Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Potentials of Different Genotypes of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Cultivated in Bulgaria, Southern Europe
Next Article in Special Issue
Germination Pattern and Seed Longevity of Echinochloa colona (L.) Link in Eastern Australia
Previous Article in Journal
Asp376Glu Mutation and Enhanced Metabolism Controlling the Resistance to ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides in Ixophorus unisetus (J. Presl) Schltdl. from the Bajio, Mexico
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/agronomy13071683
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Knowledge of Cover Crop Seed Traits and Treatments to Enhance Weed Suppression: A Narrative Review

by
Iraj Nosratti
1,*,
Nicholas E. Korres
2 and
Stéphane Cordeau
3
1
Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah 6714414971, Iran
2
Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture, University of Ioannina, Kostakii, 47100 Arta, Greece
3
Agroécologie, INRAE, Institut Agro, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000 Dijon, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(7), 1683; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071683
Submission received: 17 May 2023 / Revised: 19 June 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 22 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Weed Management in the Agroecosystem)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cover crops, as either a living plant or mulch, can suppress weeds by reducing weed germination, emergence and growth, either through direct competition for resources, allelopathy, or by providing a physical barrier to emergence. Farmers implementing conservation agriculture, organic farming, or agroecological principles are increasingly adopting cover crops as part of their farming strategy. However, cover crop adoption remains limited by poor and/or unstable establishment in dry conditions, the weediness of cover crop volunteers as subsequent cash crops, and seed costs. This study is the first to review the scientific literature on seed traits of cover crops to identify the key biotic and abiotic factors influencing germination and early establishment (density, biomass, cover). Knowledge about seed traits would be helpful in choosing suitable cover crop species and/or mixtures adapted to specific environments. Such information is crucial to improve cover crops’ establishment and growth and the provision of ecosystem services, while allowing farmers to save seeds and therefore money. We discuss how to improve cover crop establishment by seed priming and coating, and appropriate seed sowing patterns and depth. Here, three cover crop families, namely, Poaceae, Brassicaceae, and Fabaceae, were examined in terms of seed traits and response to environmental conditions. The review showed that seed traits related to germination are crucial as they affect the germination timing and establishment of the cover crop, and consequently soil coverage uniformity, factors that directly relate to their suppressive effect on weeds. Poaceae and Brassicaceae exhibit a higher germination percentage than Fabaceae under water deficit conditions. The seed dormancy of some Fabaceae species/cultivars limits their agricultural use as cover crops because the domestication of some wild ecotypes is not complete. Understanding the genetic and environmental regulation of seed dormancy is necessary. The appropriate selection of cover crop cultivars is crucial to improve cover crop establishment and provide multiple ecosystem services, including weed suppression, particularly in a climate change context.

1. Introduction

Weeds are a major constraint to crop production and should be managed through direct or indirect methods [1] to secure crop productivity and the high quality of the harvest [2]. Chemical weed control remains the most widely used weed control method due to its high efficacy/cost ratio. However, overreliance on herbicides in combination with monoculture has led to the evolution of weed herbicide resistance [3] and a loss of weed diversity [4], leading to the emergence of a few dominant weed species responsible for high yield losses [5]. In particular, the development of herbicide resistance holds a critical role in hindering further herbicide usage for weed control [6]. The intensive use of herbicide is now questioned for its effects on the environment and human health [7]. The intensive use of primary tillage and false seedbed during the fallow period, coupled with in-crop mechanical weeding, are questioned for their impact on soil health, economic profitability, and environmental impacts [8]. Therefore, ecological-based and nature-based options for weed management are required and appear to be promising for various type of farming systems [9].
Annual cover crops, living mulches, and companion crops can be used to improve weed management [10,11] and enhance soil health [12,13,14]. Cover crops are plant species cultivated between two main cash crops which can provide multiple ecosystem services, including suppressing weeds through competition [15,16,17], allelopathy [18], and a physical barrier [19,20], or indirectly by providing a habitat for seed predators [21,22,23]. Cover crop species with high biomass accumulation, early season emergence, and rapid growth are more efficient at outcompeting weeds through resource competition. Indeed, even if field demonstrations of their allelopathic properties remain scare [18], cover crops can exudate allelopathic substances, proportionally to their biomass production, that suppress weeds further [17]. However, identifying the mechanisms by which cover crops exert their negative effects on weeds in the field remains challenging [24], but crucial to improve their efficacy. Cover crops have proven to be an effective ecological-based weed management tool in various agricultural systems [25,26,27,28]. Cover cropping is one of the main pillars of weed management in no-till and conservation agricultural systems [29]. However, since tillage and herbicide represent major drivers on weed communities [30], most studies have failed to highlight a carrying over effect of cover crops in tillage-based systems [31]. Furthermore, the usage of cover should be optimized in tillage-based systems as a part of integrated weed management strategies used in order to reduce the reliance on herbicide use [32].
In order to increase the use of cover crops, knowledge is required to identify the factors hampering farmers’ adoption. It is well documented that the level of weed control provided by cover crops greatly depends on rapid growth and soil coverage, which in turn are influenced by the relative weed/cover crop growth at early phenological stages, such as seed germination and seedling emergence [33]. This is of particular importance, especially when cover crops are exposed to stressful abiotic conditions caused by climate change. They must establish a high biomass and coverage faster than weeds through a faster growth at an earlier stage. In addition, climate change might interfere with the allelopathic potential of cover crops because the persistence of allelochemicals may change with soil humidity and temperature, and may not be as effective to inhibit weed seed germination [34,35].
Here, we review the scientific literature and critically address the factors that affect the germination of cover crops in response to environmental and agronomic factors, seed traits of main cover crop species, and methods to increase cover crop seed germination. Such knowledge is required to improve the establishment and management of cover crops and will eventually enhance their integration into cropping systems.

2. Factors Affecting Cover Crops’ Seed Germination

There are several agronomic and environmental factors that impact the seed germination of cover crops. Knowing the germination responses of cover crop seeds to different conditions would be beneficial for the effective utilization of cover crops against weeds while providing desirable agroecosystem functions.

2.1. Abiotic Factors

Temperature and Soil Moisture

Temperature and soil water are two important abiotic factors impacting germination and the early growth of seedlings [36], among others such as soil pH, active limestone, and texture [37]. The lowest water potential at which a seed can germinate, known as base water potential. is partially correlated with the species indicator values [38]. Such data on base water potential could be helpful to predict seed germination under various soil moisture levels. However, cardinal temperatures are the best criteria to determine the optimum habitant for a specific cover crop. Seed traits, including age, the nutrient status of the seeds, and the quality of the seeds can affect their responses to temperature and soil water [39].
Accounting for temperature and water requirements for the seed germination of cover crop seeds can help in designing cover crop mixtures with similar sowing periods and responses to environmental conditions, hence reducing the risk of heterogeneous seed germination. Furthermore, both simulating the emergence of cover crops under various environmental conditions and predicting the exact date of cover crop emergence are feasible by having such data [40,41].
Tribouillois, et al. [42] determined the germination response of a variety of cover crop species to a wide range of temperature and water potentials, showing that suitable temperature was highest for the cover crop from Brassicaceae, followed by Poaceae, Asteraceae, and Fabaceae. Most of the tested species germinated well under the warm conditions of summer, while some Fabaceae species showed a sensitivity to high temperature. Generally, cover crop species studied by Tribouillois, Dürr, Demilly, Wagner and Justes [42] showed two contrasting types of final germination percentage (Figure 1). First, the germination of all Fabaceae species, all C3 Poaceae, some Brassicaceae (Brassica napus L., Sinapis alba L. and Eruca sativa Mill.), Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth. and Helianthus annuus L. was steady in the temperature range 24–35 °C and then decreased near 40 °C. Secondly, Brassicaceae, the two C4 Poaceae, Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass. and Fagopyrum esculentum Moench germination percentages were negligible at the extreme ends of the tested temperature range (Figure 1).
Tribouillois, Dürr, Demilly, Wagner and Justes [42] reported that by decreasing the water potential, the germination of some cover crop species such as Lupinus angustifllius L., Vicia faba L., Trigonella foenum-graecum L., and Pisum sativum L. decreased, but the slope of reduction varied greatly among species (Figure 1). The lowest base water potential was recorded for species of Poaceae (−1.6 MPa) (especially C3 species), followed by Brassicaceae (−1.4 MPa ) and Fabaceae (−0.6 MPa) (Figure 1). In comparison to species from Poaceae and Brassicaceae, the seed germination of Poaceae was sensitive to water stress (Figure 1). Most Fabaceae species were sensitive to low water availability, which indicates that they are better suited to rainy climates. Regardless of botanical family, the tested cover crop species were grouped based on favorable temperature and water potential, which was very informative for choosing a cover crop for a given climate condition and growing season. [42] argued that the value of the base water potential of large-seeded plants is higher than that of small-seeded plants, as they require more water for consumption.

2.2. Seed Dormancy

It is well established that due to the poor termination of cover crop growth and seed dormancy characteristics, cover crops have a great potential for becoming weedy in subsequent crops. Seed dormancy is the failure of an intact viable seed to complete germination under favorable conditions [43]. Seed dormancy is a complex trait, in that both its development and breaking is regulated by a combination of environmental and genetic factors [43,44,45].
The domestication and breeding of major crop species has resulted in the removal of most dormancy mechanisms in their seeds inherited from their wild ancestors [46]. However, cover crop seeds have several dormancy mechanisms as they have not undergone vigorous domestications processes (genetic and morphological changes within the plant that makes it suitable for cultivation) [43,46,47]. Seed dormancy can limit the agricultural use of many cover crop species in different ways, especially for the Fabaceae family. Hence, information on the genetic and environmental factors affecting seed dormancy is required to prevent them becoming weedy in subsequent crops.
Previous studies have demonstrated that the combined effects of cover crop genotype and climate conditions during seed development on the maternal plants and then storing condition during postharvest determine the mechanism and level of seed dormancy [47,48,49]. It is well established that climate conditions surrounding the parental plants have the highest contribution to the germination ability of their resultant seeds [50]. In addition, seed rain during the growing season or after incomplete termination can contribute to the weediness of cover crops in farmlands [51,52].
Several seed-dormancy-breaking methods have been suggested to alleviate and overcome dormancy, which vary depending on the dormancy type (Table 1). Despite the interest in releasing cover crop seeds from their dormancy and enhancing their germination rate, these practices would increase seed costs [53].

3. Seed Traits of Main Cover Crop Species

Worldwide, cover crop species cultivated in different agricultural ecosystem are commonly from the genera Vicia sp., Trifolium sp., Secale sp., Lolium sp., Hordeum sp., Sorghum sp., Raphanus sp., and Sinapis sp. The three main botanical families are Poaceae, Fabaceae, and Brassicaceae [34], and their seed germination requirements vary greatly among botanical families [69]. The following sections provide useful information, particularly from a seed germination perspective, to improve the selection of crop species in specific production situations.

3.1. Fabaceae

Cover crops of the Fabaceae botanical family are popular because of their ability to convert atmospheric nitrogen into plant-available forms. Rapid establishment, the high capability of biomass accumulation, improving soil organic matter, enhancing soil structure, reducing soil erosion risk, and suppressing weeds are some properties of legume cover crops [70,71,72].
Despite several agronomic benefits and desirable agroecosystem functions of cropping systems that incorporate Fabaceae plants as cover crops, seed dormancy limits their use. Vicia sp. and Trifolium sp. are the main cover crop species (Table 1). From a weed management point of view, these cover crop species are noxious and there are limited options for their control in main crops [73]. Seeds of legumes demonstrate both physiological and physical seed dormancy, and can therefore persist in the soil seed bank [54].

3.1.1. Vicia sp.

Vicia villosa Roth is considered to be the only species from the Vicia genus that can survive moderate to harsh winter conditions [74] Seeds produced by V. villosa, similar to other species of this genus, are dimorphic, comprising of both soft and hard seed coats. Hard seeds of V. villosa persist for more than two years and have a higher rate of dormancy-breaking during the first 6 months. Furthermore, it is estimated that >45% of vetch seeds recently shed from the maternal plant are able to germinate [54].
Similar to other members of the legume group, combinational dormancy (physiological and physical) occurs in seeds of V. villosa. Many hard seeds, after the removal of physiological dormancy, are capable of germinating over a wide range of environmental conditions (Table 1). The release of seeds of V. villosa from dormancy would be accelerate by the after-ripening environment in the summer. Hence, in summer, the dormancy of V. villosa seeds would be alleviated and the emergence of seedlings would take place in autumn. Afterwards, the best-established seedlings would survive the harsh winter [75].
According to this information, it could be concluded that mitigating the seed dormancy of hairy vetch and providing enough water for its successful germination are two main factors determining the acceptance of this crop as a fall-planted legume cover crop. Dormant seeds add to the soil seedbank in two different ways: contaminated seeds aimed at the cultivation of the cover crop, and those from unsuccessfully determined cover plants.
It has been reported that priming is not effective in releasing dormancy in hard (viable seeds that do not imbibe water and thus fail to germinate in an apparently favorable scenario) and physiologically dormant seeds, while negatively affect seedling growth, particularly under water deficit conditions (Rolston 1978).
Hard seeds and regrowth after termination with mechanical means usually results in the weediness of V. villosa in subsequent crops. As under reduced tillage conditions the common methods of cover crop vegetative growth termination are mowing or roller crimping, the regrowth of V. villosa is a challenge in conservation systems. In order to reduce the risk of regrowth, conducting mowing during full flowering (50 to 100%) and the early pod setting of plants is suggested [51]. Furthermore, the adoption of early flowering cultivars is more suited as they can be terminated earlier than warm season crops established in spring. Hence, in addition to a low percentage of dormant seeds and their ability to survive a hard winter, early flowering is a major specific trait.
In addition, different genotypes of V. villosa exhibit pod dehiscence [47], resulting in the shattering of seeds prior to the harvest operation yield and adding dormant seeds to the soil seedbank. The percentage of indehiscent pods is partly related to the environmental conditions surrounding the growing mother plants [76]. Despite the negative effects of evolution dormancy in the seeds of V. villosa and their pod dehiscence, these traits would make the utility of cover crops in agroecosystems cost effective [77]. This is mainly due to the improvement of self-regeneration no-till cropping systems [54].
The faba bean (V. faba, broad bean, horse bean), another important member of the legume group, is cultivated as a winter annual. It tolerates cold temperatures, as opposed to field peas, since the cold does not terminate V. faba growth. Furthermore, V. faba fixes more N2 than other cool-season legumes, like winter pea (P. sativum) and lupin (Lupinus albus L.) [78]. Peas are sensitive to the cold, limiting their cultivation during winter in temperate regions. Legume seeds are generally not hard and tolerate bad soil [79].
Factors contributing to the weediness of legume cover crops, and V. villosa in particular, are the development of combinational dormancy mechanisms in seeds, the capacity for regrowth after mechanical termination, and pod dehiscence. When compared to other members of Fabaceae, V. villosa is less domesticated. To minimize the weediness threat of V. villosa in subsequent cash crops, breeding to reduce pod dehiscence, proper cultivar selection, the avoidance of any environmental stress to growing plants, and the choice of suitable termination times and methods could be useful recommendations.

3.1.2. Trifolium sp.

Several species of the genus Trifolium are commonly adopted for cover cropping, due to their rapid growth and allelopathic activity (containing phenols and isoflavonoids) on weeds [80,81].
Seeds of different clover species can germinate in low temperatures and grow well in shady, cool, and moist conditions, which is common under the closed canopy of cash crops. Hence, clovers are the best option to use for interseeding [82]. Nevertheless, small seed sizes, low seedling vigor, the development of seed dormancy, and poor establishment are some weaknesses of clovers are hindering their extensive application as cover crops [83].
Similar to most Fabaceae species, the seeds of clover exhibit a variable ratio of hard seeds. The proportion of hard seeds depends on soil and environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity, soil texture, fertility, and photoperiod [84]. Accordingly, varieties of the same species show variation in the seed hardiness percentage. Hence, clover species may persist in soil seed banks and become weeds in the next crop [85]. Research suggests that the growth characteristics of Trifolium sp. Abilities vary greatly among species, suiting each species for their intended uses.

3.2. Poaceae

There are numerous annual and perennial grass species that can be used as cover crops. Globally, cereals commonly used as cover crops are Secale cereale L., Avena sativa L., Lolium perenne L., and Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. [86]. Grasses present special traits suitable for weed suppression proposes within crops, mainly superficial root systems, allowing them to control weeds without competing for water with the main crop [87]. The best results from cultivating grasses have been achieved when they are established in optimum time, which in turn is dependent on the seed germination process [68].
Winter annual grasses germinate during fall, coinciding with cool and moist conditions. This cycle is regulated by the presence of non-deep physiological dormancy commonly overcome by high temperatures of summer during dry-after-ripening [88]. Furthermore, the optimum temperature for germinating the seeds of these plants is about 16 °C, preventing the germination of non-dormant and freshly shed seeds in summer (Table 1).
Jiménez-Alfaro et al. [68] evaluated seed germination in response to various temperature regimes by collecting seeds from six winter annual grass species growing in Spanish olive gardens to determine their suitability to be used as ground cover in Mediterranean agroecosystems.
Their results showed that, contrary to previously published works, dormancy showed a low effect on preventing summer germination. However, this low level of dormancy was helpful in inhibiting seed germination immediately after dispersal and under hot and dry conditions during the summer.
In general, low temperatures and adequate moisture, which are common characteristic of the fall season of temperate regions, provide suitable conditions for the seed germination of these winter annual grasses [68].
S. cereale is the most common winter grass cover crop. In this crop, the amount of nitrogen scavenged, the main benefit of adopting this species as cover crop, is greatly dependent on biomass production, growing season length, and the burial depth of the seed in the soil [89].
S. cereale is one of the most recently domesticated cereals, so it poses a great danger to spreading as an important weed [90]. This species is very challenging in cereal crops like wheat and barley, as there is no chemical option for its control. In addition, seeds of its wild relatives exhibit varying level of dormancy, which enable S. cereale to maintain its presence in the subsequent crops in the rotation [11].

3.3. Brassicaceae

Cover crops belonging to the Brassicaceae family (mustards or Cruciferae) contain various allelochemicals, mainly glucosinolates. Derivates of this compound, including organic cyanides, oxazolidinethione, and isothiocyanates, can suppress weeds [91]. By the incorporation of residues of mustards into soils, its allelochemicals act as a biofumigant against the germination and growth of weeds [92].
To maximize the efficacy of Brassicaceae species in enhancing agroecosystem productivity and hindering its weediness in subsequent cash crops, the optimum timing of termination is necessary. Under poor termination, the high growth rate and pod-shattering characteristics of some Brassicaceae cover crops make surviving plants problematic weeds. Additionally, seeds added to the soil seed bank remain dormant for many years and become a challenge for the next crops [93] (Table 1).
Mustard seeds are very small, hindering them from emerging from deep layers and coarse-texture soil layers [94]. Therefore, preparing a soft and fine seedbed is essential for successful establishment. This is a very important issue that should be considered about Brassicacea, as the main mechanism by which they suppress weeds is through rapid soil coverage [95].
From this review, it could be argued that a suitable establishment time and the optimum density of cover crops are the most important challenges for achieving the desired ecosystem services and the highest degree of weed suppression from all three main cover crop groups, namely, Fabaceae, Poaceae, and Brassicaceae, and others regardless of their seed and seedling emergence traits. Climate variables, oil properties, management practices, and species characteristics together contribute to influence these challenges [96].
Tribouillois et al. [96] investigated the emergence dynamics of cover crop species, mainly from three botanical families (Fabaceae, Poaceae, Brassicaceae), under different field conditions to estimate the emergence duration and time in response to different sowing conditions with a static model. The results indicated a drastically high variation in emergence duration and percentage depending on the situations of each cover crop species. Furthermore, they concluded that the emergence of cover crops is strongly related to water availability.
In addition, they showed that crucifer cover crop species, such as Brassica rapa and S. alba, by having a short emergence duration, are capable of being cultivated in late summer. This is because their germination and emergence processes take place within a few days, enabling them to benefit from rare rainfall or the moisture of the seedbed. In opposition, the sowing of legumes with delayed emergence is sensitive to water deficit, probably because of the seeds’ slower water consumption. The rapid emergence of Brassicaceae may explain their ability to suppress weeds effectively.

4. Solutions for Enhancing Cover Crop Seed Germinability

4.1. Agronomic Practices

Sowing Time and Planting Geometry

Cover crops can be undersown between rows of cash crops, providing a living mulch of companion cover crops that can inhibit the seed germination of photoblastic seeds and the suppression of seedling growth [97]. Undersown cover crops for weed suppression are used for low, taprooted competitive crops like sugar beet, cotton, and canola, which are sown in wide row spaces [98].
The main types of cover crop sowing methods are drilling and broadcasting (aerial spreading or interseeding) seeds. Drilling seeds by burying the seeds into the soil will result in a better cover crop establishment when compared with the broadcasting method [99]. In small-seeded species, required seeding rates are higher for broadcasting seeds as cover crops establish poorly [100].
Broadcasting cover crop seeds into living cash crops (like corn and sugar beet), particularly at crop maturity, can allow for better cover crop establishment as seeds benefit from warm and moist conditions created by leaves [101]. Broadcasting cover crops into cash crops at crop maturity has several advantages, mainly more biomass production, although the seeding rate is higher (at least 25 to 50%) than that of the drilling sowing method [102,103]. Furthermore, interseeding would result in the poor establishment of cover crops as seeds left on the soil surface are exposed to biotic and abiotic stresses, such as water deficit, low-light conditions, and seed predators [89,104]. Mirsky et al. [105] suggested a soil depth range of 3 to 5 cm to obtain the highest seed germination percentage.
On the other hand, in no-till conditions, broadcasting cover crop seeds into the crop residue reaming from harvesting either winter or summer crops provides a protective means for the seed germination and seedling emergence of cover crops against adverse factors such as wind speed, soil evaporation, and chilling temperature [106,107]. A linear relationship between cover crop stand counts and seeding rate has been reported, with an exception of species from Poaceae. In cover crops of Poaceae, limited available water will further restrict their seeding rate in the broadcast interseeded method [108].
The rapid emergence of cover crops sown in a tillage system would result in more weed management as cover crops emerge more rapidly, due to better access to soil moisture [109,110]. Poor soil–seed contact in no-till usually limits seed germination, as locating seeds on the straw deprives seeds from water for germination. On the other hand, deep tilling by burying weed seeds worsens the weed problem [97]. Hence, providing suitable seed contact with the soil by optimizing the seeding depth (2–3 cm) is crucial for the successful germination and seedling growth of cover crops.

4.2. Seed Pre-Treatment

4.2.1. Seed Priming

Seed priming is the process of accelerating water absorption by seeds and the onset of the metabolism phases of germination, before radical protrusion and then drying and stabilizing at the original moisture level [111]. Seed priming by initiating physiological and biochemical contents of treated seeds enhances aspects of the seed germination and seedling emergence of a wide range of crop species (Table 2).
Seed priming improves the seed germination and seedling establishment of cover crops in the early growing season. In addition, it causes the rapid growth of cover crops through increasing the water uptake and nutrients, securing higher as well as more uniform cover crop stands [132,151]. Seed germination and seedling emergence responses to seed priming vary among species (Table 2). Cover crop species with a small seed size and hard seed coating [152,153] are more likely to benefit more. In addition, both priming media and duration impact seed germination and seedling emergence [154].
In semi-arid areas, a lack of moisture in early autumn inhibits seed germination and the seedling growth of cover crops. Hence, accelerating the germination of cover crops by priming not only makes their seedlings more tolerant to water stress, but also enhances their competitiveness against weeds. For example, Yusefi-Tanha et al. [141] reported that the priming of hairy vetch seeds with potassium nitrate and distilled water prompted guaiacol peroxidase and catalase activity in seedlings and subsequently enhanced the ability of the seedling to resist oxygen free radicals resulting from the peroxidation of different compounds. Furthermore, they demonstrated that the performance of different priming methods in enhancing the germination of hairy vetch varied depending on ambient temperature.
Under low temperature conditions, the hydropriming (soaking seeds in water) of hairy vetch had a higher positive impact on seed germination in comparison with either halopriming or hydropriming. In contrast, under a higher temperature (15 °C) the efficacy of priming was not significantly different from non-primed conditions, showing the advantage of priming only under adverse conditions. Yusefi-Tanha et al. [141] concluded that both halopriming and hydropriming were more efficient in improving seedling establishment and the early growth of hairy vetch at lower temperatures by enhancing physiological parameters and the germination process.
In another study, the effect of seed priming duration on the germination of some cover crop species’ seed size and germination traits, including cereal rye (S. cereale), perennial ryegrass (L. perenne), hairy vetch (V. villosa), and oriental mustard (Brassica juncea L.), was investigated [115]. They determined the effectiveness of priming for the seedling emergence of perennial ryegrass and hairy vetch under compaction for evaluating the seedling vigor.
Similar to the above-mentioned study, Snapp et al. [115] demonstrated that seed priming accelerates germination for hairy vetch, mustard, and perennial ryegrass. Perennial ryegrass, with the smallest seed size among the evaluated species, was the only species in which seed germination was improved substantially by priming under non-stress conditions. They showed that the seedling emergence of hairy vetch and perennial ryegrass in compacted soil was improved by seed priming (Table 2), by 39% and 42%, respectively, compared with unprimed seeds [115]. This is a valuable result, as cover crops can be cultivated in compacted soil, as in the early years of conservation agriculture.
Hydro-priming and osmo-priming (soaking seed in chemicals that reduce the osmotic potential of seed) are regularly applied to improve seed performance in various cultivated crops [155]. Increased seed germination by priming seeds with potassium nitrate (KNO3) can be achieved using one or more mechanisms, including the softening of the impermeable seed coat, the release of ethylene within embryonic tissues, and the washing out of seed germination-inhibitor compounds from seeds [156,157]. For example, [140] pointed out that hydro-priming is suitable for older seeds of pod vetch [V. villosa and Vicia dasycarpa Ten.], while they also found osmo-priming (with KNO3) to be a better pre-treatment for freshly harvested seeds.

4.2.2. Seed Coating

Covering seeds with external materials to improve their handling and protection and, to a considerably lesser extent, germination enhancement, seedling vigor, and stand establishment is called seed coating [158]. Seed coating with biostimulants consisting of microbial inoculants, beneficial bacteria and fungi, nitrogen-containing compounds, biopolymers, and plant extracts is more environmentally friendly and effective compared to less sustainable conventional pesticides and fertilizers [159,160,161]. Amongst other seed coating techniques, seed pelleting, film coating, and seed encrusting are the most commonly used. Seed germination and the seedling vigor of coated seeds are not only influenced by chemical properties of applied compounds, but also, to a higher extent, by physical properties and the thickness of the coating. Hence, an optimum coating thickness also should be determined for a given cover crop species in order for the seed coating to be effective.
Qiu et al. [134] investigated the seed germination and seedling growth of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and perennial ryegrass (L. perenne) seed responses to coating with different combinations of soy flour, diatomaceous earth, micronized vermicompost, and concentrated vermicompost extract. Results indicated that the germination percentage, uniformity, speed, and seedling growth of coated seeds of red clover were higher when compared with the non-treated-seeds control.
In opposition to red clover, seed coating with various biostimulants reduced the seed germination for perennial ryegrass, while the growth in seedlings produced by coated seeds was significantly enhanced. The results of this study emphasize the importance of species-specific responses to coating treatments when adopting seed coating for improving the germination and subsequent establishment of the desired cover crops.

5. Conclusions

The delivery of most ecosystem services is related to cover crop biomass productivity and results from successful establishment and early growth, which in turn are affected greatly by cover crop seed traits. Here, we showed for the first time that seed traits of cover crops are the major drivers of cover crop weed suppression. Furthermore, information on the response of cover crop seed germination to biotic and abiotic factors, as well as methods for improving germination and seedling emergence, is crucial. Farmers facing climate change are looking for species/varieties with appropriate seed traits which, coupled with innovative farming strategies, could allow them to obtain a fair return on investment. The information presented in this review on the seed traits and treatments of cover crops would be helpful for a diversity of stakeholders (e.g., farmers, extension services, researchers, seed companies) wanting to use cover crops more effectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: I.N. Writing (original draft preparation): I.N., N.E.K. and S.C. All authors contributed to the writing (review and editing) stage and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the French program Investissements d’Avenir ANR PPR SPECIFICS project (ANR-20-PCPA-0008).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study will be made publicly available in the ERDA repository, upon acceptance for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bond, W.; Turner, R.; Grundy, A. A review of non-chemical weed management. In HDRA, the Organic Organisation; Ryton Organic Gardens: Coventry, UK, 2003; p. 81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Colbach, N.; Petit, S.; Chauvel, B.; Deytieux, V.; Lechenet, M.; Munier-Jolain, N.; Cordeau, S. The Pitfalls of Relating Weeds, Herbicide Use, and Crop Yield: Don’t Fall Into the Trap! A Critical Review. Front. Agron. 2020, 2, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Travlos, I.; De Prado, R.; Chachalis, D.; Bilalis, D.J. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds: Early Detection, Mechanisms, Dispersal, New Insights and Management Issues; Frontiers Media SA: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Albrecht, H.; Cambecèdes, J.; Lang, M.; Wagner, M. Management options for the conservation of rare arable plants in Europe. Bot. Lett. 2016, 163, 389–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Adeux, G.; Vieren, E.; Carlesi, S.; Bàrberi, P.; Munier-Jolain, N.; Cordeau, S. Mitigating crop yield losses through weed diversity. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 1018–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heap, I. The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. Available online: www.weedscience.org (accessed on 19 March 2020).
  7. Stoate, C.; Baldi, A.; Beja, P.; Boatman, N.; Herzon, I.; Van Doorn, A.; De Snoo, G.; Rakosy, L.; Ramwell, C. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 91, 22–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weber, J.F.; Kunz, C.; Peteinatos, G.G.; Zikeli, S.; Gerhards, R. Weed control using conventional tillage, reduced tillage, no-tillage, and cover crops in organic soybean. Agriculture 2017, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Petit, S.; Cordeau, S.; Chauvel, B.; Bohan, D.; Guillemin, J.-P.; Steinberg, C. Biodiversity-based options for arable weed management. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bhaskar, V.; Westbrook, A.S.; Bellinder, R.R.; DiTommaso, A. Integrated management of living mulches for weed control: A review. Weed Technol. 2021, 35, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nosratti, I.; Sabeti, P.; Chaghamirzaee, G.; Heidari, H. Weed problems, challenges, and opportunities in Iran. Crop Prot. 2020, 134, 104371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, V.; Obour, A.; Jha, P.; Liu, R.; Manuchehri, M.R.; Dille, J.A.; Holman, J.; Stahlman, P.W. Integrating cover crops for weed management in the semiarid US Great Plains: Opportunities and challenges. Weed Sci. 2020, 68, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Teasdale, J.; Brandsaeter, L.; Calegari, A.; Neto, F.S.; Upadhyaya, M.; Blackshaw, R. Cover crops and weed management. In Non Chemical Weed Management Principles; Concepts and Technology; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2007; pp. 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  14. Scavo, A.; Fontanazza, S.; Restuccia, A.; Pesce, G.R.; Abbate, C.; Mauromicale, G. The role of cover crops in improving soil fertility and plant nutritional status in temperate climates. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 42, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rouge, A.; Adeux, G.; Busset, H.; Hugard, R.; Martin, J.; Matejicek, A.; Moreau, D.; Guillemin, J.-P.; Cordeau, S. Weed suppression in cover crop mixtures under contrasted levels of resource availability. Eur. J. Agron. 2022, 136, 126499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rouge, A.; Adeux, G.; Busset, H.; Hugard, R.; Martin, J.; Matejicek, A.; Moreau, D.; Guillemin, J.-P.; Cordeau, S. Carry-over effects of cover crops on weeds and crop productivity in no-till systems. Field Crop. Res. 2023, 295, 108899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Osipitan, O.A.; Dille, J.A.; Assefa, Y.; Knezevic, S.Z. Cover crop for early season weed suppression in crops: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 2211–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mahé, I.; Chauvel, B.; Colbach, N.; Cordeau, S.; Gfeller, A.; Reiss, A.; Moreau, D. Deciphering field-based evidences for crop allelopathy in weed regulation. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 42, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Teasdale, J.; Hatfield, J.; Buhler, D.; Stewart, B. Cover crops, smother plants, and weed management. Integr. Weed Soil Manag. 1998, 247, 270. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tursun, N.; Işık, D.; Demir, Z.; Jabran, K. Use of Living, Mowed, and Soil-Incorporated Cover Crops for Weed Control in Apricot Orchards. Agronomy 2018, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ward, M.J.; Ryan, M.R.; Curran, W.S.; Barbercheck, M.E.; Mortensen, D.A. Cover crops and disturbance influence activity-density of weed seed predators Amara aenea and Harpalus pensylvanicus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Weed Sci. 2011, 59, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schipanski, M.E.; Barbercheck, M.; Douglas, M.R.; Finney, D.M.; Haider, K.; Kaye, J.P.; Kemanian, A.R.; Mortensen, D.A.; Ryan, M.R.; Tooker, J. A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems. Agric. Syst. 2014, 125, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moonen, A.; Barberi, P. Size and composition of the weed seedbank after 7 years of different cover-crop-maize management systems. Weed Res. 2004, 44, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lawley, Y.E.; Teasdale, J.R.; Weil, R.R. The mechanism for weed suppression by a forage radish cover crop. Agron. J. 2012, 104, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Johnson, G.A.; Defelice, M.S.; Helsel, Z.R. Cover crop management and weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 1993, 7, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alonso-Ayuso, M.; Gabriel, J.L.; García-González, I.; Del Monte, J.P.; Quemada, M. Weed density and diversity in a long-term cover crop experiment background. Crop Prot. 2018, 112, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Büchi, L.; Wendling, M.; Amossé, C.; Jeangros, B.; Charles, R. Cover crops to secure weed control strategies in a maize crop with reduced tillage. Field Crop. Res. 2020, 247, 107583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Smith, R.G.; Warren, N.D.; Cordeau, S. Are cover crop mixtures better at suppressing weeds than cover crop monocultures? Weed Sci. 2020, 68, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Derrouch, D.; Chauvel, B.; Felten, E.; Dessaint, F. Weed Management in the Transition to Conservation Agriculture: Farmers’ Response. Agronomy 2020, 10, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cordeau, S.; Smith, R.G.; Gallandt, E.R.; Brown, B.; Salon, P.; DiTommaso, A.; Ryan, M.R. Timing of tillage as a driver of weed communities. Weed Sci. 2017, 65, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Adeux, G.; Cordeau, S.; Antichi, D.; Carlesi, S.; Mazzoncini, M.; Munier-Jolain, N.; Bàrberi, P. Cover crops promote crop productivity but do not enhance weed management in tillage-based cropping systems. Eur. J. Agron. 2021, 123, 126221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barzman, M.; Bàrberi, P.; Birch, A.N.E.; Boonekamp, P.; Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S.; Graf, B.; Hommel, B.; Jensen, J.E.; Kiss, J.; Kudsk, P. Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 1199–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Osipitan, O.A.; Dille, J.A.; Assefa, Y.; Radicetti, E.; Ayeni, A.; Knezevic, S.Z. Impact of cover crop management on level of weed suppression: A meta-analysis. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mennan, H.; Jabran, K.; Zandstra, B.H.; Pala, F. Non-chemical weed management in vegetables by using cover crops: A review. Agronomy 2020, 10, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Grünwald, N.J.; Hu, S.; van Bruggen, A.H.C. Short-term Cover Crop Decomposition in Organic and Conventional Soils: Characterization of Soil C, N, Microbial and Plant Pathogen Dynamics. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2000, 106, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Constantin, J.; Le Bas, C.; Justes, E. Large-scale assessment of optimal emergence and destruction dates for cover crops to reduce nitrate leaching in temperate conditions using the STICS soil–crop model. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 69, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, C.; Sun, R.; Lu, X.; Jin, T.; Peng, X.; Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, W. Seed-germination ecology of Vicia villosa Roth, a cover crop in orchards. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bradford, K.J. A water relations analysis of seed germination rates. Plant Physiol. 1990, 94, 840–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yin, X.; Kropff, M.J.; McLaren, G.; Visperas, R.M. A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1995, 77, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Constantin, J.; Dürr, C.; Tribouillois, H.; Justes, E. Catch crop emergence success depends on weather and soil seedbed conditions in interaction with sowing date: A simulation study using the SIMPLE emergence model. Field Crop. Res. 2015, 176, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brisson, N.; Gary, C.; Justes, E.; Roche, R.; Mary, B.; Ripoche, D.; Zimmer, D.; Sierra, J.; Bertuzzi, P.; Burger, P.; et al. An overview of the crop model stics. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18, 309–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tribouillois, H.; Dürr, C.; Demilly, D.; Wagner, M.H.; Justes, E. Determination of Germination Response to Temperature and Water Potential for a Wide Range of Cover Crop Species and Related Functional Groups. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bewley, J.D. Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Nosratti, I.; Almaleki, S.; Chauhan, B.S. Seed Germination Ecology of Soldier Thistle (Picnomon acarna): An Invasive Weed of Rainfed Crops in Iran. Weed Sci. 2019, 67, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Payamani, R.; Nosratti, I.; Amerian, M. Variations in the germination characteristics in response to environmental factors between the hairy and spiny seeds of hedge parsley (Torilis arvensis Huds.). Weed Biol. Manag. 2018, 18, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fuller, D.Q.; Allaby, R.G.; Stevens, C. Domestication as innovation: The entanglement of techniques, technology and chance in the domestication of cereal crops. World Archaeol. 2010, 42, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kissing Kucek, L.; Riday, H.; Rufener, B.P.; Burke, A.N.; Eagen, S.S.; Ehlke, N.; Krogman, S.; Mirsky, S.B.; Reberg-Horton, C.; Ryan, M.R. Pod Dehiscence in Hairy Vetch (Vicia villosa Roth). Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Parker, T.A.; Mier y Teran, J.C.B.; Palkovic, A.; Jernstedt, J.; Gepts, P. Genetic control of pod dehiscence in domesticated common bean: Associations with range expansion and local aridity conditions. bioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Nosratti, I.; Soltanabadi, S.; Honarmand, S.J.; Chauhan, B.S. Environmental factors affect seed germination and seedling emergence of invasive Centaurea balsamita. Crop Pasture Sci. 2017, 68, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dürr, C.; Dickie, J.B.; Yang, X.Y.; Pritchard, H.W. Ranges of critical temperature and water potential values for the germination of species worldwide: Contribution to a seed trait database. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 200, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mischler, R.; Duiker, S.W.; Curran, W.S.; Wilson, D. Hairy vetch management for no-till organic corn production. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Keene, C.; Curran, W.; Wallace, J.; Ryan, M.; Mirsky, S.; VanGessel, M.; Barbercheck, M. Cover crop termination timing is critical in organic rotational no-till systems. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bekker, R.; Bakker, J.; Grandin, U.; Kalamees, R.; Milberg, P.; Poschlod, P.; Thompson, K.; Willems, J. Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: Indicators of seed longevity. Funct. Ecol. 1998, 12, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Renzi, J.P.; Chantre, G.R.; Cantamutto, M.A. Development of a thermal-time model for combinational dormancy release of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa ssp. villosa). Crop Pasture Sci. 2014, 65, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. De Morais, L.F.; Deminicis, B.B.; de Pádua, F.T.; Morenz, M.J.; Araujo, R.P.; de Nepomuceno, D.D. Methods for breaking dormancy of seeds of tropical forage legumes. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 46580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2004, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Smýkal, P.; Vernoud, V.; Blair, M.W.; Soukup, A.; Thompson, R.D. The role of the testa during development and in establishment of dormancy of the legume seed. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 351. [Google Scholar]
  58. Soltani, E.; Gruber, S.; Oveisi, M.; Salehi, N.; Alahdadi, I.; Javid, M.G. Water stress, temperature regimes and light control induction, and loss of secondary dormancy in Brassica napus L. seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 2017, 27, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, S.; Gruber, S.; Stockmann, F.; Claupein, W. Dynamics of dormancy during seed development of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Seed Sci. Res. 2016, 26, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gorecki, M.; Long, R.; Flematti, G.; Stevens, J. Parental environment changes the dormancy state and karrikinolide response of Brassica tournefortii seeds. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Vercellino, R.B.; Pandolfo, C.E.; Cerrota, A.; Cantamutto, M.; Presotto, A. The roles of light and pericarp on seed dormancy and germination in feral Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Weed Res. 2019, 59, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Malik, M.S.; Norsworthy, J.K.; Riley, M.B.; Bridges, W. Temperature and light requirements for wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) germination over a 12-month period following maturation. Weed Sci. 2010, 58, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Adkins, S.W.; Bellairs, S.M.; Loch, D.S. Seed dormancy mechanisms in warm season grass species. Euphytica 2002, 126, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stump, W.L.; Westra, P. The seedbank dynamics of feral rye (Secale cereale). Weed Technol. 2000, 14, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Goggin, D.E.; Steadman, K.J.; Emery, R.J.N.; Farrow, S.C.; Benech-Arnold, R.L.; Powles, S.B. ABA inhibits germination but not dormancy release in mature imbibed seeds of Lolium rigidum Gaud. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3387–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar]
  67. Poljakoff-Mayber, A.; Popilevski, I.; Belausov, E.; Ben-Tal, Y. Involvement of phytohormones in germination of dormant and non-dormant oat (Avena sativa L.) seeds. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 37, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jiménez-Alfaro, B.; Hernández-González, M.; Fernández-Pascual, E.; Toorop, P.; Frischie, S.; Gálvez-Ramírez, C. Germination ecology of winter annual grasses in Mediterranean climates: Applications for soil cover in olive groves. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 262, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cordeau, S.; Wayman, S.; Reibel, C.; Strbik, F.; Chauvel, B.; Guillemin, J.P. Effects of drought on weed emergence and growth vary with the seed burial depth and presence of a cover crop. Weed Biol. Manag. 2018, 18, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Teasdale, J.R.; Devine, T.E.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Bellinder, R.R.; Beste, C.E. Growth and development of hairy vetch cultivars in the northeastern United States as influenced by planting and harvesting date. Agron. J. 2004, 96, 1266–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sainju, U.M.; Singh, B.P. Nitrogen storage with cover crops and nitrogen fertilization in tilled and nontilled soils. Agron. J. 2008, 100, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Scavo, A.; Restuccia, A.; Abbate, C.; Lombardo, S.; Fontanazza, S.; Pandino, G.; Anastasi, U.; Mauromicale, G. Trifolium subterraneum cover cropping enhances soil fertility and weed seedbank dynamics in a Mediterranean apricot orchard. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hyvönen, T.; Ketoja, E.; Salonen, J.; Jalli, H.; Tiainen, J. Weed species diversity and community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 97, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dabney, S.; Delgado, J.; Reeves, D. Using winter cover crops to improve soil and water quality. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant 2001, 32, 1221–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Van Assche, J.A.; Debucquoy, K.L.; Rommens, W.A. Seasonal cycles in the germination capacity of buried seeds of some Leguminosae (Fabaceae). New Phytol. 2003, 158, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, Q.; Tu, B.; Liu, C.; Liu, X. Pod anatomy, morphology and dehiscing forces in pod dehiscence of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Flora 2018, 248, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Volesky, J.; Mowrey, D.; Smith, G. Performance of rose clover and hairy vetch interseeded into Old World bluestem. Rangel. Ecol. Manag./J. Range Manag. Arch. 1996, 49, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Andersen, B.J.; Samarappuli, D.P.; Wick, A.; Berti, M.T. Faba bean and pea can provide late-fall forage grazing without affecting maize yield the following season. Agronomy 2020, 10, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vann, R.; Reberg-Horton, S.; Castillo, M.; McGee, R.; Mirsky, S. Winter Pea, Crimson Clover, and Hairy Vetch Planted in Mixture with Small Grains in the Southeast United States. Agron. J. 2019, 111, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Scavo, A.; Restuccia, A.; Lombardo, S.; Fontanazza, S.; Abbate, C.; Pandino, G.; Anastasi, U.; Onofri, A.; Mauromicale, G. Improving soil health, weed management and nitrogen dynamics by Trifolium subterraneum cover cropping. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 40, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, Q.; Xu, R.; Yan, Z.; Jin, H.; Cui, H.; Lu, L.; Zhang, D.; Qin, B. Phytotoxic allelochemicals from roots and root exudates of Trifolium pratense. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 6321–6327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wyngaarden, S.L.; Gaudin, A.; Deen, W.; Martin, R.C. Expanding red clover (Trifolium pratense) usage in the corn–soy–wheat rotation. Sustainability 2015, 7, 15487–15509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Ross, S.M.; King, J.R.; Izaurralde, R.C.; O’Donovan, J.T. Weed suppression by seven clover species. Agron. J. 2001, 93, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nichols, P.; Foster, K.; Piano, E.; Pecetti, L.; Kaur, P.; Ghamkhar, K.; Collins, W. Genetic improvement of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). 1. Germplasm, traits and future prospects. Crop Pasture Sci. 2013, 64, 312–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Baresel, J.P.; Nichols, P.; Charrois, A.; Schmidhalter, U. Adaptation of ecotypes and cultivars of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) to German environmental conditions and its suitability as living mulch. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2018, 65, 2057–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Balfourier, F.; Imbert, C.; Charmet, G. Evidence for phylogeographic structure in Lolium species related to the spread of agriculture in Europe. A cpDNA study. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sebastian, J.; Dinneny, J.R. Setaria viridis: A model for understanding panicoid grass root systems. In Genetics and Genomics of Setaria; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 177–193. [Google Scholar]
  88. Bakker, J. Seeds, ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy, and germination. CC Baskin & JM Baskin. Plant Ecol. 2001, 152, 204. [Google Scholar]
  89. Wilson, M.L.; Baker, J.M.; Allan, D.L. Factors Affecting Successful Establishment of Aerially Seeded Winter Rye. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 1868–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Miedaner, T. Breeding wheat and rye for resistance to Fusarium diseases. Plant Breed. 1997, 116, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sarwar, M.; Kirkegaard, J. Biofumigation potential of brassicas: II. Effect of environment and ontogeny on glucosinolate production and implications for screening. Plant Soil 1998, 201, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Haramoto, E.R.; Gallandt, E.R. Brassica cover cropping: I. Effects on weed and crop establishment. Weed Sci. 2005, 53, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Krato, C.; Petersen, J. Competitiveness and yield impact of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in winter and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2012, 119, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gruber, S.; Pekrun, C.; Claupein, W. Population dynamics of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) affected by tillage. Eur. J. Agron. 2004, 20, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Baraibar, B.; Mortensen, D.A.; Hunter, M.C.; Barbercheck, M.E.; Kaye, J.P.; Finney, D.M.; Curran, W.S.; Bunchek, J.; White, C.M. Growing degree days and cover crop type explain weed biomass in winter cover crops. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Tribouillois, H.; Constantin, J.; Justes, E. Analysis and modeling of cover crop emergence: Accuracy of a static model and the dynamic STICS soil-crop model. Eur. J. Agron. 2018, 93, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cordeau, S.; Guillemin, J.P.; Reibel, C.; Chauvel, B. Weed species differ in their ability to emerge in no-till systems that include cover crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2015, 166, 444–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Baumann, D.T.; Bastiaans, L.; Kropff, M.J. Competition and crop performance in a leek–celery intercropping system. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 764–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fisher, K.; Momen, B.; Kratochvil, R. Is broadcasting seed an effective winter cover crop planting method? Agron. J. 2011, 103, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Haramoto, E.R. Species, seeding rate, and planting method influence cover crop services prior to soybean. Agron. J. 2019, 111, 1068–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Brar, G.; Gomez, J.; McMichael, B.; Matches, A.; Taylor, H. Germination of twenty forage legumes as influenced by temperature. Agron. J. 1991, 83, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mirsky, S.B.; Ryan, M.R.; Teasdale, J.R.; Curran, W.S.; Reberg-Horton, C.S.; Spargo, J.T.; Wells, M.S.; Keene, C.L.; Moyer, J.W. Overcoming weed management challenges in cover crop–based organic rotational no-till soybean production in the eastern United States. Weed Technol. 2013, 27, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Noland, R.L.; Wells, M.S.; Sheaffer, C.C.; Baker, J.M.; Martinson, K.L.; Coulter, J.A. Establishment and function of cover crops interseeded into corn. Crop Sci. 2018, 58, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Koehler-Cole, K.; Elmore, R.W. Seeding Rates and Productivity of Broadcast Interseeded Cover Crops. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mirsky, S.B.; Wallace, J.M.; Curran, W.S.; Crockett, B.C. Hairy vetch seedbank persistence and implications for cover crop management. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 2391–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sauer, T.J.; Hatfield, J.L.; Prueger, J.H. Corn Residue Age and Placement Effects on Evaporation and Soil Thermal Regime. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1996, 60, 1558–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Blanco-Canqui, H.; Wortmann, C. Crop residue removal and soil erosion by wind. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2017, 72, 97A–104A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Boyd, N.S.; Brennan, E.B.; Smith, R.F.; Yokota, R. Effect of Seeding Rate and Planting Arrangement on Rye Cover Crop and Weed Growth. Agron. J. 2009, 101, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gaba, S.; Perronne, R.; Fried, G.; Gardarin, A.; Bretagnolle, F.; Biju-Duval, L.; Colbach, N.; Cordeau, S.; Fernández-Aparicio, M.; Gauvrit, C. Response and effect traits of arable weeds in agro-ecosystems: A review of current knowledge. Weed Res. 2017, 57, 123–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mahé, I.; Cordeau, S.; Bohan, D.A.; Derrouch, D.; Dessaint, F.; Millot, D.; Chauvel, B. Soil seedbank: Old methods for new challenges in agroecology? Ann. Appl. Biol. 2021, 178, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ibrahim, E.A. Seed priming to alleviate salinity stress in germinating seeds. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 192, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Badalzadeh, A.; Shahraki, A.D. Effect of Hydro-priming and Salinity Stress on Germination Indices of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.). Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2021, 69, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kaya, M.D.; Okçu, G.; Atak, M.; Cıkılı, Y.; Kolsarıcı, Ö. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 24, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Allen, R.; Hollingsworth, L.; Thomas, J. Sunflower planting and emergence with coated seed. Trans. ASAE 1983, 26, 665–0668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Snapp, S.; Price, R.; Morton, M. Seed priming of winter annual cover crops improves germination and emergence. Agron. J. 2008, 100, 1506–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Stassinos, P.M.; Rossi, M.; Borromeo, I.; Capo, C.; Beninati, S.; Forni, C. Enhancement of Brassica napus Tolerance to High Saline Conditions by Seed Priming. Plants 2021, 10, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bijanzadeh, E.; Nosrati, K.; Egan, T. Influence of seed priming techniques on germination and emergence of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Seed Sci. Technol. 2010, 38, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Willenborg, C.J.; Gulden, R.H.; Johnson, E.N.; Shirtliffe, S.J. Germination characteristics of polymer-coated canola (Brassica napus L.) seeds subjected to moisture stress at different temperatures. Agron. J. 2004, 96, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Begum, N.; Gul, H.; Hamayun, M.; Rahman, I.U.; Ijaz, F.; Sohail, Z.I.; Afzal, A.; Afzal, M.; Ullah, A.; Karim, S. Influence of seed priming with ZnSO and CuSO on germination. Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 2014, 22, 879–885. [Google Scholar]
  120. Rao, S.; Akers, S.; Ahring, R. Priming Brassica Seed to Improve Emergence under Different Temperatures and Soil Moisture Conditions 1. Crop Sci. 1987, 27, 1050–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chin, J.M.; Lim, Y.Y.; Ting, A.S.Y. Biopolymers for biopriming of Brassica rapa seeds: A study on coating efficacy, bioagent viability and seed germination. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2021, 20, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ahmad, M.; Waraich, E.A.; Hussain, S.; Ayyub, C.M.; Ahmad, Z.; Zulfiqar, U. Improving Heat Stress Tolerance in Camelina sativa and Brassica napus Through Thiourea Seed Priming. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 2886–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Huang, P.; He, L.; Abbas, A.; Hussain, S.; Hussain, S.; Du, D.; Hafeez, M.B.; Balooch, S.; Zahra, N.; Ren, X. Seed priming with sorghum water extract improves the performance of camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) crantz.) under salt stress. Plants 2021, 10, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pimpini, F.; Sambo, P. Seed germination of rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) as affected by osmo-priming. In Proceedings of the Atti V Giornate Scientifiche SOI, Sirmione, Italy, 28–30 March 2000. [Google Scholar]
  125. Kaymak, H.Ç.; Güvenç, İ.; Yarali, F.; Dönmez, M.F. The effects of bio-priming with PGPR on germination of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) seeds under saline conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2009, 33, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gheidary, S.; Akhzari, D.; Pessarakli, M. Effects of salinity, drought, and priming treatments on seed germination and growth parameters of Lathyrus sativus L. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 1507–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Kintl, A.; Huňady, I.; Vymyslický, T.; Ondrisková, V.; Hammerschmiedt, T.; Brtnický, M.; Elbl, J. Effect of Seed Coating and PEG-Induced Drought on the Germination Capacity of Five Clover Crops. Plants 2021, 10, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Kavandi, A.; Jafari, A.A.; Jafarzadeh, M. Effect of seed priming on enhancement of seed germination and seedling growth of annual sainfoin (Onobrychis crista-galli (L.) Lam.) in medium and long-term collections of gene bank. J. Rangel. Sci. 2018, 8, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  129. Ahmad, F.; Kamal, A.; Singh, A.; Ashfaque, F.; Alamri, S.; Siddiqui, M.; Khan, M. Seed priming with gibberellic acid induces high salinity tolerance in Pisum sativum through antioxidants, secondary metabolites and up-regulation of antiporter genes. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Tsegay, B.A.; Andargie, M. Seed Priming with Gibberellic Acid (GA 3) Alleviates Salinity Induced Inhibition of Germination and Seedling Growth of Zea mays L., Pisum sativum Var. abyssinicum A. Braun and Lathyrus sativus L. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 21, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Skwarek, M.; Wala, M.; Kołodziejek, J.; Sieczyńska, K.; Lasoń-Rydel, M.; Ławińska, K.; Obraniak, A. Seed Coating with Biowaste Materials and Biocides—Environment-Friendly Biostimulation or Threat? Agronomy 2021, 11, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jisha, K.; Vijayakumari, K.; Puthur, J.T. Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance: An overview. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 1381–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bortolin, G.S.; Teixeira, S.B.; de Mesquita Pinheiro, R.; Ávila, G.E.; Carlos, F.S.; da Silva Pedroso, C.E.; Deuner, S. Seed priming with salicylic acid minimizes oxidative effects of aluminum on Trifolium seedlings. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 2502–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Qiu, Y.; Amirkhani, M.; Mayton, H.; Chen, Z.; Taylor, A.G. Biostimulant Seed Coating Treatments to Improve Cover Crop Germination and Seedling Growth. Agronomy 2020, 10, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Mondal, S.; Bose, B. Impact of micronutrient seed priming on germination, growth, development, nutritional status and yield aspects of plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 2577–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Galhaut, L.; de Lespinay, A.; Walker, D.J.; Bernal, M.P.; Correal, E.; Lutts, S. Seed priming of Trifolium repens L. improved germination and early seedling growth on heavy metal-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Souguir, M.; Hassiba, F.; Hannachi, C. Effect of NaCl priming on seed germination of Tunisian fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) under salinity conditions. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 9, 86–96. [Google Scholar]
  138. Dawood, M.G.; El-Awadi, M.E. Alleviation of salinity stress on Vicia faba L. plants via seed priming with melatonin. Acta Biológica Colomb. 2015, 20, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. M’Sehli, W.; Kallala, N.; Jaleli, K.; Bouallegue, A.; Mhadhbi, H. Monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) and salicylic acid (SA) as seed priming in Vicia faba L. and Vicia sativa L. Biosci. J. 2020, 36, 2078–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kalsa, K.K.; Abebie, B. Influence of seed priming on seed germination and vigor traits of Vicia villosa ssp. dasycarpa (Ten.). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 7, 3202–3208. [Google Scholar]
  141. Yusefi-Tanha, E.; Fallah, S.; Pessarakli, M. Effects of seed priming on growth and antioxidant components of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) seedlings under chilling stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 428–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Tiryaki, I.; Keles, H. Reversal of the inhibitory effect of light and high temperature on germination of Phacelia tanacetifolia seeds by melatonin. J. Pineal Res. 2012, 52, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Yan, H.; Mao, P. Comparative Time-Course Physiological Responses and Proteomic Analysis of Melatonin Priming on Promoting Germination in Aged Oat (Avena sativa L.) Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Peltonen-Sainio, P.; Kontturi, M.; Peltonen, J. Phosphorus seed coating enhancement on early growth and yield components in oat. Agron. J. 2006, 98, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lee, K.-A.; Kim, Y.; Alizadeh, H.; Leung, D.W. Protection of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) seedlings from salinity stress following seed priming with L-methionine and casein hydrolysate. Seed Sci. Res. 2021, 31, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Scott, J.; Mitchell, C.; Blair, G. Effect of nutrient seed coating on the emergence and early growth of perennial ryegrass. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1985, 36, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Khazaie, H.; Earl, H.; Sabzevari, S.; Yanegh, J.; Bannayan, M. Effects of osmo-hydropriming and drought stress on seed germination and seedling growth of rye (Secale montanum). ProEnvironment Promediu 2013, 6, 496–507. [Google Scholar]
  148. Riazi, A.; Sharifzadeh, F.; Ahmadi, A. Effect of osmopriming on seeds germination of forage millet. Res. Constr. Agric. Hortic. 2007, 77, 72–82. (In Persian) [Google Scholar]
  149. Aune, J.B.; Ousman, A. Effect of seed priming and micro-dosing of fertilizer on sorghum and pearl millet in Western Sudan. Exp. Agric. 2011, 47, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Den Hollander, N.; Bastiaans, L.; Kropff, M. Clover as a cover crop for weed suppression in an intercropping design: I. Characteristics of several clover species. Eur. J. Agron. 2007, 26, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Karssen, C.M.; Haigh, A.; Van der Toorn, P.; Weges, R. Physiological mechanisms involved in seed priming. In Recent Advances in the Development and Germination of Seeds; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 269–280. [Google Scholar]
  152. Willenborg, C.J.; Wildeman, J.C.; Miller, A.K.; Rossnagel, B.G.; Shirtliffe, S.J. Oat germination characteristics differ among genotypes, seed sizes, and osmotic potentials. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 2023–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Eriksson, O. Seed size variation and its effect on germination and seedling performance in the clonal herb Convallaria majalis. Acta Oecol. 1999, 20, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Giri, G.S.; Schillinger, W.F. Seed priming winter wheat for germination, emergence, and yield. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 2135–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Parera, C.A.; Cantliffe, D.J. Presowing seed priming. Hortic. Rev. 1994, 16, 109–141. [Google Scholar]
  156. Dutta, P. Seed priming: New vistas and contemporary perspectives. In Advances in Seed Priming; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 3–22. [Google Scholar]
  157. Nawaz, J.; Hussain, M.; Jabbar, A.; Nadeem, G.A.; Sajid, M.; Subtain, M.U.; Shabbir, I. Seed priming a technique. Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 2013, 6, 1373. [Google Scholar]
  158. Pedrini, S.; Merritt, D.J.; Stevens, J.; Dixon, K. Seed coating: Science or marketing spin? Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Amirkhani, M.; Netravali, A.N.; Huang, W.; Taylor, A.G. Investigation of soy protein–based biostimulant seed coating for broccoli seedling and plant growth enhancement. HortScience 2016, 51, 1121–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Synergistic biostimulatory action: Designing the next generation of plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Calvo, P.; Nelson, L.; Kloepper, J.W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 2014, 383, 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Agronomy 13 01683 g001 550
Figure 1. Influence of temperature and base water potential on the final germination percentage of a wide range of cover crop species [adapted from Tribouillois, Dürr, Demilly, Wagner and Justes [42]].
Figure 1. Influence of temperature and base water potential on the final germination percentage of a wide range of cover crop species [adapted from Tribouillois, Dürr, Demilly, Wagner and Justes [42]].
Agronomy 13 01683 g001
Table
Table 1. Seed dormancy mechanisms and methods to break the dormancy of cover crop species.
Table 1. Seed dormancy mechanisms and methods to break the dormancy of cover crop species.
Cover Crop SpeciesDominant Dormancy PatternMain Method of Breaking DormancyReferences
Fabaceae
Vicia spp., Trifolium spp., Lathyrus sativus, Pisum sativum, Melilotus officinalis, Lupinus spp., Faba spp., and Eruca sativaPhysical (hard seed), physiologicalMechanical abrasion, after-ripening[54,55,56,57]
Brassicaceae
Brassica spp.Induced secondary dormancyAlternating temperatures and the presence of light[58,59,60]
Raphanus sativusMechanical resistance and non-leachable chemical inhibitors associated with the pericarpDry storage[61,62]
Poaceae
Sorghum spp.Seed covering structures (mechanical, permeable, and chemical barriers)Removal of seed coat structures[63]
Secale cerealelimited innate and induced dormancy [64]
Lolium spp.Non-deep physiological dormancyChilling at low temperatures and dry after-ripening[65,66]
Avena spp.High temperature dormancyAfter-ripening in dry storage at temperatures higher than 20 °C[66,67]
Setaria spp.Presence of germination inhibitors in the seed coatSeed coats removed[68]
Aegilops spp., Anisantha spp., Anisantha spp., Bromus spp., Hordeum spp., and Trachynia spp.Non-deep physiological dormancyHigh temperatures through dry after-ripening[68]
Table
Table 2. Seed mass and seed germination responses of a wide range of cover crop species to seed treatment (priming and coating).
Table 2. Seed mass and seed germination responses of a wide range of cover crop species to seed treatment (priming and coating).
Cover Crop Species1000-Seed Weight (mg) §Seed Treatment
PrimingCoating
Guizotia abyssinica3.3+ [112]Unknown
Helianthus annuus48.0+ [113]+ [114]
Brassica carinata5.0UnknownUnknown
Brassica juncea3.0+ [115]Unknown
Brassica napus2.7+ [116,117]+ [118]
Brassica rapa3.7+ [119,120]+ [121]
Camelina sativa1.3+ [122,123]Unknown
Eruca sativa1.3+ [124]Unknown
Raphanus sativus13.0+ [125]Unknown
Sinapis alba8.0UnknownUnknown
Lathyrus sativus176.0+ [126]Unknown
Lens nigricans21.5UnknownUnknown
Lupinus angustifolius179.4UnknownUnknown
Medicago lupulina1.5Unknown+ [127]
Melilotus officinalis2.5UnknownUnknown
Onobrychis viciifolia23.0+ [128]+ [127]
Pisum sativum168.8+ [129,130]+ [131]
Trifoliumalexandrinum3.0+ [132]Unknown
Trifolium incarnatum4.7UnknownUnknown
Trifolium hybridum0.83Unknown
Trifolium resupinatum1.48UnknownUnknown
Trifolium pratense2.04+ [133]+ [134]
Trifolium subterraneum6.28+ [135]Unknown
Trifolium repense075+ [136]+ [127]
Trigonella foenum graecum16.0+ [137]Unknown
Vicia faba359.6+ [138]Unknown
Vicia sativa53.8+ [139]Unknown
Vicia villosa26.7+ [140,141]Unknown
Phacelia tanacetifolia1.8+ [142]Unknown
Avena sativa39.4+ [143]+ [144]
Lolium hybridum3.4UnknownUnknown
Lolium multiflorum2.7+ [145]+ [146]
Secale cereale32.3+ [147]Unknown
Secale multicaule18.8UnknownUnknown
Setaria italica2.2+ [148]Unknown
Sorghum sudanense13.8+ [149]Unknown
Fagopyrum esculentum25.0UnknownUnknown
§ 1000-Seed weight [42,150].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nosratti, I.; Korres, N.E.; Cordeau, S. Knowledge of Cover Crop Seed Traits and Treatments to Enhance Weed Suppression: A Narrative Review. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071683

AMA Style

Nosratti I, Korres NE, Cordeau S. Knowledge of Cover Crop Seed Traits and Treatments to Enhance Weed Suppression: A Narrative Review. Agronomy. 2023; 13(7):1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071683

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nosratti, Iraj, Nicholas E. Korres, and Stéphane Cordeau. 2023. "Knowledge of Cover Crop Seed Traits and Treatments to Enhance Weed Suppression: A Narrative Review" Agronomy 13, no. 7: 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071683

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop