Next Article in Journal
Properties of Biochar Obtained from Tropical Crop Wastes Under Different Pyrolysis Temperatures and Its Application on Acidic Soil
Next Article in Special Issue
Short-Term Evapotranspiration Forecasting of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity in Oilseed and Vegetable Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Accessions Revealed by Nuclear and Mitochondrial Molecular Markers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response of Water-Nitrogen Distribution and Use to Water Deficit under Different Applied Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates in Bromus inermis Grassland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bibliometric Analysis on the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Pest and Disease

1
Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
2
Yunnan Provincial Field Scientific Observation and Research Station on Water-Soil-Crop System in Seasonal Arid Region, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
3
Department of Environmental Science, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat 26000, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(3), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030920
Submission received: 12 February 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 20 March 2023

Abstract

:
Affected by global warming, the frequency of crop pests and diseases have increased, causing huge losses to agricultural production. To better grasp the development and trends of research on the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases, the literature on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases published from 1990 to 2021 in the Web of Science (WOS) core collection database was used. This study explores the literature characteristics and hotspot evolution through the bibliometric visualization analysis software COOC, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace, with a view to identifying the changing characteristics and trends of research changes in this field. The results showed that the number of literature on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases increased rapidly. The main fields involved include environmental sciences, ecology, and agronomy. Papers in these fields mainly published in journals, such as PLos One, Forest Ecology and Management, and Frontiers in Plant Science. The country with the highest number of publications was the United States, followed by China and Australia. The most prolific authors in the top 20 are research scholars from China. The first author of the top 20 highly cited papers was from the United States. It was found that that current research on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases mainly focuses on agricultural production and food safety. Modelling and crop growth has maintained steady development. At present, research in this field mainly focuses on pest management strategies under the impact of climate change, the response of single species, and the complex ecological mechanisms behind the response. This study provides unique insights into the research field of the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases and provides a reference direction for future research development in this field.

1. Introduction

Climate is a key determinant affecting the change and distribution of ecosystems, such as water resources, agriculture, forestry, oceans, and land [1]. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated that global temperatures are still on an upward trend and global warming has not stalled. The global average surface temperature in the last 10 years (2011–2020) is 1.09 (0.95–1.20) °C higher than that in 1850–1900, and 0.19 (0.16–0.22) °C higher than that in 2003–2012 °C [2]. Climate change will have strong impacts on natural ecosystems and socioeconomic development as temperature increases and the frequency of extreme events increases, especially in agricultural production and water use [3,4]. Agricultural production is extremely dependent on climatic conditions, and this vulnerability makes agriculture one of the sectors most sensitive and significant to the effects of climate change [5]. Increased temperatures, elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and the change of precipitation patterns can have significant impacts on crop pests and diseases [6].
It is projected that global crop production will need to double by 2050 to meet growing societal demands [7]. However, all countries/regions share the problem of crop pests and diseases that spread across countries and continents threatening food security [8]. Climate directly affects the physiology and phenology of crop pests, and thus indirectly affects their spread [9], which has a huge impact on the production and prevalence of crop diseases [10]. Pests and diseases are the main factors affecting crop production. Crop pests are sensitive to climate change as most of them are cold-blooded organisms, and their body temperature is influenced by the ambient temperature, water availability, and suitable temperature rank pretty highly [11]. Temperature changes can directly affect pest survival, reproduction, dispersal, and population dynamics, and indirectly affect the relationship between pests and natural enemies [12,13]. New serious pest problems are expected to emerge in the coming decades due to the effects of climate change. The Leptinotarsa decimlineata has continued to spread northward from Europe in recent decades, and is expected to be more widespread and damaging in the future [14]. Crop pests are important vectors for the transmission of many crop diseases, such as viruses, phytoplasmas, and bacteria [15]. It is estimated that crop pests and diseases cause more than $70 billion dollars in economic losses globally each year [16].
The impact mechanisms of climate change on crop pests and diseases are complex, involving not only pest population growth and geographic expansion, but also the interaction of multiple factors in the ecosystem. Therefore, it is important to study the hotspots and development directions in this field for researchers to clarify the development trends in the research field of the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases.
Bibliometrics is a discipline that studies the research status and development trend of a certain field [17]. It is a knowledge system that integrates mathematics, statistics, and the literature, focusing on quantification, and is a research method that can deal with a large amount of literature in related fields and analyze their knowledge orientation [18]. Therefore, with the strengthening of basic theoretical knowledge and the development of knowledge frontiers, using bibliometric methods to analyze the current status and identify the research frontiers in the field of climate change impact on crop pests and diseases, is important for future researchers to study crop pest and disease control. This study used bibliometric and data on visualization software COOC, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to conduct a bibliometric analysis of research on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases published in the Web of Science core database from 1990 to 2021, in order to clarify the development history, research status of research, and trends in this research field. Web of Science, Scopus, and CABI are widely recognized databases worldwide. Web of Science and Scopus are comprehensive academic information resource data covering multiple disciplines, covering almost all disciplines in natural science, social science, engineering technology, biomedicine, humanities, and arts [19]. CABI is one of the most authoritative agricultural and forestry abstract databases, which mainly includes related disciplines in agriculture, forestry, and life sciences [20]. Web of Science and Scopus have become internationally recognized as authoritative tools for the objective and quantitative evaluation of academic journals and scientific research results due to their wide range of subject coverage [19]. Compared with Scopus database, Web of Science has a long history of establishment, covers a long period of publication index records, and provides more detailed citation analysis than Scopus. Therefore, Web of Science data were selected for bibliometric analysis in this study. The main elements of this study are: (1) The number of research papers published each year, journal, country/region, authors, institutions, and cooperation were analyzed by bibliometric methods. (2) Identify the development trends and research hotspots in this field by analyzing the highly cited papers and high-frequency keywords. (3) The overall evolution of the development of the field was captured through the study of frontier identification.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

The Web of Science (WOS) core collection database contains high-quality and authoritative literature data, which has become the current mainstream literature retrieval resource library [21,22]. This study conducted a literature search based on the Web of Science core collection database on 22 August 2022, using the advanced search mode. The publication period was set from “1 January 1990” to “31 December 2021”, and the language was English; the literature types were “ARTICLE” and “REVIEW”, excluding conference papers and patents. The literature search formula was: (Topical Subject (TS) = (climate change or climate warming or warming or global warming) AND TS = (Crop diseases or crop pests or insect pests or pests) AND Document Type (DT) == (“ARTICLE” OR “REVIEW”) AND Language (LA) = =(“ENGLISH”)). A total of 4558 documents were retrieved, including 3735 research articles and 823 reviews. Data sources include information on the use of publication indexes consisting of the following data: year of publication, author/authors, affiliation, or data identifying the journal from which the given text comes. Articles published since 1 January 2022 were excluded, as any collection after this period would include incomplete bibliometric data for that year.

2.2. Data Preprocessing

There were publication duplicates and synonyms in the original data, so the preprocessing of literature data was the key to make the analysis results more reliable. Based on the bibliometric software Co-occurrence 12.8 (COOC), this study conducts data preprocessing through the comprehensive extraction of items. The processes were as follows: (i) delete duplicate publications, (ii) delete nonsense items, and (iii) merging synonyms. COOC software is based on accurate character segment recognition algorithms, which can effectively guarantee the quality of data processing. In addition, COOC software can convert processed data into other common formats for importing into other visualization software for subsequent analysis.

2.3. Research Methods

Bibliometrics is a discipline that integrates structural representation, dynamic description, evaluation, prediction, and scientometrics [23]. Software, such as VOSviewer v1.6.19, CiteSpace v6.1.2, and COOC 12.8, have been widely used for bibliometric analysis. COOC software can preprocess the literature data and construct multi-dimensional relationships, such as frequency statistics, co-occurrence, coupling, and clustering relationship. VOSviewer and CiteSpace software can visualize the data processed by COOC. However, each software has its own limitations, COOC software data visualization function is weak, VOSviewer and CiteSpace software cannot preprocess data and multi-dimensional relationship construction. This study first used COOC software for literature data processing and statistics, and conducts visual analysis of published journals, authors, countries, publishing institutions, funding agencies, highly cited papers, and high-frequency keywords. Then, the VOSviewer software was used to map subject distribution, country/region, author, and keyword co-occurrence networks to study their connections and collaborative relationships [24]. Finally, the knowledge map of clustering genealogy tree of hot keyword-journal bimodal matrix system was drawn by COOC software, to study the correlation between hot keywords and major journals and the development trend of this field. CiteSpace software was used to draw the evolution of hotspots in time zones to understand the history and future direction of climate change in the field of crop pest and disease research.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Basic Characteristics of Literature

3.1.1. Annual Literature Distribution

The change in the number of articles published annually can reflect the development trend and knowledge accumulation in the field of research on the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases. The number of relevant research papers published between 1990 and 2021 showed a steady and rapid growth trend (Figure 1). The development process of the field in the past 30 years (1990–2021) can be divided into the following three stages:
  • Initial germination stage (1990–1998): A total of 41 papers were published, accounting for about 0.9% of the total number of papers. Only a few researchers were engaged in research on the effects of climate change. Among them, there are two representative research papers: Kaukoranta (1996) studied the effect of climate warming on yield loss and disease control requirements for potato late blight by constructing a late blight epidemic time model and a potato growth model limited by late blight [25]. The results showed that disease was expected to break out when the total effective temperature accumulated to above 8 °C after potato emergence reached 156 days. Cannon (1998) research found that migratory pests respond faster to climate change than plants, and may settle in new habitats and endanger crop growth in the future [26]. The expansion of pest and disease ranges and the elimination of edge effects could lead to an increase in species populations near the northern boundary of the UK. These findings have promoted a steady transition from the nascent to the primary development stage in the field of research on the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases.
  • Primary growth stage (1998–2012): Research on the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases has gradually increased, with the number of published articles increased from 24 in 1998 to 177 in 2012. Representative studies include: Patterson et al. (1999) studied the geographic distribution, viability, virulence, and impact on agriculture production of weeds, insects, and plant pathogens under the influence of climate change [27]. Environmental instability and increased extreme weather were found to reduce the effectiveness of pesticides against target pests, causing more harm to non-target organisms, and increasing the challenges of pests for future agriculture [28]. Roos et al. (2011) studied the effects of global warming on plant diseases and insect vectors in Sweden, and found that increased temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns could lead to changes in crop health [29]. These research results provide great help for subsequent scholars to deeply explore the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases.
  • Rapid development stage (2012–2021): The number of published articles showed a rapid growth trend, accounting for about 83% of the total number of published articles. The research content was more comprehensive and rich, and they were closely related to “global warming”. Global warming drives the movement of pests and pathogens [30]. Lehmann et al. (2020) evaluated the interactions between pest range expansion, life history, and population dynamics, and showed that this field still has great potential for future research [14].

3.1.2. Subject Distribution

The research field of the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases involves multiple disciplines, and the distribution of research topics is complex. The distribution of disciplinary categories in this research area is shown in Figure 2, where nodes represent disciplines, node size represents disciplinary output, color represents joint creation clusters of different disciplines, connection between nodes indicates knowledge links between disciplines, and line thickness indicates the closeness of the links. The main disciplines involved in this research field include environmental sciences, ecology, agronomy, plant sciences, and biodiversity conservation. The discipline of environmental sciences was most closely related to other disciplines, and most closely related to ecology and biodiversity conservation disciplines. The disciplines of agronomy and plant sciences were closely related. In general, research on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases mainly focuses on three aspects: environmental sciences, ecology, and plant sciences.

3.1.3. Journal Distribution

Journals are the most important source and indicator of scientific reports and academic research, which can determine the research directions and core values of related research fields. A total of 1021 journals published studies on the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases from 1990 to 2021. The top 15 journals in terms of number of published articles are shown in Table 1, with 5 from the UK, 4 from the United States, and 3 each from the Netherlands and Switzerland. The PLoS ONE journal published in the United States had the highest number of publications with a total of 119 papers published. It is worth noting that Global Change Biology is the top journal in the field of global change and ecology. Although the number of published papers is far less than that of PLoS ONE, its h-Index (217) is at the forefront, indicating that the journal has a greater influence in the research field [31].

3.2. Contribution and Collaboration Analysis

3.2.1. Influential Countries/Regions

A total of 146 countries/regions have participated in research on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases. The top five countries in terms of number of articles published were the United States, China, Australia, the UK, and France, with 1246, 469, 454, 434, and 345 articles published, respectively (Table 2). The United States was the country with the most research in this field, and has published far more articles than any other country. In addition, the United States cooperates closely with other countries and was the country with the strongest degree of international cooperation. This was followed by the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Australia, and China, with France and Germany cooperating most frequently, followed by Australia and China (Figure 3). Of course, it is worth recognizing that other countries have also made great efforts and contributions to the development of research on the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases. The development trend of this research field is jointly participated and promoted by many countries/regions.

3.2.2. Author Contribution and Collaboration

It was found that a total of 17,660 researchers conducted studies related to the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases from 1990 to 2021 through the summary and analysis of the literature information. Among the top 20 authors, in terms of number of articles published, the most authors were from China, followed by authors from Australia (Table 3). The three authors with the most publications were Johnson, S.N., Kriticos, D.J., and Hoffmann, A.A. from Australia, with 21, 21, and 18 articles, respectively. Johnson mainly focuses on crop, pest, and pathogen research in this field. He comprehensively analyzed the effects of climate on crop growth, yield, crop pests, and pathogens, and described the possible interactions between crops, pests, and pathogens under the influence of climate change. He believed that understanding the role of pests and pathogens in crop production systems would help enhance food production security [32]. Kriticos had predicted the potential geographic distribution of specific pests and the serious threat of pests to crops mainly through modeling. His main contribution was the development of a set of global terrestrial climate datasets at 10′ and 30′ resolution, which could be applied to research in agricultural conservation and pest management [33]. Hoffmann mainly studied the effects of future climate change on crop pests and their natural enemies [34]. Additionally, analyzed the extensive impacts of climate change from genes to biomes to humans, suggesting that climate action and policy must focus on biodiversity and ecosystem conservation [35]. Hoffmann is the highest in terms of influence and contribution, with the total citation frequency of 45,998 and h-Index of 102. The h-Index of Kriticos and Johnson were 38 and 33, respectively. They have also made great contributions to the research field of climate change on crop pests and diseases, although their influence was weaker than Hoffmann.
The co-authorship knowledge domain map can provide valuable information for analyzing the contributions and collaborations of authors in this field and help to explore future collaborative teams and co-investigators in this research field. The nodes in Figure 4 represents the authors, and node size represents the number of articles published by authors. The connection between nodes indicates the collaboration relationship, the wider the connection line means the closer the collaboration between authors, and different colors indicate different clusters of collaboration between authors [36]. Several clusters of authors working closely together are presented in Figure 4, such as the clusters represented by Willocquet, L., Ma, Chun-Sen, and Chidawanyika, F. However, the different clusters were relatively independent and less connected, implying relatively little collaboration among authors globally. Therefore, more attention and importance should be paid to interdisciplinary, inter-institutional, and inter-country authorship cooperation in the future development process to enhance teamwork to promote the rapid and diversified development of this research field.

3.2.3. Major Publishing Institutions and Fund Projects

This study found that a total of 4849 institutions have published relevant articles in this field. Among the top 15 institutions in this research field, 6 were from the United States, 3 were from Australia, 2 were from China, and 1 each was from France, Sweden, Canada, and the UK (Table 4). The highest number of publications was published by institutions from the United States, with a total of 439 articles. The National Institute for Agricultural Research from France ranked first with 102 articles, followed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences from China and the United States Forest Service from the United States, with published 88 relevant articles, respectively. The collaborative knowledge mapping of the major publishers showed that the clusters of institutions represented by the larger nodes National Institute for Agricultural Research, University of Queensland, University of Florida, and United States Forest Service were closely linked, indicating frequent collaboration among institutions (Figure 5).
As an important subject of government funding for basic research, the science foundation performed a crucial role in supporting the development of basic research. Among the top 15 funding agencies in the field of impacts of climate change on crop pests and diseases, top 5 fund the most research, namely Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (Sdc), Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Kenyan Government, and European Union (Table 5).

3.3. Highly Cited Papers

Highly cited papers are the key information for laying the foundation of related research fields, and the analysis of their research contents can reflect the development and hot directions of related fields to a certain extent. The top 20 most cited articles in the field of research on the impacts of climate change on crop pests and diseases are shown in Table 6. They have performed a great role in the establishment and development of research theories, research ideas and methods, and core ideas in this field. The top four papers cited were published in “Nature” and “Science” journals, indicating that research papers published in high-quality journals are more forward-looking and easier to be noticed and valued by researchers.
Among the top 20 highly cited articles, eight articles had more than 1000 citations. The rapid accumulation of paper citations indicates that the field of climate change’s impact on crop pests and diseases is receiving increasing attention from research scholars. The first highly cited article was published in the journal Nature titled “The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China” [37], with a citation frequency of 2026 times. The article studies the impact of climate change on China’s economy, water resources, and agriculture, and the study provides a solid foundation for the development of the research on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases. The second most highly cited article was published in the journal Science, entitled “Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores” in the journal Science, with 1775 citations [38]. The article proposes that future large carnivores will influence the extent to which individual species, biomes, and ecosystems respond to climate change. Growing human resource needs and a changing climate will affect crop pest diversity and ecosystem resilience. The third most highly cited article was published in the journal Science, entitled “Ecology-Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota”, with 1721 citations [39]. The article proposed that many pathogens of plant groups were sensitive to temperature, rainfall, and humidity, producing synergistic effects that would affect biodiversity. Climate warming increases pathogen development, survival, disease transmission, and host susceptibility. In order to improve the ability to predict epidemics in plant populations, it is necessary to distinguish between the independent and interactive effects of multiple climate drivers on plant diseases. The fourth most highly cited article was published in the journal Nature, entitled “Impact of regional climate change on human health” [40]. The article focuses on the impact of climate change on food security and human health. The study shows that future climate change will pose increasing health risks, and that the warming trend of recent decades has already led to increased crop morbidity and mortality in many parts of the world. The fifth most highly cited article was published in the journal Nature Reviews Microbiology, entitled “Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere”, with a citation frequency of 1506 times [41]. The article proposed that interactions between microbes and invertebrates influenced the Earth’s biochemical cycles, plant growth, and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. These studies involve assessing the development of micro-flora and macro-flora for sustainable agriculture, nature conservation, and bioenergy crops. In addition, researchers from the United States have made more contributions to this field. The first author of 13 articles from the United States in the cited frequency of top 20 articles, indicating that United States researchers have made great contributions to the development of the field.

3.4. Research Hotspots and Development Trends

3.4.1. High Frequency Keywords

Keywords as the core of paper research and the label of disciplinary information, can highly summarize the main content of research. It can reveal the research hotspots and research directions in related fields through the analysis of high-frequency keywords. The keywords “Climate Change”, “Agriculture”, “Food Security”, “Temperature”, and “Invasive Species” had higher frequencies, with 1030, 119, 116, 109, and 98 times, respectively, indicating that under the influence of climate change agriculture, food security, and invasive species were the hot spots in this field (Table 7). The research found that the research hotspots in this field focused on the distribution and spread of crop pests and diseases, and on this basis, research on the impact on agricultural production and food safety.
Among the hot keywords (Figure 6), the blue cluster centered on Climate Change was the largest cluster, and it was closely linked to Invasive Species (red cluster), Global Warming (yellow cluster), Pests (green cluster), and Agriculture (purple cluster). The red cluster has a wide distribution and focuses on the expansion and management of pests under climate change, including keywords, such as invasive species, climate, phenology, pests management, and range expansion. The yellow cluster mainly includes forest pests, drought, carbon dioxide, forest management, livestock, etc. The cluster focuses on the impact of global warming on forest ecosystem management and forest pests. The green cluster mainly includes keywords, such as insects, maize, rice, wheat, yield, potato, abiotic stress, and disease. The cluster focuses on studying the impact of climate change on the yield of specific crops and crop diseases. The purple cluster mainly includes agriculture, ecosystem services, biodiversity, sustainability, and conservation. The cluster focuses on the study of biodiversity and the development of sustainable agriculture.

3.4.2. Clustering Analysis Based on Bimodal Matrix

Cluster analysis can directly display the relationship between research objects and judge their degree of association [42]. In this study, a two-mode matrix system clustering genealogy tree knowledge map of hot keywords and popular journals was constructed by using Co-occurrence 12.8 (COOC) software. The clustering analysis based on bimodal matrix is improved on the basis of traditional unidimensional system clustering algorithm, which can realize the dual clustering of keywords and journals. Euclidean distance algorithm is used to calculate the distance between samples, Ward minimum variance method is used for sample clustering, Z-Score normalization method is used for matrix normalization [36]. The two-way clustering results of high-frequency keywords and journals in the field of climate change impact on crop pests and diseases research are shown in Figure 7. The box lines in the figure represent the high-frequency keywords and journals corresponding to each column and row. Different color depths indicate the co-occurrence frequency in published articles. The vertical and horizontal clustering trees indicate the clustering results of high-frequency keywords and high-frequency journals, respectively. The hot research directions and popular journal groups in the field can be derived by analyzing the clustering results of hot keywords and popular journals.
The hot spots in the research field of climate change impact on crop pests and diseases were mainly divided into two categories: (A) Focus on climate change research; and (B) focus on a series of impacts studies caused by climate change, mainly including pest management, agriculture, ecosystems, and food security. These two groups could be divided into four areas based on popular journals: (I) “Pest Research and Crop Protection” group; (II) “Plant Science Research and Global Agricultural Development” group; (III) “Pest Management Science and Agroforestry Entomology” group; and (IV) “Agroecosystems and Global Biological Change” group. (I), (III), and (IV) are popular published journals at present. “Global Change Biology” was the one with the most significant correlation with hot keywords, especially with climate change and temperature two-dimensionally. The links between research on the impact of climate change on crop pests, agroecosystems, and food security, and other journal groups are deepening, indicating a gradual diversification of research in this field.

3.4.3. Research Frontier

This study used keywords from highly cited articles to develop a bibliometric model to analyze the research frontiers in the field of climate change’s impact on crop pest and disease research. Figure 8 shows a keyword time zone graph of the top 500 highly cited articles in this field. The Y-axis is the hot keyword clustering, and the X-axis is the publication year. The larger the cross node in the graph, the higher the frequent keyword. Node connectivity indicates the existence of synergistic associations between keywords, and the higher the centrality of a node, the better the co-occurrence of connectivity with other keywords. It could be found from Figure 8 that the earliest research focus in this field was crop productivity.
Keywords, such as climate change, temperature, model, and growth, that appeared from 1990 to 1998 still remain hot in 2021, indicating that these research hotspots had laid a solid research foundation during the development of this field. With the deepening of global warming research, subsequent studies on the effects of pests and diseases on crops gradually began to emerge. For example, the yield losses and the need for pest control caused by potato late blight under the background of climate warming were studied by constructing a potato growth model that comprehensively evaluated the late blight damage [25].
The research directions between 1998 and 2012 have become more and more extensive, with hot keywords, such as pest, impact, adaptation, disease, agriculture, management, biodiversity, resistance, and food security. Researchers began to focus on food security, species diversity, and pest and disease prevention measures. Dietary diversity based on different farming systems provides better nutrition and health, with additional benefits for human productivity and livelihoods [43]. Climate change affects the occurrence, prevalence, and severity of plant diseases, which in turn affects disease management, including the timing, preference, and efficacy of chemical, physical, and biological control measures, and integrated pest management strategies. The establishment of integrated control strategies and effective quarantine systems through preventive plant protection measures (e.g., compound multi-crop variety planting, use of crop varieties with superior disease resistance and tolerance, and adjustment of sowing dates) and disease prevalence prediction were of great importance in agricultural production [44].
The research In this field was more diversified and in a period of rapid development from 2012 to 2021. Most research scholars have begun to focus on the complex responses triggered by global warming. The severity of specific pest occurrences under the influence of climate warming may increase or decrease. The multifaceted and complex nature of insect responses to the ongoing effects of global warming has led to a more comprehensive assessment of the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases (e.g., range expansion, life history, population dynamics, and nutrient interactions) during that period [14]. Pest management strategies are needed in the future as climate change exacerbates pest problems. These management strategies include monitoring climate and pest populations, improving integrated pest management, and using modeling prediction tools [45]. At present, it is still a great challenge to predict the impact of climate warming on crop pests and diseases. In addition, exploring the effects of climate warming on pests and diseases requires the study of individual species responses and the complex ecological mechanisms underlying the responses.

4. Discussion

At present, the research field mainly focuses on the effects of elevated temperature, increased atmospheric CO2, precipitation patterns, and relative humidity on crop pests and diseases. In addition, the top five countries in terms of the number of published articles were the United States, China, Australia, the United Kingdom, and France (Table 2). Fand et al. (2012) found that elevated atmospheric CO2, increased temperature and decreased soil moisture may significantly affect the population dynamics of crop pests, thus affecting crop production [46]. Shrestha (2019) indicated that temperature performs an important role in crop pest metabolism, dispersal, and parasitism, and that temperature changes determine pest population dynamics [47]. The FAO report indicates that climate change has created new ecological niches that provide opportunities for crop pests to reproduce and spread in new geographic environments [8]. Skendzic et al. (2021) indicated that climate change includes not only changes in temperature, precipitation, and rising atmospheric CO2, but also the possibility of extreme climate scenarios, such as glacial melt, permafrost melting, and sea level rise, in the future [45]. Therefore, the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases are complex and multifaceted. Most of the current studies are on the effects of single factors caused by climate change on specific crop pests and diseases, and there is a lack of studies on the effects of multifactor interaction and future extreme climate occurrences on crop pests and diseases.
Most of the studies mainly used model simulation methods to predict the effects of climate change on crop pests and diseases, and there was a lack of field experiment observation research. The prediction model can be used to study the spread and control methods of crop pests and diseases in agricultural fields. Harvell et al. (2002) distinguished the independent and interactive effects of multiple climatic factors on crop pests and diseases through model simulation [39]. This research field should combine model predictions with field observation experiments in the future, and strengthen the research on the impacts of multi-factor interactions and extreme weather on crop pests and diseases under the background of climate change.
“Productivity”, “Model”, “Growth”, and “Carbon dioxide” were hot keywords in the research field of the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases from 1990 to 1998. It means that building models to predict crop growth and productivity was the main research direction in the early stage of this field. With global warming caused by massive emissions of greenhouse gases (CO2), researchers were beginning to assess the effects of future warming on crop yields and crop pests by constructing models [48,49]. The frequency of the earlier hot keywords increased between 1998 and 2012, and new hot keywords, such as “Agriculture”, “Management”, “Biodiversity”, “Resistance”, and “Food Security”, began to appear. Global warming and increased trade between countries/regions exacerbate the rate and extent of crop pest transmission [50]. A large number of countries have begun to pay attention to pest management and food security, leading the key research direction in this field to develop into the impact of climate change on pest management and food security. Since 2012, the hot keywords have gradually diversified, with the main research direction has evolved into a series of complex ecological responses caused by global warming on crop pests, agricultural yields, and economics [51,52]. Therefore, how to effectively control greenhouse gas (CO2) emissions is crucial for future agricultural production and crop pest management. It is important to consider the impact of continuous temperature rise, which is of great significance for future crop pest and disease control strategy and technological innovation. At present, the research on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases tends to be diversified. Researchers pay more attention to the complex responses of crop pests and diseases caused by climate change, such as activity range, life history, population dynamics, and nutrient interactions. In addition, it has also begun to pay attention to the pest management strategy and develop comprehensive management strategies to improve the impact of pests by monitoring the characteristics of pest populations.
This study used visualization software to extract and analysis the research hotspots and development trends in the field of climate change’s impact on crop pests and diseases based on the literature data. However, the limited literature data due to the search formula setting and time span limitations make the analysis results of this study somewhat limited. In addition, the accuracy of data pre-processing using visual analysis software is low, and it is necessary to combine manual screening. The shortcomings, such as cluster overlap and low flexibility in parameter settings, that occur in data visualization are issues that need to be addressed in future research.

5. Conclusions

In this study, COOC, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace visualization software were used to analyze the literature on the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases published between 1990 and 2021. The main conclusions were as follows:
(1)
The literature published in this research field from 1990 to 2021 showed a rapid growth trend. The research is mainly related to environmental sciences, ecology, and agronomy. The three journals with the highest number of publications were PLoS ONE, Forest Ecology Management, and Frontiers Plant Science.
(2)
The United States, China, Australia, the United Kingdom, and France have more publications in this field. The authors from China were the most among the top 20 authors in terms of number of publications. The number of publishing institutions from the United States was the largest, and the relevant publishing institutions were closely connected and cooperate frequently. There are 5 funding institutions with more than 10 articles, namely Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (Sdc), Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Kenyan Government, and European Union. The first authors of 13 of the top 20 highly cited papers were from the United States.
(3)
High frequency keywords “Agriculture”, “Food Security”, and “Invasive Species” indicated that the research hotspots in this field were the impacts of climate change, and crop pests and diseases on agricultural production and food security, and the management of invasive species in ecosystems.
(4)
Based on the research results of this paper, the research trends in the coming years will continue to shift from the impact of climate change on individual crop pests and diseases to a series of complex responses of climate change on crop pests and diseases, and the research direction tends to be diversified. Additionally, based on the basis, modeling, and prediction tools were used to propose pest management strategies, including monitoring climate and pest populations, to improve integrated pest management. This study can provide guidance for scholars to understand the development trend, research direction, and research hotspots in this field through the above analysis.

Author Contributions

Q.Y.: software, data curation, resources, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. T.D.: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. N.L.: supervision, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition. J.L.: methodology, supervision, funding acquisition. T.J.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. H.W.: visualization, formal analysis. J.G.: data curation, writing—review and editing. Y.L.: conceptualization, formal analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 5197913451779113, Key Laboratory Project of Efficient Water Use and Green Production of Specialty Crops in Yunnan Universities, grant number KKPS201923009, Key Projects of Basic Research in Yunnan Province, grant number 202201AS070034, Kunming University of Science and Technology “Double First Class” Creation Joint Special Project, grant number KKAE202223022, and Yunnan Provincial Field Scientific Observation and Research Station on Water-Soil-Crop System in Seasonal Arid Region, grant number 202305AM070006.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Na Li, upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rosenzweig, C.; Major, D.C.; Demong, K.; Stanton, C.; Horton, R.; Stults, M. Managing climate change risks in New York City’s water system: Assessment and adaptation planning. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 2007, 12, 1391–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar]
  3. Agovino, M.; Casaccia, M.; Ciommi, M.; Ferrara, M.; Marchesano, K. Agriculture, climate change and sustainability: The case of EU-28. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 105, 525–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, R.L.; Shu, G. Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture and Adaptive Strategies in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2013, 12, 1402–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lobell, D.B.; Schlenker, W.; Costa-Roberts, J. Climate Trends and Global Crop Production Since 1980. Science 2011, 333, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Skendzic, S.; Zovko, M.; Zivkovic, I.P.; Lesic, V.; Lemic, D. The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Insect Pests. Insects 2021, 12, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tilman, D.; Balzer, C.; Hill, J.; Befort, B.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20260–20264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. FAO. Climate Related Transboundary Pests and Diseases. In Climate Change, Energy and Food; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  9. Trebicki, P. Climate change and plant virus epidemiology. Virus Res. 2020, 286, 198059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trębicki, P.; Vandegeer, R.K.; Bosque-Pérez, N.A.; Powell, K.S.; Dader, B.; Freeman, A.J.; Yen, A.L.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; Luck, J.E. Virus infection mediates the effects of elevated CO2 on plants and vectors. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kocmánková, E.; Trnka, M.; Juroch, J.; Dubrovský, M.; Semerádová, D.; Možný, M.; Žalud, Z. Impact of climate change on the occurrence and activity of harmful organisms. Plant Prot. Sci. 2009, 45, S48–S52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Prakash, O.; Nimonkar, Y.; Munot, H.; Sharma, A.; Vemuluri, V.R.; Chavadar, M.S.; Shouche, Y.S. Description of Micrococcus aloeverae sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from Aloe vera. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 10, 3427–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Field, C.B.; Barros, V.R.; Dokken, D.J.; Mach, K.J.; Mastrandrea, M.D.; Bilir, T.E.; Chatterjee, M.; Ebi, K.L.; Estrada, Y.O.; Genova, R.C.; et al. (Eds.) IPCC Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects; Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lehmann, P.; Ammunet, T.; Barton, M.; Battisti, A.; Eigenbrode, S.D.; Jepsen, J.U.; Kalinkat, G.; Neuvonen, S.; Niemela, P.; Terblanche, J.S.; et al. Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2020, 18, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Boland, G.J.; Melzer, M.S.; Hopkin, A.; Higgins, V.; Nassuth, A. Climate change and plant diseases in Ontario. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 26, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sastry, K.S.; Zitter, T.A. Plant Virus and Viroid Diseases in the Tropics: Volume 2: Epidemiology and Management; No. 15293; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, H.; Hong, R.; Xiang, C.L.; Lv, C.; Li, H.H. Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domains for spontaneous combustion studies. Fuel 2020, 262, 116598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shiffrin, R.M.; Börner, K. Mapping knowledge domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101 (Suppl. 1), 5183–5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Meho, L.I.; Sugimoto, C.R. Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation databases-scopus and web of science. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 60, 2499–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, Y.X. Statistics and analysis of Chinese agricultural documents in cabi database during 1997–2006. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. Agric. 2007, 19, 152–155, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Harzing, A.-W.; Alakangas, S. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 787–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tan, H.; Sun, J.H.; Wenjia, W.J.; Zhu, C.P. User Experience & Usability of Driving: A Bibliometric Analysis of 2000–2019. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2021, 37, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kaukoranta, T. Impact of global warming on potato late blight: Risk, yield loss and control. Agric. Food Sci. Finl. 1996, 5, 311–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cannon, R.J.C. The implications of predicted climate change for insect pests in the UK, with emphasis on non-indigenous species. Glob. Change Biol. 1998, 4, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Patterson, D.T.; Westbrook, J.K.; Joyce, R.J.V.; Lingren, P.D.; Rogasik, J. Weeds, Insects, and Diseases. Clim. Chang. 1999, 43, 711–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fuhrer, J. Agroecosystem responses to combinations of elevated CO2, ozone, and global climate change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 97, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roos, J.; Hopkins, R.; Kvarnheden, A.; Dixelius, C. The impact of global warming on plant diseases and insect vectors in Sweden. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 129, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bebber, D.P.; Ramotowski, M.A.T.; Gurr, S.J. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013, 3, 985–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gonçalves, M.C.P.; Kieckbusch, T.G.; Perna, R.F.; Fujimoto, J.T.; Morales, S.A.V.; Romanelli, J.P. Trends on enzyme immobilization researches based on bibliometric analysis. Process. Biochem. 2019, 76, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gregory, P.J.; Johnson, S.N.; Newton, A.C.; Ingram, J.S.I. Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2827–2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kriticos, D.J.; Webber, B.L.; Leriche, A.; Ota, N.; Macadam, I.; Bathols, J.; Scott, J.K. CliMond: Global high-resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thomson, L.J.; Macfadyen, S.; Hoffmann, A.A. Predicting the effects of climate change on natural enemies of agricultural pests. Biol. Control. 2010, 52, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Scheffers, B.R.; De Meester, L.; Bridge, T.C.L.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Pandolfi, J.M.; Corlett, R.T.; Butchart, S.H.M.; Pearce-Kelly, P.; Kovacs, K.M.; Dudgeon, D.; et al. The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 2016, 354, aaf7671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tan, H.; Li, J.L.; He, M.; Li, J.Y.; Zhi, D.; Qin, F.Z.; Zhang, C. Global evolution of research on green energy and environmental technologies: A bibliometric study. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 297, 113382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Piao, S.; Ciais, P.; Huang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Peng, S.; Li, J.; Zhou, L.; Liu, H.; Ma, Y.; Ding, Y.; et al. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 2010, 467, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ripple, W.J.; Estes, J.A.; Beschta, R.L.; Wilmers, C.C.; Ritchie, E.G.; Hebblewhite, M.; Berger, J.; Elmhagen, B.; Letnic, M.; Nelson, M.P.; et al. Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores. Science 2014, 343, 1241484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Harvell, C.D.; Mitchell, C.E.; Ward, J.R.; Altizer, S.; Dobson, A.P.; Ostfeld, R.S.; Samuel, M.D. Ecology—Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 2002, 296, 2158–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Patz, J.A.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Holloway, T.; Foley, J.A. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 2005, 438, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; van der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Waltman, L.; van Eck, N.J.; Noyons, E.C.M. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J. Informetr. 2010, 4, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Frison, E.A.; Cherfas, J.; Hodgkin, T. Agricultural Biodiversity Is Essential for a Sustainable Improvement in Food and Nutrition Security. Sustainability 2011, 3, 238–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Juroszek, P.; von Tiedemann, A. Potential strategies and future requirements for plant disease management under a changing climate. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Pajač Živković, I.; Lešić, V.; Lemić, D. Effect of climate change on introduced and native agricultural invasive insect pests in Europe. Insects 2021, 12, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fand, B.B.; Kamble, A.L.; Kumar, M. Will climate change pose serious threat to crop pest management: A critical review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2012, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  47. Shrestha, S. Effects of climate change in agricultural insect pest. Acta Sci. Agric. 2019, 3, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bezemer, T.M.; Jones, T.H.; Knight, K.J. Long-term effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on populations of the peach potato aphid Myzus persicae and its parasitoid Aphidius matricariae. Oecologia 1998, 116, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Carter, T.R.; Saarikko, R.A.; Niemi, K.J. Assessing the risks and uncertainties of regional crop potential under a changing climate in Finland. Agric. Food Sci. Finl. 1996, 5, 329–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meynard, C.N.; Migeon, A.; Navajas, M. Uncertainties in Predicting Species Distributions under Climate Change: A Case Study Using Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae), a Widespread Agricultural Pest. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ghazy, N.A.; Gotoh, T.; Suzuki, T. Impact of global warming scenarios on life-history traits of Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae). BMC Ecol. 2019, 19, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Jeffs, C.T.; Lewis, O.T. Effects of climate warming on hostparasitoid interactions. Ecol. Entomol. 2013, 38, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of the number of literature in the field of climate change impact on crop pests and diseases research from 1990–2021.
Figure 1. Distribution of the number of literature in the field of climate change impact on crop pests and diseases research from 1990–2021.
Agronomy 13 00920 g001
Figure 2. Distribution map of discipline categories.
Figure 2. Distribution map of discipline categories.
Agronomy 13 00920 g002
Figure 3. Knowledge mapping of cooperation between countries/regions the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases.
Figure 3. Knowledge mapping of cooperation between countries/regions the impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases.
Agronomy 13 00920 g003
Figure 4. Co-author knowledge domain graph.
Figure 4. Co-author knowledge domain graph.
Agronomy 13 00920 g004
Figure 5. Knowledge map of relevant institutions in the field of climate change’s impact on crop pest and disease research.
Figure 5. Knowledge map of relevant institutions in the field of climate change’s impact on crop pest and disease research.
Agronomy 13 00920 g005
Figure 6. Knowledge graph of keyword co-occurrence networks.
Figure 6. Knowledge graph of keyword co-occurrence networks.
Agronomy 13 00920 g006
Figure 7. Knowledge mapping of systematic clustering genealogy trees based on keyword and journal two-mode matrices.
Figure 7. Knowledge mapping of systematic clustering genealogy trees based on keyword and journal two-mode matrices.
Agronomy 13 00920 g007
Figure 8. Keyword time zone map of highly cited papers from 1990–2021.
Figure 8. Keyword time zone map of highly cited papers from 1990–2021.
Agronomy 13 00920 g008
Table 1. Top 15 Journals in terms of number of articles published.
Table 1. Top 15 Journals in terms of number of articles published.
RankJournal TitleCountryNumber of PublicationsIFh-Index
1PLoS ONEUSA1193.752268
2Forest Ecol. Manag.The Netherlands924.384152
3Front. Plant. Sci.Switzerland746.62783
4ForestsSwitzerland673.28233
5Climatic ChangeThe Netherlands665.174162
6InsectsSwitzerland623.13923
7Global Change Biol.UK5913.211217
8Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.The Netherlands586.576151
9J. Econ. Entomol.USA522.44790
10Sci. Rep.-UKUK514.996149
11Pest Manag. Sci.USA484.462107
12Agronomy-BaselUK483.94914
13Crop Prot.UK463.03687
14Agr. Forest Entomol.UK462.12649
15Environ. Entomol.USA422.38777
IF-Impact factor (selected JCR year: 2021).
Table 2. Top 15 countries in terms of number of articles published.
Table 2. Top 15 countries in terms of number of articles published.
RankCountryNumber of Publications
1USA1246
2China469
3Australia454
4UK434
5France345
6Germany313
7Canada310
8India310
9Italy262
10Spain214
11Brazil168
12Sweden160
13South Africa144
14Switzerland132
15Scotland127
Table 3. Information on the top 20 authors in terms of number of articles published.
Table 3. Information on the top 20 authors in terms of number of articles published.
RankAuthorCountryh-IndexNumber of Publications
1Johnson, Scott NAustralia3321
2Kriticos, Darren JAustralia3821
3Hoffmann, AryAustralia10218
4Fitt, Bruce D. L.England4015
5Ge, FengChina3415
6Garrett, K. A.USA3315
7West, Jonathan SEngland2915
8Ma, Chun-SenChina2015
9Battisti, AndreaItaly3614
10Savary, SergePhilippines3014
11Olfert, O.Canada2414
12Nyamukondiwa, CasperBotswana1614
13Jactel, HerveFrance3913
14Zong, Shi XiangChina1213
15Rao, M. SrinivasaIndia813
16Frank, StevenUSA2812
17Willocquet, LaetitiaFrance2712
18Weiss, R. M.Canada1912
19Tonnang, HenriPeru1912
20Ge, XuezhenChina612
Table 4. Top 15 institutions in terms of number of published articles.
Table 4. Top 15 institutions in terms of number of published articles.
RankInstitutionCountryNumber of Publications
1National Institute for Agricultural ResearchFrance102
2Chinese Academy of Sciences China88
3United States Forest Service USA88
4United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research ServiceUSA87
5Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesSweden85
6University of FloridaUSA77
7Agricultural Research ServiceUSA71
8University of California DavisUSA68
9University of QueenslandAustralia66
10Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesChina59
11Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanada52
12University of MelbourneAustralia51
13Rothamsted ResearchUK51
14Michigan State UniversityUSA48
15University of Western AustraliaAustralia47
Table 5. Top 15 funding institutions.
Table 5. Top 15 funding institutions.
RankFund Supporting OrganizationsTimes
1Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada14
2Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (Sdc)13
3Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)12
4Kenyan Government12
5European Union11
6BBSRC9
7National Science Foundation9
8Genome British Columbia9
9Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada8
10Fundamental Research Funds for The Central Universities [2016zcq07]8
11Cgiar Trust Fund7
12Cgiar Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (Ccafs)7
13Usaid7
14Grains Research and Development Corporation7
15Usda Forest Service7
Table 6. Top 20 highly cited papers.
Table 6. Top 20 highly cited papers.
RankFirst AuthorTitleJournalCountryCF
1Piao, ShilongThe impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in ChinaNatureChina2026
2Ripple, William J.Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivoresScienceUSA1775
3Harvell, CdEcology—climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biotaScienceUSA1721
4Patz, JaImpact of regional climate change on human healthNatureSwitzerland1695
5Philippot, LaurentGoing back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphereNat. Rev. Microbiol.Netherlands1506
6Hulme, Philip E.Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalizationJ. Appl. Ecol.New Zealand1430
7Allen, Craig D.On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the anthropoceneEcosphereUSA1254
8Power, Alison G.Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergiesPhilos. T. R. Soc. BUSA1147
9Challinor, A. J.A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptationNat. Clim. ChangeUSA973
10Simberloff, DanielThe role of propagule pressure in biological invasionsAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S.USA946
11Anderson, PkEmerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology driversTrends Ecol. Evol.USA939
12Jump, AsRunning to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate changeEcology LettersSpain927
13Lin, Brenda B.Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental changeBioscienceUSA706
14Hatfield, J. L.Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop productionAgronomy JournalUSA695
15Vanbergen, Adam J.Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinatorsFront. Ecol. Environ.Scotland690
16Sih, AndrewEvolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental changeEvolutionary ApplicationsUSA688
17Patz, JaEffects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseasesInt. J. Parasitol.USA641
18Kozlowski, TtAcclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stressesBotanical ReviewUSA595
19Witzgall, PeterSex pheromones and their impact on pest managementJ. Chem. Ecol.USA594
20Logan, JaAssessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamicsFront. Ecol. Environ.Canada576
CF-Citation frequency.
Table 7. Top 15 high frequency keywords.
Table 7. Top 15 high frequency keywords.
RankKeywordTimes
1Climate Change1030
2Agriculture119
3Food Security116
4Temperature109
5Invasive Species98
6Global Warming97
7Pests97
8Drought67
9Pests Management67
10Ecosystem Services62
11Integrated Pests Management59
12Phenology58
13Adaptation55
14Biological Control48
15Population Dynamics47
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Q.; Du, T.; Li, N.; Liang, J.; Javed, T.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Liu, Y. Bibliometric Analysis on the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Pest and Disease. Agronomy 2023, 13, 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030920

AMA Style

Yang Q, Du T, Li N, Liang J, Javed T, Wang H, Guo J, Liu Y. Bibliometric Analysis on the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Pest and Disease. Agronomy. 2023; 13(3):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Qiliang, Tianmu Du, Na Li, Jiaping Liang, Tehseen Javed, Haidong Wang, Jinjin Guo, and Yanwei Liu. 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis on the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Pest and Disease" Agronomy 13, no. 3: 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop