4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase gene that is essential for drought and salt stress responses in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77, 547–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, J.; Zheng, X.; Zheng, S.; Sun, X.; Qiu, Q.; Lu, T. Gene knockout study reveals that cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 2 (OsAPX2) plays a critical role in growth and reproduction in rice under drought, salt and cold stresses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yu, J.; Lai, Y.; Wu, X.; Wu, G.; Guo, C. Overexpression of OsEm1 encoding a group I LEA protein confers enhanced drought tolerance in rice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 478, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sharma, E.; Bhatnagar, A.; Bhaskar, A.; Majee, S.M.; Kieffer, M.; Kepinski, S.; Khurana, P.; Khurana, J.P. Stress-induced F-Box protein-coding gene OsFBX257 modulates drought stress adaptations and ABA responses in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2023, 46, 1207–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, G.; Gao, C.; Zheng, X.; Han, B. Identification of OsbZIP72 as a positive regulator of ABA response and drought tolerance in rice. Planta 2009, 229, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vanitha, P.A.; Vijayaraghavareddy, P.; Uttarkar, A.; Dawane, A.; Sujitha, D.; Ashwin, V.; Babitha, K.C.; Niranjan, V.; Sheshshayee, M.S.; Anuradha, C.V.; et al. Novel small molecules targeting bZIP23 TF improve stomatal conductance and photosynthesis under mild drought stress by regulating ABA. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 6058–6077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fang, J.; Chai, C.; Qian, Q.; Li, C.; Tang, J.; Sun, L.; Huang, Z.; Guo, X.; Sun, C.; Liu, M.; et al. Mutations of genes in synthesis of the carotenoid precursors of ABA lead to pre-harvest sprouting and photo-oxidation in rice. Plant J. 2008, 54, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hwang, S.G.; Lee, C.Y.; Tseng, C.S. Heterologous expression of rice 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 4 (OsNCED4) in Arabidopsis confers sugar oversensitivity and drought tolerance. Bot. Stud. 2018, 59, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hu, H.; Dai, M.; Yao, J.; Xiao, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, L. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12987–12992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Schweighofer, A.; Hirt, H.; Meskiene, I. Plant PP2C phosphatases: Emerging functions in stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhatnagar, N.; Min, M.K.; Choi, E.H.; Kim, N.; Moon, S.J.; Yoon, I.; Kwon, T.; Jung, K.H.; Kim, B.G. The protein phosphatase 2C clade A protein OsPP2C51 positively regulates seed germination by directly inactivating OsbZIP10. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 93, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, Q.; Liu, K.; Niu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wan, Y.; Yang, F.; Li, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, R. Genome-wide Identification of PP2C Genes and Their Expression Profiling in Response to Drought and Cold Stresses in Medicago truncatula. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zong, W.; Tang, N.; Yang, J.; Peng, L.; Ma, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, G.; Xiong, L. Feedback Regulation of ABA Signaling and Biosynthesis by a bZIP Transcription Factor Targets Drought-Resistance-Related Genes. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2810–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, Z.; Ge, B.; Cao, S.; Gan, Y.; Jiang, Z. K You 267, a New Hybrid Rice Combination with Cold Tolerance. Hybrid Rice 2004, 19, 74–75. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Peng, Z.; Sprague, S.A.; Wang, W.; Park, J.; Akhunov, E.; Jagadish, K.S.V.; Nakata, P.A.; Cheng, N.; et al. Silencing of OsGRXS17 in rice improves drought stress tolerance by modulating ROS accumulation and stomatal closure. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, D.; Liu, P.; Yu, J.; Wang, L.; Dossa, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Wei, X.; Zhang, X. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY gene family in the sesame genome and identification of the WRKY genes involved in responses to abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Meng, H.; Wen, H.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, J. Maize ABP9 enhances tolerance to multiple stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis by modulating ABA signaling and cellular levels of reactive oxygen species. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 75, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kim, M.; Ahn, J.W.; Jin, U.H.; Choi, D.; Paek, K.H.; Pai, H.S. Activation of the programmed cell death pathway by inhibition of proteasome function in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 19406–19415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Allen, G.C.; Flores-Vergara, M.A.; Krasynanski, S.; Kumar, S.; Thompson, W.F. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2320–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ning, J.; Li, X.; Hicks, L.M.; Xiong, L. A Raf-like MAPKKK gene DSM1 mediates drought resistance through reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 876–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X. Effects of Drought Stress at Booting Stage on Carbon Metabolism and Yield Formation of Japonica Rice in Cold Region; Northeast Agricultural University: Harbin, China, 2020. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chaudhry, S.; Sidhu, G.P.S. Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: A comprehensive review. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zandalinas, S.I.; Balfagón, D.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Mittler, R. Plant responses to climate change: Metabolic changes under combined abiotic stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 3339–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Du, H.; Wang, N.; Cui, F.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Xiong, L. Characterization of the beta-carotene hydroxylase gene DSM2 conferring drought and oxidative stress resistance by increasing xanthophylls and abscisic acid synthesis in rice. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 1304–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qi, J.; Song, C.P.; Wang, B.; Zhou, J.; Kangasjarvi, J.; Zhu, J.K.; Gong, Z. Reactive oxygen species signaling and stomatal movement in plant responses to drought stress and pathogen attack. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 805–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kalsoom, U.; Bhatti, H.N.; Asgher, M. Characterization of Plant Peroxidases and Their Potential for Degradation of Dyes: A Review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 1529–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yoshida, T.; Mogami, J.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 21, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Takahashi, F.; Kuromori, T.; Sato, H.; Shinozaki, K. Regulatory Gene Networks in Drought Stress Responses and Resistance in Plants. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1081, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hirota, K.; Yoshikiyo, K.; Guilbaud, G.; Tsurimoto, T.; Murai, J.; Tsuda, M.; Phillips, L.G.; Narita, T.; Nishihara, K.; Kobayashi, K.; et al. The POLD3 subunit of DNA polymerase delta can promote translesion synthesis independently of DNA polymerase zeta. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 1671–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Palaniyar, N.; Nadesalingam, J.; Clark, H.; Shih, M.J.; Dodds, A.W.; Reid, K.B. Nucleic acid is a novel ligand for innate, immune pattern recognition collectins surfactant proteins A and D and mannose-binding lectin. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 32728–32736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhu, W.; Ma, T.; Zhang, M.; Sha, W. Research progress of receptor-like protein kinases in plants. Genom. Appl. Biol. 2018, 37, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Allen, T.; Ingles, P.J.; Praekelt, U.; Smith, H.; Whitelam, G.C. Phytochrome-mediated agravitropism in Arabidopsis hypocotyls requires GIL1 and confers a fitness advantage. Plant J. 2006, 46, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 13 02241 g001
Figure 1. Phenotype of dsm3 mutant under drought stress. (A,B): Plant architecture and leaf tip phenotype of ZH8015 and dsm3 at sowing 60 days under drought stress, respectively. (C,D): The plant height of dsm3 significantly decreased at the heading and maturation stage. (E–G): Comparison of panicle length, grain width and length between ZH8015 and dsm3 at the maturation stage, respectively. (A,C,D) scale bar = 10 cm. (B,E) scale bar = 2 cm. (F,G) scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 1. Phenotype of dsm3 mutant under drought stress. (A,B): Plant architecture and leaf tip phenotype of ZH8015 and dsm3 at sowing 60 days under drought stress, respectively. (C,D): The plant height of dsm3 significantly decreased at the heading and maturation stage. (E–G): Comparison of panicle length, grain width and length between ZH8015 and dsm3 at the maturation stage, respectively. (A,C,D) scale bar = 10 cm. (B,E) scale bar = 2 cm. (F,G) scale bar = 1 cm.
Agronomy 13 02241 g001
Agronomy 13 02241 g002aAgronomy 13 02241 g002b
Figure 2. Response to drought treatment of ZH8015 and dsm3 at the tillering stage. (A): The leaf tip phenotype comparison of ZH8015 and dsm3 after stress treatment of 2d, 4d, and 6d. (B,C): The maximum root length of ZH8015 and dsm3 exhibited a variation trend as the stress treatment time was prolonged. (D): The chart of root–shoot ratio variation tendency between ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. (E): Soil relative moisture of ZH8015 and dsm3 decreased gradually with the extension of stress treatment time. (F–I): Statistical analysis of total protein content (F), POD activity (G), MDA content (H), and SOD activity (I) in ZH8015 and dsm3 after drought stress. (A) scale bar = 10 cm. (B) scale bar = 2 cm (n = 3). Data (C–E) were presented as means ± SD, (n = 3). * p < 0.05, Student’s t-test.
Figure 2. Response to drought treatment of ZH8015 and dsm3 at the tillering stage. (A): The leaf tip phenotype comparison of ZH8015 and dsm3 after stress treatment of 2d, 4d, and 6d. (B,C): The maximum root length of ZH8015 and dsm3 exhibited a variation trend as the stress treatment time was prolonged. (D): The chart of root–shoot ratio variation tendency between ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. (E): Soil relative moisture of ZH8015 and dsm3 decreased gradually with the extension of stress treatment time. (F–I): Statistical analysis of total protein content (F), POD activity (G), MDA content (H), and SOD activity (I) in ZH8015 and dsm3 after drought stress. (A) scale bar = 10 cm. (B) scale bar = 2 cm (n = 3). Data (C–E) were presented as means ± SD, (n = 3). * p < 0.05, Student’s t-test.
Agronomy 13 02241 g002aAgronomy 13 02241 g002b
Agronomy 13 02241 g003
Figure 3. Histochemical staining of ZH8015 and dsm3 to assay the presence of H2O2, dead cells, and cell size. (A): Leaf Evans blue staining of ZH8015 and dsm3 to assay the presence of dead cells. (B): Leaf DAB staining of ZH8015 and dsm3 to monitor the presence of H2O2. (C): NerveRed staining assay carried out to measure the cell size in root apical meristem between ZH8015 and dsm3. (A,B) scale bar = 1 cm. (C) scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 3. Histochemical staining of ZH8015 and dsm3 to assay the presence of H2O2, dead cells, and cell size. (A): Leaf Evans blue staining of ZH8015 and dsm3 to assay the presence of dead cells. (B): Leaf DAB staining of ZH8015 and dsm3 to monitor the presence of H2O2. (C): NerveRed staining assay carried out to measure the cell size in root apical meristem between ZH8015 and dsm3. (A,B) scale bar = 1 cm. (C) scale bar = 20 μm.
Agronomy 13 02241 g003
Agronomy 13 02241 g004
Figure 4. Measurement of drought-related physiological traits in ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. (A): The levels of Chla, Chlb, and Car measured in ZH8015 and dsm3 after drought stress. (B−D): Statistical analysis of the Pn, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO2 concentration in ZH8015 and dsm3 at the tillering stage after drought stress. (E−K): Statistical analysis of total protein content (E), proline content (F), MDA content (G), H2O2 content (H), Soluble sugar content (I), SOD activity (J), and POD activity (K) in ZH8015 and dsm3 at the tillering stage after drought stress. (Mean ± SD, n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. Measurement of drought-related physiological traits in ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. (A): The levels of Chla, Chlb, and Car measured in ZH8015 and dsm3 after drought stress. (B−D): Statistical analysis of the Pn, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO2 concentration in ZH8015 and dsm3 at the tillering stage after drought stress. (E−K): Statistical analysis of total protein content (E), proline content (F), MDA content (G), H2O2 content (H), Soluble sugar content (I), SOD activity (J), and POD activity (K) in ZH8015 and dsm3 at the tillering stage after drought stress. (Mean ± SD, n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test.
Agronomy 13 02241 g004
Agronomy 13 02241 g005
Figure 5. Fine mapping of Osdsm3. (A): Primary mapping of Osdsm3 locus. The character above the chromosome represents the SSR and IeDel markers. And the number on the right side of the chromosome indicates the recessive mutant. The same applies below. (B): Fine mapping of Osdsm3 locus. Numbers under the chromosome indicate the no. of recombinants. The 13 ORFs in the 78 Kb interval are represented by the blue rectangle. (C): The Osdsm3 gene structure. The Osdsm3 gene containing one exon and one intron is indicated using the red rectangle and black line, respectively. A mutation from G to A in the exon caused premature translation termination. * indicates that the corresponding TGA stop codon does not code for any amino acid.
Figure 5. Fine mapping of Osdsm3. (A): Primary mapping of Osdsm3 locus. The character above the chromosome represents the SSR and IeDel markers. And the number on the right side of the chromosome indicates the recessive mutant. The same applies below. (B): Fine mapping of Osdsm3 locus. Numbers under the chromosome indicate the no. of recombinants. The 13 ORFs in the 78 Kb interval are represented by the blue rectangle. (C): The Osdsm3 gene structure. The Osdsm3 gene containing one exon and one intron is indicated using the red rectangle and black line, respectively. A mutation from G to A in the exon caused premature translation termination. * indicates that the corresponding TGA stop codon does not code for any amino acid.
Agronomy 13 02241 g005
Agronomy 13 02241 g006
Figure 6. Expression level and pattern analysis of Osdsm3 and dehydration stress-related genes in ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. (A): The relative expression levels of drought-stress-associated genes were measured using qRT-PCR in ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. The transcript level is expressed relative to a UBQ reference gene. (B): Relative expression level of Osdsm3 in ZH8015 and dsm3. The relative expression level of Osdsm3 in dsm3 was normalized to that of ZH8015. (C): The tissue-specific expression of Osdsm3 was analysed in ZH8015. Data (A–C) are presented as means ± SD, (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test.
Figure 6. Expression level and pattern analysis of Osdsm3 and dehydration stress-related genes in ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. (A): The relative expression levels of drought-stress-associated genes were measured using qRT-PCR in ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress. The transcript level is expressed relative to a UBQ reference gene. (B): Relative expression level of Osdsm3 in ZH8015 and dsm3. The relative expression level of Osdsm3 in dsm3 was normalized to that of ZH8015. (C): The tissue-specific expression of Osdsm3 was analysed in ZH8015. Data (A–C) are presented as means ± SD, (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test.
Agronomy 13 02241 g006
Agronomy 13 02241 g007
Figure 7. Phylogenetic analysis and subcellular localization of OsDSM3. (A): The Phylogenetic relationship of DUF641 protein family among indica rice ZH8015, A. thaliana and Z. mays, determined using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA version 7 software. Genebank accession number for amino acid sequences AT1G29300 (UNE1), AT3G60680, AT2G45260, AT5G58960, and ZEAMMB73_Zm00001d032503. (B): Subcellular localization of the Osdsm3 protein in rice protoplasts. A fusion vector 35S::DSM3-GFP and a control 35S::GFP were transferred into rice protoplasts. The green fluorescence signal was detected at an excitation wavelength 488 nm using a laser scanning microscope. Scale bars = 2 μm.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic analysis and subcellular localization of OsDSM3. (A): The Phylogenetic relationship of DUF641 protein family among indica rice ZH8015, A. thaliana and Z. mays, determined using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA version 7 software. Genebank accession number for amino acid sequences AT1G29300 (UNE1), AT3G60680, AT2G45260, AT5G58960, and ZEAMMB73_Zm00001d032503. (B): Subcellular localization of the Osdsm3 protein in rice protoplasts. A fusion vector 35S::DSM3-GFP and a control 35S::GFP were transferred into rice protoplasts. The green fluorescence signal was detected at an excitation wavelength 488 nm using a laser scanning microscope. Scale bars = 2 μm.
Agronomy 13 02241 g007
Table 1. Comparison with agronomic traits between ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress.
Table 1. Comparison with agronomic traits between ZH8015 and dsm3 under drought stress.
TraitZH8015dsm3
Plant height (cm)101.90 ± 2.7071.25 ± 3.16 **
No. of effective tillerings6.30 ± 1.806.70 ± 1.40
Grain length (cm)1.01 ± 0.100.97 ± 0.13 *
Grain width (cm)0.33 ± 0.040.29 ± 0.05 *
Grain length–width ratio0.31 ± 0.050.33 ± 0.07 **
Thousand-grain weight (g)38.33 ± 0.9926.91 ± 1.53 **
Panicle length (cm)24.40 ± 1.4018.80 ± 1.14 **
Flag leaf length (cm)30.38 ± 4.1122.33 ± 3.11 **
Flag leaf width (cm)1.58 ± 0.091.26 ± 0.13 *
Second upper leaf length (cm)41.66 ± 4.6433.87 ± 4.00 *
Second upper leaf width (cm)1.48 ± 0.121.25 ± 0.07 **
Third upper leaf length (cm)45.68 ± 4.6041.33 ± 3.59 *
Third upper leaf width (cm)1.52 ± 0.121.25 ± 0.08 **
* p < 0.05 compared with ZH8015, ** p < 0.01 compared with ZH8015.
Table 2. Genetic analysis of dsm3 in F2 population.
Table 2. Genetic analysis of dsm3 in F2 population.
F2 Population F1 GenerationNo. of Normal PlantsNo. of Mutant PlantsTheoretic RatioChi-Square Value
dsm3 × 02428Normal25918093:12.64
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, H.; Xue, P.; Cao, Y.; Sun, L.; Cheng, S.; Cao, L.; Chen, D. Identification and Fine Mapping of Osdsm3, a Drought-Sensitive Gene in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agronomy 2023, 13, 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092241

AMA Style

Deng C, Zhang Y, Wang B, Wang H, Xue P, Cao Y, Sun L, Cheng S, Cao L, Chen D. Identification and Fine Mapping of Osdsm3, a Drought-Sensitive Gene in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agronomy. 2023; 13(9):2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Chenwei, Yingxin Zhang, Beifang Wang, Hong Wang, Pao Xue, Yongrun Cao, Lianping Sun, Shihua Cheng, Liyong Cao, and Daibo Chen. 2023. "Identification and Fine Mapping of Osdsm3, a Drought-Sensitive Gene in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)" Agronomy 13, no. 9: 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop